The birth of the Kweb.

          

      Homepage       Disclaimer to these pages                  Part XXXVII          Part XXXIX              Index to birth of Kweb

Dear readers, I have changed this page into a series of pages. 
Mostly on a monthly bases, so now we have October 2004.
Look at the index of these pages!

Part XXXVIII: October 2004:

  

 

   

Introduction:

To readers who are new to this story: You are now in part XXXVIII of the Birth of the Kweb, the Kweb is of course the KinkyWeb&is this website. This website is good&strong, it's some fine piece of art. Sometimes I write a bit rough on some subjects, but that's the way it is. If you don't like that you get to some other PolitcalCorrect website please!
If you are new, you have to know that almost all things I do write on this website do have some nasty habit of coming out. To avoid judicial shit I had to place some disclaimers, here is the disclaimer to this story.  

Also it is wise to read the Introduction to the stories, here I spell out some words that frequently appear in the stories, for example the SilverBullet. Who is the SilverBullet do you think? If you don't know read the Introduction to TheStoriesProject

      

05 Oct 2004: To my words from yesterday, as written on the homepage, I have nothing to add. I hope that the so called international community this time can deliver better compared to all those promises made to the Afghanis, the money numbers promised to compared that what delivered speak for themselves. I have nothing to add, the bombings will continue. Quote from the yesterday words:

(Monday 04 Oct 2004) A few weeks ago when I read it for the first time I just did not believe it. I thought these are a few weird journalists that are trapped in a science fiction story, I thought it can't be true because this is the ultimate killer application towards the Afghanistan puppy growth problem.

Today I found it is not a fairy tale, it is for real. It was even in the 23 September edition of the science journal Nature. They do exist, addiction free opium puppies. It is a kind of mutant puppy first discovered in 1995 and could give rise to new high value medicine... This is the killer application for the Afghani so called 'problem associated with drugs production', any idiot can see that. Just ask the average Afghani farmer what they would like to grow given equal kilo prices. 

Any idiot can see this. And when there is even pharmaceutical industry build near Kabul even a realistic Afghan university would become real after some years or at most two decades. You know those things that even have a mathematics department. 

A few Australians found these 'addiction free puppies', they listen to the names of Larkin and Millgate (likely there are a few more that contributed). And how will the Australians deal with this killer application? Well, my guess is they will do their very best to keep production of the puppy variant limited to Tasmania (Australian territory) and in the meantime play the staunch ally in the WarOnTerror and TheWarOnDrugs. That is likely how it will go, killer application or not. 

There is money to be made so all stupid fantasies I might have upon Kabul universities will never emerge, there will be only crap from prime minister Howard saying 'We were attacked by evil' and words like that. And my very words 'killer application' will get the usual sour turn in some time, the bombings will continue. 

May I ask the Australian scientific community to stand up to their responsibilities? I know it is hard for private companies to indulge in Afghan stuff  because when your destiny is Afghanistan (on your plane ticket) secret services will grab you from the waiting line to ask why you 'go there'. Australians must simply neglect the stupid Americans because Americans have low moral values and too much corruption. This is also are more or less formal order from the so called WarTribunal, I cannot guarantee a 100% bomb free environment in Afghanistan but I can definitely ask some folks there to withhold attacks... ;)

That is all I have to say, these addiction free opium poppies (that have the nickname Norman) are a killing application one way or the other. At last, may I ask my dear reader to email these very words a bit round to the places that need it? Thanks for your attention and help, the formal order is thus to build a realistic pharmaceutical factory in Afghanistan (just 50% stock ownership to the Afghan government and 50% to Australian or whatever sources...) 

Title: Millgate & Larkin cannot enter the sniper list because they are scientists.
  Look whis is on the sniper list...  Look whis is on the sniper list...  Look whis is on the sniper list...  

By the way my dear reader, don't you think that it is rather strange that beside possible new future medicines also no share of the 'legal opium production' is given to the Afghans? Doesn't this once more make clear that our political leaders only tell good sounding crap that makes everyone happy for a short time?
Doesn't this once more make clear we must kill Americans into the thousands and hundreds of thousands? We must be reasonable and stop killing after the 3 million threshold is taken, but America needs it and in the end it will be better for humanity. 

There is no denying this, if even until now after all these false promises of help to the Afghanis there is even not a small slice of legal opium production given, the only way is the way of blood. Not to much blood and not to little, otherwise you cannot read the words of the story written and that is unhandy...

Or is my dear reader still indulging in stupid fantasies like 'Always try dialog first!' kind of stuff? Well, why don't you give it a try? Give it a try, try to dialog with Americans, you will fail... 

Till updates, have a nice life or try to get one. 

06 Oct 2004: Upon the operation OneHundredOrMorePlanesDown (technical details outlined in this extra text to 16 September) I placed a second update. It is around the disruption of radar, but problem with this is I do hardly know fundamental details of radar technology. 
Can you blind the radar of civil air craft airports? Just by overloading the receiving antenna with a beam transmitter? This could very well be, the operatives must be creative because I just lack all kinds of insight into the technical details you need to know for that. But it is hard to imagine that disruption of radar is never studied, but military studies likely imply a large distance from the enemy radar while in the civil world you can come very close to it...

But, there is no denying this, with a similar amount of money as used in the famous nine eleven 2001 attacks, one could bring over one hundred planes down inside America. A hundred planes or more on the same day would be over 25 times as efficient compared to 9/11, this is simply important given the study of asymmetric warfare. And with a bit of luck even no martyrs are needed for this one, this is a very interesting operation. 

So far the OneHundredOrMorePlanesDown operation. 

__________________________

Of course, no day is complete if we have not addressed one of the American problems, since they give me day in day out an overwhelming amount of ammo to use against them I have to be selective...

So this day I will only look at the general cognitive functioning of top American government officials, today we take a look at Mr. Dick Cheney the vice president of America. Lately he had a television debate with the vice presidential hopeful Mr. Edwards, let me not comment upon the entire 'debate' they had but zoom in on a small detail that very likely will be believed by the American conservative voters:

According to Mr. Dick Cheney there were ongoing ties between al Qaida and Iraq.

So the whole of American government did skip the facts that already a long long time ago Saddam was classified as some infidel. I totally agree with this classification, Saddam was just to stupid to make a success of Iraq.
But from Mr. Dick Cheney it is known that he holds on to 'insights' long after all other people have found 'other truth'. To show you the very limited brains of this conservative government (that has the largest army on earth under it's ass) take again a look at the so called Iraqi bio-chemical van as pictured below.

Any idiot with only minimal brains can see in just a few seconds that these cannot be mobile bio-chemical production facilities because the wind can blow through... It is no rocket science to see that, in June 2003 this photo came available in the Media. Yet on 22 January 2004 Mr. Dick Cheney still spoke upon 'found' bio-chemical trailers, a guy in his position is a danger to other countries, just a raw and lethal danger. 

Title: Dick Cheney knows truly nothing upon safety in mobile bio-chemical vans.
        

But there is also funny update on that; When I emailed the Pentagon last April that I was thinking upon the starting up of designer diseases, the Pentagon let actually go out a Media release that said: 'The actual use of these trailers is still not clear.

It was definitely funny to observe that the American military forces use the same way of communicating with me as the operatives do... But it was sad that the American military forces simply do not stand up towards their own responsibilities. Military responsibilities are simply different from political responsibilities, but they did not correct the crap Mr. Dick Cheney was telling. And that is America these years, when political leadership is hanging on to insights that are baseless, the rest of America provides a basis for these insights. 
That is why I say they are corrupt and the corruption is located within politics. 

07 Oct 2004: Beside the use of concrete and train rails (second hand and cheap infrastructure stuff) that can be used in the making of efficient protection against the American bunker busters, there is another material that might be very good and relatively cheap to counter the bunker busters.
More is in the update upon efficient bunker design... 

__________________________

09 Oct 2004: Oopsie toopsie tralala... Two days ago and within one hour after I finally published the Taliban & al Qaida project, there was BIG BOOM against Zionists in Egypt... Of course the Israelis will understand that from the judicial point of view this all is very coincidental. Or not Israel?

Also, again from the judicial point of view, the very words that hang at the end of the BigStory for six weeks have nothing to do with little boom in Egypt. Any Israeli and American official will understand that.  (Quote:)

Finally that Taliban project needs to be written and after that the Palestines 
must be getting a place in the spotlights. 

So although reality folded itself with high speed around the story written, from the judicial point of view it is all coincidental. 

Also, after attacks have been staged, it is important to study the official reaction. One of the Israeli officials stated, from the theatre of the comical and absurd, that it were in fact the Palestines that exported the method of suicide bombings all over the world...
The fact that the Japanese invented the method of suicide aircraft is of course filtered out of these simple minds, the political statements made must be as simple as possible otherwise the average voter doesn't understand it.
The fact that there is a long history of suicide attacks dating back to far before the founding of the Muslim faith and that military historians view this often as a by product of military imbalance? The American and Israeli officials don't know what you are talking about. When it doesn't fit in the American agenda, it is just neglected.   
Also the fact that there is a new military axiom at the scene that says when there is too much collateral damage done there is blasting back by definition, is just to difficult to understand for the IDF and the US military. These 'professional soldiers' truly believe it is GOOD fighting EVIL. 

Please Israelis deal with reality, attacks staged against Israel are more or less a normal price for occupation. Please deal with simple reality before reality deals with you. In the long run you cannot win this. Elementary demographic considerations and easy to understand future military extrapolation say that two plus two equals four and you must give up the occupation in case you want to keep your nation state. Please deal with reality...

__________________________

In another development the Afghan (first round) of presidential elections was happily accompanied by a low level of violence. That was good, that was fine and I got a bit emotional over that. Thanks to the Afghanis!
The Afghanis must know that so called democracy is not a system that will bring above the best possible leader, it is a way to get rid of lousy leaders. And, most of all, it is a way to prevent civil war in countries. 
Furthermore take into account that all countries that have been run for a long time with only one 'strong leader' (a dictator) often underperform. Here in Europe too, for example Spain was run a long time by a guy named Francisco Franco. Well in the end before he died, Spain was in a lousy economical position. In the end with macho leaders ruling decade in decade out, the whole country starts deteriorating. Low level of science, bad moral in armies, bad economical development, more and more corruption and so on and so on. 

Dictators can be helpful sometimes but only for a short period, in the long run they always fail. The ego has grown to big and they think that without them the country will fade to rubbish. Or, as in the case of the Saddam Hussein figure, they are not sure of their own lives in case they step down from power. 

No, there are not many cases filed in history where strong leaders were good in the long run. We do not need strong leaders, we need smart leaders who understand the complexities of societies. Not only their own society but also grasp how other societies are, but facts are facts and also in so called democratic societies these people come not floating above. A simple counter example is the American 'puppet democracy' where the way you look is far more important then what you think. But lets the ugly American society out of this little advertisement for some kind of democracy, bah Americans... 

Now we turn to the Media report of this day, the Afghan elections were indeed a soft landing today but given the situation in Iraq I still think it is much better to boycott the January elections. One of the reasons is that I think that the present prime minister, the Allawi figure, is indeed a classical puppet of the Americans (even the speech he gave before the American congress was partially written by an American speech writer, he doesn't speak his own words.) But Mr. Allawi (in case he gets to read this) is not a coward I think, if that reported axe attack against him is indeed true, he is definitely not a coward. 

No, the reason that the January elections in Iraq must be boycotted is a moral reason. The whole of Western society is just not capable of making an excuse towards the Iraqis for those one million + deaths from the economical sanctions. We observe all kinds of bizarre reasoning in the diverse countries, but in the Media report below we can observe the most idiot reasoning till thus:

Media report to 09 October 2004: 'No apology necessary' on Iraq

THE Federal Government had nothing to apologize for despite a new report finding no evidence that Iraq produced weapons of mass destruction after 1991, Deputy Prime Minister John Anderson said today.

Mr. Anderson said the Government relied on intelligence available at the time of invading Iraq which was then undisputed.

"We responded, and I think this is overwhelmingly accepted by Australians, to the advice that was given to us that at the time was not challenged even by the critics of engagement with Iraq including of course France, Germany and Russia," Mr. Anderson said.

"What do you apologize for when you've done nothing wrong?

"We did not mislead the Australian people on this and I don't believe the Australian people believe we misled them."

Comment: Also Australians spoke words like 'no apologize needed' because the letter of international law was followed. This kind of behavior is rather human, it looks a lot like somebody who accidentally kills one of the kids of a neighbor and when confronted with the parents this person only says 'I never broke any traffic rule'. 
And a year later, at every occasion this comes along, the person only says 'I never broke any traffic rule, it was an accident'. And that person, who was already known for it's reckless driving, did indeed drive at 48 or 49 kilometer / hour in small streets and indeed the letter of the law says that 50 kilometer / hour is the maximum there. But people like that are fake people, just fake people. 

After my humble opinion, all those Iraqi deaths from the economical sanctions were not some 'traffic accident'. I think the main factor is the way America views the rest of the world, they came up with all that 'evil dual use' concepts and in the end the Iraqis could not even import water pumps because in theory you could pump poison with it.
This was not only an intelligence failure, also all media outlets contributed to that stream of hysteria. Just read a few old media files with all kinds of fantasies that were going round upon Iraq. Even before the 9/11 investigation committee some female gave testimony, that female had written a book or a set of articles around the subject of al Qaida being no more then some outlet of the Iraqi secret service. Of course it is utter madness, but she testified before that committee while this very committee did not investigate in the so called 'religious trigger hypothesis' (that would only hinder the American military fantasies that make it so logical to bomb around like full blown idiots).
It is also clear that America is not changing at all, it stays the same. It does not transform, it is not a 'free nation' as they think they are. I have arrived at the conclusion that it is best to kill them into the thousands and hundreds of thousands, only the deepest of despair into that country will bring the change needed. 

Title: Entire American teams could not interpret the facts as found on the ground.
        

Next country: China. The Dragon, message to Mr. Hu Jintao; Are the reports of only 40 new made military helicopters a year true? This looks far to low for a country your size, better scale this up to 100+ new made military helicopters a year is the advice of the WarTribunal. By the way Chinese army, that military exercise from end September lately was indeed impressive and it was wise to have some international observers around. The 'show what you have got' is far wiser compared to hide all kinds of stuff. (From a military point of view this is not always correct of course, it is important that actual battlefield performance is even better than all military exercises, but from the political point of view it is better if the foreigners know what the possibilities are. So these are indeed different responsibilities, openness versus actual battlefield surprises delivered.)

Beside the actual Chinese armed forces, the PLA, on another battlefield the Chinese are very vulnerable. Just read this easy to understand quote:

At the end of 2000, China's foreign exchange reserve was US$165.6 billion. By the end of 2002, it rocketed to US$286.4 billion before it soared to US$403.3 billion by the end of 2003. By the end of June this year, the reserve was registered at a staggering US$470.6 billion.

Comment: This is not very wise Mr. Hu Jintao (and other Chinese people too). Because after my humble opinion the US$ is still overvalued by at least five percent and at most ten to twelve percent against the average foreign currency.

You better start selling that stuff or hedging it's value (but hedging 470 billion is expensive too...). So why do you do this China? Why do you keep such numbers and such a one sided portfolio in foreign money?
This is not some advertisement for the Euro currency, this is asking why you are that stupid.
Well, what is your answer on this? 

End to the writings of this day, think with light my dear reader & slam wood with an axe.   

10 Oct 2004: Today I took a small walk of something like two hours and you know my dear reader, I constantly had a little smile on my face. And before I took that walk I looked a bit at the television and on the CableNewsNetwork there was that female journalist Christiane Armanpour and she gave a row of rationales that tried to explain the low level of violence in the Afghanistan elections yesterday.

The rationales given by CNN's Christiane were a true and fundamental exercise in comedy and this day it was real funny because it went about less violence instead of more. It is always so funny when Western journalists try to describe actions or non actions of the so called Mujahedin. With all their 'superior knowledge' most Western journalists truly do not understand the relatively beautiful inner workings of an average mujahedin brain.
Lots of these Western journalists think that when there are a few American AC-130 gunships flying above, that that is a reason for withholding attacks... These journalists do not understand that when these guys tunnel into action, no Western technology can stop that. And with just a silly potato knife, in the end the average mujahedin can do more damage then a Western soldier with a sword.
We must take into account that mujahedin folks can endure real battlefield stress, when for example on a nasty day half of a platoon is wiped out, the next day they still have solid battlefield performance. Ha! Compare that to the average Dutch platoon, just do that. Will an average Dutch platoon have serious battlefield performance the day after wiping out half of that platoon? Now Christiane, will they? 

But these are not the years of broad based attacks inside Afghanistan, these are the years that Afghanis must learn how to read and write. These are the years that one way or the other some serious economical development is needed inside Afghanistan and I hope they will get a serious slice of legal opium production for delivery at pharmaceutical industries. And I hope that there will emerge even pharmaceutical industry inside Afghanistan, the benefits are clear because with just a few international registered medicines there is multi billion a year income. 

A problem with eventual big economical growth inside Afghanistan is clear, it must not end in shit like the Saudi equation. But I am very upbeat upon this because after all those war years the average Afghani has relatively high moral values. There is no denying this, I like them because of that. My dear Christiane Armanpour, to us as average westerners it is indeed strange to let the females walk around like blue walking tents. Yet things go only different there, it is not evil, it is different. 

In the meantime and over the decades, the Afghani mujahedin must take into account that economical growth brings great danger to the actual battlefield performance the day after half of a platoon is wiped out. Just like the new born cell structure in Iraq must guard for traitors, you must keep up long term guarding of erosion of actual battlefield performance. This is a decade long request, you know the historical lessons from the Mongol Djenghiz Khan have not fallen on deaf ears on my behalf. And after that Mongol guy died, the Mongol empire started crashing. 
It is not for nothing that I say that I am not important, it are the policies that count. Good working policies can survive for decades while individual people only live for decades, it is as simple as it is.

After all this 'military preaching' it is about time to give a good and realistic battlefield advice at the Palestine Hamas. It is very funny to see that the Israelis cannot retaliate instantly after those funny attacks at that Israeli Sinai holiday place and that Hilton hotel. Here is the advice again: 

In the Media files there was a long stream of Hamas statements observed circling around the idea there will be no export of Israeli security problems outside the usual areas. 
From the political point of view these are wise words, keep them repeating but when speaking it they must get political realness in the long run.

Also from the moral point of view it is important to keep attacks limited geographically.

But the whole shit is that I do not understand from the military point of view, why America delivers these thousands of precision bombs to Israel. I do not understand why America thinks it is in their 'strategical' and 'tactical' interests that these weapons are delivered. Compared to just 3 years ago, the scaling up to many thousands of precision bombs is a tremendous scaling up.

You must know Hamas that I just do not trust the political powers of Israel for the full 100% in this. And I do not trust the Israeli Defense Forces for the full 100% in this. The intellectual level of politics inside Israel, it is just too low, I do not trust it for the full 100%. The Iranian & Syrian rationale mentioned doesn't make much military sense doesn't it?

So my military advice is and stays make deterrence in most European capitals, take these words literate, make it a deterrence. It is as simple as it is, at the moment the precision ammo starts falling, deterrence must be delivered. Because the WarTribunal will consider these bombings as some NATO attack against the Palestines. And after that the Palestines have the right to hit back, this is not rocket science.  

Title: A little greeting from Iraqi's Abu Ghraib to the Americans.
        

13 Oct 2004: Like written before and repeated on 01 Oct a few days ago:
  • No attacks against the Afghan elections while,
  • The impending Iraqi elections must be boycotted.

Any idiot can see how the Afghan elections from last Saturday unfolded (except for the Americans of course, that country is so full of corruption you just don't believe it...).

But Ramadan is impending and the Iraqi operatives that have to stage the actual attacks are in my mind. Lets never forget that the operatives in Iraq will swallow the bullets from the Americans, it will impact in their bodies while local authorities around here are just to cowardly to confront me.

Honor goes to those who stage the actual attacks. This is a relentless principle, my task and work is not honorfull or heroic. I only seize opportunities given to me by a bunch of local and American cowards...

Let the GOOD LUCK be with the Iraqi operatives, do please try to minimize innocent deaths and just good luck. Good luck, you will be in my mind all the time. 

But, there is a simple battlefield tip to avoid shit after you are arrested by that American slime.
It goes as this:

In relation with the attacks staged on 29 April this year, the first Giant Military Bloody Day, in the neighborhood of the biggest success of that day two men were arrested. (These men had traces of explosive materials on their hands.)

Later I emailed the Pentagon a few times and told them (in relation to the Abu Ghraib equation that also surfaced on that day in the American media files) that it could only be 'rank, name and serial number' in case these two men were interrogated. (According to the Geneva conventions a captured soldier does only need to give the 'rank, name and serial number...) I also instructed them to release these two arrested men in the shortest possible terms. 

Of course the American slime, those fundamental cowards, did not answer me.

Well, all those who get arrested by American slime simply must say after arrest and during interrogation;

Sorry, this is my name, this is my rank and my army number is this or that. 

And when the American slime keeps on beating you, or forces you to crawl through broken glass (like in the Abu Ghraib equation has happened before, you must say to that slime American 'interrogators' simple words like 'The Dutch guy is truly considering designer diseases. He is.'

Give it a try, the cowards surrounding me and the American cowards still will not attack me. Just give it a try, it could prevent more beating the shit out of you... Give it a try!

And with this, your name is your name of course, your rank is operative and your serial number is any number you like. 

Title: A little greeting from Iraqi's Abu Ghraib to the Americans.
        

14 Oct 2004: Of course the Charles A. Duelfer report has to be commented too. I didn't read it, only snippets in the Media files. And I will not read it entirely, this all has been observed before.
There is much similarity with the way the Dutch government reacted on that final Sebrenica report, this can be viewed upon as the great moral white wash. Likely there is a need in groups of people to indulge such a kind of moral white wash, because after all they are the good doers so it has to be external factors that did all the bad things.

Let me give you an example of how here in Holland the debate changed over the course of years, in the beginning after the Sebrenica onslaught it was asked the Dutch prime minister Mr. Wim Kok if he would resign because the Dutch clearly made some mistakes here. But no, Mr. Wim Kok was a firm standing man, that would only be a reward for Mr. Milocovic he stated.
Years later when the 'final' Sebrenica report was there (also some kind of moral white wash) the Dutch cabinet finally draw the right conclusion and did step down from power. 

Compare this to these days, there is definitely an overkill of at least 800 thousand Iraqi civilians from the economical sanctions. And the diverse leaders of the occupying (or liberating) countries are sometimes asked if some kind of excuse or sorry is needed.
The way lots of them react is to interpret this excuse as some kind of excuse to the local electorate. 
The Australian and the British prime ministers answer the questing of saying sorry within this window. It is not hard to see that both men, Mr. Howard and Mr. Blair simply cannot deal with these devastating numbers of dead people for completely nothing. Lets never forget they died for completely nothing whatever we all think of the former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein. It is not hard to see that pretending that the local electorate in Australia and Brittany need some 'excuse' is a rough insult to many hundreds of thousands Iraqi families, the excuse for being stupid has to be done against the Iraqis.

That is why I say the impending elections must be boycotted (although this can lead to civil war in case the Shia do not boycott and the Sunni do boycott). Well I hope there will be no civil war but on the same hand I hope there will be serious boycott of the elections by all groups in Iraq. That goes to for the Kurds, the Christians and all the rest. 

Now for the role of America in this all, a long time ago I informed my readers that as far as I see it, the blame and the guilt of the over one million dead Iraqis is 40% on Saddam and 60% on America (leaving parties like the United Nations and Security Council members out of view). This assessment, this estimation is still valid I think.
The main reason that America will always have the largest piece of blame is simply the completely mass hysteria upon the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction problem. This American mass hysteria was in all layers of Ameican society, in the free press, in the secret services, in the military, in the government on all levels.
Just an example: 1999 there are reports of some kind of 'mosquito poison' or so, just wait a short time and American media outlets start explaining that it is very likely that Saddam Hussein is studying the method of 'mosquito poison'. 
But, for more important, this American mass hysteria was also a main contribution factor to the games Saddam could play with the 'yes or no WMD' question. Because the Americans had so much hysteria it was possible he could even mislead the Iraqi army (the former Iraqi army officers are to blame to but they had also the problem of censorship and had not a clear view of reality and they had the problem of all that secret doing from Sammy...) 

The Americans must not think I write this because I am some anti American, they must not interchange cause and effect. Just look at the latest American mass hysteria: The Zarqawi figure must definitely be inside Fallujah.
And the same pattern as with the WMD mass hysteria comes floating above and the same pattern as all that evilizing of drugs in the war on drugs come floating above.

When I say and when I write that Americans have to be killed into the thousands and hundreds of thousands, this point is based on solid evidence. This has been a solid and scientific exercise in understanding the way countries and societies are and the way they can transform. For America words are not enough, there has to be follow up and in the long run it will be better for them too. Just look at the present mess in Fallujah, it will be better for them too.  

Now back to the Charles A. Duelfer reporting: When many people are already dead, say more then one million, most people simply cannot accept this was all for nothing. The human brain doesn't work that way, when there is such big sacrifice done there has to be some reason to this. May be sacrifice is the wrong word here, it was just a waste of human life on a massive scale. Wasted on the altars of political powers, wasted on the corruption inside the American political system where too much power is in the hands of too little (and incompetents).

__________________________ 

But, I think I can defend the next: When I would have the Iraqi army under my control for 5 to 7 years, I think the American death toll would be five to six times as high. 
And that is not some ego trip from a guy with a too big ego, maximizing military force with a minimum of sources is that was is known as asymmetric warfare. After all, general Patton (an American) himself said: 'Compared to war all other forms of human endeavor fade into insignificance.'   

18 Oct 2004: Lots of interesting news is observed but since it is surely one of my goals to make 'filet Americain' from the US military the next wonderful fake science cannot be skipped.
To set the mind properly read first the simple minded file around (more) efficient bunker building, here it is.

The 'fake science' observed is around 'long rod' mathematics, although the mathematical model used looks plausible and indeed feeds the American military fantasies in a mathematical closed way, it is also a bunch of shit. Simply because you can also think of stuff that makes the thin rod instable in the very first impact (and so will never penetrate the ground anyway). (Like written in the 'efficient bunker building' file I only mentioned simple and easy thinking only minimizing costs involved.).

Now, those who love and understand mathematics on a deep enough level can enjoy the next. Other (normal) readers can skip this without loss of coherence into this long story. Enjoy fake military science:

Title: Fake American hard rod military penetration mathematics...
    

American 'Filet Americain' has to be there on all levels possible & needed; on the actual battlefields, in the military science of that country, inside politics and so on. (The inside politics fails constantly...).

Yet the mathematical model of 'hard rod penetration' is very nice at first sight, but as a military person one has to look at that what is efficient given the 'boundary conditions' at hand. And 'boundary conditionlike' considerations say that glued wood (as mentioned in the efficient bunker building file) attacks the penetrating rod with glue (that is the 'R' in the math model above). 

Lets leave the most beautiful part of science (math) for what it is, and look at other fun found. There is lovely and laughable fun found and deep fearful 'fun' found (the fear lies in the connection between the WarOnDrugs and the WarOnTerror, report below). Lets start with the fun:

__________________________

FUN 01: The American WashingtonPost did ponder on a three page long article the question if the 11 March 2004 Madrid bombs were timed to disrupt the Spanish elections from three days later. Lots of so called 'terror experts' were quoted giving their opinion on this, some said 'yes' and some said 'no' upon the 'election disruption' equation. 
The Americans are weird for sure, now it is over six months after the Madrilène paella and most 'terror experts' do not understand the learning curve taken by the so called 'international terrorists'. 

This was funny, this shows how slow thinking goes over there. That is good and that is fun! :)

__________________________

FUN 02: In Iraq a lot was observed but I only quote the fun, here is the quote:

An Australian journalist held hostage in Iraq for 24 hours said last night his kidnappers freed him when they established he did not support the US army's presence in the country.

"I was well treated . . . I was not hurt and treated with respect once they established my credentials as an independent journalist," John Martinkus, a reporter for SBS's Dateline, said on his arrival in Jordan.

No need to say that so seldom it the sharp battlefield advice came floating above via the media files, the WashingtonPost people could learn a thing from this. Because only those who are related to the US military can be executed, simple or not my dear Washington Post? Simple or not?   

__________________________

FUN 03: Some parts of the Iraqi cell structure did feel the need to make it clear to the Western public (and some others) on what side they were. Quote found:

"With the advent of the month of Ramadan and the need for Muslims to unify ranks in the face of the enemy ... We announce that the Tawhid and Jihad Group, its prince and soldiers, have pledged allegiance to the sheikh of the mujahideen (holy fighters) Osama bin Laden," said the statement.

This is a good development and that's a fact! Lets hope that the 'exchangement of visions' will carry fruit in the right hierarchical order. (That means there is only one 'golden standard' in terror land and that is al Qaida, after my humble opinion the Iraqis must take a serious look at their vision on this all...)

After all, also at al Qaida 'headquarters' there is frowning upon (for example) 35 or 34 dead kids at some silly sewage plant near Baghdad (while using the method of car bomb). This is likely not viewed upon as 'Hurray, another 35 Martyrs extra soon in paradise'. No, this is not likely.

But, from the hierarchical point of view, this was a great fun development.  

__________________________

FEARFUL 01: Remember that Beslan school siege? That entire school hostage taking in Beslan, Ossetia, Russia (from begin September last month) that ended in that big blood bath?

Wasn't that an attack against a 'soft target' that more or less broke all the rules? A few hundred children dead, lots of media coverage and we all felt down upon the inspection of dead children bodies. To make it more clear, here a just a few of these kid bodies: 

Title: Do we remember this again? Beslan, Ossetia, Rusland.
        

Here are just a few of dead kid bodies, before the Beslan seige I wasn't that sharp into Chechen statistics. I only thought at most 10 thousand dead Chechen children, that is what I thought (naïve may be).
Reality is likely it is some number between 40 and 60 thousand and why doesn't my dear reader compare numbers? Just compare the numbers done by that drunk Russian army compared to the worst of what some operatives do. Just count dead bodies my dear reader, it is good for the soul.

Now think back to the 9/11 equation and I did my best to contact local authorities in some proper way, I was constantly turned back because I was some registered drug user.
I grew mad but in the end after some time I stopped drugs and again tried to talk to some folks, guess what happened? Well, it was just the fact that I stopped drugs because "That could be possible too."

Now, almost two years after stopping drugs I can enjoy 'authority words' like "Of course drugs has nothing to to with 9/11 because heroine is such a non hallucination kind of thing." 

You just do not believe the kind of crap reasoning I have came upon, this is a country full of weird and coward people. That is a fact, but weird and coward shake hands in the next: 

Title: This is how they are, showing mutual respect to one another.
        

This is how they are, the American president Dubya Bush doesn't understand the WarOnDrugs part into the WarOnTerror & the Rusian counterpart Mr. Vladimir Putin doesn't understand the democratic part in it. Let me not do difficult in this, lets once more look at one fine result of this: 

Title: Where has the American WarOnDrugs gone anyway? 
        

Now my dear reader you are filled to understand the fine quotes from the Media files, quoting:

All the hostage-takers who seized Beslan's school number one on September 1 were drug addicts and were under the influence of narcotics throughout the 52-hour siege, Russia's Deputy Prosecutor General has claimed. 

In a statement to the Interfax news agency, Nikolay Shepel said that forensic tests on the extremists' corpses had shown that 22 of the 32 hostage-takers were on hard drugs and had regularly injected substances such as heroin and morphine while the other 10 had been using softer drugs. 

His statement will satisfy many of the bereaved, who have long since claimed that the extremists were "narkomany" or junkies. 

Traces of narcotics left in the militants' lifeless bodies exceeded normally lethal levels, Shepel added, indicating that they were long-term addicts and had been high while preparing the terror act which ultimately claimed the lives of 344 people, over half of whom were children.

Their extreme brutality could also have been spurred on by the fact that some of them had run out of drugs. 

Shepel said: "Some of the criminals had run out of drugs and were suffering from withdrawal symptoms which are usually accompanied by aggressiveness and uncontrollable behavior." 

"These conclusions allow us to look at the situation from a new angle." 

His claims were backed up by Alexander Torshin, the chairman of the parliamentary inquiry into the tragedy, who said that many of the witnesses he and his colleagues had interviewed had said the same. 

"The commission is determined to find out what was in these drugs because judging by eyewitness testimony - and we need to check this - the terrorists had practically no pain threshold," he told Ekho Moskvy radio station yesterday. 

"They were able to take three bullets and continue to fight and showed no signs of fatigue."

Comment: To me there is no drugs known that keeps soldiers able to take three bullets without any sign of fatigue, if there was I would love to have the name of that drugs.
Also there is a long history of drugs and battlefield behavior, for example American pilots have those amphetamines with them (only used 'controllably' of course). All in all the cheap use of WarOnDrugs propaganda in this WarOnTerror is not smart, I have smoked the Afghan smoke for 12 years and now I have stopped for almost two years.
What is the crap you are talking? Never I went 'aggressively' because of lacking drugs, never I just stole one cent, never I was short on paid taxes (always paid more than needed). This all is crap, the WarOnDrugs is crap and the WarOnTerror too.

I am not doing difficult, all countries get the attacks they deserve. Let me keep it as simple as it is.  

Title: All countries get the attacks they deserve, that is a simple insight.
        

Before we split the day, the reader is invited to ponder what is more scary; Me smoking the Afghan smoke while never paying to little taxes or (given that the 'drug hypothesis' from the Beslan, Ossetia, Russia scene is for real) the next words of Russian president Mr. V. Putin:

"I consider the activities of terrorists in Iraq are not as much aimed at coalition forces but more personally against President Bush," Putin said at a news conference after a regional summit in the Tajik capital, Dushanbe.

Now let we close the end to this days writings with the wonderful wisdom of the Russian Commander in Chief (Iraqis attack to prevent reelection of the American president). Lets summon the day:

  • Fake 'hard rod' mathematics from the US military,

  • Fun = WashingtonPost pondering if the Marid paella was election disruptive or not,

  • Fun = Western journalist released along standard battlefield advices given long time ago,

  • Fun = The evil Tawhid & HolyWar group declares listening to elementary battlefield advices,

  • Fear = The Russian attempt to bind the Beslan killing to the WarOnTerror via WarOnDrugs. 

So that is how small parts of this planet were received by me today. Till updates & have a nice life. 

19 Oct 2004: Today it was reported again that some Beslan (Ossetia, Rusland) hostage takers took three bullets and still kept on fighting. To be honest, I am very skeptical upon this. Also the 'heroin hypothesis' does not make much sense in relation with the Beslan hostage taking. 

The heroine thing gives only a boost at direct muscular performance (over 11% more muscle power but in a long bike ride of 80 to 100 kilometers there is no significant difference observed anyway) and a less emotional brain.

So I think it is very plausible that some drugs were involved into the school siege & hostage taking, but from the same kind of the coin we can argue that some hostage takers were so aggressive because they did not use drugs.
The sole fact that Russian authorities can use 'drugs' as some explanation for the behavior of the attack is based upon the general American view on drugs. Based on fried emotional air.

Lets take into account, from a military point of view, that the American bureau named DARPA (from the American department of defense) did start some investigation into the creation of super soldiers who could stay awake (& ready to fight) for over a week long. This was (partially) triggered by the fast 21 days entry of Iraq...

More into account, the history between war and drugs is an old one. So called 'evil drugs' to sharpen the finger of 'terrorist snipers' is likely the same that is used in the sport of billiard balls (don't know the name of that stuff). 

With this in the back of your mind you can enjoy the 'evil quotes' below in the Media report to this day:

The terrorists who took over 1,000 people hostage at a school in southern Russia last month used more than just heroin, the head of a parliamentary committee investigating the Beslan siege told journalists.

As MosNews reported on Monday, the results of forensic tests, released by local prosecutor Nikolai Shepel, showed what would normally have been deadly doses of heroin and morphine in most of the 32 terrorists. 

But Senator Alexander Torshin, who heads the Beslan investigation committee, told Ekho Moskvy radio Tuesday that heroin was not enough to produce that kind of behavior in the hostage-takers, and that they must have used new kinds of drugs.

In particular, Torshin cited the militants’ ability to continue fighting despite being badly wounded and presumably in great pain.

Comment: Well I do not have a clue either and the possibility of 'mass hysteria' must not be underestimated. Also in practice, these laboratory tests that confirm the amount of 'heroin' and so have large standard deviation. (Or only differentiate between some kind of drugs yes-or-no in the body.)
Duality is in my mind, on the one hand I like the Islamic operatives so much because they can stage attacks without drugs. On the other hand if the 'three bullets taken' stuff is for real we see a mighty weapon.

A mighty weapon we see, but where are the morals in the use of it? 

(Later it was reported that the behavior of the Beslan hostage takers could also be contributed to the drugs angel dust, PCP orphencyclidine. Well this all could very well be. But why are there no Media reports observed explaining the behavior of American soldiers at the Iraqi Abu Ghraib prison via drugs?
Lets not forget, when you look at the average American soldier, they are just to muscular compared to the hours a day they could train their muscles. Lets not forget that too my dear reader.) 

Till updates.

20 Oct 2004: Within two weeks there will be presidential elections in America. Since the present president is clearly still going by the nickname of IQ43 (he is the 43th president of America) we must show more proof for that. So what more clues are found that indicate that IQ43 is the only fitting nickname for this president?

Well I have found two more clues, the first is delivered by that American television evangelist Pat Robertson and the second by the Russian president Vladimir Putin. (Bush admires Putin by the way, lately he stated that.) Here we go:

Clue 01: American media outlet CNN wrote:
The founder of the U.S. Christian Coalition said Tuesday he told President George W. Bush before the invasion of Iraq that he should prepare Americans for the likelihood of casualties, but the president told him, "We're not going to have any casualties."

Pat Robertson, an ardent Bush supporter, said he had that conversation with the president in Nashville, Tennessee, before the March 2003 invasion U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. He described Bush in the meeting as "the most self-assured man I've ever met in my life."

"And I warned him about this war. I had deep misgivings about this war, deep misgivings. And I was trying to say, 'Mr. President, you had better prepare the American people for casualties.' "

Robertson said the president then told him, "Oh, no, we're not going to have any casualties."

This is very good, this is a solid clue for the mindsets that rule the White House these days. I just hope this guy gets elected again and there is good possibility that reelection will happen. Given both candidates, this George Dubya Bush is the one that can bring the most damage to America and therefore has my blessing...

Next clue, George W. Bush admires his counterpart Vladimir Putin (that is what he stated himself, this is not propaganda, this is actually said). Take a look at the picture of these two men again: 

Title: Mutual respect, admiration and understanding brings peace. Really true.
        

Clue 02: American media outlet Yahoo wrote:
"I consider the activities of terrorists in Iraq are not as much aimed at coalition forces but more personally against President Bush," Putin said at a news conference after a regional summit in the Tajik capital, Dushanbe. 

"International terrorism has as its goal to prevent the election of President Bush to a second term," he said. "If they achieve that goal, then that will give international terrorism a new impulse and extra power."

The words from Puting give a breath taking inside look into the ways he thinks (in case they are true and sincere). He thinks international terrorism revolves around his pal Mr. Bush, why he does think that people are willing to give their lives on Iraqi soil to change the outcome of elections in America? Why does he say this and why does no journalist ask nasty questions later? Has Putin turned into a czar?
Ha, on the watch of this Mr. V. Putin thousands of Chechen kids were killed, where was Putin at that point? Did he think the drunk Russian army killed them to make sure he will get reelected again?
But in looking in a negative way at Mr. Putin does not give the right answers, he is religious too and he is good pals with Mr. Bush and both men think it is GOOD fighting EVIL. That is what they do, they are the good doers fighting evil and they will continue fighting evil until the end of times.

So all in all, given my long term policy of crushing the US army, it is better if Bush is reelected again. Bush is simply better in pumping up the hate against America because he lacks what it takes to be an international leader. 

So far those boring politics, like said before the American president is only important to me because they have the American military under their political asses. There is no denying this.

Now (finally) for some US dollar fun again (the pic below shows a six months time frame, last Friday was four trading sessions back). Pictured is the €/US$ currency pair:  

Title: Were there some hedge funds driving by last Friday? 
        

On 09 Oct I wrote down my actual estimation upon the US$ value and after that I was only waiting. Last Friday 15 Oct there was good action observed, a tactic named 'drive by' was reported on dailyfx dot com. My compliments to the hedge fund cell structure, you are operatives too you know... ;) It was a wonderful blast, my compliments.
Oh, now I have my hedge fund cell structure on the line anyway, that bonanza of oil raids from lately are very nice too. It was your own idea, I have nothing to do with it, but we must not make it too crazy.
There are lots of not oil producing poor countries too so stop pumping up the prices after, lets say, 60 to 63 US$ / barrel. Deal?

In the  meantime the hedge funds must adjust to the reality of the declared economical sanctions (against America). That path just has to be taken, with a more realistic America the world is served better. Also when I say that the hedge fund cell structure are 'operatives' too I only mean you have to take into account your own policies and strike in concert when needed.
The average policy of the average hedge fund is concentrating on absolute returns and not on 'automatic' long term returns. At the end of the 'day' (the time period) involved there has to be a profit, these sharks can serve this story very well.

And to avoid to much disruption and long term damage these sharks must strike in concert there where it is needed, right now indeed currencies and a bit of oil. In a few years pharmaceutical industries and defense industry, but these are future preys for the sharks...  

End to the writings to this day, think with light my dear reader.

21 Oct 2004: Ha, yesterday I quoted those wonderful words of the American prez concerning the number of expected dead US soldiers into this Gulf War number two. Some weird guy named Pat Robertson told that before the start of the war the American prez told him: "Oh, no, we're not going to have any casualties.
Well, this day some female named Karen Huges (she works for the reelection campaign) declared that the Holy President never spoke words like that. She never gave a sniplet of proof for that (likely no one else was there during the conversation between the Holy President Dubya and Pat Robertson, the founder of the US Christian Coalition).

Of course we must take into account that people like Pat Robertson are even bigger slime compared to George Dubya (far bigger slime) but his reports looks very credible and he stays with his vision of what happened during their conversation.      

All in all I think that indeed words like "Oh, no, we're not going to have any casualties" (or similar words) have been spoken during that conversation. May be you remember that camera feed that was on 'by accident' the minutes before George Dubya Bush officially declared the war against Iraq? Didn't his eyes go jokingly from the one person to the other just minutes before the declaration of death and destruction was there?
Only a guy who thought there would be no American fatalities would behave like that.

Only a guy who does not understand that you cannot declare war (on terror and so) and at the same time lower taxes can behave like that. Never in the entire history a war could be fought while at the same time lowering taxes, this guy is a joker from the end to the beginning. Therefore I hope on reelection, I just hope...

__________________________

In another development the people from Afghanistan and Iraq must ask themselves the question of all that international help promised will ever arrive. Even when all violent acts are stopped this very day, it is very likely that almost no international serious help will be there.

Don't believe me? Well read these nice quotes found on ABC news (a country that cannot take care of it's own wounded and invalid soldiers cannot give serious help to Afghanistan and Iraq, that is a simple and straightforward extrapolation to the future). Lovely quotes found:

But Johnson now lives in his car. It is where he spends most of his days, all of his nights, in constant pain from his injuries and unwilling to burden his family.
Stories like Tyson Johnson's are not unique. 

Many of the severely wounded soldiers returning from Iraq face the prospect of poverty and what they describe as official indifference and incompetence.

"Guys I've met, talking to people, they'd be better off financially for their families if they had died as opposed to coming back maimed," said Staff Sgt. Ryan Kelly, who served as a civil affairs specialist for the Army while in Iraq.

Comment: Of course I love this, these kind of stories are just a simple consequence of the way most Americans view social care. The standard answer is always 'That makes people only dependent on the government.' That is the standard answer and I love it to see wounded people getting no help whatsoever. 
More nice quoting:

Perhaps as a sign of the grim outlook facing many of these wounded soldiers, Staff Sgt. Peter Damon, a National Guardsman from Brockton, Mass., said he is grateful for being a double amputee.

"Well, in a way, I'm kind of lucky losing both arms because I've been told I'll probably get 100 percent disability," he said.

Damon, a mechanic and electrician, lost both arms in an explosion as he was repairing a helicopter in Iraq. He initially woke up in the hospital worried and anxious to learn that both forms of livelihood were taken away from him.

"Now what am I doing to do?" Damon said, faced with the prospect of supporting his wife, Jennifer, and two children. "I can't do either, none of those, with no hands."

The military fails to provide a lump sum payment for such catastrophic injuries. And Damon still has not heard from the military about what they plan to give in terms of monthly disability payments.

The last time Damon asked about the payments, he was told by the military that his paperwork had been lost.

"And then when I went to go back to inquire about it again, just to ask a question, I just wanted to see if they had found my paperwork, I was told I had to make an appointment and to come back five days later," he said.

A thick book of federal regulations specifies the disability rate based on how many limbs were amputated and precisely where.

The percentage rates were set during World War II.

Comment: This is a wonderful, this is what American soldiers deserve. This is a logical consequence of the inner American policies (not making people 'dependent' on the government). I just like it.
And from a scientifically point of view, it is one detail more that proofs far to much corruption is in that society, it is of devastating broadness. There are almost no children from the American Senate and House serving 'voluntary' in the American 'voluntary army'. 
But when you show a flag to those trailer people they follow you into war without thinking. 

Only a country that treats it's own citizens this way could so easily prevent those hundreds of Fallujah civilians to go to the main hospital during the April siege. That simply is normal behavior to them, it is not a war crime, it is normal because they treat their own people the same way. Right now there are 1.7 million US military veterans without medical assurance (there are many many millions more of course), the 1.7 million (who often have jobs) consider this very normal. And when the prez throws them a bone they say thank you sir.
And when the American flag is on the telly they get tears in their eyes and say "What a lovely country we are."

These decades America is for sure the most bad advertisement for freedom and democracy, but yet they spread it around via military means and even think 'it works'. And all similarities with the German population from before World War II are only coincidental most Americans think. And just like the Germans from the 1930-1940 period who saw what was happening, what could they do? Nothing.
And all Americans who get mad upon the policies of these years, what can they do? Nothing.
When you are even an elderly female and you write a nasty letter upon the 'holy president' towards a local newspaper, you get a visit from the FBI in your home. (Here in Holland there is similar stuff, when on some party you start pissing off the Dutch queen most people don't want to talk about that and turn away, yet in America it is much stronger.) These FBI people are very friendly of course and only want 'to look around' in case you want to endanger the president. But even these FBI people cannot change that madness, America is only served with more shock therapy.

Shock therapy that dwarfs the 9/11 dance from over three years back, on all levels of society they need it. They need it, they even crave for it, they want it so what is holding anybody down? Lets attack that slime that is a disgrace towards the way decent countries behave, words are not enough. 

Title: Words are not enough, shock therapy is still advised.
      

Now for the joke of the day; the former American president Mr. Bill Clinton wants to be the next chairman of the United Nations (and would love to chair the meetings of the Security Council...). This is a good joke, the guy that for eight consecutive years did not understood the American mass hysteria against Iraq is now willing to lead the United Nations! The joker, it would be better if those United Nations would with drawl from American soil. The American spending on stuff like WarOnDrugs has done enough damage beside all the rest.

Well, here is a quote of bizarre American fantasies upon the replacement of Mr. Koffi Annan:

WASHINGTON, Oct. 20 (UPI) -- Former U.S. President Bill Clinton has set his sights on becoming U.N. secretary-general. A Clinton insider and a senior U.N. source have told United Press International the 56-year-old former president would like to be named leader of the world body when Kofi Annan's term ends early in 2006.

"He definitely wants to do it," the Clinton insider said this week.

A Clinton candidacy is likely to receive overwhelming support from U.N. member states, particularly the Third World. Diplomats in Washington say Clinton would galvanize the United Nations and give an enormous boost to its prestige. But the former president's hopes hang on a crucial question that will not be addressed until after the presidential elections: can he get the support of the U.S. government -- a prerequisite for nomination?

Comment: I just wonder what those 'Third World Diplomats' are smoking every day, they have seen Mr. Clinton for eight years in office as the American president and what good did it bring to their countries? (Not that I am very satisfied upon my own Europe but that's another thing.)
But it is a wonderful joke, it would definitely make the United Nations the 'debating club' for ever. It is almost just as wonderful as we see the Afghan interim president surrounded by his American private militia saying words like "All private militia's must be dealt with."

Sometimes I just wonder what these people smoke, I just wonder what the definition of 'smoke' is...

So no Bill Clinton and no other American either (the WarTribunal throws in it's veto right) but who else? Well elementary considerations of decent international politics say that a decent WarTribunal can never give any kind of advice on this, simply because the WarTribunal is some military wing of the United Nations (or the follow up of 'United' Nations).

So I throw in the veto right and withhold any comment further. Simple and efficient. (A mainly American financed UN cannot have an American chairman either, that's a joke!)

__________________________

And now, as the closing of this day, we take finally a look at the Iran nuke-yes-or-no question. The international community is doing a bit difficult upon this and there are indeed reasons to suspect Iran of being less then straightforward. But since this is a difficult equation let me make a formal WarTribunal statement from this:

Two years ago Iran's Rafsanjani pondered the question of nuking Israel yes or no. The pro's and the contra's, the benefits and withdrawals had to be discussed he thought.

This was reported via Western media outlets so there could be some bias in this.

Furthermore I wish the Iranians all the luck in the world with the peaceful use of nuclear energy; the electricity for citizens, the medical use that can save lots of lives, the radiation of food so no chemical stuff is needed. And so on. I wish them all the luck in the world.

Also I do not blame Mr. Rafsanjani for pondering the nuke poundering question, there are lots of Israeli generals who likely have done dual thinking in this. I am not doing difficult in this, I only try to look with a military eye at the situation.

From the WarTribunal point of view, Iran has to be allowed to go on with their nuclear programs while at the same time some 'non nuke attack' agreement with Israel has to be signed. This is no rocket science; when Israel declares it is willing to scrap Iran from the target list, it is reasonable that Iran can proceed with peaceful nuclear research. This is no rocket science.  

(And, ok ok, may be that 'light water reactor help' offered by the European Union isn't that bad an idea. Yet the main problem is and stays; Why should Israel be allowed to point with nukes towards Iran while Iran can do nothing back? It are the Israeli nukes that are the bottom line of this problem, not the Iranian attitude!)

End to this day, along came the next topics:

  • The "Oh, no, we're not going to have any casualties" quote from the present American president,
  • Lack of rebuilding in Iraq/Afghanistan explained via lack of help to invalid American veterans,
  • The joke of the day; former US prez Bill Clinton wants to chair the United Nations,
  • WarTribunal statement concerning the Iranian nuclear developments. 

Till updates, have a nice life or try to get one.

Title: Success of Israeli policies explained via Sinai Taba Hilton 'rebuilding'.
        

23 Oct 2004: Given the American attitude from lately against the peace loving people inside the city of Fallujah, Iraq, I asked bluntly the US military the next (yesterday):

(Friday 22 Oct 2004) Iraq's Fallujah clergy has spoken a few times and their words were not to be misunderstood: Declaration of a full blown jihad and boycott of the elections are mentioned.
So the US army has to understand the raising of the likelihood of civil war after a Sunni boycott of elections, right now it is the task of the US army & marines to cough up some serious proof that there is indeed 'al Qaida' presence inside Fallujah. And don't come up with some dead bodies having some Syrian passport or so, that wouldn't hold up in any courtroom.
What have you got Americans, what have you got for 'proof'? The credibility of the intel gathering of the US military is on the line so show what you have got instead of that stupid political talk (from Pentagon officials) like '
only after the US elections there will be blown out attack against Fallujah'.

In the meantime it should be wise if the English diplomats stop telling crap like 'evil is concentrated in Fallujah', what is the 45 minutes proof from the British in this? Now?  

Well, one day later there still isn't that much. Today I only found the next quote:

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) The U.S. military has arrested a ''senior leader'' in the network run by Jordanian terror mastermind Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, along with five others during overnight raids in the insurgent stronghold of Fallujah, officials said Saturday.

Intelligence sources said the man captured was previously thought to be a relatively minor member of the terror network. But because so many of al-Zarqawi's associates have been captured or killed, he moved up to take a more important role.

This isn't very much, to be honest this is crap. But lets skip the emotional part in this and simply explain that the daily bombing (done at night of course) is not from yesterday. It is long standing outside reality of this American military, quote from over three years back (daily bombings in Iraq are long long going on):

Monday February 19, 2001
However, unlike the military campaign to expel Iraqi forces from Kuwait, the no-fly zones were not authorised by the UN and they are not specifically sanctioned by any Security Council resolution.

BBC diplomatic correspondent Barnaby Mason says the Western powers - led by President George Bush senior - argued that their action was consistent with Security Council Resolution 688 adopted on 5 April 1991.
But critics of the no-fly zones point out that the resolution did not say the Security Council was acting under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, which provides for enforcement action.

Nor did it say that all necessary means could be used.

Critics add that whatever was justified in 1991 is not necessarily justified more than 10 years later, when the reasons for continuing the air patrols may have changed.

Comment: Nice date eh? 19 Feb 2001 and stuff was unfolding... Lets get real, I do not know the total tonnage of bombs dropped during the timeframe between both Gulf Wars. We only see that the United Nations is a stupid debating club all those years (they must be liberated from the US funding, that might help). And we see that the American military keeps on behaving along old formed patterns.

Right now we know that all these years there were no weapons of mass destruction so the Iraqis might have some reason to be pissed against US & UK forces. 

It is as simple as it is; the American behavior and fantasies around Fallujah are strikingly similar to all those years in between these Gulf Wars. And we can wonder very much if the Iraqis are truly waiting upon some American model of democracy in their country, we can wonder.
We can wonder if the Sunnis believe if the Americans are sincere this time or still live in a fantasy world. 

Title: The old no fly zones in Iraq, yet the old fantasies still rule.
        

In another development I finally understand why Russian dumbhead (president) Mr. Vladimir Putin talks shit like 'The Iraqi resistance wants to prevent reelection of my friend Mr. George W. Bush and therefore scale up attacks before the American elections.' I finally understand the 'reasoning' in this, quote from some American dumbhead:

Iraqi and U.S. officials fear there may be an effort to duplicate the 1968 Tet Offensive in Vietnam, in which North Vietnamese forces invaded regional capitals and managed to penetrate the U.S. Embassy in Saigon.

The North Vietnamese were pushed back and took huge casualties. But the fact that enemy forces could reach the U.S. Embassy was a public relations disaster for the presidency of Lyndon B. Johnson.

Despite tight security around the Green Zone, two suicide bombings within the perimeter last week killed 10 people. Many Iraqis live and work inside the zone, and it clearly can be penetrated.

Comment: This insight comes as a big surprise to me, right now after only 18 months after invasion it would be strange that the resistance would be that strong already. A reload of the Vietnam Tet offensive? And although large parts of the Iraqi resistance are organized via some 'perfect cell structure' I wonder if it is big enough to strike devastatingly at the Green zone. I just wonder, miracles can happen of course, miracles can happen. 

That is all I have to say, I would like election timing too but Iraqi operatives must not forget that the Bush thing is not that relevant all in all. This American Bush thing is only important because he controls the largest military on earth, my view is simple; I prefer the dumb enemy.

No, military wisdom is found in hefty attacks on the new born so called 'Iraqi army' and a bit less attacks against new Iraqi police. (Police attacks stay important of course because they do the arresting and so).
So a little decline in attacks against police, a bit more against 'new Iraqi army stuff' and most of all; kill Americans. 

To end the day with a light tone lets quote a bit from that Baghdad blogger that suddenly gained fame during the start of this GulfWarII in Iraq, he goes under the name of Salem Pax and his quotes show once more how very coward the average American soldier is (Salem Pax was visiting Washinton and met with this former soldier there, quote):

You have no idea how strange it feels that we share so much in common. When I told him I would never actually approach an American soldier on the street in Baghdad, he told me that if we were in Baghdad he would probably be talking to me with his gun pointing at me because he would be scared shitless. Yet there we sat, drinking beers together.

He tells me how scared he was when he had to drive through Baghdad. On one of those drives, from one base to another, he had his gun pointing out of the window of his Humvee when he noticed that he was pointing it at a little girl who sitting in the car beside them. She looked him straight in the eye. He tells me about how frightening it was to be in a badly armoured Humvee and have to be the decoy that attracts fire away from the bigger fish in armoured civilian vehicles.

Comment: The whole concept of a soldier being scared to the bone only driving some Humvee around makes clear this army, this military, can be beaten. The sole problem is and stays their techno gadgets, the air power and stuff like that. But on the soldier-to-soldier level (as stated often before) the operatives are just much better.

Just much better, but their problem is they don't have enough fancy techno gadgets.  

Till updates, have a nice life or try to get one.

Title: Success of Israeli policies explained via Sinai Taba Hilton 'rebuilding'.
         

24 Oct 2004: Nice news, today it was observed that at least 49 members of the new born Iraqi 'army' (that US-led Iraqi 'army') were killed. Three minivans full of them, the vans were stopped at some spot & all had to got out and were executed...

Reports indicate that this even happened before I wrote the next words yesterday, therefore American and American-led Iraqi officials will understand that from the judicial point of view this is all a coincidence. (Quote from yesterday):

No, military wisdom is found in hefty attacks on the new born so called 'Iraqi army' and a bit less attacks against new Iraqi police. (Police attacks stay important of course because they do the arresting and so).
So a little decline in attacks against police, a bit more against 'new Iraqi army stuff' and most of all; kill Americans. 

Well we must not do difficult on this, when for example the American military would know that in some house 49 unarmed operatives were gathered they would instantly and without thinking throw a bit of air power in. (Of course air power because the average American soldier is to coward to fight on a more equal basis, stinking cowards is what they are.) 

Yet this isn't all, these stinking cowards have more wisdom to share (quote found on the CableNewsNetwork): 

The official said other findings included:
  • The absence of any unifying elements between 50 widely dispersed cells around the country.
  • Evidence that criminals, as opposed to terrorists with an overt political motivation, have conducted about 80 percent of the recent attacks.
  • Evidence that elements of the Baath Party are active "and even coming together in their efforts to regain control, disrupt organized government and to fund insurgent activities."
  • An indication that capturing or killing Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi would stop or slow insurgent activity significantly.

Comment: 

  • Of course the cell structure is of extreme importance for the long time surviving of resistance, all that cells need to know is a date (or even a preferred time) to strike. And when cell members of different cells meet face to face, they will never tell their real names and living places to one another. That is lethal to the cell structure as all easy understand.
  • The perception that 80 percent of all attacks against Americans is done by 'criminals' instead of 'terrorists' is an interesting shift in American led propaganda.
  • Of course at times people should meet and discuss things, luckily all people at those meetings are 'Ali Baba' and come from Tokyo or so...;) [Again all operatives must know that when captured by that American slime they only have to tell their name, rank and serial number according to the Geneva conventions of warfare. Your name is your name, your rank is operative and your number is any number you like!]
  • Will the capturing of Abu al-Zarqawi bring significant change in insurgent activity? Come on American military, the insurgency is so hefty because of your own behavior. This is not a puppet thing, this is broad and hefty reaction on what you did yourself all these years...

Also the American military has to take into account that when American Christians try to build new missionaries in Iraq these Christians often succeed. (Reports say at least eight new Christian missionaries). But when American Muslims try it just once they got suddenly arrested on, for example, tax fraud charges. After that the 'tax fraud' is celebrated as a big victory in the WarOnTerror via your Media files.

And what does the American military know of my accidental provocation of the Islam (from 21 May 2001) anyway? You prefer your own fantasy world more eh? Well you will feel the full wrath of at least 50 cells in Iraq for decades. (Or I will eat my shoes...)  

__________________________

Now we tunnel into a thing that I have been saying since the end of 2001, this is not a war on terror but this is a war with (the help of) terror. That means that the Americans use terror too when this is handy to feed their emotions. Don't believe me? Here is an official statement from one of those cowards from the coward US military, this statement is in relation with the Fallujah population in Iraq:

If there are civilians dying in connection with these attacks, and with the destruction, the local as some point have to make a decision…Do they want to harbor the insurgents and suffer the consequences that come with that, or do they want to get rid of the insurgents and have the benefit of not having them there?

Comment: I am not doing difficult on this, for over three years the Americans are willfully not investigating some well developed 'trigger hypothesis' to the 9/11 dance. I am not doing difficult in this, these Americans are cowards to the bone. 
But lucky me, the (American) writer of the quote above is capable of mirroring them via:

If there are civilians dying in connection with these attacks, and with the destruction, the locals at some point have to make a decision.  Do they want to harbor the Americans and suffer the consequences that come with that, or do they want to get rid of the Americans and have the benefits of not having them there?

__________________________

Next country: Afghanistan. Now lots of votes are counted it looks like the Karzai thingeling is heading towards a victory. (There are also some reports saying Karzai only has 51% of popular vote, but lets skip this for the time being). Larger things loom around; there were lots of Afghan presidential candidates but guess who did get all media coverage? Here some corrupt details: 

The international monitoring body which provided the figures, but which did not want to be named, has measured the amount of time and space given to all candidates by the Afghan media since the one-month campaign began.

For the first three weeks it found that on state-controlled radio - a key medium here - President Karzai received 85% of all the editorial coverage of candidates.

On state-run television it was almost 75%.

When political advertising slots, which all candidates are guaranteed, are included, things even out a little - although the Afghan leader still receives almost three times as much air time as anyone else.

Comment: In a decent democracy all candidates of importance need to get the same amount of 'media coverage'. But just like the Americans were not capable of coming up with simple ideas like some legal opium plants towards Afghanistan, they were not capable of making some non-corruption free elections.
Of course the 'sitting president' has more media coverage because the figure involved has to fulfill international obligations; Of course this is a fact of life. The American model of democracy is corrupt to the bone, the Afghanis must not forget that. I have some better stuff at hand, but who am I?

__________________________

Lets close these days writings with what we started it; the amazing number of killed new Iraqi 'army' members. The Americans really think they can craft a new 'army' in Iraq and not feel the wrath of reality. Here a bit of reality is:

Al Qaeda Organisation for Holy War in Iraq, the new name of Zarqawi's group, said in a statement posted on a Web site often used by militants that it killed 48 "apostates" in the attack.

"The sons of Al Qaeda Organisation for Holy War in Iraq succeeded in killing 48 members of what is known as Iraq's idolatrous guards after they left a base in Kirkush ... on their way to the south of the country on a vacation," said the statement whose authenticity could not be verified.

"The mujahideen killed them all, stole two vehicles and the salaries they had just received from their masters," it said.

Iraqi police said guerrillas disguised as police had set up a checkpoint on a road northeast of Baghdad and stopped three minibuses carrying the recruits, forcing them to leave the vehicles and lie face down on the tarmac before shooting them.

Iraqi authorities said 49 recruits died in the attack.

Comment: Only little comment, the shift is very good. Battlefield advices of those who have been on the actual battlefields is always good (I as a person have never seen any real blood [except as a kid or so], don't forget my experiences on this). 

All in all this was a nice attack against the wrong kind of military axioms, new military axioms leading warfare even further out of civil areas take more time I just guess. 

Title: 49 dead, not via Geneva conventions but the dear Pentagon does the same.
        

25 Oct 2004: It was a lovely day today, the burning down of American dollar value continued in the good pace while other reports indicate that 350 (or 360) tons of high explosives are missing in Iraq. Yes, 350 thousand kilo of high explosives...

But we start with a message to the entire Afghan clergy, here it is:

When countries make the transition from 'mainly illiterate' to 'mostly literate' is it often observed it takes more than one generation. This is not needed in case the parents of the children know and understand just two things:

1) Children must go to school whenever that is possible,
2) School pupils must do their homework.

It is point number two that often takes that extra generation, that could be skipped if the Afghan clergy and tribal leaders think a bit on that. And, ok ok, I know that there is lack of school buildings, books, pencils and all the rest. And I know that lots of kids even do not make it to five years of age only because lack of good water, this all is known.
But when you can you must guide the Afghan parents who cannot read and write themselves and have children that need to learn that. Beside the discipline problems (going to school and making homework) there are lots of emotional problems in this, let me give just one simple example I had myself:

In my family I was the first to make it to some academically education at the local university (mathematics of course), some months later I visited my grandmother. To my amazement my grandmother started burning down my aspirations with words like "In our family we do not do this, this is arrogant." (She used the religious word for 'arrogant'). She even raised the possibility that this would not help me entering paradise, I was in total shock. What to say to my grandmother?

Well about 10 minutes later I left her, end of visit, and I had feelings for her that I normally project on the Americans. Later I forgave her, without her I wouldn't be here anyway so I just forgave her.

All in all, the problems in Afghanistan are clear, but when the clergy can skip an entire generation of transition into a 'mainly literate' landscape you would help this story very much. (Also we must take into account that there likely won't be that many international help, better not look at the Western countries for some help.) Good luck in this! 

__________________________ 

In another development I try to study how the international community reacts on that remarkable shift in names in the Iraq landscape. It is not long the "Unity & Jihad" from Iraq but renaming to "Al Qaida in Iraq", the renaming was done just two days ago (when it surfaced in Western Media files anyway) and only little standard American opportunity seizing like "I told you so!" is observed. Strange, why are the Americans not massively drumming the beat of "I told you so!"? 

Given the average American mindset this is weird behavior, why not harvest evil when they can? 

As an individual I can say I understand the emotion behind this renaming to al Qaida in Iraq rather well, to be honest I am very glad with this development. Just very glad, but the emotions behind this are easy to understand (except for American 'terror experts' of course). So it is a good and daring development, it is the good direction in the building of that vast and large country named the NationsOfMuslimMania.  

__________________________ 

Now for a small timeline upon the 350 thousand missing kilo's of high explosives, quote:

January 2003: IAEA inspectors viewed the explosives at Al-Qaqaa for the last time. The inspectors took an inventory and again placed storage bunkers at Al-Qaqaa under agency seal. 

February 2003: IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei told the United Nations that Iraq had declared that ''HMX previously under IAEA seal had been transferred for use in the production of industrial explosives.'' This apparently did not include the HMX that remained under seal at Al-Qaqaa. 

March 2003: Nuclear agency inspectors visited Al-Qaqaa for the last time but did not examine the explosives because the seals were not broken. The inspectors then pulled out of the country. 

March 2003: The U.S.-led coalition invaded Iraq. 

After the invasion: The Pentagon said Monday that ''coalition forces were present in the vicinity at various times during and after major combat operations. The forces searched 32 bunkers and 87 other buildings at the facility, but found no indicators of WMD (weapons of mass destruction). While some explosive material was discovered, none of it carried IAEA seals. 

Oct. 10, 2004: Iraq's Ministry of Science and Technology told the nuclear agency that 377 tons of explosives had disappeared from the Al-Qaqaa facility. The Iraqis said the materials were stolen and looted because of a lack of security.

Comment: Let me be simple, when I talk and write of carbombs with 500 kilo of this (or more), preferably outside civil areas please. The Iraqi's  want to imitate the American so called daisy cutter with a truck? Again be my guest but make sure it is just outside civil areas. Time is on the side of the Iraqi operatives and there are many hundreds of American military bases around the world, after all a dead American soldier is a dead American soldier.  

At the end of this wonderful day the pace of US dollar decline has to be posted, one simple graph on a six months time scale make all words not needed to speak. Enjoy: 

Title: International money explains her trust in this American government, they do.
        

26 Oct 2004: Another day comes by and each days gives always hundreds of opportunities to explain why Americans are in fact rubbish. Today we start with zooming in on one of those WarOnDrugs details, it is just a detail but it makes clear that these are dangerous people that must be killed into the thousands over and over again. Here we go:
When one of those female American celebrities (that healthy looking female meat) smokes just one cigarette in public, the next day there are hundreds yes even thousands of comments on her low behavior.

All kinds of American anti smoke organizations will place letters to news papers, condemn her via press releases and so on and so on. The main argument always is: "She gives an example to the youth, she is a role model and she has to take her responsibilities. With this female smoking one cigarette in public she undermines the health of our children, we must boycott her movies and throw away her songs." 

So far for smoking a cigarette.

When in hundreds of Hollywood movies constantly drug users and traders are only viewed inside a criminal window, this all is normal. Outside movie stories, in all newspapers, television shows, radio talk shows, political speeches and so on, there is only one common denominator. That is: Drugs = Criminal.

No one in America raises the question of portraying drug use this way might have it's dangerous by products; society changes that way. Once the first joint is smoked, suddenly the smoker thinks it is very normal to carry around a knife or a gun. Suddenly it is normal to indulge in criminal activities like stealing and even robberies.

Isn't this weird? Smoking one cigarette in public is condemned to the bone while guiding the youth into criminal activity is 'normal'. It is indeed a good feed for all those 'private prisons' anyway.

And don't get me wrong, of course movie script writers have a free hand to put up any story they like. It is fantasy, or not? The only problem is, all script writers do this. They have all lost their brains.
In all Western prisons there is drugs to get, entire legal systems are corrupted via this WarOnDrugs. Even the US military stays away from drugs fighting because of the problems coming with possible corruption via the money involved. 
Even here in Holland, one of the most liberal countries on drugs, up to 50 percent of prison capacity is used for 'fighting drugs'. But when I ask the local police for the details of the death of Mr. K. van Dijk in a local police cell lately, my letters are unanswered. My emails not returned and guess what happens when I make a phone call? They are never at the office...

Local police is like Americans, they are cowards.   

Yes, local police is like Americans, they are coward. But lets skip the coward stuff and zoom in on that what is known into these writings as 'The fourth plane on New York'. (With the 4th plane I mean of course the Pennsylvania plane from the 9/11 dance did not make it till the target, later this plane that did not make it was 'reloaded' to explain this in wordings Americans can understand.).
Only now some 'final report' is floating above, later I will quote a bit from that report, first a few other things:

--Some day in the past (somewhere end 2001) I decided the next: I will validate my insights towards the 9/11 dance as far as I can. So I just wrote the beginning of some story that would do 'the same', pushed the 'publish website' button and...

--Within 3 to 4 hours another plane fell from the skies, it did not fall anywhere. It fell on New York. Some airbus this time, locals know it as American Flight 587. To me life was simple, I had a mighty weapon in my hands but I felt devastated too.

--Two days later I had to go to the local headquarters of police, it turned out to be some weird sex case against me. I did not know they wanted me to interrogate for that weird stupid stuff, but could I take any chances? (Take also into account, those were the days of weird American Media reports of Osama bin Ladin and Mullah Omar exchanging daughters for fresh fuck meat.) Lets not forget that.
I was only trying to be diplomatic towards the investigating police officers and spoke words like "This week I changed writing style and within 3 to 4 hours some plane fell from the skies upon New York." (The investigating police officers tried to explain it all had to be some 'coincidence'.) 

--All in all I did not buy the details emerging from that civil plane down, why should that end tail of the plane break off without reason? In my simple emotional world I thought there was some axe work done on the outside of the plane hull. 

--There are also reports of senior aviation experts saying that the bolts of the end tail could have been loosened during maintenance from just before. This looks indeed more realistic compared to my 'outside hull axing'. And the may be loosened bolts are the reason that the tail could break off, or not my European consortium named AirBus? (Of course the maintenance workers from those days have covered their asses carefully, it is not even investigated by this commission let me just guess.)

--At last, also al Qaida operatives think it is an act of terror (although they think more around a shoe bomber explanation line of thinking). That could be true too, I simply have no insight in the design of Airbus planes and do not know if only 50 to 100 careful placed grams of explosives might do a mighty fine job. 

Now you have enough stuff in your brain to read the next Media report (and we skip those wonderful 'two planes simultaneous' works from Germany and Russia). Enjoy the official investigation in this (quoting):

There is little dispute about what happened on Nov. 12, 2001, when American Flight 587, an Airbus 300-600, crashed into a Belle Harbor neighborhood shortly after taking off from Kennedy Airport. As the jet hit wake turbulence, the pilot pushed the rudder pedals back and forth several times.

The powerful rudder, a movable flap on the tail of the plane, swung right and left, over and over, the action of the pilots creating forces on the tail that were too great. The giant fin tore off within seconds and the jet was rendered uncontrollable. The crash killed 260 on board and five on the ground.

Comment: Take in your mind the collision of the two planes above Germany, the Russian pilot only followed orders while the American cargo plane smashed in anyway. Well, I never got any answer on my email towards that American company asking "Can you dual-use anti-collision techno for explicit collisions?"

Never any answer, strange isn't it? Am I asking the wrong questions in this? Who knows.

But, back to 12 Nov 2001, I had a mighty weapon in my hands. That was a fact.     

Yet, it is also fact, that after minimizing the number of planes down for so long, right now I feel a bit tired and all I have to say is: till updates. Have a nice life or try to get one...  

Title: The ongoing story of the Axe and the Blood is a very interesting story...
        

27 Oct 2004: The study of the way societies react upon events (read real attacks or 'breaking news') is a very interesting study. Lately we have that 'breaking news' of those 350 metric tons of high explosives missing in Iraq. 350 tons equals to 350 thousand kilogram and we are talking about RDX and HMX, real high quality stuff and until now not used for attacks inside Iraq...

And, ok ok, the stuff was under seal from the Atomic agency of the United Nations and I do not know how stable it is (may be it is useless after more then a decade, I do not know). All I know was that breathtaking stupid reaction from the White House, America.
Just so breathtaking stupid, they downplayed the significance because of... Read for yourself, quote:

(CNSNews.com) - The explosives cache reported as missing from the Al-Qaqaa military installation in Iraq was not a "nuclear proliferation risk," the White House said.

White House press secretary Scott McClellan said during a press briefing on Air Force One en route to Buckley Air Force Base in Colorado on Monday that the Iraqi interim government told the International Atomic Energy Agency on Oct. 10 that the explosives were missing from the Al-Qaqaa military installation. 

The Iraqi interim government "informed the IAEA because these munitions were subject to IAEA monitoring, because they were considered dual-use materials," McClellan said.

McClellan said National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice "was informed days after" Oct. 15 and, in turn, notified President Bush. "And the first priority, from our standpoint, was to make sure that this wasn't a nuclear proliferation risk, which it is not. These are conventional high explosives that we are talking about," McClellan said.

Comment: This is breathtaking news, this makes clear that the highest political leaders in America simply do not understand how a nuke works and where the difficulties are in making one. After my humble opinion the making of the detonating high explosives is just a minor step in building a nuke, the creation and design of the detonator is even more difficult compared to making the high explosives themselves.

These people are truly weird, Iraq could not even import water pumps during the economical sanctions and now they complain that the former Iraqi government did not invest enough in the electricity infrastructure. As if electricity infrastructure components could not be used in a 'dual' way...  

Oh oh, you just don't believe the details the Americans look at. If those 350 thousand kilo is stable enough to get used we are talking big bang. And all they do is downplaying it as if it is no big deal.
And, we must take into account that these high explosives are not used until now (or carefully not reported in case it was used). There are lots of roadside bombs made from old ammunition but until now we have never seen a 'roadside bomb' made from 500 kilo RDX... (For comparison, the Lockerby Scotland civil plane downed used less then a pound of this stuff).

Now we are on RDX anyway, I didn't know it was that old, over one hundred years back was it invented (facts from globalsecurity dot org are often reliable), quoting:

Although RDX [Royal Demolition Explosive or Research Department Explosive] was first prepared in 1899, its explosive properties were not appreciated until 1920. RDX was used widely during World War II because petroleum was not needed as a raw ingredient. During and since World War II, RDX has become the second-most-widely used high explosive in the military, exceeded only by TNT. As with most military explosives, RDX is rarely used alone; it is widely used as a component of plastic explosives, detonators, high explosives in artillery rounds, Claymore mines, and demolition kits. RDX has limited civilian use as a rat poison. 

RDX can cause seizures in humans and animals when large amounts are inhaled or ingested. Nausea and vomiting have also been observed. The effects of long-term (365 days or longer), low-level exposure on the nervous system are not known.

Production of RDX peaked in the 1960s when it was ranked third in explosive production by volume in the United States. The average volume of RDX produced from 1969 to 1971 was 15 million pounds per month. However, production of RDX decreased to a yearly total of 16 million pounds for 1984. 

RDX is not produced commercially in the United States. Production in the United States is limited to Army ammunition plants such as Holston Army ammunition plant in Kingsport, Tennessee, which has been operating at 10-20% capacity. Several Army ammunition plants, such as Louisiana (Shreveport, Louisiana), Lone Star (Texarkana, Texas), Iowa (Middletown, Iowa), and Milan (Milan, Tennessee), also handle and package RDX.

Comment: The naming 'Royal Demolition Explosive' smells like some British invention, that is nice in the present context with some few hundreds British soldiers redeployed in Iraq. Royal Demolition Explosive, what lovely words aren't they?
No, I am not reciting for 500 kilo against the British, the British army is simply more decent compared to that American slime. That has to be taken into account (although the British political leaders behave weird and strange with their 'shoulder to shoulder' siding with America, weird just weird.) 

We end the day with a big compliment to retired Col. David Hackworth (with the famous website hackworth dot com). My dear reader, most of you know that I consider most of the US military total and utter slime. Total and utter cowards flying around in AC130 gunships and when they break a fingernail while firing the board cannons they get a purple heart and consider themselves heroes. Well David Hackworth has more balls because he is the first who is answering my emails! You just don't believe it, where the White House and the Pentagon stay silent and not answer on anything, David does! 

So I have to make some advertisement for his latest book that has the wonderful title 'Steel my soldiers hearts' (nice title Hack, this story is more into stealing soldier hearts so we have similar stuff.) The Iraqi operatives, the perfect cell structure, can also read David Hackworths his books. They contain may be useful information, he has also written the Vietnam primer. Here is the ad: 

Title: How is the 29 April photo collection going Hack? Thanks for your help...

ad for Hack
"Three out of four booby traps employed trip wires attached to grenades. Of these, the majority were Red Chinese. Nineteen percent of the mines and booby traps came from dud U.S. bombs and shells, the explosive material scraped out and then placed in C-ration or coffee cans careless GIs left behind."
--Col. David Hackworth
STEEL MY SOLDIERS’ HEARTS
ad for Hack
"Three out of four booby traps employed trip wires attached to grenades. Of these, the majority were Red Chinese. Nineteen percent of the mines and booby traps came from dud U.S. bombs and shells, the explosive material scraped out and then placed in C-ration or coffee cans careless GIs left behind."
--Col. David Hackworth
STEEL MY SOLDIERS’ HEARTS
ad for Hack
"Three out of four booby traps employed trip wires attached to grenades. Of these, the majority were Red Chinese. Nineteen percent of the mines and booby traps came from dud U.S. bombs and shells, the explosive material scraped out and then placed in C-ration or coffee cans careless GIs left behind."
--Col. David Hackworth
STEEL MY SOLDIERS’ HEARTS

End to the writings of this day. 

30 Oct 2004: Today it is just another lovely autumn day, although it is almost November only one or two days I needed the heater to warm the house. This is a very seldom thing, often it is much more cold so far in the autumn. A long time ago in the past, when the people in this country were poor like large parts of the world are now, there was a local habit of only heating your house after 15 October or so. Otherwise people could not make it through the winter time and you better have a few cold days in October then at the end of January or so...

There is all kinds of news observed; a scientific report indicating that on average a full 100 thousand Iraqi civilians extra died because of war conditions. (That looks far too large but it could be true). There was a new tape from Osama but only small portions of it were aired (the Americans even tried to prevent airing of the video tape, a clear sign of weakness.)

Lets start with a few excerpts from the video tape, Osama is clearly more into practicing political speech and the next are nice words that definitely make Americans pissed:

Describing Bush's actions at the school on September 11, he said: "It never occurred to us that the commander in chief of the American forces would leave 50,000 citizens in the two towers to face those horrors alone at a time when they most needed him.

"Because he thought listening to a child discussing her goat and its ramming was more important than the planes and their ramming of the skyscrapers.

"This gave us three times the time needed to carry out the operations, thanks be to God..."

Comment: Ha, this is funny! This surely makes a lot of Americans feel frustrated, a very good political move! But facts are facts and in case American president Mr. Bush would have left that classroom instantly there still would have been that large timeframe to strike. The whole of American society was taken by surprise and no swift response from the 'commander in chief' would have shrunk the timeframe.

Not often I come to the defense of Mr. Dubya Bush, but I think I would have behaved exactly the same as he did. When at that moment he had left that class behind in a state of panic, until this day he would have been criticized for that. (That is also a characteristic of American politics, they are not constructive people they only attack each other for no real reason at all.) 

OBL: I am so surprised by you. Although we are in the fourth year after the events of sept 11, Bush is still practicing distortion and misleading on you, and obscuring the main reasons and therefore the reasons are still existing to repeat what happened before. I will tell you the reasons behind theses incidents. 

I will be honest with you on the moment when the decision was taken to understand. We never thought of hitting the towers. But after we were so fed up, and we saw the oppression of the American Israeli coalition on our people in Palestine and Lebanon, it came to my mind and the incidents that really touched me directly goes back to 1982 and the following incidents. When the US permitted the Israelis to invade Lebanon with the assistance of the 6th fleet. In these hard moments, it occurred to me so many meanings I cant explain but it resulted in a general feeling of rejecting oppression and gave me a hard determination to punish the oppressors. While I was looking at the destroyed towers in Lebanon, it came to my mind to punish the oppressor the same way and destroy towers in the US to get a taste of what they tasted, and quit killing our children and women.

Comment: The above words speak for themselves, my strange contribution was may be found in my hefty desire to dance upon the grave of an organization named USZO. In 2001 they worked in a twin tower building in the South of this little city. Man oh man, did I know what kind of readers I had?
Lately I found that website again (I never update it anymore, I cannot log in and so no matter what I try), it is a pity I never saved those words of raw hate. A pity the winds of fun have wiped out the footsteps in strange sands. (A pity because I am some scientist and I always like to validate my words and insights into that what 'could have happened').

All in all the words of Osama boil down to: There is a new military axiom at the scene, it says that when there is too much 'collateral damage' there is retaliation. A simple axiom because nothing else will keep armies like the US army and that drunk Russian army in line.
Nothing else burns discipline into the minds of those 'professional' soldiers, nothing else.  

All in all I think it is very wise that Osama keeps on publishing video's and audio tapes with content like this, it is clearly full of logical reasoning so keep on that work. The fact that Americans act so strange upon only 3000 killed is more the problem of Americans and not a problem of decent people.

Title: Hey good speech man! Good speech, American slime acted cowardly on it.
        

The new video tape also drew attention at one of those silly rallies for the American presidency, here are the words of 'decency' from the Californian Terminator Arnold Schwarzenegger: 

Speaking just hours after al Qaeda terrorist Osama bin Laden derided the president and threatened Americans in a new videotape, Mr. Schwarzenegger said there can be no reasoning with "people that are blinded by hate." 
"But let me tell you something, their hate is no match for America's decency, and it is no match for the resolve and leadership of George W. Bush," he said to deafening cheers from supporters packed to the rafters.

Comment: Yes, of course Americans are the most decent people in the world. Just read this (as found on the website of retired col. David Hackworth):

As my middle of the road, Southern Democrat wife said after the four guys were dragged through the streets of Fallujah and hung on a bridge "all I want to see of that town is a smoldering pile of rubble and dead bodies".

Comment: Fallujah is a city of 200 or 300 thousand people, but since Americans are always fighting evil they do not care much upon the number of killed civilians. There is only one thing that keeps the underbelly feelings of Americans in line and that is ramming back.
Right now it looks as if in a few days that final raid on Fallujah will take place, from a military point of view it doesn't make much sense. But the Americans are constantly projecting 'evil' and 'center of insurgency' on Fallujah, I think that is not a military assessment but an emotional assessment of the situation.

And after turning Fallujah in a pile of rubble and dead bodies, just like after the Saddam capture or just like the 'transfer of power to the Iraqis' simply nothing will change. It is not for nothing I name the Iraqi cell structure the perfect cell structure...

Now a few words upon the report in the medical magazine the lancet that says on average 100 thousand Iraqis have died from the second Gulf War. I haven't read the report yet, but a few details were weird:

Annual deaths were at something like 5 per thousand before the second Gulf War and now something like 7.9 per thousand. But 5 per thousand means an average life span of 200 years (or you have a very young population), so I don't know yet.
On the statistical methods used I have no criticism, given the circumstances there is little else. It makes statistical sense to interview lots of households and simply ask questions like 'When and why did people die in this household during this or that period'. That makes statistical sense. And the reported shift from 'non violent death' to 'violent death' looks credible, this is a by product of societies in transformation AND the way Americans export the fun into their own society. (From all Western countries America has the highest 'violent death' rate in her society, may that is why they love freedom so much...)

My estimation is that total extra Iraqi deaths are not above 50 thousand, but I can very well be wrong because I lack insight into demographic upbuilding of the Iraqi population. So may be I am stupid today but 50 thousand lies well inside the border of the lancet article facts. 

Till updates. 

31 Oct 2004: In two days there will be elections in America and oh oh, how lovely the Americans react on that latest tape from Osama bin Ladin. Wordings like "A very grim reminder" and "A menacing reminder" are observed, it is clear the Americans cannot deal with the situation. There is nothing grim, evil or menacing at that tape, these simple minded people think once more with their emotions and cannot properly think.

It looks like the American society has a strong need for a boogey man, as a boogey man Osama is far better compared to that old war on drugs (drugs were the previous evil). One could ask why the Americans are that simple minded but that is irrelevant, relevant is that they need to be killed into the thousands and hundreds of thousands. That is relevant.  

To show via another example how deep American insights into political processes have declined we can read a quote from John Pike. John administers a website named globalsecurity dot com and he always has lots of reliable information around American weaponry. John is sometimes describes as a lefty with an interest in killing devices, may be that is true but the next quote from John makes clear he too does not understand what is happening in Iraq:

"One thought going around now is: 'Why doesn't Iraq look like [post-World War II] Germany or Japan, which knew they had been defeated?' " says John Pike, a military analyst who heads Globalsecurity.org in Alexandria, Va. "One of the challenges we are facing now is these people don't know they have been defeated," he says. "Fallujah will be an opportunity for them to be crushed decisively and for them to taste defeat."

Comment: Oh oh John, now you make a fool of yourself. Iraq is what I name the perfect cell structure and there is nothing the Americans can do to wipe that out. Crushing Fallujah will not change a thing, they will hunt down the miserable Americans for decades. For decades John Pike, for decades.
The Americans have estimated themselves that there are about 50 cells in Iraq, these days technological innovations sing around very fast over the Iraqi cells. So there is a safe and good communication structure invented and it has crossed the borders of culture and religious branch...
Just like I hoped one year ago, just like I hoped and asked for.

The whole concept of a 'defeated Iraq' is rubbish, just rubbish and Iraq is just one of the countries where the future is growing. Also Mr. John Pike does not understand the way modern communication gadgets have changed the way of war, guerilla war, asymmetrical war and even the old fashioned army-to-army warfare is changed far deeper then simple minded Americans understand. 

Yesterday there was a very good attack against the American slime, eight of these slime soldiers were killed and lots of wounded too. It was just as big as the blast from 29 April, just as big as the blast from Military Day Number Seven (the Giant). Quote from CNN: 

FALLUJAH, Iraq (CNN) -- A suicide car bomber was responsible for an attack on Saturday that killed eight U.S. Marines and wounded 10 others in the deadliest single attack on U.S. forces in six months, Marine Lt. Col. Michael Ramos said Sunday.

The attack on the Marine convoy happened in the rural area of Zaydan, near Baghdad's Abu Ghraib prison, Ramos said. The car used in the attack was a sport-utility vehicle.

It was the highest single-day death toll for U.S. forces since a car bomb killed eight soldiers on April 29 in Mahmoudiya, south of Baghdad.

Comment: No comment, only compliments! Exactly as big (and the same method) as from 29 April (within 30 minutes before my trial in Leeuwarden, that was GOOD!). 

Let us close this long part 38 of the ongoing story with a quote from jihadunspun dot com, only very seldom I quote from that website because when I do that I could loose support from hedge fund people and so. Here is the quote from jihadunspun:

Al-Aaded "The Biter" Rocket Enters The Battle Field For First Time 

Mujahideen deployed the Al-Aaded rocket for the first time in the battlefield yesterday. The new rocket was fired at Saddam airport and scored a direct hit on the runways there. Mujahideen wanted to disrupt the take off’s and landings of large supply carrying jets such as C-130 and that is exactly what occurred. This new weapon, coupled with attacks on vital supply lines elsewhere proved to have significant impact on occupation forces ability to engage their troops yesterday and is expected to affect their overall fighting capability. (JUS)

Comment: Rocket science is difficult science, the word 'science' is actual not correct. It must be rocket technology. Well there must definitely some rocket techno knowledge be there in Iraq, the long term military importance is clear of course. Good luck with making these Biters, nice name by the way. 

End to this part 38, there is only a little addendum below and for the rest you have to go and read part 39.

Addendum to part 38:

 

It would be nice if all parts of Western media and political figures stop that constant smearing of shit upon the Afghan Taliban. Like I already stated in October 2001: Only the Taliban could have ended that ongoing war in the Afghan landscape, there is no denying that only something like a Taliban like organization could do this.

Given the circumstances in the Afghan landscape, what else could have brought peace? What else? We must not forget that, the Taliban might have had their faults in day to day politics and so. But this all pales to the way the superpowers have fucked up Afghanistan, it all pales compared to that. We must not forget that.

And I too have hilaric fun when I read there was some minister of information that had a television in the basement. And the television, it was guarded by a guard. Sometimes it was indeed a bit out of line. But once you understand the way societies change and transform it all gets it's own logic. And my dear reader, these days have found out time in and again that when I make reasonable proposals, even the Taliban thinks upon it. And when they agree they even try to give a bit of help towards that proposal.
The Western Media portrait of this all, it is just beside reality. Just beside reality and only telling crap like 'We are the enlightened ones while they are in the dark.' This all is crap.   

Now for some quoted words as found somewhere in the BBC website:

"I was with the Taleban from the start until the end," says Abdul Nafeh, who now makes his living by selling watches. 

"They brought Islam and peace to Afghanistan and that's why I joined. 

"They're starting a serious army again. If the Americans leave, the Taleban will be back in three days. If they come here, I'll go and work with them." 

Other Kandahar residents were less sympathetic to the Taleban, but nonetheless were not prepared to forget the movement's virtues. 

"We don't want them back, but they did bring peace," says Janan Agha, a baker. 

"There was no stealing back then and the people had security. The Islamic system was so good too. But they were too restrictive. We couldn't do anything as teenagers like having picnics or playing music."

End to this part 38.

 

 

 

 

NATO NATO, what did you forget? Now I'll kiss you with love & that's a fact!
       

 

 

 

 

Support this website Support this website Support this website Support this website  

      Homepage       Disclaimer to these pages                  Part XXXVII          Part XXXIX              Index to birth of Kweb

 

 

 

 

Top of this page        Homepage        Disclaimer to these pages