(Saturday 06 Nov 17.25 hours) Well here it is: The first Civil Bloody Day is located at 16 November so in 10 days already. The first CBD is at 16 Nov (the test date was at 07 Sept this year). I just received and opened an envelope and in it is a letter saying the civil case is at 16 Nov in Arnhem, Holland. It is not that difficult to estimate what will happen; the (governmental) opponent has thrown in an amazing amount of lawyer work hours, not normal hours but paid at 500 to 1000 Euro / hour.

Why this Dutch government does this I do not know, I do not understand. It will be bloody and it is the first CBD after seven MBD's on a row that, for example, partially gave rise to the Iraqi cell structure. With just a little bit of sadness in my heart I will hit the 'publish website' button in a few moments; good luck to all who need it & the kind of targets needed are well known I hope. Good luck.

__________________________

Even if bin Laden had a nuclear weapon, he probably wouldn't have used it for a lack of proper religious authority - authority he has now. "[Bin Laden] secured from a Saudi sheik...a rather long treatise on the possibility of using nuclear weapons against the Americans," says Scheuer. "[The treatise] found that he was perfectly within his rights to use them. Muslims argue that the United States is responsible for millions of dead Muslims around the world, so reciprocity would mean you could kill millions of Americans," Scheuer tells Kroft.

Comment: Why don't the Americans study their own 'decision to use the nuke'? There is a well developed body of historical writings inside the USA upon their own decision to use it.
Furthermore; when you have such a weapon it is only normal that one seeks validation of reasoning in using this. When you have a set of standard human morals and values in your brain, you do not trust only yourself when unleashing a thing like this.

For myself speaking; a few years back I asked for blasting stuff like that in the Rocky Mountains because the message would be understood anyway. Now I have left this position, it can make sense to wipe out a town inside the USA. This makes sense. 

In terror expert circles there is some feared theory. It goes like this: At first the terrorists do set off a nuke in one city. After that they start making demands and if the demands are not met within one or two weeks, another city will get nuked. This is a stupid theory, this is only a stupid Hollywood movie script. Reality is different, please adopt to reality.

Comment: Until now it was always told that smallpox was wiped out from humanity. That means there are no people on this planet that actually have this nasty disease. So how can they test if drugs against this horrible disease work good? I don't get this in detail, may be I am to stupid to understand this. May be I am to stupid.
Shall I indulge into propaganda and ask the USA if this was one of the reasons they needed those ghost detainees in Iraq in the first place? Or can I trust the USA on her good intentions this time?

This all is a bizarre development, elementary logic tells us that in a war on terror this kind of stuff should be destroyed. In front of the cameras the political leaders of the countries where the smallpox stockpiles still exist always state they are standing 'shoulder to shoulder'. 
But instead of destruction the world health organization (a department in the united nations as all operatives know) does the opposite and gives the green glowing light to experiments.

So why do they do this? The only logical and solid reason can be that there is another stock pile somewhere. Or, both stock pile keepers are unsure if there is not another pile. Whatever the intel is on this, just destroy it and if there is indeed another stockpile left just hope and pray that your example will get followed. That would be political leadership in this war on terror but like in most similar cases this will not happen. 

At last to the genetic operatives: Of course I want designer diseases working in the ways of this story, of course I want this applied when needed. And when military axioms are still not smithed around ways of keeping warfare outside civil areas, stuff like this is needed every now and then.
Yet it has all to fall within other military axioms, or better said, other axioms must always get appliance too when relevant. Remember for example the fundamental axiom that says that when over one percent of the population is wiped out, international organizations have a right to interfere in this. 
There is plenty of stuff to investigate for the genetic operatives, non lethals are a good start by the way. But smallpox will always be forbidden.

Please let me inform you that if circumstances change may be the boycott is dropped (although at the moment this scenario seems very unlikely.) Furthermore a similar policy to election day like in Afghanistan will be applied, that means no (or little) attacks during the actual elections. This to avoid unnecessary civil victims.

Yet for me it is hard to imagine that the entire future parliament will not get executed when it makes sense to keep on with the boycott. Please don't get me wrong Mr. Sistani, I am definitely in favor of some kind of democracy in that what Muslims often refer to as the modern Caliphate. And indeed this implies that inside Iraq the Shia will have majority of parliament and therefore will be a major force in local politics. Don't get we wrong on that one.

So a bit more unity in Iraq would be handy, policies maximizing civil war are not handy. There can only be civil war against this present interim government, that is in fact no more than a so called puppet government (although some individuals in it might have good intentions flowing from lack of knowledge in the broader war on terror.)

Furthermore it is important to remark that when you Sistani would have succeeded into getting elections much sooner, I would have cooperated definitely. But it didn't happen that way, it didn't happen that way. Also your statements of clergy being not too political didn't fall on deaf ears on my side, indeed clergy must give advice. And, of course, clergy must always have the right to give a good earwash to strange talking political figures. But these are all future developments, right now it still looks best all in all in this entire war to boycott the impending elections. 

Think Sistani, think. I wish you luck in your thinking.

(At last, I did not know that already on dates like October 28 it was in the news that you gave full support to this interim government. Sorry, this had skipped my attention. Sorry, my excuse is that Iraq is just one country and beside the countries there are lots of other battlefields where the Americans are found...)   

After that the group enters the mosque, one of the marines suddenly yells "He is fucking breathing, the guy is fucking pretending to be dead." Then at a short distance he shoots the wounded guy dead. 

That's the story in  a nutshell. 

Comment: The so called 'judicial experts' upon the law of armed conflict say that it all has to do with being the five wounded people having the status prisoner yes or no. But the reports also indicate that the day before another group of marines had a bit of fire from that mosque, after that the US marines killed ten of those inside and left five wounded behind. The five wounded were even given medical treatment. 

In my simple minded view it cannot be anything else than with the act of giving medical aid, the status of POW or a similar status is at hand. They were prisoners one way or the other (may be 'immobilized' on purpose but that's another judicial problem). That's one.

The fact that one day before one US soldier died from some suicide act emerging from another wounded enemy fighter is completely not relevant. To be honest, when US marines can't stand the heat they must stay out of the kitchen. After all this is a so called 'voluntary army', when military recruiters recruit shit, you get battlefield shit. That's two. 

Next is that this time it's in front of the camera, in general people avoid bad behavior in front of the camera. Over time there are much more reports indicating that the behavior as shown in this mosque is in fact standard behavior. From statistical considerations it is highly likely that many dozens of cases like this have happened during this week of Fallujah fighting.
And this is only Fallujah, likely this kind of behavior is going on for a long time already. And when one of those old anecdotes come along, the standard reaction of the US military is "This is not documented." That's always the end of the anecdote... That's three.

Number four: It is also well known that this US government lives in some 'bubble', that means they have limited view on reality and work from assumptions that are often a clear contradiction of that thing we usually refer to as 'reality'. Guys like the USA secretary of defense, Mr. Donald Rumsfeld truly think his guys do some heroic job. They really believe that... 

There are war correspondents in Iraq who look for any incident that they can turn against our American soldiers and use to discredit the Bush administration's policies in Iraq.
In this latest incident, the action of one Marine who was in the midst of a violent house-to-house firefight has been blown into an international event. Never mind that the terrorist who was killed was using the refuge of a Mosque to fire upon the Marine and his comrades.

These liberal news people are doing more to inflame the hatred of the Muslim world against America than any other factor. 

One thing is certain: Had these people reported the invasion of Europe during World War II in this way, we would all be speaking German now. 

I do hope that Americans will respond with outrage to this slander of one of our brave Marines. These brave young men face dangers daily that would send most Americans into a nervous breakdown. Let's not reward their sacrifice and bravery with an indictment for being a "war criminal."

Comment: This guy Hal is confusing the sound of bullets with an attack. In fact there was a marine inside the mosque to execute the remaining five wounded. Only after that this whole incident was video taped, only after that my dear Hal.

Also this Hal figure is someone who likely thinks that the Vietnam war was lost because of the media reports. And if there would be liberal media in Europe during world war two we all would speak German now. No proof of this all is given of course, this constantly 'no proof given' is an important characteristic of the enemy and is one more argument in favor of nuking America. 

-Arty: Opinion on the US election?

-Reinko: Compared to the Madrid paella from March 11 (with up to 8.5% swing voters on a net basis), it is estimated that the result of the Osama video is something like 2% swing in favor of father George.

This implicates that it is highly likely that George Dubya would not have won the popular vote without the Osama tape. On the other hand it is almost impossible to validate the 2% net swing estimation. Also the success in drumming up the conservative base gives some 'swing' from non voters to conservatives.

Most Europeans are highly disappointed in this election result, that means they still see the Americans as some kind of friends. In the next four years they can learn they are very wrong on that. 

America must be kicked out of NATO, European defense budget must double and economical sanctions must be enforced on the USA . 

That's my opinion.

"Sen. Kerry clearly believes not only is it the security issue that cost him the election, but very specifically the Usama tapes coming out in the 11th hour," Rivera reported Friday.

Kerry also acknowledged that the security issue in general hurt him in the race, Rivera said.

The broadcast of the tape from the Al Qaeda leader jolted the campaign's closing days, accentuating the terrorism theme with a reminder of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Comment: Almost no comments from my side, only that this is again one reason in favor of nuking America. Of course timing is important for the nuking question, but when just a lousy tape has such a nice workout the nuke stuff can be trusted... And I mean this; suppose there is a nuking attack via the suit case bomb method, what country will feel the fist of the US military? (No country of course, there would be limited reason found inside any country...)

After my humble opinion the Americans will leave the international scene for a few years and in the end this is far more better.  

Comment: The Iraqi demographics are not that sharp in my mind, lets say it's 26 million people. Well 5.8 billion divided by 26 million gives 223 US$ a citizen a month. So the Iraqis have to know that for every Iraqi there is inside Iraq, every month an amount of 223 US$ is used to 'help' them.

Although this American government thinks tax cuts are good because the public is better in spending money compared to any kind of government, in Iraq another kind of logic is applied. Money for bullets (=security) is now the favorite line of reasoning.

Comment: The fresh wounds of those other wounded were done by another bunch of brave marines that just visited the mosque before. It is not that very famous quote from that marine that shot the last wounded guy (He's fucking faking to be dead, he is fucking faking!' And a few seconds later that fucking faker has met Allah too... 
Compare this for example the way private Jessica Lynch was treated, just compare.
Also take in your mind that mass hysteria that suddenly opened in the American media landscape that here wounds were partially consistent and coherent of anal rape. (Thus suggesting she was anally raped first and got her bones broken later...).

The above quote was found on a website named hundredpercenter dot blogspot dot com (motto: For love of God and Country), I just proceed quoting the paragraph next to the quoted here above: 

Notice how Mr. Sites is making a stink over injured enemy combatants being left in the Mosque. Perhaps, he would have preferred the U.S. to stop the offensive to save the lives of all the injured terrorists who killed scores of America's sons.

Comment: Again in the building up of a moral case of 'nuking America' it is important to observe there is utter lack of the old rules of warfare known as the Geneva rules. (I want to rewrite these rules but that's not relevant right now.) And of course just a lousy website, just a simple blogspot writer cannot be a valid argument in favor of nuking America.

No, the fact that when you type in the search phrase 'Kevin Sites' in that internet news outlet search machine you get 1670 'hits' from news files. And then the words from that hundredpercenter comes floating above (meaning that 'news article' or 'editorial' gets the most hits from internet users), that is one detail in favor of nuking America.

For completeness: The title of the news article was: Making matters worse-Again. (So a lot of Americans who hang on to the 'media fault' theory upon why they lost the Vietnam war might be lured into reading that familiar wisdom... I dunno, I only know it's one detail more in favor of nuking America. Also neglecting even to mention that Geneva rules exists is just a bridge too far. 

Comment: The present CIA is on the air force budget, lots of these air forces budgetees do not run around in some kind of uniform. When these 'non combattants' hire (bribe) foreigners into service, also these bribed people will wear no uniform. Also, CIA employees (and hired agents) who work in foreign countries will often deny they are into some organized command structure. So is FOX news telling me it is no problemo to kill like this?

And after all, we must never forget who had the biggest finger in writing these Geneva rules for war. That were in large part the Americans and now the war landscape changes just a tiny bit they all suddenly have all kinds of problems with it...

So is this another argument in the case of nuking America because FOX news is the biggest news outlet? Hardly, FOX news is just as 'smart' as some local city newspaper over here. We must not nuke for simple minded people like this. We must nuke for the smart people in America that silently give approval for FOX news reports like this, that is what must happen. 

In the Iraqi equation there is a lot to say:

Reports indicate that no one has the power to ask for postponing the 30 Jan elections, so I simply say it would be very wise to postpone these elections. Seventeen political parties in Iraq (Sunni & Kurds) are already asking for this and I agree.

A message to the Shia clergymen: I have decided to forgive Sistani with his fatwa, the content was very good but the timing of 30 January is not. Please no bullshit any more like "Postponing elections would be rewarding the insurgency" because with or without elections the so called insurgency will keep on attacks.
The only difference is that on the actual election day, surprise surprise, no attacks will be there. When I ask this at the Sunni clergy they often inform the 'evil terrorists' on this.

Well Sistani, I have forgiven you because that development inside the Shia completely skipped my attention. This was my fault therefore I cannot blame you. Also the historical development of Iraq is not 100% unknown to me, I am well aware of the needs to get good and real elections. But 30 January is too late in many senses and too early in others. If a five or six months delay is there, the boycott could be lifted you know. Plus you have the benefits of no attacks on that day, am I clear?

Furthermore the Iraqi Shia have to take into account that I am very responsible for the situation Iraq is in right now; After all it was me, Reinko Venema, that did give the Americans permission in the Summer of 2002 to start war against Iraq. At the time it was the only way to lift the economical sanctions against Iraq, that was a fact because we all know how the Americans are.
How I arrived in that 'war advisory role' is not relevant right here, relevant is that 30 January will get boycotted (thus maximizing the likelihood of civil war) while with postponement stuff could be looked up upon again.

Now the Fallujah equation: Reported today were a mere 150 to 175 surviving families in Fallujah (that looks a bit of a low survival rate but anyway, the Red Cresent reported it). Needless to say the '2000 dead report' from this Iraqi interim government does not look very credible. It is just not credible, more emerging statistics need to be studied on this one. It is well known how the Americans are, only 2000 is just not a credible number...
(Update: Only ten hours later the Red Cresent reported a 6000 number, again it can be much more then this. But it is good a triple emerges that shows the US-led propaganda is crap.)

Of course the operatives will understand that in case this Fallujah death toll will top 10 thousand, the old wisdom of a city for a city (or a village for a village) have to be applied. The Americans knew before the raiding of Fallujah they could suffer consequences like this, they neglected that old wisdom and gambled stuff in the wrong way. Right now it looks realistic to say that (civil) death toll will top 10 thousand so we are looking at a 3 to 4 entire 'WTC units'. And for what? For what did this happen?   

Comment: This is just a lovely incident, but my dear IDF is it really an incident or just a sample of a wide pattern? And I am not asking this from a simple minded Israel=enemy kind of view, facts are that I have asked the IDF two times on a row (right now) to withhold attacks.
And facts are there was indeed a gathering of officers enforcing that what you folks call the 'purity of arms'. That is a positive development, I cannot deny this.
Also facts are that when I ask two times on a row at some army to do something, this can only be interpreted as some formal request (an order if you like) from the WarTribunal.

All I say right now is that the meeting was a good idea but likely there were some IDF officers who missed some points. Please correct this minor mistake, it cannot be that formal request are somewhere stopped in your chain of command. Am I clear?

Proceed the nice quotes: 

"If we allow Jewish soldiers to put an Arab violinist at a roadblock and laugh at him, we have succeeded in arriving at the lowest moral point possible. Our entire existence in this Arab region was justified, and is still justified, by our suffering; by Jewish violinists in the camps."

Comment: No comment, my request is clear I just guess. 

Comment: Just like me you just don't believe what you read here.  

AY informed me that mobile Bedouin (nomads) living in the isolated areas of Tharthar in the desert of Sammar and Hiran desert valley discovered many American bodies in their signature black plastic bags by accident. They noticed a sudden increase in the number of wolves roaming those areas. They soon discovered remains of dead bodies that caused a large number of wolves to establish residency in those areas. Nomads in those areas collected the remains and buried them in mass graves out of respect for the dead and also to rid the areas of unwanted large population of wolves. Did American commanders want wolves to eat the bodies of their dead comrades in order to destroy the evidence of their savage crime?

Comment: But after fishermen with strange stories there are also Bedouin observing strange packs of wolves. And again: Do you believe the Americans are dumping dead corpses above the deserts and rivers? Who could believe stuff like that, only a lunatic could. Or not? 

I then went to Baghdad University. At the entrance to Baghdad University there is an American tank positioned there for security. One of the tank crew is a female soldier who developed a friendship with the sister of my driver. I let my driver’s sister ask her friend, the American soldier, this question on my behalf: How could America, the land of civilization and human rights allow for disposing of dead bodies of their comrades in rivers and remote desert locations? The American soldier replied in an arrogant and angry manner.

Comment: The phrase 'the war is over' this soldier mentions is related to Mr. George W. Bush standing on that aircraft carrier ship (in a flight suit) declaring major warfare is over in Iraq. Likely mercenary contracts were build on this in the judicial sense, later (after the 'major warfare' being over) they got 'other contracts'.

Again: Do I believe what I am writing myself here? This is one hundred percent absurd. This is madness but it has it's own logic in it all. I like it.

Statement: I am well aware of the amount of gossip that goes around in platoons, companies, regiments and so. When I was a draftee myself, I often did receive the command for replacement of our company hours in advance. I did handle the telex, the field phones, the radio and stuff like that. It was my task to inform the company leader of this, sometimes I informed my dear officer as soon as possible and at other times I made him sweat from the short timespan I gave him (after all I could easily retype the message with a different 'delivery time' in it...)
And when I knew that in two and a half hours time we would go South East approximately 7 kilometers, it was always fun to observe the gossip going round. Sergeant This thought in a hour 5 kilometers North while lieutenant That found wisdom in 3 kilometers South in just a half hour from now. I have learned a lot from that, never trust gossip and above all try to find out what is gossip and what not.

But here we have Iraqi fishermen, Iraqi Bedouins and US military. Three completely different social groups. If this is gossip it is very solid gossip. And it still has it's own logic in it; the families of those illegal people in America will not complain. That can't because they will put out of the country and therefore will never get to know the truth. It has it's own logic, it is all so much Americans are.

After all, there are also 300 thousand military homeless vets roaming the streets of America... 

"It is the first time since the Vietnam war that the American army has suffered such a huge number of wounded soldiers on a daily basis" added the officer. "We are frustrated, especially that the war is supposed to have ended after removing Saddam. There is no justification for this continued hostility that results in daily loss of lives to the point that forces our commanders to resort to a savage and most inhumane way to destroy dead bodies in order to hide the real cost of this war. The American medical services branch of the U.S. Army, housed in the Allied Forces command center in Baghdad has become the most secretive center in order to prevent the real numbers of dead and wounded Americans from reaching the rest of the soldiers and officers in Iraq".

Comment: Again this is just a completely unbelievable story. You just do not believe this, dumping dead bodies in rivers and over deserts. Yet my dear reader, how did we react when the concentration camps came out during world war two? People knew the rumors for years but they just could not believe it. Just like this it is beyond comprehension. 

On the other hand, what else explains the gap in reported death toll? The gap is there for a long time and what else can explain this gap? Illegal aliens living inside America are the perfect catch for a 'professional army'. Or not?

And beside this all there are lots of reports that say the 'civil contractors' are kept out of the media files, only Halliburton publishes totals (and the names only if the families approve). Most American companies operating in Iraq do not publish death toll of their workers, there are lots and lots of American 'security contractors' (often former US military) that also go unaccounted for after dying.

Look at the way the concept of 'wounded in action' is treated: It is in the most strict sense possible, when an Iraqi succeeds into luring a US soldier into a road accident it is indeed counted as a road accident. Now we are only waiting to get car bombs also given the status 'road accident', it is just what your perception on reality is. After all they say BOOM on the road...