(16 April 2021) That Greensil scandal in the
UK is very weird. Not that my own country is completely corruption
free, for example it seems that a lot of our senators have a
tremendous amount of secondary jobs too. Of course this is always
a complicated issue; lawmakers must have access to the real
economy because they must understand in detail how stuff works.
But David Cameron texting the UK finance minister stuff like 'Hey
bro can you help me out?' is from another dimension. David Cameron
is rather pissed saying everything gets misrepresented... And
those rumors David could pocket 60 million if it all panned out
fine. Oh that is not presented honestly too? Only 25 million? Oh,
that is just a tiny amount of pocket money, I agree what is the
fuss of it all? And the weird thing is that David isn't a
Brexiteer; because the average Brexiteer has such limited
cognitive capabilities they are much more likely to fall into some
Anyway, last week I showed you the new
conjecture and I think today I found a good proof. So likely
next week on the other website I can publish it.
Item 1) The conjecture has died; long live
the new theorem!
Item 1) The
conjecture has died; long live the new theorem!
My conjecture was short lived; about one week
or so and now it is more or less proven. When I wrote it down
today on a piece of paper I had to laugh; for years I am poking
fun at the math professors like 'why do you only work with fields
so much and so often'. But for this proof I was glad I could pull
the difficulties back to a simple field and transport the results
back to the ring of integers I started in.
So am I now a hypocrite? May be, but now the
proof is understandable.
And because it is not every day that somebody finds new so called
'little theorems of Fermat' is there good hope math professors
will use it?
No of course not; math professors are not on
earth to bring the science of math forward. They are on earth so
other people can serve the giant ego of the math professors. May
be you think that space or our galaxy is a huge thing, but a few
billion cubic light years are just nothing compared to the ego of
the math professors...
Look, here is one of the best math professors
hard at work:
May be it is a good thing that you see for
yourself what math professors do with all that tax money that is
handed to them in the form of salaries & pensions. Compared to
my file it is so different: I did not have a job interview in the
last two decades and in my entire life I have never had a
non-temporary labor contract. The difference is just too big, may
be that is why they never act as a normal adult would do.
So if it is 3D complex numbers, counter
examples to the last theorem of Fermat or like now fresh so called
little Fermat theorems, you will never ever hear from those
Weirdly enough I also made a tiny bit of
progress on that giant proof of Andrew Wiles on the last Fermat
thing; I now more or less understand the opening sentence of that
proof. Before that I already crashed in the first words of that
proof. That symbol I crashed upon was some standard elliptic
curve, you can even find it with Google so if I have time I will
go on. What still puzzles me as why you would need elliptic curves
to prove the last theorem of Fermat; why do the math professors
think that elliptic curves are the way to go?
And why are the counter examples to the last
theorem of Fermat not included in the discussion? After all if
there are plenty of spaces where the whole thing does not work,
shouldn't you at least mention & explain that? But I can never
find Andrew Wiles talking about stuff like that. Of course Andrew
is one of those perfumed professors or perfumed princes; with his
Princeton professorship of course he can never react on some
amateur stuff the plebs come up with...
Such is life & it gets sucher every
Here you see the best math professor of all
times in a cubic form contemplating the latest forms of little
Fermat theorems. (Actually here name is Lilly K, she is a USA
based dancer with a clothing line):
That is what I had to say this week. Thanks
for your attention & see you in a new update in the future.
(09 April 2021) In North Ireland the
situation is more and more going out of hand. About 50+ police
wounded and of course the potential for things to get much worse.
That is all project fear we were told by the Brexiteers; it's not
going to happen. The same Brexiteers are likely now blaming the EU
for the deteriorating situation. Well that is how they are.
Let's hope for the best but it does not look
Today's update is a bit of cute math I only
found a few days ago. It is another form of Fermat's little
theorem. At this point in time I do not have a good proof so for
the time being it is just a conjecture.
Item 1) My little conjecture.
Item 1) My little
If memory serves it was in January that I
found the first counter examples to the last theorem of Fermat.
Just like expected zero reaction from the 'professional math
folks'. Ha even if I solved one or more of the so called millennium
problems the professional math folks would once more excel in once
more completely neglecting the results found...
Well that is how they are and this behavior
defines them as a group.
A couple of days ago I found a new form of
Fermat's little theorem. Fermat's little theorem is very cute and
easy to understand. It works with prime numbers, say the number 7.
Now all six numbers below 7, if you raise them to the power 7 and
do the modulo 7 thing, you get your number back.
Take 3, well 3^7 = 2187. And 2187 - 312*7 =
In math we write this as 2187 mod 7 = 3, the modulo thing gives
My new found version of Fermat's little
theorem is a tiny bit more complicated: you do not modulo just a
prime number but you must do modulo N where N is the
product of two different prime numbers, say N = pq.
Example: take 7 and 11 as the p & q in
the formula above. So we must do modulo 77.
My little Casio fx-82 calculator says:
7^11 - 25679568 * 77 = 7 and
11^7 - 253080 * 77 = 11.
To say it in words:
The reminder of 7^11 divided by 77 is 7 &
The reminder of 11^7 divided by 77 is 11.
It is a cute result and for a given pair of
prime numbers it is easy to prove, you just write the calculation
out and that's all there is to do. At the moment I do not have a
satisfactory proof but hey as time flows often new idea's come
along so I do not worry that among the collection of sleaze ball
math professors there will be one that is able to find a counter
For example, these sleaze balls were not
capable of finding counter examples to Fermat's last theorem in
over 350 years! These people are crazy to the bone, the only thing
they are good at is keeping each other stupid...
After having said that, here is the 'cube
version' of my new little theorem of Fermat:
A bit more artistic version of the above cube
Amazing how a clean math cube can transform
so fast into something that resembles North Ireland at the present
Ok, that is what I had to say for this
update. Thanks for your attention & see you around! Till
(02 April 2021) Just a few Brexit pictures
and some comment on it.
Item 1) Just a few Brexit pictures.
Item 1) Just a few
It was out say two weeks back so it is a
little late but the decline in trade to and from the UK and EU is
fascinating. But you cannot draw definitive conclusion from these
January figures, we know for example there was stockpiling so that
extra depresses the Jan numbers. Furthermore a lot of, mostly
smaller, companies indicate that they temporary halted exports to
the EU. It is impossible to estimate how much of them will start
exporting again once they understand how to do that. Also given
all the extra costs for things of animal or plant origin (stuff
like health certificates) makes it difficult to estimate how much
trade will recover.
But on it's own the January figures were a
Take for example whisky, per bottle it is
relatively expensive so the extra costs that are now in place
should not be the biggest hurdle. But clients in the EU don't
order at least one container of that stuff but at best a few
pallets. Transport companies now often refuse to load their trucks
& lorries with a few pallets from here and a few pallets from
there because if the paperwork on just one of them is not in order
the whole truck or lorry gets rejected...
It is weird to understand that if in my
country a piece of utter shit named Geert Wilders would have
gotten a political majority, this incompetent piece of shit would
have destroyed our own economy in a similar manner... Every year
this inside out asshole Geert comes with stuff that is always not
thought through: take for example a ban on the Quran. Beside it is
a weird idea to begin with, how the fuck do you enforce such a
The vaccine mess.
In the EU there is still a horrible shortage
of vaccines. That is a luxury problem because it is a miracle in
the first place that there are so many new vaccines. But we are
still exporting vaccines that are produced in the EU to other
countries, also to countries that have a third nation status like
Parasitic nations like the USA & UK never
export anything in significant numbers.
So I was totally amazed when I observed the
BoJo speaking in the UK parliament that there were no rules or
legislation that prevented vaccines going out from the UK.
A few days later it emerged that nothing
comes out of the UK, so I did not know what to think of that.
Either the BoJo is incompetent by thinking the UK exports vaccines
just like the EU or he is a 100% hypocrite.
Hint: Most of the time Brexiteers are not
liars but only dumb people because if you really think that being
outside of the EU is good for your economy you really are a stupid
person. Just like the Geert Wilders mentally ill cognitive
I exaggerated the text a bit because the BoJo
never said anything about Nazi hell hounds from the EU. But I
still do not understand why he says stuff like this: could it be
that the BoJo has a medical condition that more political leaders
Do the speaking parts of his brain work far
better compared to the other cognitive and logical functions of
his brain? If so he will sound rather smart while if you think
about it it is total cognitive crap but phrased so elegant and
smart that it sounds like real stuff.
These were a small part of my thoughts for
this week. In case you missed it, on the other website yesterday I
posted post number 181 and this one is about the so called Frey
elliptic curve and what happens if we place a counter example to
the last theorem of Fermat into that Frey thing. If you like math,
here is a link:
remarks on the Frey elliptic curve. Link used:
That was it for this update, see you around
my dear reader.
(26 March 2021) I cleaned this frontpage and
dumped a lot of stuff into the archives, we have page 14 in the
archive: index14.htm in case you
desperately needs to find something that is now deleted on this
Today I observed the BoJo stating that the UK
needs to prepare for a third wave of our beloved COVID virus
because 'It will wash upon our shores too'. Pardon me? In Europe
we have problems with new waves because the old measurements do
not work properly any longer and why is that? That is because we
are hit by the UK mutant version of the COVID-19 condition. So why
does the BoJo say stuff like that? In my view it only proves that
the average Brexiteer is relatively stupid.
In another development it was observed that
Dominique Raab said that Europe was some kind of dictatorship
because of the blocking of vaccines. Well that is an interesting
contribution that once more proves most Brexiteers are stupid to
the bone. The EU is complaining about the lack of so called reciprocal behavior: there is only vaccins going out from the EU
to, for example the UK, but zero flows back.
So my dear Dominique, who is actually the
parasite around here? It's the UK.
But I do not want to waste my time at the
opinions of the average UK Brexiteer, physics professors are
exited because of may be the so called Standard Model of physics
can finally get updated! Have they figured out that electrons are
magnetic monopoles? Of course not, they love to be stupid too, but
at least it is less irritating compared to idots like Dominique
Raab or for that matter our local idiot Geert Wilders.
No, we take a small short look at so called
Item 1) Exiting: do the smart physics
professors found a new particle?
Item 1) Exiting: do
the smart physics professors found a new particle?
Wow wow wow, even in our Dutch language the
news was found: possible new particle beyond the standard model of
physics was found! For me this is interesting because it is about
the creation of pairs of leptons and their anti version of it all.
It is no secret I think that leptons like
electrons carry magnetic charge and just like electric charge
there are only two magnetic charges: north or south. Together with
the two electric charges that leaves us with only four electron
1) Electron with a north magnetic charge,
2) electron with a south magnetic charge,
3) positron with a north magnetic charge &
4) positron with a south magnetic charge.
In my view when positron meets electron, they
will annihilate only if both the electric charge and the magnetic
charge are opposite. Annihilation will take only place when 1)
meets 4) or if 2) meets 3).
So there must be collisions between electrons
and positrons where just nothing happens because the two particles
have the same magnetic charge.
Today I am a bit exited too because I found
finally out that indeed often just 'nothing happens' when electron
meets positron. And guess what, the physics professionals name
that 'elastic collisions'.
At CERN they are just too fucking stupid to
understand that the electron as a magnetic dipole is not logical
in hundreds of ways. So if those weirdo's come up with a new
particle, better think twice about what they claim:
Has a new particle called a ‘leptoquark’ been spotted at CERN?
After five years of trying I decided to stop
the magnetic pages and stop trying to convince the so called
'physics professionals' that electrons carry magnetic charge. If
those idiots want to believe that electrons are magnetic dipoles,
let them be idiots.
In practice even if you set up collision
experiments by electrons and positrons a lot of times the
collision is just elastics and not of the annihilation nature. See
for example the next wiki:
Link used: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron%E2%80%93positron_annihilation
In my view those physics people working at
CERN are all sino's (a sino = scientist in name only). If after
over five years of explaining that electrons cannot be magnetic
dipoles and just nothing happens, these people are all sino.
Not that I am some kind of dictator, but if
logic fails year in year out there is often something going on
that is not scientific. At CERN they are really crazy, for example
they have tried to measure the mass of the anti-proton. Because
they wanted to know if that mass was exactly the same as a normal
proton. Don't get me wrong: Checking that out is of course
important. But giving some kind of proof that the electron has
actually two magnetic poles? Nope. That is why I consider them
crazy; none of them remarks this should have experimental proof
Anyway the finding that a collision of an
electron and a positron is often just a purely elastic collision
is just another strong clue that electrons & positrons are
magnetic monopoles. In the wiki I showed you above they mumble
something about 'angular momentum' because often electrons spin is
named 'intrinsic angular momentum'. A lot of those retarded inbred
imbecile physics people think there is actually something spinning
there. So let's do a little thought experiment:
|Suppose the magnetic
properties of the electron are caused by the electron
actually spinning. Now a pair of an electron and a
positron gets created, what will happen?
1) Conservation of angular momentum?
2) Conservation of total spin?
Because the electron & positron
have opposite electric charges, if they are actually
spinning in the same direction they will have opposite
'electron spin'. But that violates conservation of angular
If we want conservation of angular
momentum, in that case the two particles must be spinning
on opposite direction but that would give two times the
same electron spin. So that violates conservation of
Year in year out you never hear the
physics people about that; And because they do not talk
about that, in my view they are all sino's.
I can't find back where the source of the
pictures is, if memory serves it was the Volkskrant. And who cares
if it is illegal use of graphic material anyway? That CERN garbage
are just a bunch of sino's if they keep on thinking that it is
'logical' that electrons are magnetic dipoles.
Let's wait and see if they really have
stumbled upon a fifth force in nature.
Ok that is what I had to say. Live well and
think well my dear reader.
(19 March 2021) We had elections this week,
the voting was an interesting experience. I often vote in a church
near to my house and all those years it was just in some side room
of the church. This time it was in the main church area where the
concept of 'social distancing' was taken to a whole new
experience. It is my turn and I hand over my id and my voter pass,
do I need to take my mask off I ask. The guy looks at the photo on
my id, no take off your cap he tells me. I really had to laugh but
indeed without taking my mask off you can indeed identify me with
just the upper half of my old bold head...
The political left have gotten a beating, in
the long run it is not good that this sector of the political
spectrum gets too small. In my life I have only voted once for a
left party but it is not good if that sector gets too
Luckily that party of Geert Wilders got a
nice shaving too, that is a good thing because it shows people do
not like prolapsed assholes walking around like they are normal
persons. Bah disgusting, I do not understand why people vote for
By the way, on the other website I posted a
post about all counter examples to the last theorem of Fermat you
can make with the number 210. The math behind it is so simple that
in theory a person like Geert Wilders after some thinking could
understand it. And that idea almost makes me puke but anyway, here
is a link:
Counter examples to the last theorem of Fermat using the number
The item for this update is 'Those times the
EU annoyed me the last 10 years'.
On 20 March I added the second item.
Item 1) Those times the EU annoyed me in the
last 10 years.
Item 2) Counter examples to the last theorem of Fermat.
Item 1) Those times
the EU annoyed me in the last 10 years.
It is not a secret I am very much in favor of
Europe working together. From the historical perspective it is
well known we are very good at starting entire world wars and the
founding fathers of the EU needed a bit of stuff from preventing
flaring up such niceties again.
A very good idea was that if we make our
economies interdependent, likely this prevents a whole of of
declaring war & all the niceties that come with
Beside this, from the beginning this was good
for our economies, while there has been not that much military
conflict in all those decades. So all in all it actually
When was I annoyed in the last 10 years?
Example 1: A couple of years ago an airport
was expanded to give rise to a higher volume of air planes going
in and out. Of course the local population was not a big fan of
that and as such a local compromise was made: No extra flights in
Comes the EU flying in: This is not allowed,
evening flights should be there.
And I was really on the side of evening
restrictions and my first reaction was I was really pissed. But if
you turn your viewpoint the other way, from the EU regulators it
is well known that nations have a tendency to ultra support their
local aviation business. So I understood when it comes to
aviation, Europe rules & countries swallow.
And if you think about it a bit longer: If
done properly air safety increases when on a continental scale
regulation gets harmonized. You can't deny that.
Example 2: Lately my bank has changed the way
I must log into my bank account. In the past all I needed was my
username and a password but now they have a brand new shiny
apparatus that spits out code numbers. All of a sudden beside my
username & password I have to use that stupid code apparatus.
The argument given was 'EU regulations'.
I was pissed because now every entry into my
bank account takes more time because I have to enter that extra
code as given by the apparatus.
But again, after giving it some thought,
entry to my bank account is now more safe.
So all in all likely on the European scale,
bank fraud has gotten a tiny bit more difficult. As such I
accepted the extra work needed for just to log into my own bank
That is all I could find in being annoyed
with EU regulation for the last decade. Just two examples and both
example if you think about it a bit longer, my emotional reaction
Now compare that to an incompetent prolapsed
ass hole like the Geert Wilders guy: This idiot, this retarded
person likely has negative emotions about the EU on a daily basis.
Just like all those Brexiteers have, they only do emotion and
never do logic.
Item 2) Counter examples to
the last theorem of Fermat.
This method of finding counter examples is so
extremely simple that I can explain the method if you know that on
a standard clock if it says 15 hours you know it is 3 'o clock.
That is clock arithmetic, for a standard clock it is said you
count the numbers 'modulo 12'. For example 33 = 21 = 9 hours. And
12 = 0, that is important.
Why is that important? Wel if you multiply 3
and 4 you get 12 and in algebra the pair 3 & 4 are known as a
pair of divisors of zero. That means 3* 4 = 0. This has all kinds
of interesting consequences, for example if we add 3 and 4 and
square it we get:
(3 + 4)^2 = 3^2 + 2*3*4 + 4^2. Remark the
2*3*4 = 4*12 fades to 0 because 12 = 0.
That is how I find expressions like 7^n = 3^n + 4^n.
Now my latest post on the other website is
about stuff like this with the number 210 instead of the number
12. I have chosen 210 because that is the product of the first
four prime numbers: 2*3*5*7 = 210. You can split the four prime
numbers into seven different groups with each two factors that
multiplied always give 210.
In the next picture you see those seven different ways of splitting:
Now I was very hesitant to use this because
it is all so utterly simple. I more or less expected this to be
some standard example known for centuries as a counter example to
the last theorem of Fermat.
Of course a lot of my readers on this website
have no clue what this last theorem is, it is a negative result
from a long long time ago. About 3.5 centuries back Fermat found
that it is impossible to have four integers such that x^n + y^n
= z^n. This for powers n greater than 2 because for n
=2 this is the theorem of Pythagoras.
And for the theorem of Pythagoras there are
plenty examples that work like in
3^2 +4^2 = 5^2.
So I was rather hesitant, but I just could
not find these counter examples online and that made me scratch my
head. Could it be true that the professional math professors
skipped this easy to find result for say 350 years? It looks like
it, these easy to understand calculations are not a standard
counter example to the last theorem of Fermat.
Once more the overpaid math professors have
proven not to be worthy of their huge salaries. And my dear
reader, mark my words, even if these counter examples are easy to
understand, they will never ever talk about them. Even if you are
a young reader in the far future you will never observe a math
professor saying stuff like 'Hey here we have a bunch of counter
examples to the last theorem of Fermat'.
If you click on the next picture you will
land at the last post on this easy going math:
Ok, that is what I had to say. Till
(09 March 2021) I was just reading some news
on Google news, I was at peace with myself and I felt in harmony
with the rest of the universe. Says that retarded Google news:
Delft quantum computer will not work.
Gone is my harmony and all that peace: I
could tell you that years ago and as such nobody is interested of
course. This is now the third time I observe exactly the same news
about Delft university and their quantum computer based on
Item 1) There are too many overpaid perfumed
Item 1) There are too
many overpaid perfumed princes, WHY?
It is no secret I have been telling for over
five years that the overpaid physics professors have electron spin
a tiny bit wrong: If you think about it, it is impossible that
electrons are magnetic dipoles. All this stuff from the overpaid
professors does not make much sense; if electrons were magnetic
dipoles they could not be accelerated by magnetic fields.
If you look at the sun for example, you see
acceleration of plasma all of the time. So right in your face the
dipole nature of electron magnetism can be doubted.
Now those Majorama fermions are very
interesting because they are supposed to be there own
anti-particle. The Delft weirdo's combined an electron with a hole
(a hole is supposedly a positive electric charge) and as such they
thought to have constructed Majorana fermions as a composite
And tons of blah blah blah that you can make
topological quantum computers with that stuff. Years ago it was
easy to foresee this would never fly, just like nuclear fusion
will never work because of the acceleration of the plasma will
make all fusion reactors unstable in a short notice of time.
With the deserved failure of Delft to go the
path of the Majorama's it is worth mentioning that the university
people keep on not understanding anti-matter in particular the
positron or the anti electron.
They are correct in stating a positron must
have a positive electric charge. That is correct, but the electron
spin should also be opposite. And if you think that electrons are
tiny magnetic dipoles, what the fuck do you mean with 'opposite
Electrons simply have a magnetic charge just
like they have an electric charge. That makes logic if you think
about it. Why in chemistry you only have the electron pair that
binds the diverse atoms? Why in nuclear physics in the orbitals of
atoms you only have unpaired electrons and paired electrons?
That's just not fucking logical if electrons really would have two
magnetic poles, if they really were magnetic dipoles.
The only thing university people are good at
is being totally incompetent all of the time.
For over five years I have been explaining
this kind of stuff and 100% nothing happens: WHY do we only
appoint idiots at professor places in universities?
It is just like math professors: it is just a
bucket filled with shit. If you are a physics professor and you
think electron spin means electrons being magnetic dipoles, well
welcome into the bucket of shit you call home.
In the picture below you see two overpaid
perfumed princes in action: The perfumed prince on the left is Leo
Kouwenhoven who's ideas about Majorama fermions did not pan out
entirely as expected. The perfumed prince on the right is our
king. It has to be remarked that although overpaid, all in all our
king is not under performing like the math & physics
professors do on a daily basis...
It is totally disgusting: After five years of
explaining that electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles I am
observing this overpaid retarded dumb shit doing what they are
It is disgusting: For over five years
university people just never give proof to their retarded insights
upon electrons spin and I am supposed to be at harmony with the
universe because I have my minimal money as an unemployed person?
Please do not make me puke, if you do not
want to know more about electron spin it is fine by me. But do not
show your stupid face in 'news articles' like this.
Oh oh university of Delft, after all these
years just once more: Why not show your FUCKING proof that
the electron is a magnetic dipole?
What you say, I cannot hear you? Oh you say
next week there is a fresh batch of perfume & you are focused
on that. Ok, that is fine by me but please do not pretend to write
about science if the only thing you are interested in is the
Source of the pictures used:
Onderzoeker Kouwenhoven erkent
fout: deeltje voor quantumcomputer niet gevonden
With this speed of progress it will be about
500 years before the physics professors find out that electron
spin is monopole in nature and not the dipole magnetism they
assumed all those centuries.
End of this update on retarded perfumed
princes. Till updates.
(06 March 2021) To be honest I don't have
much to say this week. Funny news was coming from the UK where in
a lot of news papers fake news articles emerged hailing the
success of Brexit thus far. It was all 'government sponsored' aka
advertisements, articles pretending to be news but in fact
It has to be remarked however that most of
those articles indeed said they were sponsored articles so all in
all the UK is still more or less a normal functioning democracy...
Anyway for a couple of weeks I wanted to post the old photo's from
below and because I do not have much to say let that be our
Item 1) Fishing for leave & No deal is no
Item 1) Fishing for
leave & No deal is no problem!
There are significant slumps in trade both
from the UK to the EU as the other way around. So despite the fact
there is some rudimentary deal, just being outside of the EU is
causing a whole lot of trouble.
From the get go in 2016 it was of course a
stupid idea, but it was hard to foresee in detail how much could
go wrong. For example I never expected the trouble of the UK
fisheries that high, I thought that only with tariffs put on fish
the UK fisheries could be slaughtered. But no it all goes
spontaneously down hill fast so that is a good thing because the
more UK fishermen go bankrupt in the long run that is better for
the EU fishermen.
Here is one of the pictures that I wanted to
include in this website, after all this picture stands for a lot
of what was happening: Only emotional ventilation of feelings
while in practice about nothing was carefully thought
This Brexit stuff keeps on an amazing thing:
in my home country a shithole named Geert Wilders is of similar
stupidity. Always the Geert weirdo is complaining about EU this
and EU that while the tax money our shithole is paid with comes in
large part from the economical developments from the last 2
There is no difference explaining to Geert or
the average Brexiteer that being outside the EU is a stupid thing
to desire; low IQ people often do not realize how low IQ they
For the UK the present situation is damaging
for their economy but if ever my own country would do the same,
relative there would even be more economical damage. We transport
a whole lot of stuff to the rest of the EU. Suppose all things
arriving in the Rotterdam port would be subject to tariffs if it
is exported to the rest of the EU?
From the above picture I made one of those
'cubes' that look much more cute compared to a shit hole like
At last a few words about financial
derivatives. Now Amsterdam has managed for at least one month to
be the largest stock trading platform in the EU, what can be said
about financial derivatives?
For reasons I do not understand, trading
financial derivatives seems to be far more lucrative compared to
trading in stocks. Why is that? I do not know.
A stock market like the Amsterdam one is a
platform that facilitates trading in stocks of companies but they
cannot create stocks out of thin air. Ok ok they have some market
making obligations but it is not that if for example Shell is
relatively high the Amsterdam stock market thinks like 'hey lets
create a bit more Shell stock and sell it now prices are high'.
As far as I know platforms that facilitate
the trading in financial derivatives are bound to the same: they
are not allowed to create derivatives out of thin air. They only
facilitate between sellers and buyers of those derivatives.
In my view a lot of those trading in
derivatives should go to the EU now the UK is outside of our
financial markets. It is completely ridiculous that if EU
companies want to buy protection against currency fluctuation like
in the €, we must go to London or New York.
These are vital for our EU economy, we should
do that ourselves. And given the detail those kind of financial
derivatives are far more lucrative points to the likelihood that
the EU can craft far better financial products compared to what
London or NY has to offer.
Ok, that were my thoughts for this update.
Let's slaughter the London city where it comes to financial
derivatives & for the rest enjoy life as long as it
(25 Feb 2021) Oh oh those Brexiteers: For
decades they complain about all that bureaucracy that is coming
from the European institutions. And now it is often you need to
fill in 71 pages of bureaucratic stuff while in the past it were
only 2 pages for the transport of just one lorry of goods...
A lot of Brexiteers think the present
troubles from this year emerge from the EU being 'mean' or that
'they want to teach us a lesson'. That is not how it works,
because the EU is a union of states all stuff is formalized as far
as possible. As such the UK now has the status of being a third
nation and all third nations are treated the same.
Take for example those shellfish problems
that cannot be exported any longer to the EU. If that were allowed
then for example all African costal nations could say 'Hey we too
want to export unpurified shellfish to the EU. Of course we cannot
have that, the UK is now a rule taker as all other third
Today I want to do a tiny bit of math. You
can say isn't that what the other website is for? Yes of course
but this is too simple for the 3Dcomplexnumbers.net
website. We do some simple stuff every body knows: the abc formula
for solving quadratic equations.
Item 1) The two forms of the abc formula for
solving quadratic equations.
Item 1) The two forms
of the abc formula for solving quadratic equations.
In about 1982 I found a cheap math book. It
was a small pocket book, just over one hundred pages and it was
more or less only formula's and very little explanation. That was
before I had to do military service and as such also before I
became a math student. I was totally fascinated by those Fourier
series; how could a bunch of sines produce a tooth saw shaped
That pocket book also contained the two forms
of abc formula. And although it is very easy to prove these two
forms are the same, for me it was a surprising result.
If you want to prove this you must use the
first formula with the 'plus' sign and equal that to the second
formula with the 'minus' sign. That is why in the first abc
formula you see a plus-minus sign while in the second abc formula
this is a minus-plus sign.
Anyway if you work out this equation you will
find that 4ac = 4ac. But 4ac = 4ac is an expression
that is obviously true and from that you can conclude that your
starting equation was also true.
In theory that is how math is supposed to
work; finding things that are true. In practice like in any other
social structure the internal communication is always more like a
greatest common divisor. So if math professors talk to each other,
they keep it always as simple as possible so that even the most
idiot math professor will understand these internal
communications. For example '3D complex numbers do not exist' is
one of those internal communications that even the most idiot math
professor can understand and repeat when needed.
As such those simple statements like '3D
complex numbers do not exist' become a binding factor inside the
profession of mathematics. Inside physics you have the same kind
of untrue simplifications like 'If you cut a magnet in two, you
always end up with two smaller magnets'. Because this is something
even the dumbest physics professor can easily remember stuff like
that takes a life on it's own and as such becomes a binding factor
in the social structure of physics professors. That makes it
logical as why physics people without any experimental proof talk
about electrons as if they have two magnetic
But hey let that university crap be what it
is: the crap of a social structure known as a university. I hope
the next picture is a bit readable, anyway it is still the two
ways of abc formula for solving a quadratic equation:
Ok, have fun with your proof of the two abc
formula's & till updates. Updated one day later: I found
a video about a person named George Eustice, I never heard about
him but he claims the EU has been flip flopping on the shellfish
detail. The video is made by Maximillian Robespierre in his 'Fool
of the week' series. Maximillian often thinks that Brexiteers are
lying, in my view that is often not correct. Brexiteers are not
lying, they are just more stupid and as such it might look as if
they are lying. Compare it to the physics professors; in the last
five years have I ever said they were lying about electron spin?
No I have not done that. Those professors might be telling
nonsense about electron spin but they only do their best, they are
not deliberately lying or so.
Anyway, here is the video:
Fool Of The Week - Brexiteer George Eustice
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQ2xYjQzRI0
That was it for this extra update. Till
(19 Feb 2021) Brexit is going as good as it
possibly can be; it will likely take a few more months before the
majority will realize this is bad for the UK economy. On the other
hand the average Brexiteer has cognitive capabilities that are
below of that of the population. So they will blame the corona
pandemic on their future economical development.
In this update two items: An old Brexit
picture from 2016 and the Microsoft Bing search engine is going
bonkers again on the 3D complex numbers (it goes bonkers in the
Item 1) This old picture again.
Item 2) Bing search engine going bonkers again.
Item 1) This old
It keeps on being a fascinating subject; how
can a society like the UK society do all this weird stuff? You can
argue that the ruling elite like the conservatives do not
understand on a detailed level how the economy actually works. Not
that I myself understand all the fine details of a continent wide
economy like we have here in Europe, but I do not claim retarded
stuff that it is better to be 'outside of Europe'.
But in the UK the anti-EU sentiment has
slowly been growing over the decades. Why it has never cleaned
itself is unknown to me. May be only after the stuff runs out of
hand there will be some changes. I do not know and I do not care,
it is just fascinating to watch this weirdness going on and on and
It is a weird mindset they have over there; a
By the way, how are your fisheries going my dear UK?
Item 2) Bing search
engine going bonkers again.
A couple of months back when I did a search
on the Microsoft search engine Bing on my hobby of the 3D complex
numbers, to my surprise I had total dominance. Over half of the
pictures shown were from my other website upon 3D complex numbers.
So later I wanted to write an update on that
detail but at that point in time all of a sudden the picture
search was back to normal. Ok, it is better that things are normal
but if Bing goes bonkers on a search phrase like '3D complex
numbers' it is not that an extra amount of people die from that
for no reason at all.
So it is not much of a real problem, it only
shows that the Bing search engine can make a bit more
improvements. There is the potential to get better to say it
I made a screenshot from this simple search,
if you click on the picture below you get large version. Or you
make a Bing search upon '3D complex numbers' for yourself...;)
Anyway, it is not guaranteed that in the
future this kind of picture search on Bing will stay the same.
Here is the fun:
So once more and likely for a short time I
have full spectral domination on those Bing search results. That
can be classified as a temporary success.
But in my life there are also giant failures:
the physics professors still completely for the full 100% do not
want to engage the idea that electrons can't be magnetic dipoles.
Electrons are magnetic monopoles, but the internet search engines
of this world only say 'Go fuck yourself'.
Ok, let's leave it with that. Till updates my
(13 Feb 2021) Ah, the first 'weaponization
talk' of UK financial services observed. It is only two stupid
Brexiteers talking to each other so it is not UK government policy
or so. But we cannot have it that for example government bonds of
EU countries run into trouble; essential financial services is
something we have to do ourselves now the UK is a third nation.
Item 1) Brexit dividend: Amsterdam stock
trading volumes soaring...:)
Item 1) Brexit
dividend: Amsterdam stock trading volumes soaring...:)
The numbers are staggering, this is not some
calm year on year percentage growth. Nope, compared to December
last year trading volume on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange is four
times as big in January this year. On top of that trading in CO2 emissions
went from the UK to my beloved Amsterdam.
Without doubt now volumes are soaring there
will be all kinds of extra costs to be made by the AEX but I want
to urge that as soon as possible trading costs should come down.
That means that for the AEX (that is a company in itself) it is
not good if four times the volume means four times as much
profits; nope! It is not going to happen that with two fingers in
the nose they will make boatloads of money.
Our financial markets should work as
efficient as possible, in the long run that is best for our
economy. Now a large part of my own portfolio is composed of
financial stocks and bonds so I love the dividends and the coupons
but please stay normal: the thing known as the economy where
actual stuff is made and a lot of people have a job is far more
Well let's hope for the best, after all we
only have one month of soaring trade volume in. Let's try to
But the numbers are truly staggering; Daily
volume in Amsterdam in January was above the daily average in the
UK over the year 2020. That is boink boink bonkers!
Never forget that the Brexit rather likely
will be very bad because it is a stupid idea in the first place.
So over time frustration in the UK will build up more and more and
because for decades they blame a lot of things that go wrong
inside the UK on the EU we must be prepared to take these matters
into our own hands.
We must get free from the expensive shackles
of the London financial hub.
It is important that this all gets organized
a bit efficient so that the costs of financial services are low. A
simple tactical reason for that is that the BOE came out with a
statement just a few days ago that this 'countryfication' of
financial services away from their London thing will only bring
higher costs... Let's hope that a few years down the line the BOE
still doen not understand what has struck them and why it was so
Ok, today I observed the first video about
weaponization of the UK financial services industry. It doen not
amount to much because it is from a guy named Michael Heaver and
that is not a very smart person. I mostly look at Michael his
video's as a for of entertainment; what retarded stuff does
this person have today? I am always exited to hear the latest
insights on why the Brexit is going so good...
Anyway Michael was talking to another
Brexiteer named Ben Habib and this Habib guy came up with a simple
scheme to drive up the costs for EU government bonds to 'go
through the roof' as he said himself.
Again: it does not amount to much. I do not
think at this moment in time the BoJo government is working on
plans like that. But the last four years of USA politics have
learned us it can go very fast from just 'standard a little bit
crazy' to the daily madness we had to endure from the USA over
that last four years.
Anyway this is how this low IQ weirdo Ben
Habib looks, if you click on the picture you will land at the
Silly title of the video: Boris Urged To STAND UP To EU Bullying
Ok, that was it for this update. For myself
speaking I hope we more or less succeed in developing efficient
financial services inside Europe. Don't forget that however the
trading volumes as quoted above are spectacular, it is only one
day in making Europe a better place to live in.
Till updates my dear reader.
(08 Feb 2021) On 08 Jan so exactly one month
ago I showed you that video from a glass-eel farmer that now
cannot export to the EU any longer. That farmer was in the past
very upbeat about Brexit because of 'all the possibilities' it
gave for expanding the economy. Now in that video there was also
some Brexit reporter routinely talking stuff like 'But we study
this for two decades and constantly there is all kinds of red tape
coming from the EU' and at first I was impressed because of the
words 'We study this for two decades'.
When I would study something for two decades
I would know a lot about it; take for example the 3D complex
numbers that over the last 30 years have been studied by me about
one decade long. If you study things for a long time your
knowledge starts to accumulate faster and faster and at this point
in time it is likely that on this little planet I am the guy who
knows the most about that subject.
Now I came across this horrible video from
Jacob Rees Mogg and Jacob was interviewed by somebody from the
Institute of Economic Affairs and I just could not believe my eyes
and ears. So that is our item for this update.
Item 1) Is Jacob Rees Mogg a totally retarded
Item 1) Is Jacob Rees
Mogg a totally retarded person?
The guy from the IEA asks Jacob the next
question: Now that we are out of the EU we can make our own
legislation and as such we could get rid of the VAT on female hygiene
products, can you give us some more examples of how we can benefit
and change legislation now we are out of the EU?
To my utter surprise Jacob explains there are
many many bad legislations and rules directly related to the EU.
And he explains it will take time to change them because of the legislating
process and the way parliament works and the troubles with the
pandemic that slows the stuff.
But he just does not give one fucking
Those guys have studied the evils of the EU
for two decades or longer and the only thing they come up with are
VAT free tampons...
Let me repeat it once more:
The only thing they come up with are
VAT free tampons!
And Jacob, ultra smart as he is, throws the
ball back by saying the people from the IEA should inform the ERG
(that is the European research group from our cognitive here
Jacob) so that they can take action.
I have seen this more often; Every time a
Brexit person complains about all that legislation from the EU and
you ask them 'Can you give just one example of a law that is bad
for the UK?' they never come up with only one evil law.
So this is more confirmation of what I wrote
lately when I compared the Brexiteers to a modern platoon; since
Brexit is a stupid idea in the first place it only attracts people
with diminished cognitive capabilities.
No nice pictures today because I did not have
the time, but nine minutes into the next video you can find some
deep fundamental proof that Jacob is in fact a total retarded
person: There are thousands and thousands of... All blah blah blah
In Conversation with The Rt Hon Jacob
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGOzTGUwqQ8
Now we must not loose ourselves in all these
day to day tactical things, in the long run the EU must get free
from the shackles of the UK financial city. Are these 'financial
services' good for the EU now the UK slowly is becoming a hostile
Or am I exaggerating a little bit here? No I
am not, now the UK has a third nations status it cannot be that
vital financial services come only from London. The BoJo is more
or less a reasonable person but as soon as the UK people elect a
donald trump clone, the financial services of the UK will be used
as a weapon against Europe.
Ok, let's leave it with that. Till
(03 Feb 2021) A lovely row erupted a few days
ago when the EU threatened to temporary lift the North Ireland
protocol. The Brexiteers were in all states while of course non of
those cognitive handicapped people remembered that just a few
weeks ago the BoJo did exactly the same. And the UK themselves
have a list of medicines that are forbidden to export, but when
the EU wants to do something at the vaccination situation we are
of course pure evil...
In the update we take another look at the
niceties of the Brexit and once more we will understand that as a
group the Brexiteers lack conitive capabilities (on average they
are more stupid compared to the average of the population).
Item 1) Is trade with fast growing nations
important? Brexiteers say yes.
Item 1) Is trade with
fast growing nations important? Brexiteers say yes.
Brexiteers, retarded and stupid as they are,
now constantly tell that the situation at the border is perfect
and all that stuff from 'project fear' just did not materialize.
But as a matter of fact a lot of food like fish and meat just
can't be exported because it takes so long that it starts to rot.
So for the time being it is bye bye fisheries. For shell fish it
seems to be the same; normally they got produced in the EU because
in the UK they do not have the facilities. But decade old rules
say that for safety only processed shell fish can be imported from
third nations... I do not understand why those UK fishers
specializing on that kind of food never ever thought that through
before the Brexit was there. Once more: Brexiteers are more stupid
than the average person and the fishermen voted overwhelmingly for
As far as I am concerned: to the hell and
beyond with those weirdo's.
Wine also seems to be a problem. The UK has a
relatively large wine importing industry and just like in my own
country due to climate change it is more and more possible to make
local wines. Anyway the trade in wine is also falling apart and
that is a good thing because it confirms what I said in the very
beginning: Brexit is a stupid idea.
But beside Brexit being a stupid idea, the UK
government itself is often also rather lunatic. The most weird
story was from some expensive second hand watch trader. Think for
example at a Rolex. Normally as a trader you pay VAT to the
government and only that added value gets taxed. Remember VAT =
Value Added Tax. But now all of a sudden if they want to sell an
expensive watch to some customer in the EU they must pay VAT over
the full price... So if this trader buys an expensive watch for
8000 pounds and sells it for 10000 pounds all of a sudden the VAT
must be paid over 10000 instead of 2000 pounds... Once more:
Brexiteers are stupid.
In a video from 'A different bias' it is
claimed over 50% of the lorries leaving the UK are empty. If true
a lot of export has just fade overnight from 31 Dec to 01 Jan...
Once more: that is a good thing because it confirms what I thought
about this all.
Click on the picture if you want to see that video:
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAHeuyJrKhM
Lately I oberved Nigel Farage stating that it
was better for the UK to seek alliance in trade with fast growing
nations like those from the Trans Pacific Partnership nations.
Nigel Farage is like our own Geert Wilders (also anti EU all the
time year in year out). If I listen to the logic of people like
that to my mind comes a lot of gay porn video's where the males
have anal prolapses and they love it. I do not love that and find
it disgusting. Just like the logic of Geert Wilders or Nigel
Farage is disgusting to me.
So how useful is it to trade with fast
growing nations? Let's compare two nations say Vietnam and
Germany. I did not check if the next numbers are actually correct
but you will get the picture easily:
The Vietnam GDP per capita is about 2500 €,
the German per capita is about 40000 €.
Suppose without all this pandemic stuff the German GDP grows say
2%, per German citizen that is a growth of 800 €.
Suppose in a particular year the Vietnam GDP expands by 10%. Well
that is about 250 € per capita Vietnam citizen...
Do you see how retarded the logic of Nigel
Farage is? Vietnam is at the other side of the globe, why should
Vietnam people want to buy UK stuff? The Nigel guy is a shitshow
on all levels possible.
Luckily not all things in the UK are going
from bad to worse. They have a new under secretary that handles
immigration! And I was just flabbergasted; why can't we have
political leaders like that?
So instead of listening and looking at
another worthless piece of shit like Priti Patel the UK males can
look at this female doing the immigration stuff in the UK:
Now what is wisdom in this time and age? Is
wisdom found in complaining that if we look at the average
European parliament there are never good looking sluts dressed in
latex clothing? Or do we need more math inside the heads of
prolapse Nigel Farage & Geert Wilders? And what does the bible
say about pandemics?
Ok, that was it for this post.
For older updates see the archives at index14.htm
or go to the oversight
of the archive pages.