|
(14 April 2018) The last days there suddenly
is a tiny bit more news of the 'pee pee tape' related to a visit
from donald trump to Moscow. As the rumor went, donald wanted a
room and had some prostitutes pee over each other...
The whole thing was secretly taped and as
such could be an explanation as why the Russians have so much sway
over donald trump.
I always considered this a bag of nonsense,
if it is true that we only see a few prostitutes peeing on each
other, why should a person like donald be embarresed?
That is our first item of this update, in the
second item a few more reasons as why electrons cannot be magnetic
dipoles...
Anyway here we go:
Item 1) How does donald trump get his
potassium?
Item 2) A zero field splitting of electron spin?
Item 1) How does
donald trump get his potassium?
Potassium is an important element for your
body, daily enough intake via enough veggies is important because
your body cannot hold on it. You can't store potassium, you pee it
out.
Some time back last year James Comey was
fired from his CIA post and now he has a book coming out and one
of the details seems to be that donald asked James Comey to start
an investigation into the 'pee pee tape' and the conclusion should
be that it was all not true.
When those pee pee rumors emerged for the
first time, after a few minutes of thinking about this relatively
weird news I understood what could be on the pee pee tape:
That was not donald trump ordering a few
hookers to urinate over each other, no no much more likely it was
that the present US president donald trump was on hands an knees
and actively drinking as much of the stuff as possible.
Now with the new information coming in that
donald trump wanted an 'investigation' into the pee pee tape from
Moscow, after waiting long it just looks more and more likely that
donald trump did indeed swallow a lot of urine while he was on
hands and knees...
_________
After having said that, it is a pity that it
will likely take a few more years before the pee pee tape finally
will surface. On the positive side, if there is one pee pee tape
that is talked about, what else can there be?
Let's leave it with that.
Item 2) A zero field
splitting of electron spin?
On 7 and 9 April I posted two more reasons as
why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles.
The 7 April update is about the Majorama
fermions as found by the Dutch university of Delft (I still don't
think these particles are their own anti particle my dear Delft
folks).
The 9 April update is a bit more from the
chemical sciences; even in the absence of any applied magnetic
field there still is a difference in electron spin state.
It has a beautiful name: Zero field splitting...
Scroll down on page four of the magnetic
stuff as it is covered on this website:
monopole_magnetic_stuff03.htm
The funny detail in the last reason is that
even in the absence of a magnetic field there still are two
kinds of electrons, that once more validates that electrons do
not have spin but charge, that is magnetic charge so to say...
Ok, that was it for this update. Till
updates.
(08 April 2018) It is not my task to comment
upon every stupid video out there about food and diets, but after
viewing a video riddled with nonsense from the channel Seeker I
decided to put some side notes to that stream of nonsense...
The Seeker people, let's name them Mr. and
Mrs. Stoopid come up with all those nonsense stuff like 'Your
brain runs on glucose so you need to eat carbs' while in practice
because glucose is such an important molecule for your body, your
very own body can produce plenty of glucose...
It is just all so stupid, I hope to keep it
short but here we go:
Item 1) The most stupid Seeker video ever!
Item 1) The most
stupid Seeker video ever!
In the year 2011 my body weight had grown to
109 kg and because year in year out I was only gaining weight I
decided to do something about this ever growing problem.
So at first only some calorie restriction and
more exercise and kilo by kilo the fat burned slowly away. In the
meantime I began to study the stuff around food and how it all
affects your body.
At some point in time I did hit a severe
barrier; I could not get below 88 kg of body weight. Even riding
your bicycle for 500 kilometer a week could not break down this
barrier.
In the meantime all of a sudden I developed a
serious gluten allergy so I simply was forced to stop eating all
that wheat stuff. That's it in a nutshell but year in year out I
am very stable in body weight ever since.
Compared to all those diets out there, the
way I eat resembles mostly the keto diet. The keto diet is
basically very simple: keep your insulin levels low so that your
body has the capability to burn fat.
If you eat too much carbs or protein in the
form of meat, blood sugar levels rise and at that point in time
your body can't burn fat. The present day obesity epidemic is not
about people eating too much but much more the food they eat
prevents their bodies to burn fat...
__________
After having said that, here are a few of the
very stupid things Mr. and Mrs. Stoopid explain to us as being
'scientific' or 'under strict oversight' and it is just all soo
stupid:
1) Eating fat, my arteries hurt says Mr.
Stoopid.
Comment: If you can't burn the body fat also
dietary fat can become bad for your health.
2) Glucose, your brain and body runs of
glucose says Mrs. Stoopid.
Comment: Glucose is a very simple molecule
that your body can easily make plenty plenty plenty.
3) Giants amounts of meat. For some strange
reason Mr. and Mrs. Stoopid seem to think that maintaining a low
insulin level commutes with eating gigantic amounts of meat.
Comment: If your body cannot process huge
amounts of meat, your body will respond by breaking the meat down
into sugars raising your insulin levels.
4) Starvation. Here is where Mrs. Stoopid
gets really fanatic, only via starvation and all of that ridiculous
keto stuff you can loose weight...
Comment: Eating no food by carb hoarders for
more than six hours is known as the horrible process of
'starvation'. Yes, after about six hours your glucose reserves are
depleted and because you did eat too much carbs to begin with you
feel very very starved. And you crave food deeply...
A normal person would access the body fat for
energy and would find it very strange to name this
'starvation'.
Only carb eaters use the word starvation, if
you are behind that diaper wearing phase in your life it is simply
'fasting'.
Here are Mr. and Mrs. Stoopid explaining
their precious insights about how to feed the brain, click on the
picture for the stupid video:
Source:
Does the Keto Diet Actually Work?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoIW7OARyT0
Wow man, I am glad I made it mentally sane at
the end of this update... ;)
End of this update.
(02 April 2018) Lately I found a nice video
summing up all the problems related to when you eat stuff your
body cannot digest, in particular gluten.
At present day gluten is a bit of a laughing
stock for a lot of people because they never drop dead after
consuming bread or other wheat related products. But the effects
it has on your body build up over time, the first half century of
my like I did eat bread on a daily basis and I too never thought
it would do me harm.
It was just food, I trusted it...
That is the item for this update:
Item 1) Make or buy some gluten and take
experiments for yourself.
Item 1) Make or buy
some gluten and take experiments for yourself.
Gluten is something your body just cannot
digest, gluten is not one molecule or protein but has more
components. For myself speaking I view gluten as a collection of
anti rot components that the wheat grain uses to survive the
winter in order to sprout and grow and live for another generation
of wheat.
So if this is true, if gluten is also an anti
rot component for the form of life known as wheat, it should also
be that almost no other form of life can break it down.
I checked that more or less abundantly in the
past. I bought a kilo of 100% gluten for just five Euro, also I
washed wheat dough out until you are left over with the gluten.
I did put out chunks of gluten in plastic bags together with some
water and, for example, some French cheese. Or with beer yeast, or
a combination of cheeses and beer yeast or even bread
yeast...
At one point in time I even placed a plastic
bag in my garden, let it open so all kinds of microscopic life
could enter the plastic bag.
After that I started using fermentation
bottles because that gave such nice looking photographs where I
could make my fancy pictures from.
Anyway, all experiments I have done to make
nature break down the gluten always were at least 3 months until
the proteins were broken down so small that the stuff became a
liquid.
The human body is not made for digesting
stuff over a time span of 3 months or more so we simply shit all
problematic stuff out and live happily ever after.
Ha ha ha, the funny thing about gluten is
that the daily consumption of wheat related products gives you a
leaky gut so that all kinds of garbage can get into your
body.
But this post is not about repeating what is
already out there in knowledge about what can happen if you eat
too many stuff your body just cannot digest, think of experiments
for yourself. What form of life can break down the conglomerate of
proteins known as gluten?
You can get gluten via washing out a fresh
kneaded wheat dough, after flushing the dough with water for about
40 or 50 minutes it looks like this:
Once you have the pure gluten you can think
of yourself for all kinds of experiments showing human digestion
cannot break it down. Nor other forms of life on this planet.
The leaky gut stuff related to gluten is also
very likely very true, after I changed my diet to anti gluten I
almost had no back pain for about four years. In all years of my
bread eating life I had so much back pains that every year at
least one week I could not ride a bicycle...
And if you eat bread every day, you also have
have at least for some time every day this schematic picture for
your leaky gut problems:
Ok let's call it a day.
The two pictures above came from the next
video:
Is
gluten that bad for your health? | The science
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0La27FNrA4
It is a nice video and with a little smile on
my face I can say I have also found a group of ultra smart
professionals that should eat more gluten: The math professors!
If math professors would eat more gluten and
the rest of the population less gluten I would be in paradise...
;) Thanks for your attention.
Till updates.
(26 March 2018) It is about high time to post
a few new updates on this very homepage. In the previous update I
did not mention it but only posted a link to page
3 on the magnetic stuff (mostly viewing electrons as magnetic
monopoles).
And with a little smile on my face I type
once more down 'electrons viewed as carrying magnetic charge' and
I know that instantly all those professional physics professors
will fast click away to some other website.
These people are shitty to the bone or to put
it more mildly: they are university people...
The last few weeks I have been working on a
general proof for the so called inverse Pythagoras theorem but I
was a bit stupid and first crafted the general proof and only
later tried to look up on the internet about the inverse theorem
of Pythagoras...
It turned out there is no inverse theorem of
Pythagoras, anyway I could find nothing in the public domain.
Anyway this inverse stuff is our first item and the second item is
about a very nice explanation of magnetic domains and the domain
walls of magnetic domains.
Let's go:
Item 1) On the other website: A general
inverse Pythagoras theorem.
Item 2) More on magnetic domain walls that are made of electron
pairs.
Item 1) On the other
website: A general inverse Pythagoras theorem.
For myself speaking I would not classify this
result as a theorem but more like a cute result. But I found that
was of measuring the distance d as used in the cute result
over two decades ago.
On the other hand it was only why some other
guy named the 2D version a 'theorem' I started thinking about this
so for me this cute result is new too...
So theorem yes or no, let history decide! OH
NO: that kind of history is more or less the version of history
that future university people will make of it so may be that is
not a wise thing to desire...
Anyway, here is the link to the cute result
that for the time being goes under the name of The General Inverse
Pythagoras Theorem:
What
is the inverse Pythagoras theorem?
http://3dcomplexnumbers.net/2018/03/20/what-is-the-inverse-pythagoras-theorem/
Here is a screen shot that shows the cute
result:
That's it for this item: cute result or a
full blown theorem? Make up your own mind.
Item 2) More on magnetic
domain walls that are made of electron pairs.
At the beginning of February I watched a
video with Stuart Parkin from IBM talking about so called
racetrack memory where they use nano wires to shift the magnetic
domains inside the nano wire.
This is a way to store information on some
computing device, present day fast memory consumes far to much
energy and this racetrack concept of storing information on nano
wires is very very cute...
Stuart Parkin told that the magnetic domain
wall can only be moved by electrical fields like those inside the
nano wire done by what Stuart calls 'spin polarized electrical
current'. The important detail is that likely Stuart & his IBM
fellows have tried to manipulate the domain walls via magnetic
fields and as such they failed.
The same day I realized what must be going
on:
1) The inside of the magnetic domains have a
surplus of electrons carrying north pole magnetic charge OR as
surplus of south pole magnetic charge on the electron.
The magnetic domains themselves are NEVER magnetic dipoles but
regions with a surplus in one of the two magnetic charges.
2) The domain walls contain much more
electron pairs because all unpaired electrons will be pulled to
some inside of the domain because they are not magnetically
neutral. The electron pair is by definition magnetically neutral
because it is always made up of a south and a north magnetic
charge and as such likes to hang out in the middle where the
Lorentz forces make it spinning around.
Basically that's it: paired electrons are
always by definition magnetically neutral while unpaired electrons
never are magnetically neutral because they carry magnetic
charge...
As such the formation and change of the walls
of magnetic domains is a highly dynamical process, unpaired
electron will tunnel into another magnetic domain if the wall is
too weak and so on and so on.
Here is reason number 57 from two days back:
A
video containing the formation of magnetic domains
The reader is invited to think a bit about
electrons having magnetic charge and as such explain all those
weird phenomena we see around us...
After all it is not my task to convince you
about anything electron related, if your brain is more or less
healthy you will arrive at similar insights...
(Except for the university people of course.)
End of this update.
(10 Feb 2018) Ok, I could talk long and short
about some local earthquakes but I won't.
We leave out all local emotional stuff because we also have to
clean the closet every now and then.
So this is more about the Mathologer who
finally sees the light and the IBM folks who still struggle so
much to understand the elementary basics of electron spin:
Item 1) Finally the Mathologer sees the
light.
Item 2) Magnetic domain walls explained via electron
pairs.
Item 1) Finally the
Mathologer sees the light.
Back in April 2016 after visiting a general
math lecture at the local university here I thought it would be
funny to completely debunk the nonsense from a bunch of Nottingham
physics professors who claimed that the sum of all integers equals
minus 1/12.
They sold nonsense like:
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + .... = -1/12.
And from that it is easy to deduce much more
completely retarded nonsense, for example you can lower every
integer in this sequence by one in order to get the same sum
back:
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... minus
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ... =
0 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ...
But if the last sum also equals -1/12, it has
to be that:
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ... = 0.
If you have a normal functioning brain, I
hope you more or less estimate that if you add the number 1
infinitely many times, the answer is the thing known as
infinity.
To my surprise on a video channel I found the
Mathologer also explaining why this is a bunch of weird math. It
was fun to watch so I placed a small update with his video on this
two year old detail:
Debunking the Euler evaluation of zeta at minus
one.
Let us leave this detail behind us.
Item 2) Magnetic
domain walls explained via electron pairs.
This week I was viewing another video of
Stuart Parkin who is trying to craft so called racetrack memory
for future computers and he is trying to use the spin of electrons
in order to reach his goal.
Of course Stuart Parkin is a strong believer
in electrons having two magnetic poles, just like all the other
professional physics professors.
Let me not lamentate upon the slow acceptance
of electrons carrying a magnetic charge, that is how the human
brain works after all: slow and dumb ;)
Anyway within a few hours of looking at his
video I understood how the magnetic domains in metals like iron
are for real:
The borders as found in iron have much more
electron pairs into them, furthermore each magnetic domain has
either a surplus of north or south electrons carrying the magnetic
charge.
The electron pair is magnetically neutral
while unpaired electrons never are, so when Stuart Parkin informed
me that those magnetic domain walls just not got moved by magnetic
fields, after all that time I had a tiny bit of experimental
validation of my whole magnetic charge idea...
So this is reason number 53 as why electrons
cannot be magnetic dipoles:
Reason 53:
Domain walls of magnetic domains explained (electron pairs).
Here is a picture of
the stuff that is most horribly wrong with the representation of
electron spin as a vector; make up your own mind but I consider
this not correct:
Ok, that was it. Till updates.
(28 Jan 2018) About three weeks back I had a court case
because back in Nov 2016 I was that stupid to park a car on the
parking spot of a handicapped person...
That was stupid of me, I cannot deny that, but I was completely
unaware of the nature of the parking spot because I did not see
the sign.
Anyway I was fined a nice 390 € and because
that is a whole lot of money for something I had not done on
purpose, I decided to appeal.
So I performed all my appealing duties, it
was nice to use the old post method of letters written on paper a
few times, and that was it in let's say Dec 2016.
About half a year later I got the next letter
from the CJBI (that is the Dutch state fine collector, a rather
powerful organization) and my appeal was not taken into
consideration because I failed to handover the letter that said I
could appeal in the name of the car owner...
But I never received a letter telling me to
do so, all I observed was month after month of nothing.
So I appealed against the decision of not
taking up my first appeal and as such we had a court house date of
08 Jan 2018 at 14.00 hours.
For me it was kinda strange to be back in the
local courthouse, so much has changed like for example it is much
harder to bring explosives or metal weaponry to the courthouse...
It was nice to observe how they evolved since I have evolved
myself.
Anyway, beside all those old emotions, later
I found out that at 14.00.52 hours a multiyear long record
earthquake was there just outside the city where the gas pumps of
companies like Shell suck the natural gas from under our living
space.
Therefore in order to promote cognitive
growth in item 1) we try to estimate the average amount of how
much the so called 'bodem daling' will be.
And since this is a local issue, it will be
done in the Dutch language. (Sorry for that.)
Item 1) Wat is eigenlijk de gemiddelde bodem
daling?
Item 1) Wat is
eigenlijk de gemiddelde bodem daling?
Een aantal jaren geleden heb ik eens proberen
te schatten hoeveel de bodem daling in Groningen nu eigenlijk gaat
worden.
De gasproductie is altijd gegeven in het
aantal miljarden kubieke meter, één miljard kubieke meter gas is
precies één kubieke kilometer. Maar 1 kubieke kilometer aan de
oppervlakte onder een druk van 1 atmosfeer (of 1 bar zo je wilt)
neemt diep in de grond veel minder ruimte in.
Nou ik wil niet de hele berekening herhalen,
maar je maakt gewoon gebruik van een nogal eenvoudige gaswet die
zegt dat druk maal volume gedeeld door de temperatuur gelijk is
aan een constante.
In al zijn eenvoud, bij veronderstelde
gelijke temperaturen, bij twee keer zoveel druk heb je half het
oorspronkelijk volume.
Dus ik ga het spul niet herhalen want dan kom
ik weer op een gemiddelde bodem daling uit van 3 tot 6 meter. Je
hoeft niet erg lang na te denken dat dit eigenlijk nogal rampzalig
is en gigantisch duur op de lange termijn...
Ik nodig jullie dus van harte uit om het zelf
eens te proberen, daarbij heb je de volgende gegevens nodig:
1) De cumulatieve aardgaswinning sinds het
begin van de gaswinning in de jaren 60, stel dat is X miljard
kubieke meter aardgas dan is dat dus X kubieke kilometer aardgas
bij een druk die we aan de oppervlakte hebben.
2) Diep in de grond is het warmer, dat laten
we gewoon weg uit de berekening omdat we een CONSERVATIEVE
SCHATTING willen maken. Er zijn namelijk ook allerlei redenen dat
de bodem daling minder zal zijn, bijv als er veel grote rotsen
zijn of hele steenlagen dan kan die bodem daling wel miljoenen
jaren duren.
Nou er zijn eigenlijk geen rotsformaties en gegeven de hogere
temperatuur zal die X kubieke kilometer dus iets meer volume
innemen want hoe warmer het is hoe meer het gas uit zal zetten.
3) Gemiddelde diepte van het gewonnen gas,
dan kun je de druk uitrekenen. Op bijv zes kilometer diepte is de
druk gewoon het gewicht van een kolom aarde daarboven tot de
oppervlakte. Als ik het mij goed herinner gebruikte ik een massa
van 2500 kilo per kubieke meter grond. Dan kun je de zwaartekracht
uitrekenen die je per vierkante meter hebt, dat is dus 6000 maal
2500 maal de lokale gravitatie constante g = 9, 81.
4) Je moet ook de oppervlakte van de
gaswinning weten, volgens mijn geheugen is dat vrij precies 900
vierkante kilometer.
Als mijn schatting van 3 tot 6 meter bodem
daling correct was, dan moet al het gas dat er gewonnen is sinds
de jaren zestig diep in de grond dus ongeveer een volume hebben
van:
900 maal 0,003 = 2,7 kubieke kilometer, tot
maximaal
900 maal 0,006 = 5,4 kubieke kilometer.
__________
Een aantal jaren terug vond ik het eigenlijk
best wel een schokken resultaat. Gelukkig hebben we ook de
universitaire wereld en die deden natuurlijk weer waar ze goed in
zijn:
HELEMAAL NIETS.
Dus geen validatie, geen ontkenning. Gewoon
business as usual en vooral niets doen...
Laten we het daarbij houden behalve een
geinig nieuwtje omtrent een belangrijke aandeelhouder van de NAM
die natuurlijk voor de kosten van de bodem daling zou moeten
opdraaien. Dat is Shell, die suckers beginnen zich terug te
trekken tegen de toekomstige kosten van de Groninger bodem dalind
veroorzaakt door de gaswinning van de Shell suckers themselves.
Dit is van dagblad Trouw:
Shell zet de Nam op
afstand. Wie draait er straks op voor de schade in Groningen?
https://www.trouw.nl/home/shell-zet-de-nam-op-afstand-wie-draait-
er-straks-op-voor-de-schade-in-groningen-~a427ec4b/
En voor het geval je eens hard wilt lachen om
één van die overbetaalde ultra debielen bij Shell: De NAM heeft
poen zat voor alle schade die nog gaat komen. Dat wijf is echt
rand debiel, hier is haar overbetaalde visie:
Shell-topvrouw: NAM financieel robuust genoeg voor rekening aardbevingsschade
https://nos.nl/nieuwsuur/artikel/2214087-shell-topvrouw-nam-financieel-
robuust-genoeg-voor-rekening-aardbevingsschade.html
Waarom kopen die mensen niet een paar zakken
potaarde voor de planten vraagt de topvrouw van Shell zich af.
Daarmee kunnen ze toch makkelijk die bodem daling compenseren?
Toegevoegd op 01 februari, een leuke wiki
zegt dat op dit moment de maximale bodem daling ongeveer 30
centimeter is. En dat is maar in een niet al te groot gebied, niet
in de 900 vierkante kilometer van het totale gaswinnings gebied...
Er zijn dus al giga veel problemen en allerlei kosten bij een
maximale bodemdaling van 30 centimeter.
Als mijn gemiddelde schatting van 3 tot 6 meter uitkomt dan is het
duidelijk dat de meeste problemen nog in de toekomst liggen.
Bodemdaling
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodemdaling
__________
End of this update, till updates.
(10 Jan 2018) Often you hear stuff like 'Do
not use Google search but Duckduckgo because the latter protects
your privacy and for Google you are just a bunch of data'.
People sometimes say 'If you are online,
Google knows who you are'.
There might be some point into this because
with the rise of fake news, last year the echo chamber came to the
foreground meaning websites like facebook and the likes bombard
you with news and advertisements of stuff you have seen
before.
So in this update we do only one search,
namely
calculation of the 7D tau
and we will look at the behavior of the Bing
search from Microsoft, Duckduckgo and the elephant in the room
named Google search.
Item 1) Internet search engine comparison.
Item 1) Internet
search engine comparison.
On 06 Dec last year I posted the way to
calculate this seven dimensional important number on the other
website. Here is the post for those who are into that kind of nice
math:
An important calculation of the 7D number tau (circular
version).
http://3dcomplexnumbers.net/2017/12/06/an-important-calculation-of
-the-7d-number-tau-circular-version/
To my surprise on all three search engines
this post popped up at number one. Some people might remark this
is rather logical since there are not that many webpages with
titles like that. Ok, that is true but there is also a lot of
noise that pops up high in the search results.
Yet, the Bing engine from Microsoft gave only
one result on the first page. Duckduckgo gave also the
introductionary post to the calculation of the 7D tau.
Here is a screen shot:
Now compare this to Google; they give also
the 06 Dec post as number one but also pages of the categories as
I use them on the other website. Categories like 'Exponential
curves' or 'Matrix representation'.
I think it goes too far to classify this as
'echo chamber', it is just better and is what Google always said
they try to do: Making searches more relevant.
For myself speaking I will mainly be using
Google as my default search engine. The fact my userdata might
have some use for Google is fine by me, after all Google gives
also goodies in return like Youtube or Google books.
Of course you must be aware of the
differences between the three main search engines, in the future
the searches stood be relevant and not what some AI guesses you
like to read.
Ok, let's hit the button 'upload changes' and
see you next time!
|
