(24 Oct 2016) Although it is a bit of narcism,
this update is upon two simple Google picture searches. The first
search is about 3D complex numbers and the second search is a
picture search of my own name Reinko Venema.
Item 1) Time evolution of two picture
Item 1) Time
evolution of two picture searches.
About a year ago I started a new website
so for me as the author of that website it was interesting to see
the evolution of Google searches when it came to topics related to
three dimensional complex numbers.
The last year I did post about 40 posts and
every now and then I checked the evolution as found on Google
pictures. There were many rises and falls of some pictures but one
picture when it began it's rise it only went up. For over half a
year a picture from a six dimensional space is always on top; it
was a post on a hybrid where I mixed the numbers from the complex
plane as we know it for centuries with my own invention of the 3D
A few pictures further in the Google search
there is always that Cauchy-Riemann equation stuff where I explain
how the hell Riemann wrote down the CR equation and math
professors should stop to write it down in that 'ant fucking
style' like they always do but instead use the 'chain rule style'
because that is mathematically superior...
As such the picture search on the Google
search engine is more or less very stable for many months on a
row. In the upper half of the next picture you see the results as
they are more or less month in month out:
The lower half of the picture above contains
search results number 1, 2 and 3 when you do a picture Google of
my name Reinko Venema.
I don't do that very often because I am not
very much preoccupied with day to day action like we have in the
media files. Beside that picture searches on the name Reinko
Venema always have some content related to the first decade on the
war on terror.
So people might get confused; is it math or
is it a evil terrorist???
But anyway, the three pictures from the lower
half of the picture above shows:
1) On the left a fragment of the top index
picture of this website,
2) A picture from some math question website that should be my
3) Victory: Poking fun at the PPP.
I just never expected to be a photo of the
experiment that shows that electrons get accelerated by magnetic
fields be on position number 3. Yeah yeah only electrons that are
the long sought magnetic monopoles can do that kind of behavior;
the official story of the professional physics professors that the
electron is a magnetic dipole on it's own is just not
Ok ok, the electron pair is indeed a magnetic
dipole and as such will obey the Gauss law of magnetism, but that
is another story and at the time being it is good to observe the
evolution of the Google picture search every few months or
Let's leave it with that. Till updates.
(14 Oct 2016) At last the update with reason
number 39 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles is finished.
That is our item of this update:
Item 1) The acceleration of the solar wind
Item 1) The
acceleration of the solar wind analyzed.
Last week I just did not understand why the
electron and proton temperature in the solar with was so different
from the stuff we know from fusion reaction here on earth. Later I
realized you should not view the sun as a down to earth short
lived plasma acceleration kind of stuff, the solar wind has gone
on from thousand of millions of years.
So you must view the solar wind as it is now
via how it likely has evolved.
Since electrons are much more accelerated by magnetic fields it
has to be that in the beginning of the formation of the solar wind
the fraction of electrons was much higher. Over time the sun
became more and more positively charged and that is more or less
the explanation for the present temperature of the electrons in
the solar wind.
Click on the picture to land on reason number
39 on the magnetism page:
Let me end this small update right now, till
(10 Oct 2016) Ha ha this is funny: only today
I found out that the Nobel prize in chemistry was awarded to three
people and one of those three is from the local university.
So although this is nice news, of course on
such a detail I will absolutely not change my own policies when it
comes to dealing with people from universities and other
institutions like that. Better avoid all contact will still be the
Our item for today is an imitation of the
Nobel prize in physics from this year:
Item 1) The Hendrik Casimir effect and the
Item 1) The Hendrik
Casimir effect and the vacuum catastrophe.
To make a long story short:
The energy stored inside a vacuum is about 10
to the power 120 less than as measured at present day. So where
does this discrepancy come from?
As usual it is the Gauss law for
Now you also understand as why it is still
important to keep a large distance between myself and those people
working at universities...
A long time ago a Dutch physics guy did some
experiments and from that we have the so called 'Hendrik Casimir
effect'. And Hendrik did his best and he tried to avoid all
possible attraction between the metal plates he used in his
At the time it was thought that electrons
were magnetic dipoles so there was no reason in this experimental
setup to correct for the fact they are not magnetic
But inside metals you have those free
electrons, they are not bound to nuclei but they can roam around
in freedom. And if you repeat the Casimir experiment again and
again of course you will find that cute attraction between two
Enough of the bla bla bla, click on the
picture below to land on reason number 38 as why electrons just
cannot be magnetic dipoles.
The vacuum catastrophe is the actual amount
of energy as it is stored in one cubic centimeter of vacuum. It is
only 10 to the power minus 8 and not the weird numbers as they
flow from experiments like done by Hendrik Casimir...
End of this update. Till updates.
(07 Oct 2016) I have added two more reasons
as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles, for these two reasons
go to the page
In a separate development I have selected
Albert Fert, the Nobel laureate in physics in the year 2007 as the
Item 1) Is Albert Fert really a perfect
Item 1) Is Albert
Fert really a perfect imbecile?
Albert Fert explaining electron spin in some
And I am wondering is this person a perfect imbecile yes or
The video is very short, it will take only
1.04 minutes or 64 seconds of your attention but within this
framework of just 64 seconds of time you have all these imbecile
1) The electron is actually spinning and that
makes it a tiny dipole magnet.
2) It has spatial quantum stuff.
My answer to this idiot explanation are very
1) Show me some experimental proof that there
is something spinning.
2) It has not spatial preference whatsoever, it only follows
magnetic field lines because it has magnetic charge.
Let's leave it with that.
Here is the picture of the 2007 Nobel
laureate in physics explaining electron spin:
For myself speaking: It is very hard to pack
more nonsense into 64 seconds as this guy does. From the
sociological point of view video's like this where 'important men
explain electron spin' always have the same characteristic:
It always lacks experimental proof that
electrons are actually magnetic dipoles...
It is always the same, it is only theoretical
blah blah blah and zero point zero experimental validation of this
particular blah blah blah.
Let's leave it with that. Till
(04 Oct 2016) Today the Nobel prize in
physics was announced and by sheer coincidence about one week ago
I did read for the first time about the quantum Hall effect. That
is item number 1, the second item is an addendum on the food
update from 29 August and now we fine-tune our calculations on
blood sugar caused by bread.
Item 1) Nobel prize stuff + lost photo found
Item 2) You eat two baguettes, what happens next?
Item 1) Nobel prize
stuff + lost photo found back.
Today's announcement of the Noble prize in
physics was not my first choice: I would have recommended the
gravity wave folks because that is a strong victory for the
experimental physics professors.
That would also have prevented Nobel prize money going to those
theoretical professional physics professors who think that
electrons are magnetic dipoles by definition.
So that is my take on it, yet of course it
has to be remarked that the quantum Hall effect is a truly amazing
thing and this quantum Hall effect is only a part of what those
weird states of matter can do. From that point of view I also
think the choice of the Nobel prize committee is very
On top of that, the oldest laureate was from
1934 or so and of course since the Nobel prize can only be given
to people that are actually alive, this might have weighed in
Yesterday I was lucky because I am recently
working on reason number 37 as why electrons are not magnetic
dipoles but magnetic monopoles and I found back that photo that
was made by Marcin Bialec.
The important feature of this photo is that
you see the beam of electrons spreading out into a broader sheet.
So it is spreading out in the direction of the magnetic field
lines and that is what I name the bonkers force:
This photo is perfect, from the very
beginning the beam of electrons starts spreading out into the
direction of the magnetic field lines...
That simply means there is acceleration into
the direction of the magnetic field lines and that is the bonkers
force. Why do I name it the bonkers force?
Very simple: It will make the professional
physics professors go bonkers.
So there in no denying this: If it makes the ppp go bonkers it
must be a very mighty force... ;)
Item 2) You eat two
baguettes, what happens next?
On the 29 of August I made a simple
estimation that said if you eat two baguettes that weigh about 200
gram you get a dose of about 15 times the total amount of sugar
that is in you bloodstream at any given time.
I did that easy estimation because I was
highly irritated by the sheer incompetence of the Dutch health
authorities when it comes to food: this is a collection of
imbeciles known as the Dutch Health Council.
Now back to our easy estimation: Blood sugar
readings during fasting are 90 100.
That means 90 to 100 milligram of glucose per deciliter blood.
That is a very difficult way of stating you have about 0.9 to 1.0
gram of glucose in your blood so in your entire bloodstream there
is about 5 gram of glucose in total.
My easy estimate was there would be about 80
grams of carbs in two baguettes.
In the next picture we once more have my beloved Australian
glycemic index that tells how your blood sugar levels react upon
eating particular kinds of food:
In the last column you see 'Carb per Serve'
and indeed if you multiply the serving size of 30 gram by a factor
of 7 you land on 200 grams of bread or two baguettes.
So my estimate was rather good, only eating
two baguettes gives your blood a nice blow of 15 times the amount
of glucose that is in it...
What happens to all that sugar in the blood?
Very simple: The most mighty hormone there is starts pumping in,
insulin enters the blood stream and tells your body on the
cellular level to go into glucose burning mood.
So all that excess glucose makes your body
run on glucose and the rest gets turned into body fat. Humans
cannot store blood sugar, we have never evolved that
But there is more: Because insulin spikes you
turn the bread into fat but later when the sugar high is gone you
need to burn the fat. Ha ha ha, your insulin levels are still far
to high so you cannot burn fat in the first place.
And that my dear reader is the stuff that
explains we have all those weird looking people with all those
excess fat on the weirdest of places...
(02 Oct 2016) Wow man the Russians have all
kinds of comments on the Dutch investigations on the downing of
flight MH17. But as I long long ago remarked, if they have nothing
to do with it they would not make all kinds of strange
So the advice to the Russians is: DRINK MORE
FUCKING VODKA AND KEEP YOUR MOUTH OPEN FOR THAT.
Ok, in the world of the grown ups I would
like to explain to you that the science of physics has gone
bonkers way beyond control and I only show you two easy to
understand Youtube videos by doing that.
Item 1) Why do physics professors talk the
talk they do?
Item 1) Why do
physics professors talk the talk they do?
Just two video's from the 'Breakthrough
physics prize' conventions as they have over there in the USA.
Both video's have nothing to do with smart and elaborate research
into important details like the explanation of the speed of the
solar wind, how do we explain diamagnetism that can elevate frogs
with a strong enough magnetic field etc etc.
No, we only get weirdo's like Leonard
Susskind and imbeciles like Nima Harkani-Hamed. You understand: I
myself, Reinko Venema, am not fishing to get the next
'breakthrough prize' in the science of physics...
Anyway, here are the two video's from two
physics professors that are sung loose from reality years and
Breakthrough prize in physics year 2014:
Susskind: 2014 Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics Symposium
Breakthrough prize in physics year 2016: Nima
Arkani-Hamed: 2016 Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics Symposium
In order to understand the nonsense that is
going round in the professional USA circles of so called
'professional physics professors' I only post one screen shot of
that weirdo Leonard Susskind. He is talking about black holes that
have lot's of wormholes to photons coming from Hawking radiation
coming from that same black hole.
There is not much experimental prove given,
but hey these are the 'theoretical physics professors' on their
top performance so who cares about actual experimental proof
And don't forget: The pay rise in salaries
these idiots have every year is what in the future is my entire
Who says these imbeciles should even get more
Let me leave this stuff by that, idiots
talking about black holes connected via wormholes to loose photons
is worthy of a 'breakthrough prize in physics' over there in the
USA... Till updates.
(16 Sept 2016) Two new reasons as why
electrons are magnetic monopoles, or at least carry a net magnetic
charge, were posted this week.
Our item of today is about reason 34 because that contains the
most imbecile explanation of electron spin as done by overpaid
Item 1) Only imbeciles give imbecile
Item 1) Only
imbeciles give imbecile explanations.
You can check this explanation for yourself,
it is found in the next short video at about 3 minutes in. The guy
in the video is David Awschalom
and he is (or was) the head of a spintronics department somewhere
on this globe.
Source file of the picture: Spintroncis
This is how he looks:
Now David is not the only physics professor
starting the explanation with a spinning earth but he is the
fucking head of a spintronics department!
Furthermore this David claims that this
electron spin can point in any direction like it can point to
anywhere on a sphere...
But the 1922 Stern-Gerlach experiment said that THIS JUST DID NOT
So in 94 years of progress in the science of
physics these weirdo's still miss the main point: IF IN THE
FUCKING STERN-GERLACH EXPERIMENT ELECTRONS GO AWAY FROM THE
STRONGEST PARTS OF A MAGNETIC FIELD, THIS IS CAUSED BY
And if the electron was a magnetic dipole,
the thing could never undergo such a strong repelling force. Once
you get that my dear but stupid David you also understand
spintronic devices like the read and write head in spinning hard
disks as we have at present day in our computers...
I hope that I am not sounding frustrated
because on the scale of things nobody dies from physics professors
thinking weird and unproven stuff. While for example in the
meantime if you look at the food advices from the Dutch Health
Council thousands and thousands die every year for no reason at
But the Dutch Health Council has a long
history of being on the wrong side of things: In the 1960 we
suddenly had to skip the fat and embrace a low fat diet.
Later a lot of people were advised not eating eggs because of cholesterol.
And so on and so on, even now in the year 2016 they advice stop
using butter and change to liquid oils...
In this world there is just never a shortage
on idiots in high ranking positions.
Till updates & bake a few eggs in lovely butter.
(08 Sept 2016) The Health Council of the
Netherlands (de Gezondheidsraad) has a multi decade long history
of giving the wrong food advices. Last year a new set of guidance's
for food choices came out and today we are looking if they still
are stupid to the bone yes or no.
Item 1) Check on the Health Council of the
Item 1) Check on the
Health Council of the Netherlands.
Last year new guide lines came out, you can
find them in the next link (it is in Dutch of course):
In these pages you can find two advices that
completely for the full 100% contra dictionary to each other.
These two advices are:
1) Stop drinking liquids that contain sugar,
this includes fruit juices.
2) Eat at least 90 gram whole wheat bread a day.
The idea behind advice 1 is likely that
consuming too much sugar leads to too high levels of blood sugar,
the body reacts by releasing insulin and as a result most of the
consumed sugar turns into body fat.
This is a very general thing: You can only
store fat if insulin levels get elevated.
The idea behind advice 2 comes from some
cohort research that I have no access to but likely they compare
whole wheat eaters to refined wheat eaters and indeed you may find
a small positive health effect.
More on blood sugar: Too high levels are
poisonous to the human body and in the so called Glycemic index
there are a whole lot of foods found and the influence on your
blood sugar it has.
Lot's of people ate a standard amount of food
like 50 or 100 grams and this is compared to eating 50 or 100
grams glucose. The amount of blood sugar after consuming glucose
is the fixing point labeled 100 (it is an index number).
The university of Sidney has a perfect
database of a lot of foods, you can check the numbers I give to
you yourselves over there:
Snickers Australian = 41
Snickers USA = 65
Orange juice = 46
White bread = 70
Whole wheat bread = 75 to 85
As you see on inspection, the orange juice is
relatively innocent compared to the whole wheat bread. Now you
might wonder as why whole wheat bread gives an ever higher reading
compared to white bread?
That is because whole wheat is not whole
wheat; about 5% of the weight is extra added gluten. Because
gluten is stuff that is in wheat naturally by law the millers are
not obliged to tell this on the package but you can see it at the
price you pay for whole wheat flower:
Always in every store if you compare the
cheapest while wheat flower to the whole wheat it is rather
precisely 50 cents more expensive. But hey ha ha ha, the price per
kilo gluten is 10€ hence 50 gr of gluten is 50 cents...
At the Dutch Health Council they think that
whole wheat means it is whole wheat but that is wrong, it is a
refined product because healthy things like vitamin E are removed
and sold to the cosmetics industry while extra gluten is added
because otherwise the bread will not rise properly.
Now what explains the very high index range
of 75 to 85?
The extra gluten causes even more very tiny bubbles in the bread
so whole wheat bread has more surface area for chemical reactions
when it is inside your gut system.
Do you understand why I think the Dutch
Health Council is just another load of academic imbeciles? They
name the Glycemic index in their report but when it comes to bread
they do not use it because it does not fit their ideas upon
healthy whole wheat foods...
And if you ask them about that anti bread
sentiment from lately they say: That is just some guru, it is just
From that reaction, that is broadly held at
the Health Council, you can see they are even not capable of
judging the stuff you can find in books like Wheat Belly that are
written by that 'guru'?
Let me give you a similar reaction from the
Two professional physics professors PPP1 and
PPP2 are having a conversation:
PPP1: I did read a very interesting article
about some guy that stated E = mass times the speed of light
squared, did you see it too?
PPP2: Yes but I looked it up and there is that guy Albert
Einstein, the problem is that he is not a scientist. He is just
some fucking clerk at some stupid patent office...
PPP1: Oh I did not know he was not a scientist at all, we better
skip that nonsense I just guess.
PPP2: Of course we skip this nonsense, only real scientist make
real science and clerks are only there to sharpen the pencils and
bring us our coffee.
And that happened, for over three years
nobody said a thing about what is now the most famous physics
equation: E = mc^2.
Ok this update is getting a bit long so let
me skip the Alzheimer things because with the Alzheimer things the
Dutch Health Council is also not picking up her responsibilities
but only talks coward shit year in year out.
Let me leave you with a screen shot of the
whole wheat GI index:
There are dozens and dozens more reasons as
why these people working at the Dutch Health Council are just
another layer of academic imbeciles.
For example in the year 2005 it was
discovered that the human brain can have diabetes, that was
classified as diabetes type 3.
If you would ask the Dutch employees of the
Health Council on that detail, they will react like seeing water
burning of you have more of that 'it is just one person who found
that' kind of stuff.
End of this update & and once more a
rigid middle finger to de Gezondheidsraad!
(07 Sept 2016) A few days back I finished the
update on new methods for differential equations. That is our item
Item 1) Second teaser picture for the diff
Item 1) Second teaser
picture for the diff equations update.
So how 'new' are these 'new methods' anyway?
To be honest I have no idea, for example in Part 2 where we do the
'easy Taylor coefficient finding' it is hard to imagine nobody has
done such a thing before.
And in Part 1 where we expand solutions from
the real line to the complex plane & more it is the same: It
is hard to imagine nobody has never done that before.
But in my life as a 53 year old person I have
never seen it in not a single book or some internet resource. Yet
one thing I can assure you: Everything beyond dimension 2 is very
likely never done before.
I shrunk the teaser picture from the other
website from size 550 x 550 to 450 x 450 (otherwise it does not
fit over here) and I hope you can read it a little bit.
The new update is 10 pages long (that is 10
pictures of size 550 x 1100) and I did my best to concentrate on
differential equations people know already and on approximation
methods people know already. (Like the Taylor approximation.)
Click on the picture to land on the new
For myself speaking the three coordinate
functions as shown above can only be found if you treat the 3D
vectors from 3D space as numbers. Otherwise you just cannot find a
result like this.
So that is one nail more in the coffin of the
official math professors who think century in century out that
three dimensional complex numbers do not exist...
End of this update, if I have time this week
we will also be looking at the very weird food advices as given by
the Dutch so called 'gezondheidsraad' or as they name it
themselves: Health Counsil of the Netherlands.
These people are retarded to the bone and
with only 10 minutes of internet search that can be validated on a
deep level. Ok, see you around & till updates.
(29 Aug 2016) I am very pleased with the
results from the university of California related to reversing
Alzheimer because that is not very hard to do via diet changes.
So that is item number 1, in item number 2 a teaser picture for
new methods of solving differential equations.
Item 1) Dutch government health officials are
Item 2) New methods for solving differential equations, teaser
Item 1) Dutch
government health officials are really stupid.
This year the Dutch health officials from the
so called Gezondheidsraad crafted new guidelines around food, In
the USA they have the 'food pyramid', here we have the 'disk of
In this item I will not go to long lengths as
why I think that Dutch government officials are just as
incompetent as math or physics professors. I just give a very
simple calculation around blood sugar levels. Here we go:
If you have developed that nice condition
known as diabetes type 2 you constantly have too much sugar in
your blood and that is not good. Now how do medical doctors
measure your blood sugar levels?
Very simple: If the reading is 140 that means
you have 140 milligrams of blood sugar per deciliter of blood.
That is a very difficult way of saying you have 1.4 grams of suger
per liter blood.
Healthy levels of blood sugar between meals
is in the range of 90 to 100 meaning 0.9 to 1 gram per liter
So in your blood there is about 5 gram of
blood sugar in your entire body if you have healthy blood sugar
Now suppose you eat two baguettes or about
200 gram of bread, let's say these two baguettes contain about 120
grams of wheat and I do not know the exact percentage but suppose
this wheat breaks down into 80 grams of sugar.
Do you understand the problem?
Eighty grams of sugar eager to enter your
blood stream is about 15 times the amount of sugar in your blood
you need to function properly.
Let me keep this item short: Most elderly are
not bicycling the Tour the France on a daily basis, they do not
need this high intake of sugar. It would be far more better if
their livers produce the blood sugar they need.
And this, my dear reader is why I think the
Dutch health officials are just another bunch of
Update from 31Aug 2016: The latest update on
food by the Gezondheidsraad are in the next link. It is a pdf file
and it speaks for itself.
Item 2) New methods
for solving differential equations, teaser picture.
In the past I have stated often that if the
complex plane is a fish bowl, the higher dimensional number
systems are an ocean.
Therefore the present 100 thousand
professional math professors always prefer to be in that very fish
bowl. This kind of flock behavior is very interesting, all in all
it acts like a religion preventing progress and studying the
ancient texts with devotion...
Hello bunch of weirdo's: Here I have two
functions x(t) and y(t) that are just simple real valued functions
but if you differentiate them this mimics the multiplication from
your superior complex plane.
Without all this emotion about incompetent
professionals: Lately I have been studying time evolution of
complex spaces and to my amazement it was so simple to find very
deep results so soon.
You know inside math societies there is that
idea going round: All the low hanging fruit was picked by Euler
and associates. This is a nonsense idea: Only overpaid people
eating bread at breakfast can take this seriously.
Here is the teaser picture, just
differentiate the two x and y functions my dear professional math
professors and voila: There is your magnificent complex plane
End of this update, finalizing the above math
work will take about one week while talking reason to our local
health officials will take about 750 years.
(24 Aug 2016) Last year in 2015 I did a seven
update long explanation of how to prevent Alzheimer based on the
idea that those dementia illnesses are caused by the brain not
having enough energy.
Anyway the conclusion was: Stop eating that
fucking bread because it contains gluten and the gluten is what
weakens the blood-brain barrier. Also stop eating all that weird
stuff like carbon-hydrates because if you eat the stuff that
babies and children need that is not good for you...
Now, 2016 by the way, at UCLA they had a
small study with only 10 patients but they were capable of
reversing the Alzheimer symptoms... That is our item of
Item 1) Can Alzheimer be prevented by simple
Item 1) Can Alzheimer
be prevented by simple dietary choices?
In 2015 I perfectly understood how bad the
general food advices are as given by the governments of all
Western countries. That is not some evil conspiracy but much more
accumulation of stupidity that gives rise to weird food advices
like eating bread for breakfast.
So in order to avoid hefty frustration I
decided: Only seven updates and after that we will observe year in
year out all those deaths from Alzheimer and the other brain
deceases that kill efficiently.
That is important because the imbeciles that
give those government sponsored food advices simply have to carry
a lot of their own grandma's and grandpa's to the grave before
they will realize: My food advices are not 'completely optimized'
It is now only one year later and this is
already the second time this year I speak about it again, but both
on the gluten front and the consuming of simple carbon-hydrates it
looks like the small UCLA study of only 10 patients is a
I only cut and paste change number 1 that is
the most important step in avoiding / reversing Alzheimer:
Eliminating all simple carbohydrates, gluten and processed food from her diet, and eating more vegetables, fruits and non-farmed fish.
Comment: It is important that year in year
out all those nurses and medical doctors keep on carrying their
own grandparents to the grave prematurely because only this kind
of emotion will change the way they view food.
Here is a modified picture of a screen shot,
once more it is important that those weirdo's that keep on eating
bread die too soon because they were stupid in the first
Source link: newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/memory-loss-associated-with-alzheimers-
Oops I also observe this strange advice of
'fasting for a minimum of 12 hours'.
Now in order to get a clear discrepancy
between the government guidance for food intake and my own view on
that: Always allow for the elderly who already have Alzheimer to have lot's of candy in their
Ok they will die prematurely from consuming
all those sugary products, but we live in a free society without
Let's leave it with that; please die from
Alzheimer to bring strength to my statistics!
Till updates & do not forget to eat your daily whole wheat
bread at breakfast.
(20 Aug 2016) Yesterday I posted reason nr 33
as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles, a link will be there
in item number 2.
In item number 1 we will look at the MIT
idiots once more.
Item 1) More MIT idiot behavior observed?
Item 2) Reason number 33 as why electrons cannot be magnetic
Item 1) More MIT
idiot behavior observed?
Today I was just clicking around on this very
website using the so called World Wide Web. To be precise: I was
looking at my magnetic page.
And guess what?
Entry date = 12 July and two of the picture
That was strange, this was so strange that I
felt a heavy desire to investigate and indeed on the internet
server two pictures were gone.
Indeed this is strange behavior of website
servers, so what kind of pictures are these??? Well these are two
pictures where I more or less verbally attack one of those MIT
weirdo's telling nuclear fusion is just around the
Here is the link to the refreshed page, I
uploaded the first two images a second time so now the reading
pleasure of the average reader is restored again:
July 2016: Reason 31: Experimental results from JET show non
confinement for plasma particles.
Please MIT give me a break: I am not
responsible for the utter stupidity of your own nuclear plasma
Item 2) Reason number
33 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles.
Reason number 33 is a rather perfect reason
because also in Europe we have lot's of weird physics professors
trying to make nuclear fusion work.
But the weird plasma professors always refuse
to accept the elementary detail that electrons and other spin half
particles are accelerated by magnetic fields.
I found a perfect quote that talks about
'magnetic energy' that is supposedly loaded into the nuclear
plasma and can destroy the fusion reactor if not understood
The professional plasma physics professors (
a pppp) do not understand it, but after retirement they can say
what they want. And as such I was happy as a child to find the
next drawing of a retired pppp:
Ok, end of this update. It was strange to
observe the two pictures related to the incompetents of MIT
removed from the web server.
But there is no need to declare war on MIT or the wider parts of
the USA because those people are on a long decade run of eating
themselves to death.
Of course I with them good luck with that ;)
(13 Aug 2016) Two days ago I posted reason
number 32 as why electrons must be magnetic monopoles or at least
must have a net monopole charge. In this update I named 3 things
as why nuclear fusion will never work.
Item 1) For the first time I use the words
Item 1) For the first
time I use the words 'magnetic discharge'.
When you look at those modern video's from
the surface of the sun with all those coronal mass ejections it is
hard to understand that this is only done by electrical fields and
Yet at present day with the Maxwell equations
still ruling the brains of professional physics professors only
electricity and/or mechanical motion can explain the behavior of
After my humble opinion, all those discharges
of plasma on the sun along magnetic field lines also have to do
with what I call a 'magnetic discharge'. It looks a lot like an
electrical discharge as for example we have here on earth in the
case of lightning where a channel of ions (plasma) enables the
Solar magnetic discharges must be different
in the sense you see something flying out and landing in some
other spot of the sun. But if it is for example only magnetic
monopole north particles going out, there must be a more or less
equal amount of magnetic monopole south particles going into the
Only you cannot see that but there is a strong clue as we see
Newton's law of action versus reaction at work because never we
observe shockwaves going out no matter how bit the coronal mass
Anyway a bit more down to earth; here is the
picture of professional physics professor Steve Cowley who at some
point in the video starts asking as why the plasma in the fusion
reactor starts rotating...
This Steve guy is from the UK JET fusion
project and every time those people make we wonder: How can you
work year in year out on stuff like that and never ever wonder as
what makes the plasma following the magnetic field lines?????
Click on the picture to land on reason number
Link to the video the above screenshot comes
ITER: Preparing to burn (Steve Cowley)
Let me not do negative or sarcastic but give
you a simple example:
If an electron with initial velocity of zero
goes from a negatively charge plate of -200 Volt to a positively
charged plate of +200 Volt we say it has gained 400 eV (electron
Volts) of energy.
The electrons follow the electrical field
lines because the electrical charges create a force on the
With magnetism it is grosso mode the same
only in practice it is very hard to mobilize enough magnetic
monopoles because now the line splits in the particles themselves:
there are two kinds of electrons, two kinds of protons, two kinds
of neutrons etc etc.
End of this update, till updates my dear
(03 Aug 2016) A teaser picture for a new post
on the other website.
Yeah yeah, higher order Cauchy Riemann
equations and the math paradise they bring... If you would ask one
of those severely overpaid non performing professional math
professors about higher order Cauchy Riemann equations they would
That is so simple to understand, nobody will
study that because you are only going around in circles.
Item 1) Teaser picture for an impending post
on the other website.
Item 1) Teaser
picture for an impending post on the other website.
Oops oops, partial differential equations as
the professional math professors have never seen them
So as usual since the year 1990 when I for
the very first time found the Cauchy-Riemann equations for the 3D
complex numbers, there will be no response whatsoever.
But life goes on and overpaying people always
introduces giant inefficiencies, just look at the banking sector
of our economy, and since life goes on I simply post some new
teaser picture of some partial differential stuff.
Let's keep it simple: Here are some higher
order CR-equations & let's leave it with
that... Click on the picture for the new post on the
Yeah yeah, factorization of the Laplacian
that rules the wave equation of quantum mechanics and those
weirdo's stay 100% silent year in year out.
End of this update, till updates.
(30 July 2016) Wow man I am back from a very
short holiday with a person named Son and although completely
untrained he performed well:
On the second day he had to bicycle 88 km and he was almost like
On day number five we did 104 km and after that he had plenty of
Also on day 5 we only ate non carb meals,
very small like less than one third of normal energy intake for
your body. It was a perfect lesson for Son: he now knows he can
ride the bike for over one hundred kilometers without any of that
weird carb food...
Item 1) Can you as a nation eat yourself to
Item 1) Can you as a
nation eat yourself to death premature???
Of course you can, the most perfect example
of wasting your citizens is the USA where more or less unavoidable
life span will decline more and more in the next decades to
It is strange that the nation with the
highest per capita citizen GDP is also the nation leading in
decline of your average citizen lifespan.
The best way to understand societies learn nothing from the global
obesity growth is every 3 months in Google news you search for the
simple phrase 'obesity'.
Just read some of that stuff and 3 months
later you do the same and you arrive at the conclusion: This is a
system that is not capable of learning.
It is always the same dumb stuff like people
need to exercise more.
But if as a nation you feed your citizens industrial products
instead of healthy food, what use is there in more
The reason for this update is the next simple
graph, I do not know how reliable it is but it is now the year
2016 and we are still more or less on steam with the impending
decline of average USA citizen lifespan expectation.
It more or less looks like those USA people
are eating themselves to death, I wish them good luck with that
because for the rest of the world that could be a reason to avoid
too much industrial products that are marketed as food.
Sources of the above picture:
America’s inefficient health-care system: another look
Economy of the United States
End of this small update, if you are a USA
citizen please keep on eating yourself to death because otherwise
you would make me look like some kind of fool and I do not like
(20 July 2016) Last year 2015 I did a seven
update long set of item's about Alzheimer, the root cause being an
energy problem in the brain via insulin resistance and how easily
to avoid this via dietary changes.
There was some unfinished business: All those weirdo's that
claimed you need to eat carbs because your brain only runs on
Item 1) Does evolution say: Thou shall eat
carbs 3 times a day all year long?
Item 1) Does
evolution say: Thou shall eat carbs 3 times a day all year
In 2015 we observed there is a whole lot of
experimental evidence that says Alzheimer is caused by insulin
resistance in the brain. And when your brain has insulin
resistance it cannot take in glucose while because insulin levels
are far too high the body cannot burn fat at the same time.
And if your body cannot burn the fat it gets
deposited at strange places like your muscles and even in your
body cells; that is the root cause of insulin resistance: intra
cellular lipids blocking the insulin.
Basically it is easy to understand:
If you like me are 50+ years of age but you
keep on eating like you are a 12 year old boy, likely you will run
into a broad array of trouble. At the same time our own government
is promoting to eat bread a few times a day but that stupid advice
only ensures you cannot burn fat.
And if you can't burn it, your body will
deposit it in the strangest of places.
Anyway, last year I could never find a
reliable source that explained in layman terms how your brain gets
the energy it needs to function normally.
The next video is from Eric Berg and a long
time ago that person was the first to inform me that after eating
a few slices of bread you cannot burn fat for many hours. I had
some WTF reaction to that but studying the details proved Eric to
be 100% right.
Anyway, click on the next pic to see the
video and if you want to avoid Alzheimer ensure that you are able
to burn that fucking body fat:
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cwojmZxsjY
In the meantime our own Dutch health
authorities knows as 'de gezondheidsraad' promote eating bread
because going against too much bread is 'just some trend' and is
promoted by 'just some guru'...
In my opinion these fake scientists should
start at the basis and look up some stuff known as the glycemic
index. It is obvious that in the past they were to fucked up
stupid for this and it is expected in the future to be the
So let me give the middle finger to de
gezondheidsraad, in our society those fake scientists only make
the problems worse and worse. Lets leave it with that, till
(19 July 2016) All this bogus stuff using
weird and complicated math that really does not help very much in
understanding magnetism. Today's item is a short one and we
compare how my 50 € experiment without any math at all relates
to a similar result from that what likely is a ppp. (A ppp is a
professional physics professor.)
Item 1) If you cannot use math, how to do
Item 1) If you cannot
use math, how to do physics experiments???
On 18 June I showed you the next photo where
I show that with a stack of about 30 € of those new neodymium
magnets on an old television you can separate the electrons from
the three electron cannons into three regions:
Region 1: The outside.
Region 2: The dark spot where no electrons land at all.
Region 3: The center spot where the electrons that are attracted
By all means, this is a very simple
So let me show you the math needed so that a
ppp can put up a similar graphic.
You can find this in the preprint archive, here is the title and
Spin Transport in Tilted Electron Vortex Beams
Try to understand the math these professional
It is incomprehensible, far to technical and has no relation with
real nature whatsoever. But weirdly enough, after using a galaxy
of not needed math this guy arrives at the next picture:
The conduct of those people is breathtaking;
holding on to the Maxwell equations but also capable of using some
'positive B' for spin filtering.
What 'positive B' actually is is not
explained of course; after all physics is the new 21-th century
religion and as such we will observe much more 'miracles' like
'positive B' before those weirdo's understand electrons carry
(13 July 2016) Just finished the 31-th reason
as why electrons are not magnetic dipoles, it even contains are
very simple calculation that everybody who understands
F = ma will grasp...
Item 1) Reason 31 as why electrons are not
Item 1) Reason 31 as
why electrons are not fully understood...
Ok ok I know I have to be patient, but I am
now talking 3 years about the fact that electrons do not behave
the way they are supposed to do under the present umbrella of
scientific physics knowledge.
That is about 2% of the time since the Gauss
law for magnetism was penned down by Gauss...
It is remarkable that also in this case we
have about zero response from the universities and academia; the
bravery of those people speaks for itself (just like all those
coward math professors).
Of course I can put a positive spin on
If they are incompetent to the bone, they
know when to stay silent...
Anyway, here is a small teaser picture and if
you click it you will land on reason number 31 as why electrons
are not magnetic dipoles as was conjectured by Gauss long long
long before the actual discovery of electrons:
Ok that was it, pop up a fresh beer or do
whatever you like.
See ya around! Till updates.
(11 July 2016) It was a beautiful day
yesterday because a Dutch guy did win an etappe in the Tour de
France using brain over muscle while the Portuguese won the
European soccer title...
But our item of today is about plasma
physics; if we want to save the earth for future generations we
need fusion energy but the shitheads do everything wrong big
Item 1) Why are professional physics
professors in plasma so dogmatic?
Item 1) Why are
professional physics professors in plasma so dogmatic?
The answer is very simple:
THEY BELIEVE THE GAUSS LAW FOR MAGNETISM IS ACTUALLY
I deleted the text as I wrote it last night;
I was far to angry and frustrated by how those plasma professors
do not understand their own stuff.
In order to kill the frustration I made a
picture with four small screen shots from the video below where I
show you what is wrong with the official approach. According to
the laws of Maxwell in a magnetized plasma no acceleration occurs
because of the magnetic field. On the other hand most people know
that if you observe turbulence this is always related to
acceleration of deacceleration of the stuff involved. Let it be
air around an air plane or plasma in a tokamak; the turbulence
itself is a strange attractor and always there are forces and
Here are just four things wrong with plasma
Fault 1: In the upper screen shot you see
helical electron or proton movement; this is correct and caused by
the Lorentz force but the way this is drawn you observe no
acceleration of the particle. That is the 'dogma part' of plasma
Fault 2: A giant difference between theory
and experiment; they try to understand how particles disperse to
the outside (that is the D with the perp sign to it) and if you
use dogma stating magnetic monopoles to not exist you get that
very small number.
Experimental evidence shows it is much much more like in the order
of one square meter per second.
To the excuse of the plasma professors this
is info from the UK based JET tokamak and they also use
electricity to keep the plasma together and electricity also
accelerates plasma particles...
Fault 3: Plasma does not diffuse properly,
anyway not like Brownian motion. But if you need stuff like Lévy-flight
to model your plasma, something must ensure the acceleration of
those particles. Well magnetic acceleration proportional to the
inverse of the mass explains all observed stuff properly.
Fault 4: If all spin half particles are
magnetic monopoles, in all tokamak and stellarator designs both
electrons and nuclei will more around in two directions. So you
will always get four streams of particles. And when those stream
collide always a lot of particles will hit the walls of the
I simply predict that both the 20 billion €
ITER in France nor the Stellarator from the Max-Planck institute
will work properly ever. The design is flawed because in fact the
particles are accelerated by the magnetic field and the longer it
is confined by the magnetic fields the more turbulent it will get.
It is as easy as it is my dear reader. (And
that made me so aggressive yesterday because the advocates of
nuclear fusion always do that bla bla of global heating but those
fools are on the wrong path...)
Anyway, here is a link to the video that
triggered it all:
classical transport in tokamak plasmas.
(09 July 2016) Yesterday I posted the latest
post on 5D complex numbers and how I found the first modified
Dirichlet kernel on the other website. Click this
or the teaser picture from the previous update below.
This update is about climate change as I can
see it where I live.
Item 1) The climate is shifting but nobody
changes lifestyle yet...
Item 1) The climate
is shifting but nobody changes lifestyle yet...
Just a few anecdotes:
Anecdote 1: Reinko is a draft soldier in the
years 1985 & 1986 and by train I had to travel every week from
the north to the south of this country. It was highly interesting
to observe spring of 1985:
In the south more or less perfectly the
spring in all of it's details started about 14 days early compared
to where I lived in the north of the country.
The distance traveled was about 300 km in a
In the year 2016 it was in the local news
that the growing season for al plant life around there was about 6
Beside spring we also have later autumns and
the calculation is very simple:
In about 30 years we now have the average
climate around here like it was in the 1980-ties about 450 km to
the south. For a human with their short lives this does not sound
like a bit deal, yet in geological terms it goes with the speed of
Anecdote 2) An 18 year old boy takes a walk
through a local park and there suddenly is that giant plant that I
just have never seen before. The locals name it bereklauw or
bearclaw. And the thing is beautiful, almost three meters high
unlike all other weeds around here it sure was a king the very
first second I did see that new weed.
At present day this weed has become a pest:
It has become widespread and is a highly invasive plant so to say.
Every year the costs of controlling this pest have gone up.
Here is a photo I took today, I think this is
ground owned by the local university and in the background there
was just some demolition of the new pest but one small plant
survived the pest control:
In the background you see the poisonous
Anecdote 3: Last month June 2016, for the
first time in recorded history the yet streams high in the
atmosphere have crossed the equator going from north to
Normally the atmosphere around the equator is
about 3 km higher and that more or less always keeps the jet
streams from the northern and southern hemisphere separated. Well
no longer I just guess.
Climate change is not something that will
happen in some long distance future, it goes on year in year out
but nobody changes lifestyle.
Therefore the people from the SETI project
searching for intelligent life elsewhere in the universe should
turn around their telescope and turn it into a microscope and try
to find intelligent life on our own very planet.
That is what I had to say today, have a nice
life or try to get one.
(04 July 2016) Today with a bit of delay like
seven days, I finished the text for the nest post on the other
website. It is about five dimensional complex numbers. Weirdly
enough the 5D update from 30
Jan 2014 on this website always ends up very high in the
search engine results.
That is strange because that old 30 Jan 2014
update is really hardcore & as far as I know reality
professional math professors do not like hardcore or softcore math
when it comes from outside a university or so.
And that is our item of today: a teaser
picture and a strange video of a guy defending the suburb academia
& university people.
Item 1) New teaser picture + do scientists
Item 1) New teaser
picture + do scientists use dogma?
For the math folks, professional or not,
British or not, try to think a little bit about the two integrals
in the teaser picture below. Likely they can be solved using
standard math techniques but I can solve it with two fingers in my
nose while looking & thinking at other problems...
As you see it has a nice flag in the
background, the flag is irrelevant because what is relevant is how
present day math could solve these two simple to understand
Later in the week when I uploaded the new post you can click on it
for the new post:
A Youtube channel under the name Concordance
or as he writes it: C0nc0rdance has most of the time carefully
thought through videos. Now to his defense I have to say this
conordance guy mostly takes it out at the USA based creationalists
and those USA folks believing in the literate creation of the
earth like every point and comma in the Bible was scientific fact
are one hundred percent retarded.
But thinking that the official science
community is not prone to such thought is naive by all standards.
I now have a solid bag of 30 reasons as why (for example)
electrons carry magnetic charge just like they carry electrical
charge but even if I could guess what happens if I would send that
to a peer reviewed physics outlet like Nature???
Come on Mr. Concordance; the peer reviewer
will use lot's of dogma because it is deep in the Maxwell
equations that magnetic monopoles do not exist.
Just a detail: For about 65 years physics
people try to make fusion reactors because we fucking need an
energy source outside gas, coal and oil. How much progress did
they make? Indeed zero point zero point nothing...
So do not say this so called 'exact science'
does not use dogma.
Here is the link:
The Tyranny of Evidence: Do Scientists Use Dogma?
Come on Mr. Concordance, both physics and
math professors use dogma all of the time in all of the places.
And year in year out a common characteristic is that when you
confront them with it: They stay silent year in year
Till updates my dear
(02 July 2016) By sheer accident today I
bicycled towards a local village known as Haren and I came
across that large spancloth reading: Open day 02 July at your
drink water company.
So driven by curiosity I went there and after
taking some photo's of all that technical stuff I suddenly
realized: THE BRITISH SHOULD KNOW THIS TOO!!!!!
So that is our item of today:
Item 1) Making Great-Brittany tea
Item 1) Making Great-Brittany
It is no secret the British love their tea
and that is not for nothing: without boiling the water and just
drinking it without a boil you get all those illnesses and often
By experience the clever British people know that if you drink tea
you do not die from all those kind of weir illnesses...
How does the average Brit make a tea?
For example this person lives near the river Thames, so if water
is needed they go out with their kettle or a wooden bucket and a
rope. They throw in the kettle or bucket and with the rope they
pull it in.
Ok, now the average Brit has his or her water
they boil it and make their tea with it.
Here in my own country we often use so called
ground water, it is free from bacteria or germs so it only needs a
few treatments and it can be pumped to the households and
companies that need water for a array of reasons.
We can drink tap water without getting ill...
In the next photo you see one of the oxidation chambers where
water from the deep ground is oxidized so it does not have that
And when seeing one of those oxidation
chambers I thought:
Wow man, the Brits should know this too!
But a few minutes later I realized that Louis
Pasteur was the person that discovered that people get a whole lot
of illnesses via germs. Let it be in the air, in the food or in
So the British logic very likely goes like
Louis Pasteur = a French person while;
France = European while;
Europe = Evil Super State where:
Super State abbreviates to SS and that has something to do with
World War II.
And I realized the British could never ever
use the theory of germ born disease because that is all evil evil
evil and it is better to make tea the British way once
Till updates my dear reader.
(30 June 2016) Today I did some serious
thinking now I understand that the pro Brexit camp was fighting
evil decade in decade out. They were fighting evil European
institutions where unelected technocrats were writing evil laws
that enslaved the freedom seeking wonderful British people.
And the coin fell: Start subsidizing corn
just like in the USA!
Item 1) Just like in the USA: start poisoning
your own population!
Item 1) Just like in
the USA: start poisoning your own population!
Every USA citizen knows that the USA is the
greatest nation on earth.
This is caused by the simple fact there are so many fat and obese
people over there; for their population size they have the most
kilo's of human biomass on the entire planet.
(Actually this is not 100% true because there
are some small island states where obesity rates are even
higher... But anyway for normal countries it is true.)
Now in the USA they also have a long history
of fighting evil, that was known as the war on drugs. And highly
fanatic government agencies on all levels, let it be federal or
state wise, fought drugs with ridiculous punishments.
For example if you were a teenager in the
1980-ties caught with a tiny amount of weed you got criminal
records. And for a lot of them that was the start of a lifetime of
But evil is evil so the authorities kept on
going to fight evil.
In the meantime decade in decade out the US
government kept on subsidizing corn and although that is not evil
an sich, they allowed the high fructose corn syrup in unlimited
amounts in the food of the US population.
So while fighting the evils of drugs, as far
as I know it the USA was the only government that poisoned it's
own population year in year out.
As a result we have a present generation of
youth that will have a shorter livespan compared to their
Also: Per capita citizen the USA has the
Now we have Brexit Brittany should much more
consider how she can be more and more in sync with the USA while
fighting the evil European institutions.
And after a bit of deep thinking the answer
is very simple:
Start UK subsidies on corn, stimulate the
consumption of high fructose corn syrup and ensure the rise of
obesity by making Brittany bigger as ever before.
Basically my advice is very simple: Just eat
your way out and you'll be fine...
A few technicalities as why it is so good to
poison your own population while fighting evil at the same time is
in the next vid:
Fructose Corn Syrup
And if you are from the UK don't forget to
eat more sugary stuff so all your savings go into your healthcare
problems and your political masters will be happy because now they
have more economical synchronization with the USA.
(29 June 2016) Correction: For me it is more
or less very funny but I made a stupid typo in the updates below:
it is not 0.1 cent but 0.1 Pound (or less than 0.1 Pound a day for
the average UK taxpayer).
I also remember as why I made this dumb
fault: I wanted to calculate it in pennies but I did not know how
much pennies there are in one Pound. Well since the evil
decimalization from 1968 (likely a European thing...) there are
100 pennies in one Pound....
In another development it slowly more and
more starts emerging that high fat diets simply are best. I can
confirm that because all in all I lost over 25 kg (for dumb UK
folks: that is over 55 lbs) and once you understand how food works
it is so simple to loose weight:
Simply avoid all foods that jack up your
insulin levels & live happily ever after.
Now in the UK people who have lost a similar
amount of body fat like I did, only 1 in 210 succeed in not
gaining weight but are capable of stabilizing their body mass...
The UK fuckheads, they all start eating carbs
again showing they might be able to loose some weight for a short
time but just do not understand what it takes long term...
Now when following a high fat diet consume
zero carbs, those carbon hydrates are only polymers of sugar and
humans are not like bees: for us daily consumption of sugar is
poisonous. Anyway here is the link:
High-Fat Diet Best for Diabetes Prevention in Obesity Prone
No news on the Brexit today yet it is
important to again tell the world the UK people are relatively
stupid because over there only 1 in 210 can hang on to a loss of
body fat of over 25 kilo's. I mean: THAT IS A CULTURE OF
So we are better off avoiding intimate
contacts. Till updates.
(28 June 2016) Didn't I say yesterday that
our local imbecile Geert Wilders would also like to have a
referendum? That one would have the name Nexit.
Now I was unaware of it but today it was on the news that the
political 'party' that is lead by the imbecile Geert Wilders filed
a so called motion in our parliament asking for a referendum over
here in the Netherlands.
Twelve parliament members from the political
'party' lead by the imbecile Geert Wilders voted in favor of it
together with two others that formerly were a member of the
political 'party' that is lead by the imbecile Geert
So that is a score of below 10% of Dutch parliament.
This drives our two items of today: Why is
political 'party' not a political party and that lovely 350
million a week bus from the Brexit weirdo's:
Item 1) Why a political 'party' and not a
Item 2) Why do so many British believe in such strange
Item 1) Why a
political 'party' and not a political party?
In any more or less democratic country if you
want to be political active you can join a political party. And if
you join you become that what is known as a member, you pay your
yearly contribution, you can go to meetings, you can vote for the
stuff that is so important the party members want to vote about
and so on and so on.
So not the PVV (that is the political 'party'
as lead by the local imbecile Geert Wilders). The PVV has only one
member: Geert Wilders.
Why Geert is so anti-democratic is something
I don't know.
But I know that the great Adolf was far more democratic:
If you wanted you could join the Nazi's...
Let's leave this imbecile with that.
Item 2) Why do so
many British believe in such strange propaganda?
Churchill once said: The best case against
democracy is just a talk to the average voter for just five
minutes. (Or words of similar phrasing.)
He was right: Most people live ordinary lives
and are satisfied with that and never try to get out and explore
some fresh and new idea's. They eat their daily bread that keeps
them dumb and when being dumb they ponder about stuff that dumb
fat people like to ponder upon.
As an experiment of thought:
Suppose you are one dumb daily bread eater
overweight person and you see this bus riding around:
Ok, I more or less estimated the average cost
for being in the European market for the average 30 thousand Pound
earning a year British tax payer about 0.1 cent a day.
That is the net cost because most of that
comes flowing back.
So why are so many Brits not attacking this
bus in the past from before the Brexit vote?
Once more: WE ARE BETTER OFF WITHOUT THESE
So from Adolf being much more democratic
compared to that piece of shit Geert Wilders to the Bus of Lies, I
call it a day and I say: till updates.
(27 June 2016) Yesterday I finally digged
into what those Brexit people had to say and it was some weird
stream of videos of UK people talking about 'the evil empire'.
It was kind of strange to observe this, for some collection of
weird reasons they think the European institutions are 'evil'.
So let's stay calm and observe we are simply
better of now those idiots have voted themselves out...
Another strange thing is that when our local
imbecile Geert Wilders shouts: 'We want a referendum too!!!' that
instantly a lot of foreign media folks think that Europe is on the
verge of collapse. And this all contributes to the panic on the
financial markets so I love it I love it & once more: I love
But I also love it that I, Reinko Venema, was
the guy that about 3.5 years ago figured out that electrons are in
fact magnetic monopoles. And with that I am simply better compared
to one century of professional physics professors...
It is as simple as it is... So our item for
today is what the ppp think of magnetic monopoles. The Youtube
video is from the Royal Society, I saved it for a rainy day like
Item 1) The heroic search for magnetic
monopoles by the ppp.
Item 1) The heroic
search for magnetic monopoles by the ppp.
The professional physics professors are
looking for a magnetic monopole that is at the end of an infinite
long curly string and at the end for some strange reason a
magnetic monopole has to drop out...
Now in my world the word 'imbecile' not only
refers to people like the Brexit voters or our local imbecile but
also to physics professors who accept stuff like this 'infinitely
long string' bla bla bla.
It is so retarded that I am not going to
comment on the video from the Royal Society; after all they made
it themselves and after they made the video they did not destroy
it but uploaded it to the Youtube channel so that every body can
enjoy the fruits of their mind processes:
quest (by the UK Royal Society)
Just a screen shot: Paul was likely thinking
if you extend this spiral thing long enough you would get a
Once more: this is so retarded and a
disservice to the good things Paul Dirac did & I am not going
to comment on this nonsense.
(25 June 2016) It would be tempting to
comment about the Brexit but the main goal of this update is a bit
more on the Maxwell equations. Therefore a small item on the
Brexit and a normal item on the Maxwell equations related to the
speed of light.
Item 1) Good news: The UK parasitic suckers
Item 2) The Maxwell equations and the discovery of the speed of
Item 1) Good news:
The parasitic suckers are out!
Decades ago it started with Margaret Thatcher:
WE WANT OUR MONEY BACK!!!
Now for some strange reason or a collection
of strange reasons the Brexit camp in the UK always says that the
UK is the biggest net contributor to the EU.
I am amazed at how dumb this is; for the
average tax payer in the UK about 1% of the paid taxes flow to the
EU and a lot of that comes back. A guy under the alias of
Thunderfoot made a good Youtube vid about that, he says:
Suppose you earn 30 thousand Pound, you get
taxed about 10 thousand Pound and from that about 100 Pound goes
to the European institutions.
Most of what you pay comes flowing back and indeed if you are a
net contributor as a country it might be expected not all 100
Pounds come flowing back so our hypothetical tax payer has a net
loss of let's say 20 to 30 Pounds a year.
That would amount to at most 0.1 cent a
For that they have access to a market of 500
million people, but for parasites as the British are these costs
are apparently too high...
Therefore as a Dutch guy I am glad we have
gone rid of those parasitic shitholes...
Item 2) The Maxwell
equations and the discovery of the speed of light.
Ok, it is not a secret I have a long list of
about 30 reasons as why electrons must be magnetic monopoles and
not the magnetic dipoles as the consensus is inside the field of
If electrons are magnetic monopoles you need
just a tiny change in the equations from Maxwell. But in the
science of physics this Maxwell guy was some kind of prophet and
on top of that he used an equation from Gauss that said that
magnetic monopoles do not exist.
Weirdly enough Gauss made his contribution
many many years before the electrons were discovered. And as far
as I know in the year 2016 there is zero point zero evidence that
there is experimental proof for this weird claim.
I mean everything in the Maxwell equations is
shouting for symmetry, yet in the year 2016 professional physics
professors are not capable of explaining the asymmetry as only
waiving their arms while stating: life is so difficult to
Here is a nice screenshot:
At present day you cannot paste code linking
to Youtube video's any longer: You do not get a clean small link
but the entire 'Youtube experience'.
But the screen shot from above is from the
next IP address:
Let's leave it with that and don't forget the
GOOD NEWS: These idiots that do not understand the 0.1 cent
calculus have a NEW FUTURE!!!!
(18 June 2016) Two items: a teaser picture
for a new post on the other website about modified Dirichlet
kernels and an item about reason number 30 as why electrons are
magnetic monopoles or if you want: carry a net magnetic
Item 1) Teaser picture for the modified
Item 2) More proof that electrons are magnetic monopoles.
Item 1) Teaser
picture for the modified Dirichlet kernels.
In a few days I will post a relatively easy
to understand post on the other website (that is 3Dcomplexnumbers.net)
and I did my best to keep it as simple as possible:
Only dimension 1, 2 and 3 are covered
although dimension 1 is rather boring because it amounts to a
modified kernel that says d(t) = 1 all the time...
But for n = 2 my modified kernels nicely
gives the complex plane, as such suggesting this method of
modified kernels are the answer to a few very deep mathematical
questions I never dreamt of solving it...
What the hydrogen bomb is in the average
nuclear arsenal, that is what modified Dirichlet kernels are in
the study of higher dimensional number systems.
All in all I am glad I finally did pen down
this simple math because it contains a few elementary proofs that
I always took more or less for granted. But now they are written
down and on a very fundamental level I could expand my proofs
using existing knowledge. So this is not about 'new trigonometric
equations' but the other way around:
Prove this trigonometric identity using
Here is the thing to prove:
It is not a deep result but it is very
fundamental to my theory of 3D complex and circular numbers.
Item 2) More proof
that electrons are magnetic monopoles.
Lately one of my brother came by for a visit
and since this is a relatively seldom event it was nice to show
some of the changes in my household like garden stuff, new
furniture made and also:
Show my triple electron cannon gun particle
accelerator and how it reacts on a s stack of those new neodymium
And when I showed him you could create spots
on the screen where no electrons land, he observed that 'this is
caused because electrons follow the magnetic field lines'.
For me this is a very valuable insight
because if my brother thinks that it is highly probable a lot of
professional physics professors think that too...
In the magnetics page I updated number 30
with two more photo's showing how electrons behave under the
magnetic fields of the new neodymium magnets.
And those two photo's counteract what my brother said:
Electrons follow the magnetic field lines and
are also magnetic dipoles...
As usual click on the picture to land on the
Ok, that is what I had to say. Till
(09 June 2016) Ok ok may be yesterday I came
a bit hard down on those beautiful people that only have a hard
time to understand math but otherwise they are the best of
intellectual forces humanity has...
So today I actually took the time to look at
the Youtube video I posted myself yesterday and at one hour and 34
minutes I decided I had enough.
Item 1) Hey you Harvard weirdo's, why not
explain to me the electron pair???
Item 1) Hey you
Harvard weirdo's, why not explain to me the electron pair???
When thinking about humans discussing if or
not the universe is just a computer simulation I only get a severe
headache after listening to all that stupid stuff they say.
No computer can simulate itself, so for the
universe to be a simulated thing you need a computer that is many
many times the size of our universe. So that is a little bit
problematic in the first place.
So let me keep this update rather simple and
challenge all those beautiful minds they have at Harvard,
Cambridge, Oxford, Russian universities and so on:
PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME, IF THE ELECTRON IS A
MAGNETIC DIPOLE, WHY ARE THERE ONLY ELECTRON PAIRS OBSERVED?
Why does nature (simulated or not) does not
allow for the electron triplet?
Let's leave it with that, the overpaid
university workers will do their thing once more and talk about
themselves and how good they are... Till updates.
(08 June 2016) In the last update where I
questioned if Elon Musk was a simulated retard I found 3 more of
these weirdo's talking about our universe being a computer
Item 1) Is the science of physics a
replacement for religion?
Item 1) Is the
science of physics a replacement for religion?
Religion is the oldest form of organized
science because religion tried to explain stuff about the world we
humans could not understand very good.
So everything was created by some almighty
God or Yahweh or Allah or some Hindu stuff...
And many valuable thought exercises were
made: how many angels can dance upon the point of a needle.
Normally scientists like Neil deGrasse Tyson
always reject the creationist thing because of the argument 'Who
And now these same people come up with the
concept of that our universe is just a computer simulation of some
superior alien race and that this kind of reasoning brings forward
many 'mind blowing questions'.
Don't believe me? Read this:
WATCH: Is our Universe a simulation? The experts weigh in
Who are these so called 'experts' that in my
view cannot bake a mathematical cake anyway? There names
1) Lisa Randall
2) Neil deGrasse Tyson &
3) David Chalmers (the 'I found computer code inside math'
Facts are these 3 so called 'scientists' are
too stupid in the first place to understand higher dimensional
math like complex numbers in the first place.
In the second place people like these might be good in popularizing
science but now they look as if they live to be on the television
screen forever and ever...
Back in the past it were also the more
advanced scientists who pondered the question of how many angels
could dance on the tip of a needle; in those old gone days it was
the church that was the keeper of all knowledge known to man.
At present day the universities and
academia's think they are the keepers of all knowledge scientific
and we get shit like our universe is some computer
I have said it so often:
Present day science is organized like it is
some substitute for religion...
And if our universe would be a computer
simulation, the computer that does this would be some kind of God
don't you think?
And who did build that computer anyway?
That is just like the question who created God...
Let's stop this nonsense update on weird
pseudo scientists like number 1), 2) and computer coding finding
Sometimes I just wonder: Why do people like
this talk crap bordering on the side of pure religion and why do
they not study math at all?
Till updates my dear reader.
(02 June 2016) For years I am annoyed by
people who say that we are living in a computer simulation of some
alien advanced species.
Just 'do the statistics' they say; the
probability that we are living inside a simulation of reality are
far greater compared to actually not living in a simulated
Item 1) Is Elon Musk a simulated retard?
Item 1) Is Elon Musk
a simulated retard?
In the USA the Elon Musk guy is rather famous
because he is in a very interesting array of companies. Rumors say
he is more or less against AI (artificial intelligence) and in the
next video you can observe all that stupid talk about 'living
inside a simulated world':
Musk: Chance we are not living in a computer simulation is 'one in
Now without doubt Elon is a smart guy and to
be honest there is something to the idea we are living inside some
But it is all nonsense after you try to do
the next thought experiment:
You must build a computer that has only one
Craft a simulation of yourself, so the
computer has to build a program that if executed properly is a
simulation of itself.
Just think about that for a few days; even
our biggest human build super computers can only mimic a few
million molecules of let's say the actual power supply of that
very super computer.
This is a very fundamental law in my
No computer can make a simulation of itself
that is actually better than the original.
So the idea that we live in a simulated world
is kind of crazy to the bone:
Show me the computer that can do this in the
first place and secondly:
Show me the aliens that for some strange reason want to make such
simulations of our universe...
Please keep it real: Despite what all those
scientist say, it is fundamentally not possible to live inside a
simulation because computers cannot simulate themselves.
Hence, we are living in some kind of
reality... (And not in some stupid simulation of that.)
(27 May 2016) This update is mainly an
advertisement for the new [a, r, t] coordinates as I published
them on the other website a few days ago.
That is our item of today:
Item 1) An advertisement for the new [a, r,
t] coordinate system.
Item 1) An
advertisement for the new [a, r, t] coordinate system.
With a delay of about one week I finished
this update, it is 14 pictures long with picture size 550 x 775
It is less technical compared to the latest
update on page
4 of the higher dimensional complex numbers where on 6 May I
introduced the [a, r, t] coordinates for the first
In the [a, r, t] coordinate system all of
those special properties of important particular higher
dimensional complex numbers come together and each play the fine
role as is needed.
For any coordinate system to be useful, if
must adept to the way the human brain works. For example we teach
rectangular coordinates to high school pupils and when you enter
university you also get polar coordinates in the plane.
Cylindrical and spherical coordinates in 3D space and so on.
This [a, r, t] coordinate system is luckily
very easy to understand:
You take a cone and drag it through space along it's main axis of
You can 'touch' every point in 3D space with this simple
Ok ok there are some technical issues: In
order to calculate the t coordinate you need all these fancy
internet apps so this new coordinate system is in many ways also a
true 21-century coordinate system: without those internet apps or
advanced computer programs on your desktop it would not be of much
In the post on the new [a, r, t] coordinates
I also give a new rule of de Moivre and I am joking that in about
3 centuries it is good there is finally some progress on that
Here is the teaser picture, click on it to
land at the post on the new coordinate system.
Ok that was more or less what I had to say;
it is funny to point attention once more to the new de Moivre
identities while at the same time noticing non of all those fancy
overpaid math professors will react on it...
Let's leave it with that, till updates my
(20 May 2016) On the other website a weird
thing is going on: I am getting hundreds of comments on my post on
using 3D complex numbers for atomic and molecular orbitals. There
is only one tiny problem: Non of them are written by humans...
So that is the item for today:
Item 1) Can we kill AI before it kills us or
shall we love AI?
Item 1) Can we kill
AI before it kills us or shall we love AI?
The last years all of a sudden AI is taking
off because now you can train artificial neural networks like
never before. This stuff is known as deep learning; it is possible
to create some collection of artificial neural network and to
Anyway to make some long story very very
A very important update on the other website
was update number three on how to use 3D complex numbers when
solving the Schrödiger equation. It basically says you should use
only 3D complex numbers that are found on the main
It is relative deep math, so you are invited
to check on those hundreds and hundreds of weird comments make by
computer programs but there is not one real human amongst them at
my other website:
post on the Schrödinger wave equation using 3D complex numbers
for atomic & molecula orbitals.
End of this update on the rise of the
machines: Will they kill us?
Till updates my dear reader.
(14 May 2016) Yesterday may be many years to
late I went to the local child protection agency here in my city.
They are located at the Leonard Springer Laan. At first I only
wanted to make an appointment for next week or so, but there was a
female prepared to make notes so I told my story.
So I am changing my seven uploads on Hanneke
slightly because the female from the local child agency explained
a bit to me how children behave when they come under severe deprivation
of people that show normal affection.
This is the item for today:
Item 1) Because the smallest child behaves
like the child protection female says...
Item 1) Because the
smallest child behaves like the child protection female says...
Ok the latest news on the smallest child of
the female psychopath Hanneke is very simple: Together with his
sister he moved to a new school but he has behavior problems that
forced the school to expel him and he has to go to one of those
special education schools.
But on those schools there is no room so he
has to wait at least 30 days. And ha ha ha most of those 30 days
will be spend with his dearest of psychopath mommy's depriving him
even more from contact with people that act normally when it comes
to showing a bit of affection.
When telling my small selection of
observations around Hanneke the female from the child protection
Such children when they are offered affection
often are very claiming about that.
As I understood from the biological father of
the child this is the case: The small boy wants attention from his
teacher but he is in a class with like say 25 other children.
He does not get his attention fast enough so he does things like
pulling the cables from the computers or some other stuff that
brings attention in a fast way...
You see, everything I have told you points
only in one direction:
Hanneke is a psychopath and as such she is
not capable of understanding in a deep way how emotions in other
Let me close this with story number 7 on
Hanneke because for myself speaking I am deprived from talking
about math and stuff:
Last year Hanneke her oldest son became
homeless because for a few years he has lived with his biological
father (he has a different father compared to the other kids) and
that father moved to another town.
So he became homeless sleeping on other addresses
most of the days. I meet him in the street and he is explaining a
bit how life goes and he cannot get enrolled in a new education
because he is homeless. And those schools do not accept homeless
I think about it for a day or two and decide
'You can live officially at my address but you can't be here seven
days a week'. He agrees.
In the same time I met Hanneke and we talked
a bit about the homeless problems of her eldest son. And she is
completely against the idea that he could use my address for
example when he has to receive some mail or so.
So this is the emotional system of the
psychopath named Hanneke S:
When her oldest son is homeless, she tries to
make him homeless even longer.
Ok, end of the 7 Hanneke files. Till
(12 May 2016) This is update number five on
Hanneke. In this update I describe some stuff that happened in the
year 2005 so that is when she only had one child.
Item 1) After a few weeks suddenly Hanneke
Item 1) After a few
weeks suddenly Hanneke understands why...
Ok I learned the 10 year old boy to ride a
bicycle and I slowly get more understanding of what is missing in
his upbringing as a child. Now all my own children are a member of
the local library; for kids up to 18 years it is totally free and
that is one of the unpaid treasuries of our society.
Needless to say I consider it very important
that children have access to giant vaults of knowledge and also
fun books to read. So I am consulting Hanneke if she knows it is
free anyway and shall be make her son also a member of the local
I didn't know it was free she says so I take
that as a token that we can go direction city library.
So I take Hanneke her son there, show him how
the book borrowing system works, we go through the membership
administration stuff etc etc.
The boy selects some books and we return
home, likely at Hanneke her house I will drink some whisky and
smoke a few joints because by now I understand that is her
favorite way to kill the day time.
I basically forget about the whole thing
until a few weeks later Hanneke shows up at my doorstep in the
evening. Her child is unsupervised at her home apparently.
And Hanneke is really mad at me, that is
clear so what is the problem I ask.
Now I understand why you did all this library
stuff! (She is really angry!)
That is to put my family in a bad spot light! (I have no clue what
this is about.)
Well it turns out the boy was late with
returning the borrowed books, as most people know this is no a big
deal like a fine of 10 cents a day.
I try to explain that I never wanted a bad
spot light on her family in any way but she keeps on being highly
emotional and keeps on insisting that I did this library stuff
only to put her family in a bad spot light.
After two full hours of 'discussion' this
detail it dawns on me the only way to stop this nonsense is to put
up a fight in order to reset the brain of Hanneke.
And I am shouting as hard as I can: Why do
you have no teeth? You were a fucking heroin whore, you are a
useless piece of shit. Your face is so ugly, who wants to fuck you
After about 10 minutes of this stuff (in the
meantime I am worrying what my neighbors will think of me tomorrow
and the days after...) finally her brain breaks down and she
starts to sob and cry.
So after about 2.5 hours she stopped
explaining that all this library stuff was done to put her family
in a bad spotlight. All the time the kid was home so I send her
back to her house and indeed she goes away.
Now my dear reader take some time to think
about it: There are far less female psychopath compared to the
rate of male psychopaths in the population.
But on that day in the year 2005 I more or
less began to understand that Hanneke was a female
Yet on the wider range of things, every
person is more or less a psychopath. For example if you step with
you shoe on a few ants, do you instantly stat crying because you
just killed a few of those very beautiful ants?
No, normal people usual have little emotional
attachment to a few bugs that might get killed yes or no. After
all pest control is also important.
Let me end with a nice old video of a
neuroscientist who more or less discovers from his own brain scan
he himself is in fact a psychopath also...
But ha ha ha, there is a difference; Hanneke
has a very low IQ while this guy is a higher IQ version of the
Discovering One's Hidden Psychopathy
End of this update, till updates my dear
(11 May 2016) This is update number four on
Hanneke. In this update we do bedtime stories Hanneke style while
in the next update I will give you a rather fundamental proof of
her being a female psychopath.
Item 1) Bedtime stories Hanneke style.
Item 1) Bedtime
stories Hanneke style.
Ok, in the afternoon we have been smoking
joints and drinking whisky for hours in a bad ventilated room with
a baby present.
We have had our food and that is a thing where Hanneke is very
good at: cooking.
After the meal I turn to beer because I
cannot stand those huge amounts of whisky.
Somewhere between 7 and 8 'o clock in the evening Hanneke suddenly
decides it it bedtime for the baby.
So she grabs the kid form the floor, goes to
the room next to the living room en returns in a few seconds. As
soon as she closes the door the baby starts to cry.
Hanneke walks to the dinner table in the
corner of the living room and she does not say a thing. I can see
she is angry because of all that crying from the sleeping room.
This goes on for over half an hour, all the time she keeps looking
At some point in time I try to explain why
telling bedtimes stories and talking a bit of what happened that
day is good for children and that most of the time they will not
Hanneke does not say a thing, I am pretty
sure all three of her children have never heard one story from her
in their entire life. They might have seen it on the television,
parents that actually talk to their children instead of only
giving commands and barking negative comments...
Now why does Hanneke do this? Once more; a
psychopath has no clue about how emotions in normal people work.
For Hanneke reading bedtime stories is a fucking waste of effort
and time. For her doing that there is no reward like more whisky,
more cannabis or money. Beside that there is not a single
childrens book in the house. (May be now there is but at the time
it was not.)
Very likely this goes on every evening:
without any announcement suddenly picking up the child put her in
bed and leave the room as fast as possible...
Welcome in the wonderful world of Hanneke...
Next time we will do the library story; when that happened I
understood she must have psychopath issues. So till updates my
(10 May 2016) A bit more of Hanneke stories
but I promise you that this is update number 3 on Hanneke and I
will stop after update number 7 just like last year when I tried
to explain you can only get Alzheimers if you eat bread every day
So we pick up on the day when the daughter of
Hanneke was able to walk using the table as a guide.
Item 1) Late in the afternoon her oldest son
walks into the house, what will happen?
Item 1) Late in the
afternoon her oldest son walks into the house, what will happen?
It is about five o'clock in the afternoon and
we have been drinking whisky and smoking joints for a few hours in
a badly ventilated room with a baby around.
And her oldest kid enters the house.
This is not on deaf ears on Hanneke her
behalf and she commands the kid over here and with great interest
I observe a long stream of problems that this kid
It is not like "Hey son what have you
been doing today but this morning you left a few bread crust on my
aanrecht while you were preparing your meal for school while I was
sleeping in my bed. Can you clean this up now?"
No, minute after minute a stream of low
accusations comes out.
It is clear the boy is used to this, he simply swallows all this
low stuff and even tries to make a reasonable comment but this
makes mommy only more furious.
For me it is clear that the usual bonding
between a child and it's care giver simply is not there. It is
just some psychopath female trying to bring control to the
End of this update & we will have
precisely four more updates on Hanneke to go.
(09 May 2016) Oh oh now I opened the box of Pandora
about a female named Hanneke S why not post a second update with
some baby stuff from about 8 or 9 years ago?
If after reading this you think I was an
asshole not going to the police or the child protection agencies
it is very simple:
1) In those long lost years the local police
always tapped the sounds in my home via my telephone. The
technical details how they did this are not important but each and
every day when I did my daily walk to the local supermarket it was
always at the same space there was this police car with always 3
police officers in it.
It was always at a shop named Dik Race, they had fine-tuned me
leaving my house against their readiness of preventing ruthless
2) Child protection agencies? Give me a
brake, I was under investigation myself.
And if you are under investigation yourself, there is little
practical use of making them change their minds.
Item 1) Hurray, Hanneke has a new baby and
she is so cute!
Item 1) Hurray,
Hanneke has a new baby and she is so cute!
It's about 8 or 9 years back and I am over at
Hanneke her house that is right behind the corner and her baby
named S is just so cute! By now she can stand holding herself at
the table and move a bit around by that.
Hanneke asks me: shall we smoke a
That was ok by me although even in those long
lost years I never liked smoking weed during the day time. So
Hanneke prepairs a joint and I say:
Shall we go to the garden because all this
smoke is not good for babies.
Hanneke, skilled female psychopath as she is,
she opens a tiny window so that fresh air can come in.
The baby S is trying to get to mommy and is
going to use the table as a guide.
All of a sudden Hanneke places a carton box
between her and the baby.
The baby clearly does not like it, but at
looking at the scene she decides that if she moves all the other
way around she would still make it to mommy...
So the baby goes all the way step by step and
tries to make it to the other side.
And guess three times what happens?
Mommy replaces the carton box so the path of
the baby is blocked & the whole scene repeats itself. And
again mommy replaces the carton box so that fucking stupid baby
would stay away from touching her.
And as such what once was a perfect baby is
at present day a child having all kinds of damage that was not
needed in the first place.
End of this update, have a nice life or try
to get one.
(07 May 2016) Two items, one about a street
kid I know for about 11 years and the second item is about a brand
new coordinate system that is very beautiful if you understand
Item 1) What about the boy now he is so
Item 2) Teaser picture for the latest math update.
Item 1) What about
the boy now he is so psychotic?
It was in the year 2005 and there was that
boy walking down the street with a bike in his hands. And always
he was only walking, he never did ride his bicycle.
So I asked him why he never rode his bike and
he said: I would like to ride my bicycle but I do not know how to
A few days later I learned him how to ride a
bicycle, it took a lot of running but within one hour he could
ride his bike...
Later I confronted his mother, her name is
Hanneke and I asked her as why her 10 year old son was not able to
ride a bicycle. All I got for an answer was some lousy explanation
as that she herself never learned that and when she fell with her
bike and came back in bruises she only got laughed at by her
More later I confronted his mother: But you
got pregnant so you had to stop smoking weed and stuff.
Answer from mommy dear: But I was so glad to give him that feeling
of a high while he was still in my womb...
Fast forward to today: Yesterday I visited
the boy who is now in emergency care at the local shrink clinic
know as Lentis in Groningen. He is totally psychotic like cutting
his clothes, wearing sun glasses with only one dark glass &
Now the psychopath scientist in me is glad to
observe what 21 years of emotional neglect can do do a child. But
my human part suffer a lot because the female under the name of
Hanneke has two more children under her care.
They will more or less go down the same route, that makes me
Item 2) Teaser
picture for the latest math update.
With great joy I announce a new coordinate
system, it can only be used inside a 3D number system like
circular or complex numbers. So during my life it will never take
off because of the 'special smartness of the professional math
professors'. But decades ago I understood how smart these people
are, so why talk about shit when you can also discuss math beauty
like a new coordinate system???
Come on, they are mostly imbeciles with that
retarded stuff like 1 + 2 + 3 + ... = -1/12.
And do those retards ever come up with a
simple but fundamental new way of crafting new coordinate systems?
Nope, njet, no, nee, nein und nimmer...
They only recycle the known coordinate
systems like the rectangular, spherical or cylindrical coordinate
Well talked enough about those people, here
is the teaser picture and in this picture you can see that I
myself can also be very stupid for decades on a row:
In the past I really tried to find metrics so that the length
would be preserved, but the determinants always killed everything
I threw at it.
Yet in the upper part of the teaser picture
is something I should have calculated a long long time ago. As
usual click on the pic to land at the update.
(01 May 2016) A few days back I posted an
extra update in my 'debunking Euler' update on page four of the
higher dimensional complex numbers. That is the item for
Item 1) More debunking Euler stuff...
Item 1) More
debunking Euler stuff...
Originally posted on 15 April, two days back
I posted two more pictures there
where I basically do two things:
Thing 1) Calculation zeta at minus one using
the analytical expansion and
Thing 2) Make the same flawed mistakes as those five Nottingham
professors do but now with the geometric series.
Since everybody knows the geometric series I
found wisdom in debunking the
1 + 2 + 4 + 6 + 16 + 32
+ etc etc = -1.
But university people are university people
and indeed it was simple to find a university weirdo easily
explaining as why this should be minus one:
Past Infinity (WARNING: Math Ahead)
The above video is from MinutePhysics, it is
only 47 seconds long and the calculation speaks for itself.
Needless to say it is nonsense on a very deep level.
But university people are university people
and a pure intellectual under that name of Singing Banana was
Nottingham professor number five that give the green light for
nice summations like:
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + etc
etc = -1/12.
All of this nonsense feeds upon itself: The
math people think that because the physics people from string
use it, there must be some truth in it.
The physics professors think that because Euler and Ramanujan are
never debunked properly it must have some value.
And life, life will go on...
End of this update.
(28 April 2016) Two more updates in the
magnetic page, so that is our item:
Item 1) Reason number 27 and 28 are added in
the magnetic page.
Item 1) Reason number
27 and 28 are added in the magnetic page.
It is well know that a moving electrical
charge like an electron produces a magnetic field and a moving
magnetic charge produces an electrical field.
So my teaser picture looks very weird:
according to professional physics professors the electron is a
magnetic dipole. We have used the scientific method they say.
That is very interesting, but in this teaser
picture as far as I can see I do not see a magnetic dipole at
work. If there is any truth to those pictures depicting how linear
polarized light acts, it cannot be a magnetic dipole combined with
an electrical monopole.
I have spoken, here is the teaser
Have fun with thinking about the existence of
linear polarized light.
It is well known that professional physics
professors are very good at stating the next:
If you think you understand quantum
mechanics, you don't understand it.
And they are in the right: If you think that
an electron is a magnetic dipole it is extremely hard to
understand quantum physics.
Here is a nice Youtube video from a female
that really tries to understand the stuff with electron spin but
she just keeps on hanging to that dipole magnetic thing.
Once more we observe that 'modern science' is only a substitute
for religion, but let me skip my usual stick horses:
The video is from a female under the name
'looking glass universe' and she really tries to make sense of the
concept of electron spin.
She is cute but also a perfect example as why physics is the 'new
religion' because dogma's are never doubted but used as basic thought
End of this update, have a nice life or try
to get one.
(20 April 2016) Just an item related to an
Item 1) I emailed daughter but she said she
did not understand it...
Item 1) I emailed
daughter but she said she did not understand it...
Oh oh, I emailed Daughter with a short
version of the debunking Euler proof and she said she did not
understand. And since she is not particular crazy I decided to
look for that video that is fool proof so that you can understand
as why some professional math professors think that:
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + etc
etc = -1/12.
This is all very basic math, no zeta function
stuff or so...
Only the fact you can add or subtract two rows of numbers and that
you can multiply them by a constant number. Click on the picture
for the Youtube video:
Video link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-I6XTVZXww
And if you search for the 'sum of all
numbers' on Youtube you get the next stuff:
Well I really hope I did not confuse to many
people because that proof saying it is nonsense to valuate the
natural numbers to -1/12 is just basic math.
(16 April 2016) Two new updates and that is
the item of this update:
Item 1) Debunking Euler & third post on
the Schrödinger equation.
Item 1) Debunking
Euler & third post on the Schrödinger equation.
Five days ago I was at a public lecture at
the local university here in Groningen and a guy named Frits
Rammers (for Dutch folks that would be Frits Beukers) talked also
a bit on a very bizarre result dating back to Euler himself:
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + etc etc = -1/12.
Obviously this must be nonsense, only people
why are bad at math will fall into this trap done by the high
priest of math himself: Leonhard Euler.
Now does this change my views on Euler since
this high priest is so easy to debunk?
Of course not, Euler gave the world the number e and if he would
not have done that it would only be in this century that I could
do the same... ;)
So as far as I am concerned, Euler will
always be the number 1 guy when it comes to ranking math people in
the long run. The debunking stuff is found in
page 4 of the higher dimensional complex numbers, to be
precise it is at entry 15
The third post on the Schrödinger wave
equation is on the other website:
Both updates were fun to do: The Euler
debunking stuff was fun because it was so easy while at the same
time for example 26-dimensional bosonic string theory is based on
And the Schrödinger update was fun because I
succeeded into explaining how to use 3D complex numbers without
ever solving the Schrödinger wave equation.
So from my point of view it was a great week:
Debunking weirdo's like people who believe in
string theory & at the same time giving the green light for
usage of 3D complex numbers for constructing those very difficult
atomic & molecular orbitals.
It truly was a geek week! Till updates.
(10 April 2016) The last few days I have been
writing stuff for the third post on the Schrödinger wave equation
from quantum mechanics using higher dimensional complex
This update is for posting the teaser
Item 1) Teaser picture for third post on the
Schrödinger wave equation.
Item 1) Teaser
picture for third post on the Schrödinger wave equation.
More or less without thinking in the first
post on the Schrödinger equation on the other website I said you
should use complex numbers from the main cone in order to craft
all those beautiful atomic & molecular electron orbitals...
Later that week I was cleaning my living room
and came across that old dirty piece of paper, and yes it was
true: A long time ago I already decided you cannot solve the
Schrödinger wave equation using 3D complex numbers.
It was clear I had acted like a fool because
you cannot say 'use the main cone' if in a wider sense it will
But now some time later I am almost ready
with composing the third post.
The math itself was developed over two years back by me and for
myself speaking it was very rewarding to do it once
For example in the next teaser picture you
see the plusses and minusses of the three basis vectors. My
complicalted exponential curve goes through all these six end
That was a major math victory at the time leaving all those so
called 'professional math professors' far behind in a cloud of
For myself speaking it was nice to read all
that old stuff again; because there is more than 2 years between
it I could also see how my own brain works...
In a few days it all will be ready and posted
on the new website:
(06 April 2016) Yesterday I came across that
video with the nice title 'Magnets in the sky' and may be I could
find a bit more reasoning as why electrons are the long sought
But what I found was the most utterly and
totally stupid explanation of how permanent magnets
Item 1) For whatever reason, iron does line
up it's electrons at 11.34 min.
Item 1) For whatever
reason, iron does line up it's electrons at 11.34 min.
This guy physics professor Bryan Gaensler
tells more or less the most retarted explanation that is out
there. He is not the only one, I have seen MIT profs doing this
too but the way Bryan puts it is just so mindbreaking
If you think about it, Bryan thinks the
electrons are glued into a fixed position and that is the way
permanent magnets work.
He compares wood to iron, observes in wood
electrons have spins in all directions while in iron 'for whatever
reason' (sic!!!!!) the electrons are aligned.
I have to say I am more or less speechless as
why this retard gets a government paid salary. As stupid as he
pumps it up, he is classified as a 'creationist'. You know one of
those people that think the earth is created in six day and the
bible is in fact a scientific piece of work.
It is just so utterly fucking stupid, I stop
talking about this retard.
Source of the screenshot picture:
in the Sky, Prof Bryan Gaensler (aka the fundamental retard)
This explanation is 100% retarded as only the
people of the universities can come up with.
Luckily as an antidote to this sheer 100%
retardization process I posted reason number 25
into the magnetic page.
Let's leave it with that. Till
(01 April 2016) The 3D complex numbers seem
to be faring well in the diverse search engines but the fact that
electrons are not magnetic dipoles is much more of an abandoned
So in this update I only repost a picture of
me holding a bunch of those powerful new neodymium magnets against
a 6 € old television.
Item 1) The Lorentz force only goes that
Item 1) The Lorentz
force only goes that far...
It is just a repost of a picture from some
time ago and at the same time I perfectly understand how deep the
science of physics is married with the idea you cannot make
But each and every electron in our universe
is a magnetic monopole, if you want this statement a bit less
extreme you can say electrons carry a net magnetic charge.
By now, if you are a professional physics
professor you are already on the verge of vomiting, I am well
aware of how you behave and why you behave.
Let me not do difficult and just repost my
old photo of holding this stack of strong magnets against a small
television screen and trying to explain what I see using the ideas
behind the Lorentz force:
If you click on the picture you get a bigger
version of it but in this small one you already see the Lorentz
force at work: it is that rotating thing going round using the
rigth hand rule.
Unexplained is the circular spot where no
electrons land on the television screen.
Present day physics in the year 2016 cannot
explain this empty electron spot.
End of this update, till updates.
(24 March 2016) Six days back I made a small
advertisement for the woodshop Dikhout that sells countless fine
woods from all over the world. But this does not mean all wood
from regular shops like Hornbach is worthless.
Item 1) In defense of Hornbach wood.
Item 1) In defense of
In the picture below you see a piece of a
wooden beam, bought it about a year ago and it was only 8 € for
about 3 meter of beam. That is dirt cheap, beside being cheap it
is already flattened and shaved.
The only disadvantage is that it is kinda pale, in the past it was
easy with a finish containing petrol and stuff to get a far
stronger contrast in the grain of the wood. But at present day
most paint is water based and that does not improve the grain of
On top you see an unfinished piece of wood
and directly below I brought a bit of contrast in it. How to make
this kind of wood a bit more beautiful?
Very simple: You make you own water based
paint with two pieces of steel wool (wash out the soap carefully)
and some vinegar. I used cleaning vinegar because it is a bit
stronger. You put it in a jar and put the lid loosely on it.
After about a day or five it is ready to use, filter it through a
paper coffee filter or something like that.
It is important you take enough experiments because this stuff
acts different on different kinds of wood. After five days the
paint is very strong, I had to dilute it to 25% of it's original
After painting you can sandpaper it unit you get what you wanted.
The piece of wood below is some plywood, you
see a small gray spot, so you see it works very different going
from one kind of wood to another. I do not like the gray color,
but that is for every one themselves to decide.
Again dilute it enough, the first time I
tried this the wood turned into pure black and that was a pity
because without the paint it looked better and I could not
So experiment on small pieces of wood that
you do not need anyway...
(21 March 2016) Yesterday I finished reason
number 24 as why spin half particles are in fact magnetic
monopoles, or if you think such particles are always spinning very
fast without any reason: they have a net magnetic value.
That is the item for today:
Item 1) Reason 24: Energy distribution in
Item 1) Reason 24:
Energy distribution in cosmic rays.
Where the spinning electron pair explaining
dia-magnetism is the smallest thing based on the idea of electrons
being magnetic monopoles, the behavior of charged particles in
inter-galactic and galactic magnetic fields is, until now, the
greatest structure found that drives the behavior of cosmic
In the next picture you se an impression of
our Milky Way and a few years back the high energy satellite Fermi
found two giant lobes perpendicular on the center of the Milky Way
and there was significant more gamma rays coming from that part of
Gamma rays are the highest energy rays we
know of, it is thought they are produced by cosmic rays and
contrary to the name cosmic rays are not rays at all but very energetic
Cosmic rays (particles) is also a bucket name
for a wide variety of particles, the lower energy ones come from
our sun in those violent corona mass ejections and for those high
energy stuff the professional physics professors have no good
That is understandable: If you think that
electrons are magnetic dipoles it will never cross your mind they
are accelerated by magnetic fields. In that case you will only
think they are accelerated by electrical fields.
Well that is a choice they made every day
again in favor of the prophet Maxwell (may peace be upon the
prophet Maxwell). Long before the electrons were discovered the
prophet decided magnetic monopoles do not exist and until this day
this is part of the Holy Scriptures of the religion named
Let's leave it with that, here is the teaser
picture for reason number 24:
Of course the pink/purple stuff is only
showing the space where the gamma rays are coming from. As usual
click on the picture to land on the magnetic page.
Joke of the day: If you know a professional
physics professor in person, just ask this person how to explain
such giant lobes of 25.000 light years high...
(18 March 2016) About one week back I took a
look at the amount of pictures I made since I started that new
Indeed fresh picture production was so high I thought 'let's take
a little holiday from that'.
Item 1) Let's take a holiday from all that
math and stuff.
Item 1) Let's take a
holiday from all that math and stuff.
Beside hobby's like brewing beer, riding the bicycle
& tiny amounts of published math, every year I also make a few
pieces of wood furniture. Here you see a picture of my latest
piece of furniture; a new book shelf that replaces the old
On the left of the picture you see two new
The thing on top of the barrel is supposed to
be my very first table saw sled. With a sled like this you do not
need to have your hands very close to the sawing blade, so this
brings in a bit of safety.
Underneath the sled is a barrel, that was a
woodworking project from about 8 years ago and now I am going to
turn it into the Cauchy integral formula with the help of lots of
epoxy resin and some prints of the new Cauchy integral
I would like to make a free advertisement for
the guy where I mostly buy my wood.
The locals here in the city of Groningen likely know the new
bridge known as the Oslo bridge. If you come from the kernel of
the city, after the bridge you go to the left and park your car at
The guy from Dikhout has wood that is very
very hard to find at places like Hornbach, Praxis or whatever
'wood retailers' that are out there to serve the public need for
End of this update, if I succeed with the
Cauchy barrel may be some more photo's will be added. Till
(09 March 2016) Added to the page on magnetism
are two more reasons as why electrons & other spin half
particles are magnetic monopoles.
Since the very last reason involves also diamagnetism of DIY at
home made plasma, I finally had a good reason the post that
picture of the levitating frog...
Item 1) The levitating frog.
Item 1) The
Reason 22 is the so called Birkeland
currents, I never heard of them but these currents stream from the
sun outwards to the earth and stuff. I found a perfect very old
photo, likely made by Birkeland himself, it shows a toy model of
our earth bombarded by electrical currents.
At the end of reason 22 I post a link to a
video that shows some guy making DIY plasma at home and he is
doing experiments with strong permanent magnets. In reason 23 I
discuss the results of that person in detail because the plasma
particles that are diamagnetic behave perfectly as one should
expect when electrons are magnetic monopoles.
But if you would ask a professional physics
professor about how to explain diamagnetism, you get answers
1) Diamagnetic materials contain no unpaired
2) If atoms have only electron pairs, they become diamagnetic, or;
3) It atoms are stripped from the unpaired electrons, those ions
Stuff like that is not an explanation, at
best it is a correct observation or description about when you can
expect diamagnetism. But it is not an explanation.
Click on the picture to land at reason 22 as
why electrons are magnetic monopoles:
This frog was levitated at some Dutch
university, you know one of those places where they are overpaid
and think they understand electrons using advanced math...
Let's leave it with that. Till
(03 March 2016) Weirdly enough my six
dimensional complex numbers are a hot topic when it comes to
Google picture searches. That is our item for today:
Item 1) Why do the 6D complex numbers score
Item 1) Why do the 6D
complex numbers score so high?
The six dimensional numbers combine the 2D
complex plane and my own invention of 3D numbers in a very
straightforward way, so why are they so successful?
Likely it is the 'complex plane' because
people from universities and stuff know what the complex plane
Of course it is a great honor to arrive at
search result number 3, but for me who has published vast amounts
of math that has gone unnoticed, I don't give a shit.
After having said that, look at the screen
shot & after that I will give you the link to what started it
End of this update, click on the pic to land
on the post outlining the 6D complex numbers using only 2D &
3D complex numbers.
(25 Feb 2016) Added is reason number 21 as
why spin half particles are magnetic monopoles, that is our item
Item 1) The way magnetic mirrors work in
Item 1) The way
magnetic mirrors work in plasma containment.
Just go the magnetics page here
and enjoy reading reason number 21 for spin half particles being
the long long sought magnetic monopoles.
(22 Feb 2016) Just finished a new math update
under the title The Cone Theorem.
That is the item for this update:
Item 1) The Cone Theorem.
Item 1) The Cone
I found a very beautiful way to classify all
subspaces of the 3-dimensional complex number space such that if
you multiply by an imaginary unit like j, all stuff gets rotated
by a fixed amount.
This also adds a new layer of geometric
properties on the 3D complex and circular number systems. It has
to be remarked that I found it because the preprint archive
article from Slomi Jacobi gave me the idea to investigate this
stuff a little bit.
Here is a link to the preprint archive:
a novel 3D hypercomplex number system
The new update is 12 pages long and placed in
four of the higher dimensional complex numbers. If you click
on the teaser picture you land directly on the new update:
The applet I used for these pictures is the
Polyray applet from the WIMS archive of applets. The next one is
from the university of Leiden but there are more around the world.
Likely you must search a little bit:
Ok, that was it for today. Till
(17 Feb 2016) Another reason why electrons
and protons are magnetic monopoles. This time it is from the
geniussus of MIT, believe it or not but via simulations on giant
super computers they found that there are two types of plasma
Item 1) One step closer to fusion power.
Item 1) One step
closer to fusion power.
The title of this item is the same as the
video from MIT, for reasons of being very sarcastic I hold on to
this title. This is now year three of me talking about electrons
and stuff being the long sought magnetic monopoles and year in
year out on a global scale all university people stay
That proves a lot of things, things like
being stupid, being arrogant, not understanding your own
profession, being a bunch of fucking cowards and so on and so on.
The list of problems these people have is like an endless
And always this bragging like 'we follow the
scientific method', if for just once they did that instead of that
endless river of nonsense about electrons that are spin half and
magnetic dipoles at the same time.
There is no proof for that, the scientific
method is not used for about 106 years since electrons were first
discovered... These people live in a fantasy world, a lot of the
common knowledge is correct but a few important details stay wrong
year in year out...
Click on the picture to land on reason number
step closer to nuclear fusion
Till updates. Extra update from 19
It is also funny to read the news from the
MIT source itself, for myself speaking I consider it also more or
less funny when on 21 Dec I explained the root source of plasma
instability via spin half particles being magnetic monopoles in at
most two hours. It took the MIT weirdo's 37 days on a giant super
computer to find similar results. The only problem is: the MIT
weirdo's still think electrons are magnetic dipoles...
Well, good luck with it.
Here is the MIT news link: New
finding may explain heat loss in fusion reactors
Till update my dear reader.
(15 Feb 2016) Only added Reason number 19 as
why spin half particles are in fact magnetic monopoles. This
reason is the temperature of the corona of our beloved sun. And
since this temperature is about 100 times as high as the outer
layers of the sun, only a fool would hang on to stupid stuff like
electrons are magnetic dipoles...
Click on the above picture to land on the
19-th reason as why spin half particles are all magnetic
(12 Feb 2016) I was busy doing other things
so only this evening I became aware of the announcement that
gravity waves are discovered. Give or take it looks like a solid
breakthrough, so why am I not dancing on the table?
Very simple: I dance on the wooden floor
because years back I had to repair the table and I know how weak
it actually is. I am not going to dance on a weak structure like
Item 1) China has also a record breaking new
when it comes to nuclear fusion.
Item 1) China has
also a record breaking new when it comes to nuclear fusion.
On the fourth February of this month I poked
fun at those German scientists from the Max Planck Institute about
how their Stellarator nuclear fusion reactor will never ever work
because they are in denial when it comes to the properties of the
particles that make up the plasma.
The Stellarator folks managed to get the
plasma to about 80 million degrees Celcius for about 250
I informed them this project will blow up in
their arrogant faces...
Did I know that the Chinese were also hunting
down nuclear fusion the wrong way?
No, until this day I was not aware of any Chinese stuff using the retarded
Tokamak design to craft nuclear fusion.
It makes me smile because after all the
Chinese have a new endurance record:
102 seconds of stable plasma.
Funny link from a website under the name
CHINA'S EXPERIMENTAL FUSION REACTOR HITS MAJOR MILESTONE
HOTTER THAN THE INTERIOR OF THE SUN
All those circular nuclear fusion reactor are
self destructive by design because the scientists on a global
scale refuse to understand how spin half particles behave inside
magnetic fields. Let's leave it with that, till
(10 Feb 2016) I opened page
4 in the higher dimensional complex numbers on this website.
But now I have that new website known as http://3dcomplexnumbers.net/
my estimation is that I will publish only the more hardcore stuff
on page 4.
All soft stuff will go to the new website.
Item 1) Teaser picture about the seven
properties of the number alpha.
Item 1) Teaser
picture about the seven properties of the number alpha.
On the other website I said lately I would
post a post on the more or less elementary properties of the
number alpha. But while writing that it became a bit too long and
at the same time I had not opened up page
4 on this website.
So combining the stuff, I posted 3 teaser
pictures on the new website while publishing the real meat in page
4. For me it is a great honor to place my fist at the heads of all
those incompetent math professors with writing down just another
These incompetent shitholes known as
'professional math professors' often state that the most beautiful
equation they know is the Euler identity.
And as such, if they did not react all these
years upon similar identities, it is clear these people are
incompetent to the bone. Let's leave it with that.
End of this update, till updates.
(07 Feb 2016) You know I have a so called
'smart tv', it is not really smart because for example you cannot
disable cookies and as such a channel like Youtube always goes on
where I left. So I am always rewarded with fresh attacks from
scientists on creationist and vice versa. That is the short item
Item 1) A non-black crow, creationism and
Item 1) A non-black
crow, creationism and evolution.
Here in Europe it is completely absent but in
the USA you have all these fights between people that think the
bible is literally true in every point an comma versus the
standard view that life always evolves if needed.
For myself speaking, I think that religious
thought is an important evolutionary trait that after a long long
time gave rise to scientific institutions.
Today I was riding my noble iron horse and I
was in a village named Southhorn (that is Zuidhorn for the locals)
and I passed that strange looking crow. The crow had clearly
non-black feathers but it did not look ill or so. On the contrary,
for a crow it observed standard behavior; these birds are always
But I could make this photo:
I have no clue as why this bird has lost this
amount of black stuff.
I have no idea if this is a genetic thing, so it is unknown if
this is evolution under your nose at work.
Creationalists see the work of the Almighty
in each and every aspect of life; for example genetics explained
Very simple: the Intelligent Designer simply uses the same sets of
genes while creating different kinds of species with it. After
that those species never evolve further...
And if you would show them the nice new zika
virus that wrecks havoc in the brains of babies, it is not a virus
that evolves but surely must be a punishment by the Almighty
because so many people believe in evolution.
But on the science front you can find much of
those examples too:
Plenty of professional physics people think
that if an electron circles a nucleus once, it has reversed the
magnetic spin. So that only after two times going around it is in
the same spin state again...
They never say that the electrical charge of
an electron oscillates in a similar fashion because even
creationalists instantly see that this is nonsense.
This is the end of my religious sermon
discussing evil creationists and demon scientists while looking at
a non-black crow flying around in Southhorn...
(04 Feb 2016) Two days back in the magnetic
html page I posted reason number 18 as why electrons must be
magnetic monopoles. In it we look at why oxygen is para-magnetic
and we observe it must be the unpaired electrons that are causing
this para-magnetism. So here is Reason
Today we poke fun at the Stellarator people
from the Max Planck institute, Germany:
Item 1) Poking fun at people that believe in
Item 1) Poking fun at
people that believe in electron spin.
First a correction: In the previous update on
the Stellarator fusion reactor I told you that it took 19 years to
build. Now there is also a lot of info out there that says it was
It is not that relevant, likely the planning started 19 years ago
and the actual building was started 9 year ago.
What is relevant is that these people are
building a fusion reactor where all particles in the plasma are
supposed to follow the magnetic field lines, yet all those years
these people never realize only magnetic monopoles follow magnetic
I mean; how fucked up stupid can you
I am not going to explain for a second time
as why these ring shaped fusion reactors are all unstable by
definition. If the Max Planck institute people are to fucked up
stupid to understand my 18 reasons as why electrons are magnetic
monopoles, it is their problem and not mine...
Yesterday Angela Merkel pushed the button for
the second experiment and the temperature was impressive: about 80
million degrees Celcius for about 0.25 seconds.
But once more it was claimed that in the
coming months they will try to let the thing run for 30 minutes or
1800 seconds. On top of that these strange people say that this is
a preparation for a continuous operational fusion vessel.
Well, for myself speaking I am very
interested what happens if you accelerate your electrons and
protons second in second out. My gut feeling says these fusion
vessels are instable by definition.
But let's wait a few more months and see if
indeed the whole thing will blow up in their arrogant faces.
In the long run, what is the lesson the
profession of physics can learn from this?
Now very simple; if from day one after the
Stern-Gerlach experiment you put weird names on the observed behavior,
weird names like 'intrinsic spin' you cannot make any significant
progress because your mind does not grasp what is going on.
Funny wiki link: Wendelstein
Till updates my dear reader.
(27 Jan 2016) Two more reasons as why
electrons are in fact magnetic monopoles & that is today's
Item 1) Two more reasons as why electrons are
Item 1) Two more
reasons as why electrons are magnetic monopoles.
I arrived at reason number seventeen as why
electrons are in fact magnetic monopoles, this time I selected the
diamagnetic properties of things like wood or water that are
always repelled by all magnetic fields.
And I do not need to use fancy math that no
professional math professor understands, it is basic stuff like
nature is always seeking to minimize energy levels.
And minimizing energy levels seems to be a
perfect explanation as why those strong permanent magnets always repel
stuff like wood and water...
Just read it at the magnetic
End of this update, have a nice life or try
to get one. Till updates.
(20 Jan 2016) Yesterday on the preprint
archive I found a very interesting article:
On a novel 3D hypercomplex number system
Ok the name is a bit over the top, there is
nothing to 'hyper' about 3D complex numbers. Anyway now for the
first time I have some evidence I was not the first: it is claimed
that the original author found the 3D numbers back in
Once more this proves it is better to avoid
all contacts with university people because university people are
like one dimensional people only interested in getting more tax
payer money and their rankings in their publication
In this update I will dissect the weirdo's at
CERN hunting for so called magnetic monopoles. That is our item
for this update:
Item 1) Trashing the torque hypothesis on
Item 1) Trashing the
torque hypothesis on electron spin.
Long before the discovery of the electron
scientists already concluded that magnetic monopoles could not
exist. So when electrons were discovered about 110 years ago,
despite them being electrical monopoles having an electrical
charge, it was already forbidden to treat them the same.
So even when the Stern-Gerlach experiment
came along, electrons were still viewed as being magnetic dipoles.
And they had a serious problem to explain:
Why did the beam of silver ions split into two?
This was a serious problem because it was
forbidden to say that it was magnetic monopole stuff that caused
the whole thing, therefore the concept of 'intrinsic spin' was
Furthermore this spin is always up or down,
but why do they say this?
Now when it is up or down they talk about a vertical applied
When the spin is left or right they talk about a horizontal
magnetic field applied.
In that way you can always avoid talking
about magnetic charge that can be measured in all kinds of
magnetic fields. Because if electrons have a magnetic charge, the
orientation of the magnetic field applied should not matter that
Experimental validation of electrons having
Click on the next picture: the 3 electron
cannons of the old color television spit out electrons all the
same. Yet my 3 strong neodymium magnets ensure there is a circular
disk where all electrons are void void void & more void.
Now you can come up with a very complicated
theory using torque explaining this while the more down to earth
explanation simply says: This proves electrons carry magnetic
Click on the picture for an
This is the most cheap experiment disproving
all that torque stuff: It uses a second hand television for 6 €
while I only needed 3 of those new neodymium magnets or about 25
€. So for only about 30 Euro you can poke fun at those thousands
and thousands of overpaid CERN physics people hunting the magnetic
monopole in their own way.
Let's leave it with that, till updates.
(17 Jan 2016) This update was not planned:
while reaching high in the search engine count I discovered I made
two terrible typo's!
So instead of me poking fun at the physics
professors like "hey how are your dipole electrons do
today?", I find myself back in the corner where the beatings
Item 1) Correction of my 07 Dec 2015 update.
Item 1) Correction of
my 07 Dec 2015 update.
Since I have my new website about once I week
I do some internet search engine searches like '3D complex
numbers' and just see what nonsense pops up.
I am very satisfied because results from 3dcomplexnumbers.net
pop up high enough. Not on page 1 of course, there are all of
those websites out there to serve the general public to answer all
kinds of questions science related, ok ok I accept they hang out
on page one of the search results...
But on Google pictures, last week I was
hanging out at picture number six.
And guess what? It was a teaser picture for the 6D complex numbers
as constructed from 2D and 3D complex numbers...
Not a bad result, but on inspection pure
panic was on my behalf!!!
There were two typo's in it, two minus signs
that were supposed to be there were AWOL. Of course the people
from the universities will say instantly:
See, just a bit more proof this guy hangs
together from typo's and more weird stuff...
So I corrected my teaser picture and now it
looks like this:
End of this update, have a nice life or try
to get one.
(11 Jan 2016) In the new
page on magnetism I added two more reasons as why electrons
rather likely are magnetic monopoles. This makes the item for this
Item 1) Superconductivity explained via
Superconductivity explained via magnetic monopoles.
Just a teaser picture, you see the so called
Meisner effect: If you place a permanent magnet above a
superconducting piece of material (mostly metals) it starts to levitate.
So it has a high Harry Potter content, it is
just like in the background Harry Potter is waiving his magic wand
whispering 'Leviosa at infinitum'.
(05 Jan 2016) The last week I have been
studying superconductivity type 1 and a bit of type 2. Once more
the idea that electrons are magnetic monopoles is once more the
last idea standing... But this item is about poking fun at the
professional physics professors & about wishing you a happy
Item 1) Poking fun at the ppp.
Item 1) Poking fun at
In my house it is well known that ppp
(professional physics professors) think that electrons are
In my house it is also well known that there is no experimental
proof for that anyway; the thing that comes most close is the Stern-Gerlach
thing and what do the ppp say when talking about this
They often say: For some strange reason
nature does not allow us to measure electron spin in more than one
They often say: Electron pairing is a quantum thing.
They say this and they say that, if they use math they come only
up with 2D complex numbers, so for me this is a bunch of toddlers
playing in the sand pit wearing their diapers while carrying sand
from one place to the other.
These weirdo's with their vertical Sz
measurement of electron spin, these people are crazy without
In the next photo you see 'spin measurement'
around the circle, or to put it mildly: In an infinite amount of
directions... And when measured in an infinite amount of
directions, the electrons still behave the
If you click on the picture you get a larger
version. Anyway now we have these strong new neodymium magnets for
just 30 €, we can do experiments that measure electron spin simultaneously
in a 360 degree fashion.
Till updates & have a happy life or try
to get one.
(30 Dec 2015) Happy celebrations tomorrow
& do not forget to drink a gigantic amount of beer, a tiny
amount of wine or a very tiny amount of Vodka! Cheers to
I just finished the latest update on why
electrons are magnetic monopoles, here
it is or click on any of the 3 teaser pictures from the previous
Till updates & see ya next year!
(29 Dec 2015) Bah, I did sprain my ankle so I
do not feel like dancing or so. Since I stopped eating bread and
the poisonous gluten I did not have any joint problems for over
1.5 years. And it is also my own fault; I should not have gone exercising
yesterday because that only made it worse and now I have a nice
But there is also good news; I can confirm
that with these new neodymium magnets you can both attract and repel
electrons. So a small update on that.
Item 1) Confirmed by experiment: electrons
are not magnetic dipoles.
Item 1) Confirmed by
experiment: electrons are not magnetic dipoles.
In the 26 update I showed you a teaser
picture with a black ring where all electrons were missing. Now
that was caused by south pole electrons attracted to the north
pole of the neodymium bipolar magnet.
Below you see the opposite, the neodymium
south pole is repelling electrons, to be precise: monopole
magnetic south poles. The shape of the missing electrons is
explained by the fact the electrons come in with an angle at the
corner of the screen.
You can also see a bit more light under the
magnet tip, these are extra north pole monopole electrons. For me
this is very important because this way everybody can check self
for under 50 € that I am in the right.
Because if we wait until the first university
confirms results like this, after 500 years we will still be
All in all these simple experiments with a
small second hand television together form reason number 13 that
electrons are the long sought magnetic monopoles.
This week I will update the magnetic page
with reason nr 13.
(26 Dec 2015) I bought myself a second hand
particle accelerator a few days ago and combined with those new neodymium
magnets I bought one month ago we can do some physical
Item 1) For 6 € I bought that second hand
Item 1) For 6 € I
bought that second hand particle accelerator.
This machine is perfect, it makes all my
dreams about electrons being magnetic monopoles come out. Now the
second hand particle accelerator that I bought for just 6 € is
also known under the name 'color television' and mine is from the
Dutch brand known as Phillips.
But old fashioned televisions are also
quantum stuff things because the old tube televisions had 3
electron cannons in them and a truly suburb copper wiring to guide
the electrons to the right place in the right time.
Anyway to make some long story short, the
next teaser picture is also a teaser picture for all those
overpaid physics professors. Please explain the circular disk
where no electron at all reaches the screen...
So my dear physics professors, explain in
long and exhausting detail as why we have such strange black
circular spots where one type of electrons is clearly missing in
our very simple physics experiment.
As you see on inspection: at the end of this
magnet stuff some electrons are in, after that you get that
circular band of no electrons hitting the screen and after that
the whole screen if filled with electrons that hit the
A bit more detail:
Where are the electrons gone?
Why do they not hit the screen?
Stuff like this only fits inside a theory of
reality where all spin half particles are also magnetic
End of this update, till updates.
(of these homepage files).