(17 May 2021) A lot has happened in the last 10 days; the Germans came out hefty against the USA proposal of skipping the patents for the new vaccines. But Biontech promised to create more production facilities and on top of that third world countries could buy it at the cost price of production. Ok, accepted by me. After all we have 7 billion people to vaccinate asap & that is a giant problem because all the time the new corona virus can mutate around the new vaccins. 

I have been vaccinated myself so I have my first shot of the Biontech & Pfizer vaccine. If you get the same one and later you feel very high, for me it helped a lot by just riding my bicycle. Within half an hour you will be less high. I have to say that for me it is a very pleasant vaccine. I remember the second vaccination in the military service, I was so ill from that shot that I had to go to bed and just feel ill. 

In my hometown Groningen the third bridge was rammed out two days ago. It is completely ridiculous; in a time span of say six years three bridges rammed out by ships going too fast. Or is it?

Item 1) Yes, why not ram one more bridge out?  

 Item 1) Yes, why not ram one more bridge out?  

Every time a bridge gets rammed out the skipper gets arrested and interrogated. Also this skipper and the police found no clues of alcohol or drugs. An old experienced skipper told the local newspaper that the new skipper was rather inexperienced. He had a small incident with that same boat in Amsterdam and he explained that the shipping companies go for the cheap and hire only young skippers.

A lot of locals wanted it to see for themselves, I too of course because this was a relatively old bridge. It was not a beautiful bridge but the way it opened and closed was interesting: one end of the bridge stood on a small boat and as such it could go open via a sideway movement. It was a design from the 1930-ties. Here you see a bit of the public and how they want to lift the old bridge away so the waterway is free again. 

Now every body is blaming the skippers and may be too many of them have to little experience. But another important contribution to the present safety situation is the concentration of all bridge waiters into one hub. And from that remote hub most bridges in this city are remotely controlled.

I have had plenty of times where a bridge would go open, a ship passes through and after that just nothing happens. So the remote controlled bridge gets open and after that they forget to close it again.

A few times I asked the other people waiting: "If we all wave to the video camera's may be they will see it." Often that helps, the waiters see some movement on the video screen and all of a sudden the bridge closes again.

Likely those remote bridge waiters are sitting in a chair, eat bread and have absolutely no body movement at all during work hours. May be a method of making them more attentive is by simply making this a standing job. So no more chairs in the remote control chamber and they are only allowed to sit during a coffee or tea break.

Of course having one central control post for most bridges is much cheaper. Yet now the third bridge is rammed out and that is in total an amazing number of years of operation costs. In my view it is much better to go back to the old ways of one bridge waiter per bridge. 

Or improve the attention span in the remote control room one way or the other. We cannot blame skippers all of the time because I have waited far to often on a bridge that does not close again after the ship has passed through... 

That is what I had to say today. Till updates my dear reader. 

(07 May 2021) The horror in India continues and likely it will get a lot worse before it gets better. Ok ok the Indians should never ever have organized those super spreading events like political rallies and religious gatherings or festivals. That was super stupid so to say but the new mutations also play a big role.

Is my faith in the USA restored? No of course not but from all nations out there the USA is talking about lifting the intellect property of the new viruses so that countries like India can make their own vaccines. I applaud this idea, there might be some setbacks for the pharmaceutical industry but that is very limited: future profits will be a bit lower. In the meantime the benefits for the global economy could be much much bigger let alone prevention of the loss of life. Well if the recipes of how to make those vaccines are released of course there is not much extra production capacity the next day but at least it gives some hope to a lot of poor nations. 

Today's update is some old hobby of mine: the USA Federal deficit. I haven't written about it for a long time but right now it is like 28 trillion US$ in the red. The second item is a shorty on the acceleration of the solar wind. 

Item 1) For the time being the US$ still is the global reserve currency? Crazy!
Item 2) Still crazy after all those years: physics professors on electron spin.

 Item 1) For the time being the US$ still is the global reserve currency? Crazy!

Most people find it difficult to identify a debt bubble. In my view it is best to look at a time series of the debt growth of that particular debt bubble and see how fast it grows on a percentage basis. After that you figure out how this debt should be paid back and how fast the capability of paying the debt grows, also as a percentage of say year on year.

If the debt growth is always a multiple of the capability of paying back the debt, in that case you can be sure that you are looking at bubble formation.

When it comes to US Federal debt it is logical to compare that to GDP growth because after all it are the taxes on the GDP that supposedly are needed to service the debt and to pay it back when it matures.

In the next picture that is from the Federal Reserve Z1 release you see the percentages in the second column and the total Federal debt in the third column:     

In the last four years it has expanded by 50% or about 10% year on year. Needless to say this is a significant multiple of the underlying GDP growth. It is also clear this will not change in the foreseeable future, ok ok the present government is flirting with the idea of raising taxes on so called 'rich people' like raising the capital gains tax.  

Even if there is a change in tax policy, I do not think this debt growth can be brought under control. You have to take into account that basically the USA is a country without much reserves in the population or the broader economy. Everything is geared into making rich people richer, that has been going on for a long time, and as such the capabilities of raising taxes are limited.

It is noteworthy that there is also a lot of internal debt in the USA. These are the social security funds, in those funds you don't find money but only US Federal debt. At the time the Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan gave his approval while saying 'This makes the deficit look smaller'. Alan was right, the last number in the table 23621 billion is indeed smaller but all those years the USA has looked like it has smaller cognitive capabilities (aka this is a bunch of idiots).

Hey tomorrow all of my own financial troubles are gone: I simply borrow a million € from myself and I will be a rich man ever after... Do you think tomorrow I will be a millionaire? Of course not, but the fact that the USA has this weird internal debt simply shows that for decades they are unwilling to pay back what they have borrowed.

Yet in a lot of Central Banks around the world, the US Federal debt is part of their reserves. This shows that a lot of central bankers simply do not understand the long term evolution of their own financial system. Take for example that piece of shit Mario Draghi; why the hell did he start with that buying up of European government bonds? Idiots like Mario only drive with the pedal to the metal towards a very weird financial future: over 10 years ago I remarked you should not do this because you can never stop this.  

Of course we are now in a pandemic situation that changes the economical environment, but purchases of the European Central Bank have never stopped. And countries like Italy just do not take any action to reform because they have this ECB umbrella that sucks up a whole lot of Italian government debt.

And what to think of the present US Federal Reserve chairman? He sounds relatively smart, anyway he sounds a lot smarter than Alan Greenspan, but he said lately that inflation will be 'transitory'. Yes you read this right: transitory. That means it will come and it will go.

Just like 12 years ago: We will start buying Federal debt and as soon as we can we will stop this again. 

Yet at present day the FED buys more debt as ever before. Don't forget central bankers are often selected for psychological reasons: if they are good in soothing the public and are good at public relations that is what promotes them to be central bankers. If in the meantime they do not understand their own job, who will save us from a very very weird financial future?   

Item 2) Still crazy after all those years: physics professors on electron spin.

It is no secret that my biggest failure of the last decade was trying to explain that electrons do not have two magnetic poles but that electrons are either north or south pole so called monopoles. 

I have done my best and over the years I have more or less collected one hundred reasons as why this is impossible. Yet I failed, why? Why does logic not work?

After all physics professors are supposed to be logical creatures, if you come with a logical line of reasoning in the end logic will prevail.

Yes, but that is only when the stuff is not that important anyway.

If someone like me 'finds' the magnetic monopoles those incompetent shitholes are looking for so long. will logic prevail?

Of course not, physics professors are just like math professors: overpaid and just too much ego. So they can't talk about my idea's, that is a pity but they were a bunch of weirdo's to start with. 

Because electrons and protons carry net magnetic charge, that is why they get accelerated by magnetic fields. But hey try to explain that to one of those inverted ass holes known as university professors: you will fail!

The next picture is from a pdf I found back on my computer, it lacks a horrible amount of very important data. It looks convincing like it contains words like 'The speed of the solar wind'. But the solar wind is made from very different particles, we have electrons, protons, the usual helium nucleus and so on and so on.

But they get accelerated by the sun's magnetic fields, what do our honorable inverted ass holes think about this? Well you get a lot of 'magnetic waves' that drive the acceleration.

Good luck with that one. Anyway, we lack thousands of details but in order to show you you cannot trust the talk of the physics professors here is an oldie from the year 2001: 

That was it for this update.  

(30 April 2021) Good news: today I received a letter with an invitation for my corona vaccination. Bad news: I go to the website to make an appointment, seems I am not old enough... Well I guess they must adjust their website so it fits with the correspondence they put out. You know during this pandemic a lot of faults are made but I just can't get mad about it. People do their best and with stuff like this that has no precedent it is rather normal a lot goes wrong.

And wtf is going on in India? It is horrible, two patients in an IC bed and a lot of people waiting outside till they die or get a place inside. In reality the reported numbers must be much higher, you only count as a corona dead if you die inside a hospital. Let's hope the international help afford makes a bit of a difference, but the numbers are so high. All those millions of people, all those overrun hospitals all those this and all those that. It is a sad sad story.   

Two items for this update: 

Item 1) The Bojo said what?
Item 2) A second proof for the new little theorem of Pierre de Fermat.

 Item 1) The Bojo said what?

I don't remember the exact words but it is rumored that the UK Bojo said the next:

No FUCKING lockdown, let the bodies pile up in their thousands!

You understand I was in a total shock: As a prime minister you can't say 'FUCKING'. At no 10 everybody denied it was said, but this is definitely something the Bojo could have said. I think he has said it. It is a bit strange to say something like that if you are a pm, but I considered it more funny as shocking. But it is far away from standard protocol; as a pm you simply are a role model. People simply need that in leadership. Look at the USA & Brazil with that worthless leadership and the amount of corona deaths. Ok, now we have Joe Biden in the USA hopefully it will get a bit better.

To be honest I was rather hesitant to place the next picture. After all there are still people alive today that have been in one or more of the concentration camps from WWII. I absolutely don't want them to see such 'humor' because they will not find it funny and it might provoke old memories.  

This looks like a long lasting durable oven where many deals can be baked until perfection... Ok, next item:   

  Item 2) A second proof for the new little theorem of Pierre de Fermat.

I succeeded in making a very short proof of my newfound new little theorem of Fermat. Even for me the proof is shockingly simple and I wrote it myself! And if the Bojo would read it, would he say it is FUCKING simple? 

Of course not, the Bojo is a Brexiteer and those people are horribly bad at math. A bright and shining economical future while creating all kinds of barriers with your most important trading partners? Only a bunch of lunatics would do that.

I also reformulated the new little theorem 'just like' the old little theorem was formulated. If you click on the picture below you get a slightly larger format that is more readable compared to this 450x450 pixel version:  

Let's do the old & new Fermat little theorems for a = 125 and p = 2.
The old Fermat says 125^2 = 125 mod 2 = 1.  

Well that is very interesting but for over 3.5 centuries of time the old little theorem does not return a but a mod p. And if the prime exponent is smaller than a, you don't get your a back.

Let's now do the new version of the little theorem: we take it modulo 250 instead of modulo 2. Here we go:

The square of 125 is given as: 125^2 = 15625.
The number ap = 250 fits 62 times in 15625 with a remainder of 125:
15625 - 62*250 = 125.

With this small modification of taking the integers modulo ap and not p, all the problems of the little Fermat theorem are gone forever. Since my proof is only 3 lines long, why all these centuries did the professional math professors not cough this up?

It could be that the consensus in the math community is that 'mathematics is a social thing'. With working together you come much farther compared to working on your own.

In my view this is not correct. Of course social interactions are important, but the science of math is much more 'Me against the universe' and it is not much 'a social thing'. Making advances in math 'a social thing' is not good; the only new results you will find is stuff that even the most idiot among your ranks understand. As such progress is bounded by how smart the most idiot is inside your profession.

In physics we have the same problem: They always seek confirmation among their peers. As such it is impossible to explain it is not logical that electrons are magnetic dipoles. Now suppose a physics student has found this is not logical and wrote a paper about that. Later in file he or she applies for a job at CERN.
Guess three times what will happen...
Of course this person does not get the CERN job.   

Life is simple, just like the brain of the average Brexiteer is a simple thing.

Ok, that was it for this update. If you understand the calculation of the square of 125, at this point in time your brain is better compared to what 3.5 centuries of overpaid math professors did. Till updates & have a good life. 

(23 April 2021) The proof of the new little theorems of Fermat is finished so if you like that branch of math check it out at the other website:

Proof of the conjecture on Fermat’s little theorem. Link used:
http://3dcomplexnumbers.net/2021/04/20/proof-of-the-conjecture-on-
fermats-little-theorem/

For myself speaking I am very satisfied with this proof, it is a bit more complicated to prove the new little theorems compared to the counter examples to Fermat's last theorem. The math professors live up to their reputation: not a word from the universities upon the counter examples to the last theorem of Fermat. Once more it is validated: as a science math is completely lost in the woods because it has lost all capabilities of cleaning herself up.  

So Andrew Wiles is still the math rock star (Andrew proved the last theorem of Fermat back in the nineties). Andrew got a nice Sir title, lots of applause and that Abel prize that, if memory serves, is seven ton. These are staggering amounts of money, not that Andrew needed that because he has his high Princeton salary anyway...

And what do I get? Well I won't get the smallest possible footnote and not even 50 cents in prize money. Well that is how they are, but decades ago I already understood it is unwise to entangle my life with the professional math professors...   

Today's update is another Brexit video because for me it keeps on being a fascinating subject: How can a nation put itself outside it's main trading partners while thinking this is a good thing?  

Item 1) Here is that idiot Michael Heaver again; a 100% dumb Brexiteer.

 Item 1) Here is that idiot Michael Heaver again; a 100% dumb Brexiteer.

I watch those video's from that idiot as a form of entertainment; what stupid weird stuff has Michael found today? Michael is very good at neglecting say 90% of the news and only concentrate on those few percent that might be viewed as 'positive' regarding to the Brexit stuff.

For myself speaking I sometimes wonder if I do the same with electron spin. I think it is impossible that electrons are magnetic dipoles but all physics professors are one 100% convinced that magnetic monopoles do not exist. So am I fooling myself in a way similar to what Mr. Heaver is doing? Lately the results of the g-2 experiment came out and there was that stream of bragging how smart those physics professors are with their complicated calculations on muon & electron spin. 

Well that is very interesting, but if they are that smart why not use those cognitive functions of the human brain in order to explain the speed of the electrons coming in at the earth north & south pole that give rise to the wonderful aurora's? Those electrons come in with speeds so high that it is ionizing the atmosphere, why not calculate that? 

But back to our Brexit stuff: Last year truck drivers had to get permits just to drive to the city of Kent. It was expected that the chaos would be that big that without permits everything would get clogged deeply and fundamental.

Now this permit stuff is cancelled, the chaos is just not there. 

Here is a link to that video, the title alone is weird or let' s say it is biased:
Post-Brexit Trade Has SMASHED Remainer Scaremongering Link used:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7xmjTYNWx8 

So is this good news or bad news? Of course for lorry drivers this is good news because it is one less hurdle to take. But the reason it is not total chaos in Kent is also explained by the fact there is much less trade between the EU & UK.

All in all if you place in a lot of new hurdles for trade between your own country and your main trading partners, of course this is bad for your economy. 

So why is the Heaver guy so positive upon Brexit? Well he was an idiot to begin with. Only people who do not understand what they are talking about could think Brexit was a good idea in the long run. 

The UK population as such selected themselves in two parts: People who think the positives will outweigh the negatives and people who think the opposite.

Compare that to the career of physics professors: If they do not think electrons are magnetic dipoles, they will not have a career whatsoever. So we are looking at a biased population of professors: no experiment that proves their fantastic insights?

It is no problem over there in the land of physics professors. 

That's it for this week. See you around my dear reader.  

(16 April 2021) That Greensil scandal in the UK is very weird. Not that my own country is completely corruption free, for example it seems that a lot of our senators have a tremendous amount of secondary jobs too. Of course this is always a complicated issue; lawmakers must have access to the real economy because they must understand in detail how stuff works. But David Cameron texting the UK finance minister stuff like 'Hey bro can you help me out?' is from another dimension. David Cameron is rather pissed saying everything gets misrepresented... And those rumors David could pocket 60 million if it all panned out fine. Oh that is not presented honestly too? Only 25 million? Oh, that is just a tiny amount of pocket money, I agree what is the fuss of it all? And the weird thing is that David isn't a Brexiteer; because the average Brexiteer has such limited cognitive capabilities they are much more likely to fall into some corruption trap. 

Anyway, last week I showed you the new conjecture and I think today I found a good proof. So likely next week on the other website I can publish it.

Item 1) The conjecture has died; long live the new theorem!

  Item 1) The conjecture has died; long live the new theorem!

My conjecture was short lived; about one week or so and now it is more or less proven. When I wrote it down today on a piece of paper I had to laugh; for years I am poking fun at the math professors like 'why do you only work with fields so much and so often'. But for this proof I was glad I could pull the difficulties back to a simple field and transport the results back to the ring of integers I started in.

So am I now a hypocrite? May be, but now the proof is understandable.
And because it is not every day that somebody finds new so called 'little theorems of Fermat' is there good hope math professors will use it?

No of course not; math professors are not on earth to bring the science of math forward. They are on earth so other people can serve the giant ego of the math professors. May be you think that space or our galaxy is a huge thing, but a few billion cubic light years are just nothing compared to the ego of the math professors... 

Look, here is one of the best math professors hard at work: 

May be it is a good thing that you see for yourself what math professors do with all that tax money that is handed to them in the form of salaries & pensions. Compared to my file it is so different: I did not have a job interview in the last two decades and in my entire life I have never had a non-temporary labor contract. The difference is just too big, may be that is why they never act as a normal adult would do. 

So if it is 3D complex numbers, counter examples to the last theorem of Fermat or like now fresh so called little Fermat theorems, you will never ever hear from those people. 

Weirdly enough I also made a tiny bit of progress on that giant proof of Andrew Wiles on the last Fermat thing; I now more or less understand the opening sentence of that proof. Before that I already crashed in the first words of that proof. That symbol I crashed upon was some standard elliptic curve, you can even find it with Google so if I have time I will go on. What still puzzles me as why you would need elliptic curves to prove the last theorem of Fermat; why do the math professors think that elliptic curves are the way to go?

And why are the counter examples to the last theorem of Fermat not included in the discussion? After all if there are plenty of spaces where the whole thing does not work, shouldn't you at least mention & explain that? But I can never find Andrew Wiles talking about stuff like that. Of course Andrew is one of those perfumed professors or perfumed princes; with his Princeton professorship of course he can never react on some amateur stuff the plebs come up with...

Such is life & it gets sucher every day. 

Here you see the best math professor of all times in a cubic form contemplating the latest forms of little Fermat theorems. (Actually here name is Lilly K, she is a USA based dancer with a clothing line): 

That is what I had to say this week. Thanks for your attention & see you in a new update in the future. Till updates. 

(09 April 2021) In North Ireland the situation is more and more going out of hand. About 50+ police wounded and of course the potential for things to get much worse. That is all project fear we were told by the Brexiteers; it's not going to happen. The same Brexiteers are likely now blaming the EU for the deteriorating situation. Well that is how they are.

Let's hope for the best but it does not look good.

Today's update is a bit of cute math I only found a few days ago. It is another form of Fermat's little theorem. At this point in time I do not have a good proof so for the time being it is just a conjecture. 

Item 1) My little conjecture.

 Item 1) My little conjecture.

If memory serves it was in January that I found the first counter examples to the last theorem of Fermat. Just like expected zero reaction from the 'professional math folks'. Ha even if I solved one or more of the so called millennium problems the professional math folks would once more excel in once more completely neglecting the results found...

Well that is how they are and this behavior defines them as a group. 

A couple of days ago I found a new form of Fermat's little theorem. Fermat's little theorem is very cute and easy to understand. It works with prime numbers, say the number 7. Now all six numbers below 7, if you raise them to the power 7 and do the modulo 7 thing, you get your number back. 

Take 3, well 3^7 = 2187. And 2187 - 312*7 = 3.
In math we write this as 2187 mod 7 = 3, the modulo thing gives the reminder.  

My new found version of Fermat's little theorem is a tiny bit more complicated: you do not modulo just a prime number but you must do modulo N where N is the product of two different prime numbers, say N = pq. 

Example: take 7 and 11 as the p & q in the formula above. So we must do modulo 77. 

My little Casio fx-82 calculator says: 

7^11 - 25679568 * 77 = 7 and
11^7 - 253080 * 77 = 11.

To say it in words: 

The reminder of 7^11 divided by 77 is 7 &
The reminder of 11^7 divided by 77 is 11.

It is a cute result and for a given pair of prime numbers it is easy to prove, you just write the calculation out and that's all there is to do. At the moment I do not have a satisfactory proof but hey as time flows often new idea's come along so I do not worry that among the collection of sleaze ball math professors there will be one that is able to find a counter example...

For example, these sleaze balls were not capable of finding counter examples to Fermat's last theorem in over 350 years! These people are crazy to the bone, the only thing they are good at is keeping each other stupid...

After having said that, here is the 'cube version' of my new little theorem of Fermat: 

A bit more artistic version of the above cube is below:

Amazing how a clean math cube can transform so fast into something that resembles North Ireland at the present day.

Ok, that is what I had to say for this update. Thanks for your attention & see you around! Till updates.  

(02 April 2021) Just a few Brexit pictures and some comment on it.

Item 1) Just a few Brexit pictures.

 Item 1) Just a few Brexit pictures.

It was out say two weeks back so it is a little late but the decline in trade to and from the UK and EU is fascinating. But you cannot draw definitive conclusion from these January figures, we know for example there was stockpiling so that extra depresses the Jan numbers. Furthermore a lot of, mostly smaller, companies indicate that they temporary halted exports to the EU. It is impossible to estimate how much of them will start exporting again once they understand how to do that. Also given all the extra costs for things of animal or plant origin (stuff like health certificates) makes it difficult to estimate how much trade will recover.  

But on it's own the January figures were a disaster: 

Take for example whisky, per bottle it is relatively expensive so the extra costs that are now in place should not be the biggest hurdle. But clients in the EU don't order at least one container of that stuff but at best a few pallets. Transport companies now often refuse to load their trucks & lorries with a few pallets from here and a few pallets from there because if the paperwork on just one of them is not in order the whole truck or lorry gets rejected... 

It is weird to understand that if in my country a piece of utter shit named Geert Wilders would have gotten a political majority, this incompetent piece of shit would have destroyed our own economy in a similar manner... Every year this inside out asshole Geert comes with stuff that is always not thought through: take for example a ban on the Quran. Beside it is a weird idea to begin with, how the fuck do you enforce such a stupid ban?  

The vaccine mess.

In the EU there is still a horrible shortage of vaccines. That is a luxury problem because it is a miracle in the first place that there are so many new vaccines. But we are still exporting vaccines that are produced in the EU to other countries, also to countries that have a third nation status like the UK.

Parasitic nations like the USA & UK never export anything in significant numbers.  

So I was totally amazed when I observed the BoJo speaking in the UK parliament that there were no rules or legislation that prevented vaccines going out from the UK.

A few days later it emerged that nothing comes out of the UK, so I did not know what to think of that. Either the BoJo is incompetent by thinking the UK exports vaccines just like the EU or he is a 100% hypocrite. 

Hint: Most of the time Brexiteers are not liars but only dumb people because if you really think that being outside of the EU is good for your economy you really are a stupid person. Just like the Geert Wilders mentally ill cognitive exercises. 

I exaggerated the text a bit because the BoJo never said anything about Nazi hell hounds from the EU. But I still do not understand why he says stuff like this: could it be that the BoJo has a medical condition that more political leaders suffer from?  

Do the speaking parts of his brain work far better compared to the other cognitive and logical functions of his brain? If so he will sound rather smart while if you think about it it is total cognitive crap but phrased so elegant and smart that it sounds like real stuff.  

These were a small part of my thoughts for this week. In case you missed it, on the other website yesterday I posted post number 181 and this one is about the so called Frey elliptic curve and what happens if we place a counter example to the last theorem of Fermat into that Frey thing. If you like math, here is a link:
Side remarks on the Frey elliptic curve. Link used:
http://3dcomplexnumbers.net/2021/03/31/side-remarks-on-the-frey-elliptic-curve/ 

That was it for this update, see you around my dear reader.  

(26 March 2021) I cleaned this frontpage and dumped a lot of stuff into the archives, we have page 14 in the archive: index14.htm in case you desperately needs to find something that is now deleted on this page... 

Today I observed the BoJo stating that the UK needs to prepare for a third wave of our beloved COVID virus because 'It will wash upon our shores too'. Pardon me? In Europe we have problems with new waves because the old measurements do not work properly any longer and why is that? That is because we are hit by the UK mutant version of the COVID-19 condition. So why does the BoJo say stuff like that? In my view it only proves that the average Brexiteer is relatively stupid. 

In another development it was observed that Dominique Raab said that Europe was some kind of dictatorship because of the blocking of vaccines. Well that is an interesting contribution that once more proves most Brexiteers are stupid to the bone. The EU is complaining about the lack of so called reciprocal behavior: there is only vaccins going out from the EU to, for example the UK, but zero flows back. 

So my dear Dominique, who is actually the parasite around here? It's the UK.  

But I do not want to waste my time at the opinions of the average UK Brexiteer, physics professors are exited because of may be the so called Standard Model of physics can finally get updated! Have they figured out that electrons are magnetic monopoles? Of course not, they love to be stupid too, but at least it is less irritating compared to idots like Dominique Raab or for that matter our local idiot Geert Wilders.  

No, we take a small short look at so called leptoquarks.  

Item 1) Exiting: do the smart physics professors found a new particle?

 Item 1) Exiting: do the smart physics professors found a new particle?

Wow wow wow, even in our Dutch language the news was found: possible new particle beyond the standard model of physics was found! For me this is interesting because it is about the creation of pairs of leptons and their anti version of it all.

It is no secret I think that leptons like electrons carry magnetic charge and just like electric charge there are only two magnetic charges: north or south. Together with the two electric charges that leaves us with only four electron type leptons:
1) Electron with a north magnetic charge, 
2) electron with a south magnetic charge, 
3) positron with a north magnetic charge &
4) positron with a south magnetic charge.  

In my view when positron meets electron, they will annihilate only if both the electric charge and the magnetic charge are opposite. Annihilation will take only place when 1) meets 4) or if 2) meets 3).

So there must be collisions between electrons and positrons where just nothing happens because the two particles have the same magnetic charge.

Today I am a bit exited too because I found finally out that indeed often just 'nothing happens' when electron meets positron. And guess what, the physics professionals name that 'elastic collisions'.

At CERN they are just too fucking stupid to understand that the electron as a magnetic dipole is not logical in hundreds of ways. So if those weirdo's come up with a new particle, better think twice about what they claim:

Has a new particle called a ‘leptoquark’ been spotted at CERN?
Link used:  https://physicsworld.com/a/has-a-new-particle-called-a-
leptoquark-been-spotted-at-cern/ 

After five years of trying I decided to stop the magnetic pages and stop trying to convince the so called 'physics professionals' that electrons carry magnetic charge. If those idiots want to believe that electrons are magnetic dipoles, let them be idiots. 

In practice even if you set up collision experiments by electrons and positrons a lot of times the collision is just elastics and not of the annihilation nature. See for example the next wiki:

Electron–positron annihilation Link used: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron%E2%80%93positron_annihilation 

In my view those physics people working at CERN are all sino's (a sino = scientist in name only). If after over five years of explaining that electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles and just nothing happens, these people are all sino.

Not that I am some kind of dictator, but if logic fails year in year out there is often something going on that is not scientific. At CERN they are really crazy, for example they have tried to measure the mass of the anti-proton. Because they wanted to know if that mass was exactly the same as a normal proton. Don't get me wrong: Checking that out is of course important. But giving some kind of proof that the electron has actually two magnetic poles? Nope. That is why I consider them crazy; none of them remarks this should have experimental proof too.  

Anyway the finding that a collision of an electron and a positron is often just a purely elastic collision is just another strong clue that electrons & positrons are magnetic monopoles. In the wiki I showed you above they mumble something about 'angular momentum' because often electrons spin is named 'intrinsic angular momentum'. A lot of those retarded inbred imbecile physics people think there is actually something spinning there. So let's do a little thought experiment: 

I can't find back where the source of the pictures is, if memory serves it was the Volkskrant. And who cares if it is illegal use of graphic material anyway? That CERN garbage are just a bunch of sino's if they keep on thinking that it is 'logical' that electrons are magnetic dipoles. 

Let's wait and see if they really have stumbled upon a fifth force in nature. 

Ok that is what I had to say. Live well and think well my dear reader. 

(19 March 2021) We had elections this week, the voting was an interesting experience. I often vote in a church near to my house and all those years it was just in some side room of the church. This time it was in the main church area where the concept of 'social distancing' was taken to a whole new experience. It is my turn and I hand over my id and my voter pass, do I need to take my mask off I ask. The guy looks at the photo on my id, no take off your cap he tells me. I really had to laugh but indeed without taking my mask off you can indeed identify me with just the upper half of my old bold head...

The political left have gotten a beating, in the long run it is not good that this sector of the political spectrum gets too small. In my life I have only voted once for a left party but it is not good if that sector gets too small...  

Luckily that party of Geert Wilders got a nice shaving too, that is a good thing because it shows people do not like prolapsed assholes walking around like they are normal persons. Bah disgusting, I do not understand why people vote for this weirdo. 

By the way, on the other website I posted a post about all counter examples to the last theorem of Fermat you can make with the number 210. The math behind it is so simple that in theory a person like Geert Wilders after some thinking could understand it. And that idea almost makes me puke but anyway, here is a link: 

Counter examples to the last theorem of Fermat using the number 210.
Link used: http://3dcomplexnumbers.net/2021/03/17/counter-examples-
to-the-last-theorem-of-fermat-using-the-number-210/ 

The item for this update is 'Those times the EU annoyed me the last 10 years'.
On 20 March I added the second item. 

Item 1) Those times the EU annoyed me in the last 10 years.
Item 2) Counter examples to the last theorem of Fermat.

 Item 1) Those times the EU annoyed me in the last 10 years.

It is not a secret I am very much in favor of Europe working together. From the historical perspective it is well known we are very good at starting entire world wars and the founding fathers of the EU needed a bit of stuff from preventing flaring up such niceties again. 

A very good idea was that if we make our economies interdependent, likely this prevents a whole of of declaring war & all the niceties that come with it.  

Beside this, from the beginning this was good for our economies, while there has been not that much military conflict in all those decades. So all in all it actually works. 

When was I annoyed in the last 10 years?

Example 1: A couple of years ago an airport was expanded to give rise to a higher volume of air planes going in and out. Of course the local population was not a big fan of that and as such a local compromise was made: No extra flights in the evening.

Comes the EU flying in: This is not allowed, evening flights should be there.

And I was really on the side of evening restrictions and my first reaction was I was really pissed. But if you turn your viewpoint the other way, from the EU regulators it is well known that nations have a tendency to ultra support their local aviation business. So I understood when it comes to aviation, Europe rules & countries swallow.  

And if you think about it a bit longer: If done properly air safety increases when on a continental scale regulation gets harmonized. You can't deny that. 

Example 2: Lately my bank has changed the way I must log into my bank account. In the past all I needed was my username and a password but now they have a brand new shiny apparatus that spits out code numbers. All of a sudden beside my username & password I have to use that stupid code apparatus. The argument given was 'EU regulations'.  

I was pissed because now every entry into my bank account takes more time because I have to enter that extra code as given by the apparatus. 

But again, after giving it some thought, entry to my bank account is now more safe. 

So all in all likely on the European scale, bank fraud has gotten a tiny bit more difficult. As such I accepted the extra work needed for just to log into my own bank account. 

__________ 

That is all I could find in being annoyed with EU regulation for the last decade. Just two examples and both example if you think about it a bit longer, my emotional reaction was stupid.

Now compare that to an incompetent prolapsed ass hole like the Geert Wilders guy: This idiot, this retarded person likely has negative emotions about the EU on a daily basis. Just like all those Brexiteers have, they only do emotion and never do logic.

Item 2) Counter examples to the last theorem of Fermat. 

This method of finding counter examples is so extremely simple that I can explain the method if you know that on a standard clock if it says 15 hours you know it is 3 'o clock. That is clock arithmetic, for a standard clock it is said you count the numbers 'modulo 12'. For example 33 = 21 = 9 hours. And 12 = 0, that is important.

Why is that important? Wel if you multiply 3 and 4 you get 12 and in algebra the pair 3 & 4 are known as a pair of divisors of zero. That means 3* 4 = 0. This has all kinds of interesting consequences, for example if we add 3 and 4 and square it we get:

(3 + 4)^2 = 3^2 + 2*3*4 + 4^2. Remark the 2*3*4 = 4*12 fades to 0 because 12 = 0.
That is how I find expressions like 7^n = 3^n + 4^n.

Now my latest post on the other website is about stuff like this with the number 210 instead of the number 12. I have chosen 210 because that is the product of the first four prime numbers: 2*3*5*7 = 210. You can split the four prime numbers into seven different groups with each two factors that multiplied always give 210.
In the next picture you see those seven different ways of splitting: 

Now I was very hesitant to use this because it is all so utterly simple. I more or less expected this to be some standard example known for centuries as a counter example to the last theorem of Fermat.

Of course a lot of my readers on this website have no clue what this last theorem is, it is a negative result from a long long time ago. About 3.5 centuries back Fermat found that it is impossible to have four integers such that x^n + y^n = z^n. This for powers n greater than 2 because for n =2 this is the theorem of Pythagoras. 

And for the theorem of Pythagoras there are plenty examples that work like in
3^2 +4^2 = 5^2.  

So I was rather hesitant, but I just could not find these counter examples online and that made me scratch my head. Could it be true that the professional math professors skipped this easy to find result for say 350 years? It looks like it, these easy to understand calculations are not a standard counter example to the last theorem of Fermat.

Once more the overpaid math professors have proven not to be worthy of their huge salaries. And my dear reader, mark my words, even if these counter examples are easy to understand, they will never ever talk about them. Even if you are a young reader in the far future you will never observe a math professor saying stuff like 'Hey here we have a bunch of counter examples to the last theorem of Fermat'. 

If you click on the next picture you will land at the last post on this easy going math:  

Ok, that is what I had to say. Till updates.  

 (09 March 2021) I was just reading some news on Google news, I was at peace with myself and I felt in harmony with the rest of the universe. Says that retarded Google news: Delft quantum computer will not work.

Gone is my harmony and all that peace: I could tell you that years ago and as such nobody is interested of course. This is now the third time I observe exactly the same news about Delft university and their quantum computer based on Majorama fermions. 

Item 1) There are too many overpaid perfumed princes, WHY?

 Item 1) There are too many overpaid perfumed princes, WHY?

It is no secret I have been telling for over five years that the overpaid physics professors have electron spin a tiny bit wrong: If you think about it, it is impossible that electrons are magnetic dipoles. All this stuff from the overpaid professors does not make much sense; if electrons were magnetic dipoles they could not be accelerated by magnetic fields. 

If you look at the sun for example, you see acceleration of plasma all of the time. So right in your face the dipole nature of electron magnetism can be doubted.

Now those Majorama fermions are very interesting because they are supposed to be there own anti-particle. The Delft weirdo's combined an electron with a hole (a hole is supposedly a positive electric charge) and as such they thought to have constructed Majorana fermions as a composite particle. 

And tons of blah blah blah that you can make topological quantum computers with that stuff. Years ago it was easy to foresee this would never fly, just like nuclear fusion will never work because of the acceleration of the plasma will make all fusion reactors unstable in a short notice of time.

With the deserved failure of Delft to go the path of the Majorama's it is worth mentioning that the university people keep on not understanding anti-matter in particular the positron or the anti electron. 

They are correct in stating a positron must have a positive electric charge. That is correct, but the electron spin should also be opposite. And if you think that electrons are tiny magnetic dipoles, what the fuck do you mean with 'opposite spin'? 

Electrons simply have a magnetic charge just like they have an electric charge. That makes logic if you think about it. Why in chemistry you only have the electron pair that binds the diverse atoms? Why in nuclear physics in the orbitals of atoms you only have unpaired electrons and paired electrons? That's just not fucking logical if electrons really would have two magnetic poles, if they really were magnetic dipoles.

The only thing university people are good at is being totally incompetent all of the time. 

For over five years I have been explaining this kind of stuff and 100% nothing happens: WHY do we only appoint idiots at professor places in universities? 

It is just like math professors: it is just a bucket filled with shit. If you are a physics professor and you think electron spin means electrons being magnetic dipoles, well welcome into the bucket of shit you call home.

In the picture below you see two overpaid perfumed princes in action: The perfumed prince on the left is Leo Kouwenhoven who's ideas about Majorama fermions did not pan out entirely as expected. The perfumed prince on the right is our king. It has to be remarked that although overpaid, all in all our king is not under performing like the math & physics professors do on a daily basis...  

It is totally disgusting: After five years of explaining that electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles I am observing this overpaid retarded dumb shit doing what they are good at.

It is disgusting: For over five years university people just never give proof to their retarded insights upon electrons spin and I am supposed to be at harmony with the universe because I have my minimal money as an unemployed person?

Please do not make me puke, if you do not want to know more about electron spin it is fine by me. But do not show your stupid face in 'news articles' like this. 

Oh oh university of Delft, after all these years just once more: Why not show your FUCKING  proof that the electron is a magnetic dipole?

What you say, I cannot hear you? Oh you say next week there is a fresh batch of perfume & you are focused on that. Ok, that is fine by me but please do not pretend to write about science if the only thing you are interested in is the latest perfume.

Source of the pictures used: 

Onderzoeker Kouwenhoven erkent fout: deeltje voor quantumcomputer niet gevonden

With this speed of progress it will be about 500 years before the physics professors find out that electron spin is monopole in nature and not the dipole magnetism they assumed all those centuries. 

End of this update on retarded perfumed princes. Till updates. 

(06 March 2021) To be honest I don't have much to say this week. Funny news was coming from the UK where in a lot of news papers fake news articles emerged hailing the success of Brexit thus far. It was all 'government sponsored' aka advertisements, articles pretending to be news but in fact advertisements. 

It has to be remarked however that most of those articles indeed said they were sponsored articles so all in all the UK is still more or less a normal functioning democracy... Anyway for a couple of weeks I wanted to post the old photo's from below and because I do not have much to say let that be our item: 

Item 1) Fishing for leave & No deal is no problem!

 Item 1) Fishing for leave & No deal is no problem!

There are significant slumps in trade both from the UK to the EU as the other way around. So despite the fact there is some rudimentary deal, just being outside of the EU is causing a whole lot of trouble. 

From the get go in 2016 it was of course a stupid idea, but it was hard to foresee in detail how much could go wrong. For example I never expected the trouble of the UK fisheries that high, I thought that only with tariffs put on fish the UK fisheries could be slaughtered. But no it all goes spontaneously down hill fast so that is a good thing because the more UK fishermen go bankrupt in the long run that is better for the EU fishermen.

Here is one of the pictures that I wanted to include in this website, after all this picture stands for a lot of what was happening: Only emotional ventilation of feelings while in practice about nothing was carefully thought through: 

This Brexit stuff keeps on an amazing thing: in my home country a shithole named Geert Wilders is of similar stupidity. Always the Geert weirdo is complaining about EU this and EU that while the tax money our shithole is paid with comes in large part from the economical developments from the last 2 decades. 

There is no difference explaining to Geert or the average Brexiteer that being outside the EU is a stupid thing to desire; low IQ people often do not realize how low IQ they actually are.

For the UK the present situation is damaging for their economy but if ever my own country would do the same, relative there would even be more economical damage. We transport a whole lot of stuff to the rest of the EU. Suppose all things arriving in the Rotterdam port would be subject to tariffs if it is exported to the rest of the EU?

From the above picture I made one of those 'cubes' that look much more cute compared to a shit hole like Geert Wilders:  

At last a few words about financial derivatives. Now Amsterdam has managed for at least one month to be the largest stock trading platform in the EU, what can be said about financial derivatives?

For reasons I do not understand, trading financial derivatives seems to be far more lucrative compared to trading in stocks. Why is that? I do not know.

A stock market like the Amsterdam one is a platform that facilitates trading in stocks of companies but they cannot create stocks out of thin air. Ok ok they have some market making obligations but it is not that if for example Shell is relatively high the Amsterdam stock market thinks like 'hey lets create a bit more Shell stock and sell it now prices are high'.

As far as I know platforms that facilitate the trading in financial derivatives are bound to the same: they are not allowed to create derivatives out of thin air. They only facilitate between sellers and buyers of those derivatives.

In my view a lot of those trading in derivatives should go to the EU now the UK is outside of our financial markets. It is completely ridiculous that if EU companies want to buy protection against currency fluctuation like in the €, we must go to London or New York. 

These are vital for our EU economy, we should do that ourselves. And given the detail those kind of financial derivatives are far more lucrative points to the likelihood that the EU can craft far better financial products compared to what London or NY has to offer. 

Ok, that were my thoughts for this update. Let's slaughter the London city where it comes to financial derivatives & for the rest enjoy life as long as it lasts... 

(25 Feb 2021) Oh oh those Brexiteers: For decades they complain about all that bureaucracy that is coming from the European institutions. And now it is often you need to fill in 71 pages of bureaucratic stuff while in the past it were only 2 pages for the transport of just one lorry of goods... 

A lot of Brexiteers think the present troubles from this year emerge from the EU being 'mean' or that 'they want to teach us a lesson'. That is not how it works, because the EU is a union of states all stuff is formalized as far as possible. As such the UK now has the status of being a third nation and all third nations are treated the same. 

Take for example those shellfish problems that cannot be exported any longer to the EU. If that were allowed then for example all African costal nations could say 'Hey we too want to export unpurified shellfish to the EU. Of course we cannot have that, the UK is now a rule taker as all other third nations...

Today I want to do a tiny bit of math. You can say isn't that what the other website is for? Yes of course but this is too simple for the 3Dcomplexnumbers.net website. We do some simple stuff every body knows: the abc formula for solving quadratic equations. 

Item 1) The two forms of the abc formula for solving quadratic equations.

 Item 1) The two forms of the abc formula for solving quadratic equations.

In about 1982 I found a cheap math book. It was a small pocket book, just over one hundred pages and it was more or less only formula's and very little explanation. That was before I had to do military service and as such also before I became a math student. I was totally fascinated by those Fourier series; how could a bunch of sines produce a tooth saw shaped function? 

That pocket book also contained the two forms of abc formula. And although it is very easy to prove these two forms are the same, for me it was a surprising result.  

If you want to prove this you must use the first formula with the 'plus' sign and equal that to the second formula with the 'minus' sign. That is why in the first abc formula you see a plus-minus sign while in the second abc formula this is a minus-plus sign. 

Anyway if you work out this equation you will find that 4ac = 4ac. But 4ac = 4ac is an expression that is obviously true and from that you can conclude that your starting equation was also true.

In theory that is how math is supposed to work; finding things that are true. In practice like in any other social structure the internal communication is always more like a greatest common divisor. So if math professors talk to each other, they keep it always as simple as possible so that even the most idiot math professor will understand these internal communications. For example '3D complex numbers do not exist' is one of those internal communications that even the most idiot math professor can understand and repeat when needed.

As such those simple statements like '3D complex numbers do not exist' become a binding factor inside the profession of mathematics. Inside physics you have the same kind of untrue simplifications like 'If you cut a magnet in two, you always end up with two smaller magnets'. Because this is something even the dumbest physics professor can easily remember stuff like that takes a life on it's own and as such becomes a binding factor in the social structure of physics professors. That makes it logical as why physics people without any experimental proof talk about electrons as if they have two magnetic poles.      

But hey let that university crap be what it is: the crap of a social structure known as a university. I hope the next picture is a bit readable, anyway it is still the two ways of abc formula for solving a quadratic equation:

Ok, have fun with your proof of the two abc formula's & till updates. Updated one day later: I found a video about a person named George Eustice, I never heard about him but he claims the EU has been flip flopping on the shellfish detail. The video is made by Maximillian Robespierre in his 'Fool of the week' series. Maximillian often thinks that Brexiteers are lying, in my view that is often not correct. Brexiteers are not lying, they are just more stupid and as such it might look as if they are lying. Compare it to the physics professors; in the last five years have I ever said they were lying about electron spin? No I have not done that. Those professors might be telling nonsense about electron spin but they only do their best, they are not deliberately lying or so.

Anyway, here is the video:
Fool Of The Week - Brexiteer George Eustice
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQ2xYjQzRI0

That was it for this extra update. Till updats. 

(19 Feb 2021) Brexit is going as good as it possibly can be; it will likely take a few more months before the majority will realize this is bad for the UK economy. On the other hand the average Brexiteer has cognitive capabilities that are below of that of the population. So they will blame the corona pandemic on their future economical development.

In this update two items: An old Brexit picture from 2016 and the Microsoft Bing search engine is going bonkers again on the 3D complex numbers (it goes bonkers in the image search...). 

Item 1) This old picture again.
Item 2) Bing search engine going bonkers again.

 Item 1) This old picture again.

It keeps on being a fascinating subject; how can a society like the UK society do all this weird stuff? You can argue that the ruling elite like the conservatives do not understand on a detailed level how the economy actually works. Not that I myself understand all the fine details of a continent wide economy like we have here in Europe, but I do not claim retarded stuff that it is better to be 'outside of Europe'. 

But in the UK the anti-EU sentiment has slowly been growing over the decades. Why it has never cleaned itself is unknown to me. May be only after the stuff runs out of hand there will be some changes. I do not know and I do not care, it is just fascinating to watch this weirdness going on and on and on... 

It is a weird mindset they have over there; a dying Europe?
By the way, how are your fisheries going my dear UK? 

 Item 2) Bing search engine going bonkers again.

A couple of months back when I did a search on the Microsoft search engine Bing on my hobby of the 3D complex numbers, to my surprise I had total dominance. Over half of the pictures shown were from my other website upon 3D complex numbers.

So later I wanted to write an update on that detail but at that point in time all of a sudden the picture search was back to normal. Ok, it is better that things are normal but if Bing goes bonkers on a search phrase like '3D complex numbers' it is not that an extra amount of people die from that for no reason at all.

So it is not much of a real problem, it only shows that the Bing search engine can make a bit more improvements. There is the potential to get better to say it diplomatically...

I made a screenshot from this simple search, if you click on the picture below you get large version. Or you make a Bing search upon '3D complex numbers' for yourself...;)

Anyway, it is not guaranteed that in the future this kind of picture search on Bing will stay the same. Here is the fun:  

So once more and likely for a short time I have full spectral domination on those Bing search results. That can be classified as a temporary success. 

But in my life there are also giant failures: the physics professors still completely for the full 100% do not want to engage the idea that electrons can't be magnetic dipoles. Electrons are magnetic monopoles, but the internet search engines of this world only say 'Go fuck yourself'.

Ok, let's leave it with that. Till updates my dear reader.  

(13 Feb 2021) Ah, the first 'weaponization talk' of UK financial services observed. It is only two stupid Brexiteers talking to each other so it is not UK government policy or so. But we cannot have it that for example government bonds of EU countries run into trouble; essential financial services is something we have to do ourselves now the UK is a third nation.

Item 1) Brexit dividend: Amsterdam stock trading volumes soaring...:)

 Item 1) Brexit dividend: Amsterdam stock trading volumes soaring...:)

The numbers are staggering, this is not some calm year on year percentage growth. Nope, compared to December last year trading volume on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange is four times as big in January this year. On top of that trading in CO2 emissions went from the UK to my beloved Amsterdam.

Without doubt now volumes are soaring there will be all kinds of extra costs to be made by the AEX but I want to urge that as soon as possible trading costs should come down. That means that for the AEX (that is a company in itself) it is not good if four times the volume means four times as much profits; nope! It is not going to happen that with two fingers in the nose they will make boatloads of money.

Our financial markets should work as efficient as possible, in the long run that is best for our economy. Now a large part of my own portfolio is composed of financial stocks and bonds so I love the dividends and the coupons but please stay normal: the thing known as the economy where actual stuff is made and a lot of people have a job is far more important. 

Well let's hope for the best, after all we only have one month of soaring trade volume in. Let's try to consolidate that. 

But the numbers are truly staggering; Daily volume in Amsterdam in January was above the daily average in the UK over the year 2020. That is boink boink bonkers! 

Never forget that the Brexit rather likely will be very bad because it is a stupid idea in the first place. So over time frustration in the UK will build up more and more and because for decades they blame a lot of things that go wrong inside the UK on the EU we must be prepared to take these matters into our own hands.

We must get free from the expensive shackles of the London financial hub.

It is important that this all gets organized a bit efficient so that the costs of financial services are low. A simple tactical reason for that is that the BOE came out with a statement just a few days ago that this 'countryfication' of financial services away from their London thing will only bring higher costs... Let's hope that a few years down the line the BOE still doen not understand what has struck them and why it was so violent...;) 

Ok, today I observed the first video about weaponization of the UK financial services industry. It doen not amount to much because it is from a guy named Michael Heaver and that is not a very smart person. I mostly look at Michael his video's as a for  of entertainment; what retarded stuff does this person have today? I am always exited to hear the latest insights on why the Brexit is going so good...

Anyway Michael was talking to another Brexiteer named Ben Habib and this Habib guy came up with a simple scheme to drive up the costs for EU government bonds to 'go through the roof' as he said himself. 

Again: it does not amount to much. I do not think at this moment in time the BoJo government is working on plans like that. But the last four years of USA politics have learned us it can go very fast from just 'standard a little bit crazy' to the daily madness we had to endure from the USA over that last four years. 

Anyway this is how this low IQ weirdo Ben Habib looks, if you click on the picture you will land at the Youtube video.  

Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDT5cSOyaRY
Silly title of the video:  Boris Urged To STAND UP To EU Bullying

Ok, that was it for this update. For myself speaking I hope we more or less succeed in developing efficient financial services inside Europe. Don't forget that however the trading volumes as quoted above are spectacular, it is only one day in making Europe a better place to live in. 

Till updates my dear reader. 

(08 Feb 2021) On 08 Jan so exactly one month ago I showed you that video from a glass-eel farmer that now cannot export to the EU any longer. That farmer was in the past very upbeat about Brexit because of 'all the possibilities' it gave for expanding the economy. Now in that video there was also some Brexit reporter routinely talking stuff like 'But we study this for two decades and constantly there is all kinds of red tape coming from the EU' and at first I was impressed because of the words 'We study this for two decades'.

When I would study something for two decades I would know a lot about it; take for example the 3D complex numbers that over the last 30 years have been studied by me about one decade long. If you study things for a long time your knowledge starts to accumulate faster and faster and at this point in time it is likely that on this little planet I am the guy who knows the most about that subject.  

Now I came across this horrible video from Jacob Rees Mogg and Jacob was interviewed by somebody from the Institute of Economic Affairs and I just could not believe my eyes and ears. So that is our item for this update. 

Item 1) Is Jacob Rees Mogg a totally retarded person?

 Item 1) Is Jacob Rees Mogg a totally retarded person?

The guy from the IEA asks Jacob the next question: Now that we are out of the EU we can make our own legislation and as such we could get rid of the VAT on female hygiene products, can you give us some more examples of how we can benefit and change legislation now we are out of the EU?  

To my utter surprise Jacob explains there are many many bad legislations and rules directly related to the EU. And he explains it will take time to change them because of the legislating process and the way parliament works and the troubles with the pandemic that slows the stuff. 

But he just does not give one fucking example! 

Those guys have studied the evils of the EU for two decades or longer and the only thing they come up with are VAT free tampons... 

Let me repeat it once more:
The only thing they come up with are
VAT free tampons! 

And Jacob, ultra smart as he is, throws the ball back by saying the people from the IEA should inform the ERG (that is the European research group from our cognitive here Jacob) so that they can take action. 

I have seen this more often; Every time a Brexit person complains about all that legislation from the EU and you ask them 'Can you give just one example of a law that is bad for the UK?' they never come up with only one evil law. 

So this is more confirmation of what I wrote lately when I compared the Brexiteers to a modern platoon; since Brexit is a stupid idea in the first place it only attracts people with diminished cognitive capabilities.   

No nice pictures today because I did not have the time, but nine minutes into the next video you can find some deep fundamental proof that Jacob is in fact a total retarded person: There are thousands and thousands of... All blah blah blah stuff. 

In Conversation with The Rt Hon Jacob Rees-Mogg
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGOzTGUwqQ8 

Now we must not loose ourselves in all these day to day tactical things, in the long run the EU must get free from the shackles of the UK financial city. Are these 'financial services' good for the EU now the UK slowly is becoming a hostile enity?

Or am I exaggerating a little bit here? No I am not, now the UK has a third nations status it cannot be that vital financial services come only from London. The BoJo is more or less a reasonable person but as soon as the UK people elect a donald trump clone, the financial services of the UK will be used as a weapon against Europe.

Ok, let's leave it with that. Till updates. 

(03 Feb 2021) A lovely row erupted a few days ago when the EU threatened to temporary lift the North Ireland protocol. The Brexiteers were in all states while of course non of those cognitive handicapped people remembered that just a few weeks ago the BoJo did exactly the same. And the UK themselves have a list of medicines that are forbidden to export, but when the EU wants to do something at the vaccination situation we are of course pure evil... 

In the update we take another look at the niceties of the Brexit and once more we will understand that as a group the Brexiteers lack conitive capabilities (on average they are more stupid compared to the average of the population). 

Item 1) Is trade with fast growing nations important? Brexiteers say yes.

 Item 1) Is trade with fast growing nations important? Brexiteers say yes.

Brexiteers, retarded and stupid as they are, now constantly tell that the situation at the border is perfect and all that stuff from 'project fear' just did not materialize. But as a matter of fact a lot of food like fish and meat just can't be exported because it takes so long that it starts to rot. So for the time being it is bye bye fisheries. For shell fish it seems to be the same; normally they got produced in the EU because in the UK they do not have the facilities. But decade old rules say that for safety only processed shell fish can be imported from third nations... I do not understand why those UK fishers specializing on that kind of food never ever thought that through before the Brexit was there. Once more: Brexiteers are more stupid than the average person and the fishermen voted overwhelmingly for Brexit.  

As far as I am concerned: to the hell and beyond with those weirdo's.  

Wine also seems to be a problem. The UK has a relatively large wine importing industry and just like in my own country due to climate change it is more and more possible to make local wines. Anyway the trade in wine is also falling apart and that is a good thing because it confirms what I said in the very beginning: Brexit is a stupid idea. 

But beside Brexit being a stupid idea, the UK government itself is often also rather lunatic. The most weird story was from some expensive second hand watch trader. Think for example at a Rolex. Normally as a trader you pay VAT to the government and only that added value gets taxed. Remember VAT = Value Added Tax. But now all of a sudden if they want to sell an expensive watch to some customer in the EU they must pay VAT over the full price... So if this trader buys an expensive watch for 8000 pounds and sells it for 10000 pounds all of a sudden the VAT must be paid over 10000 instead of 2000 pounds... Once more: Brexiteers are stupid. 

In a video from 'A different bias' it is claimed over 50% of the lorries leaving the UK are empty. If true a lot of export has just fade overnight from 31 Dec to 01 Jan... Once more: that is a good thing because it confirms what I thought about this all.
Click on the picture if you want to see that video: 

Link used:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAHeuyJrKhM

Lately I oberved Nigel Farage stating that it was better for the UK to seek alliance in trade with fast growing nations like those from the Trans Pacific Partnership nations. Nigel Farage is like our own Geert Wilders (also anti EU all the time year in year out). If I listen to the logic of people like that to my mind comes a lot of gay porn video's where the males have anal prolapses and they love it. I do not love that and find it disgusting. Just like the logic of Geert Wilders or Nigel Farage is disgusting to me.  

So how useful is it to trade with fast growing nations? Let's compare two nations say Vietnam and Germany. I did not check if the next numbers are actually correct but you will get the picture easily: 

The Vietnam GDP per capita is about 2500 €, the German per capita is about 40000 €.
Suppose without all this pandemic stuff the German GDP grows say 2%, per German citizen that is a growth of 800 €.
Suppose in a particular year the Vietnam GDP expands by 10%. Well that is about 250 € per capita Vietnam citizen... 

Do you see how retarded the logic of Nigel Farage is? Vietnam is at the other side of the globe, why should Vietnam people want to buy UK stuff? The Nigel guy is a shitshow on all levels possible. 

Luckily not all things in the UK are going from bad to worse. They have a new under secretary that handles immigration! And I was just flabbergasted; why can't we have political leaders like that?

So instead of listening and looking at another worthless piece of shit like Priti Patel the UK males can look at this female doing the immigration stuff in the UK: 

Now what is wisdom in this time and age? Is wisdom found in complaining that if we look at the average European parliament there are never good looking sluts dressed in latex clothing? Or do we need more math inside the heads of prolapse Nigel Farage & Geert Wilders? And what does the bible say about pandemics?

Ok, that was it for this post. 

For older updates see the archives at index14.htm or go to the oversight of the archive pages.