Disrupting aviation around large airports, relatively easy &
relatively low cost: Build big transmitters that
hinder aviation communication! 

  

  Homepage         Disclaimer to these pages        Part XXXVI        Part XXXVII      Index to birth of Kweb

 

  
Back to Part 37

 

Extra text to 16 September

The study of electronics is a very important study, of course when there are standard apparatus that can be used or easily rebuild & that is handy too. But making electronics entirely according towards your needed specifications is very important.

And the hobby of electronic tool making is a very nice hobby, one can start with small things like electronic dice or simple radio receivers build from loose parts. Beside this practical knowledge you must gain a bit of theoretical knowledge about those sine and cosine things that rule the fine tuning of frequencies in receivers & transmitters. 
And the amplification and discrimination of certain frequencies follow soon then...

After you have mastered the theory & practical difficulties behind receiving and sending radio signals and you have collected lots of handbooks with loose electronic parts it is time for you to study how to make antennas. You need to think upon ways that make these antennas rather concealed, so that for example they look like an integral part of a work of art. 

Since it is your goal to disrupt air traffic around the major airports you don't want to get caught behind your transmitter. That will only lead to jail time in private run & owned corrupt prisons, that is counter productive and a waste of time and a waste of 'feeling good'. So your transmitter must be activated and shot down from a distance. Yes, a remote controlled transmitter is what you need. Take into account that when authorities find your transmitter that there must be no fingerprints on it, try to find chemicals that break down your DNA traces on the transmitter without destroying the fine electronics in it. 

Field experiments are important, how many watt you must send out so that indeed air traffic is disrupted? I do not know but you must find that out. Since the authorities rather likely will hunt down the transmitter you will face all kinds of questions to answer; for example can the transmitter be mobile without you being near it? Or can you place it on a spot that is very hard to reach (high in some mountains or so, together with some large car batteries to keep the transmitter running for some time.) 

So be creative, it can be a nice and rewarding hobby. If you have the brains you can outbeat and outsmart thousands of authorities that have many million dollar budgets. And that will make you feel good, but be careful and never get caught. Because when you can do this many years it is even more fun!  

It might sound hard to build transmitters that send on a lot of frequencies simultaneously (or rotating over the frequencies) but a lot of it is already there. Frequency rotation is a common technique and with a bit of luck you can copy entire schemes to the frequencies you want to block.

Think always forward, when for example the aviation technicians indulge a new technique named 'density transmission' (meaning that with just 100 or 200 milliseconds of transmission to air planes a full second of transmission can be reconstructed) how do you counter that? But time is on your side because complete new technical standards always take lots of time and efforts to implement. And do not worry upon the loss of lives and or damage, if your government wasn't that corrupt this wasn't needed in the first place. Corruption is a choice, don't forget that. All countries get the attacks they deserve.    

Below you can find a few frequencies as in use at one of the American airports. Good luck with climbing the learning curve and never give up. When you work on your own it might take two full years or even longer, with a team it might take shorter. But you will face all kinds of difficulties that you and I can't even imagine right now. GOOD LUCK!  

__________________________

Update 1 from 03 October 2004:

Given the technical fact that cell phone use is assured in a few years time in high altitude flying commercial aircraft, it can be wise not to block certain frequencies for certain airports but look for a broad spectrum disturbance. 

The (technical) antenna problems are unknown to me, you must send out many watts in case widespread disruption can succeed. May be sending out noise for the disturbance is best done via a 'radar method' (sending out many megawatts in a short time, pulse sending). And use not one but four or five transmitters around one major airport, five transmitters sending out synchronized pulses... (With five transmitters it is also much harder for the opponent to find the 'crosshairs' on their stuff.)   

Update 2 from 06 October 2004:

Beside blocking all radio frequencies between air ports and aircrafts, you can also attack (simultaneously?) the radar of airports. Think upon the basic working of a radar; truly many watts of energy are send out , only a tiny fraction of that energy burst comes back. 

So with just a simple beam transmitter you can blind the receiving antenna of the radar involved, it might be handy to make a continuous spectrum analysis of the radar pulse sendings and feed this spectrum into your beam transmitter...

Just be creative, good luck ;)

Update3 from 01 November 2004: A bit more on the previous update, because one way or the other it is not that difficult to blind radar. Analyzing the frequency spectrum send out by the radar and after that beeping the 'right dose' back is not as difficult as sending a man to the moon.
A dedicated amateur can do it (in case the dedicated amateur can lay it's hands on transmitter components in the usual frequency range of 10 centimeter or 3 GHz.) 

A simple picture to understand how you can easily attack all that expensive radar stuff, radar is more or less made from seven basic (yet complicated) components:

    

You see that so called 'Duplexer Switch'? There is where the technical vulnerability is. Many megawatts are sended out and only the tiniest of miliwatts returned. When in between two pulses sended out the by the radar there is 'too much noise' the radar is blinded. Just a pic for two pulses sended out (again from the US army files,  just like the picture above):

  Title: Only in between these pulses, the radar can 'listen'.
  

(Of course PW = Pulse width, RT = Rest time and PRT = Pulse repeating time...) Well good luck with this all, aviation radar can be blinded and air traffic communications can be noised out. All that is left that it is indeed possible to bring over one hundred planes down for the same amount of money as the four 9/11 planes did.

Good luck and have a nice life.  

 

 

 

 

__________________________

Some extra info upon aviation frequencies for radio contact: 

  

Below just a few frequencies in use at the Baltimore-Washington International airport. May be there are more and you also need to know what emergency frequencies there are. 

Also I just do not know how heavy the transmitter needs to be, is a thousand watt transmitter enough? (That sends out spikes during a few milliseconds every second and has average transmission of a thousand watt...) 
Be creative and study how to build transmitters, in two years time a dedicated hobbyist can come far with just a few thousand dollar. Good luck with the disruption of entire airports, good luck. 

119.400 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - Tower 
121.900 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - Ground Control 
118.050 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - Clearance Delivery 
127.800 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - A.T.I.S. 
115.100 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - A.T.I.S. 
119.000 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - Approach 
119.700 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - Approach 
124.550 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - Approach/Departure 
128.700 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - Approach/Departure 
133.750 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - Departure 
122.100 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - F.S.S. 
122.200 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - F.S.S. 
453.900 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - State Police 
154.100 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - Fire 
453.800 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - Administration 
154.980 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - Utilities 
853.2625 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - Parking Lot Shuttle 
856.8875 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - ARINC (Trunked) 
857.8875 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - ARINC (Trunked) 
858.8875 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - ARINC (Trunked) 
859.8875 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - ARINC (Trunked) 
860.8875 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - ARINC (Trunked) 
854.4625 - Baltimore-Washington International Airport - State Services 
462.1125 - Butler Aviation - Baltimore International

(And a bit more, there are also lots of military frequencies of course, here are just a few...)

34.15 - Army Helicopters
34.65 - Army Helicopters
34.75 - Army Helicopters
41.50 - Army Helicopter Towers
118.000-121.400 - Air Traffic Control (Towers/ARTCC's)
121.500 - Emergencies
121.600 - C.A.P. Training Beacons
121.650 - Ground Control
121.700 - Ground Control
121.750 - Ground Control
121.775 - C.A.P. Training Beacons
121.800 - Ground Control
121.850 - Ground Control
121.900 - Ground Control
121.950 - Flight Schools
121.975 - Flight Service Stations
122.000 - Flight Advisory Service
122.025-122.675 - Flight Service Stations

 

 

Title: Just a little greeting card to the US aviation experts.  
          

Back to Part 37

 

 
 

End of extra text.

  Homepage         Disclaimer to these pages        Part XXXVI        Part XXXVII      Index to birth of Kweb

 

 

 

 

_____________________________________________________________