(26 Nov 2015) A short update on the troubled
stuff between Turkey & Russia.
Item 1) On a Russian bomber plane downed by
the Turkish air force.
Item 1) On a Russian
bomber plane downed by the Turkish air force.
The stuff is very simple: The surviving
Russian pilot claims they never entered Turkish territory while
the Turks said they did.
More stuff is very simple: When you have two
guys like Erdogan and Putin with the ego's they have, stuff like
this is unavoidable.
But it seems that indeed the 'borders'
between Syria and Turkey are in dispute and if the Russians used
the borderlines as viewed from Damascus and at the same time bomb
out the Turkmen inside Syria, this was a thing waiting to
So for the time being, from the viewpoint of
being the founder to the WarTribunal and new (fresh) information
could change my verdict, the verdict is very simple:
The Russians should check the borderlines
between Syria and Turkey as they use them. If they used the
borderlines as defined by the Assad regime, the Russians
themselves are mostly responsible for what has happened.
End of the verdict.
Now you can look me in the eyes:
In the meantime it would be smart if the
Russians stop this stupid economical embargo thing against Turkey.
If on the television I observe Russian talking heads stating that
about 15% of all exports to Russia are not within the rules, why
come into action right now?
That is childish and this once more gives a
solid proof to the fact the Russians are too stupid to grow their
own vegetables and craft their own meat and fish.
And that while the Russian federation is the largest nation in
square miles on earth: how much more proof of stupidity &
utter laziness do you need???
End of this update, till updates.
(21 Nov 2015) Six pages about integral
calculus done with matrix diagonalization, that is our item for
Item 1) Integral calculus done with matrix
Item 1) Integral
calculus done with matrix diagonalization.
Back in 2013 I already gave a proof about
that nasty looking integral using the pullback principle. In 2013
when I found that strange principle that connects all kinds of
exponential curves & circles in the diverse dimension, I named
it at first:
Massive modified madness.
Later when I understood a bit more about the
stuff I changed the name to the pullback principle where you
simple pull back the higher dimensional curves to the complex
plane unit circle.
But there are still problems with the
pullback principle; I am convinced it works always in all
dimensions but I cannot prove that. So it is good I can update the
old proof with a new one skipping the pullback principle and now
using matrix diagonalization...
is the latest math update.
Ok, let me now try to upload the stuff with
the ftp protocol; that is much more labor some because now I have
to track all files that are changed and upload them file by
(19 Nov 2015) Shit man, without warning this
website was moved to one of those modern SSD hard disk servers.
And as such I was told I could no longer update this
But with a bit of ancient technology known as
the ftp protocol it looks like I can update both text and
pictures. Two items for today's update:
Item 1) I started a new website on math only.
Item 2) My condolences to the Russians and the French.
Item 3) Google ranking of 3D complex numbers.
Item 1) I started a
new website on math only.
Since there is still zero point zero reaction
from all universities upon that nice stuff known as the 3D complex
numbers and since I could no longer update this website I thought
let's make a deep investment of 50 € and start a new website
using a bit more modern technology:
The benefits of this new website are that at
least I can make categories with new updates so that brings a
better structure to the story told. But there are also drawbacks,
for example websites like this new one are more or less clear cut
to be viewed on all kinds of devices like a standard desktop
computer to mobile phones and everything in between.
This causes pictures to be scaled into unreadable stuff...
Well we'll see what comes to it because you
can't keep on hanging in the past...
Item 2) My condolences
to the Russians and the French.
On 05 Nov I was a bit rude for the Russians,
so I feel like making an apology for that; I should have
formulated it a bit different but one day later on 06 Nov already
I could no longer upload via the usual means.
Ok, it is obvious that I was a little bit
frustrated because of the remarks made by Russian officials as we
the Dutch were to stupid to do investigations into our own air
crash problem over the Ukraine. But that is no excuse, so sorry
for being too rude.
In another development the French authorities
raided a house that supposedly had the local ringleader who more
or less was behind the terror attacks from last weekend. They used
about 4000 rounds of ammo and lots of grenades.
In the end identification of the remaining
bodies had to be done via DNA sampling...
That is very good my dear French; give that
shit what it deserves.
Now what Daesh or the islamic state concerns:
Why do these people think they can win it from countries that have
nukes? In the end when Daesh would become a serious security
threat (I do not expect that because no Muslim country can make
even good handguns or so) we simply will nuke it out.
It will be the last option of course because
by nuking it out you also kill all those children and females. But
in the end my dear IS, I will make you look into the mirror of
your own actions...
Item 3) Google
ranking of 3D complex numbers.
This item is very simple: If you make an
internet search on the phrase '3D complex numbers do not exist'
weirdly enough the website keeps on popping up with the five
dimensional complex numbers.
I think that this is caused by the fact
that the golden ratio is mentioned, so I do not think that people
are enthusiastic about five dimensional complex numbers but that
it gets a lot of clicks because of the mentioning of the golden
Ok, in a future update I will hang in the
answer to the math challenge as posted on 31 Oct below. We are
going to use diagonalization of matrices to do integral calculus
& as usual the professional math professors will see water
burning one more time...
(05 Nov 2015) Oh oh, those poor Russians.
This year they insulted us the Dutch via stating we were not
capable of conducting a good investigation into the air plane
crash above the Ukraine. A short time later they said an
international investigation should do the thing instead of those
dumb Dutch folks.
A short time later the Dutch tried to get the
United Nations involved, of course the Russians vetoed it, drank
the Vodka all night long and laughed about us.
It is good stuff turns around, a very good
lesson for the Russians.
For example I would never say the Russians are to stupid to lead
Let's leave it with that because I only want
to place a teaser picture for the next math update. So that is
itme number one:
Item 1) Teaser picture for a new way of
integral calculus using diagonalization.
Item 1) Teaser
picture for a new way of integral calculus using diagonalization.
Two days ago I was mister Perfect; a new way
of computing very difficult integrals very easy and what could
Well two day ago I just thought: What would
happen if you do it along a straight line?
And to be honest: my world crumbled. Some
things are still alive, a whole lot of things are dead. If the
outcome of your integral is path dependent, this changes
But let's not get emotional because for years
and years I knew this would be coming.
So only a teaser picture from paradise where
they do not have to worry about imperfections.
In a few days I will hang in this new method
for calculating integrals like this using diagonalization. (Yet for the time being I do not
understand why this is path dependent so only a few paths will get
you to the correct answer.)
(31 Oct 2015) It would be tempting to comment
a bit on the downing of that Russian civilian plane over the
Sinai, but why speak when timing is in perfection?
Therefore only a small math problem for the
mathematical community out there:
Item 1) Solve this integral with existing
Item 1) Solve this
integral with existing techniques.
The problem is very simple; there is a
function and a domain of integration.
So craft proofs that the next problem is
solved without doubt:
End of this update, till updates.
(26 Oct 2015) It all went more smooth than
expected, so the new html file on magnetism is ready one day
Item 1) Ten reasons why electrons are
Item 1) Ten reasons
why electrons are magnetic monopoles.
Ha, this update will definitely meet a very
silent reaction from the so called 'professional professors'.
These pseudo scientist in the first place accept that electrons
are magnetic dipoles without any experimental proof.
And now the emperor is without clothing, the
people from the universities will also have lost their voice. Or
talk that stupid stuff like:
Hey dude, electrons are magnetic
Shallow thinkers is what they are and for the
time being this will not change.
Teaser picture, click on it to land at the new html file on
End of this update, till updates.
(22 Oct 2015) Another update using quantum
mechanics to prove that electrons are magnetic monopoles. Physics
professors do not understand very good why the measurement of spin
is so difficult to understand. They often say stuff like 'For some
strange reason nature does not allow to measure it in two
directions at the same time.
But I found a simple way to measure it in two
and three directions demonstrating that these physics professors
do not understand their own business...
Item 1) For some strange reason nature does
not allow for...
Item 1) For some
strange reason nature does not allow for...
Physics professors when giving lectures in
quantum mechanics use a lot of higher math to make their point.
Now of course that is not forbidden if this math is meaningful and
to the point.
In this wiki you can see for yourself what
kind of math they use:
orbital, and total angular momentum
But if electrons are magnetic monopoles as I
am thinking, how can measuring via different axes lead to other
results? It makes no sense that a measurement via the x-axis gives
a different result compared to the y or z-axis.
Ok, with only a tiny amount of energy you can ram the electron
into a higher magnetic state but likely there is also a
conversation law at work that says total magnetic charge stays the
This is the math where they use to torture
the students for no reason at all:
But in practice how do you measure the spin
state of an electron?
The original Stern-Gerlach experiment used an inhomogeneous
magnetic field but if electrons are magnetic monopoles you can
also use any kind of bipolar magnetic field.
The Stern-Gerlach magnetic field was
vertical, but you can easily apply two magnetic fields at the same
time. The quadruple magnets below are used in linear
The two north poles are opposite just like
the two south poles (otherwise it would not be a quadruple
Because the two equal magnets are placed
opposite, elementary logic says that the electrons now should go
in a straight line.
You can even drive this idea further: Take a
cube and place a magnetic pole in each of the 8 corners and ensure
the opposite corners always have the same magnetic field pointing
inwards. Also ensure that going from corner to corner you always
alternate between magnetic fields. If a beam of electrons goes
through the midpoint of the cube always entering the cube
perpendicular, it should travel in a straight line...
By the way my dear physics professors, why
are these quadruple magnets used anyway in linear accelerators?
That is to keep the electrons in sharp focused beams...
So every time one of you physics folks is
telling the students:
For some strange reason nature does not allow us to measure spin
in more than one direction, at that very moment in thousands of
hospitals round the world constantly electrons are measured in two
ways to keep the beams sharp.
X-ray machines work with linear accelerators,
so if you even had a broken bone and the doctors needed an X-ray
photo, the machine uses the monopole properties of the electrons
to keep them nicely in their sharp focused beam.
That is what I had to say, the quadruple
picture is a part of a photo found here:
The phote was taken by John O'Neill.
End of this update, till updates.
(20 Oct 2015) In order to separate my
insights in math to those related to magnetism I am planning to
open a new html file on magnetism.
So beside the three main pages on higher
dimensional complex numbers, the new primer on magnetism will be
there and it starts with an update that gives 10 reasons as why
electrons are magnetic monopoles.
Item 1) Reason number nine: The way masers
Item 1) Reason number
nine: The way masers work.
You might think like what the fuck is a maser
but it is not for nothing this word rhymes like laser; the goal of
a maser is to resonate hydrogen atoms into changing the so called
'spin' of the lone electron orbiting the lone proton in the
Masers deliver the time in atomic clocks that
for example are found in the GPS system and equivalent space
programs from Europe.
Masers can only work if electrons are
magnetic monopoles, yet the folks of science have a bit of a
problem with that because they worship the Maxwell equations that
say magnetic monopoles do not exist.
So instead of a clear road explaining why
electrons are magnetic monopoles, at CERN and stuff they
burn taxpayer money to hunt stuff that validates the Maxwell
Just a short quote from a wiki about how
A weak static magnetic field is applied parallel to the cavity axis by a solenoid to separate the magnetic Zeeman sublevels.
Comment: The GPS system is loaded with atomic
clocks and all of these atomic clocks use masers because it has
this reliable frequency output.
Yet what the engineers of those atomic clocks
do not know; it is all based on electrons being magnetic
Relevant info: Hydrogen
End of this update, till updates.
(17 Oct 2015) Yesterday I was thinking why
electricity in for example a copper wire transports so fast while
the electrons themselves travel so slowly. The answer was
extremely simple: it must be electro-magnetic radiation between
But this update is about a fresh experimental
proof that electrons are the long sought magnetic monopoles.
Item 1) Research presented by IBM proofs
electrons are magnetic monopoles.
Item 1) Research
presented by IBM proves electrons are magnetic monopoles.
It is a relatively long Youtube video, about
70 minutes where I retrieve the screenshot from as shown below.
The picture in the screenshot is about 20.45 minutes into the vid.
The Spin on Electronics!
-Spintronics- The Nanoscience and Nanotech of Spin Currents | Stuart Parkin
This vid contains a lot of interesting stuff
like wandering magnetic domains when you put a current though a
nano wire but as a starter we look at the next picture where you
see those stacked materials with conducting separating
Now the result is simple to understand:
If all magnetic layers (just dipole
macroscopic magnets) point in the same direction, electrical
resistance is low. And if all magnets (the dipoles) are constantly
placed into the other direction like that stack in the middle, the
electrical resistance is much much higher.
This once more abundantly proves that
electrons are magnetic monopoles because if they were magnetic
dipoles no significant differences would be observed.
Once more: if an electron was a tiny dipole magnet, in that case
the forces on it's south and north pole would cancel out and large
macroscopic magnetic fields would not influence it in a meaningful
But all experiments in physics point not to a dipole magnetic
electron, they all point to the opposite namely that electrons are
The experiment is a bit more advanced: in the
middle stack if you apply strong magnetic fields, the electrical
resistance also disappears!
But ha ha ha, a strong outside magnetic field
if strong enough will ensure the barrier magnetic layers are
easily overcome. Simply said: the electrons that go through have a
strong backwind that helps them to overcome the hard parts.
The research shown in the vid looks a bit
outdated like it is 10 years old or so.
Why is there no vibrant new spectrum of discoveries?
That is because at IBM and all other physics institutions like
universities the people keep on thinking that electrons are
At the end of this update I would like to
thank IBM with these results. Those wandering magnetic domains
were truly an eye opener to me.
Till updates my dear reader, live well and
(15 Oct 2015) Just a nice so called 'artistic
interpretation' today of the Aurora Borealis & it's South Pole
variant. In a normal world I would be beating the shit out of the
Russians when it comes to the BUK stuff but we must never forget
that the Russians despite the gigantic size of their nation are
too stupid to even grow their own vegetables... (That is why we
exported so much of that stuff in the first place.)
Item 1) Why Mars died and Earth lived.
Item 1) Why Mars
died and Earth lived.
The solar wind is mostly made of loose
particles like loose protons and electrons and the occasional
helium nucleus. For a few years now I am investigating if these
kind of particles are magnetic monopoles yes or no.
All stuff found points to the simple
statement that all spin half particles are in fact the long sought
magnetic monopoles. Take for example a loose electron in the solar
wind, if it were true this is a magnetic dipole in that case it
would not be attracted by the earth North or South pole in any
But if an electron is a magnetic monopole,
the south pole version would be attracted to the earth North Pole.
And the north pole variant of the electron would naturally be attracted
to the earth South Pole.
The professional physics professors think for
some completely unfounded reason that electrons are magnetic
dipoles, they have zero point zero proof for that so it is more or
less like a religious dogma.
A religious dogma is what an axiom is in
mathematics or a so called postulate in quantum mechanics; it is
something you take for granted to be true and on top of that you
start building your theory.
For example, in math it is an axiom that for
two numbers a and b we have:
a + b = b + a
and we do not try to prove that this is
always true but we accept it as a basic fact of life: all numbers
should behave this way and if not it are no numbers or it is not
Now in the science of physics there is no
experiment that validates the electrons have a north and a south
pole from the magnetic point of view, it is just a dogma or a
postulate but there is zero point zero experimental
After having said that, think of the artistic
mind. You must create a beautiful picture and the physics people
do 'bla bla bla' but they have the money from the taxpayer.
So what do you do? Well the artist will craft
pictures like the next. Two different colors are used to paint the
way to the earth North & South pole. The physics professors
are glad because it looks good while the Maxwell equations are
still valid (magnetic monopoles do not exist say the Maxwell
equations). And this is how it looks, the artist uses two colors
to differentiate between the earth magnetic dipoles...
Source of this screenshot: Why Mars Died, and Earth Lived
Let's leave it with that because if so called
professional physics professors are to stupid to do thought
experiments on electrons being magnetic monopoles we should stop searching
for intelligent life in the universe and instead try to find
intelligent life on our own planet first. Till
(12 Oct 2015) A bit more on the CERN storing
device for storing anti matter hydrogen, first I show you a faulty
animation that could never work and after that I explain how I
would design such a device.
Item 1) All spin half particles are magnetic
Item 1) All spin half
particles are magnetic monopoles.
Ok, that British scientist known as Tara
Shears did not explain at all how such a trapper of anti hydrogen
would work in detail so I tried to look it up for myself.
Like said before: professional physics people
are highly schizophrenic when it comes to magnetic monopoles
because the prophets Maxwell and Gauss do forbid that kind of
Now because in practice you have to work with
particles that are magnetic monopoles, the professional physics
professors have found a way to stay inside the religion of
'official physics' why still tapping the properties of the
They call it spin and they are always extremely vague explaining
exactly what it is.
Often they start waiving their arms in the air stating 'quantum
mechanics is just soo hard to understand'.
With such statements they are right: If you
use the concept of spin it is assured that quantum mechanics is
hard to understand but if you use the magnetic monopole version of
particle physics it is much more digestible...
After having said that, here is a link to a
Youtubber explaining the technical details in trapping anti matter
like anti hydrogen:
ALPHA experiment animation
Here is a picture with two screenshots from
the Youtubber, it contains a gigantic fault because those circular
electrical magnets should be both sending in the same magnetic
stuff, let is be south pole or north pole magnetic stuff.
So the two electrical currents should never
run in the same direction, that would render the whole thing
Tech details: the octopole magnet uses about
700 Ampere currency and the two mirror coils about 700 Ampere. And
that my dear reader is in a device only about 14 cm between the
two mirror coils...
Now how would I design such a magnetic
I would much much more use a spherical design
where anti protons and anti electrons enter the sphere on opposite
I would use magnetic fields only, except for the difference in
magnetic monopole properties of protons and electrons (electrons
have easily about one thousand times more magnetic monopole stuff
compared to protons).
I would do stuff like releasing a thousand or a million particles
at a given time.
I would cover the sphere with a lot of small circular, may be
triangular shaped electrical magnets all pointing inwards the same
magnetic charge like north or south pole.
Etc etc, at CERN they are all overpaid so why
not let them figure out crucial details for themselves. After all
they are the ones that put a spin on it...
End of this update, till updates.
(08 Oct 2015) A scientist from the UK makes a
gigantic blunder showing that my insights on electrons and all
spin half particles are in fact the long sought magnetic
Item 1) Tara Shears: anti hydrogen is
electrical neutral at 45.50 in the vid.
Item 1) Tara Shears:
anti hydrogen is electrical neutral at 45.50 in the vid.
These physics professors are truly schizophrenic:
when they need the magnetic monopole properties of electrons and
positrons they come up with that crazy concept as spin and when
they explain the Maxwell equations suddenly magnetic monopoles
They are crazy to the bone.
What is the case? At CERN in the Swiss
landscape they are trying to make anti-matter atoms like for
example anti hydrogen. And they want to experiment on that. But if
you want to experiment on that you need to be able to store it and
that is the so called 'alpha experiment' where the anti hydrogen
atoms are stored in a bottle like shaped thing.
The entire documentary is almost 60 minutes
and definitely worth watching but we only need the stuff at minute
45.50 and a few seconds more where Tara Shears says:
Storing anti hydrogen is very
difficult because it is electrically neutral so you cannot apply
electrical fields to contain it. But the alpha experiment has some
very clever magnetic bottle and they tap into the spin magnetic
properties of the anti matter hydrogen...
Stuff like that makes my pants fall down
because Tare does not explain in any way how this bottle works, so
I will do that but first you can check the stuff yourself:
Tara Shears - Antimatter: Why the anti-world matters
Now how does this bottle do it's job
containing the mysterious anti hydrogen atoms in check while these
atoms are electrically neutral?
That is because magnetically speaking they
are not neutral and bottle like structures like this are the same
as a very old attempt to make a magnetic monopole from square
The idea is as next:
Coils producing bipolar magnetic fields are
often circular but you can also making them like squares so you
get square coils.
Take six of these square coils and put them into a cube shaped
form with all magnetic south poles pointing into the cube. (Now
you can trap a magnetic south pole in the middle of the cube, in
order to trap a magnetic north pole just change the direction of
the electrical current in the coils.)
Basically now you have an electrical magnetic
monopole because this configuration only sends out north pole
magnetic field into the world and all south pole magnetic field is
This is basically how the CERN magnetic
bottle must work, and it is not for nothing people like Tara
Shears do not explain this kind of physics to a wider
You can make a bottle shaped thing like this
with lots of tiny electrical magnets with all pointing the same
magnetic charge inside the bottle, let it be the north pole
magnetic charge or the south pole magnetic charge.
End of this update, till updates.
(07 Oct 2015) It would be tempting to discuss
the Nobel prizes from today & yesterday but I refrain from
that because in the previous update I estimated my own probability
of ever getting such stuff as 0.0% for the rest of my life.
That is not completely caused by the
stupidity of the 'professional professors', it is also my own
choice of avoiding all contacts with people who are overpaid in
the first place.
So we will be doing that what brings joy to
the heart: Discussing a book with the title 'Complex Numbers the
Higher Dimensional Forms' from the author Dennis Morris.
Item 1) A wiki on split complex numbers.
Item 1) A wiki on
split complex numbers.
First let me bring praise to Dennis Morris
who tried to explain higher dimensional complex numbers to a wider
audience. On a scale of 1 to 10 I rank the contribution of Dennis
That is a high ranking, what is the
motivation for this level of ranking?
1) Dennis is more or less from the physics
side of science, he is clearly much much better than all these
thousands and thousands of worthless math professors.
2) The book is very transparent to read, for
me this is very important because so much of the 'professional
math professors' hide behind difficult schemes that are hard to
3) At my present age I could never write such
a book, so it is good Dennis throws a second edition at it. (The
first edition sold only 500 copies demonstrating abundantly how
stupid professional math professors are when it comes to new
After having said that I strongly advice
buying the book of Dennis because at Amazon it is only 20$ or so.
Of course there is also the thing known as shipping fee and after
34€ and a few weeks of waiting I finally did have the book in my
This the Amazon link, if you are interested
you should buy it:
Complex Numbers The Higher Dimensional Forms - 2nd Edition: Spinor Algebra 2nd Edition
Now without insulting Dennis, the book has
the math depth of a bird bath; you will find nothing of the stuff
I wrote down all those years. But for 'professional math
professors' it is a very good starter.
After having said that, on page 38 of the
book that Dennis wrote we observe a nice historical overview of
how generalizations of complex numbers evolved over the centuries.
There has been not much progress, for example in something known
as 'split complex numbers' from the year 1997 it is riddled with
deep fundamental flaws.
Here is the wiki on split complex
One thing is clear: THE HUMAN MIND IS NOT
CAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING higher dimensional complex numbers
because for example in this wiki we have the next devastating
stupid definition of a conjugate:
So if humans produce weird math when it comes
to two dimensional numbers, can we trust the Nobel committee for
bringing forward those folks that drive science?
Let's leave it with that. Till updates.
(05 Oct 2015) In the last update I made a
small mistake at the end; this update corrects this small mistake.
Item 1) A simple electron spin state
Item 1) A simple
electron spin state separator.
The basis of this simple spin separator is
the idea that electrons are the long sought monopoles, if an
electrical current goes though a permanent magnet the magnetic
electron monopoles easy more easy from the north pole than from
Therefore in the picture below S is the
sender and is a permanent magnet (or an electrical one or it is
the kernel of an electrical magnet), the red arrows represent a
north pole and blue a south pole.
Small arrow represent the magnetic monopole electrons.
I made a drawing mistake; D is the drain that
attracts the electrons should be cut in half to separate the two
kinds of electrons. The wires I and II now mostly contain monopole
north electrons respectively monopole south electrons.
In the picture from the previous update we
observed a difference of 10 Ohm versus 100 Ohm depending on what
kind of electrons were send out; therefore we must not expect 100%
purity in our simple electron separator but more like a 90/10
ratio between the two magnetic states.
Repeating the process a few times will jack
up the purity.
Now I combined the wires I and II again, yet
in the science of spintronics this should not be done but the
electrons with a desired state should be used in nano devices
where a particular kind of electron spin (read magnetic monopole)
Ok, tomorrow is the announcement of the Nobel
prize in physics. Now in a normal unbiased world a paradigm change
from electron being magnetic dipoles with 'intrinsic spin' to the
more realistic view of electrons being magnetic monopoles could
lead to a Noble prize.
There is just one little problem: The people
from the universities are the ones who do the pre-selection of
So that is the end of the story; tomorrow I
will have 0.0% chance just like all other years of my future
I said it before: The university people are
so full of shit that if you measure the content of shit before and
after a toilet visit, no significant difference is measured.
Yet I too will be watching with interest
tomorrow because it is always good stuff.
I will not deny that. Till updates my dear reader.
(02 Oct 2015) Two items; the first one is
about insulin levels in the brains of people with a type of
dementia known as Alzheimer (this is appendix 2 on the series of
The second item is electron spin in nano-scale
structures like and electron valve, we wonder how a magnetic
dipole can make that work and as usual we arrive at the conclusion
that electrons are magnetic monopoles.
Item 1) What does an elevated insulin level
do in the brain?
Item 2) Nano devices like an electron valve & electron
Item 1) What does an
elevated insulin level do in the brain?
In this item I show you a graph of elevated
insulin levels, but this graph is related to the insulin levels in
stuff like muscle. I could never find a picture saying the same
thing for the brains of people with dementia and that is not very
surprising because such measurements are likely damaging to the
Now I think that the damage done to brains
with dementia is simply the lack of energy they can put in from
the sugar in the blood. Like said before; because of the high
insulin levels the body of such people always is in sugar
(glucose) burning mode and never in fat burning mode. And never switching
between the modes makes the problems worse and worse.
So a person with Alzheimer has elevated
insulin in the brain, in the morning they wake up and the nurses
or their family members will ensure they eat a few slices of bread
and that is enough for another day without access to energy:
The insulin resistance ensures insulin levels
stay so high the fat burning mode never sets in during the day
while at the time the insulin resistance ensures no glucose can be
burned either. The food is killing the brain day by day...
Again; this is likely muscle insulin levels,
you see on inspection that the lows of the high insulin levels are
the highs of the normal insulin levels:
Source of the picture: Why Are Fat People Hungry?
By the way; the guy that maintains this
butter & pants falling down website has lost 150 pounds. That
is worth an applause, yet once you understand how your body reacts
on weird foods like grain and sugar it is rather easy.
Now if someone with dementia goes on a
different diet it might be too late; the building up of plagues
and stuff in Alzheimer can take up to two decades before the end
phase is there. During these decades you should eat regularly such
that the fat burning can take place (I think but have no proof for
it that during the fat burning periods the insulin resistant cells
shed their intracellular lipid and as such become normal again and
energy intake is restored again).
So far appendix two to the seven dementia
Item 2) Nano devices like
an electron valve & electron spin.
My list of things explaining that electrons
are in fact magnetic monopoles is still growing. From the way the
Aurora Borealis, the northern light, forms by the magnetic
monopoles being sucked to the earth magnetic North Pole to the
electron pairs in chemical bounds, all points to electrons as
Now people that work at universities and
academia know that according to the rules of James Clerk Maxwell
& Gauss no magnetic monopoles exist. Therefore they do all
kinds of weird stuff to avoid the word 'monopoles' and now
constantly the electrons have 'intrinsic spin' that is pointing up
Or they color the electrons red and blue.
But magnetic fields can go in any direction, it is nonsense to
talk about spin up or down because that only relates to the
application of a vertical magnetic field...
May be it is wise to look at the Youtubber
first because there the electron valve is explained; it is a
non-magnetic middle and there is a Send and Drain part and they
are covered by either 2 north poles, 2 south poles or 1 north
& 1 south pole.
And they start wondering why in some cases
the electrical resistance is so low and in other cases it is so
high. But understanding the magnetic monopole nature of electrons
makes it so easy; a north magnetic monopole electron will get
repelled by a north pole sender or north pole drain.
But a monopole south electron gets attracted by a north sender
side, hence there will be much more electrical resistance or to
put it otherways: you need a higher potential to send the electron
from sender to drain.
nanoHUB-U Fundamentals of Nanoelectronics I: M4.1 The "Spinning" Electron - Spin Valve
Here is a screen shot, it is a bit vague but
the upper left shows that the red and blue path both have a
resistance of 10 Ohm so the replacement resistance is 5
The important thing to ask is: Can such a
device work this way if electrons were in fact magnetic dipoles as
the professional physics professors always claim?
Of course not, if electrons were magnetic
dipoles there would never be any difference in resistance. Because
in such a small magnetic dipole like an electron, all magnetic
forces would cancel out. We observe experiment in experiment out
that these forces do not cancel out, hence electrons must be
(By the way: do you notice with some minor
modifications this small thing
acts also as a state separator?)
This nano device makes my pants fall down...
Ok, let's leave it with that. Till updates.
(28 Sept 2015) Why not put my math works into
After all, when for example we humans compare our body weight to
the weight of our planet, we are humbled by the total mass of the
In this small update we are doing the same
with the complex numbers from the professional math professors
over the last centuries.
Item 1) A bit of historical perspective.
Item 1) A bit of
It is well known that sir Hamilton devoted a
tremendous amount of time and effort to find the three dimensional
complex numbers. After many years of trying he found the so called
quaternions and those are still in use today.
Well actually Hamilton did a little bit more
than this; it is not for nothing that the energy operator is
called the Hamiltonian operator. The most fundamental equation in
quantum physics contains this Hamilton energy operator. These form
an integral part of the most basis stuff of quantum
Yet the Hamilton guy could not find the 3D
I did find them on some Sunday afternoon back
in the year 1990, but the math professors from the local
university were just fucking stupid and never grasped what I
More perspective: There are about 100
thousand math professionals out there. This is a rough estimate,
likely it is much higher because what is a 'math professional'
Now if you are a 'real pro' you like to
attack the hard problems around. And as such all those
professional people must have thought about the open problems out
there. For example if they are true pro's they would like to try
and find 3D complex numbers and study why they failed on their journey.
Well non of the present math professors did
find the 3D complex numbers and that also goes for the latest 150
years of non-performers after Hamilton arrived at the scene.
My problem with all those universities is
very simple at the bottom:
A high IQ math professor would always try to
find 3D complex numbers because it is important to understand
where it all goes wrong...
Yet century in century out there is zero
point zero progress.
Let's leave it with that, till updates.
(25 Sept 2015) A small update on electron
spin resonance and what this learns us for building quantum
computers based on electron spin states.
Item 1) Electron spin resonance & quantum
Item 1) Electron
spin resonance & quantum computing.
Electron spin resonance or ESP should not be
confused with those medical MRI scans where the nucleus of the
atom is brought into resonance. ESP focuses on resonating the
unpaired electrons in an atom.
Once more: unpaired electrons are the
magnetic monopoles that the professional physics professors seek
for so long and inside the framework of ESP this can be validated
with are simple thought experiment:
Begin thought experiment:
Suppose the professional physics professors
are correct and indeed electrons are magnetic dipoles and not
magnetic monopoles. Now we stick two electrons on top of each
other and that is known as an electron pair, this pair is the
basic building block in sciences like the chemical sciences.
Now if you put two magnetic dipoles on top of
each other, you get another magnetic dipole and as such under the
are of electron spin resonance you should get the same results if
you resonate a loose electron or a pair of electrons.
End of the thought experiment.
In practice the electron pair is neutral to
electron spin resonance while the loose or unpaired electron
reacts wildly. Hence this behavior can only be explained by the
simple fact that electrons are magnetic monopoles.
Ok, after my ritual ramming against standard
stupid wisdom like 'magnetic monopoles do not exist' let's dive a
bit deeper into the consequences as I see it for quantum
Professional physics professors instantly
understand the next picture:
A magnetic field is applied on loose
electrons and perpendicular to that we have electro-magnetic
fields that bring the resonating energy to the loose
It is well known inside physics that the
strength of the applied magnetic field is proportional to the
difference in energy levels the electrons have when it comes to
charging or discharging their magnetic monopole stuff.
Source of this screenshot:
spin resonance http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3cmvQc8xxU
You might wonder as what this has to do with
After my humble opinion since in a quantum
computer everything in the initial position has to be in some kind
of superposition over the diverse quantum states, all admissible quantum states have to be of the same energy level.
If not, measuring quantum states gives rise
to different energy levels violating the principle of energy
To put it simple: A quantum computer that
works basically on electrons must have zero magnetic fields inside
(and also zero electrical fields inside) because only the tiniest
amount of pure magnetic field destroys the capability of forming
End of this small update, till
(21 Sept 2015) Oh oh, what happens if you do
a Google search for the next phrase:
3D complex numbers do not exist
Although I was searching for lunatics
explaining why they do not exist, to my amazement a link was there
to my own website related to 5D complex numbers.
So that is our item of today:
Item 1) Why is Google linking to a hardcore
result from 30 Jan 2014???
Item 1) Why is Google
linking to a hardcore result from 30 Jan 2014???
I was only looking for idiot remarks from
weird people explaining why complex numbers can only be two
dimensional. Weirdly enough my own writings pop up on page 1 in a
standard Google search if you search for:
3D complex numbers do not exist
This is strange because if you look for only
'3D complex numbers' I am too lazy to click so far as to find this
very webpage but with 'do not exist' I pop up on page 1...
Anyway I do not waste much time upon my own
rankings, the fact about 100% of math professionals cannot find
higher dimensional complex numbers for themselves makes such
rankings completely irrelevant. But a few times a year I conduct
such experiments, it is always a waste of time.
Yesterday when I performed the search for the
first time I was on page 2, here is a screen shot of that:
So I pondered the question why the hell
Google relates to this math hardcore update and not to other more
relevant stuff that is less hardcore???
Therefore I did read again my own math update
from 30 Jan 2014 and may be the form of writing it triggered
people to return much more because a lot of the basic things are
Furthermore the actual update might be only
10 pages, most other math profs needs about 20 to 50 pages to say
the same content.
On top of that, this update contains a big
amount of math and once you understand it you are a different
All in all this is a strange Google finding
and all in all rankings are not important so I will not update on
future rankings or so. Till updates.
(18 Sept 2015) Two items:
Item 1) A short overview of one decade of
research into dementia.
Item 2) Can a beam of electrons being split into three?
Item 1) A short
overview of one decade of research into dementia.
This week I took the time and viewed a few
long documentaries about the research into dementia the last
decade. I did that because in the year 2005 it was found by that
female researcher that her mice could develop Alzheimer when given
a high fat diet (and of course the grains that mice are fond
I have to say this was a sobering experience;
no fundamental research whatspoever. A naive person might expect
that if the brain has indeed insulin resistance you would focus on
that because this is the basic mechanism that causes the lack of
energy to the brain what causes all the rest.
It is as simple as it is.
Now do the people of the universities do
this? The answer is no, no, no, no and much more no no no. As
usual they complain about a lack of money and most of the stuff
they do is concentrated on the deposits of amyloidal deposit
between the neurons and that tau deposit inside the neurons.
Although these deposits are of course highly
damaging, they are only a symptom because in a healthy brain these
deposits are absent...
For example from the Stanford university: The Latest on Alzheimer's Disease Research
From the University of California Television:
Biology of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias
Once more we observe how the universities do
their business: They only wonder what the colleagues would think
about it. In one of the documentaries it was even said there were
two camps; the one camp thought it was the amyloid deposit and the
other camp thought the tau stuff was the root cause of all
You see whatever science it is, if you have a
deep problem to solve;
DO NEVER GO TO A UNIVERSITY FOR HELP.
These people are only preoccupied with their place in the rankings
and deeper as that it will never ever go. Whatever branch of
science it is, they are all pseudo scientists by definition.
I mean, how hard can it be? The next link is
a wiki on Insulin resistance and what is symptom number 1? It is
Item 2) Can a beam of
electrons being split into three?
Under the assumption that electrons are
magnetic monopoles and as such electron pairs are the smallest
possible magnetic dipoles, with a modified version of an old
fashioned cyclotron it could be possible to split an electron beam
into three separate beams.
This is how an old fashioned cyclotron looks,
the electrons go from the cathode to the anode and because they
are in a magnetic field they go around in a circle:
The magnetic field is perpendicular to the
'plane' where the electrons move and already you see the electrons
separating away from the plane towards the magnetic poles...
Now my idea was to make two
Mod 1) Make the electron receiving anode
broader, say a beam of metal 20 cm wide.
With a bit of luck this will give three
One beam of pure north magnetic monopoles;
A beam in the middle consisting of electron pairs &
Beam number three of only south magnetic monopoles.
If there is no middle beam, it might be wise
to take the cathode outside the homogenous magnetic field, so via
a cylinder from outside feed them into the magnetic field, so the
electrons could form pairs if they found the love of their
End of this update; so all dementia research
is only into the symptoms while on the magnetic monopole front
this nice experiment could give three electron beams.
(15 Sept 2015) More incoherent ramblings on
electron spin, this time I have selected a video from MIT. The
reason I choose MIT is because they have a giant reputation.
Item 1) Incoherent ramblings from MIT upon
Item 1) Incoherent
ramblings from MIT upon electron spin.
Somewhere in the seventh minute this
professional physics professor explains as why in the Stern
Gerlach experiment a loose hydrogen atom gets separated into two
beams and he explains this via precession of the electron going
around the proton.
At first this looks very convincing, tiny
problem is that in the original S-G experiment they used ionized
silver. Only later the experiment was done with atomic hyudrogen
and the effects were there but very small.
So how is it possible that Stern &
Gerlach could separate a stream of silver ions while lots of
electrons could go around the nucleus?
It is just not possible, only if electrons
are magnetic monopoles it can be explained that an entire silver
ion moves against the direction of the stronger magnetic field.
It gets repelled, that is what you must think about when thinking
about these kind of experiments... It's getting repelled, how to
explain that away?
Click on the picture for the 12.26 min
Youtubber with the title:
6-2 Spin and the multielectron atom: electron spin
There is just so much completely wrong with
this explanation; not only were silver ions used, this
'professional' professor uses the analogy of an electron spinning
around a proton but ha ha ha in all atomic clocks they use the
same system to separate electrons into those with 'spin up' and
But in the atomic clocks these electrons are
not spinning around a proton, they just come from an electron
cannon. In that case the 'professionals' are talking about the
electron spinning around it's axis but in order to explain the
observed data the electrons must be spinning much faster than the
speed of light.
One way or the other, all this nonsense from
the universities cannot explain what we observe. But if you say;
Hey dude the electron is an electric monopole and also a magnetic
monopole and as such is capable of receiving and sending so called
'electro-magnetic' radiation, in that case you can explain all
these observed phenomena.
End of this update, till updates.
(11 Sept 2015) A short update on electron
spin because not only the professional professors from physics
talk rambling incoherent stuff, the science known as chemistry is
in the same state of mind.
Item 1) Electrons are magnetic monopoles.
Item 1) Electrons are
There are many ways to find experimental
evidence for this statement but the most important was done in the
famous Stern-Gerlach experiment where ionized silver atoms went
through an inhomogenous magnetic field and guess what?
The beam was split in half.
This is only logical if electrons are
magnetic monopoles and if you use this idea to view all the
diverse physical things out there it always makes sense.
Long before the discovery of the electron it was Gauss who
declared that all magnetism must be dipole in nature. In the times
of Gauss this was logical because every time they did split a
magnet they were left with a dipole magnet and they simply could
not divide the magnet down to one electron and a loose
Now professional physics professors always
argue that they are a science and everything is founded in
experimental proof. Yet for their pipedream as electrons being
magnetic dipoles, no such experimental evidence has ever been
You have all this bla bla bla from those
professors but I am also listening to 23 years of bla bla bla from
my own science math; these weirdo's think complex numbers are only
there in the two dimensional form. These people clearly have
mental issues like mild cognitive impairment or a leaky blood
Anyway the reason for this update is to show
you the next picture because it is very strange that the people
from chemistry come up with models of atoms and molecules like
this while at the same time they too think electrons are magnetic
The red & blue things model the electron pairs in an atom:
The red an blue spots are, as far as I know
reality, the same; the different colors are only there to bring
more contrast in the picture. Every red and blue spot represents
an electron pair, you see they never overlap and this is logical
because each electron pair more or less consume their own magnetic
stuff while the electrical charge prevents them from forming
Therefore electrons being magnetic monopoles
is at the very heart of the science of chemistry; only the
monopole nature of electrons explains the way molecules and atoms
react the way they do.
But there are so many ways to show that
electrons are magnetic monopoles, take for example one of these
pairs above. If such a pair was made of two magnetic dipoles there
would be no reason to observe also electron triples or whatever
number of magnetic dipoles attached to each other...
It is safe to conclude that the triplet of
sciences; math, physics and chemistry do not understand their own
fundamentals at all.
Source of the picture: Chemistry Lesson - 9 - Quantum Mechanical Model
Till updates & do not forget to put a
spin on your life.
(06 Sept 2015) Two days ago in the math files
around higher dimensional complex numbers I did hang in a short
update on the geometric series in 3D space.
That is our item for today:
Item 1) Teaser picture for the update on the
Item 1) Teaser
picture for the update on the geometric series.
My goal was to write some short stuff that
could be used in the second year of an academic study in math. So
I had to keep it simple and I wanted it to be short.
Therefore I selected the well known geometric
series because everybody knows that thing. To be honest I was
pleased I did make this choice because the geometric series also
has a very simple so called functional equation coming with
And functional equations are notoriously hard
to understand, think for example the most famous open problem out
there; the Riemann conjecture on the zero's of the zeta function.
Now the zeta function also abides a functional equation but most
people feel like they need to vomit in trying to understand that
Luckily my functional equation is far more
simple & easy to understand.
Read the latest update in the higher dimensional complex numbers
by clicking on the picture below.
Further reading: Geometric
(Remark: All my browsers return a https link,
by now it looks like https works just as good as http but if it
does not work on your computer try the http version of
(03 Sept 2015) Correction: on 30 August I
wrote that the Dutch government will spend about 100 million €
on research into quantum computers, it seems to be a little bit
more like 135 M€.
In the meantime it was in the news that Intel
pumps 50 M$ into a spin-off company of the Delft university over
the next decade in order to help with making the first workable
For myself speaking I am very much in favor
of studying how computers can tap quantum effects much more, but I
still have a giant doubt about that 'faster than light'
communication stuff that is out there in the scientific
Therefore I have decided to tell you what I
do not understand at all about superposition of let's say
electrons. Is it really true that a single electron can be in two
quantum states at the same time?
Item 1) Can a single electron be in more than
one quantum stage at any given time?
Item 1) Can a single
electron be in more than one quantum stage at any given time?
You know that classical physics has those
fundamental laws like the law of conservation of energy. Now if I
understand the quantum stuff correctly, professional physics
professors say that different spin states of the single electron
has different energy levels related to them because of some
'exclusion principle' from a guy named Pauli.
Well, that is very interesting. Because how
can an electron be in a superposition of states when if you
measure the spin state where does the energy go?
How can a quantum particle be in a
superposition of quantum states with all different energy
I have my own views on this kind of stuff,
for the time being I stay on the Einstein side of things:
information cannot travel faster than c.
Link (added on 04 Sept):
Intel invests $50m in the Delft University of Technology to advance quantum computing
If quantum computers will arise is another
thing. End of this update.
(30 Aug 2015) The Dutch government is
planning to spend about 100 million € for the next decade to put
together an university department for crafting quantum computers.
That is fine, after all 100 million is just a
few Euro's per capita citizen, but quantum computers can only work
if professional physics professors understand the nature of
quantum particles like electrons.
If stuff pans out right we could, for
example, have faster than light communications...
Item 1) The Delft folks do the Mr. Bell
experiment at 1280 meter.
Item 1) The Delft
folks do the Mr. Bell experiment at 1280 meter.
In Delft they succeeded into separating
quantum particles from a so called entangled state and bringing
them 1280 meters apart. If the spin state of one of the electrons
was measured, the spin state of the other electron was instantly
known despite the distance of 1280 meters...
For the average person interested in quantum
stuff, source Scientific American:
Quantum "Spookiness" Passes Toughest Test Yet
On the preprint archive we have a pdf file
that is far more hard to swallow:
Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km
This more of less validates that entangled
wave functions stay entangled even after spatial separation. So
was Einstein wrong?
But what do we know about the electron
I think all spin half particles are magnetic
monopoles but in a electron pair it could just be that the
electrons are constantly exchanging the magnetic charge they
If so, there must constantly be a photon
hanging around with a wavelength of about 21 cm to transport the
energy needed to do the exchange of magnetic charge.
So if the Delft folks measure the stuff at
place A, it is assured that in place B it will be opposite. No
information has traveled in between because the loose electrons
were still in their old resonating wave function...
End of this update.
(26 Aug 2015) Two items for today: I did
forget in the last dementia update to point at all those
amputations we have in obese people. That is also from dying
The second item is about electrons being
magnetic monopoles and in a Youtubber you can see all the idiotic
professional physics professors make from magnetic
Item 1) Appendix 1 on the last dementia
update number seven.
Item 2) A Nottingham professor on electron magnetic
Item 1) Appendix 1 on
the last dementia update number seven.
All these obese people have elevated risks of
amputation of the lower limbs like a foot or half of a leg. Now
why is that?
Very simple: the pain nerves do not work any
And if they step into something that wounds
one of the feet, they do not feel it.
And if they do not feel it, they keep on walking and as such the
original wound cannot heal, the problem spreads and all that can
be done is an amputation of the lower limbs.
But if you cannot feel pain from your feet
any longer, what the fuck is happening?
The pain registering nerve has died...
And the nerve died because it was no longer
able to retrieve energy from the glucose in the obese body... It
is as simple as it is: constantly burning glucose and never ever
burn body fat, it will kill you in ways you cannot
Item 2) A Nottingham
professor on electron magnetic spin.
In the UK city of Nottingham they have a
university and they spread out lots of video's of their research.
That is a good thing, in my home country all the universities do
is suck in a gigantic boatload of money and perform like shit
decade in decade out.
Now in my view electrons are magnetic
monopoles because for example in the science of chemistry we only
observe electron pairs. If electrons were magnetic dipoles this
would not be observed...
Let's leave it with that, here is the weird
reporting on how electrons are magnetic dipoles but have
'intrinsic spin' anyway according to Nottingham professional
physics professors, at 3:49 seconds into the vid we have this
It was about 1.5 years ago in the winter
season when I thought out that electrons were the basic magnetic
monopole vehicle. Yet year in year out the people from the
universities are burning tax payer money and deliver only shitty
(Although if you dive into the publishing
detail, this video was done 3 years back.)
Let's leave it with that. Till
(23 Aug 2015) This is update nr seven on
dementia where we view dementia illnesses like Alzheimer as a
problem with the energy intake of the human brain.
This energy deficit is probably caused by resistance against
insulin so the brain cells cannot burn on glucose, they can also
not burn on ketones that are made by the liver from all kinds of
fat like body fat or dietary fat.
So the sugar laden diet is such that we literally
are eating ourselves dementia and Alzheimer and so...
Item 1) For the time being is this the last
update on dementia.
Item 1) For the time
being is this the last update on dementia.
Disclaimer: This stuff is no math, in the
first place I have no education in medicine whatsoever not even in
middle school biology. Yet at the end of my life as a bread eating
person, via the vehicle of inflammation the gluten came out of the
skin of my legs out;
It was always a small blub of white blood cells but there was
always a small grain in it.
I collected a few of these grains and put
them under the microscope; I recognized the stuff as gluten.
Gluten is an important ingredient of bread and all wheat based
foods and the problem with gluten is that your body cannot digest
Once inside the body, stuff that cannot be
digested at all will cause problems for your body one way or the
other. But it can take a long long time; at the end of my 50-th
year I finally developed gluten allergy.
All in all I am glad I developed it because
this simply forced me to stop eating bread and after I stopped
eating that shit a tremendous amount of positive things
Now always when there is talk about gluten
you have these people writing and talking about celiac disease;
and they say that only 1% of the population has it and that the
remaining 99% can safely eat bread because they are not allergic
& bla bla bla.
If you read that you instantly know you are
dealing with an idiot; bread causes a wide spectrum of illnesses.
Let me give you a few examples from my life that those idiots will
1) Better vision of the color blue at day
outside. There is more contrast between blue and the other colors.
Yet I easily passed all colorblind tests there are, but after
stopping bread the vision became better.
2) Better vision at night. In my garden shed
I have two lights, one big light with a switch and a small light
with a plug. Once or twice a night I try to use the small light,
in the past I often needed to first put on the big light so I
could push the plug in...
I never have to do that anymore because I have better night
3) Tooth chalk. During my entire life I
always had those deposits of tooth chalk. It is genetic said the
dentist, use a good anti tooth chalk tooth paste and you will be
My whole life I had deposits of tooth chalk on the skin in my
mouth, I stop eating bread and guess what? It is completely
I can easily make a list of 10 such things
but this is supposed to be about dementia in general and Alzheimer
in particular. Now the best information comes from Susan de la
Monte because about 10 years ago she was able to create Alzheimer
like stuff in standard laboratory mice from a standard
Now I love Susan because she came up with the
idea that Alzheimer is diabetes type 3 and that in can happen
independent of diabetes type 1 & 2. Furthermore, an important
eye opener is the new fact that the brain can make it's own
So independent of the rest of the body, if
your body is in sugar burning mode the human brain has it's own
regulation thing of more insulin in the brain yes or no.
This is important because brain tissue becomes insulin resistant
when there is fat stored inside the body cell of the brain tissue
and that only happens when insulin levels are too
But the human body on this crazy food is
always in sugar burning mode and never in fat burning mode, the
brain cannot burn glucose because too much brain tissue is insulin
resistant and it can not burn fat via the ketones because the body
is always in sugar burning mode...
It is as simple as it is.
Insulin is the most powerful hormone there
In males it lowers even testosterone if insulin levels are too
high and in females it lowers the estrogen hormone if insulin
levels are too high.
There are hundreds and hundreds of hormones in the human body, but
insulin is the most important hormone because if you do not
understand it, insulin will kill you slowly.
It is a difficult read for most people, if
has all that medical jargon in it and all those abbreviations like
AD or CNS but if you have some working brain left it is very wise
to try a few hours and read the stuff from Susan:
Alzheimer's Disease Is Type 3 Diabetes–Evidence Reviewed
At the end of the review there is a list of
abbreviations, for example:
AD = Alzheimer's Disease and
CNS = central nervous system.
Why they use all these abbreviations I don't
know, may be they want to keep the outsiders out and the insiders
Anyway although I like Susan a lot because of
her work, I completely disagree with the solution she arrives at.
Let me quote:
The findings that (1)
pronounced insulin/IGF deficiency and resistance develop early in
the course of AD; (2) insulin/IGF signaling abnormalities progress
with severity of neurodegeneration;5,10
and (3) an experimental animal model with features closely
mimicking the molecular, biochemical, and neuroanatomical
pathologies of AD could be generated by intracerebral delivery of
a drug that causes T1DM or T2DM led us to test the hypothesis that
AD-type neurodegeneration and cognitive could be reduced or
prevented by early treatment with insulin-sensitizer antidiabetes
agents such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)
Comment: In my view the problems are caused
by the fact the body is always in a sugar burning mode and never
in a fat burning mode. Therefore the sugar eating people will only
get more and more fat in the strangest of places like for example
Medicine that make the body more sensitive to insulin is nonsense,
if you give your body the opportunity for burn the fat rather
likely the dementia problems will never arise in the first
Also in this last update I want to repost the
picture where you roughly can understand how insulin levels rise
and fall in the human body:
For every person this will be different &
If you age it will be different &
Inside each food group the different foods will act
But grosso modo you can say that eating
carbonhydrates raise the blood sugar levels so fast that after
eating that stuff your body just cannot lower the insulin
And so for a long time you cannot burn fat
and if you eat three meals a day with that stuff you never ever
burn any fat on any given day.
And that my dear reader explains why there
are so many people with so many unwanted fat rolls, fat bellies,
fat this and fat that.
(16 Aug 2015) This is update nr 6 on dementia
and it is one of the last updates.
I have arrived at the conclusion that seriously fighting dementia
in, for example, the Dutch population, you also need the help of
people from the universities.
Well it is widely documented on this website
how the people from universities behave: we the society are there
to server them with boatloads of money and all they are is a bunch
of suckers. Incompetent to the bone decade in decade out.
Item 1) The ketogenic diet.
Item 1) The ketogenic
During the last half year I screwed together
the way I need to eat in order to be healthy and have a stable
body weight. No jojo stuff for me.
By comparison; in the UK people that lost
about the same amount of body weight as I did is about 1 in 210
persons. Think about it: only 1 in 210 can loose as much body
weight as I did.
The other 209 all started to do the jojo thing...
But if only 1 in 200 males of my age group
succeed in going back to a healthy weight, on a very deep level in
our societies we understand next to nothing about food.
So it is just like the math professors with their complex numbers
and physics professors with their magnetic monopoles... They too
do not understand the basics of their own profession.
Now the way I screwed together how I must eat
looks a lot like the so called ketogenic diet. I never heard of
this way of eating, only a few weeks ago I found it when
researching the ketone bodies.
What we have in common is that there is a
strong need to keep the levels of insulin low, that is why it is
called the ketogenic diet because low insulin guarantees there is
enough burning of fat.
When a person is diagnosed with some form of
dementia and after that this person goes on this keto diet, will
Compare that to being diagnosed as having
lung cancer and only after that you stop smoking cigarettes. Most
of the time it is too little too late.
Don't forget before people are diagnosed with dementia they first
must show the change in behavior, but the change in behavior is
the end station.
The way I view it now is that lack of energy
retrieved from glucose combined with far to high insulin levels in
the brain cause most of the trouble. Old people should not eat
food that jacks up the insulin... It is as simple as it is.
End of this update, just two links:
News You Can Use - Alzheimer's Disease and the Ketogenic Diet
Remark that although the medical doctor is on
the right track in the above video, he clearly has no clue about
the role of energy not going to the brain.
And from two years back:
Blood Levels of Insulin and Hemoglobin A1c in Foundation Members
Ok this one of the last updates on dementia,
so it is important to remark once more that as long as my Dutch
government promotes eating bread the levels of dementia will only
rise rise and rise given our demographic structure.
(14 Aug 2015) This is already update number 5
on dementia, the subset of Alzheimer within the dementia umbrella
and today I would like to throw in that eating food is also a
mathematical dynamical system.
Don't be scared, there are zero difficult
looking math formulas...
Item 1) Burning sugar and burning fat as a
Item 1) Burning sugar
and burning fat as a dynamical system.
As today's medical knowledge stands in the
year 2015 our human bodies have two ways of retrieving energy on
the cellular level:
1) Eat food, insulin levels rise and body
cells are opened to take in glucose from the blood.
2) Stop eating food, insulin levels decline
and body cells more and more use fat burning in the form of ketone
The dynamical system is very simple:
Suppose you are in state 2) and you have
stopped eating in order to let the fat burning process to do it's
After some time you get hungry so you prepare a meal and you eat
This meal forces the body to go into state 1) and glucose levels
rise while fat is no longer burned but stored.
Basically that is all there is to know about
food; use it properly and ensure that within the 24 hour time span
you visit both the sugar and fat burning side.
You might wonder WTF has this to do with
dementia or Alzheimer?
We are following the government advices and they say you must eat
bread and stuff every day and never skip breakfast???
Well only eating a few slices of bread and
your body cannot burn fat for many hours. How many hours is
dependent of many factors like for example do you ride 150
kilometer on a bike this day yes or no.
Your age is also important, I have zero reliable information on it
but the younger you are the faster your insulin levels decline. So
if you are young you sooner start burning fat again...
Elderly people that keep on eating bread and
other forms of sugar food never enter the fat burning cycle
anymore, more and more fat is also stored inside brain tissue and
brain cells so the glucose burning simple does not work any
At the same time the brain cannot burn fat
because insulin levels keep on being elevated. Hence your brain
has no energy and as such it will develop a wide spectrum that is
known as the dementia umbrella.
The name of this picture as stored on my PC
is 'Sugar burning does not work'.
The same goes for my Dutch government that
encourages eating bread on a daily basis, these people they are
weido's and luckily enough inside the families of political
leaders there is plenty of death related to dementia and or
Good luck with it my dear political
End of this update, till updates.
(11 Aug 2015) When I talk about elderly that
should avoid all food that raises your levels of insulin hormone,
there will always be lots of medical doctors that will sabotage
this just like the math professors try to sabotage the higher
dimensional complex number systems. In the next vid you can find
the classical fault when it comes to interpreting statistical
Item 1) Cause or just a correlation? Is
saturated fat bad?
Item 1) Cause or just
a correlation? Is saturated fat bad?
Your body can break down saturated fat so in
principle it is not poisonous or so.
Now a lot of medical doctors still think
consuming too much saturated fat is the basic cause of health
problems like Alzheimer, diabetes type 1 & 2 and cancer.
In the next Youtube vid an American medical
doctor talks about why saturated fat is causing Alzheimer. He is
wrong on the causation versus correlation thing:
It is the fact that most people are in
glucose burning mode that causes them to not being able to burn
fat. If you cannot burn fat you have to eat many meals a day.
If you cannot burn fat you only get fatter year in year out.
If you cannot burn fat you get insulin resistance that only makes
you more hungry...
And so on and so on; my hypothesis that
Alzheimer is caused by the fact the brain cannot get energy from
the food carves far more wood compared to this smooth talking
You can find the nonsense at 11.25 minutes,
Avoiding Alzheimer's - Neal Barnard MD
Now why are people eating so much saturated
fat on a much more higher risk compared to those who eat 13 grams
Well this way of using the amount of
saturated fat consumed is only a difficult way to measure how
obese a person is. Obese people eat a gigantic amount of food
because their bodies cannot digest it properly and of course obese
people are the ones destined for brain illnesses like
(But non obese people can get Alzheimer too,
if they eat bread on a daily basis it is like bye bye brains
forever. For example my grand mother was not obese but a daily
bread eater and she died from Alzheimer...)
Let's forget crap like this from this Neal
person and concentrate on Alzheimer being a sickness of the brain
caused by the lack of energy it can take in via glucose...
(09 Aug 2015) More and more the puzzle pieces
of dementia are falling into place: lately I found out that it was
classified as diabetes type 3 and that the brain became incapable
of retrieving energy from the glucose in your blood.
So let's dive into that.
Item 1) Strange places where fat is stored.
Item 1) Strange
places where fat is stored.
For reasons completely not understood, to
high sugar levels in the blood are toxic to the human body. Now
the medics have a very strange way to measure blood sugar levels;
they do it in milligram per deciliter of blood.
And the optimum is about 100 milligram per
deciliter, actually that is a way of saying exactly 1 gram per
liter of blood so at any given time you have about 5 gram of
glucose in your blood to give your cells energy when you are
in a sugar burning mode as induced by the hormone
Now if you eat weird food like bread or drink
the coca cola thing, blood sugar rises and this is dangerous for
unknown reasons but your body knows perfectly how to handle the
danger: create more fat from the excess sugar.
That is why you see such strange fat deposits
in people who follow the official guidelines for food, like for
example eating bread on a daily basis.
Excess fat on a macroscopic level is for
example the widening stomach, the rolls of fat over there, the
double chin, in females the cone shape of the upper legs.
There is also medium sized storage of smaller
deposits of fat, for example when I was a teenager I could sit
comfortably with my legs crossed over one another. When I was
about 25 years of age I was no longer comfortable to sit as such
longer then about 5 minutes. I was still slim but my legs had
excess fat storage.
By the way, that is the leg test: Can you sit
completely comfortable with your legs crossed for about 10
minutes? If not you have medium sized extra fat deposits.
The mini level of strange fat deposits are
the deposits inside the blood veins; that is relatively hard fat
that clogs the stream of blood. Remark this only happens if you
are constant in a sugar burning mode where you cannot burn
Here is a picture of macroscopic extra fat
Let's now look at some very strange fat
deposits on the microscopic level.
That is insulin resistance; your body is no
longer reacting to insulin so you cannot burn sugar and you feel
hungry all day long.
Insulin resistance is fat stored inside that
body cell, that fat blocks the hormone insulin and the result is
that this particular body cell cannot burn glucose any
This happens also in the brain of the
elderly; more and more the brain cannot burn glucose from the
bloodstream. But because of weird government propaganda our
elderly eat three meals a day and every meal has weird stuff like
bread or those polymerized sugars known as starch.
So because of the Dutch government propaganda
the Dutch elderly never can burn the fat and as such it gets
deposited everywhere on all kinds of weird places...
Thanks for your attention, till
Update from 10 Aug 2015: Here is a simplified picture of why I
always skip 18 hours between food intakes; if you want to burn fat
you must keep the insulin down.
But if I get hungry during these 18 hours I always eat something
and since I am in the 'fat burning mode' I guess my body is
telling me to eat some proteins like a baked egg or so... I
estimate about 1 in every 10 days I eat some protein during the
Anyway during the not eating period the
insulin levels are named fasting insulin, here is how they look
(again this is a simplification and for every person it might be a
little bit different but grosso modo this is how it looks):
(07 Aug 2015) It is no secret I am in the
anti sugar & anti wheat camp because that is best for my body.
But I am also a scientist and as such I should reason not from my
body only and draw conclusions for the entire population on
Item 1) The low carb high fat diet versus the
low fat high carb diet.
Item 1) The low carb
high fat diet versus the low fat high carb diet.
About one hundred days ago I stopped eating
during the daytime, I lost no weight and most days I go for about
18 hours without food while I ride my bide every day about 40 to
50 kilometers during the summer time.
You understand instantly: people that can go
without food for 18 hours every day, these people burn fat and
avoid carbon hydrates like bread, rice or potatoes.
If you want, you can also be a vegan, you
avoid all meat and animal fat and you eat lots of sweet fruit and
If you are a vegan you cannot go without food
for 18 hours every day so you are just like a cow in the grass
field eating all day long using your 3 or 5 different stomachs to
digest the food you eat.
Luckily there is some sugar in the fruit
because humans have only one stomach...
Anyway before we dive into the details of why
people get illnesses like Alzheimer and all those other brain
illnesses, it is important to understand the basics of food.
So I want to show you this picture because if
you are a fat burning person the hormone under the name insulin is
your enemy while if you are a vegan the hormone insulin is your
best friend forever...
This picture is only the glucose level,
insulin levels come down very slowly.
Of course graphs like these are averages,
everybody will react a little bit different to the food inputs
Basically it is very simple: If you are a
sugar burning person you should avoid fat and if your body prefers
burning fat you should avoid all sugars and on top of that most carbon hydrates.
Only if you do not follow this basic insight
you will develop long term illnesses like the Alzheimer brain that
Source of the picture: Reversing Type 2 diabetes starts with ignoring the guidelines
And here you can see a food fanatic pushing
his anti fat views on the entire population, it is obvious from
his reasoning that he seeks a 'one size fits all' solution.
Greger, MD discusses diabetes and the dangers of low carb diets
Have a good time digesting this simple insight,
(05 Aug 2015) It would be tempting to post
more about the development of the spectrum of Alzheimer illnesses
but given the fact my own Dutch government promotes eating bread
every day, I refrain from that.
It is important to lay the responsibility for
all those Alzheimer death and suffering at the feet of those
people that promote eating bread.
After having said that, this update has the
last teaser picture for the missing equations. It is appendix
number three, it is nine pages long and it is math hardcore nine
Item 1) I am missing equations so I went to
the lost & found department.
Item 1) I am missing
equations so I went to the lost & found department.
Appendix number three contains only 2 small
screen shots but it is math hardcore as hard as I can make it for
a wider audience.
I think that over 90% of those overpaid math
professors are too stupid to understand it, after all we are still
in year number four of complete silence when it comes to the
higher dimensional complex numbers.
And four years of silence is a strong
indicator of stupidity.
Anyway to make some story short, here is the
last teaser picture and very likely the next math update is
something much more easy to digest:
The geometric series in higher
dimensions... Click on the picture to land at the third
appendix, all in all this update was 37 pages long and as such the
End of this update, till updates.
(02 Aug 2015) In this update I want to
explain the main mechanisms behind the development and progression
of dementia or the illness of Alzheimer.
I only miss the proof of a small detail; how
is it possible that nitrates can cross the blood-brain barrier? I
think it is gluten in the bread that makes this possible but once
more: I do not have proof for that detail.
But since stuff passes the brain-blood
barrier we know it happens anyway...
Item 1) Glucose, ketone bodies and dementia
in the human brain.
Item 1) Glucose,
ketone bodies and dementia in the human brain.
The main cause for the progression of this
illness is a shortage of energy available for the brain tissue.
Now how does the human body get the energy from?
1) Glucose, all food like hydro carbonates is
turned into glucose. The body releases the hormone insulin and
that makes you body cells open to the glucose.
If you develop tolerance to insulin your body starts producing
more and more insulin, you will always feel hungry and overeat as
2) If levels of insulin are low enough you
burn on body fat or the fats out of food and this is done via
ketone bodies. You can smell your urine if that happens; when last
year in July I stopped eating bread my urine started to smell
foul. That is a sign that your body burns fat.
It is important to understand the role of
insulin: if insulin levels are too high your body cannot burn body
fat because it is in 'glucose mode' and as such it can only store
If insulin levels get lower and lower the more easy it is to
produce the ketone bodies.
Now dementia is also known as diabetes type
3, this means that the brain has become tolerant for insulin so
even elevated levels of insulin in the brain does not help for
running on glucose from the food.
But your body can also not produce ketone
bodies during the day if for example in the morning you ate a few
slices of bread. After eating bread for many many hours your
insulin levels are just too high.
In a nutshell this is how the development of
1) The brain does not react any longer on
2) Therefore the brain cannot retrieve energy from the glucose in
your blood, but
3) Because insulin is elevated your body cannot produce the ketone
bodies that otherwise would form an alternative for glucose.
So simple is the main mechanism, it is a lack
of energy for the brain and as such it starts malfunctioning in
Now how do I know that after eating bread
your body cannot burn fat?
My entire life as an adult I always woke up
in the middle of the night, usually about five hours after I had
my last slice of bread and I woke up from the hunger.
I always had the alternative of not eating but in that case I
could never go to sleep again and five hours of sleep is also
So I always ate some bread and went to sleep again...
Lately the product known as coconut oil is
rather trendy, I am using it myself and the supermarket Aldi has a
biological version for only 3€ per pound. This stuff also
contains ketones. Elderly with beginning symptoms of dementia
often show improvement when they eat food prepared with coconut
Now coconut oil is not a bad thing, but it
would be best if people avoid all sugar and all carbohydrates; eat
like you have diabetes and avoid anything that can turn into
In my home country the Netherlands about a
quarter of a million people have dementia and that will rise to
about 400 thousand in the future.
This is easy to prevent but the problem in my country is that the
government sponsors and promotes the eating of bread on a daily
Once more: It is always stupidity that kills
the most people...
From the National intsitutes of health I have
this next modified picture about what the energy shortage does
with a human brain (don't forget a healthy brain consumes about
20% of all energy your body needs):
Also nice about coconut oil:
Coconut Oil As an Alzheimer's Treatment - Dr. Mary Newport
Ok the next update is a math update because I
have been working on a 'hardcore appendix' to the latest
Or it will be an electron = magnetic monopole update because I
found that giant stupid mistake all those physics professors make;
they do not understand you can add magnetic fields and instead of
it they produce weird quantum mechanics bla bla bla.
Keep tuned, till updates.
(27 July 2015) Those pictures and movies from
the Pluto mission are not only awesome, they are ultra
Therefore I have decided to unveil a new
class of new trigonometric identities and for one week this class
of infinitely many identities will have the name of 'NASA
After the next week the class of
trigonometric identities, I am so sorry, but they must have their
old name back and the old name is:
Determinants of exponential circles &
Item 1) For seven days on a row they are
named 'NASA equations'.
Item 1) For seven
days on a row they are named 'NASA equations'.
Now why only seven days on a row name it the
NASA equations or the NASA identities?
That is because far to often equations are
given the name of the human person that more or less discovered
those equations for the very first time.
That is a stupid way of labeling math
equations, paramount should be what these particular set of
equations do or try to describe.
And as such 'determinant of exponential
circles' is far more informing compared to 'NASA equations in
Let's leave it with that. Here is the teaser
picture for the NASA 3D equations:
Let's leave it with that. Till
Update from 29 July; Here is a screen shot from the above new
Let me also give you the code that you can
cut and paste into that applet found on the university of Leiden
and thereafter the link to that applet:
(sin(3*x)/(3*sin(x)))^3 + (sin(3*(x - pi/3))/(3*sin(x - pi/3)))^3 + (sin(3*(x - 2*pi/3))/(3*sin(x - 2*pi/3)))^3 -
3*(sin(3*x)/(3*sin(x)))*(sin(3*(x - pi/3))/(3*sin(x - pi/3)))*(sin(3*(x - 2*pi/3))/(3*sin(x - 2*pi/3)))
WWW Interactieve Multipurpose Server
Once more: You must search a bit until you
find that applet named Animated drawing. I cannot give you a
direct link because this server has session bounded pages so the
link that works for me might not work for you...
But isn't it awesome? A third degree
polynomial in three variables with the name determinant and it is
always precisely one...
Ok till updates, rather likely it is going to
be a food update because I came across this terribly bad
documentary under the name The War on Wheat - the fifth estate
And this is such a horrible bad bad
documentary, the so called 'scientists' in it absolutely have no
idea about for example the role of bread and wheat when it comes
to stuff like dementia. It is not only that eating bread is a necessary
condition for developing dementia in the first place, in the
second place if you keep on eating bread the illness only speeds
up and up and up.
And it is all so fucking simple to understand...
(21 July 2015) The last days I wrote two
appendices to the 'screen shot update' on the higher dimensional
Appendix 1 is about how I found the modified Dirichlet kernels
Appendix 2 shows six different ways to find the exponential circle
in 3D space.
Here is the
link to the appendices.
But today we are using so called 'angular
momentum theory' for electrons to destroy once more the idea that
electrons are magnetic dipoles on their own.
Item 1) How to add magnetism.
Item 1) How to add
First we are going to do a thought experiment
with bar magnets (square shaped bar magnets so all four of the
long sided of the bar magnet have equal area).
But first you must know what magnetic dipole moment is.
Magnetic dipole moment is easy to understand;
it is the strength of the magnet multiplied by the height. Or,
more precise: multiplied by the distance between the north and
Now for a bar magnet this is easy to
calculate if you know the strength of a particular metal you can
make magnet from. For example iron; if the magnets are produced
properly the strength is proportional to the amount of iron
Magnets can have all kinds of shapes, for
example sphere shaped or egg shaped.
We will not go into that.
Now to the electron; here is the source file
Angular momentum operator
Now we do our thought experiment:
Take two bar magnets and put them together so
that the length doubles, of course you must attach north to south
in the middle.
It is 100% obvious that because the distance
between north and south is now double, the magnetic dipole moment
is now double. You can code this as NSNS.
Now you put the magnets together in such a
way that the thickness doubles, code it like
So you twist one magnet 180 degrees and put
What happens to the magnetic dipole
That has become less because where the
magnets touch all magnetism stays indide.
You can argue that since two sides are now packed together there
are only 6 remaining sides where with the long NSNS magnets you
still had 8 sides.
So total 'magnetic dipole moment' is roughly
1.5 times that of one bar magnet.
It is important to remark this construction
is a magnetic quadrapole and not longer a dipole so 'dippole
moment becomes a fuzzy notion...
You see that if you put two dipole magnets
together the way they are oriented in space becomes very important
because sometimes the dipole moments enforce each other but if you
turn one magnet total magnetism becomes less because they are
eating each others magnetic field instead of making it only
In this simple formulae the J stands for the
total and L stands for orbital magnetism and S is the so called
But nowhere there is talk about the
orientation of the magnetic dipole stuff L and S.
Now since L is orbital magnetism related to
the electrons going round the nucleus of the atom we can be 100%
sure that L is related to a magnetic dipole.
But if you can always add the S to it, the
logical conclusion is that spin cannot be a magnetic dipole
Now this is a very general thing: always when
there is talk about magnetic spin you can always add it up or subtract
it and never the orientation in space is mentioned.
Hence magnetic spin of electrons is not
dipole in nature but monopole, exactly like the electrical charge
of an electron...
You know there are days that I wonder how the
professors could get so retarded.
The math professors with their complex numbers, they have only the
2D version of it.
The physics professors with magnetic dipole electrons.
I mean this whole universe could not be the
way it is if the professional physics professors were telling the
Till updates my dear reader.
(14 July 2015) Ok 21 fresh pages on a subject
known as the missing equations.
It is on page 3 of the higher dimensional
complex numbers although in this long update I only used circular
Item 1) The missing equations.
Item 1) The missing
You can check all the given screen shots for
yourself using an applet named Animated drawing that you can find
On page 21 of the long update you find the
sum of 11 coordinate functions in 11D space; look for the explicit
function variant of Animated drawing and cut and past the next
text into it and observe you get the constant value 1.
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - pi/11))/sin(x - pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 2*pi/11))/sin(x - 2*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 3*pi/11))/sin(x - 3*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 4*pi/11))/sin(x - 4*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 5*pi/11))/sin(x - 5*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 6*pi/11))/sin(x - 6*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 7*pi/11))/sin(x - 7*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 8*pi/11))/sin(x - 8*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 9*pi/11))/sin(x - 9*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 10*pi/11))/sin(x - 10*pi/11))
Click on the third teaser picture in order to land on the latest
math update about the missing equations:
Till updates my dear reader.
(13 July 2015) In one or two days I will hang
in the next math update; it is not really math but more like math
done physics style. I have all these missing equations so a math
approach is more or less impossible, so if a particular equation
passes a test this validates my theory of modified Dirichlet
kernels ruling the higher dimensional complex numbers...
Item 1) The second teaser picture for the
missing equations update.
Item 1) The second
teaser picture for the missing equations update.
The second teaser picture is a fragment from
the biggest collection of equations I have ever solved in my
Now it is not that I have to solve this
problem and arrive at a solution, no it is the other way around: I
have a perfect solution but I lack equations...
And the higher the dimensions get, the more
stuff that is missing but, ha ha ha, my solutions stays
If you want to see the largest system of
equations I ever solved, click on the above picture.
End of this update, till updates.
(10 July 2015) Since it is Greece week, why
not post that Google talk about that ancient Greek
After all in this Google talk we observe how
images can be modified to show deep detail and this is nicely in
line with something like two decades ago when I found the perfect
format for 3D imaging.
Of course Dutch universities, skilled as they
are, never picked up on the theory of geometric differentiation or
on geometric integration.
Once a retard, always a retard.
Item 1) The most perfect Google talk ever
Item 1) The most
perfect Google talk ever observed....
It is just a link to some good math
perfection, decades ago I envisioned this kind of math with
geometrical objects. And as usual nothing happened because the
Dutch universities are so full of shit.
It is very interesting to observe that the
Dutch academic folks are very full of shit;
If you weigh the amount of shit before & and after a toilet
visit, there is no significant difference.
Lets leave it with that and post one of the
most beautiful math insights on 3D imaging:
Imaging the Antikythera Mechanism
Till updates my dear
(09 July 2015) I thought I asked the people
from the science of physics to 'make some noise' so I wonder why I
do not hear anything... Why live like those math professor weasels
and non-performers? Get a life, make some noise!
Item 1) What if electrons were magnetic
dipoles? Part 2.
Item 1) What if
electrons were magnetic dipoles? Part 2.
If electrons would be magnetic dipoles as the
professional physics professors believe they are, how come that in
all chemical bonds it is the electron pair that rules the
If electrons were magnetic dipoles, all kind
of weird electron configurations would be observed to the degree
the science of chemistry would be so different it makes we wonder
if life could exist in the very first place...
Now the idea of electrons being magnetic
dipoles can be disproved in hundreds of ways, today I will show
you that magnetic dipoles can be stacked together in all kinds of
ways that electrons do not do.
In all chemical bonds it is the electron pair
that spans up our planet, but if the professional physics
professors were telling the truth we would also have electron
triples, quadruples, etc etc.
So the next picture with six magnetic dipole
macro world magnets says its all:
The professional physics professors should do
a little bit of rethinking:
As you see on inspection, magnetic dipoles
can be stacked up into any kind of number...
The prevalence for electron pairs is nowhere
observed, hence electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles. Till updates
my dear reader.
(08 July 2015) Today I more or less enjoyed
very much the sounds coming from the European parliament where the
Greek pm Tsipras hold a speech and weirdly enough a lot of
countries voiced precisely what they thought.
Well my position is clear, but I was glad to
see some democracy in action...
May be, very may be I will participate in future elections
Anyway today we will be looking at electrons
once more because it would be a true disaster if they really were
magnetic dipoles as they are in the belief system of the
professional physics professors on all universities around the
Once more: If you organize your science as a
substitute for religion you will run into the exact same problems
as the Catholic church with Galileo...
Item 1) What if electrons were magnetic
Item 1) What if
electrons were magnetic dipoles?
From the science of chemistry we know that
electron pairs are more or less the driving force in all chemical
bonds inside molecules. Only electron pairs have been observed,
there is plenty of electron pair theory around.
But if electrons were magnetic dipoles and
not magnetic monopoles, how can it be they only come in pairs and
not in more complicated structures???
Here is a wiki upon electron pair
Polyhedral skeletal electron pair theory
As far as I understand reality, it has to be
that the electron pair is the smallest magnetic dipole there is.
The particles known as neutrinos are much smaller that the
electron but neutrinos as so weak in interactions that I do not
think they have a magnetic charge or an electric charge at
Now the idea of electrons being magnetic
monopoles makes a lot of sense compared to what those professional
physics people talk, so we do a bit of 'though experiment' and we
buy for 1.50€ six dipole magnets in a shop.
How can we arrange them and we wonder if
electrons were magnetic dipoles how can it be we only observe
Here are the six magnets for 25 cents each, I
let them into the plastic shielding because that represents the
repelling force electrons have from having the same electrical
These are disk shaped macroscopic magnets, I
was lucky to buy a packet where the magnetic north or south was up
or down in 3 magnets. That explains why this cluster of 6 magnetic
dipoles sticks together...
Another way of arrangement goes like
Once more: the plastic layer represents the
repelling forces from equal electrical charges. The 1€ + 50 cent
coin represent the total costs of this physics experiment.
Let's leave it with that, till updates my
(05 July 2015) A short update on the outcome
of the Greece referendum; I will explain in very simple terms why
I am in favor of a debt reduction to 15 thousand per Greek capita
citizen. That would be a reduction of about 8 thousand € per
Item 1) One decade of economical havoc is
enough for Greece.
Item 1) One decade of
economical havoc is enough for Greece.
From the beginning our political leaders
constantly had other insights compared to me; for example when the
credit crisis broke out (by the way the political talking heads of
today did not see it coming, for me it was 100% it was coming) it
was a feature that private debt collapsed, clustered together and
taken over by the diverse governments.
In the case of Greece this was a bit mistake;
the private debt holders had some haircuts but the European
leaders should never have taken over this debt.
But they did because they were afraid that a
bankrupt Greece would spread out...
Anyway to make a long long story short; at
present the Greeks are supposed to pay all the debt back in a time
scale of 32 years, anyway that is what Jeroen Dijsselbloem said
The present deal with Greece is rooted in
emotions from the time we had only golden and silver coins; yet
modern money if fiat money and if handled carefully there is
unlimited supply of that stuff...
Why is one decade of misery for Greece
Ten years of misery is enough to burn it into
the collective memory that debt hugging is very unwise. Now the
Greek economy is in a state where fiat money cannot work...
For myself speaking, the Dutch government has
borrowed about 1000 € per Dutch citizen, a write off to the 15
thousand per Greek citizen would leave me at a loss of like 300 to
Now in Greece about 30% of all children live
under the so called poverty line and I have decided I don't need
those 300 to 400 €. I consider it blood money so I don't want
More fun stuff from Greece:
The 2000 Year-Old Computer - Decoding the Antikythera Mechanism (2012)
Till updates my dear reader & live well
in our system of fiat currency.
(02 July 2015) The last weeks I have been
working an a math update known as 'the missing equations'. That is
because those modified Dirichlet kernels might do a perfect job
but if we raise the dimension above 3 you already have the very
first missing equation.
I have tried to find the answer to this
problem of missing equations for about 18 months and I did not
make one millimeter of progress.
Item 1) The first teaser picture to the
update related to the missing equations.
Item 1) The first
teaser picture to the update related to the missing
It is just a teaser picture although it
contains rock hard math.
It is just a teaser picture but it contains
math that the general university math departments cannot explain
at all. Might that be a source of their weird weird
It is just a teaser picture, do not worry
that time lags rule the world.
You can check for yourself that these five
coordinate functions squared add up to 1 (so you can use them as
probability amplitudes like they do in quantum physics).
You must first search for a function graph plotter on this website
from the Leiden university, I cannot link directly for you because
it is an interactive server:
Here are the five squares, just cut and paste
it in the function graph plotter:
((1/5)*sin(5*x)/sin(x))^2 + ((1/5)*sin(5*(x-pi/5))/sin(x-pi/5))^2 + ((1/5)*sin(5*(x-2*pi/5))/sin(x-2*pi/5))^2 + ((1/5)*sin(5*(x-3*pi/5))/sin(x-3*pi/5))^2 + ((1/5)*sin(5*(x-4*pi/5))/sin(x-4*pi/5))^2
If all goes well you get the constant
function with value 1. It must look like this:
All these new trigonometric identities are
(27 June 2015) A short update on Greece since
it is highly likely they will miss
the IMF payment that supposedly had to be paid this week.
So Greece will go bankrupt and leave the Euro as her currency...
Item 1) In the year 2009 I wrote: Let's kick
Greece out and let Poland in.
Item 2) A very short food update.
Item 1) In the year
2009 I wrote: Let's kick Greece out and let Poland in.
Of course all political leaders thought in
the year 2009 that they could hang out the math professor and just
ignore that weirdo from kinkytshirts.nl.
Now my own home country has lend money to
Greece in the order of about 1000 € per capita Dutch citizen. As
a comparison every citizen from Greece is about 23,000 € in the
Needless to say 23,000 € is just too high
so for myself speaking I am glad we have this present situation.
Europe should have lowered that amount far more to say something
like 15,000 € per Greek citizen.
But hey when I wrote that; guess three times
what our political elite did?
Once more the hang out the math professor;
ignore the insight, look away, talk about teleportation with
quantum computers & so on and so on.
Will there be market turmoil on the financial
I hope so because I have still about 5 to 10
thousand € to invest in my pension portfolio so with a bit of
luck I can buy a bit on the dips...
Item 2) A very short food
On a website named science 2.0 I found a
relative good article about weight loss.
It has a bit of a strange title namely
Why Fat People Don't Lose Weight. The Diet Delusion
Of course diet is not a delusion, after all a
diet that works perfectly goes as this:
No sugar, no grains, plenty of exercise and
you eat only when you are hungry.
Basically it is that simple. Till updates my
(24 June 2015) An update on food because now
in the USA the number of obese people have passed the number of
In the meantime the average lifespan in the
USA is still not declining but somewhere in the next years the
average lifespan will start declining because of the strange food
they eat over there.
Item 1) The number of obese above the number
of overweight US folks? Yeah yeah...
Item 1) The number of
obese above the number of overweight US folks? Yeah yeah...
It is no secret I was more or less slim my
entire life until 2005 when I started gaining weight. At some
point I was a staggering maximum of 108,9 kilo and I decided to
cut the crap.
At present day I am terribly stable at about
80 kilo, just as an example I still weigh myself in the morning
although there is no reason for it any longer.
The last 10 days, for example, say:
80.1 80.4 80.4 80.4
80.4 80.7 80.5 80.1 80.1 80.0
One of the problems is that people understand
next to nothing about the food they eat, that goes from poverty
stricken families to government institutions.
For example in my home country the
Netherlands the government still promotes the eating of bread. But
after eating bread your body simply refuses to burn body fat and
as such you grow hungry far too early and the process of
overeating sets in just by eating bread on a daily basis...
And if you eat bread on a daily basis you
take up too much meals a day or you start snacking in between
meals so you constantly have insulin running around in your
Now guess what? You develop slowly but surely
a nice nice nice insulin tolerance; your body cells do not react
to insulin any longer and as such your body cells are starved
while you load in food all the time...
I mean this is no higher math, any body can
understand how stuff works.
But nothing happens, in my home country they
will keep on promoting crazy food like bread and in the USA they
will keep on using a poison named high fructose syrup (sponsored
by the USA government).
It will take some time but more and more the
future will look like this:
Yeah yeah, if you do not understand the food
you eat rather likely your children will not understand that weird
Links that might be interesting:
5 Shocking Facts About Obesity in America
The basis of my thinking about food is that
you should not eat stuff your body cannot digest, for example
eating stones every day is not good for your health.
And beside the vegetables that contain the fibers that are
non-digestible, is it wise for humans to eat wood on a daily
Actually the food industry uses plenty of
wood, they think you are not human but a wood worm and they name
Is common food additive to blame for rising rates of bowel disease?
So unless you have a strong desire to breed
very fat babies, one should avoid the things your human body
cannot digest. And eating wood is not a wise thing if you would
End of this food update, till
(21 June 2015) Correction on my previous
update from 15 June; I made an interpretation fault and that has
to be corrected of course.
Item 1) Correction and addendum to the
Item 1) Correction
and addendum to the previous update.
It was only this weekend that I found the
time to read the publication they talk about in the vids of the
previous update and I was totally wrong.
They were not trying to exploit the magnetic
dipole stuff of an electron but weirdly enough the electric dipole
stuff of an electron?
Electrons as electric dipoles??????????
Yes, it is a bit strange but you need that
for stuff like super symmetry to be true.
Now super symmetry is one of those things I
do not even try to understand because just like with string theory
you have these people that say:
But the math is so beautiful, it just has to
Always when I hear such words I run for
cover; the people are not capable of understanding 3D complex
numbers but their math is 'so beautiful it has to be true'.
Of course an electron is an electric monopole
and very very likely it is also a magnetic monopole. These physics
people have been wrong for decades on a row so likely their
condition of not understanding the electron will last a few
Some links related to the spherical
Electron Appears Spherical, Squashing Hopes for New Physics Theories
And, highly technical but only five pages
long on the pre-print archive:
Order of Magnitude Smaller Limit on the Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron
For me it is 100% weird to observe that there
is a group of physics people that hunt down the electric dipole
character of the electron while there is no experimental evidence
for the electron being a magnetic dipole at all.
Ok ok, when electrons truly go around the
nucleus that gives some magnetic dipole stuff on their own they
must be magnetic monopoles. You know I have two lists:
List 1 contains reasons as why they are
List 2 contains reasons as why they are magnetic dipoles.
In over a year time list number 2 is still
The only time electrons create a dipole magnetic field is when
they are in those s-orbitals going around the nucleus of an atom.
(An s-orbital is a spherical orbit.) Bbut that is the same as an
electrical current in the wires of a coil; it creates a magnetic
field but this does not stick to the electron itself... So list 2
stays empty for the time being.
This is the end of this correction &
addendum stuff. Let me close with that nice teaser picture once
more since after my view this is the way math should be done; keep
it simple like a fist in you face.
(15 June 2015) A short update with two links
where it is explained UK physics people cannot find the dipole
magnetic moment of an electron...
Of course they are not going to find that,
after all there are no experiments that validate that electrons
are magnetic dipoles. Anyway I have never seen them.
Item 1) Two vids from Sixty Symbols.
Item 1) Two vids from
Spherical Electron - Sixty Symbols
Spherical electron (extra footage)
The actual experiment is explained a bit in
minute 8.00 in the first vid; an electric field is reversed but
the electrons refuse to show any dipole magnetic behavior.
Well this all is nicely 100% in line with
what I was thinking after the Stern-Gerlach experiment. But hey,
this is strange: the S-G experiment was done in 1922, almost one
Why the hell was there never ever a physics
guy stating it had to be done by magnetic monopoles? Well, physicists
are university people and they only think 'What will the colleagues
think of it'. And as such instead of hunting down big results, the
emotional basis of their ways of thinking ensure they are only
But hey, much more important: don't forget
the latest update of 15 pages on a very simple model for the
strong interaction. After all the strong force is the strongest of
the fundamental forces and if you have good math with that; that
is the stuff that counts. And not like the local retards do with
their flies catching behaviour...
(14 June 2015) Fifteen fresh pages on the
strong interaction making a very simple model for how nuclear
particles like the proton and the neutron are hold together.
And, ha ha ha, yesterday I was viewing a
historical oversight of string theory. Now guess what? Originally
they tried to explain the strong interaction with it but they
failed. Of course if you use the wrong math it all will fail
completely, just like all those weirdo's that want to make quantum
computers using only 2D complex numbers.
The item for today:
Item 1) Strong Interaction, a simple math
Item 1) Strong
Interaction, a simple math model.
For me it is a great honor to publish this
update because what I consider myself as my greatest math
findings, the exponential circle and exponential curves, are a one
to one match when it comes down how protons and neutrons are
That goes for here on earth but also one
billion light years from here and not only now but also a billion
years in the future.
So I am very satisfied with 'just another day
at the office', now how will the people from the academic world
react on this math?
My guess is it will be the usual reaction:
Neglect, look away, never mention that guy, we need more money, we
need more money and we will build quantum computers for the future
of humanity & so on and so on.
The math professors here in Groningen will
not like it I am publishing the math only here. Now they cannot do
the plagiarism play like they did in the 1990-ties.
But let's not nag at the local retards. Again
for me it is a great honor to hit the button 'publish website' and
are the 15 pages of Strong Interaction.
I also activated the three teaser pictures
from previous updates to this homepage.
End of this update, till updates.
(10 June 2015) I will not deny this update is
a small attack on the suckers that suck in tax payer money in
order to study 'vibrating strings' from so called 'string
If you give me only one working vibrating
string, I will bow for your insights.
This is not the case in the year 2015,
so we craft a bit of 'string theory' ourselves using modified
Dirichclet kernels for ourselves.
Item 1) Teaser picture number 3 using
Dirichclet modified kernels.
Item 1) Teaser
picture number 3 using Dirichclet modified kernels.
Let me not do difficult on the math details because
if you need to publish 3 teaser pictures before there is an good
reaction you know:
These people are dumb and stupid for a good
After having said that, here the third
Now for the time lag g(t).
See you in about 300 years when finally the
human universities wanted to act as humans...
08 June 2015) Why not a second teaser
picture for that strange branch of physics known as 'string
theory'. Call me old fashioned but if you cannot verify your
theoretical results via experiment, why would you pursue a career
as a string physics professional???
Item 1) Second teaser picture for the
impending math update.
Item 1) Second teaser
picture for the impending math update.
Yes why would people enter a career as a
string theory professional when you never ever can check your
stuff via experiment?
That would be an odd thing to do.
Now one can argue that since string theory is
so beautiful when it comes to the math involved, it must have some
kernel of truth...
That all remains to be seen and that all is
about what is 'beautiful math' anyway.
Because retarded people if they find out that
3 + 7 = 10, they will say 'that is a beautiful
So here is the second teaser picture while
the first teaser picture is found scrolling down only to 04 June
Yes my dear physics professors; why is
I could give you mathematical answers but in
practice the coordinate function values are simply amplitudes of
11-dimensional probability distributions...
Just like it is in the 2-dimensional complex
End of the second teaser update, till
(04 June 2015) I am working on a relatively
long and detailed update on particle physics using 3D circular
numbers for making models for the proton and the neutron.
But in the science of physics there is also
that strange brand known as string theory.
I am not a big fan of string theory because you cannot validate
via experiment if the theoretical results are actually
Now those string theory folks always talk
about vibrating strings and that it is all 'mathematically
perfect' so it must have some kernel of truth...
And always you have that 11 dimensional space
popping up; in order for string theory to make sense they need 11
dimensions where there are 3 dimensions for our space and 8 more
that are bounded and very small...
So I am making a challenge out out of it,
that is the item of this update:
Item 1) People of string theory: give me your
11 dimensional coordinate functions.
Item 1) People of
string theory: give me your 11 dimensional coordinate functions.
If indeed our universe is build from
vibrating strings on an extremely small scale, one way or the
other the concept of time also plays some role. So for example of
the proton and the neutron; what is exactly vibrating in 11
dimensions and please give me the coordinate functions for all
these 11 dimensions.
In about one week my detailed update on
particle physics related to the proton and the neutron will be
ready and in a small appendix I will give you the details of
crafting a curve that is periodic in 11 dimensions.
That is the end of this update; show me the
money, what is the math behind the vibrating strings
Till updates. Update from 05 June;
teaser picture for the string theory folks:
This graph from a modified Dirichlet kernel
is the very first coordinate function x(t), the other 10
coordinate functions are time delays of this very first coordinate
If you put it together in an 11-dimensional
space you end up with a periodic curve, the only problem is: it is
not vibrating at all...
So once more: show me the money.
Or better: show me the math.
(02 June 2015) Very interesting is the BUK
news of today; the Russian manufacturer Almaz Antey that produces
the BUK systems claims it cannot be a Russian BUK but one from the
Ukrainian forces because it was an older type that was
That was what I was thinking in the very
first place, the idea that lives in the Western world that the
Russian government did send advanced weaponry to the Ukraine and
shot our Dutch folks from the sky was a pipedream in the first
A very important detail that is missing: Was
the crew that operated the BUK system from Russia yes or no? From
the very first beginning I always thought they were
Can we blame the Russian government for that?
No, they are not dictators like in that weird nation North Korea
so when volunteers go to the Ukraine that is more or less
That is today's item:
Item 1) Almaz Antey is willing to explain
technical details on filght MH17.
Item 1) Almaz Antey
is willing to explain technical details on filght MH17.
Almaz Antey is willing to detonate a modern
version of the BUK system attack rockets, of course there is no
reason to do this on high altitude. I hope my fellow Dutch folks
react a little bit enthusiastic on this news.
But once we have the warhead, we can also let
it explode our selves. Basically what we need are a few old
warheads and one of the more advanced versions from now.
Like I wrote before: we need the metal
shrapnel after the explosion of the warhead, fragments of that
must be buried inside the wreckage of flight MH17.
Now the company Almaz Antey also has proof
that the BUK was actually fired from a position controlled by the
That is a very interesting position to take
but it raises questions about why the Ukrainians would like to
down this particular flight.
I am sorry but from day one the most likely
scenario was a BUK system stolen from the Ukrainian forces
operated by voluntary Russians with no knowledge of the air space
being used by commercial flight.
The war tribunal has spoken: I do not blame
the Russian government for this.
It was all more or less a freak accident.
Missile-maker could blow up passenger jet to ‘prove MH17 not downed by Russian weapon’
Let's leave it with that, till updates my
(31 May 2015) On 15
Sept 2014 I made a math update on how you could use 3D numbers
to make a superposition of three quantum states.
Although I cannot find it back I also gave an example where you
can rotate three quantum states into each other.
Yesterday I found it turns out this is the
way protons and neutrons work; that is what this small update is
Item 1) Strong interaction.
Item 1) Strong
Yesterday like an innocent lamb I was just
Youtubbing around with a bit of weak force vids and a few strong
force vids and I came along a vid with the title Strong
I had absolutely no clue what strong
interaction was; only some vague notion it could be related to the
strong force that binds the quarks into protons and neutrons and
holds the nucleus of atoms together.
This is what I viewed:
Strong Interaction: The Four Fundamental Forces of Physics #1a
Strong Interaction: The Four Fundamental Forces of Physics
To my surprise what I did last September with
rotating the three colors of quarks into each other, it happens
all the time. With present day knowledge we understand it are the
gluons that constantly transport the so called 'color charge' of
the quarks around.
It is truly amazing; this math of 3D complex
and circular numbers have in their very heart the behavior of all
protons and neutrons in our universe.
So will the physics professors make some
noise or will they do weasel stuff like all math departments
Let's hope for the best but we must never
forget that physics people are university people too so they are
basically only interested about what their colleagues will think
of their contributions... (That is the way 21-th century science
works by the way, all these scientists are only pre-occupied about
what the colleagues will think of it.)
This is a small screen shot from the #1b
So I wish every body good luck in trying to
understand the higher dimensional exponential circles and what you
can do with them.
Of course that does not go for the math professors of this world;
as far as I am concerned they can get any cancer there is around
(29 May 2015) A small thought experiment on
electrical charges, in it I will make the same fault that physicists
have made with magnetism (I mean they think that electrons are
magnetic dipoles but they have no experimental proof
Item 1) A small thought experiment on
Item 1) A small
thought experiment on electrical charges.
Take any piece of matter that is
electronically neutral, so to say it has no net charge.
For example one kilo of iron.
Now cut it in half, you will see that both
half kilo's are electrically neutral; there is no charge in any of
the two parts.
Keep on chopping the stuff into smaller and
Every time you will observe no overall
Finally you come down to one atom of iron, if
it is not ionized the iron atom is electrically speaking
Now you separate the electrons from the iron
atom; the collection of electrons is electrically neutral just as
the nucleus of the iron atom.
Here we stop our thought experiment because
it has run off the rails of common knowledge: at present day we
believe strongly that electrons are negative and protons
positively charged particles.
But with magnetism we are always told by
professional physics professors that electrons are magnetic
dipoles because of a vague property known as spin.
And the professional professors speak words
In the Stern-Gerlach experiment the bipolar
electron anti-aligns itself with the inhomogenous magnetic field.
So half of them align and the other half anti-aligns itself.
After that they often wave their hands a bit
and tell you that quantum mechanics is so weird and so different
from our macroscopic world that it all behaves like no sane human
Well for myself speaking I have drawn my
conclusion and I make the following statement:
For the time being I consider the Stern-Gerlach
experiment the fundamental proof of electrons being magnetic
monopoles simply because a bipolar magnet of the size of an
electron cannot go 'anti-align' itself.
I have spoken, let's listen if their will be
(Or will it be just like the faggots and cowards from the math
Silence year in year out?
I hope it not but you never know with these people from the
After all they are some kind of perfumed princes living in a world
In the next picture the words 'ga terug' mean
like you have guessed go back.
Of course that symbolizes physics should hunt down the magnetic
monopole once more but now properly until you have it clear cut in
End of this update.
(26 May 2015) Stuff that goes under the name
tetraneutron is a configuration of 4 neutrons and this
configuration cannot be explained by the present theory on nuclear
forces. So let's do it 'magnetic monopole style'.
Item 1) Tetraneutron explained as four
Item 1) Tetraneutron
explained as four magnetic monopoles.
There is only one observation of tetraneutron
and even that one observation is disputed. From a distance I
cannot judge if this disputing makes sense, we must also take into
account since the standard model of particle physics cannot
explain such stuff, automatically it will come under attack.
Or, what I am having with the higher
dimensional complex numbers; the so called 'professional
professors' are trying to silence me to death. But I have declared
these people as pseudo scientists a long time ago and as such the
universities are all ngelectable quantities...
The next wiki gives the details: Tetraneutron
The French team in Caen used a highly
instable isotope where the nucleus has a so called halo of the
four neutrons together.
Under the hypothesis that all spin half
particles are magnetic monopoles, we already understood that this
gives rise to the existence of electron pairs. Because electrons
are electrically charged they cannot form structures that are
beyond the pair.
A neutron is not charged, anyway the total
charge is zero according to the standard accepted theory of
quarks, so if neutrons are also magnetic monopoles they can also
come in numbers like 2, 4, 6, 8 etc. As even numbers.
But it could also come are a cube shape with
8 neutrons where on every corner a north pole magnetic monopole
neutron is connected with 3 south pole neutrons (and vice versa;
it has to be an alternating structure where no two equal magnetic
monopoles touch each other).
Recall there are also neutron stars; likely
they are build in a similar fashion.
It was over one year ago that I realized
electrons could very well be magnetic monopoles and until now I
have not found one detail that points into another direction. Ok
ok, you have all those physics professors that say electrons are
magnetic dipoles, but they have no theoretical or experimental
proof for that.
It is just an assumption they believe in,
they have no proof whatsoever.
A nuclear halo? Nature has amazing strange
ways, but for this halo stuff there is indeed experimental
confidence because such nuclear structures with a loose halo are
far bigger compared to a nicely packed compact nucleus from a
This is the wiki: Halo nucleus
This is a screenshot from that very wiki
suggesting strongly that neutrons and protons can indeed form
pairs while neutrons can also come in a quadruplet.
Ok, that's it for this update. Till
(22 May 2015) On a wiki on electrons I found
a perfect photo that could show that electrons are magnetic
monopoles. Wikipedia wants me to 'attribute the author'.
Ok, but is the 'author' also the person that
took the photo in the first place?
Anyway, the attribution goes to:
"Cyclotron motion wider view" by Marcin Białek - Own work.
Ok, it says 'own work' so thanks for the
wonderful photo Marcin!
Item 1) From old television tubes to this
Item 1) From old
television tubes to this cyclotron photo.
Old black & white televisions needed
about 10 to 12 thousand Volts in their electron canon to work
properly, the color televisions (if memory serves) needed about 50
to 60 thousand Volt. Anyway the voltage is not important, the
relevant fact is that although beam of electrons are intrinsically
unstable because due to the equal electrical charge the beam will
widen over time, it was possible to write about 600 lines with
those electrical canons.
These tubes were marvelous creations of
electrical engineering, at the back of the television was a manual
regulator and with that you could control the so called 'synchronization'
that ensured the electron cannon was at the right point for every
new batch of 600 fresh lines to be written on the
The fact sync worked in the first place is a
true miracle; there is a small island of stability and the
engineers were capable of hunting it down...
Ok, lets return to our present year 2015
updates on electrons being magnetic monopoles, look at the picture
The electrons make only one round but this is
done in a homogeneous magnetic field.
The electron cannon spits out electrons at the cathode and they
are absorbed by the positive anode.
As you see in inspection, halfway into the
loop the electrons are widely dispersed. Ok ok, this could be
related to having a lousy electron cannon but it could also be
caused by electrons being magnetic monopoles.
After all these electrons are exposed to a
magnetic field perpendicular toward the curve they are forced to
take. And the magnetic monopole nature of the electrons make them
Nice picture isn't it?
Dutch learning's on the 'little donkey
bridge' or as we say it:
A donkey bridge is a simple way to memorize
stuff in such a way that minimizes future faults.
An example is cnap.
All you have to do is memorize the word cnap.
And after that for the rest of your life you will know that:
Cathode = negative while
Anode = positive.
After this Dutch learning, please observe in
the above picture that even applying a large anode, the electrons
still have a strong tendency to spread out.
Do not believe the bla bla talk of physics
professors; they talk about 'align with the magnetic field' and
'anti-align with the magnetic field'.
In the world physics professors live in, you
are not allowed to say what it is:
End of this update, till updates.
(20 May 2015) A short update on the Gauss
insights on magnetic monopoles, he thought magnetic monopoles do
Yet our little though experiment as electrons
being magnetic dipoles showed life on earth could not exist if
electrons were magnetic dipoles.
And you cannot argue with that; after all life on land exists...
Item 1) How Gauss viewed the stuff.
Item 1) How Gauss
viewed the stuff.
During the time Gauss lived electrons were
still not discovered so Gauss had no idea of their properties. The
ideas of Gauss boil down to the simple insight that magnetic field
lines are always closed, they are continuous loops contrary to
electrical fields that can go from plus to minus.
Now for a standard bar magnet or magnetism
from electricity, the Gauss ideas are about one hundred percent
correct. But if electrons are magnetic monopoles, in practice all
our permanent magnets would not behave exactly like Gauss
Since I like Gauss a lot, for me it is a
great honor to put forward one of his formulations of the
magnetical stuff. It is the version where all flux that goes in
also should go out; and mark my words; the mathematical
representation is perfect.
(Only those pesky electrons spoil all this
perfection in math...)
law for magnetism.
Now if indeed electrons are magnetic
monopoles, the picture changes dramatically and we have to rewrite
the basic laws of magnetism in a way that looks very similar to
I am not going to do that because I am a math
End of this short update, till updates.
Added 21 May: The electron was discovered in 1897. The next link
is about that discovery and these pages are definitely from the
stone age of the internet but anyway; it is a perfect read and not
Electron, J J Thomson 1897.
End of the extra update. Till
(17 May 2015) Ha ha ha, the well known 21 cm
wavelength from hydrogen explained via electrons being magnetic
monopoles + the ultrafine spectrum ideas.
Item 1) What causes the well known 21 cm
Item 1) What causes
the well known 21 cm wavelength radiation?
In the science of astronomy the
electro-magnetic wavelength of 21 cm are studied because this is a
very common wavelength observed throughout the universe and, for
example, you can use it to validate the so called 'red shift' that
says our universe is expanding everywhere.
Except for black holes, according to the
Einstein stuff black holes suck in space at the speed of light...
So black holes more or less act as the vacuum cleaners of all that
interstellar space that only produces more space.
Anyway, as I view the stuff with electron
spin there is nothing spinning at all since the observe magnetic
forces are so high the electron would be spinning at speeds far
beyond the speed of light.
Since an electron still has a tiny mass, this
cannot happen so why we are still talking about the spin of an
electron in the year 2015 beats me.
Electrons are basically magnetic monopoles,
electrons have only two possible quantum states when it comes to
magnetism: it is either north or south.
In that regard electrons are very different
from all macroscopic structures where there always are bipolar
Now below you see a nice picture about the 21
cm wavelength radiation, this wavelength is not only a fingerprint
of the expanding universe but also a fingerprint to the smallest
possible magnetic monopoles.
In the above picture you see the so called
'hyperfine structure' but what is ultrafine structure? Very
simple: although the magnetic monopole of a proton is nothing
compared to those of the electrons, nuclear spin of the proton
could also point down and while the hyperfine structure gives two
values for the hydrogen thing, the ultrafine spectrum would give
four different jumps in energy levels when ionization takes place...
Source of the picture: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/h21.html
End of this update, till updates.
(15 May 2015) A short update on the earth
magnetic field and a giant breach of that magnetic field that
reportedly by NASA was ten times as big as present day science
Of course 'present day science' thinks that
electrons are magnetic dipoles; of course this is not forbidden
but if that leads to all kinds of completely bizarre results or
theories you can also ponder the question as why electrons have to
be magnetic dipoles.
Item 1) NASA reports giant breach of the
earth magnetic field (in 2008)
Item 1) NASA reports
giant breach of the earth magnetic field (in 2008)
If your mind is open to electrons being
magnetic monopoles, in that case you would be able to understand
what happens during solar storms.
Yet if we believe the science of physics, for
some strange reason that nobody can explain properly or in some transparent
fashion, electrons have to be magnetic dipoles.
Now why do all those physics professors tell
you that electrons are magnetic dipoles while if that were true
life on earth could not exist?
That is because sciences like physics and
math are crafted just like they are one of the main religions
going round. When it comes to math & physics it looks mostly
like the religion of Christianity and the Muslim faith.
There are a few 'founders of that religion'
like Jesus or Mohammed and after that believers think those
prophets had 'eternal wisdom'. In science we also have prophets,
they have names like Einstein or Dirac or whatever what.
If you free yourself from the way your mind
works, you can do so called 'thought experiments'. And if the
thought experiment is solar wind or solar storm you have a better
understanding of what is happening in the first place.
Let me end the bla bla bla and post only one
link to my bla bla bla:
Giant Breach in Earth's Magnetic Field Discovered
End of this small update, till updates.
(11 May 2015, updated with isospin on 12 May) Yesterday I added six links to
the latest update in the math files that explores the possibility
that all spin half particles are magnetic monopoles.
And until yesterday I lived in a world where
protons would always have spin +1/2 and neutrons always -1/2.
Today I observed all kinds of weird information that shakes my
simple view on the neutron; that is the small update for
Item 1) Things I don't understand about
Item 1) Things I
don't understand about neutrons.
Inside the science of chemistry the basic
view is the period table of elements, but elements like magnesium
or whatever what can also have isotopes. These isotopes can be
stable or radioactive and decay over time in other stuff.
The only difference between isotopes is the
number of neutrons.
So basically the picture should be very simple: one more neutron
should lower the total spin of a nucleus while one less neutron
would raise the total spin.
Remark once more that I think there is
nothing spinning, it's all magnetic monopoles. And the sole fact
that neutrons can alter the magnetic spin of an atomic nucleus
also says all those physics professors are totally wrong with
relating the magnetic properties of small particles to rotation
& spinning stuff.
To make a long story short; adding or
subtracting only one neutron can alter the magnetic properties of
an atomic nucleus beyond belief.
In the next picture you see a bunch of
isotopes from magnesium and at the bottom you see a very weird
picture that supposedly contains the present day insights in
proton & neutron spin.
I would like to remark that I have no means
to check of this information is actually true, so for the time
being we suppose it is all correct...
Let me first give you the source files;
The table is from a website named webelements dot com, there for
all atomic elements you can find lots of properties of them. The
table is from the next page:
And the mind blowing picture on the proton
comes from the High Energy Physics information system.
If the https link does not work, try
In the table you observe adding one neutron
does weird things to the overall spin of a particular nucleus; are
there more spin half particles that are changing sign and if so,
WTF is going on???
Now I do not want to be left in all kinds of
details, but the word 'spin' for talking about magnetic properties
of small particles is a disaster in the first place. Ok, I will
not deny that a spinning electrical charge creates a magnetic
After all that is the way these very words
are written down; via electricity I can download it to my website
and those kinds of transports are always based on dipole
Let's leave it with that, but don't forget to
check out a few of those six links I posted yesterday:
The Aurora Borealis and magnetic
Till updates. One
day later; problem solved! Quarks that form protons and
neutrons are called up and down, but this does not mean their
magnetic spin is also up or down!
The names up and down are related to something completely else: isospin.
I was thinking that magnetic spin in quarks was related to their
electrical charge; so I am glad I figured out my fault...
So it is perfectly possible that adding one neutron to an isotope
completely changes the magnetic properties of the nucleus in
(Well I am not a particle physicists of course...)
(09 May 2015) A few day back in the math
files on higher dimensional complex numbers I posted an update
about the polar lights being caused by the fact that spin half
particles could be magnetic monopoles.
So that is the item for this update:
Item 1) Are all spin half particle actually
Item 1) Are all spin
half particle actually magnetic monopoles?
Electrons, protons and neutrons are all so
called spin half particles. But even the more basic building
blocks of nuclear particles like proton and neutron are supposed
to be of the spin half type of particles.
For electrons it is very simple to create an
experiment that will make the case for being magnetic monopoles.
As a matter of fact it already has been done; it is the famous
Stern Gerlach experiment.
But the original Stern Gerlach experiment
does not prove at all that electrons are magnetic monopoles; for
that you need the present day techno known as the MRI scanning
device as it is found in every big hospital in our Western
If the results of the Stern Gernlach
experiment can be done inside the working of a modern MRI scanning
device, that will prove electrons are magnetic monopoles...
But hey, I am spinning off from my direction
of posting a so called 'teaser picture' for the latest math
It has to be remarked that it is five pages
long and from the onset I tried to prevent writing down any
calculation whatsoever; but after a few days the blood creeps
where it cannot go and without thinking I wrote down example
So that explains the content of the teaser
picture; Even if I try to write only in words, one way or the
other the math will set in...
Ha ha, I never thought I would write on
Let me pop another beer to make the walk of
my life a bit more random!
Anyway, till updates.
(03 May 2015) This update is a small so
called 'thought experiment' on electrons being magnetic dipoles.
As a matter of fact it turns out that life on earth is not
possible if electrons were not magnetic monopoles...
Item 1) Hello physics professors; what
happens if electrons are magnetic dipoles?
Item 1) Hello
physics professors; what happens if electrons are magnetic
Hello physics professors from the noble
science of physics; since you are a strong believer in the
evolution of theory via experimental results that speak for
themselves, you are on the side of the reasonable sciences.
So that is completely unlike my own science,
in the science of math we only have lunatics and cowards; may be
that is caused by the fact inside math you cannot do experiments
in some kind of 'real world'.
Anyway, this is a short update. The thought
experiment is very simple:
You are an electron going via solar wind or
solar storm towards planet earth and we suppose you are a bipolar
magnet because of supposed 'intrinsic spin' or other 'bla bla bla
You are an evil electron, you have magnetic
bipolar disorder and you are approaching planet earth. What will
That is very simple: the bipolar electron has
a magnetic north and a south.
From the viewpoint of the impending electron,
all forces cancel out:
The earth has a magnetic North and a magnetic
South; what forces will the earth North pole do on the
Again very simple: The earth North will repel
the electron north and attract the electron south by the same
amount. Hence the result is a zero force.
The earth South pole will repel the electron
south and attract the electron north by the same amount. Hence the
result is zero force.
Since both magnetic poles of the earth
contribute to nothing at all on the impending electron, the only
thing the impending electron has to do is to align itself with the
earth magnetic field and after that it can penetrate the earth
magnetic field perpendicular.
That spells trouble, the electron will land
in the ozone layer that protects the earth for billions of
Now loose electrons and loose protons are
highly ionizing particles, so they will destroy the ozone layer
and life on this planet as we know it has never been there in the
End of this very simple to understand thought
experiment, I would like to remark a more 'professional reaction'
is expected by me from the physics professors and not act like
those sleaze balls and douche bags that run the scene in the
science of math...
Till updates. (One day later on 04
May I corrected the word 'slease' into 'sleaze' and I corrected
the start before item 1 and now it says life one earth can only
exist because electrons are magnetic monopoles...)
(27 April 2015) Polar light is a mysterious phenomenon,
the theory says it is solar wind from the sun going to the North
and South pole. The solar wind itself is plasma so loose electrons
and protons and may be the occasional helium nucleus.
But why do they go to the magnetic poles of
After all if the physicists are right and electrons are really
magnetic dipoles, in that case they could not be attracted by
either the North pole or the South pole.
After all in an electron the magnetic poles are so close that the
attraction delivered on the one pole is compensated by the
repelling of the other magnetic pole of the electron.
That is our item for today:
Item 1) Polar lights and the electron as
Item 1) Polar lights
and the electron as magnetic monopoles.
I am still amazed that I just cannot succeed
into finding just one example where electrons are truly dipoles
(ok ok, one electron circling one proton must be one, but that is
viewed as an electrical current).
It explains why electrons come in pairs in
the chemical sciences, that last fact explains as why molecule
orbits can only be full with an even number of electrons. So the
electrons being magnetic monopoles lies at the very heart of how
chemical reactions take place and at the very heart of how
molecules are build up.
Now it has been found in the last century
that the polar light is incoming solar wind along magnetic lines
from the earth magnetic field. But my dear professional
physicists; does a small magnetic dipole do such a thing?
No that does not work, if you use a difficult
line of reasoning like 'the one magnetic pole is a tiny closer to
earth compared to the other, so the dipole closes to earth wins it
and it gets attracted to earth' is rubbis:
If that were true the electrons (and protons) would come in at
such a slow speed we would not see any light at all...
That amazing thing that we see light is just
one of the many reasons that electrons must be magnetic
Very likely the professional physics
professors will react exactly the same as the cowards from
mathematics; They will stay silent.
So let's not waste time on a collection of
cowards with severe cognitive malfunction. Let's look at a nice
video of the polar light itself and in the meantime wonder if
electrons could be magnetic dipoles via another line of
Title Youtuve video: Het
Noorderlicht (The Polar light).
From the social point of view I expect
physics professors to react the same as the non reacting math
professors on the higher dimensional complex numbers.
But where my own kind of math folks are just
too fucking stupid combined with cowardice, the physics professors
will over time understand that electrons being magnetic monopoles
is not the most crazy idea in the world.
So only cowardice will be the main source of
their non reacting, whereas with math professors you have this
wall to wall & floor to ceiling stupidity. And there is no
cure for stupidity...
End of this update, till
(25 April 2015) On 08 Sept 2014 I started the
third gluten experiment about how the gluten in your daily bread
is completely non bio-degradable and as such eating bread gives a
wide spectrum of health issues in humans.
After over 6 months the final results are in
and they are very interesting.
That is today's item, a food item about that poison named
Item 1) Final photo result of the third
Item 1) Final photo
result of the third gluten experiment.
Gluten is one of the set of molecules that
are hard to digest, just like drinking mineral oil is bad for your
health, eating gluten erodes your long term health.
For the wheat gluten is God's gift to wheat;
without the gluten all grains would rot away during the winter
season and as such wheat has adapted itself to grow in places with
greater seasonal changes. (Read spread out to the colder
It is no secret that I am allergic to gluten,
therefore it has my interest in the first place...
If you do your daily shopping I always have a
strong interest in what unhealthy looking people buy for their
daily food. So often it is a bread that they are buying, it is
amazing once you realize this that so often bread consumption is
tied to bad health.
Young people have no problem with it, they
are like a 'boss' in video games; they can eat all the bread they
want until, ha ha ha, if you shoot long enough in a video game all
bosses can be killed.
For myself speaking; in the first 50 years of
my life I was not allergic to the grain named wheat but when I
started consuming a so called 'health product' from the company
Unilever my health spiraled down rapidly.
Checking the details, it was one of the food
additives known as the 'taste enhancers' that changed my food
intolerance towards a deadly allergy.
Therefore in the future I will destroy the
market value of the company named Unilever; do you think I am
bluffing??? Better think twice.
The third gluten experiment is also is way of
understanding how the food industry makes consumers to overeat,
and there are many legal ways to make consumers food
In the third gluten experiment I added a lot
of Camembert fungus to the gluten in order to observe how the
gluten would bread down. How 'dio degradable' is it?
After all, when I am brewing beer the gluten
is killed in about 75 minutes during the mashing process, but for
that you need the enzymes inside your malts and wheat just has
none of those enzymes.
To make a long story short: You should not
eat stuff your body cannot digest. Just like you do not drink
petroleum or gasoline or breath natural gas, you should not eat
the biggest money maker in the food industry: Wheat & all
things related to wheat.
After 7 months of waiting, the latest non
digestible parts of pure gluten are finally under the
It took a long time to degrade, but now it
looks like a liquid. Yet just below the surface their are still
blocks of gluten.
In the next gluten experiment I will add the
enzymes from barley. My expectation is that the enzymes from
barley kill all the attitudes the wheat gluten has.
End of this update, till updates.
(18 April 2015) This day I hang the 16 pages
on the curves of grace into this website. It is 3D stuff only, in
higher dimensions like 5D or so you have much much more of
Item 1) The curves of grace (3D version only)
Item 1) The curves of
grace (3D version only)
Ok, I will explain as why I breach my own
embargo of publishing at most 10% of new results found. It is very
simple: may be with cracking the Riemann hypothesis in dimensions
above 2 (the complex plane) you need knowledge upon these curves
I think that zero's of the Riemann zeta
function are found in the direction of the tau number (just like
in the complex plane where they are on the so called critical line
inside the critical strip).
Previously I said: Look in the direction of the 'imitators of i'.
The imitators of i and their time evolution are always factored by
curves of grace.
Well enough of the bla bla bla, I composed
the 16 pages long update such that even so called 'professional
professors' in math could understand it (if they wanted it).
But given their fundamental love for being
incompetent, likely they even do not want it...
Let it be, click on the teaser picture to
land on the latest update:
End of this update, till updates.
(17 April 2015) Wow wow wow, I just finished
the impending 16 page long math update upon the curves of grace.
Therefore while drinking another home brew of beer, lets look at
For a few weeks I am roasting coffee beans
for myself and I have to say:
This is so much better compared to what you can buy as pre-roasted
coffee that I will keep on roasting my unroasted coffee beans for
a few more years...
Roasting coffee is very simple; compared to
roasting malts for beer brewing it is a plane cake walk.
Only one item for today, I am a big fan of
the company named SpaceX.
And today SpaceX delivered a coffee machine to the international
Item 1) Coffee in space.
Item 1) Coffee in
I am completely unfamiliar with coffee in
space, so the intellectuals from the British Telegraph will do the
talking for me:
SpaceX Dragon delivers espresso maker to International Space Station.
End of this important update upon coffee in
(15 April 2015) Oh oh, how could I make a
teaser picture riddled with so many faults?
The answer is simple: Never update math stuff while drinking too
much home brew beer.
So this small update is only showing the more
or less correct teaser picture as it should have been in the first
Item 1) Teaser picture without all those
drunk from beer faults.
Item 1) Teaser
picture without all those drunk from beer faults.
Anyway to make a long story short: After
thinking a few days upon the way black holes work using my simple
math model of time evolution like e^jt, I think I have made good
understanding in the geometry of a black hole sucking in all that
matter from a so called accretion disk.
Of course I cannot expose it in detail
because that costs so many hours of work while the so called
'academic professionals' show 0.0 interest.
Why should I waste my time on garbage people?
Why should I waste my time on pseudo scientists?
After having said that, here is the teaser
picture as it was supposed to be:
(12 April 2015) A small update on so called
'curves of grace'.
Item 1) Impending math update: The curves of
Item 1) Impending
math update: The curves of grace.
About 25 years ago I studied the properties
of the 3 Taylor series as you see on the bottom of the teaser
picture. These are extensions of the sin, cos, sinh and the
But that was before I found the higher
dimensional complex numbers and if you only have Taylor series in
you mathematical toolbox, you will make some progress but not
Yet let me not do negative on Taylor series,
if you see them for the first time they are magical, or aren't
Anyway, I just finished a relatively long
investigation into the 3D curves of grace and like I expected they
could be the perfect starting point of making a math model of how
matter behaves around black holes.
Ok ok, the model needs some perfection
because with e^jt the matter goes from outside of the accretion
disk to the outside of the alpha line. But it keeps accelerating
So I have to temper the speed of time a
May be in the future I will try to temper
time with the way time slows down using the ideas of the Einstein
But the extremely simple model e^jt works
perfect in the sense that matter inside the accretion disk goes
indeed into the black hole.
Like said before: The way black holes behave
is the shortest possible advertisement for 3D complex numbers. Of
course that will fall on deaf ears because for the professional
professors being incompetent is a choice they make day in day out
Enough of the bla bla bla, here is a teaser
picture and it is important to remark I did not use any theory of
differential equations but only a mixture of 2D numbers from the
complex plane together with my own 3D complex numbers.
(Ha ha, yesterday I forgot the division by 3
in the coordinate functions; may be I should not update after a
few liters of home brew...;)
The update will be rather long so in a week
or so it will be published; in the meantime the professional math
professors could prove they are actually worth all those boatloads
of tax payer money by finding the solutions to the non-alternating
Taylor series in the above picture.
(09 April 2015) A few days back I posted a
short update on my views as electrons being magnetic monopoles. I
think electrons are magnetic monopoles and that the transition
from the north state to the south state can be calculated
So in this update I show you one of those
weirdo's that try to build quantum computers based upon the idea
that electrons on their own are magnetic dipoles...
Item 1) With scientists like that, when will
the first quantum computer be there?
Item 1) With
scientists like that, when will the first quantum computer be
If you keep on thinking electrons are dipole
magnets whatsoever, you will never be able to harness the power of
a quantum computer. If you for vague emotional reasons keep on
hanging to a belief system that just does not work, all your ideas
about quantum computers will fade into insignificance.
I have selected for you a moment in time
where so called 'leading scientists' expose their emotional bounds
to electrons being magnetic dipoles all of the time.
I think it is a bag of rubbish and because it
is a bag of rubbish all those so called quantum computers that
they build at for example the D-wave factories, they will not
That's what I think; the 'moment of time' is
one minute and ten seconds, or 1:10 in the next Youtubber:
Does a Quantum Computer Work?
Electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles, if they
were dipoles only a very small fraction would go against the
inhomogenous magnetic field. But if about half of the electrons
are capable of fighting the stronger part of the magnetic field,
this can only mean they are magnetic monopoles...
About 3 days back I posted this monopole
stuff on electrons.
End of this update, till updates.
(02 April 2015) An update in Dutch because
our minister of economical affairs made a few comments lately
about stopping the gas production in a fundamental way.
For the first time I agree with him and I would like to explain
why this is good over a long long time haul (centuries so to say).
Item 1) Voordelen van aardwarmte.
Item 1) Voordelen
Meer restwarmte en aardwarmte gebruiken is een goed idee,
men probeert nog veel meer zoals bijv biobrandstoffen. Maar bio
brandstoffen lossen het probleem van te hoge concentraties
broeikas gassen helemaal niet op; je ziet al die maffe auto's
rondrijden met daarop 'Wij rijden duurzaam op aardgas'.
Nou nee dus, bio brandstoffen zijn misschien minder idioot
dan zo snel mogelijk de voorraad aardolie & gas opmaken, maar
het probleem van te hoge concentraties broeikas gassen blijft
De planeet aarde is, net als de zon, een enorme zak warmte.
Heel langzaam komt die warmte naar buiten, bijv de ijzeren kern
van de aarde groeit elke 1000 jaar ongeveer 1 contimeter. Per
miljoen jaar dus ongeveer 10 meter; dat komt omdat de radioactieve
processen die de kern van de aarde warm houden natuurlijk ook eens
opraken. Maar dat duurt enorm lang gelukkig.
Nou wat is het grote voordeel van aardwarmte gebruiken?
Eenvoudig: Je verstookt veel minder fossiele brandstoffen en
het is de enigste manier om het overschot aan warmte hier op aarde
simpelweg het heelal in te stralen.
Elke keer als het helder weer is dan straalt elke huis warmte
het heelal in.
Technische kanttekeningen; Als je warmte oppomt dan is dat
equivalent met het koelen van de bodem op grote diepte; echter
transport van warmte gaat enorm langzaam. Ik weet niet hoe snel
maar als je teveel warmte oppompt dan werkt zo'n plek na een
aantal jaren niet meer.
Maar als wij voor hele stadswijken warmte gaan oppompen dan
hebben we heel veel nodig want bijv in het jaar 2199 wil men ook
graag elke dag een warme douce nemen.
Het is daarom waarschijnlijk verstandig om bij het boren
direct drie of vier verschillende aftappunten te hebben. Als je
dan één jaar zo'n aftappunt gebruikt hebt, dan ga je naar de
volgende die bijv een aantal honderden meters dieper ligt. Na vier
jaar kom je dan weer bij je eerste aftappunt uit.
En al dat boren in de grond dan?
Nou hebben we al niet een club die dat goed kan?
Dat is de NAM enzo...
Kijk dit is enorm duur natuurlijk; aan de
andere kant de gewonnen warmte is gratis. En als het zo gemaakt
kan worden dat één boorput makkelijk 50 jaar meegaat dan zullen
de kosten op termijn best meevallen.
Maar dit is echt zo'n geval van 'De kost gaet
voor de baet uit'.
Dat was het, tot opdatums.
(29 March 2015) A short food update upon the
Alzheimer disease that is now declared diabetes type 3. For myself
speaking I was more or less totally surprised by the fact our own
brains also make insulin. So I was chewing on that a few
Item 1) I think type 3 diabetes is for real,
but lots of stuff is still unknown.
Item 1) I think type
3 diabetes is for real, but lots of stuff is still unknown.
A relatively good starting link is the next:
Alzheimer's Is Type 3 Diabetes
In the above link there are many good links
to other pages.
Another link contains the name of a chick
named Suzanne de la Monte. I don't know much about her but it
seems she can do animal experiments in such a way they develop
If true, Suzanne is at least worth her weight
Alzheimer's Disease Is Type 3 Diabetes–Evidence
Last December it came out the Unilever is
separating her spread division from the core kernel of her other
commercial activities. Investors applaud this for reasons of
'declining returns' and so.
After my humble opnion; these investor folks
do not understand what Unilever knows about food and future
judicial stuff. If indeed the dangers of transfats are understood
by Unilever food experts for decades, it is indeed very wise to
separate the spread division...
Here in one of the separated products:
Let's leave it with that.
(26 March 2015) Today I finished the nine
page update on the Riemann zeta function in 3D complex number
space. It is nine pages of what is supposed to look as numerical
mathematics, I have to say it was a pleasure to write
Item 1) Zeta on the critical strip (3D
Item 1) Zeta on the
critical strip (3D version only).
Let me repeat the teaser picture, if you
click on it you are supposed to land on the latest math
End of this update, till updates.
(23 March 2015) Because I am a very lousy
computer programmer I wrote a 9 pages piece that might help
skilled computer programmers to find the zero's of the most famous
math problem that is standing open into higher dimensions.
At the same time I am trying to learn one of
those modern computer programming languages, namely C sharp. And
that is the item of today:
Item 1) C# or C sharp? For me it is C
Item 1) C# or C
sharp? For me it is C stupid.
Let me be clear: This is not an attack on the
software company Microsoft because after all they have their
customer base and as such it is highly logical that even modern
computer programming languages do not suit the math mind.
But I do not complain, yet it has to be in
these files that when I execute the command
Xcoord[k] = Xcoord[k]/3
I get the correct answers inside C
But if I do
Xcoord[k] = Xcoord[k]*(1/3)
the whole thing reacts very differently and I
only get zero's...
My dear Microsoft, how can this be?
Anyway, lately I am hunting down the zero's
of the Riemann zeta function in higher dimensional number systems.
And although there is some progress on my side of the story, for
me it is frustrating that even modern computer languages are so
bad at math.
But the hunt itself is very beautiful; If the
zero's of the Riemann zeta function fall outside any exponential
circle or higher dimensional exponential curve; rather likely the universe
will collapse instantly.
End of the bla bla bla, here is a nice picture
with the explicit formulas included for the Riemann zeta function
zero's in 3D.
In the picture you see that 14, 1347 etc.
Well that is the first non-trivial zero of the Riemann thing. As
far as I understand reality, this stuff can be used for all zero's
as they are found inside the complex plane.
I crafted these three coordinate functions in
such a way you can fill in the values as they go around for the
Riemann stuff in the complex plane...
Updated on 24 March: With every update I
forgot to correct what I said in previous updates; If there are
zero's of the Riemann zeta function in 3D and you use the
Dirichlet eta function, in that case you will not get a zero but a
multiple of the number alpha.
So a multiple of a
= (1, -1, 1)/3.
The reason is the same as discussed in the 05
Jan 2014 update:
Adding stuff up from the exponential circle
gives an extra alpha, for example the geometric series for the
roots of unity in 3D.
See the old update:
Song of Omega Reloaded,
The 3-dimensional roots of unity omega.
(19 March 2015) A food & celebrities
update; Reinko goes show news gossip
Item 1) Has Amy Macdonald stopped eating
Item 1) Has Amy
Macdonald stopped eating bread?
Amy Macdonald is a Scottish singer and by
sheer accident the Youtube channel started beaming the
registration of a concert from 2014 to my flatsceen monitor.
Anyway, I was struck by the change in
This is how a female like Amy is supposed to look when not eating
all that weird food:
Amy Macdonald - Baloise Session 2014 - Full Concert
Now compare that to the way she looked during
their first hit 'This is the life'
Amy Macdonald - This Is The Life
Here you see the striking difference; females
that eat bread every day often have those weird deposits of fat
that aren't supposed to be there. Bread is just one of those
examples: after eating bread your body refuses to burn fat so you
get that strange accumulation of fat while feeling hungry at the
Yeah yeah, it is not much of a miracle as why
the food industry promotes bread: if you cannot burn your body fat
you will get hungry much faster.
And that my dear reader is the way it works
in a capitalist system. Not that I am against the principle of capitalist
economies, but people often think the food industry will never
sell poison if they get an extra profit from that.
These people are dumb & deserve to die
before their time.
By the way; the gossip is: Has Amy stopped
End of this update.
(16 March 2015) Two items today; the first
about a remark the Russian prez Vladimir Putin made & the
second item is a teaser picture related to the most famous math
problem around: the zeta function hypothesis.
Item 1) Russia was willing to go nuclear over
Item 2) Teaser picture on the Riemann conjecture.
Item 1) Russia was
willing to go nuclear over Crimea.
The last days it was more or less in the
media that Vladimir Putin had said that in the end the Russians
would be willing to go nuclear over the Crimea thing.
That looks a bit over the top, but now one
year later what is the outcome of this all?
Only 5000 to 6000 casualties while at present
date we can hope the truce will stand.
As a comparison, 5000 is only 2% of, for
example, the Syrian equation.
So can we learn a lesson from this?
Yes we can; it shows that symmetric warfare
is better compared to asymmetric warfare. My original estimations
from the day the Ukrainian prez Viktor disappeared were about 100
times as high.
From the War Tribunal point of view: I thank
the Russians for their efforts.
Despite all that weird international sanction stuff, facts are
that when push comes to shove, the Russians act clever. So
Item 2) Teaser
picture on the Riemann conjecture.
A very different item compared to item number
one; lately I have been working on stuff that could help computer
programmers to find the zero's of the zeta function in higher
For the last 100+ years finding proof that
the zero's of the Riemann zeta function are on some critical line
seems to be the most famous math problem around.
And I have to admit; it is very hard to
I too cannot do this; for example I have no
clue whatsoever about how to give pure analytical expressions for
those zero's. All we can do is the computer dance, but oh oh I am
the most worse computer programmer in the world.
Anyway, over the centuries this problem will
be cracked further and with that in mind it would not be a bad
thing if this problem would be looked upon in higher dimensions
and not only the the two dimensions of the complex plane...
Let's leave it with that, in this teaser
picture I try to show the similarity between calculations inside
the complex plane and the same calculation in 3D.
Here is the teaser picture:
The above calculation is only related to the
alternating sums of Riemann zeta stuff, that is known as the
Dirichlet eta function. More info on that via:
(14 March 2015) I am humming with
satisfaction because all the time I thought that you can only
develop Alzheimer disease if you eat bread on a daily
Well now there are some folks that say
Alzheimer disease, or dementia, is just another type of diabetes
and now it has number 3.
Item 1) Is Alzheimer disease really diabetes
Item 1) Is Alzheimer
disease really diabetes 3?
Alzheimer disease is a horrible way to die.
Only humans have it, in the animal kingdom no other species have
this disease. Therefore it is logical that Alzheimer disease is
related to food because animals don't eat processed foods and we
humans do eat processed foods.
Why do I think bread is the main
Very simple: most of our elderly do not eat
snickers or other forms of candy all day long, but they strongly
believe in the health of bread. Preferably whole wheat bread is
healthy is what the average elderly thinks...
That is one 100% nonsense; bread kills in
more ways than you can imagine.
Over twenty years back I had an accident in
traffic and one of my arms got out of the armpit. It never healed,
my arm always stayed weak year in year out.
Only now when I stopped eating weird stuff
like bread, the joints are finally as what they were supposed to
Back to Alzheimers:
I am to lazy to explain in detail why bread
is the main culprit, but everybody can do the google thing and
search for "diabetes type 3".
End of this update, do the google thing or
eat more bread. It is your life and not mine...
For the Dutch: Op npowetenschap.nl is wel een
leuke documentaire te vinden van 35 minuten over dit onderwerp.
Het is belangrijk op te merken dat de samenstellers van deze
documentaire niet veel van voedsel begrijpen omdat ze steeds weer
praten over 'suiker samen met vet'. Maar goed, geen gemopper meer,
hier is de link
type 3: Alzheimer
(11 March 2015) Today I posted an appendix in
both versions of the pdf file under the name 'Ten styles for
After all that Raabe formulae is to good to be neglected; in a
fundamental way the gamma function is all about multiplication and
that is why it fits so perfectly into the theory of product
Item 1) The two versions of the 'Ten styles
of product integration'.
Item 1) The two
versions of the 'Ten styles of product integration'.
The old version is Product_integrals.pdf
and later when I finally could import additional packages for my
math typing program I could use the curly product symbol as made
by Richard Gill.
That is Product_integrals_curly.pdf.
For the reminder of this update I only would
like to repeat the shortest possible advertisement for 3D complex
numbers. One way or the other it is fantastic to observe the most
weird things in our universe behave like the set of not-invertible
Professional math people always avoid such
stuff and always instantly go to things they call 'fields'. In a
finite dimensional field there is only one element (or number)
that is not invertible and that is the zero.
Why they do that is unknown to me, after all
if you need some math for example for quantum physics, all that
field stuff is rather weird math to apply.
It is like making a car with only square parts while everybody
knows square wheels give a bad ride all of the time...
This is amazing but the accretion disk is the
tau calculus and those two beams that shoot our perpendicular is
the number alpha. Furthermore with 3D complex numbers you can
craft super-position of 3 independent quantum states.
So from the very small to the largest objects in the universe; the
3D numbers are a perfect fit.
That also explains as why professional math
professors do not talk about it; progress in science without big
bucks is a taboo. Or am I now to negative on those sleaze
Till updates my dear reader.
(10 March 2015) Ha, this is funny; yesterday
a few political shuffles were done. The minister of justice lost
his job because he had told untrue facts to the Dutch parliament
and with that also the deputy of our minister of justice had to
Both are from a political party under the
local name of VVD; in our political landscape these are rightwing
liberals. But I do not care one second about minister Opstelten
that has lost his job; like a lion I will chase minister Kamp from
the economical department because that guy is a total retard when
it comes to our local gas mining problems....
After having said that, the positive news of
today is that after about 175 years of wall to wall stupidity by
math professors I can repair a bit of the damage done by worthless
math professors. That is the item for today.
Item 1) Finally after about 175 years the
result is used as it should be.
Item 1) Finally after
about 175 years the result is used as it should be.
Oh oh, product integration once more but what
If you are a student of math or physics or
chemistry or whatever exact science, you can always ask your math
professor the next simple question:
"Dear professor, you always talk about
those integrals but these integrals only add stuff up. They only
Now is there a way to replace addition with multiplication my dear
Of course the average math professor will
deny in a loud voice that this is not possible except using math techniques
that dumb students will not understand in a thousand
But, ha ha ha, when I found the result of Mr.
Raabe from about 175 years ago (Raabe was a math professor in
those long lost years) I decided to honor his magnificent result.
This 'honor' is the small formulae in the right-down corner of the
Source of the Raabe formulae:
End of this update (but do not forget to slaughter
the career of minister Kamp from the department of economical
affairs, the story simply needs another
(05 March 2015) I finished the update on the
gamma function in 3D. Here
it is or click on the teaser picture from 27 Feb below. Till
(04 March 2015) A short update in Dutch about
our weak and dumb minister of economical affairs Henk Kamp. Here
Item 1) Ja hoor, daar is meneertje slap gelul
Item 1) Ja hoor, daar
is meneertje slap gelul weer.
Eeuwig en altijd moet meneertje slap gelul
weer advies hebben van 'experts'.
Nou ja, eigenlijk ben ik blij dat Henk het zelf nog eens een
keertje zegt want daarmee hebben we direct een fundamenteel bewijs
dat meneertje slap gelul echt helemaal niets van de gaswinning
Anderhalf jaar terug heb ik voorgerekend dat
de Groninger bodem over de volle breedte van ongeveer 900
vierkante kilometer minstens 3 meter zal dalen.
Echter, ik baseerde mijn berekenig op gas dat
dan van 5 kilometer diep zou komen, in werkelijkheid komt het
meeste gas van ongeveer 2600 meter diep en omdat de druk daar maar
de helft is zal het gas veel meer volume innemen.
Dientengevolge zal de totale bodem daling uitkomen op ongeveer 6
meter, maar dat is een gemiddelde omdat het gasveld niet helemaal
Als we rekening houden met de hogere temperatuur op 2600 meter
diepte dan is 6 meter nog te laag geschat...
Nou en als je dan bedenkt wat dat voor
gevolgen heeft voor de dijken, de kanalen, de sluizen etc etc dan
ben ik benieuwd wat de regering zal gaan doen.
Nou ja, helemaal niets; dit jaar nog steeds
ongeveer 40 kubieke kilometer gas en Henk Kamp, randdebiel als hij
blijkbaar is, heeft steeds meer adviezen nodig van steeds meer
Het beste zou zijn, en dat meen ik, dat
iemand Henk gewoon een doodschop geeft zodat wij met een nieuwe
minister van economisch zaken verder kunnen.
Zijn we ook eens van dat slap gelul af...
Kijk in het landschap hier duiken er steeds
meer huizen op die er zo uitzien. En dit is in wezen nog maar het
begin. Maar er zijn meer minkukels dan Kamp; ook het KNMI dat
altijd zegt hoeveel het deze keer weer was op de schaal van
Richter zegt niets over schattingen over de totale bodemdaling.
Waarom dat is weet ik niet; blijkbaar wil
iedereen graag de wiskunde prof uithangen:
laf en zwijgzaam.
Einde van deze update; till updates.
(27 Feb 2015) Oh oh, why did I do that?
Item 1) Oops I broke the math embargo!
Item 1) Oops I broke
the math embargo!
A few days back I finished a nine page long
update under the title Punishment
for funny math professors but on page 10 I more or less
started bragging that I think that a particular set of zero's is
also found in 3D.
May be you have never heard of it; but it is
more or less the most famous problem in mathematics. It is easy to
understand and hopeless to prove.
It is called the Riemann conjecture (things that are unproven are
often called conjectures).
Well I did it myself, just like a few weeks
back I accidentally broke the beer glass I have been using on a
daily basis for over 35 years...
Anyway one thing leads to another and I had
to post even two appendices to comment on why I think that stuff
on the Riemann hypothesis.
But ok, I did it myself so I won't complain;
I should have thought twice because of course I want to keep my
advantage at the worldwide mathematical community as large as
This week I finished a short piece on the so
called gamma function in 3D.
Never heard of the gamma function? Here is a
good starter (and take at least one week to let it sink in):
And completely unrelated to the gamma
function but more to math updates before that, a wiki upon Hermann
Günther Grassmann who got his math work completely neglected for
over two decades by incompetent so called 'professional math
Sounds pretty familiar over here. The
difference between Hermann and I is that Hermann lost all interest
in math while I already 25 years back understood I was surrounded
But once you have a good math idea,
regardless of the incompetent math professors, these days we still
have Hermann's optical law:
Ok, end of this update & as usual: till
(21 Feb 2015) According to the theory of
quantum physics, for a short time nature can borrow a bit of
energy and create a particle with that. The heavier the particle,
the more energy has to be borrowed and the shorter the particle
Item 1) Punishment for funny math
Punishment for funny math professors.
That process of particles jumping in and out
of existence bears a great similarity with how the brains of math
professors work; but instead of borrowing energy the brains of
math professors borrow consciousness and they use that to craft
So inside the brain of math professors, all
the time mathematical ideas pop in and out of existence. If a
mathematical idea is relatively complicated, it will survive only
a very short time.
Sometimes, and this is a very seldom thing, the mathematical idea
get stored into the memory of the brain of a math professor;
although the original idea has popped out of existence, a copy of
that idea is stored in the memory.
A lot is known about the brains of math
professors; for example it is flat and squared and very small;
just a few millimeters across. Biologists have a theory that says
the brain of math professors is flat because of the use of 2D
complex numbers and that the use of 2D complex numbers also
explains as why the brains of math professors have stopped
evolving so very long ago.
If you cut the skull of a math professor open
with an axe, precisely in the middle of the head you can find that
tiny tiny brain. Under the microscope it looks something like
The white parts is where a math idea has
popped out of existence and the shadowy parts is where with the
help of borrowed conscience a mathematical idea has popped into
Sometimes an idea gets stored in the memory
of the brains of that particular math professor; for example the
idea that you can take the cross product of a scalar and a 3D
vector could, in theory anyway, get stored into the memory.
If that happens, the brain of the math
professor will look like this:
It is well known that math professors always
write publications but why they do that is less well understood.
Ok, we can infer from this activity that math professors can
actually read and write, but why they write stuff nobody else
wants to read is unknown.
Biologists think that writing so called
publications has to do with territorial instincts and that writing
publications is a way of marking off the particular
But the problem with that is just like dogs that when they take a
shit, they align themselves with the earth magnetic field. From
that we can infer that dogs have a biological compass but we do
not know why dogs align to the earth magnetic field while taking a
Anyway to make a long story short: If a
professional professor in math publishes something that was stored
in the memory, it looks something like this:
Now serious: What is the punishment for the
Nottingham math professors?
In a few days time I will update about 10 new
pages with more or less the net content:
1) The cross product in 3D and 4D.
2) In 3D and 5D we form pairs of imaginary
numbers that imitate the number i from the complex plane.
The punishment is as next:
The Nottingham professors must investigate if in 3D there are
non-trivial zero's of the famous Riemann zeta function.
And the Youtube video from the channel
Numberphile that started it all (once more):
End of this update. Till updates.
(13 Feb 2015) Today I finished updating the
electricity update and because it is now the year 2015 I opened page
3 from the primer on three dimensional complex numbers.
Item 1) Three phase electricity and three
dimensional circular numbers.
Item 1) Three phase
electricity and three dimensional circular numbers.
This update contains no new math, on the
contrary: the goal is to illustrate that you can use higher
dimensional complex & circular in any way you like.
For example the most difficult math I used
was only this:
In another development today when I rode my
bicycle a bit around the local landscape, I suddenly realized that
these math professors from Nottingham are completely wrong.
Look in the previous update from yesterday
for the details, but you can easily in three dimensions cross a
scalar with a vector.
Once more we observe how dumb all those math
professors become when they year in year out refuse to study
higher dimensional complex numbers. In a few months time I have
published about the stuff for 3 full years.
From that relatively long timespan you can
deduce how smart those people from the universities really
(12 Feb 2015) The UK based university of
Nottingham has a nice channel named Numberphile on Youtube; on a
regular basis they post videos for a wider audience. \\
In general it is very nice but lately I came
across a horrible video where these evil monsters poked fun at my
3D number systems...
This cannot be, I will protect my little baby numbers with all my
Item 1) Punishment for funny math professors.
Item 1) Punishment
for funny math professors.
First look at the root source of all evil in
The accumulation of pure evil is at about 5
mins into the video.
Ok ok, may be it is not pure evil but total ignorance.
And we must never forget what Jesus said:
Blessed are those with the simple minds.
So the Nottingham university professors are,
just like the professors here in Groningen, extremely blessed!
What more could they wish for?
Ok ok, let me give the Nottingham people a
In the first problem, one of the factors is (x + y + z) so if you
factor that out from
x^3 + y^3 + z^3 - 3xyz you can prove it is zero.
For the second problem I do not know any
method that does not use 3D numbers...
Or, may be it is just the same as (x + y + z)^3.
(Yes, that is true but the expression itself comes from the third
power of a 3D number.)
That's it for this update, till
(09 Feb 2015) Today I finished a small 6 to 7
page long piece on 3 phase electricity using 3D complex or
circular numbers. And I am considering publishing it because:
1) It contains no new math &
2) It is important to show you can use these higher dimensional
numbers in all sciences that use advanced mathematics.
There is absolutely no reason to stick to the
complex plane only (like the weird behaving professional math
Yet today's update is the smallest
advertisement possible for 3D complex numbers:
Item 1) A math model for black holes.
Item 1) A math model
for black holes.
The 'math model' is as simple as possible:
Take the 3D complex or the circular numbers, use the set of
non-invertible numbers to mimic the accreditation disk and the
beams going out.
It looks like this:
End of the advertisement.
Yeah yeah, there will be no mercy for the
incompetent so called 'professional' professors from the science
The way black holes are structured is exactly
the same as non-invertible numbers in three dimensions...
The similarities are striking: mass that gets
sucked in to the accreditation disk is indeed 'no longer
invertible' and the other way around:
Once you are on the main axis of invertible numbers (the multiples
of the number alpha), you will never leave that axis.
(The last statement is not true when you can
use addition, for example 1 + alpha is perfectly invertible. But
let me spare you the technical side of stuff; all in all these
black holes look just like the space of non-invertibles...)
End of this update, till updates.
(08 Feb 2015) A small update on quantum
mechanics because after all those people from the overpaid math
professors at the universities can only add up two quantum states
into a so called superposition of independent quantum
Once more I say that for three quantum states
you need 3D complex numbers...
Item 1) Roger Penrose on Schrödingers cat
and stuff like that.
Item 1) Roger Penrose
on Schrödingers cat and stuff like that.
In a relatively old Youtube vid from the year
2003 I found Roger Penrose using a so called overhead projector.
Teens very likely have not seen much overhead projectors but the
origin goes back to the cave people who sitting in their cave at
night used the light from the wood fire to project shadows on the
Ok, when it comes to the so called
superposition of quantum states, the math is hard.
With 2D numbers from the complex plane you can only add two of
such quantum states.
And there is that stuff known as 'phase
shift' that says you can in a continuous way shift from one state
into the other (as long as there is no observer from the
macroscopic world watching).
But Roger knows his stuff, here is a
screenshot from that 2003 video, at about 11 min 36 seconds Roger
shows this overhead projection to the audience:
Do you see the w and z?
You see Roger has put them perpendicular
because the two quantum states are independent. And that is where
the present day science of quantum mechanics run into serious
They cannot superposition more than two
quantum states because they only use 2D complex numbers...
Roger Penrose on Quantum Mechanics and Schrodinger's cat
End of this update, till updates.
(04 Feb 2015) A small food update that might
explain a little bit why the brains of humans are so large
compared to the other apes.
Item 1) What happened to gene MYH16?
Item 1) What happened
to gene MYH16?
Often it is stated that chimpanzees are our
closest relative in the animal kingdom; and indeed we share a very
large pool of identical genes. But why are the brains of chimps so
small compared to the apes named humans?
Is that because our jaw muscles are so weak
that for example your brain can grow and grow until you are an
adult? (The weak jaw muscles allow your skull to be much more
loose, this in contrast to chimps that do not have this
Brain size of a chimp is at most something
like half a liter while human brains are about three times as
large. That's a big time difference...
(But sperm whales seem to have the largest brains, about 8 kg or
five times the human brain. Beside actual brain size you also have
to take into account the ratio between brain size and body size
because a large body needs more brain to control it.)
Now a long long time ago people started
cooking their food to the extent that at present day people can no
longer eat raw meat like the meat from cows or so.
And that seems to be related to gene
In addition, the scientists discovered that mutations deactivated the gene MYH16, which is linked to jaw muscles, after the ancestors of chimpanzees and hominins diverged, but before the ancestors of modern humans split from those of Neanderthals and Denisovans. This may explain why modern and extinct human lineages have relatively weak jaw muscles compared with ape relatives such as chimpanzees. The researchers suggested that this gene loss may have occurred after the development of cooking, which can make food easier to eat, lessening the need for stronger jaw muscles.
Comment: If true, cooking food allows for the
gene MYH16 to get razed from the gene pool allowing for bigger
brains while at the same time you need some brains to get the fire
going... If you look at humanity today, I think it is all
Source: Different Tastes: How Our Human Ancestors' Diets Evolved
So that explains a little bit why we eat the
food we do, only that bread keeps on going to be a strange thing.
But all animal species will have their own blind spot when it
comes to food, after all nature wants you to die as soon as
possible so nature can proceed with her experiments on
End of this update.
(30 Jan 2015) Yesterday I hang a short pdf
file in this website about so called Clifford algebras. Clifford
algebras are famous because of their role in the science of
Embargo considerations: I have done a lot of
work lately, so you can be assured that these new Clifford
algebras fall deep behind the 10% threshold of new stuff
Item 1) A teaser picture for some cheap math
with two fingers in the nose written.
Item 1) A teaser
picture for some cheap math with two fingers in the nose
Yes, let's not do difficult: Any mathematical
lightweight human could write cheap stuff like this. So for me it
was important to show that I can be just a non-performer of math
just like the professional math professors are.
All these precious professional professors do
is producing pseudo science, and miracle miracle they get
boatloads of money for that pseudo science.
Now, I can make pseudo science too...
Don't believe me?
Just click on the next picture and you will
know that whatever the future of humans will bring, it is
End of this update, but once more I am glad I
can write useless knowledge too...
(23 Jan 2015) A short update on the European
Central Bank new policy of buying 60 billion € a month in
Item 1) Has the ECB gone bonkers?
Item 1) Has the ECB
I did not see the press conference today but
in the intro ECB prez Mario Draghi clearly stated that as far as
the ECB is concerned, they will lay the foundation for future
Mario clearly stated that without political
help like transforming your economy this massive bond buying
program will not work.
Furthermore, and that is very important, if
government bonds are bought, 80% of the risk goes to the local
Central Bank of that country and 20% will rest on the shoulders of
What can I say?
Not much; I think that this all is not going
to work because the problem countries like France and Italy will
never ever make the changes needed.
Politics in countries is never driven by
economical or mathematical insights, most of it is only local
As we observe on inspection; an unemployment
rate of 25% in Spain does not trigger any political reform at
But as a mathematical dynamic system it will
be funny to observe local Central Bank pump up their balances with
local government bonds.... What will happen to future losses on
those local Central Bank balances?
The USA & the Japs are already in dire straits...
When will debt huggers learn the math?
End of this update, till updates.
(17 Jan 2015) A small math update with one of
those 'numerical proofs'.
Of course these are not real proofs, but anyway.
I respect the embargo because time in and again I have stated the
determinants of exponential circles & curves is 1. So there is
nothing new under the sun...
Item 1) Don't worry; there is nothing new
under the sun.
Item 1) Don't worry;
there is nothing new under the sun.
One picture with some words in it:
The 'animated drawing' applet can be found
End of this update, till updates.
(14 Jan 2015) Finally I printed it all out;
225 pages printed while on this website only about 140 pages of
math around higher dimensional complex numbers are found...
So the embargo is gathering some beef; a lot
of stuff will never get published.
Item 1) The publication embargo is gathering
Item 1) The
publication embargo is gathering beef.
Finally on the last day of the year 2014 I
went to the printing shop and printed it all out.
And for only 12 € I had the very first version in my hands,
although I had written it all myself even for me it was more or
less impressing what is inside it.
The 225 page long pdf print contains only one
picture, in the 140 pages on this website a whole lot of pictures
from outside sources are included. So I am very satisfied with how
the boycott of new results is going.
This is how it looks in print, just 12 €
and it will be the only copy forever.
Yeah, only one copy forever.
After all the professional math professors do
their thing and I know from experience that if you want to find
better math you avoid these people like they have the pest.
And they have the pest, they can only do 2D
End of this update, till
(12 Jan 2015) This is a small math update in
the Dutch language; the accountancy firm Deloitte is arguing for
more investments into the math departments of the Dutch universities.
Needless to say I am against giving more money to people that have
a solid track record of being incompetent to the bone.
Even if you give them boatloads of math for
free, they do not respond.
So will giving them much more money be good for the Dutch economy
in the long run?
Here is the item in the Dutch language:
Item 1) Volgens Deloitte is wiskunde goed
voor 160 miljard per jaar.
Item 1) Volgens
Deloitte is wiskunde goed voor 160 miljard per jaar.
Om de gedachten even scherp te zetten is het
verstandig om eerst de advertentie van Deloitte lezen want alle
details die erin zitten lijken op het eerste gezicht logisch.
Dus hier is de link naar de advertentie van
Wiskunde nodig om arbeidsmarkt te redden
Wiskunde verdient jaarlijks 160 miljard voor Nederland BV
Ik zal niet ontkennen dat met het juiste
gebruik van wiskund de economishe groei voor vele decennia
gewaarbgorgd is, maar dan moet je wel een zootje competente
wiskundigen klaar hebben staan natuurlijk.
Vergelijk het met een pan perfecte soep: Als
in die pan soep ongeveer 10 gram zout nodig is om de smaak en
voedingswaarde perfect te krijgen, kun je dan zeggen
"Tien gram zout geeft een pan gezonde
Dat is onzin omdat behalve het zout je
allerlei andere grondstoffen nodig hebt.
Laat ik een ander voorbeeld geven:
Een belangrijk deel van de huidige wiskunde
is gebaseerd op het gebruik van complexe getallen uit het complexe
vlak. En een belangrijk deel van onze economie is gebaseerd op
inzichten daaruit, bijv electriciteit.
Nou komt er een wiskunde student voorbij die
vertelt hoe je vanuit dat complexe vlak naar de hogere dimensies
kunt gaan en wat denk je dat die professor mafketels doen?
Nul komma niks.
En deze wiskunde is op termijn veel meer
waard dan 160 miljard per jaar.
Conclusie: Omdat in de jaren 1990 - 1992 de
wiskunde professoren al veel te veel geld kregen voor hun
prestaties waren ze veel te veel met geld bezig.
Laat je ze wiskunde zien dat echt een beetje
helpt, dan zien ze de lange termijn waarde niet want ze zijn bezig
met hun geldje enzo.
Daarom is mijn advies veel minder geld naar
die mafketels van die belastinggeld betaalde wiskunde professoren...
End of this update & till
(09 Jan 2015) Ha ha, do you think I would
comment on the terror attack in Paris?
Come on, only twelve people dead. No time
will be wasted on that.
This is a food update and I would like to
give my well meant compliments to the USA based Food & Drug
Item 1) The FDA bans all use of trans fats in
Item 1) The FDA bans
all use of trans fats in food products.
Now what are trans fats? That is very simple:
to normal fats there are extra hydrogen added in the 'trans way'.
That makes these fats much more stable and prolongs the shelf life
of food products where trans fats are added to.
But very likely, because the shelf live is
larger, your body has all kinds of troubles with digesting
Just a few examples: Doritos potato chips or
the halverine spread for your bread contains a lot of trans fats.
Therefore after five years if you open your healthy halverine
spread or after 50 years you open your healthy Dorito potato
chips, it is still perfectly edible.
Since it is my opinion that you should avoid
eating stuff your body cannot digest, it is not unwise to avoid
processed food that contains trans fats.
So I was flabbergasted to observe the USA
based FDA banning all use of trans fats anyway.
In the meantime we have about 30 million
Americans that have diabetes type two, that is about 10% of the
entire population. And that relates to hundreds of extra amputees
for the lower of the patients legs day in day out.
If you compare that to the weird stuff
related to the Paris attack, who is the crazy one?
Day in day out the food kills, it starts at
End of this update.
07 Jan 2015) A short food update upon
havermout or as it is known in the English language, the
Item 1) Feed the kids oatmeal, not bread, and
they will live longer.
Item 1) Feed the kids
oatmeal, not bread, and they will live longer.
This is a very simplistic title because our
bodies have thousands of genes containing the information for
producing specific proteins to build your body. So in theory there
can be many food allergies because of your genetic constellation
but in practice a lot of food allergies and/or food intolerances
are related to dangerous grains like wheat.
Oatmeal does not fall in the category that
shortens your lifespan without reason.
The other grains always interfere with your
blood sugar levels in a way that only makes your body gain more
and more fat while you cannot burn your fat away even if you
The grains are unwise food, but when you are young you don't drop
dead from it.
For myself speaking I classify oatmeal as a
fast food because I consume it with milk and a little bit of
sugar. And indeed since it is a fast food you can run faster or
get a higher average speed on your bicycle.
But oatmeal is much more safe because you do not gain weight from
eating it, contrary to bread, wheat, corn & the likes, the
fast food dimension is much more related to the milk and the five
grams of refined sugar that comes with it.
What about milk?
My body processes milk perfectly, but for most of humanity this is
not the case.
Now why should oatmeal be an allowed food?
Make up your own mind, I did not read the fine details but the
Bowl of Oatmeal a Day May Be Key to a Longer Life, Major Study Finds
In case you want to know why oatmeal is not a
Very simple: It does not break down into sugars within a few
minutes after passing your stomach & entering your
(28 Dec 2014) A short math update in the so
called 'Gauss style'.
Item 1) A short math update in the so called
Item 1) A short math
update in the so called 'Gauss style'.
After Euler the Gauss guy is definitely on my
shortlist of good guys.
A major reason for this is that it is estimated that because Gauss
never published a lot of work the whole of science was set back by
something like 50 years.
I think that is a rubbish estimate, would
Gauss have published in time because of the sheer incompetence of
other professional math professors, science would also be set back
for 50 years.
So Gauss was completely in the right with his
'few but ripe' policy of publicizing things.
After having said that, there are also strong
differences between me and Gauss. For example I usually think that
transparency is very important and that costs me an awful lot of
time to get it right.
For example the proof that in 3D the
exponential circles are indeed flat circles; outlining the proof
was about 25 to 30 seconds. Writing it all down and hitting the
button named 'publish website' is like 6 to 8 hours of work.
People often complained that Gauss lacked
transparency, he just stated results.
Gauss compared it to for example the restoration of a building;
all the time there is all that scaffolding around and when it is
finished the scaffolding is removed.
So today, with a little smile on my face, the
embargo forces me to not publish the 100% transparent pages and
only the end result.
It is a bit like going 'Gauss style'. Here is
the end result:
So my dear professional professors, can you
prove with your own theories if this is true or not?
Let's leave it with this, till updates. Updated
on 05 Jan 2015:
Ok, let's hope that at least a few amongst
you have wondered what the hell the 'A' is in
A = B and A = C implies B = C.
Well that is in the picture below: It is the first coordinate
function from the exponential circle, but it is run at 3 times the
You can break down the formulae with the
sin(9x)/(3sin(3x)) using the de Moivre formulae in the complex
plane, that gives the B.
You can also do this in the three dimensional complex numbers,
that gives the C.
Because it does not matter what kind of
complex numbers you use (the 2D complex plane or the 3D complex
space) this indicates that my way of generalizing the complex
plane to all higher dimensions is indeed valid.
Not that the mathematical 'professionals' are
interested, those people are so incompetent they cannot even
distinguish between a left and a right shoe or so...
But for me this is important because the higher dimensional number
systems are not some freak show but the only way to generalize the
And what the professional professors think or
say is 100% irrelevant.
By the way; I wish you a happy new year &
(26 Dec 2014) This is a short food update in
the Dutch language.
Item 1) Daar zijn die imbicielen weer van het
Item 1) Daar zijn die
imbicielen weer van het Voedingscentrum.
Ach tja 'eerlijk over voedsel' en dan zo'n
dike laag aan nonsense gaat mij te ver.
Het kan dus wel tweede kerstdag zijn maar ik wil even kort ageren
tegen die idioten genaamd Eddy Zoëy en een snol genaamd Jenneke
Zij geven voorlichting over het gluten in
brood op de website van het Voedingscentrum.
Nou ik wil kort zijn maar ze hebben in hun
update bij het voedingscentrum maar één detail echt goed:
Als er meer gluten in het brooddeeg zit dan
is het soepeler en meer elastisch.
Al het andere, daar klopt nul komma niets
Lees die rotzooi eerst maar eens door:
zijn slecht voor me denk ik
Niks maar dan ook niks klopt van deze vreemde
bizarre denkwereld; hooguit 1% gaat extra vroeg dood als ze brood
blijven eten vanwege koeliakki?
Snapt snol Jenneke & pooier Eddy wel
waarom zoveel mensen rugklachten hebben?
Ok ok, van een auto ongeluk kan je ook
Maar alleen als je dat gezonde brood eet dag
in dag uit blijven die rugklachten bij je voor de rest van je
En al die omatjes die een nieuwe heup moeten
hebben? Allemaal broodeters.
Ga je naar de dokter met gewrichts klachten
en je vraagt: Heb ik misschien reuma?
Dokter zegt: Nee hoor, reuma begint bij je handen en polsen.
Maar waarom kan ik mijn teen niet meer bewegen dokter? Het
gewricht is stuk!
Dokter zegt: Geen idee.
Laten we het daarbij houden, maar heb je
regelmatig last van je gewrichten dan zal alleen een wiskunde
professor niet proberen om gewoon eens een tijdje te stoppen met
brood en al die andere tarwe producten...
Tot opdatums, till updates.
(21 Dec 2014) Because in a few days time I
will have a new computer I thought why not upgrade my math type
setting stuff to the present Miktex2.9?
Of course I had to prove it once more:
On my computer it is impossible to include pictures in your math
To my surprise a true miracle happened: Not
only after a few faults I was able to get one picture on a correct
spot, on top of that even after making a pdf from it the output
still looked the same!
That sure was a miracle & that is item
number one for today:
Item 1) The Christmas miracle is there!
Item 1) The Christmas
miracle is there!
It is unbelievable but all those years in the
past it was always the so called 'encapsulated postscript' or the
eps extension that never worked. Jpg pictures worked better but
also too unreliable.
And now suddenly at least one picture is in
the correct place, in the meantime I also discovered a new species
of math professors:
It is a true miracle; not only is the picture
placed there where it is supposed to be (at the top of my 222 page
long main article). But also this new species of math professors
are looking very high IQ compared to the human variant that is
only wasting tax payer money.
I am humming with satisfaction...
Now why did I go to that website
That is because I was looking at one of those
video's that try to popularize quantum mechanics and I stumbled on
a nice vid from the Imperial College London where they use alcohol
to visualize muons in public places. And that too is a
Quantum theory: it's unreal
Many aspect of quantum physics look unreal,
for example that entanglement stuff where is there is large
spatial separation between entangled particles a measurement of
the one rams the other particle into the same quantum state.
Anyway, that is what they claim that happens
over and over again but I have never done such experiments
End of this update.
(16 Dec 2014) What did Hamilton do wrong when crafting the four dimensional
After all he tried to find 3D complex
Hamilton did about everything fault in trying to find 3D complex
numbers, in this short update of 3 pages we analyze from what
wrong assumptions he reasoned.
Click on the next picture to land on those 3
Further reading: Quaternion
End of this update.
(15 Dec 2014) This is a food update, we are
pondering the question if all calories are born equal. So the zero
hypothesis is that all calories are equal and it does not matter
what food you eat against the alternative that some kinds of food
are so that you will overeat & that you will die far to
Item 1) Are all food calories born
Item 1) Are all food
calories born equal?
Of course not all food calories are born
equal, after all my own father died when he was only 67 years of
age and with what I know now it was the bread and the wheat that
killed him prematurely.
I will not repeat the faults my parents made
so for me it is simple: If I die beyond the age of about 72 years,
in that case I stopped eating bread in time.
And compared to my previous generation, I
will have lived about five years longer.
Now are all food calories born equal?
Suppose there is food out that if you eat it,
your body will refuse to burn fat but you are not aware of
Does such food exist?
Yes, your puffy fluffy bread is such a
If you eat bread (or other food with all that high sugar index
stuff), after getting satisfaction for your calorie need, your
body refuses to burn fat.
Don't believe me?
Here is a simple graph of my own body weight,
all the time when I was eating bread I could not go below 88 kilo
of body mass. Even if on my bicycle I ride 500 kilometers week in
week out, my body refused to go below 88 kilo of body
Are all food calories born equal?
No they are not; in the next picture you see
my own body weight and you must know I came down from weighing an
amazing 109 kilo.
But I was not able to go below 88 kilo, still
staying in dangerous BMI index ranges.
Only with simply skipping bread I was able to
make it to what my goals actually were.
And now, every week again and again I have to
buy a few bags of nuts and overeat on my own terms.
And not on the terms of the food
End of this update, till updates.
(09 Dec 2014) A few updates back I joked a
bit like the entire of humanity need at least 265 years to find
only one exponential circle while I, Reinko, now publishes 10
So on my own I did about 2600 years of average mathematical
Now can I improve on those 2600 years?
Yes I can; there is a formulae from Abraham de Moivre that even
predates the first exponential circle as found by Leonhard Euler.
But during the last centuries professional math professors have
found two more, so until now they had only 3 of them.
Well, with every exponential circle/curve you
also have these Moivre formulaes.
I won't write them all out.
It is reasonable to add about 900 years improvement to the 2600
years, that gives a total of about 3500 years... ;)
Item 1) Abraham de Moivre formulae, 3D
Item 1) Abraham de
Moivre formulae, 3D version.
In case you do not know what the Moivre
formulae is, please study the next page first:
De Moivre's formula
From the historical point of view this Moivre
formulae is very important, for us living in the century number 21
it is hard to judge if Euler would have found the very first
exponential circle if he would have no knowledge at all about the
But history is not a repeatable process, we
can only guess and that's it.
In three dimensions I took the circular
multiplication and looked for the most simple Abraham de Moivre
formulae I could think of. Of course that would be the square of
the three coordinate functions of the exponential circle in 3D.
I made two versions of it, this is not an
official publication or so nor are they 'teaser pictures' for
impending publications. One way or the other; I have to obey the
embargo years until the university people finally start acting
And that my dear reader, could take a long
The two versions are precisely the same in
mathematical content, only the background is different. The first
one is named kitsch & the second has the name normal.
Here they are, this is the kitsch version
And precisely the same without any kitsch
parquet in it:
Don't forget: This is the most simple version
of de Moivre formulas it you leave the two dimensional complex
Let's leave it with that.
(05 Dec 2014) Another detail of the Direchlet
kernel in five dimensions, a small numerical proof from a detail
of the sphere-cone equation in 5D.
Item 1) Diving in 5D with help of the
Item 1) Diving in 5D
with help of the Dirichlet kernel.
Ha ha, never in my life I would have thought
this Dirichlet kernel would carry so much importance, but for the
time being I am humming with satisfaction because it looks like
this particular kernel fits a lot of exponential circles &
To be a bit more precise: They give me the
actual coordinate functions & and together with a little bit
of Floris Takens time delay musings it looks like I have found a
very good yet partial description of at least my theory
until dimension number five...
Today only a small numerical detail, of
course the math embargo is still out and until those weirdo's from
the local university here in Groningen act starting doing normal
the math embargo will be lifted.
Anyway, here is the numerical detail:
Never ever in my life I wrote an expression
so long that only says it is zero all of the time. All that sinus
stuff is only implementing the time delay from Floris while Reinko
says it should be zero.
Here is the numerical expression:
f_0 * f_1 + f_1 * f_2 + f_2 * f_3 + f_3
* f_4 + f_4 * f_0 =
Ha ha, anybody sees instantly this has to be
zero... Or not?
(03 Dec 2014) Correction: I wrote Diriclet in
the previous update where it should have been Dirichlet... Sorry
Now we have only one day of lifting the math
publication embargo with this Dirichlet stuff, why not dive in a
Item 1) Diving in 5D with the Dirichlet
Item 1) Diving in 5D
with the Dirichlet kernel.
To put it simple:
Now I understand the usage of the modified
Dirichlet kernel a little bit, computer proof that the sum of
squares of the coordinate functions equals 1 is easy
Just like the fact that the sum of the coordinates is also
Ha ha ha, this time around there is no mercy
for the weird behavior of the local math professors here in
Groningen: I applied just a little bit of Florens Takens time
delay & as usual year in year out you will act like the
weirdo's you are.
But let's skip the emotional parts of my
brain & dive into the good cognitive parts.
The numerical parts of my insights are
easy to harvest, this picture clearly says the sum of squares of
the coordinates equals 1, just like the sum of the coordinates
How to turn this into good math? So not that
stupid computer proof math?
End of this update, till updates.
(29 Nov 2014) Ok ok, today I am in a good
mood so for one day the math embargo & boycott is
neglected. But it is only for one day...
Item 1) Holy shit; are coordinate functions
actually Dirichlet kernels? Why?
Item 1) Holy shit;
are coordinate functions actually Dirichlet kernels? Why?
Today I am in a good mood so I throw in an
open problem I cannot solve myself.
I do not have any kind of proof for it, but lots of times the
coordinate functions of exponential curves and stuff are a simple
transformation of the so called Diriclet kernel from Fourier
Why this is, I do not know.
Takens' theorem in action for the Lorenz chaotic attractor
Let's leave it with that, till updates.
(26 Nov 2014) I finished turning the math
text into 19 jpg pictures, so today the stuff can be published.
Take your time, do not try to understand all 19 pages in one
Item 1) Ten exponential circles and curves.
Item 1) Ten
exponential circles and curves.
Again, do absolutely not try to grasp
After all, it took me about one and a half year...
(25 Nov 2014) Today I finished turning the
impending update on exponential circles & curves into
internet-digestible jpg pictures; 19 of them.
So before I hang these 19 pictures in this
website, the last teaser picture is there.
And that is the only item of today:
Item 1) The last teaser picture.
Item 1) The last
This is the last teaser picture and in it I challenge
all those dumb so called 'professional math professors' that think
higher dimensional complex numbers do not exist.
How much more fundamental proof do you need
to understand humans are only a branch of primates, always having
a bad brain day and never ever we are echo's of God.
By the way, that goes for me too...
But here is the last teaser
before the hard math will strike in a few days of time.
End of this update, till updates.
(22 Nov 2014) The last years I always have
problems with the telephone; people who are supposed to contact me
cannot get through.
I have accepted that as a fact of life; you
might know I am not satisfied with math professors, but believe
me: compared to math professors the real utter slime is police
forces and stuff. Lately there are also more and more internet connection
problems, for example I cannot even download a small 3,1 MB
file from a company named Microsoft.
And that is where I draw a line in the sand,
the rest of this update is in the Dutch language.
Item 1) Waarom doet dat internet zo gek?
Item 1) Waarom doet dat
internet zo gek?
Kijk dat mijn telefoon afgetapt wordt door
die achterlijke politie, dat is iets waar ik al vele jaren mee
weet te leven. Bovendien is er ook nog zoiets als fiets en met
fiets kan je gewoon een handgeschrven briefje ergens heen brengen
als dat nodig is zonder telefoon te gebruiken.
Telefoon aftap is altijd makkelijk te
begrijpen; er zijn altijd veel te veel van die enorm rare fouten.
Bijv: Familielid maakt telefoontje, gesprek
is afgelopen en familielid hangt op.
Daarna gaat de telefoon dan 1 keer over.
Maak ik zelf telefoon gesprek en ik hang op,
dan nooit gaat ie nog 1 keer over.
En dat gaat dan rustig een maand of drie door
totdat ik er iets van zeg op deze webpagina... En verhelpen ze de
Conclusie: Achterlijke politie die op 21
oktober 2001 begon met mij te stalken is mijn telefoonlijn aan het
Recent in het jaar 2014 zijn er weer allerlei
telefoon problemen en omdat de laatste jaren onze minister Ronald
Plasterk constant staat te beweren in het parlement dat zoiets
altijd gaat met een ministeriële handtekening, heb ik een
probleem met Ronald.
Maar ook met Opstelten want die gaat over de politie enzo.
Kan dit soort van onzin eindelijk eens
Als je wat wilt weten gebruik dan de methode
genaamd 'deurbel' ipv altijd dat laffe gedoe als telefoon taps en
aanverwant laf gedrag...
Geloof je me niet dat het internet enorm raar
Hier is een eenvoudig screenshot bewijs dat ik niet eens 3 MB van
Microsoft kan downloaden:
Omdat onze mooie Ronald altijd van die mooie
kletspraatjes heeft in het parlement en omdat de AIVD onder zijn
bevoegdheid valt kan ik maar één ding zeggen tegen deze
Sterf Ronald Plasterk, STERF!!!
Maar goed, het kan ook een Opstelten probleem
Laten we het daarbij houden. Tot opdatums.
(19 Nov 2014) Today I finally finished my oversight
of exponential circles and curves. I restricted it to 10 because
otherwise I would clearly break my own embargo that
Only 10 to 20% of new results will be
published until those crazy math professors finally will act in an
adult way and not like inside the sandpit where small children
Item 1) The last teaser picture for the
exponential circles & curves.
Item 1) The last
teaser picture for the exponential circles & curves.
End of this update, till updates.
(16 Nov 2014) About one year ago on 08 Nov
2013 I wrote an update on 17-dimensional exponential circles. Now
ha ha ha , they do not exist at all.
So I crafted a small correction on that
particular update from about one year ago & that is the item
Item 1) Naming and shaming incompetent math
Item 1) Naming and
shaming incompetent math professors.
Yeah yeah Marius, you said it yourself:
Equations of Diophantus are more
So bye bye professor number one...
End of the start of the slaughter of math
(12 Nov 2014) From the previous update we had
an open problem; the solution to that open problem will be given
and a new open problem emerges.
Ha ha ha, that new problem is not easy to solve in six days or
Item 1) Leonhard Euler saves the day.
Item 1) Leonhard
Euler saves the day.
Ok, I did not set this up because when
writing an oversight of all inns and outs of exponential circles
and curves in low dimensions I finally had to tackle this
Let's not do difficult, the solution to the
open math problem lies in understanding projections & also
understanding as why in quantum mechanics all measurements are
So here is my solution to my open problem
from six days ago:
The last question is very philosophical.
(06 Nov 2014) One item with a mathematical
challenge to the entire global math community. I want a brain
proof done by a human brain without the use of a
Item 1) Musings on an open problem.
Item 1) Musings on
an open problem.
It has to be true because if not all my other
math work on higher dimensional complex numbers will come crashing
down hard and after that I would feel the need to commit suicide
or start eating bread again.
But leaving jokes aside, why is the next
problem that you see in the jpg picture below so hard to crack? My
brain cannot prove it with just my brain & a bit of old
fashioned paper & pencil.
An internet applet for the exponential matrix
gives (of course) the correct answer, but I refuse to bow for the
wisdom of machines. I just want to understand the math with my own
few pounds of human brain tissue...
The number 1.047198 you see is of course pi
divided by 3.
So this is the open problem:
How do you, as a human with only paper &
pencil, go from the 'entered square matrix' to the result?
Ok, every day I am making a little bit of
progress into my oversight of exponential curves and exponential
But this detail is still not solved in full
order for a human mind...
End of this update, till updates.
(of these homepage files).