An European dual to the NATO?
That would be a good start, but only a start...
Of military transformations. 

   

  Homepage         Disclaimer to these pages      Part XXIII        Part XXIVb        Index to birth of Kweb

 

  
Back to Part 24b


Posted 03 September 2003
Extra text to 26 August 2003

A good idea observed, when there was that rift in the NATO I was very pleased with it. Never ever in the 50+ year history of NATO such a fight has emerged. And now some European countries want something independent from the NATO and I think this is wise. The present situation binds us European countries in all possible ways to the Americans and this is not wise and this is not good for the rest of the planet. We cannot have these stubborn & often standing outside reality figures dominating our European military matters. No! No way and this is a good start to get rid of American influence a little bit.

The same applies to the headquarters of the United Nations, lately I wrote down that wish of me of rebuilding some headquarters somewhere else on this planet and to my surprise the same was told by some collection of (international) lawyer folks. Ha! A rough 2000 law-stuff specialized people were drumming the same drum...

Am I hearing some beautiful music or is it the sizzling in my ears? Enjoy the quotes: 

 

Belgium stands firm over EU military HQ plans.

Belgium insisted Tuesday it is going ahead with plans to open a new autonomous European military command headquarters near Brussels next year, despite opposition from key EU states including Britain.

Belgium, France, Germany and Luxembourg -- the EU states most fiercely opposed to the Iraq war -- proposed the idea shortly after the conflict, following a mini-summit in Brussels at the end of April.

The plan for a new headquarters at Tervuren, just outside the Belgian capital, was immediately lambasted by leaders from more US- friendly EU states who said it would double-up with NATO.

Diplomats from countries opposed to the move have said they hoped the idea would be quietly forgotten.

But Belgian Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt said Tuesday it is still firmly on the agenda.

"The most controversial point... remains that of Europe's capacity to plan and execute European operations autonomously. That is the European military command headquarters," he told a meeting of Belgian ambassadors.

"It is for me an absolute necessity given the existence of autonomous European operations" such as that deployed in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) over the last few months, he said.

"The European Union must be up to planning and deploying such operations. Such an ability will be put in place next year in Tervuren. There cannot be the slightest doubt on this matter," he added.

According to a report in The Times of London last month, Britain has responded to the four-country initiative by proposing the creation of a European "planning cell" based in the NATO military headquarters in Mons, Belgium, to avoid undermining the alliance.

Verhofstadt welcomed that proposal. "I find the British proposal excellent," he said, but insisted that it could not end the need for an autonomous headquarters.

"This cell seems to me to be perfectly suited to serve as a liaison body with the European military command headquarters. But it cannot represent an alternative to the autonomous headquarters," he said.

He added that the four-nation initiative was "completely complementary to NATO," adding that that the new headquarters would be "open to all (EU) member states and future member states."

 

 

 

 

Back to Part 24b

 

 
 

End of extra text.

 

 

 

 

 

_____________________________________________________________

  Homepage         Disclaimer to these pages        Part XXIII      Part XXIVb        Index to birth of Kweb