(16 Sept 2016) Two new reasons as why electrons are magnetic monopoles, or at least carry a net magnetic charge, were posted this week.
Our item of today is about reason 34 because that contains the most imbecile explanation of electron spin as done by overpaid physics professors. 

Item 1) Only imbeciles give imbecile explanations.

 Item 1) Only imbeciles give imbecile explanations.

You can check this explanation for yourself, it is found in the next short video at about 3 minutes in. The guy in the video is  David Awschalom and he is (or was) the head of a spintronics department somewhere on this globe.

Source file of the picture: Spintroncis made easy
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPIbGq634yU  

This is how he looks: 

Now David is not the only physics professor starting the explanation with a spinning earth but he is the fucking head of a spintronics department! 

Furthermore this David claims that this electron spin can point in any direction like it can point to anywhere on a sphere...
But the 1922 Stern-Gerlach experiment said that THIS JUST DID NOT HAPPEN!

So in 94 years of progress in the science of physics these weirdo's still miss the main point: IF IN THE FUCKING STERN-GERLACH EXPERIMENT ELECTRONS GO AWAY FROM THE STRONGEST PARTS OF A MAGNETIC FIELD, THIS IS CAUSED BY REPELLING. 

And if the electron was a magnetic dipole, the thing could never undergo such a strong repelling force. Once you get that my dear but stupid David you also understand spintronic devices like the read and write head in spinning hard disks as we have at present day in our computers...  

I hope that I am not sounding frustrated because on the scale of things nobody dies from physics professors thinking weird and unproven stuff. While for example in the meantime if you look at the food advices from the Dutch Health Council thousands and thousands die every year for no reason at all. 

But the Dutch Health Council has a long history of being on the wrong side of things: In the 1960 we suddenly had to skip the fat and embrace a low fat diet.
Later a lot of people were advised not eating eggs because of cholesterol.
And so on and so on, even now in the year 2016 they advice stop using butter and change to liquid oils... 

In this world there is just never a shortage on idiots in high ranking positions.
Till updates & bake a few eggs in lovely butter.  

(08 Sept 2016) The Health Council of the Netherlands (de Gezondheidsraad) has a multi decade long history of giving the wrong food advices. Last year a new set of guidance's for food choices came out and today we are looking if they still are stupid to the bone yes or no.

Item 1) Check on the Health Council of the Netherlands.

 Item 1) Check on the Health Council of the Netherlands.

Last year new guide lines came out, you can find them in the next link (it is in Dutch of course): 

https://www.gezondheidsraad.nl/sites/default/files/
201524_richtlijnen_goede_voeding_2015.pdf 

In these pages you can find two advices that completely for the full 100% contra dictionary to each other. These two advices are: 

1) Stop drinking liquids that contain sugar, this includes fruit juices.
2) Eat at least 90 gram whole wheat bread a day. 

The idea behind advice 1 is likely that consuming too much sugar leads to too high levels of blood sugar, the body reacts by releasing insulin and as a result most of the consumed sugar turns into body fat.  

This is a very general thing: You can only store fat if insulin levels get elevated. 

The idea behind advice 2 comes from some cohort research that I have no access to but likely they compare whole wheat eaters to refined wheat eaters and indeed you may find a small positive health effect.  

More on blood sugar: Too high levels are poisonous to the human body and in the so called Glycemic index there are a whole lot of foods found and the influence on your blood sugar it has. 

Lot's of people ate a standard amount of food like 50 or 100 grams and this is compared to eating 50 or 100 grams glucose. The amount of blood sugar after consuming glucose is the fixing point labeled 100 (it is an index number). 

The university of Sidney has a perfect database of a lot of foods, you can check the numbers I give to you yourselves over there: 

Glycemic Index Database
http://www.glycemicindex.com/foodSearch.php 

Snickers Australian = 41
Snickers USA = 65
Orange juice = 46
White bread = 70
Whole wheat bread = 75 to 85 

As you see on inspection, the orange juice is relatively innocent compared to the whole wheat bread. Now you might wonder as why whole wheat bread gives an ever higher reading compared to white bread? 

That is because whole wheat is not whole wheat; about 5% of the weight is extra added gluten. Because gluten is stuff that is in wheat naturally by law the millers are not obliged to tell this on the package but you can see it at the price you pay for whole wheat flower:  

Always in every store if you compare the cheapest while wheat flower to the whole wheat it is rather precisely 50 cents more expensive. But hey ha ha ha, the price per kilo gluten is 10€ hence 50 gr of gluten is 50 cents... 

At the Dutch Health Council they think that whole wheat means it is whole wheat but that is wrong, it is a refined product because healthy things like vitamin E are removed and sold to the cosmetics industry while extra gluten is added because otherwise the bread will not rise properly. 

Now what explains the very high index range of 75 to 85?
The extra gluten causes even more very tiny bubbles in the bread so whole wheat bread has more surface area for chemical reactions when it is inside your gut system. 

__________ 

Do you understand why I think the Dutch Health Council is just another load of academic imbeciles? They name the Glycemic index in their report but when it comes to bread they do not use it because it does not fit their ideas upon healthy whole wheat foods... 

And if you ask them about that anti bread sentiment from lately they say: That is just some guru, it is just one person... 

From that reaction, that is broadly held at the Health Council, you can see they are even not capable of judging the stuff you can find in books like Wheat Belly that are written by that 'guru'?

Let me give you a similar reaction from the year 1905: 

Two professional physics professors PPP1 and PPP2 are having a conversation: 

PPP1: I did read a very interesting article about some guy that stated E = mass times the speed of light squared, did you see it too?
PPP2: Yes but I looked it up and there is that guy Albert Einstein, the problem is that he is not a scientist. He is just some fucking clerk at some stupid patent office...
PPP1: Oh I did not know he was not a scientist at all, we better skip that nonsense I just guess.
PPP2: Of course we skip this nonsense, only real scientist make real science and clerks are only there to sharpen the pencils and bring us our coffee. 

And that happened, for over three years nobody said a thing about what is now the most famous physics equation: E = mc^2. 

Ok this update is getting a bit long so let me skip the Alzheimer things because with the Alzheimer things the Dutch Health Council is also not picking up her responsibilities but only talks coward shit year in year out.

Let me leave you with a screen shot of the whole wheat GI index:

There are dozens and dozens more reasons as why these people working at the Dutch Health Council are just another layer of academic imbeciles. 

For example in the year 2005 it was discovered that the human brain can have diabetes, that was classified as diabetes type 3.

If you would ask the Dutch employees of the Health Council on that detail, they will react like seeing water burning of you have more of that 'it is just one person who found that' kind of stuff.

End of this update & and once more a rigid middle finger to de Gezondheidsraad!
Till updates. 

(07 Sept 2016) A few days back I finished the update on new methods for differential equations. That is our item for today: 

Item 1) Second teaser picture for the diff equations update. 

 Item 1) Second teaser picture for the diff equations update. 

So how 'new' are these 'new methods' anyway?
To be honest I have no idea, for example in Part 2 where we do the 'easy Taylor coefficient finding' it is hard to imagine nobody has done such a thing before. 

And in Part 1 where we expand solutions from the real line to the complex plane & more it is the same: It is hard to imagine nobody has never done that before. 

But in my life as a 53 year old person I have never seen it in not a single book or some internet resource. Yet one thing I can assure you: Everything beyond dimension 2 is very likely never done before. 

I shrunk the teaser picture from the other website from size 550 x 550 to 450 x 450 (otherwise it does not fit over here) and I hope you can read it a little bit. 

The new update is 10 pages long (that is 10 pictures of size 550 x 1100) and I did my best to concentrate on differential equations people know already and on approximation methods people know already. (Like the Taylor approximation.)

Click on the picture to land on the new update: 

For myself speaking the three coordinate functions as shown above can only be found if you treat the 3D vectors from 3D space as numbers. Otherwise you just cannot find a result like this. 

So that is one nail more in the coffin of the official math professors who think century in century out that three dimensional complex numbers do not exist... 

End of this update, if I have time this week we will also be looking at the very weird food advices as given by the Dutch so called 'gezondheidsraad' or as they name it themselves: Health Counsil of the Netherlands. 

These people are retarded to the bone and with only 10 minutes of internet search that can be validated on a deep level. Ok, see you around & till updates.  

 (29 Aug 2016) I am very pleased with the results from the university of California related to reversing Alzheimer because that is not very hard to do via diet changes.
So that is item number 1, in item number 2 a teaser picture for new methods of solving differential equations. 

Item 1) Dutch government health officials are really stupid. 
Item 2) New methods for solving differential equations, teaser picture.

 Item 1) Dutch government health officials are really stupid.

This year the Dutch health officials from the so called Gezondheidsraad crafted new guidelines around food, In the USA they have the 'food pyramid', here we have the 'disk of five'.   

In this item I will not go to long lengths as why I think that Dutch government officials are just as incompetent as math or physics professors. I just give a very simple calculation around blood sugar levels. Here we go: 

If you have developed that nice condition known as diabetes type 2 you constantly have too much sugar in your blood and that is not good. Now how do medical doctors measure your blood sugar levels?  

Very simple: If the reading is 140 that means you have 140 milligrams of blood sugar per deciliter of blood. That is a very difficult way of saying you have 1.4 grams of suger per liter blood. 

Healthy levels of blood sugar between meals is in the range of 90 to 100 meaning 0.9 to 1 gram per liter blood. 

So in your blood there is about 5 gram of blood sugar in your entire body if you have healthy blood sugar levels. 

Now suppose you eat two baguettes or about 200 gram of bread, let's say these two baguettes contain about 120 grams of wheat and I do not know the exact percentage but suppose this wheat breaks down into 80 grams of sugar. 

Do you understand the problem? 

Eighty grams of sugar eager to enter your blood stream is about 15 times the amount of sugar in your blood you need to function properly.   

Let me keep this item short: Most elderly are not bicycling the Tour the France on a daily basis, they do not need this high intake of sugar. It would be far more better if their livers produce the blood sugar they need.

And this, my dear reader is why I think the Dutch health officials are just another bunch of crap... 
______________ 

Update from 31Aug 2016: The latest update on food by the Gezondheidsraad are in the next link. It is a pdf file and it speaks for itself. 

https://www.gezondheidsraad.nl/sites/default/files/
201524_richtlijnen_goede_voeding_2015.pdf   

 Item 2) New methods for solving differential equations, teaser picture.

In the past I have stated often that if the complex plane is a fish bowl, the higher dimensional number systems are an ocean. 

Therefore the present 100 thousand professional math professors always prefer to be in that very fish bowl. This kind of flock behavior is very interesting, all in all it acts like a religion preventing progress and studying the ancient texts with devotion...  

Hello bunch of weirdo's: Here I have two functions x(t) and y(t) that are just simple real valued functions but if you differentiate them this mimics the multiplication from your superior complex plane.  

Without all this emotion about incompetent professionals: Lately I have been studying time evolution of complex spaces and to my amazement it was so simple to find very deep results so soon. 

You know inside math societies there is that idea going round: All the low hanging fruit was picked by Euler and associates. This is a nonsense idea: Only overpaid people eating bread at breakfast can take this seriously. 

Here is the teaser picture, just differentiate the two x and y functions my dear professional math professors and voila: There is your magnificent complex plane multiplication...  

End of this update, finalizing the above math work will take about one week while talking reason to our local health officials will take about 750 years. 
Till updates. 

(24 Aug 2016) Last year in 2015 I did a seven update long explanation of how to prevent Alzheimer based on the idea that those dementia illnesses are caused by the brain not having enough energy. 

Anyway the conclusion was: Stop eating that fucking bread because it contains gluten and the gluten is what weakens the blood-brain barrier. Also stop eating all that weird stuff like carbon-hydrates because if you eat the stuff that babies and children need that is not good for you... 

Now, 2016 by the way, at UCLA they had a small study with only 10 patients but they were capable of reversing the Alzheimer symptoms... That is our item of today: 

Item 1) Can Alzheimer be prevented by simple dietary choices? 

 Item 1) Can Alzheimer be prevented by simple dietary choices? 

In 2015 I perfectly understood how bad the general food advices are as given by the governments of all Western countries. That is not some evil conspiracy but much more accumulation of stupidity that gives rise to weird food advices like eating bread for breakfast. 

So in order to avoid hefty frustration I decided: Only seven updates and after that we will observe year in year out all those deaths from Alzheimer and the other brain deceases that kill efficiently. 

That is important because the imbeciles that give those government sponsored food advices simply have to carry a lot of their own grandma's and grandpa's to the grave before they will realize: My food advices are not 'completely optimized' yet. 

It is now only one year later and this is already the second time this year I speak about it again, but both on the gluten front and the consuming of simple carbon-hydrates it looks like the small UCLA study of only 10 patients is a thundering victory. 

I only cut and paste change number 1 that is the most important step in avoiding / reversing Alzheimer: 

Eliminating all simple carbohydrates, gluten and processed food from her diet, and eating more vegetables, fruits and non-farmed fish. 

Comment: It is important that year in year out all those nurses and medical doctors keep on carrying their own grandparents to the grave prematurely because only this kind of emotion will change the way they view food. 

Here is a modified picture of a screen shot, once more it is important that those weirdo's that keep on eating bread die too soon because they were stupid in the first place: 

Source link: newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/memory-loss-associated-with-alzheimers-
reversed-for-first-time 

Oops I also observe this strange advice of 'fasting for a minimum of 12 hours'. 

Now in order to get a clear discrepancy between the government guidance for food intake and my own view on that: Always allow for the elderly who already have Alzheimer to have lot's of candy in their rooms... 

Ok they will die prematurely from consuming all those sugary products, but we live in a free society without borders. 

Let's leave it with that; please die from Alzheimer to bring strength to my statistics!
Till updates & do not forget to eat your daily whole wheat bread at breakfast.  

(20 Aug 2016) Yesterday I posted reason nr 33 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles, a link will be there in item number 2. 

In item number 1 we will look at the MIT idiots once more. 

Item 1) More MIT idiot behavior observed?
Item 2) Reason number 33 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles.

 Item 1) More MIT idiot behavior observed?

Today I was just clicking around on this very website using the so called World Wide Web. To be precise: I was looking at my magnetic page. 

And guess what? 

Entry date = 12 July and two of the picture were missing...  

That was strange, this was so strange that I felt a heavy desire to investigate and indeed on the internet server two pictures were gone. 

Indeed this is strange behavior of website servers, so what kind of pictures are these??? Well these are two pictures where I more or less verbally attack one of those MIT weirdo's telling nuclear fusion is just around the corner.  

Here is the link to the refreshed page, I uploaded the first two images a second time so now the reading pleasure of the average reader is restored again:

12 July 2016: Reason 31: Experimental results from JET show non confinement for plasma particles.  

http://kinkytshirts.nl/rootdirectory/just_some_math/monopole_magnetic_
stuff.htm#12July2016 

Please MIT give me a break: I am not responsible for the utter stupidity of your own nuclear plasma professors...  

 Item 2) Reason number 33 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles.

Reason number 33 is a rather perfect reason because also in Europe we have lot's of weird physics professors trying to make nuclear fusion work. 

But the weird plasma professors always refuse to accept the elementary detail that electrons and other spin half particles are accelerated by magnetic fields. 

I found a perfect quote that talks about 'magnetic energy' that is supposedly loaded into the nuclear plasma and can destroy the fusion reactor if not understood properly... 

The professional plasma physics professors ( a pppp) do not understand it, but after retirement they can say what they want. And as such I was happy as a child to find the next drawing of a retired pppp:

Ok, end of this update. It was strange to observe the two pictures related to the incompetents of MIT removed from the web server. 
But there is no need to declare war on MIT or the wider parts of the USA because those people are on a long decade run of eating themselves to death.  

Of course I with them good luck with that ;) Till updates.  

(13 Aug 2016) Two days ago I posted reason number 32 as why electrons must be magnetic monopoles or at least must have a net monopole charge. In this update I named 3 things as why nuclear fusion will never work.

Item 1) For the first time I use the words 'magnetic discharge'.

 Item 1) For the first time I use the words 'magnetic discharge'.

When you look at those modern video's from the surface of the sun with all those coronal mass ejections it is hard to understand that this is only done by electrical fields and electrical discharges. 

Yet at present day with the Maxwell equations still ruling the brains of professional physics professors only electricity and/or mechanical motion can explain the behavior of solar plasma. 

After my humble opinion, all those discharges of plasma on the sun along magnetic field lines also have to do with what I call a 'magnetic discharge'. It looks a lot like an electrical discharge as for example we have here on earth in the case of lightning where a channel of ions (plasma) enables the electrical discharge.  

Solar magnetic discharges must be different in the sense you see something flying out and landing in some other spot of the sun. But if it is for example only magnetic monopole north particles going out, there must be a more or less equal amount of magnetic monopole south particles going into the sun.
Only you cannot see that but there is a strong clue as we see Newton's law of action versus reaction at work because never we observe shockwaves going out no matter how bit the coronal mass ejection is... 

Anyway a bit more down to earth; here is the picture of professional physics professor Steve Cowley who at some point in the video starts asking as why the plasma in the fusion reactor starts rotating... 

This Steve guy is from the UK JET fusion project and every time those people make we wonder: How can you work year in year out on stuff like that and never ever wonder as what makes the plasma following the magnetic field lines?????

Click on the picture to land on reason number 32:  

Link to the video the above screenshot comes from: 

Source: Inside ITER: Preparing to burn (Steve Cowley)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnTzFTjlwvw  

Let me not do negative or sarcastic but give you a simple example:

If an electron with initial velocity of zero goes from a negatively charge plate of -200 Volt to a positively charged plate of +200 Volt we say it has gained 400 eV (electron Volts) of energy. 

The electrons follow the electrical field lines because the electrical charges create a force on the electrons. 

With magnetism it is grosso mode the same only in practice it is very hard to mobilize enough magnetic monopoles because now the line splits in the particles themselves: there are two kinds of electrons, two kinds of protons, two kinds of neutrons etc etc. 

End of this update, till updates my dear reader.  

(03 Aug 2016) A teaser picture for a new post on the other website. 

Yeah yeah, higher order Cauchy Riemann equations and the math paradise they bring... If you would ask one of those severely overpaid non performing professional math professors about higher order Cauchy Riemann equations they would say: 

That is so simple to understand, nobody will study that because you are only going around in circles. 

Item 1) Teaser picture for an impending post on the other website.

 Item 1) Teaser picture for an impending post on the other website.

Oops oops, partial differential equations as the professional math professors have never seen them before... 

So as usual since the year 1990 when I for the very first time found the Cauchy-Riemann equations for the 3D complex numbers, there will be no response whatsoever. 

But life goes on and overpaying people always introduces giant inefficiencies, just look at the banking sector of our economy, and since life goes on I simply post some new teaser picture of some partial differential stuff. 

Let's keep it simple: Here are some higher order CR-equations & let's leave it with
that...  Click on the picture for the new post on the other website:

Yeah yeah, factorization of the Laplacian that rules the wave equation of quantum mechanics and those weirdo's stay 100% silent year in year out. 

End of this update, till updates. 

(30 July 2016) Wow man I am back from a very short holiday with a person named Son and although completely untrained he performed well:
On the second day he had to bicycle 88 km and he was almost like dead meat.
On day number five we did 104 km and after that he had plenty of energy left...

Also on day 5 we only ate non carb meals, very small like less than one third of normal energy intake for your body. It was a perfect lesson for Son: he now knows he can ride the bike for over one hundred kilometers without any of that weird carb food... 

Item 1) Can you as a nation eat yourself to death premature???

 Item 1) Can you as a nation eat yourself to death premature???

Of course you can, the most perfect example of wasting your citizens is the USA where more or less unavoidable life span will decline more and more in the next decades to come. 

It is strange that the nation with the highest per capita citizen GDP is also the nation leading in decline of your average citizen lifespan. 
The best way to understand societies learn nothing from the global obesity growth is every 3 months in Google news you search for the simple phrase 'obesity'. 

Just read some of that stuff and 3 months later you do the same and you arrive at the conclusion: This is a system that is not capable of learning. 

It is always the same dumb stuff like people need to exercise more. 
But if as a nation you feed your citizens industrial products instead of healthy food, what use is there in more exercise?  

The reason for this update is the next simple graph, I do not know how reliable it is but it is now the year 2016 and we are still more or less on steam with the impending decline of average USA citizen lifespan expectation. 

It more or less looks like those USA people are eating themselves to death, I wish them good luck with that because for the rest of the world that could be a reason to avoid too much industrial products that are marketed as food. 

Sources of the above picture: 

America’s inefficient health-care system: another look 
https://lanekenworthy.net/2011/07/10/americas-inefficient-health-care-system
-another-look/ 

Economy of the United States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_the_United_States 

End of this small update, if you are a USA citizen please keep on eating yourself to death because otherwise you would make me look like some kind of fool and I do not like that...  

Till updates. 

(20 July 2016) Last year 2015 I did a seven update long set of item's about Alzheimer, the root cause being an energy problem in the brain via insulin resistance and how easily to avoid this via dietary changes.
There was some unfinished business: All those weirdo's that claimed you need to eat carbs because your brain only runs on glucose...  

Item 1) Does evolution say: Thou shall eat carbs 3 times a day all year long? 

 Item 1) Does evolution say: Thou shall eat carbs 3 times a day all year long? 

In 2015 we observed there is a whole lot of experimental evidence that says Alzheimer is caused by insulin resistance in the brain. And when your brain has insulin resistance it cannot take in glucose while because insulin levels are far too high the body cannot burn fat at the same time. 

And if your body cannot burn the fat it gets deposited at strange places like your muscles and even in your body cells; that is the root cause of insulin resistance: intra cellular lipids blocking the insulin. 

Basically it is easy to understand: 

If you like me are 50+ years of age but you keep on eating like you are a 12 year old boy, likely you will run into a broad array of trouble. At the same time our own government is promoting to eat bread a few times a day but that stupid advice only ensures you cannot burn fat.  

And if you can't burn it, your body will deposit it in the strangest of places. 

__________ 

Anyway, last year I could never find a reliable source that explained in layman terms how your brain gets the energy it needs to function normally. 

The next video is from Eric Berg and a long time ago that person was the first to inform me that after eating a few slices of bread you cannot burn fat for many hours. I had some WTF reaction to that but studying the details proved Eric to be 100% right.

Anyway, click on the next pic to see the video and if you want to avoid Alzheimer ensure that you are able to burn that fucking body fat:

Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cwojmZxsjY 

In the meantime our own Dutch health authorities knows as 'de gezondheidsraad' promote eating bread because going against too much bread is 'just some trend' and is promoted by 'just some guru'... 

In my opinion these fake scientists should start at the basis and look up some stuff known as the glycemic index. It is obvious that in the past they were to fucked up stupid for this and it is expected in the future to be the same. 

So let me give the middle finger to de gezondheidsraad, in our society those fake scientists only make the problems worse and worse. Lets leave it with that, till updates. 

 (19 July 2016) All this bogus stuff using weird and complicated math that really does not help very much in understanding magnetism. Today's item is a short one and we compare how my 50 € experiment without any math at all relates to a similar result from that what likely is a ppp. (A ppp is a professional physics professor.)

Item 1) If you cannot use math, how to do physics experiments???

 Item 1) If you cannot use math, how to do physics experiments???

On 18 June I showed you the next photo where I show that with a stack of about 30 € of those new neodymium magnets on an old television you can separate the electrons from the three electron cannons into three regions:

Region 1: The outside.
Region 2: The dark spot where no electrons land at all.
Region 3: The center spot where the electrons that are attracted land.  

By all means, this is a very simple experiment... 

So let me show you the math needed so that a ppp can put up a similar graphic.
You can find this in the preprint archive, here is the title and link stuff: 

Spin Transport in Tilted Electron Vortex Beams 
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.03206.pdf 

Try to understand the math these professional idiots use...
It is incomprehensible, far to technical and has no relation with real nature whatsoever. But weirdly enough, after using a galaxy of not needed math this guy arrives at the next picture: 

The conduct of those people is breathtaking; holding on to the Maxwell equations but also capable of using some 'positive B' for spin filtering. 

What 'positive B' actually is is not explained of course; after all physics is the new 21-th century religion and as such we will observe much more 'miracles' like 'positive B' before those weirdo's understand electrons carry magnetic charge... 

Till updates. 

(13 July 2016) Just finished the 31-th reason as why electrons are not magnetic dipoles, it even contains are very simple calculation that everybody who understands 
F = ma will grasp... 

Item 1) Reason 31 as why electrons are not fully understood...

 Item 1) Reason 31 as why electrons are not fully understood...

Ok ok I know I have to be patient, but I am now talking 3 years about the fact that electrons do not behave the way they are supposed to do under the present umbrella of scientific physics knowledge. 

That is about 2% of the time since the Gauss law for magnetism was penned down by Gauss... 

It is remarkable that also in this case we have about zero response from the universities and academia; the bravery of those people speaks for itself (just like all those coward math professors). 

Of course I can put a positive spin on it: 

If they are incompetent to the bone, they know when to stay silent... 

Anyway, here is a small teaser picture and if you click it you will land on reason number 31 as why electrons are not magnetic dipoles as was conjectured by Gauss long long long before the actual discovery of electrons: 

Ok that was it, pop up a fresh beer or do whatever you like. 

See ya around! Till updates.  

(11 July 2016) It was a beautiful day yesterday because a Dutch guy did win an etappe in the Tour de France using brain over muscle while the Portuguese won the European soccer title... 

But our item of today is about plasma physics; if we want to save the earth for future generations we need fusion energy but the shitheads do everything wrong big time. 

Item 1) Why are professional physics professors in plasma so dogmatic?

 Item 1) Why are professional physics professors in plasma so dogmatic?

The answer is very simple: 

THEY BELIEVE THE GAUSS LAW FOR MAGNETISM IS ACTUALLY CORRECT. 

I deleted the text as I wrote it last night; I was far to angry and frustrated by how those plasma professors do not understand their own stuff. 

In order to kill the frustration I made a picture with four small screen shots from the video below where I show you what is wrong with the official approach. According to the laws of Maxwell in a magnetized plasma no acceleration occurs because of the magnetic field. On the other hand most people know that if you observe turbulence this is always related to acceleration of deacceleration of the stuff involved. Let it be air around an air plane or plasma in a tokamak; the turbulence itself is a strange attractor and always there are forces and energy involved... 

Here are just four things wrong with plasma physics: 

Fault 1: In the upper screen shot you see helical electron or proton movement; this is correct and caused by the Lorentz force but the way this is drawn you observe no acceleration of the particle. That is the 'dogma part' of plasma physics.

Fault 2: A giant difference between theory and experiment; they try to understand how particles disperse to the outside (that is the D with the perp sign to it) and if you use dogma stating magnetic monopoles to not exist you get that very small number.
Experimental evidence shows it is much much more like in the order of one square meter per second.

To the excuse of the plasma professors this is info from the UK based JET tokamak and they also use electricity to keep the plasma together and electricity also accelerates plasma particles...  

Fault 3: Plasma does not diffuse properly, anyway not like Brownian motion. But if you need stuff like Lévy-flight to model your plasma, something must ensure the acceleration of those particles. Well magnetic acceleration proportional to the inverse of the mass explains all observed stuff properly.

Fault 4: If all spin half particles are magnetic monopoles, in all tokamak and stellarator designs both electrons and nuclei will more around in two directions. So you will always get four streams of particles. And when those stream collide always a lot of particles will hit the walls of the vessel. 

__________ 

I simply predict that both the 20 billion € ITER in France nor the Stellarator from the Max-Planck institute will work properly ever. The design is flawed because in fact the particles are accelerated by the magnetic field and the longer it is confined by the magnetic fields the more turbulent it will get.

It is as easy as it is my dear reader. (And that made me so aggressive yesterday because the advocates of nuclear fusion always do that bla bla of global heating but those fools are on the wrong path...) 

Anyway, here is a link to the video that triggered it all:  

Neo classical transport in tokamak plasmas.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yujo7SN90YE 

Till updates. 

(09 July 2016) Yesterday I posted the latest post on 5D complex numbers and how I found the first modified Dirichlet kernel on the other website. Click this or the teaser picture from the previous update below. 

This update is about climate change as I can see it where I live. 

Item 1) The climate is shifting but nobody changes lifestyle yet...

 Item 1) The climate is shifting but nobody changes lifestyle yet...

Just a few anecdotes: 

Anecdote 1: Reinko is a draft soldier in the years 1985 & 1986 and by train I had to travel every week from the north to the south of this country. It was highly interesting to observe spring of 1985: 

In the south more or less perfectly the spring in all of it's details started about 14 days early compared to where I lived in the north of the country.  

The distance traveled was about 300 km in a straight line.

In the year 2016 it was in the local news that the growing season for al plant life around there was about 6 weeks longer. 

Beside spring we also have later autumns and the calculation is very simple: 

In about 30 years we now have the average climate around here like it was in the 1980-ties about 450 km to the south. For a human with their short lives this does not sound like a bit deal, yet in geological terms it goes with the speed of light. 

Anecdote 2) An 18 year old boy takes a walk through a local park and there suddenly is that giant plant that I just have never seen before. The locals name it bereklauw or bearclaw. And the thing is beautiful, almost three meters high unlike all other weeds around here it sure was a king the very first second I did see that new weed. 

At present day this weed has become a pest: It has become widespread and is a highly invasive plant so to say. Every year the costs of controlling this pest have gone up. 

Here is a photo I took today, I think this is ground owned by the local university and in the background there was just some demolition of the new pest but one small plant survived the pest control: 

In the background you see the poisonous destroyed bearclaw... 

Anecdote 3: Last month June 2016, for the first time in recorded history the yet streams high in the atmosphere have crossed the equator going from north to south. 

Normally the atmosphere around the equator is about 3 km higher and that more or less always keeps the jet streams from the northern and southern hemisphere separated. Well no longer I just guess. 

__________ 

Climate change is not something that will happen in some long distance future, it goes on year in year out but nobody changes lifestyle. 

Therefore the people from the SETI project searching for intelligent life elsewhere in the universe should turn around their telescope and turn it into a microscope and try to find intelligent life on our own very planet.

That is what I had to say today, have a nice life or try to get one.
Till updates.  

(04 July 2016) Today with a bit of delay like seven days, I finished the text for the nest post on the other website. It is about five dimensional complex numbers. Weirdly enough the 5D update from 30 Jan 2014 on this website always ends up very high in the search engine results. 

That is strange because that old 30 Jan 2014 update is really hardcore & as far as I know reality professional math professors do not like hardcore or softcore math when it comes from outside a university or so.

And that is our item of today: a teaser picture and a strange video of a guy defending the suburb academia & university people. 

Item 1) New teaser picture + do scientists use dogma?

 Item 1) New teaser picture + do scientists use dogma?

For the math folks, professional or not, British or not, try to think a little bit about the two integrals in the teaser picture below. Likely they can be solved using standard math techniques but I can solve it with two fingers in my nose while looking & thinking at other problems...  

As you see it has a nice flag in the background, the flag is irrelevant because what is relevant is how present day math could solve these two simple to understand integrals.
Later in the week when I uploaded the new post you can click on it for the new post:  

A Youtube channel under the name Concordance or as he writes it: C0nc0rdance has most of the time carefully thought through videos. Now to his defense I have to say this conordance guy mostly takes it out at the USA based creationalists and those USA folks believing in the literate creation of the earth like every point and comma in the Bible was scientific fact are one hundred percent retarded.

But thinking that the official science community is not prone to such thought is naive by all standards. I now have a solid bag of 30 reasons as why (for example) electrons carry magnetic charge just like they carry electrical charge but even if I could guess what happens if I would send that to a peer reviewed physics outlet like Nature??? 

Come on Mr. Concordance; the peer reviewer will use lot's of dogma because it is deep in the Maxwell equations that magnetic monopoles do not exist. 

Just a detail: For about 65 years physics people try to make fusion reactors because we fucking need an energy source outside gas, coal and oil. How much progress did they make? Indeed zero point zero point nothing... 

So do not say this so called 'exact science' does not use dogma. 

Here is the link: 

The Tyranny of Evidence: Do Scientists Use Dogma? 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqznURlEWI0 

Come on Mr. Concordance, both physics and math professors use dogma all of the time in all of the places. And year in year out a common characteristic is that when you confront them with it: They stay silent year in year out.  

Till updates my dear reader.   

(02 July 2016) By sheer accident today I bicycled towards a local village known as Haren and I came across that large spancloth reading: Open day 02 July at your drink water company. 

So driven by curiosity I went there and after taking some photo's of all that technical stuff I suddenly realized: THE BRITISH SHOULD KNOW THIS TOO!!!!! 

So that is our item of today: 

Item 1) Making Great-Brittany tea again. 

 Item 1) Making Great-Brittany tea again.  

It is no secret the British love their tea and that is not for nothing: without boiling the water and just drinking it without a boil you get all those illnesses and often people die.
By experience the clever British people know that if you drink tea you do not die from all those kind of weir illnesses... 

How does the average Brit make a tea?
For example this person lives near the river Thames, so if water is needed they go out with their kettle or a wooden bucket and a rope. They throw in the kettle or bucket and with the rope they pull it in. 

Ok, now the average Brit has his or her water they boil it and make their tea with it.

__________ 

Here in my own country we often use so called ground water, it is free from bacteria or germs so it only needs a few treatments and it can be pumped to the households and companies that need water for a array of reasons. 

We can drink tap water without getting ill...
In the next photo you see one of the oxidation chambers where water from the deep ground is oxidized so it does not have that 'ground taste': 

And when seeing one of those oxidation chambers I thought: 
Wow man, the Brits should know this too!

But a few minutes later I realized that Louis Pasteur was the person that discovered that people get a whole lot of illnesses via germs. Let it be in the air, in the food or in the water... 

So the British logic very likely goes like this: 

Louis Pasteur = a French person while;
France = European while;
Europe = Evil Super State where:
Super State abbreviates to SS and that has something to do with World War II. 

And I realized the British could never ever use the theory of germ born disease because that is all evil evil evil and it is better to make tea the British way once more... 

Till updates my dear reader. 

(30 June 2016) Today I did some serious thinking now I understand that the pro Brexit camp was fighting evil decade in decade out. They were fighting evil European institutions where unelected technocrats were writing evil laws that enslaved the freedom seeking wonderful British people.

And the coin fell: Start subsidizing corn just like in the USA! 

Item 1) Just like in the USA: start poisoning your own population!

  Item 1) Just like in the USA: start poisoning your own population!

Every USA citizen knows that the USA is the greatest nation on earth.
This is caused by the simple fact there are so many fat and obese people over there; for their population size they have the most kilo's of human biomass on the entire planet. 

(Actually this is not 100% true because there are some small island states where obesity rates are even higher... But anyway for normal countries it is true.) 

Now in the USA they also have a long history of fighting evil, that was known as the war on drugs. And highly fanatic government agencies on all levels, let it be federal or state wise, fought drugs with ridiculous punishments.  

For example if you were a teenager in the 1980-ties caught with a tiny amount of weed you got criminal records. And for a lot of them that was the start of a lifetime of unemployment.

But evil is evil so the authorities kept on going to fight evil. 

In the meantime decade in decade out the US government kept on subsidizing corn and although that is not evil an sich, they allowed the high fructose corn syrup in unlimited amounts in the food of the US population.  

So while fighting the evils of drugs, as far as I know it the USA was the only government that poisoned it's own population year in year out. 

As a result we have a present generation of youth that will have a shorter livespan compared to their parents. 

Also: Per capita citizen the USA has the largest GDP.

__________ 

Now we have Brexit Brittany should much more consider how she can be more and more in sync with the USA while fighting the evil European institutions. 

And after a bit of deep thinking the answer is very simple:

Start UK subsidies on corn, stimulate the consumption of high fructose corn syrup and ensure the rise of obesity by making Brittany bigger as ever before. 

Basically my advice is very simple: Just eat your way out and you'll be fine... 

A few technicalities as why it is so good to poison your own population while fighting evil at the same time is in the next vid: 

High Fructose Corn Syrup 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JhxXp_P3H0 

And if you are from the UK don't forget to eat more sugary stuff so all your savings go into your healthcare problems and your political masters will be happy because now they have more economical synchronization with the USA. 

Till updates.  

(29 June 2016) Correction: For me it is more or less very funny but I made a stupid typo in the updates below: it is not 0.1 cent but 0.1 Pound (or less than 0.1 Pound a day for the average UK taxpayer).

I also remember as why I made this dumb fault: I wanted to calculate it in pennies but I did not know how much pennies there are in one Pound. Well since the evil decimalization from 1968 (likely a European thing...) there are 100 pennies in one Pound.... 

__________

In another development it slowly more and more starts emerging that high fat diets simply are best. I can confirm that because all in all I lost over 25 kg (for dumb UK folks: that is over 55 lbs) and once you understand how food works it is so simple to loose weight:

Simply avoid all foods that jack up your insulin levels & live happily ever after.

Now in the UK people who have lost a similar amount of body fat like I did, only 1 in 210 succeed in not gaining weight but are capable of stabilizing their body mass...

The UK fuckheads, they all start eating carbs again showing they might be able to loose some weight for a short time but just do not understand what it takes long term...

Now when following a high fat diet consume zero carbs, those carbon hydrates are only polymers of sugar and humans are not like bees: for us daily consumption of sugar is poisonous. Anyway here is the link: 

High-Fat Diet Best for Diabetes Prevention in Obesity Prone 
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/865525 

No news on the Brexit today yet it is important to again tell the world the UK people are relatively stupid because over there only 1 in 210 can hang on to a loss of body fat of over 25 kilo's. I mean: THAT IS A CULTURE OF FUNDAMENTAL RETARDATION.

So we are better off avoiding intimate contacts. Till updates.  

(28 June 2016) Didn't I say yesterday that our local imbecile Geert Wilders would also like to have a referendum? That one would have the name Nexit.
Now I was unaware of it but today it was on the news that the political 'party' that is lead by the imbecile Geert Wilders filed a so called motion in our parliament asking for a referendum over here in the Netherlands.

Twelve parliament members from the political 'party' lead by the imbecile Geert Wilders voted in favor of it together with two others that formerly were a member of the political 'party' that is lead by the imbecile Geert Wilders. 
So that is a score of below 10% of Dutch parliament.

This drives our two items of today: Why is political 'party' not a political party and that lovely 350 million a week bus from the Brexit weirdo's: 

Item 1) Why a political 'party' and not a political party? 
Item 2) Why do so many British believe in such strange propaganda? 

 Item 1) Why a political 'party' and not a political party? 

In any more or less democratic country if you want to be political active you can join a political party. And if you join you become that what is known as a member, you pay your yearly contribution, you can go to meetings, you can vote for the stuff that is so important the party members want to vote about and so on and so on. 

So not the PVV (that is the political 'party' as lead by the local imbecile Geert Wilders). The PVV has only one member: Geert Wilders. 

Why Geert is so anti-democratic is something I don't know.
But I know that the great Adolf was far more democratic: 
If you wanted you could join the Nazi's... 

Let's leave this imbecile with that. 

 Item 2) Why do so many British believe in such strange propaganda? 

Churchill once said: The best case against democracy is just a talk to the average voter for just five minutes. (Or words of similar phrasing.) 

He was right: Most people live ordinary lives and are satisfied with that and never try to get out and explore some fresh and new idea's. They eat their daily bread that keeps them dumb and when being dumb they ponder about stuff that dumb fat people like to ponder upon. 

As an experiment of thought: 

Suppose you are one dumb daily bread eater overweight person and you see this bus riding around: 

Ok, I more or less estimated the average cost for being in the European market for the average 30 thousand Pound earning a year British tax payer about 0.1 cent a day. 

That is the net cost because most of that comes flowing back. 

So why are so many Brits not attacking this bus in the past from before the Brexit vote? 

Once more: WE ARE BETTER OFF WITHOUT THESE IDIOTS INSIDE!!!!! 

_________ 

So from Adolf being much more democratic compared to that piece of shit Geert Wilders to the Bus of Lies, I call it a day and I say: till updates. 

(27 June 2016) Yesterday I finally digged into what those Brexit people had to say and it was some weird stream of videos of UK people talking about 'the evil empire'.
It was kind of strange to observe this, for some collection of weird reasons they think the European institutions are 'evil'.

So let's stay calm and observe we are simply better of now those idiots have voted themselves out... 

Another strange thing is that when our local imbecile Geert Wilders shouts: 'We want a referendum too!!!' that instantly a lot of foreign media folks think that Europe is on the verge of collapse. And this all contributes to the panic on the financial markets so I love it I love it & once more: I love it. 

__________ 

But I also love it that I, Reinko Venema, was the guy that about 3.5 years ago figured out that electrons are in fact magnetic monopoles. And with that I am simply better compared to one century of professional physics professors... 

It is as simple as it is... So our item for today is what the ppp think of magnetic monopoles. The Youtube video is from the Royal Society, I saved it for a rainy day like today. 

Item 1) The heroic search for magnetic monopoles by the ppp.

 Item 1) The heroic search for magnetic monopoles by the ppp.

The professional physics professors are looking for a magnetic monopole that is at the end of an infinite long curly string and at the end for some strange reason a magnetic monopole has to drop out... 

Now in my world the word 'imbecile' not only refers to people like the Brexit voters or our local imbecile but also to physics professors who accept stuff like this 'infinitely long string' bla bla bla. 

It is so retarded that I am not going to comment on the video from the Royal Society; after all they made it themselves and after they made the video they did not destroy it but uploaded it to the Youtube channel so that every body can enjoy the fruits of their mind processes: 

Monopole quest (by the UK Royal Society)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSjRILOLWeA 

Just a screen shot: Paul was likely thinking if you extend this spiral thing long enough you would get a magnetic monopole:

Once more: this is so retarded and a disservice to the good things Paul Dirac did & I am not going to comment on this nonsense. 

Till updates. 

(25 June 2016) It would be tempting to comment about the Brexit but the main goal of this update is a bit more on the Maxwell equations. Therefore a small item on the Brexit and a normal item on the Maxwell equations related to the speed of light.

Item 1) Good news: The UK parasitic suckers are out!
Item 2) The Maxwell equations and the discovery of the speed of light. 

 Item 1) Good news: The parasitic suckers are out!

Decades ago it started with Margaret Thatcher: WE WANT OUR MONEY BACK!!! 

Now for some strange reason or a collection of strange reasons the Brexit camp in the UK always says that the UK is the biggest net contributor to the EU. 

I am amazed at how dumb this is; for the average tax payer in the UK about 1% of the paid taxes flow to the EU and a lot of that comes back. A guy under the alias of Thunderfoot made a good Youtube vid about that, he says: 

Suppose you earn 30 thousand Pound, you get taxed about 10 thousand Pound and from that about 100 Pound goes to the European institutions.
Most of what you pay comes flowing back and indeed if you are a net contributor as a country it might be expected not all 100 Pounds come flowing back so our hypothetical tax payer has a net loss of let's say 20 to 30 Pounds a year.

That would amount to at most 0.1 cent a day. 

For that they have access to a market of 500 million people, but for parasites as the British are these costs are apparently too high... 

Therefore as a Dutch guy I am glad we have gone rid of those parasitic shitholes...

 Item 2) The Maxwell equations and the discovery of the speed of light. 

Ok, it is not a secret I have a long list of about 30 reasons as why electrons must be magnetic monopoles and not the magnetic dipoles as the consensus is inside the field of science. 

If electrons are magnetic monopoles you need just a tiny change in the equations from Maxwell. But in the science of physics this Maxwell guy was some kind of prophet and on top of that he used an equation from Gauss that said that magnetic monopoles do not exist. 

Weirdly enough Gauss made his contribution many many years before the electrons were discovered. And as far as I know in the year 2016 there is zero point zero evidence that there is experimental proof for this weird claim. 

I mean everything in the Maxwell equations is shouting for symmetry, yet in the year 2016 professional physics professors are not capable of explaining the asymmetry as only waiving their arms while stating: life is so difficult to understand. 

Here is a nice screenshot: 

At present day you cannot paste code linking to Youtube video's any longer: You do not get a clean small link but the entire 'Youtube experience'.  

But the screen shot from above is from the next IP address: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PE5GEXqmT8 

Let's leave it with that and don't forget the GOOD NEWS: These idiots that do not understand the 0.1 cent calculus have a NEW FUTURE!!!!

Till updates.  

(18 June 2016) Two items: a teaser picture for a new post on the other website about modified Dirichlet kernels and an item about reason number 30 as why electrons are magnetic monopoles or if you want: carry a net magnetic charge. 

Item 1) Teaser picture for the modified Dirichlet kernels.
Item 2) More proof that electrons are magnetic monopoles.

 Item 1) Teaser picture for the modified Dirichlet kernels.

In a few days I will post a relatively easy to understand post on the other website (that is 3Dcomplexnumbers.net) and I did my best to keep it as simple as possible: 

Only dimension 1, 2 and 3 are covered although dimension 1 is rather boring because it amounts to a modified kernel that says d(t) = 1 all the time... 

But for n = 2 my modified kernels nicely gives the complex plane, as such suggesting this method of modified kernels are the answer to a few very deep mathematical questions I never dreamt of solving it...  

What the hydrogen bomb is in the average nuclear arsenal, that is what modified Dirichlet kernels are in the study of higher dimensional number systems. 

__________ 

All in all I am glad I finally did pen down this simple math because it contains a few elementary proofs that I always took more or less for granted. But now they are written down and on a very fundamental level I could expand my proofs using existing knowledge. So this is not about 'new trigonometric equations' but the other way around:

Prove this trigonometric identity using existing math. 

Here is the thing to prove:  

It is not a deep result but it is very fundamental to my theory of 3D complex and circular numbers. 

  Item 2) More proof that electrons are magnetic monopoles.

Lately one of my brother came by for a visit and since this is a relatively seldom event it was nice to show some of the changes in my household like garden stuff, new furniture made and also: 

Show my triple electron cannon gun particle accelerator and how it reacts on a s stack of those new neodymium magnets. 

And when I showed him you could create spots on the screen where no electrons land, he observed that 'this is caused because electrons follow the magnetic field lines'. 

For me this is a very valuable insight because if my brother thinks that it is highly probable a lot of professional physics professors think that too...

In the magnetics page I updated number 30 with two more photo's showing how electrons behave under the magnetic fields of the new neodymium magnets. 
And those two photo's counteract what my brother said:

Electrons follow the magnetic field lines and are also magnetic dipoles...

As usual click on the picture to land on the new update:

Ok, that is what I had to say. Till updates.  

(09 June 2016) Ok ok may be yesterday I came a bit hard down on those beautiful people that only have a hard time to understand math but otherwise they are the best of intellectual forces humanity has...  

So today I actually took the time to look at the Youtube video I posted myself yesterday and at one hour and 34 minutes I decided I had enough. 

Item 1) Hey you Harvard weirdo's, why not explain to me the electron pair???

 Item 1) Hey you Harvard weirdo's, why not explain to me the electron pair???

When thinking about humans discussing if or not the universe is just a computer simulation I only get a severe headache after listening to all that stupid stuff they say. 

No computer can simulate itself, so for the universe to be a simulated thing you need a computer that is many many times the size of our universe. So that is a little bit problematic in the first place. 

So let me keep this update rather simple and challenge all those beautiful minds they have at Harvard, Cambridge, Oxford, Russian universities and so on: 

PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME, IF THE ELECTRON IS A MAGNETIC DIPOLE, WHY ARE THERE ONLY ELECTRON PAIRS OBSERVED? 

Why does nature (simulated or not) does not allow for the electron triplet? 

Let's leave it with that, the overpaid university workers will do their thing once more and talk about themselves and how good they are... Till updates.  

(08 June 2016) In the last update where I questioned if Elon Musk was a simulated retard I found 3 more of these weirdo's talking about our universe being a computer simulation... 

Item 1) Is the science of physics a replacement for religion?

  Item 1) Is the science of physics a replacement for religion?

Religion is the oldest form of organized science because religion tried to explain stuff about the world we humans could not understand very good. 

So everything was created by some almighty God or Yahweh or Allah or some Hindu stuff... 

And many valuable thought exercises were made: how many angels can dance upon the point of a needle. 

Normally scientists like Neil deGrasse Tyson always reject the creationist thing because of the argument 'Who Created God???' 

And now these same people come up with the concept of that our universe is just a computer simulation of some superior alien race and that this kind of reasoning brings forward many 'mind blowing questions'.  

Don't believe me? Read this: 

WATCH: Is our Universe a simulation? The experts weigh in
http://www.sciencealert.com/is-our-universe-a-simulation-the-experts-weigh-in 

Who are these so called 'experts' that in my view cannot bake a mathematical cake anyway? There names are: 

1) Lisa Randall 
2) Neil deGrasse Tyson &
3) David Chalmers (the 'I found computer code inside math' weirdo). 

Facts are these 3 so called 'scientists' are too stupid in the first place to understand higher dimensional math like complex numbers in the first place.
In the second place people like these might be good in popularizing science but now they look as if they live to be on the television screen forever and ever...  

Back in the past it were also the more advanced scientists who pondered the question of how many angels could dance on the tip of a needle; in those old gone days it was the church that was the keeper of all knowledge known to man.

At present day the universities and academia's think they are the keepers of all knowledge scientific and we get shit like our universe is some computer simulation. 

I have said it so often: 

Present day science is organized like it is some substitute for religion... 

And if our universe would be a computer simulation, the computer that does this would be some kind of God don't you think?
And who did build that computer anyway? 
That is just like the question who created God... 

Let's stop this nonsense update on weird pseudo scientists like number 1), 2) and computer coding finding idiot 3).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=wgSZA3NPpBs 

Sometimes I just wonder: Why do people like this talk crap bordering on the side of pure religion and why do they not study math at all? 

Till updates my dear reader. 

(02 June 2016) For years I am annoyed by people who say that we are living in a computer simulation of some alien advanced species.

Just 'do the statistics' they say; the probability that we are living inside a simulation of reality are far greater compared to actually not living in a simulated world. 

Item 1) Is Elon Musk a simulated retard?

 Item 1) Is Elon Musk a simulated retard?

In the USA the Elon Musk guy is rather famous because he is in a very interesting array of companies. Rumors say he is more or less against AI (artificial intelligence) and in the next video you can observe all that stupid talk about 'living inside a simulated world': 

Elon Musk: Chance we are not living in a computer simulation is 'one in billions'
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/
news/elon-musk-ai-artificial-intelligence-computer-simulation-
gaming-virtual-reality-a7060941.html 

Now without doubt Elon is a smart guy and to be honest there is something to the idea we are living inside some virtual reality. 

But it is all nonsense after you try to do the next thought experiment: 

You must build a computer that has only one goal: 

Craft a simulation of yourself, so the computer has to build a program that if executed properly is a simulation of itself. 

__________ 

Just think about that for a few days; even our biggest human build super computers can only mimic a few million molecules of let's say the actual power supply of that very super computer. 

This is a very fundamental law in my opinion: 

No computer can make a simulation of itself that is actually better than the original. 

__________

So the idea that we live in a simulated world is kind of crazy to the bone:

Show me the computer that can do this in the first place and secondly:
Show me the aliens that for some strange reason want to make such simulations of our universe...  

Please keep it real: Despite what all those scientist say, it is fundamentally not possible to live inside a simulation because computers cannot simulate themselves. 

Hence, we are living in some kind of reality... (And not in some stupid simulation of that.) 

Till updates.   

 (27 May 2016) This update is mainly an advertisement for the new [a, r, t] coordinates as I published them on the other website a few days ago.

That is our item of today: 

Item 1) An advertisement for the new [a, r, t] coordinate system.

 Item 1) An advertisement for the new [a, r, t] coordinate system.

With a delay of about one week I finished this update, it is 14 pictures long with picture size 550 x 775 pixels. 

It is less technical compared to the latest update on page 4 of the higher dimensional complex numbers where on 6 May I introduced the [a, r, t] coordinates for the first time.  

In the [a, r, t] coordinate system all of those special properties of important particular higher dimensional complex numbers come together and each play the fine role as is needed. 

For any coordinate system to be useful, if must adept to the way the human brain works. For example we teach rectangular coordinates to high school pupils and when you enter university you also get polar coordinates in the plane. Cylindrical and spherical coordinates in 3D space and so on.

This [a, r, t] coordinate system is luckily very easy to understand: 
You take a cone and drag it through space along it's main axis of rotation...
You can 'touch' every point in 3D space with this simple idea. 

Ok ok there are some technical issues: In order to calculate the t coordinate you need all these fancy internet apps so this new coordinate system is in many ways also a true 21-century coordinate system: without those internet apps or advanced computer programs on your desktop it would not be of much use. 

__________ 

In the post on the new [a, r, t] coordinates I also give a new rule of de Moivre and I am joking that in about 3 centuries it is good there is finally some progress on that detail. 

Here is the teaser picture, click on it to land at the post on the new coordinate system. 

http://3dcomplexnumbers.net/2016/05/24/the-new-
3d-coordinate-system-a-r-t-coordinates/ 

Ok that was more or less what I had to say; it is funny to point attention once more to the new de Moivre identities while at the same time noticing non of all those fancy overpaid math professors will react on it... 

Let's leave it with that, till updates my dear reader.  

(20 May 2016) On the other website a weird thing is going on: I am getting hundreds of comments on my post on using 3D complex numbers for atomic and molecular orbitals. There is only one tiny problem: Non of them are written by humans...

So that is the item for today: 

Item 1) Can we kill AI before it kills us or shall we love AI?

 Item 1) Can we kill AI before it kills us or shall we love AI?

The last years all of a sudden AI is taking off because now you can train artificial neural networks like never before. This stuff is known as deep learning; it is possible to create some collection of artificial neural network and to train it. 

Anyway to make some long story very very short: 

A very important update on the other website was update number three on how to use 3D complex numbers when solving the Schrödiger equation. It basically says you should use only 3D complex numbers that are found on the main cone.  

It is relative deep math, so you are invited to check on those hundreds and hundreds of weird comments make by computer programs but there is not one real human amongst them at my other website: 

Third post on the Schrödinger wave equation using 3D complex numbers for atomic & molecula orbitals.
http://3dcomplexnumbers.net/2016/04/13/third-post-on-the-schrodinger-wave-
equation-using-3d-complex-numbers-for-atomic-molecular-orbitals/#comments

End of this update on the rise of the machines: Will they kill us?
Till updates my dear reader.  

(14 May 2016) Yesterday may be many years to late I went to the local child protection agency here in my city. They are located at the Leonard Springer Laan. At first I only wanted to make an appointment for next week or so, but there was a female prepared to make notes so I told my story.  

So I am changing my seven uploads on Hanneke slightly because the female from the local child agency explained a bit to me how children behave when they come under severe deprivation of people that show normal affection. 

This is the item for today: 

Item 1) Because the smallest child behaves like the child protection female says...

 Item 1) Because the smallest child behaves like the child protection female says...

Ok the latest news on the smallest child of the female psychopath Hanneke is very simple: Together with his sister he moved to a new school but he has behavior problems that forced the school to expel him and he has to go to one of those special education schools. 

But on those schools there is no room so he has to wait at least 30 days. And ha ha ha most of those 30 days will be spend with his dearest of psychopath mommy's depriving him even more from contact with people that act normally when it comes to showing a bit of affection.  

When telling my small selection of observations around Hanneke the female from the child protection agency said: 

Such children when they are offered affection often are very claiming about that. 

As I understood from the biological father of the child this is the case: The small boy wants attention from his teacher but he is in a class with like say 25 other children.
He does not get his attention fast enough so he does things like pulling the cables from the computers or some other stuff that brings attention in a fast way... 

You see, everything I have told you points only in one direction: 

Hanneke is a psychopath and as such she is not capable of understanding in a deep way how emotions in other people work. 

__________ 

Let me close this with story number 7 on Hanneke because for myself speaking I am deprived from talking about math and stuff:

Last year Hanneke her oldest son became homeless because for a few years he has lived with his biological father (he has a different father compared to the other kids) and that father moved to another town. 

So he became homeless sleeping on other addresses most of the days. I meet him in the street and he is explaining a bit how life goes and he cannot get enrolled in a new education because he is homeless. And those schools do not accept homeless people.  

I think about it for a day or two and decide 'You can live officially at my address but you can't be here seven days a week'. He agrees.  

In the same time I met Hanneke and we talked a bit about the homeless problems of her eldest son. And she is completely against the idea that he could use my address for example when he has to receive some mail or so. 

So this is the emotional system of the psychopath named Hanneke S: 

When her oldest son is homeless, she tries to make him homeless even longer. 

Ok, end of the 7 Hanneke files. Till updates.  

(12 May 2016) This is update number five on Hanneke. In this update I describe some stuff that happened in the year 2005 so that is when she only had one child. 

Item 1) After a few weeks suddenly Hanneke understands why...

 Item 1) After a few weeks suddenly Hanneke understands why...

Ok I learned the 10 year old boy to ride a bicycle and I slowly get more understanding of what is missing in his upbringing as a child. Now all my own children are a member of the local library; for kids up to 18 years it is totally free and that is one of the unpaid treasuries of our society. 

Needless to say I consider it very important that children have access to giant vaults of knowledge and also fun books to read. So I am consulting Hanneke if she knows it is free anyway and shall be make her son also a member of the local city library? 

I didn't know it was free she says so I take that as a token that we can go direction city library. 

So I take Hanneke her son there, show him how the book borrowing system works, we go through the membership administration stuff etc etc.  

The boy selects some books and we return home, likely at Hanneke her house I will drink some whisky and smoke a few joints because by now I understand that is her favorite way to kill the day time. 

I basically forget about the whole thing until a few weeks later Hanneke shows up at my doorstep in the evening. Her child is unsupervised at her home apparently. 

And Hanneke is really mad at me, that is clear so what is the problem I ask. 

Now I understand why you did all this library stuff! (She is really angry!)
That is to put my family in a bad spot light! (I have no clue what this is about.) 

Well it turns out the boy was late with returning the borrowed books, as most people know this is no a big deal like a fine of 10 cents a day.  

I try to explain that I never wanted a bad spot light on her family in any way but she keeps on being highly emotional and keeps on insisting that I did this library stuff only to put her family in a bad spot light. 

After two full hours of 'discussion' this detail it dawns on me the only way to stop this nonsense is to put up a fight in order to reset the brain of Hanneke. 

And I am shouting as hard as I can: Why do you have no teeth? You were a fucking heroin whore, you are a useless piece of shit. Your face is so ugly, who wants to fuck you now.  

After about 10 minutes of this stuff (in the meantime I am worrying what my neighbors will think of me tomorrow and the days after...) finally her brain breaks down and she starts to sob and cry.  

So after about 2.5 hours she stopped explaining that all this library stuff was done to put her family in a bad spotlight. All the time the kid was home so I send her back to her house and indeed she goes away. 

__________ 

Now my dear reader take some time to think about it: There are far less female psychopath compared to the rate of male psychopaths in the population. 

But on that day in the year 2005 I more or less began to understand that Hanneke was a female psychopath. 

___________

Yet on the wider range of things, every person is more or less a psychopath. For example if you step with you shoe on a few ants, do you instantly stat crying because you just killed a few of those very beautiful ants? 

No, normal people usual have little emotional attachment to a few bugs that might get killed yes or no. After all pest control is also important. 

Let me end with a nice old video of a neuroscientist who more or less discovers from his own brain scan he himself is in fact a psychopath also... 

But ha ha ha, there is a difference; Hanneke has a very low IQ while this guy is a higher IQ version of the psychopath thingeling.     

Discovering One's Hidden Psychopathy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOyAndLa5HU 

__________

End of this update, till updates my dear reader.  

(11 May 2016) This is update number four on Hanneke. In this update we do bedtime stories Hanneke style while in the next update I will give you a rather fundamental proof of her being a female psychopath. 

Item 1) Bedtime stories Hanneke style.

 Item 1) Bedtime stories Hanneke style.

Ok, in the afternoon we have been smoking joints and drinking whisky for hours in a bad ventilated room with a baby present. 
We have had our food and that is a thing where Hanneke is very good at: cooking. 

After the meal I turn to beer because I cannot stand those huge amounts of whisky.
Somewhere between 7 and 8 'o clock in the evening Hanneke suddenly decides it it bedtime for the baby. 

So she grabs the kid form the floor, goes to the room next to the living room en returns in a few seconds. As soon as she closes the door the baby starts to cry. 

Hanneke walks to the dinner table in the corner of the living room and she does not say a thing. I can see she is angry because of all that crying from the sleeping room.
This goes on for over half an hour, all the time she keeps looking angry. 

At some point in time I try to explain why telling bedtimes stories and talking a bit of what happened that day is good for children and that most of the time they will not cry... 

Hanneke does not say a thing, I am pretty sure all three of her children have never heard one story from her in their entire life. They might have seen it on the television, parents that actually talk to their children instead of only giving commands and barking negative comments... 

Now why does Hanneke do this? Once more; a psychopath has no clue about how emotions in normal people work. For Hanneke reading bedtime stories is a fucking waste of effort and time. For her doing that there is no reward like more whisky, more cannabis or money. Beside that there is not a single childrens book in the house. (May be now there is but at the time it was not.)

Very likely this goes on every evening: without any announcement suddenly picking up the child put her in bed and leave the room as fast as possible...

Welcome in the wonderful world of Hanneke...
Next time we will do the library story; when that happened I understood she must have psychopath issues. So till updates my dear reader. 

(10 May 2016) A bit more of Hanneke stories but I promise you that this is update number 3 on Hanneke and I will stop after update number 7 just like last year when I tried to explain you can only get Alzheimers if you eat bread every day multiple times.  

So we pick up on the day when the daughter of Hanneke was able to walk using the table as a guide. 

Item 1) Late in the afternoon her oldest son walks into the house, what will happen?

 Item 1) Late in the afternoon her oldest son walks into the house, what will happen?

It is about five o'clock in the afternoon and we have been drinking whisky and smoking joints for a few hours in a badly ventilated room with a baby around. 

And her oldest kid enters the house. 

This is not on deaf ears on Hanneke her behalf and she commands the kid over here and with great interest I observe a long stream of problems that this kid creates.  

It is not like "Hey son what have you been doing today but this morning you left a few bread crust on my aanrecht while you were preparing your meal for school while I was sleeping in my bed. Can you clean this up now?"

No, minute after minute a stream of low accusations comes out. 
It is clear the boy is used to this, he simply swallows all this low stuff and even tries to make a reasonable comment but this makes mommy only more furious.  

For me it is clear that the usual bonding between a child and it's care giver simply is not there. It is just some psychopath female trying to bring control to the scene... 

End of this update & we will have precisely four more updates on Hanneke to go. 

Till updates.  

(09 May 2016) Oh oh now I opened the box of Pandora about a female named Hanneke S why not post a second update with some baby stuff from about 8 or 9 years ago?

If after reading this you think I was an asshole not going to the police or the child protection agencies it is very simple:

1) In those long lost years the local police always tapped the sounds in my home via my telephone. The technical details how they did this are not important but each and every day when I did my daily walk to the local supermarket it was always at the same space there was this police car with always 3 police officers in it.
It was always at a shop named Dik Race, they had fine-tuned me leaving my house against their readiness of preventing ruthless terror attacks... 

2) Child protection agencies? Give me a brake, I was under investigation myself.
And if you are under investigation yourself, there is little practical use of making them change their minds. 

Item 1) Hurray, Hanneke has a new baby and she is so cute!

 Item 1) Hurray, Hanneke has a new baby and she is so cute!

It's about 8 or 9 years back and I am over at Hanneke her house that is right behind the corner and her baby named S is just so cute! By now she can stand holding herself at the table and move a bit around by that.

Hanneke asks me: shall we smoke a joint? 

That was ok by me although even in those long lost years I never liked smoking weed during the day time. So Hanneke prepairs a joint and I say: 

Shall we go to the garden because all this smoke is not good for babies. 

Hanneke, skilled female psychopath as she is, she opens a tiny window so that fresh air can come in.

The baby S is trying to get to mommy and is going to use the table as a guide.

All of a sudden Hanneke places a carton box between her and the baby.

The baby clearly does not like it, but at looking at the scene she decides that if she moves all the other way around she would still make it to mommy...

So the baby goes all the way step by step and tries to make it to the other side. 

And guess three times what happens? 

Mommy replaces the carton box so the path of the baby is blocked & the whole scene repeats itself. And again mommy replaces the carton box so that fucking stupid baby would stay away from touching her.  

__________ 

And as such what once was a perfect baby is at present day a child having all kinds of damage that was not needed in the first place. 

End of this update, have a nice life or try to get one. 

(07 May 2016) Two items, one about a street kid I know for about 11 years and the second item is about a brand new coordinate system that is very beautiful if you understand it. 

Item 1) What about the boy now he is so psychotic?
Item 2) Teaser picture for the latest math update.

 Item 1) What about the boy now he is so psychotic?

It was in the year 2005 and there was that boy walking down the street with a bike in his hands. And always he was only walking, he never did ride his bicycle. 

So I asked him why he never rode his bike and he said: I would like to ride my bicycle but I do not know how to do this. 

A few days later I learned him how to ride a bicycle, it took a lot of running but within one hour he could ride his bike... 

Later I confronted his mother, her name is Hanneke and I asked her as why her 10 year old son was not able to ride a bicycle. All I got for an answer was some lousy explanation as that she herself never learned that and when she fell with her bike and came back in bruises she only got laughed at by her parents.

More later I confronted his mother: But you got pregnant so you had to stop smoking weed and stuff.
Answer from mommy dear: But I was so glad to give him that feeling of a high while he was still in my womb... 

__________ 

Fast forward to today: Yesterday I visited the boy who is now in emergency care at the local shrink clinic know as Lentis in Groningen. He is totally psychotic like cutting his clothes, wearing sun glasses with only one dark glass & total chaos.

Now the psychopath scientist in me is glad to observe what 21 years of emotional neglect can do do a child. But my human part suffer a lot because the female under the name of Hanneke has two more children under her care. 
They will more or less go down the same route, that makes me sad. 

 Item 2) Teaser picture for the latest math update.

With great joy I announce a new coordinate system, it can only be used inside a 3D number system like circular or complex numbers. So during my life it will never take off because of the 'special smartness of the professional math professors'. But decades ago I understood how smart these people are, so why talk about shit when you can also discuss math beauty like a new coordinate system??? 

Come on, they are mostly imbeciles with that retarded stuff like 1 + 2 + 3 + ... = -1/12. 

And do those retards ever come up with a simple but fundamental new way of crafting new coordinate systems? Nope, njet, no, nee, nein und nimmer... 

They only recycle the known coordinate systems like the rectangular, spherical or cylindrical coordinate systems... 

Well talked enough about those people, here is the teaser picture and in this picture you can see that I myself can also be very stupid for decades on a row:
In the past I really tried to find metrics so that the length would be preserved, but the determinants always killed everything I threw at it. 

Yet in the upper part of the teaser picture is something I should have calculated a long long time ago. As usual click on the pic to land at the update. 

Till updates.  

(01 May 2016) A few days back I posted an extra update in my 'debunking Euler' update on page four of the higher dimensional complex numbers. That is the item for today: 

Item 1) More debunking Euler stuff...

 Item 1) More debunking Euler stuff...

Originally posted on 15 April, two days back I posted two more pictures there where I basically do two things: 

Thing 1) Calculation zeta at minus one using the analytical expansion and 
Thing 2) Make the same flawed mistakes as those five Nottingham professors do but now with the geometric series. 

Since everybody knows the geometric series I found wisdom in debunking the
next also: 

 1 + 2 + 4 + 6 + 16 + 32 + etc etc = -1.

But university people are university people and indeed it was simple to find a university weirdo easily explaining as why this should be minus one: 

Adding Past Infinity (WARNING: Math Ahead)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIq5CZlg8Rg 

The above video is from MinutePhysics, it is only 47 seconds long and the calculation speaks for itself. Needless to say it is nonsense on a very deep level. 

But university people are university people and a pure intellectual under that name of Singing Banana was Nottingham professor number five that give the green light for nice summations like:

 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + etc etc = -1/12. 

Ramanujan Summation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hgeIDY7We4

All of this nonsense feeds upon itself: The math people think that because the physics people from string theory stuff use it, there must be some truth in it.
The physics professors think that because Euler and Ramanujan are never debunked properly it must have some value. 

And life, life will go on...
End of this update. 

(28 April 2016) Two more updates in the magnetic page, so that is our item:

Item 1) Reason number 27 and 28 are added in the magnetic page.

 Item 1) Reason number 27 and 28 are added in the magnetic page.

It is well know that a moving electrical charge like an electron produces a magnetic field and a moving magnetic charge produces an electrical field. 

So my teaser picture looks very weird: according to professional physics professors the electron is a magnetic dipole. We have used the scientific method they say.

That is very interesting, but in this teaser picture as far as I can see I do not see a magnetic dipole at work. If there is any truth to those pictures depicting how linear polarized light acts, it cannot be a magnetic dipole combined with an electrical monopole. 

I have spoken, here is the teaser picture: 

Have fun with thinking about the existence of linear polarized light.

_________

It is well known that professional physics professors are very good at stating the next: 

If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand it.

And they are in the right: If you think that an electron is a magnetic dipole it is extremely hard to understand quantum physics. 

Here is a nice Youtube video from a female that really tries to understand the stuff with electron spin but she just keeps on hanging to that dipole magnetic thing.
Once more we observe that 'modern science' is only a substitute for religion, but let me skip my usual stick horses: 

The video is from a female under the name 'looking glass universe' and she really tries to make sense of the concept of electron spin. 
She is cute but also a perfect example as why physics is the 'new religion' because dogma's are never doubted but used as basic thought ideas:

Spin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gh7xITmvgyU 

End of this update, have a nice life or try to get one. 

(20 April 2016) Just an item related to an email:

Item 1) I emailed daughter but she said she did not understand it...

  Item 1) I emailed daughter but she said she did not understand it...

Oh oh, I emailed Daughter with a short version of the debunking Euler proof and she said she did not understand. And since she is not particular crazy I decided to look for that video that is fool proof so that you can understand as why some professional math professors think that: 

 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + etc etc = -1/12.

This is all very basic math, no zeta function stuff or so... 
Only the fact you can add or subtract two rows of numbers and that you can multiply them by a constant number. Click on the picture for the Youtube video:

Video link:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-I6XTVZXww

And if you search for the 'sum of all numbers' on Youtube you get the next stuff: 

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=sum+of+all+numbers

Well I really hope I did not confuse to many people because that proof saying it is nonsense to valuate the natural numbers to -1/12 is just basic math. 

Till updates.  

(16 April 2016) Two new updates and that is the item of this update:  

Item 1) Debunking Euler & third post on the Schrödinger equation.

 Item 1) Debunking Euler & third post on the Schrödinger equation.

Debunking Euler: 

Five days ago I was at a public lecture at the local university here in Groningen and a guy named Frits Rammers (for Dutch folks that would be Frits Beukers) talked also a bit on a very bizarre result dating back to Euler himself: 

1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + etc etc = -1/12. 

Obviously this must be nonsense, only people why are bad at math will fall into this trap done by the high priest of math himself: Leonhard Euler.

Now does this change my views on Euler since this high priest is so easy to debunk?
Of course not, Euler gave the world the number e and if he would not have done that it would only be in this century that I could do the same... ;)

So as far as I am concerned, Euler will always be the number 1 guy when it comes to ranking math people in the long run. The debunking stuff is found in page 4 of the higher dimensional complex numbers, to be precise it is at entry 15 April 2016.

__________ 

The third post on the Schrödinger wave equation is on the other website: 

http://3dcomplexnumbers.net/2016/04/13/third-post-on-the-
schrodinger-wave-equation-using-3d-complex-numbers-
for-atomic-molecular-orbitals/ 

Both updates were fun to do: The Euler debunking stuff was fun because it was so easy while at the same time for example 26-dimensional bosonic string theory is based on that.  

And the Schrödinger update was fun because I succeeded into explaining how to use 3D complex numbers without ever solving the Schrödinger wave equation.
So from my point of view it was a great week:  

Debunking weirdo's like people who believe in string theory & at the same time giving the green light for usage of 3D complex numbers for constructing those very difficult atomic & molecular orbitals.

It truly was a geek week! Till updates. 

(10 April 2016) The last few days I have been writing stuff for the third post on the Schrödinger wave equation from quantum mechanics using higher dimensional complex numbers. 

This update is for posting the teaser picture. 

Item 1) Teaser picture for third post on the Schrödinger wave equation.

 Item 1) Teaser picture for third post on the Schrödinger wave equation.

More or less without thinking in the first post on the Schrödinger equation on the other website I said you should use complex numbers from the main cone in order to craft all those beautiful atomic & molecular electron orbitals... 

Later that week I was cleaning my living room and came across that old dirty piece of paper, and yes it was true: A long time ago I already decided you cannot solve the Schrödinger wave equation using 3D complex numbers. 

It was clear I had acted like a fool because you cannot say 'use the main cone' if in a wider sense it will never work. 

But now some time later I am almost ready with composing the third post.
The math itself was developed over two years back by me and for myself speaking it was very rewarding to do it once more.  

For example in the next teaser picture you see the plusses and minusses of the three basis vectors. My complicalted exponential curve goes through all these six end points.
That was a major math victory at the time leaving all those so called 'professional math professors' far behind in a cloud of murky dust... 

For myself speaking it was nice to read all that old stuff again; because there is more than 2 years between it I could also see how my own brain works... 

__________ 

In a few days it all will be ready and posted on the new website:
3Dcomplexnumbers.net  

Till updates.  

(06 April 2016) Yesterday I came across that video with the nice title 'Magnets in the sky' and may be I could find a bit more reasoning as why electrons are the long sought magnetic monopoles. 

But what I found was the most utterly and totally stupid explanation of how permanent magnets work.  

Item 1) For whatever reason, iron does line up it's electrons at 11.34 min.

 Item 1) For whatever reason, iron does line up it's electrons at 11.34 min.

This guy physics professor Bryan Gaensler tells more or less the most retarted explanation that is out there. He is not the only one, I have seen MIT profs doing this too but the way Bryan puts it is just so mindbreaking stupid. 

If you think about it, Bryan thinks the electrons are glued into a fixed position and that is the way permanent magnets work. 

He compares wood to iron, observes in wood electrons have spins in all directions while in iron 'for whatever reason' (sic!!!!!) the electrons are aligned. 

I have to say I am more or less speechless as why this retard gets a government paid salary. As stupid as he pumps it up, he is classified as a 'creationist'. You know one of those people that think the earth is created in six day and the bible is in fact a scientific piece of work. 

It is just so utterly fucking stupid, I stop talking about this retard. 

Source of the screenshot picture: 
Magnets in the Sky, Prof Bryan Gaensler (aka the fundamental retard)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkW06LNhpaQ  

This explanation is 100% retarded as only the people of the universities can come up with. 

Luckily as an antidote to this sheer 100% retardization process I posted reason number 25 and 26 into the magnetic page. 

Let's leave it with that. Till updates.  

(01 April 2016) The 3D complex numbers seem to be faring well in the diverse search engines but the fact that electrons are not magnetic dipoles is much more of an abandoned orphan.

So in this update I only repost a picture of me holding a bunch of those powerful new neodymium magnets against a 6 € old television. 

Item 1) The Lorentz force only goes that far...

 Item 1) The Lorentz force only goes that far...

It is just a repost of a picture from some time ago and at the same time I perfectly understand how deep the science of physics is married with the idea you cannot make magnetic monopoles. 

But each and every electron in our universe is a magnetic monopole, if you want this statement a bit less extreme you can say electrons carry a net magnetic charge. 

By now, if you are a professional physics professor you are already on the verge of vomiting, I am well aware of how you behave and why you behave.  

Let me not do difficult and just repost my old photo of holding this stack of strong magnets against a small television screen and trying to explain what I see using the ideas behind the Lorentz force:  

If you click on the picture you get a bigger version of it but in this small one you already see the Lorentz force at work: it is that rotating thing going round using the rigth hand rule. 

Unexplained is the circular spot where no electrons land on the television screen.  

Present day physics in the year 2016 cannot explain this empty electron spot. 

End of this update, till updates. 

(24 March 2016) Six days back I made a small advertisement for the woodshop Dikhout that sells countless fine woods from all over the world. But this does not mean all wood from regular shops like Hornbach is worthless.

Item 1) In defense of Hornbach wood.

 Item 1) In defense of Hornbach wood.

In the picture below you see a piece of a wooden beam, bought it about a year ago and it was only 8 € for about 3 meter of beam. That is dirt cheap, beside being cheap it is already flattened and shaved. 
The only disadvantage is that it is kinda pale, in the past it was easy with a finish containing petrol and stuff to get a far stronger contrast in the grain of the wood. But at present day most paint is water based and that does not improve the grain of the wood. 

On top you see an unfinished piece of wood and directly below I brought a bit of contrast in it. How to make this kind of wood a bit more beautiful? 

Very simple: You make you own water based paint with two pieces of steel wool (wash out the soap carefully) and some vinegar. I used cleaning vinegar because it is a bit stronger. You put it in a jar and put the lid loosely on it.
After about a day or five it is ready to use, filter it through a paper coffee filter or something like that. 
It is important you take enough experiments because this stuff acts different on different kinds of wood. After five days the paint is very strong, I had to dilute it to 25% of it's original strength. 
After painting you can sandpaper it unit you get what you wanted.

The piece of wood below is some plywood, you see a small gray spot, so you see it works very different going from one kind of wood to another. I do not like the gray color, but that is for every one themselves to decide.

Again dilute it enough, the first time I tried this the wood turned into pure black and that was a pity because without the paint it looked better and I could not sandpaper it.

So experiment on small pieces of wood that you do not need anyway... 

Till updates.  

(21 March 2016) Yesterday I finished reason number 24 as why spin half particles are in fact magnetic monopoles, or if you think such particles are always spinning very fast without any reason: they have a net magnetic value.
That is the item for today: 

Item 1) Reason 24: Energy distribution in cosmic rays.

 Item 1) Reason 24: Energy distribution in cosmic rays.

Where the spinning electron pair explaining dia-magnetism is the smallest thing based on the idea of electrons being magnetic monopoles, the behavior of charged particles in inter-galactic and galactic magnetic fields is, until now, the greatest structure found that drives the behavior of cosmic rays. 

In the next picture you se an impression of our Milky Way and a few years back the high energy satellite Fermi found two giant lobes perpendicular on the center of the Milky Way and there was significant more gamma rays coming from that part of space.

Gamma rays are the highest energy rays we know of, it is thought they are produced by cosmic rays and contrary to the name cosmic rays are not rays at all but very energetic charged particles.   

Cosmic rays (particles) is also a bucket name for a wide variety of particles, the lower energy ones come from our sun in those violent corona mass ejections and for those high energy stuff the professional physics professors have no good explanation.

That is understandable: If you think that electrons are magnetic dipoles it will never cross your mind they are accelerated by magnetic fields. In that case you will only think they are accelerated by electrical fields. 

Well that is a choice they made every day again in favor of the prophet Maxwell (may peace be upon the prophet Maxwell). Long before the electrons were discovered the prophet decided magnetic monopoles do not exist and until this day this is part of the Holy Scriptures of the religion named physics...

Let's leave it with that, here is the teaser picture for reason number 24: 

Of course the pink/purple stuff is only showing the space where the gamma rays are coming from. As usual click on the picture to land on the magnetic page.

Joke of the day: If you know a professional physics professor in person, just ask this person how to explain such giant lobes of 25.000 light years high... 

Till updates.   

(18 March 2016) About one week back I took a look at the amount of pictures I made since I started that new website 3Dcomplexnumbers.net. Indeed fresh picture production was so high I thought 'let's take a little holiday from that'.  

Item 1) Let's take a holiday from all that math and stuff. 

 Item 1) Let's take a holiday from all that math and stuff.

Beside hobby's like brewing beer, riding the bicycle & tiny amounts of published math, every year I also make a few pieces of wood furniture. Here you see a picture of my latest piece of furniture; a new book shelf that replaces the old one. 

On the left of the picture you see two new woodworking projects: 

The thing on top of the barrel is supposed to be my very first table saw sled. With a sled like this you do not need to have your hands very close to the sawing blade, so this brings in a bit of safety.

Underneath the sled is a barrel, that was a woodworking project from about 8 years ago and now I am going to turn it into the Cauchy integral formula with the help of lots of epoxy resin and some prints of the new Cauchy integral formula.    

I would like to make a free advertisement for the guy where I mostly buy my wood. 
The locals here in the city of Groningen likely know the new bridge known as the Oslo bridge. If you come from the kernel of the city, after the bridge you go to the left and park your car at Dikhout fijnhout. 

The guy from Dikhout has wood that is very very hard to find at places like Hornbach, Praxis or whatever 'wood retailers' that are out there to serve the public need for fresh wood. 

End of this update, if I succeed with the Cauchy barrel may be some more photo's will be added. Till updates.  

(09 March 2016) Added to the page on magnetism are two more reasons as why electrons & other spin half particles are magnetic monopoles.
Since the very last reason involves also diamagnetism of DIY at home made plasma, I finally had a good reason the post that picture of the levitating frog...  

Item 1) The levitating frog.

 Item 1) The levitating frog.

Reason 22 is the so called Birkeland currents, I never heard of them but these currents stream from the sun outwards to the earth and stuff. I found a perfect very old photo, likely made by Birkeland himself, it shows a toy model of our earth bombarded by electrical currents.

At the end of reason 22 I post a link to a video that shows some guy making DIY plasma at home and he is doing experiments with strong permanent magnets. In reason 23 I discuss the results of that person in detail because the plasma particles that are diamagnetic behave perfectly as one should expect when electrons are magnetic monopoles.

But if you would ask a professional physics professor about how to explain diamagnetism, you get answers like:  

1) Diamagnetic materials contain no unpaired electrons, or; 
2) If atoms have only electron pairs, they become diamagnetic, or;
3) It atoms are stripped from the unpaired electrons, those ions are diamagnetic. 

Etc etc. 

Stuff like that is not an explanation, at best it is a correct observation or description about when you can expect diamagnetism. But it is not an explanation. 

__________

Click on the picture to land at reason 22 as why electrons are magnetic monopoles: 

This frog was levitated at some Dutch university, you know one of those places where they are overpaid and think they understand electrons using advanced math... 

Let's leave it with that. Till updates.  

(03 March 2016) Weirdly enough my six dimensional complex numbers are a hot topic when it comes to Google picture searches. That is our item for today: 

Item 1) Why do the 6D complex numbers score so high?

 Item 1) Why do the 6D complex numbers score so high?

The six dimensional numbers combine the 2D complex plane and my own invention of 3D numbers in a very straightforward way, so why are they so successful?  

Likely it is the 'complex plane' because people from universities and stuff know what the complex plane is. 

Of course it is a great honor to arrive at search result number 3, but for me who has published vast amounts of math that has gone unnoticed, I don't give a shit.

__________ 

After having said that, look at the screen shot & after that I will give you the link to what started it all.  

End of this update, click on the pic to land on the post outlining the 6D complex numbers using only 2D & 3D complex numbers. 

Till updates.  

 (25 Feb 2016) Added is reason number 21 as why spin half particles are magnetic monopoles, that is our item for today:

Item 1) The way magnetic mirrors work in plasma containment. 

 Item 1) The way magnetic mirrors work in plasma containment. 

Just go the magnetics page here and enjoy reading reason number 21 for spin half particles being the long long sought magnetic monopoles.

Till updates.    

(22 Feb 2016) Just finished a new math update under the title The Cone Theorem.
That is the item for this update: 

Item 1) The Cone Theorem.

 Item 1) The Cone Theorem.

I found a very beautiful way to classify all subspaces of the 3-dimensional complex number space such that if you multiply by an imaginary unit like j, all stuff gets rotated by a fixed amount.  

This also adds a new layer of geometric properties on the 3D complex and circular number systems. It has to be remarked that I found it because the preprint archive article from Slomi Jacobi gave me the idea to investigate this stuff a little bit. 

Here is a link to the preprint archive: 
On a novel 3D hypercomplex number system
http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.01459 

The new update is 12 pages long and placed in page four of the higher dimensional complex numbers. If you click on the teaser picture you land directly on the new update: 

The applet I used for these pictures is the Polyray applet from the WIMS archive of applets. The next one is from the university of Leiden but there are more around the world. Likely you must search a little bit:  

Polyray  http://wims.math.leidenuniv.nl/wims/wims.cgi

Ok, that was it for today. Till updates.  

(17 Feb 2016) Another reason why electrons and protons are magnetic monopoles. This time it is from the geniussus of MIT, believe it or not but via simulations on giant super computers they found that there are two types of plasma instability.   

Item 1) One step closer to fusion power.

 Item 1) One step closer to fusion power.

The title of this item is the same as the video from MIT, for reasons of being very sarcastic I hold on to this title. This is now year three of me talking about electrons and stuff being the long sought magnetic monopoles and year in year out on a global scale all university people stay silent. 

That proves a lot of things, things like being stupid, being arrogant, not understanding your own profession, being a bunch of fucking cowards and so on and so on. 
The list of problems these people have is like an endless river. 

And always this bragging like 'we follow the scientific method', if for just once they did that instead of that endless river of nonsense about electrons that are spin half and magnetic dipoles at the same time. 

There is no proof for that, the scientific method is not used for about 106 years since electrons were first discovered... These people live in a fantasy world, a lot of the common knowledge is correct but a few important details stay wrong year in year out...

Click on the picture to land on reason number 20: 

Source: One step closer to nuclear fusion 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLI6QW2x4Lg

Till updates.  Extra update from 19 Feb: 

It is also funny to read the news from the MIT source itself, for myself speaking I consider it also more or less funny when on 21 Dec I explained the root source of plasma instability via spin half particles being magnetic monopoles in at most two hours. It took the MIT weirdo's 37 days on a giant super computer to find similar results. The only problem is: the MIT weirdo's still think electrons are magnetic dipoles... 

Well, good luck with it. 

Here is the MIT news link:  New finding may explain heat loss in fusion reactors
http://news.mit.edu/2016/heat-loss-fusion-reactors-0121 

Till update my dear reader.  

(15 Feb 2016) Only added Reason number 19 as why spin half particles are in fact magnetic monopoles. This reason is the temperature of the corona of our beloved sun. And since this temperature is about 100 times as high as the outer layers of the sun, only a fool would hang on to stupid stuff like electrons are magnetic dipoles...

Click on the above picture to land on the 19-th reason as why spin half particles are all magnetic monopoles.  

Till updates.  

(12 Feb 2016) I was busy doing other things so only this evening I became aware of the announcement that gravity waves are discovered. Give or take it looks like a solid breakthrough, so why am I not dancing on the table? 

Very simple: I dance on the wooden floor because years back I had to repair the table and I know how weak it actually is. I am not going to dance on a weak structure like that. 

Item 1) China has also a record breaking new when it comes to nuclear fusion. 

 Item 1) China has also a record breaking new when it comes to nuclear fusion. 

On the fourth February of this month I poked fun at those German scientists from the Max Planck Institute about how their Stellarator nuclear fusion reactor will never ever work because they are in denial when it comes to the properties of the particles that make up the plasma. 

The Stellarator folks managed to get the plasma to about 80 million degrees Celcius for about 250 milliseconds. 

I informed them this project will blow up in their arrogant faces... 

__________ 

Did I know that the Chinese were also hunting down nuclear fusion the wrong way?
No, until this day I was not aware of any Chinese stuff using the retarded Tokamak design to craft nuclear fusion. 

It makes me smile because after all the Chinese have a new endurance record:

102 seconds of stable plasma. 

Funny link from a website under the name 'popular science':
CHINA'S EXPERIMENTAL FUSION REACTOR HITS MAJOR MILESTONE
HOTTER THAN THE INTERIOR OF THE SUN
http://www.popsci.com/chinas-experimental-fusion-reactor-hits-major-milestone 

__________  

All those circular nuclear fusion reactor are self destructive by design because the scientists on a global scale refuse to understand how spin half particles behave inside magnetic fields. Let's leave it with that, till updates.  

(10 Feb 2016) I opened page 4 in the higher dimensional complex numbers on this website. But now I have that new website known as http://3dcomplexnumbers.net/ my estimation is that I will publish only the more hardcore stuff on page 4.
All soft stuff will go to the new website.   

Item 1) Teaser picture about the seven properties of the number alpha. 

 Item 1) Teaser picture about the seven properties of the number alpha. 

On the other website I said lately I would post a post on the more or less elementary properties of the number alpha. But while writing that it became a bit too long and at the same time I had not opened up page 4 on this website.

So combining the stuff, I posted 3 teaser pictures on the new website while publishing the real meat in page 4. For me it is a great honor to place my fist at the heads of all those incompetent math professors with writing down just another Euler identity... 

These incompetent shitholes known as 'professional math professors' often state that the most beautiful equation they know is the Euler identity.

And as such, if they did not react all these years upon similar identities, it is clear these people are incompetent to the bone. Let's leave it with that. 

End of this update, till updates.  

(07 Feb 2016) You know I have a so called 'smart tv', it is not really smart because for example you cannot disable cookies and as such a channel like Youtube always goes on where I left. So I am always rewarded with fresh attacks from scientists on creationist and vice versa. That is the short item for today: 

Item 1) A non-black crow, creationism and evolution. 

 Item 1) A non-black crow, creationism and evolution. 

Here in Europe it is completely absent but in the USA you have all these fights between people that think the bible is literally true in every point an comma versus the standard view that life always evolves if needed. 

For myself speaking, I think that religious thought is an important evolutionary trait that after a long long time gave rise to scientific institutions. 

Today I was riding my noble iron horse and I was in a village named Southhorn (that is Zuidhorn for the locals) and I passed that strange looking crow. The crow had clearly non-black feathers but it did not look ill or so. On the contrary, for a crow it observed standard behavior; these birds are always very alert.
But I could make this photo: 

I have no clue as why this bird has lost this amount of black stuff.
I have no idea if this is a genetic thing, so it is unknown if this is evolution under your nose at work. 

Creationalists see the work of the Almighty in each and every aspect of life; for example genetics explained via evolution?
Very simple: the Intelligent Designer simply uses the same sets of genes while creating different kinds of species with it. After that those species never evolve further... 

And if you would show them the nice new zika virus that wrecks havoc in the brains of babies, it is not a virus that evolves but surely must be a punishment by the Almighty because so many people believe in evolution. 

__________ 

But on the science front you can find much of those examples too: 

Plenty of professional physics people think that if an electron circles a nucleus once, it has reversed the magnetic spin. So that only after two times going around it is in the same spin state again... 

They never say that the electrical charge of an electron oscillates in a similar fashion because even creationalists instantly see that this is nonsense. 

__________ 

This is the end of my religious sermon discussing evil creationists and demon scientists while looking at a non-black crow flying around in Southhorn...
Till updates.  

(04 Feb 2016) Two days back in the magnetic html page I posted reason number 18 as why electrons must be magnetic monopoles. In it we look at why oxygen is para-magnetic and we observe it must be the unpaired electrons that are causing this para-magnetism. So here is Reason number 18. 

Today we poke fun at the Stellarator people from the Max Planck institute, Germany: 

Item 1) Poking fun at people that believe in electron spin.

 Item 1) Poking fun at people that believe in electron spin.

First a correction: In the previous update on the Stellarator fusion reactor I told you that it took 19 years to build. Now there is also a lot of info out there that says it was 9 years. 
It is not that relevant, likely the planning started 19 years ago and the actual building was started 9 year ago. 

What is relevant is that these people are building a fusion reactor where all particles in the plasma are supposed to follow the magnetic field lines, yet all those years these people never realize only magnetic monopoles follow magnetic field lines... 

I mean; how fucked up stupid can you be? 

I am not going to explain for a second time as why these ring shaped fusion reactors are all unstable by definition. If the Max Planck institute people are to fucked up stupid to understand my 18 reasons as why electrons are magnetic monopoles, it is their problem and not mine... 

Yesterday Angela Merkel pushed the button for the second experiment and the temperature was impressive: about 80 million degrees Celcius for about 0.25 seconds. 

But once more it was claimed that in the coming months they will try to let the thing run for 30 minutes or 1800 seconds. On top of that these strange people say that this is a preparation for a continuous operational fusion vessel. 

Well, for myself speaking I am very interested what happens if you accelerate your electrons and protons second in second out. My gut feeling says these fusion vessels are instable by definition.  

But let's wait a few more months and see if indeed the whole thing will blow up in their arrogant faces. 

__________ 

In the long run, what is the lesson the profession of physics can learn from this? 

Now very simple; if from day one after the Stern-Gerlach experiment you put weird names on the observed behavior, weird names like 'intrinsic spin' you cannot make any significant progress because your mind does not grasp what is going on. 

Funny wiki link: Wendelstein 7-X 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendelstein_7-X 

Till updates my dear reader.  

(27 Jan 2016) Two more reasons as why electrons are in fact magnetic monopoles & that is today's item:

Item 1) Two more reasons as why electrons are magnetic monopoles.

 Item 1) Two more reasons as why electrons are magnetic monopoles.

I arrived at reason number seventeen as why electrons are in fact magnetic monopoles, this time I selected the diamagnetic properties of things like wood or water that are always repelled by all magnetic fields. 

And I do not need to use fancy math that no professional math professor understands, it is basic stuff like nature is always seeking to minimize energy levels. 

And minimizing energy levels seems to be a perfect explanation as why those strong permanent magnets always repel stuff like wood and water... 

Just read it at the magnetic page. 

End of this update, have a nice life or try to get one. Till updates.   

(20 Jan 2016) Yesterday on the preprint archive I found a very interesting article: 
On a novel 3D hypercomplex number system
http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.01459 

Ok the name is a bit over the top, there is nothing to 'hyper' about 3D complex numbers. Anyway now for the first time I have some evidence I was not the first: it is claimed that the original author found the 3D numbers back in 1960.  

Once more this proves it is better to avoid all contacts with university people because university people are like one dimensional people only interested in getting more tax payer money and their rankings in their publication schemes... 

__________ 

In this update I will dissect the weirdo's at CERN hunting for so called magnetic monopoles. That is our item for this update: 

Item 1) Trashing the torque hypothesis on electron spin.  

 Item 1) Trashing the torque hypothesis on electron spin. 

Long before the discovery of the electron scientists already concluded that magnetic monopoles could not exist. So when electrons were discovered about 110 years ago, despite them being electrical monopoles having an electrical charge, it was already forbidden to treat them the same. 

So even when the Stern-Gerlach experiment came along, electrons were still viewed as being magnetic dipoles. And they had a serious problem to explain:
Why did the beam of silver ions split into two? 

This was a serious problem because it was forbidden to say that it was magnetic monopole stuff that caused the whole thing, therefore the concept of 'intrinsic spin' was introduced. 

Furthermore this spin is always up or down, but why do they say this?
Now when it is up or down they talk about a vertical applied magnetic field.
When the spin is left or right they talk about a horizontal magnetic field applied. 

In that way you can always avoid talking about magnetic charge that can be measured in all kinds of magnetic fields. Because if electrons have a magnetic charge, the orientation of the magnetic field applied should not matter that very much. 

__________ 

Experimental validation of electrons having magnetic charge: 

Click on the next picture: the 3 electron cannons of the old color television spit out electrons all the same. Yet my 3 strong neodymium magnets ensure there is a circular disk where all electrons are void void void & more void. 

Now you can come up with a very complicated theory using torque explaining this while the more down to earth explanation simply says: This proves electrons carry magnetic charge.  

Click on the picture for an enlargement: 

This is the most cheap experiment disproving all that torque stuff: It uses a second hand television for 6 € while I only needed 3 of those new neodymium magnets or about 25 €. So for only about 30 Euro you can poke fun at those thousands and thousands of overpaid CERN physics people hunting the magnetic monopole in their own way. 

Let's leave it with that, till updates. 

(17 Jan 2016) This update was not planned: while reaching high in the search engine count I discovered I made two terrible typo's! 

So instead of me poking fun at the physics professors like "hey how are your dipole electrons do today?", I find myself back in the corner where the beatings are. 

Item 1) Correction of my 07 Dec 2015 update.

 Item 1) Correction of my 07 Dec 2015 update.

Since I have my new website about once I week I do some internet search engine searches like '3D complex numbers' and just see what nonsense pops up. 

I am very satisfied because results from 3dcomplexnumbers.net pop up high enough. Not on page 1 of course, there are all of those websites out there to serve the general public to answer all kinds of questions science related, ok ok I accept they hang out on page one of the search results... 

But on Google pictures, last week I was hanging out at picture number six.
And guess what? It was a teaser picture for the 6D complex numbers as constructed from 2D and 3D complex numbers... 

Not a bad result, but on inspection pure panic was on my behalf!!! 

There were two typo's in it, two minus signs that were supposed to be there were AWOL. Of course the people from the universities will say instantly:

See, just a bit more proof this guy hangs together from typo's and more weird stuff... 

__________ 

So I corrected my teaser picture and now it looks like this:  

End of this update, have a nice life or try to get one. 

(11 Jan 2016) In the new page on magnetism I added two more reasons as why electrons rather likely are magnetic monopoles. This makes the item for this update:

Item 1) Superconductivity explained via magnetic monopoles. 

 Item 1) Superconductivity explained via magnetic monopoles. 

Just a teaser picture, you see the so called Meisner effect: If you place a permanent magnet above a superconducting piece of material (mostly metals) it starts to levitate. 

So it has a high Harry Potter content, it is just like in the background Harry Potter is waiving his magic wand whispering 'Leviosa at infinitum'.    

Till updates.  

(05 Jan 2016) The last week I have been studying superconductivity type 1 and a bit of type 2. Once more the idea that electrons are magnetic monopoles is once more the last idea standing... But this item is about poking fun at the professional physics professors & about wishing you a happy new year!

Item 1) Poking fun at the ppp.

 Item 1) Poking fun at the ppp.

In my house it is well known that ppp (professional physics professors) think that electrons are magnetic dipoles. 
In my house it is also well known that there is no experimental proof for that anyway; the thing that comes most close is the Stern-Gerlach thing and what do the ppp say when talking about this experiment??? 

They often say: For some strange reason nature does not allow us to measure electron spin in more than one direction. 
They often say: Electron pairing is a quantum thing.
They say this and they say that, if they use math they come only up with 2D complex numbers, so for me this is a bunch of toddlers playing in the sand pit wearing their diapers while carrying sand from one place to the other.  

These weirdo's with their vertical S_z measurement of electron spin, these people are crazy without borders. 

In the next photo you see 'spin measurement' around the circle, or to put it mildly: In an infinite amount of directions... And when measured in an infinite amount of directions, the electrons still behave the same...   

If you click on the picture you get a larger version. Anyway now we have these strong new neodymium magnets for just 30 €, we can do experiments that measure electron spin simultaneously in a 360 degree fashion. 

__________  

Till updates & have a happy life or try to get one.  

(30 Dec 2015) Happy celebrations tomorrow & do not forget to drink a gigantic amount of beer, a tiny amount of wine or a very tiny amount of Vodka! Cheers to everyone! 

I just finished the latest update on why electrons are magnetic monopoles, here it is or click on any of the 3 teaser pictures from the previous two updates.
Till updates & see ya next year! 

(29 Dec 2015) Bah, I did sprain my ankle so I do not feel like dancing or so. Since I stopped eating bread and the poisonous gluten I did not have any joint problems for over 1.5 years. And it is also my own fault; I should not have gone exercising yesterday because that only made it worse and now I have a nice swollen foot... 

But there is also good news; I can confirm that with these new neodymium magnets you can both attract and repel electrons. So a small update on that.  

Item 1) Confirmed by experiment: electrons are not magnetic dipoles.

 Item 1) Confirmed by experiment: electrons are not magnetic dipoles.

In the 26 update I showed you a teaser picture with a black ring where all electrons were missing. Now that was caused by south pole electrons attracted to the north pole of the neodymium bipolar magnet.

Below you see the opposite, the neodymium south pole is repelling electrons, to be precise: monopole magnetic south poles. The shape of the missing electrons is explained by the fact the electrons come in with an angle at the corner of the screen. 

You can also see a bit more light under the magnet tip, these are extra north pole monopole electrons. For me this is very important because this way everybody can check self for under 50 € that I am in the right. 

Because if we wait until the first university confirms results like this, after 500 years we will still be waiting... 

__________ 

All in all these simple experiments with a small second hand television together form reason number 13 that electrons are the long sought magnetic monopoles. 

This week I will update the magnetic page with reason nr 13. 

Till updates. 

(26 Dec 2015) I bought myself a second hand particle accelerator a few days ago and combined with those new neodymium magnets I bought one month ago we can do some physical experiments. 

Item 1) For 6 € I bought that second hand particle accelerator.

  Item 1) For 6 € I bought that second hand particle accelerator.

This machine is perfect, it makes all my dreams about electrons being magnetic monopoles come out. Now the second hand particle accelerator that I bought for just 6 € is also known under the name 'color television' and mine is from the Dutch brand known as Phillips. 

But old fashioned televisions are also quantum stuff things because the old tube televisions had 3 electron cannons in them and a truly suburb copper wiring to guide the electrons to the right place in the right time. 

Anyway to make some long story short, the next teaser picture is also a teaser picture for all those overpaid physics professors. Please explain the circular disk where no electron at all reaches the screen... 

So my dear physics professors, explain in long and exhausting detail as why we have such strange black circular spots where one type of electrons is clearly missing in our very simple physics experiment.   

As you see on inspection: at the end of this magnet stuff some electrons are in, after that you get that circular band of no electrons hitting the screen and after that the whole screen if filled with electrons that hit the screen. 

A bit more detail:  

Where are the electrons gone? 
Why do they not hit the screen? 

__________ 

Stuff like this only fits inside a theory of reality where all spin half particles are also magnetic monopoles.   

End of this update, till updates.  

Archive (of these homepage files).