(08 Feb 2020) Today was a hilarious day for
me and therefore we are going to look at an hilarious video from
Sean Carroll. Sean is one of the television professors in physics,
often his videos are fun to watch. Today it was funny once more,
it starts with complaining that physics professors even don't try
anymore to understand quantum physics... That is hilarious because
I have the same problem: math professors have centuries ago given
up on understanding complex numbers in higher
How brain rot like that sets in I don't know,
luckily I do not have that kind of brain rot.
But serious, let's talk a bit about the classical electron and the
many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Here we go:
Item 1) My problem with the many worlds
interpretation of QM.
Item 1) My problem
with the many worlds interpretation of QM.
The classical electron: Sean first lamentates
that his colleagues have given up on trying to understand quantum
mechanics. That is funny to watch because just a few minutes later
he shows he has given up on trying to understand the classical
At 8.55 minutes into the video Sean explains
that a moving (or accelerating) electron brings a change in the
electric field the electron produces. And this movement, this
shaking, is what causes photons to go out of the electron.
Of course he only talks about the electric
field of the electron, but photons are famous for being a magnetic
field and electric field at the same time with some
If electrons are magnetic dipoles, for most
of the shaking you do to an electron the magnetic field will
interfere with itself and cancel more or less out. Yet it is well
known that there also are two kinds of circular photons, say left
and right circular photons. In my view where the electrons carry
magnetic charge, you will always get two different kind of
photons. The difference is in the magnetic field: they are phase
shifted by 180 degrees...
I have to admit however that after all those
years I still have poor understanding of what a photon actually
is, I will never give up trying but I have also accepted that some
person who is much smarter then me will may be one day finally
The video has the title A Brief History of Quantum Mechanics - with Sean Carroll
Or click on the picture:
Ok, now for the so called 'many worlds
interpretation' of quantum mechanics. In a nutshell it says that
everywhere where there is some quantum process going on, all
possibilities will actually emerge and the world will split into
the different possibilities every quantum split gives.
Now I have a long list of problems with this,
the most important is that for this to be possible all
probabilities must always be rational numbers. Only if
probabilities are rational numbers, you can get the same ratio's
in 'new worlds'.
Simple example: We throw a dice with equal probability
on each of it's six sides. According to the many worlds people the
world will split into six versions and in each of those versions a
different number from that dice came up.
You can also say probabilities should come in
quanta with rational relations between those. Suppose you have
some probability event where there are only two outcomes say A and
B. The probability of outcome P(A) is one half of the square root
of 2 so for all probabilities to add up to 1 we must have P(B) = 1
Tiny problem: The ratio P(A)/P(B) is not a
rational number, so how the fuck do you split up this stuff in a
whole lot of different worlds?
Of course, since Sean is one of those famous
television physics professors, he just never addresses such tiny
problems; from the explanation of the classical electron to the
explanation of the many worlds thing, it is always highly
entertaining but of course it is not science.
Let's leave it with that beside the tiny fact
I also upload reason
nr 82 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles in page five
of the magnetic pages. So all in all it was a hilaric day with a
tiny bit of real science. Till updates my dear reader.
(04 Feb 2020) The Wuhan virus keeps on
spreading, it could also give contamination via the so called
fecal oral route... The real fatality rate in the entire
population is still completely unknown but it could be that people
who seek medical help have a fatality rate of about
But today no more depressing viral news but
let's celebrate Brexit! Today I was able to watch an entire video
of about 30 minutes long with Boris Johnson holding a speech.
Boris is often fun to watch and you do not need a bucket for your
vomit like when you listen to donald trump aka Shithole One. Let's
turn it into a simple example: Australian beef.
Item 1) Australian beef and import tariffs.
Item 1) Australian beef
and import tariffs.
Suppose Europe has tariffs on meat coming
from Australia, I don't know if that is actually the case but for
the purpose of this example let's suppose it does. (Since beef is
an agricultural product likely it has a tariff on it.)
Suppose further there are no tariffs on meat
between the UK & the EU and the UK enters a free trade
arangement with Australia and from that point in time between the
UK & Australia there are no tariffs on beef.
Of course when this happens, the EU is more
or less forced to implement tariffs on beef coming from the UK and
that is logical: If I cannot import beef from Australia but my nephew
in the UK can and after that export it it the EU, it is clear my
nephew has a so called unfair bias to his advantage.
It does no go with only with beef; every time
for any product where the UK strikes such a deal against lower
import tariffs then the EU has, there is a similar problem. The UK
cannot eat 15 cakes and have them too while European citizens
cannot trade that way, so additional tariffs on all that stuff has
to come in place when it comes to trade between the UK & the
So if we are able to strike a trade deal
between the UK & the EU this year, best it that it would have
some form of floating tariffs that will automatically rise
depending on what deal the UK strikes with other nations. After
all is that automatic tariff adjustment is already in the trade
deal between the EU & UK, the UK can decide for herself what
kind of trade deals they want with other
End of the example.
In case you want to see 30 minutes of Boris
Johnson explaining his view on trade reality, here is the video
with the strange title:
Boris Johnson threatens to COLLAPSE Brexit trade talks if EU insist we stick by their rules
Why this title of the video is so hysterical
I don't know. May be it is because the video was published by the
British tabloid the Sun. And likely the Sun is one of those
tabloids that come up with news like 'The EU forces British cows
to wear nappies' or 'The EU forbids UK male hairdressers to wear
It has to be remarked that in the video Boris
easily explains why free trade is important and I wholly agree
with that. If entire countries can simply concentrate on their
sectors in the economy that do it good, like our Dutch
agricultural sector, and we can export and import as we like and
see fit, that is better for the overall economy on a global
All the EU wants is a level playing field, as
far as I know there is no reason for British cows to wear nappies.
May be British so called journalists working for fantastic UK
tabloids like the Sun wearing nappies is a good idea. After all if
the Wuhan virus also spreads via the ass to mouth method, within
two days all those tabloid journalists will have the Wuhan virus
once only one of them would carry it... The British tabloids are
good in the ass to mouth thing don't you think?
Let me close this update with a screen shot
from the Boris Johnson speech:
Ok, let's leave it with that. Don't forget
about the 'floating tariffs' while recognizing free trade is good
for global economical growth. Till updates.
(28 Jan 2020) Wow that is some nasty new
virus that emerged in China: an incubation time up to 14 days but
during incubation already the virus spreads. And a spreading ratio
over 1, that is every person with this virus contaminates on
average over 1 new person. So I really wonder if this can be
contained, this looks like a nasty combination. The only good
thing is that it is not that lethal, mortality rate is only 3% but
since this is a new virus this can change of course.
As an antidote against so much troublesome
news let us today look at another video from Australia on quantum
stuff in general and dipole behavior in particular.
Item 1) Why would (electric or magnetic)
dipoles anti align?
Item 1) Why would
(electric or magnetic) dipoles anti align?
Electric dipoles are just pairs of particles
close to each other like the electron & proton in a hydrogen
atom. Ordinary water molecules are also dipoles.
Dipoles can be attracted to other dipoles but
most of the time they all will align in the same direction because
as such they can form chains. Only when the distance between the
two electrical charges is relatively large, it is possible that a
pair forms that are anti aligned. Just like when you have two long
bar magnets attract each other if you anti align them and put them
together along the long sides.
From electrons it is known that they only
pair up, never make structures like 3 or 4 electrons together, and
that it is so called anti aligned (one is spin up, the other spin
down relative to a vertical applied magnetic field). Furthermore
it is known that the electric charge of the electron is as
spherical as possible.
So my dear reader, if electrons only form
pairs, can they be magnetic dipoles?
I think they can't be magnetic dipoles, but
by now this is well known I hope. Only yesterday on the other
website I used another video of Andrea Morello, it is important to
emphasize I do not hate him or so. On the contrary, he even writes
with his left hand just like I do. We left handed people are a
superior sub species inside humanity... ;)
So I crafted a nice heart shape in the next
screen shot and if you click on it you will land at the Youtuve
video I made the screen shot from. The title is quantum attraction
and I simply think that electrons pair up because they have
opposite magnetic charges and not some weird magnetic dipole
Link in the picture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4D9AuWEx0rA
Ok, why the hell should dipoles anti align?
Why not think about that a little bit?
Till updates my dear reader and don't get sick or so... Till
(14 Jan 2020) At the end of last year I
considered stopping with the magnetic pages. After all there is
zero point zero response so just like with the higher dimensional
complex numbers it is not important any longer what I write down.
The only thing that is left important is that 'I know'. After if
those university professors are that smart, why don't they figure
it all out themselves?
But rather soon I came across more nice stuff
that confirms electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles and if the
Parker solar probe brings good observational stuff around, why not
write about it. So I opened page 5 in the series of magnetic
Item 1) Ok ok, a new page on magnetics opened
for this year 2020.
Item 1) Ok ok, a new
page on magnetics opened for this year 2020.
After a few video's of looking at the new
found results from the NASA Parker solar probe I decided like ok
ok, one more page on the magnetic stuff. But digging in a bit
deeper, there was that rather confusing picture depending the
result I was interested in: rapid changing direction of the local
This is the confusing picture (if you click
the picture you land on page 5 of the magnetic stuff):
But later I remembered how the official
version of solar spots more or less goes. It goes like this:
Inside the sun there are all those magnetic
bands going round.
But at the solar equator the rotation goes faster compare to the
solar polar regions.
That causes those magnetic bands to knot like rubber bands.
That explodes and that causes those solar eruptions...
For myself speaking I think this is a bizarre
line of reasoning. But I never found anything more logical in
those five years that I look for validation if the electron is a
magnetic dipole or not. All in all it is thought that magnetism
from inside the sun creates all that stuff at the solar surface. I
think that most magnetism on the solar surface is locally
generated by rotating plasma. View it as tornado like structures
of plasma ending at the surface of the sun; basically they are
electro magnets although of course the sun does not need copper
wiring like we mere mortals do... ;)
Ok, that was it for this update. See you
around. (Magnetic page 5 was updated on 22 Jan, I was lucky
to find back that bizarre explanation from the university of
Glasgow. Go check
(05 Jan 2020) Lately I observed some video
from Sabine Hossenfelder and for some strange reason it does not
leave my mind. Sabine is a physics female and she is funny because
she dares to have comments on how this science all goes. And I
often agree with her on stuff like no new giant LHC of over 20
In the video that is about stuff that hinders
scientific progress, Sabine is a bit too polite with things like
'cognitive bias' and 'social reinforcement'. For myself I use
words like 'keeping each other stupid'. So that is our item for
Item 1) Is social reinforcement a thing that
makes you stupid?
Item 1) Is social
reinforcement a thing that makes you stupid?
Why can science stand so long outside reality
for no reason at all? Scientific history is loaded with examples
for that: The guy that figured out it was better to wash your
hands properly and thoroughly when assisting females to give birth
was ridiculed and it took about 70 years before better medical
practices arrived at the scene.
Both the math guy Cantor and the physics guy
Boltzman got their fair share of ridiculization. Yet at present
day their work still stands...
Let me give you an example of what I have
been working on the last years; the 3D complex numbers. In math
you have a pair of theorems known as the Hurwitz 2, 4, 8 and the
Frobenious theorem. Loosely speaking these theorems say that there
are no division field like the complex plane possible in 3D space.
Yes this is true, a field is impossible but why do people think
there is only 'nothing'?
After all that is the math professor bias: 3D
complex numbers cannot exist.
End of the example.
Example 2: People with tattoos. Tattoos are
often a very individual expression and as such it materializes in
the form of a picture on the human skin. So those who have a lot
of tattoos have done a lot of individual expression, but from a
distance they all look the same.
Example 3: Math professors trying to think
independently. If you are a math professor you are supposed to
come up with smart stuff all of the time. But you work in an
environment where the other professors are doing the same. Suppose
you are that stupid to bring forward 3D complex numbers; that is
not good for your career.
In my view there are many ways science gets a
long term hold on making progress. The 'keeping each other stupid'
is an important stabilization process. On the other hand it is
often better that progress is slow and evolutionary instead of a
fresh shock every day.
So pop up a pint and enjoy the wisdom of
Ok, let's leave it with that. Till updates.
(05 Dec 2019) Oh oh, the century long search
for the magnetic monopole goes on and on. The weirdo's are looking
for a particle that is a magnetic monopole and that's it. It is
never mentioned that it could have electric charge or for that
matter: it is a magnetic monopole but an electric dipole...
In this world there is never a shortage of
Item 1) Hey weirdo's why don't you actually
prove the electron is a magnetic dipole?
Item 1) Hey weirdo's why don't you
actually prove the electron is a magnetic dipole?
The year 2019 is walking on it's last days,
so what do professional physics professors do? Actually prove for
the very first time that the electrons is a magnetic dipole?
Of course not, after all they get their
salaries by just not doing that.
Compared to my life (right now about 17 years
of unemployment, never got just one job interview) these people
behave very strange.
Ok, if you have a paid job you must bow for
the common wisdom. I understand that, if I would get 5000 € a
month for telling people that Jesus is the son of God and Mary was
still a virgin at the birth of Jesus, I would do that...
Hey weirdo's from the field of physics, why
don't you cough up some experimental evidence that the electron is
actually a magnetic dipole?
Want some proof that the physics
professionals are weirdo's? Here we go:
New result in hunt for mysterious magnetic monopoles
More weird stuff from LIGO:
for Magnetic Monopoles
Oh oh, a new decade is on the horizon. When
will physics pop up some experimental evidence that is needed?
Come on, one new decade will likely not be enough time...
Let's end my short rant with a joke:
If the many worlds theory of quantum mechanics
is for real, in that case on many worlds they will have a better
theory of the electron.
In case you think that is not funny, are you
a weirdo too?
Oops, before I forget it. A few days back I
posted reason number 80 as why electrons cannot be magnetic
dipoles in the magnetic pages. Here is a link:
80: Does magnetic reconnection disprove Gauss' law of magnetism?
End of this update.
(25 Nov 2019) A small Brexit update. For
years now I am figuring out what benefits there would be to the UK
in leaving Europe and the European market. Until now I only found
fishing, if the UK can ban all other countries from her
territorial waters they will indeed have more fish...
As a comparison, after Brexit all UK
financial firms will be foreign companies operating in the EU,
just a small change in regulation will bring much more damage. You
need to catch an awful lot of fish to compensate for that.
And, ha ha ha, may be the EU can slap 100% tariffs
on UK fish since it is not non-EU fish... That would be
Item 1) Are UK financials going to Amsterdam?
Item 2) Why did I do that internet seach?
Item 1) Are UK
financials going to Amsterdam?
To put things a bit in perspective; exports
from the Netherlands to the UK is about 3% of GDP. If Brexit goes
wrong say about one third of that will disappear. So a damage of
1% of GDP. After a couple of month of natural growth of the
economy the damage will be gone...
Yet it is more complicated; if those
industrial supply chains get disrupted this could have all kinds
of unforeseen consequences. Anyway, Fortune has a nice article
telling us about the move to Amsterdam. For the Dutch economy this
might be good, but the housing market is already under great
pressure and those financial jobs often have high salaries. As
such they can disrupt the Amsterdam housing market even
In the Wake of Brexit, Amsterdam Is the New London
It is also election season in the UK and as
such it is the time for hollow slogans. For myself speaking I have
no idea what 'Unleash Britain's potential' actually means. That
are words from some strange fantasy land. May be better would be
the slogan 'At least we can eat fish'.
Let's leave that strange process known as
Brexit with that.
Item 2) Why did I do
that internet search?
This evening I tried it one more time: do an
internet search for 'Why do electrons pair up?'. And only nonsense
comes up. For example the electron pair is magnetically neutral
because one is spin up and the other with spin down compensates
Why did I do that stupid internet search? If
it is true that the electron is a magnetic dipole, in that case it
would be neutral for a magnetic field almost by definition. Just
like atomic hydrogen is neutral for electric fields. But electrons
are not neutral to magnetic fields while the electron pair is
neutral for magnetism.
What I do not understand is all those people
explaining the importance of a 'spin up' combined with a 'spin
down' is that they do not see they are talking nonsense. After all
the impossibility of electrons to be magnetic dipoles is just
If the electron pair is neutral for magnetism
and the unpaired electrons not, in that case it is not logical
that electrons are magnetic dipoles. Hence they are magnetic
Why was I that stupid to search once more for
that idiot nonsense? I might equally dumb slam my head with a
rubber hammer every day, that is equally stupid...
Ok, it is time to pop up a bottle of home
brewed beer. By the way, I use British malts in all of my beers.
All of a sudden I am in a panic that in the future I cannot use
those specialty malts any more... Really true ;)
Till updates my dear reader.
(14 Nov 2019) Over in the USA the impeachment
hearings of Shithole One (that's donald trump) have begun. It was
really funny to observe those stupid republicans stating that
'There is one person that started this all. And this person, the
whistle blower should also test before this hearing'. Of course
one of the democrats was so witty to observe that he would love it
if the person that started it all would testify before the House.
If would be great if donald trump came over to testify...
It is hard to say if Shithole One will
actually be impeached, likely republican senators will support
that mentally ill person known as Shithole One.
But I don't want to talk politics but the
next cute video about the Casimir effect and black holes.
Item 1) The Casimir effect & black
Item 1) The Casimir effect
& black holes.
The video is 11 minutes long and goes about
the uncertainty principle, the Casimir effect, energy in a vacuum
and evaporation of black holes.
First a few remarks: The uncertainty
principle is often used to imply that in the vacuum of space all
kinds of pairs of particles can jump in and out of existence. As
long as it cannot be measured, it can exist. The problem I have
with this is that it does not quantify anything. For example is
there on average just one pair production every billion year in a
space of a billion cubic light years? Or in one cubic centimeter a
billion pairs produced every nano second? That is always swept
under the carpet...
Second remark: The Casimir effect can very
well be explained by unpaired electrons with opposite magnetic
charge and that as such those small metal plates attract each
other pure on local magnetism. Remark the plates are pushed
together to a distance of about one micro meter, that pushing act
alone can ensure the electrons that feel repelled by the presence
of the other metal plate to move to a position with less repel or
even attraction. It was years ago I figured this out, at present
day I am still met with a big wall of silence. Hendrik Casimir was
a Dutch guy, for me it is a pity that Dutch physics professors at
present day are just a bunch of cowards year in year out.
But hey, look at the local math professors who that for decades...
Apparently it is an academic tradition to be a bunch of cowards
just all of the time.
The third and last remark is about Hawkin
radiation: For years I suspected that Hawkin radiation of black
holes was based on the Casimir effect. In the video they are not
clear about that. Using the Casimir effect to estimate the energy
density of a vacuum is known as the 'vacuum catastrophe' because
they are about 120 orders of magnitude wrong. So I still don't
know if Stephen Hawkin based his theory of vaporizing black holes
on the result of the Casimir experiment or on other estimates of
the vacuum zero-point energy.
If based on the Casimir effect, the Hawkin
radiation can also be thrown into the dustbin of history. Just
like quantum computers based on electron spin, nuclear fusion
reactors and so on and so on.
Here are two screen shots in one picture,
click on the picture to view the video from the Youtube channel
Youtube link in the above picture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRcmqZkGOK4
Ok, that was it for this update. As soon as I
have found that Hawkin radiation is based on the results of the
Dutch guy Hendrik Casimir I will use that as a future reason as
why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles...
Till updates & as usual have a nice
Brexit or try to get one.
(05 Nov 2019) Oops, it is about time to
update a bit because otherwise people will start to wonder if I am
still alive... It is true I update a bit less lately but I also
had other things to do and I did not have much to say. Of course
all that Brexit stuff is still very interesting while that
mentally ill donald trump thing has now told about 14 thousand
lies during his presidency. Why people vote a mentally ill person
as their president is unknown to me, latest crazy news: trump says
no federal money for California wildfires... Why do you vote a
mentally ill person into a position like that?
But much more important is updates in the
magnetic files and on the other website I was happy to place the
post with the modified Dirichlet kernels. So that is the update
Item 1) This update has links to two other
Item 1) This update
has links to two other updates.
A few minutes ago I updates the magnetic
files with reason number 79 as why electrons cannot be magnetic
dipoles. I found a very interesting video where people from a
nuclear fusion startup under the name Tokamak Fusion explain that
the merging to two magnetic fields leads to an extreme increase in
the temperature of the fusion plasma. That is very interesting
because one way or the other this is very very hard to explain if
the electron is a magnetic dipole.
If the electron was a magnetic dipole it
would be neutral to magnetic fields just like atomic hydrogen is
neutral to electric fields. It is very hard to communicate that to
the physics community, why this is I don't know.
Anyway, click on the picture to land at
reason number 79.
On the other website I was happy to post a
bit more on the modified Dirichlet kernels. Not that the math
community will do anything with it but ignore it, for myself
speaking it was a happy experience. Click on the picture if you
want to see that boring part of my small mathematical life known
as the modified Dirichlet kernels.
File name: Two parametrizations for 3D
Ok, that was it. Have a nice Brexit or try to
(14 Oct 2019) Correction: In the previous
update I made a stupid fault, an AU or an astronomical unit is not
150 billion but 150 million km. Ok, in this update I want to take
a short look at a part of the Nobel prize in physics and compare
that to advances in nuclear fusion, spintronics and all quantum
computers based on electron spin.
Item 1) From perfection to total misery.
Item 1) From
perfection to total misery.
Back in the year 1995 (that's 24 years ago)
two guys figured out that on a distance of about 50 light years
there was a huge planet going around a solar type star. Likely
that planet is one of those hot Jupiters because it is going round
that star every four days. Anyway that causes that star 51-Pegasi
to sway back and forwards with a maximum speed of about 50 meters
The stunning detail is that this speed of the
star gives red and blue shift and they were able to measure that
two and a half decade ago.
If you think about that, this is a stunning
technical perfection. And if you think a bit longer about that,
because this can be done it is very likely that all physics where
Dopler shift is related to is likely all correct. May be on some
details there could be something wrong or not entirely correct but
the important and basal things like the speed of light is the same
for every observes & stuff like this must be correct.
On the Sixty Symbols channel they have a good
explanation for the 2019 Nobel prize in physics, from that video
you see a screen shot of a part of the original 1995 paper that
graphs the speed of the star:
Link in the picture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gq-atYZFKPQ
Again, this is a very tiny red & blue
shift but if the basis theory is good things like this can be
done. Remark that for things like Doppler shift there is no use of
electrons except as the usual power source of all used gear.
Now compare that to fields like nuclear
fusion, spintronics and quantum computers based on electron spin.
Likely nothing of these are going to fly ever because the basic
assumption that electrons are magnetic dipoles is, in my view, not
Nuclear fusion is still a disaster, the
plasma does not behave as the theory says it should. Spintronics
is so unknown because it produces also nothing but fair is fair
for quantum computers there still is hope. But again: if the
magnetic properties of the electron are not dipole but monopole in
character, likely those quantum computers will never work properly
As an example: There are two kinds of
circular photons, left spin and right spin. If you view electrons
as magnetic monopoles, it is obvious you get two different
circular photons. But all those years I never found a good
explanation that uses the official version that electrons are
magnetic dipoles is given. It just isn't there; it is a void out
there when it comes to details like that.
Ok, let me leave it with that. Till
(06 Oct 2019) This week is Nobel prize week
so it is going to be an interesting week. Of course physics will
draw a lot of attention and for myself speaking I am curious if
the winner this year is also a staunch believer of electrons being
magnetic dipoles. Of course medicine is always interesting too
while who gives a shit about the Noble prize in literature? No
math author has ever won that prize so I can't care less...
Since it is the Nobel week of the year, why
not explain that if electrons are like this years winner thinks
so, life on earth would not be possible if that were true... The
solar wind would be very different.
Item 1) They say in the quantum world
everything is just different.
Item 1) They say in
the quantum world everything is just different.
At first when I heard all that blah blah that
the quantum world is very different, I simply shrug my shoulders.
Why would that be I asked. It turned out that electrons never
drink beer and that led me to a long long route of deep thinking.
Ok ok as a electron and you live inside the sun, it is hard to get
a beer because it is just too hot over there.
So later in life I accepted that the quantum
realm is very different, of course I kept on hoping and dreaming
that if an electron can be in two places at the same time, why not
sip two pints? And as the years passed I accepted the weird
quantum effect that electrons never drink beer...
Now serious, let's talk solar wind, the
electrons in particular. Professional physics professors (the ppp)
often state that 'electrons can only follow magnetic field lines'.
That must be one of the not true things out there that are widely
told day in day out.
Suppose the electron is still a fair distance
from the earth and has a speed of let's say 6 km/sec. If on that
distance the earth magnetic field is extremely weak, why should
the electron follow magnetic field lines? If the earth magnetic
field is extremely weak the Lorentz force is also very weak,
beside this there is also something like the law of conservation
Given the large distance of 1 AU (that's
about 150 million km) between the sun and the earth, the electron
trajectories will be more or less parallel. If it is true that
electrons can only follow magnetic field lines, at what point in
time will they do that and why? Suppose that nonsense is true and
an electron follows indeed the earth magnetic field lines, in that
case it's original speed and momentum is void and gone and all
that is left is a tiny bit of speed that is pointing upwards to
the north pole or a tiny bit of speed downwards towards the south
pole of the earth.
If it is true that an electron is a magnetic
dipole, in that case it cannot be accelerated by magnetic fields
in any meaningful way. So how come we have the aurora's? Very slow
moving electrons are rather bad at ionizing the air but for
centuries it is a fact of life that the aurora's are there and
present day understanding is ionization.
Below you see the ionization (the picture is
from Getty images):
But if electrons are not significantly
accelerated by the earth magnetic field, why do they ionize the
If my version of electron spin carries more
truth, in that case a long distance from the earth the earth
magnetic field starts separating the electrons in their monopole
magnetic states. And all the time they get accelerated and that
likely explains the ionization...
Ok, let me leave it with that. Have a nice
week and let's observe if the winners of the physics Nobel prize
this weeks are full blown believers in the blah blah of official
(26 Sept 2019) It is about time to post a new
update, it is not that I have done nothing but lately I picked up
some old hobbies again and I have been wasting time with that.
Also I managed to read zero news on a lot of days, yes there were
even a few days with zero internet access at all.
It is highly refreshing and it is good for
your mood because there is always so much stupid and annoying new
out there. For example I almost never read news any more if it is
related to the USA because I just don't want to know how Shithole
One (that's donald trump) this makes it to the news.
But I found a perfect video, only 25 minutes
long (so I hope that falls within your attention span) about
weight loss and all the hormones involved.
Item 1) A good video on hormones and obesity.
Item 1) A good video
on hormones and obesity.
The food industry combined with the diverse
academia is going on with the nonsense of you must eat carbs
otherwise your glucose householding in your body gets disturbed.
But instead of quoting the official nonsense from university
people (like in this shitty
article from the Dutch AD, the article is in Dutch by the way)
Here is the youtbe video, Dr. Lucy Burns - 'The Hormonal Approach To Treating
Obesity'. Link, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlprNSkEcdo
Here are a few screen shots from the video,
the first one shows you a bit what stuff insulin does. Like said
before, insulin is the hormone that takes care of dangerously high
blood sugar levels and it ensures all fat burning stops.
Below you se so called Kraft patterns, only
the blue line is healthy. If you become fatter and fatter insulin
works worse and worse. That is known as insulin resistance, the
body compensates with higher and higher levels of insulin and as a
result you can´t burn fat 24 hours a day. That is the main driver
in the obesity epidemic.
In the next small screen shot you see the
extreme difference between a fasting insulin level and after
All in all weight loss is achievable if you are
willing to skip all of most of those addictive carb foods. If you
don´t do that you will only do the so called jo jo thing and
swing back to your old weight.
Ok, that was it. Till updates.
(04 Sept 2019) I more or less reserve this
space on this website for funny political news like the fact the
UK Boris Johnson government has lost it' s majority yesterday.
That is funny news in the ongoing saga of how to leave the EU with
all that Brexit stuff going around.
So I do not talk about magnetism very much
around here, yet today I updated the reasons as why an electron
cannot be a magnetic dipole. This time it is more or less an open
problem and it' s name is Reason number 77.
Item 1) Electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles:
Reason number 77.
Item 1) Electrons
cannot be magnetic dipoles: Reason number 77.
This year in order to avoid wasting too much
time, I decided to post only one reason a month as why electrons
cannot be magnetic dipoles.
After all after thinking about five + years
on this subject, not much is happening in the universe of
academics. It after five years nothing has happened, likely in the
next five years this will be the same.
In practice this means that in the year 2024
the physics professors will still explain the world of electrons
via them being magnetic dipoles.
So while we are still in the year 2019, why
waste too much time on people like that? That is not a wise
placement of that precious commodity known as time.
But I am still updating the magnetic pages
because contrary to the university professors, I still have some
honor left. It is only minimal, at most once a month & that' s
For the month of September I selected an open
problem that I do not understand completely. What exactly happens
at the Curie temperature?
Click on the next picture to land at reason
number 77 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles:
That was it for this boring update. Till
(27 Aug 2019) Last week I came across a very
stupid news article that explains that eating bread is no problem
at all and the only reason you get fat or are too fat is that you
eat too much... At first I decided to completely neglect it, you
cannot react to all nonsense out there. But the stupid advice was
given by 'diet experts', that is a profession here in my country
that help people losing weight. So a few days later I decided to
pick this nonsense up because it is just as stupid a math
professors talking about complex numbers or physics professors
talking about electron spin. It is bs.
Item 1) Can you loose weight while keep on
Item 1) Can you loose weight
while keep on eating bread?
We go back to the year 2005 and with my
children we go on a bicycle holiday through Germany. About 2.5
weeks and since I had gained a few kilo's I decided to try and
loose some pounds of fat. The basic idea was very simple: I only
eat two slices of bread every morning and nothing during the day
and in the evening I eat normal again.
It was hard, it was no fun but I just guessed
it had to be this way. After all I did know nothing of food and
only thought that consuming less calories is the only way to shed
the pounds off. Anyway after two+ weeks of suffering we were back
home and I weighed my body and to my frustration I had lost only
So I simply gave up; if I wanted to loose 10
to 12 kilo that would be a long time of suffering. I caved in, I
gave up and returned to eating more without any regards. In the
year 2011 I hit the mark of 109 kilo and it dawned on me I really
had to do something...
I started to study as why so many people are
so fat and how this process of getting fatter and fatter actually
works. The first eye opener was when I came across that medical
doctor that claimed that after eating bread all fat burning stops
for a long time until your insulin levels are low enough. I really
had a WTF is this kind of moment, but indeed your body is
not a machine that works like an equation calories in = calories
out. That stupid equation says you will always loose fat if you
just eat less calories.
No, if you eat too much of the wrong foods
like bread, pasta, rice, potatoes, sweet beverages & so on,
your insulin levels are too high for too long and you can never
burn body fat. On the contrary, your body wants to get rid of all
that sugar stuff because high blood sugar levels are unhealthy and
that is the simple to understand task of the hormone insulin.
(That is a simplification because that is only one of the tasks of
insulin, but anyway let's keep it simple.)
So in the year 2011 I started to do the
simple things like more exercise and less calories eating. And
less and less carbs, I lost more and more weight until I was 88
kilo. Hey shit, that was not my goal because my goal was 80 kilo.
But even if I bicycled 500 km a week, my body just refused to go
below 88 kg.
I also started eating some health product of
Unilever for baking, they advertised it as having 3 times the
amount of omega fats compared to olive oil. No idea why I fell for
that marketing scam because that baking product contains taste
enhancers. So it is not food but an industrial product. Anyway
because of the taste enhancers I developed a gluten allergy in
about 2 months time...
Let me spare you all the details but I had to
give up all things with wheat in it, at first I was rather angry
at Unilever; why make such a fucking stupid product at all? But
stopping all wheat stuff was remarkable good for my body. And I
started to loose weight again, what before was a serious barrier
or the so called 'plateau effect' simply wasn't there
All in all I developed a way of eating that
simply avoids insulin rising too much. In this regard it is handy
to look up the foods in a glycemic index (like this
one from the university of Sidney). Only later I found out
that this style of eating is very similar to the keto diet. A
thing most people not take into account that a temporary diet
never works, you got fat by eating the wrong composition of food
in the first place. So a temporary change and going back to your
old ways will always fail.
I am under the impression that if you age,
your raised insulin levels decline slower and slower. For example
that means that for example you are in your twenties and you eat
two slices of bread with jam. May be after 3 hours your insulin
levels are low enough to get the fat burning on again. But if you
are 40 or 50 years of age this might easily take twice as much
time. So you never go to burning fat and you only feel hungry and
start eating again while your body cannot tap into that huge fat
storage it has...
I am sorry the stupid news article is in the
Dutch language. But I am pretty confident that if you live in
another country you will find similar stupid stuff. Cutting
calories is nonsense. For example is your car getting fatter
because it guzzles up too much gasoline at the local gasoline
pump? No, a car is a machine while fat storage & burning is
mostly driven by hormones.
For the Dutch: click on the picture to land
at the Algemeen Dagblad rand debiel artikel:
A few words in Dutch because it is in the
Al die achterlijke dietistes die rand debiel
voedsel advies geven moeten toch echt eens zo'n glycemic index
bekijken. Brood kan echt niet voor mensen met insuline resistentie
oftewel zij die diabetes type 2 hebben.
Ach nu we toch in het Nederlands aan het
lullen zijn: hoe komt het dat er elke dag 164 nieuwe diabetes type
2 mensen bijkomen in Nederland? Nou dat komt omdat al die
achterlijke dietistes brood blijven promoten terwijl zulk advies
de problemen niet oplost. Hier is nog een grappig artikel uit
Hoe het komt dat er elke dag 164 nieuwe diabetespatiënten bij komen
Ok, let's leave it with that stupid nonsense.
(13 Aug 2019) The global cycling network had
a nice video out where they ponder if for professional cyclist it
makes sense to go on the keto diet.
The video title is: Are Ketogenic Diets Better For Cycling Weight Loss?
And, in my view, the answer is yes. The keto
diet is more or less the only way of eating that ensures your
insulin levels stay low and only if insulin levels are low enough
your body fat will burn.
Item 1) Keto for cyclists?
Item 1) Keto for
All in all the video contains not much
faults, but it is clearly made by people who consume a lot of
carbohydrates. Professional cyclists like those Tour de France
professional riders eat about 80 gram of carbs every hour while
Compare that to at most 50 gram a day for a strict
keto way of eating...
When it comes to weight loss, of course you
should skip carbs as much as possible but for a professional
bicycle rider I think you should only do that during times where
you don't have nasty races like the Tour the France.
Evolution has given us humans a body that has
about 2000 Cal of glycogen, but there is no mechanism to steer the
glycogen around in your body when you need it. The glycogen stored
in your muscles are there for a fast burst of energy when you need
The fat storage is at least 100 thousand Cal,
but if you eat carbs you cannot use that large vault of stored
calories because carbs quicly break down to glucose and too high
glucose levels in your blood are poisonous. As such insulin levels
rise to remove the glucose from the blood and all fat burning
When you are young, insulin levels can
decline faster compared to when you get older. So young people can
turn into fat burning while racing but we all know of the infamous
'hunger blast'. If those guys forget to eat for a few hours, all
of a sudden they are out of energy and it's too late to eat a bit
of carbs. They have to eat all of the time otherwise disaster strikes...
Let me keep this update short: At 6.50 in the
video the presentator claims you need about 20% more oxygen to
burn fat compared to the glucose from the carbs. I don't know if
that is true or not but your body makes far less CO2 and CO2 is
often the reason you are 'out of breath'. Being out of breath is
often not a lack of oxygen intake but a desperate attempt of your
body to get rid of the CO2.
But let me not put salt on snails, it is a
good thing professional cyclist are starting to think about the
stuff they eat. In the next picture that is a screen shot from the
video you see how keto food is often presented: lots of meat for
no reason at all.
It clearly lacks enough salad & if you want to view the GCN
video you have to click on the picture:
So the professional sports folks can think a
bit about the next: If glucose was such an important energy source
for your body, why the hell can your body not shove around the
End of this update. See ya around.
(04 Aug 2019) It is now less then 100 days
away & as we are told Brexit is now going to happen. With or
without a deal, it's going to happen. Ok Boris & friends,
bring it on...
For me it is important that the UK crashes
out without a deal because that is what I predicted last year (in
Oct or so). The new UK government says a new deal can be made
without the undemocratic backstop. That is hard to swallow, we
need a border simply because there will be a border needed just
like in the rest of Europe with outside Europe.
Don't forget the British themselves came up
with the backstop as a way to solve the border issue, that is how
the stuff got into it in the first place. And now it is
And on the scale of things, we in Europe now need to protect the
internal market because our economical interests in that outweigh
the economical ties with the UK.
So I do not think there will be 'flexibility'
and other weird stuff; the UK is going out and as such there will
be a border. Please come with a workable solution and not only
words like 'A technical solution is possible'. Come on: automating
all border trade within 100 days is nonsense of course. Why should
we waste time on that?
Item 1) What do you think of Boris Johnson?
Item 1) What do you
think of Boris Johnson?
Boris is often compared to donald trump, I
think that goes too far because it is clear for years trump is
mentally ill (I think you can find that in a medical scan, his
brain just does not work properly) while Boris is by far not that
It has to be remarked however that Boris also
has a history of making stuff up. I do not know if it is true but
the story goes that on his job as a journalist he made up stuff
that people allegedly had said. For example: Boris Johnson said he
likes the ladies ass to mouth all evening long.
That is not true, I just made it up. But as a
journalist you do that, you get fired.
In my view Boris is much more advanced
compared to donald trump, but being advanced is not what we need.
We need a person as the UK pm that has a clear view on political
reality. And I think that is lacking, too much blah blah blah made
up on the spot and not carefully thought trough.
Source of the picture used: UK throws down gauntlet to EU over Brexit.
Ok, let me leave it with that. Have a nice no
deal Brexit please (otherwise I would look like a fool, an idiot,
a guy standing next to reality, his electron stuff is also so
bizarre & so on and so on). Till updates my dear reader.
(28 July 2019) This update upon Alzheimer is
in Dutch because it was a Dutch news article that in my view 'is
stupid enough' to make some comments upon. Back in 2005 somebody
found out that Alzheimer in laboratory mice always had insulin
resistance in the brain. If the brain of a mouse or a human has
indeed insulin resistance that means the insulin does not work any
more and as such the brain cells cannot take up glucose for use as
an energy source.
So what happens if a person with insulin
resistance in the brain eat carbs (or drinks Coca Cola)? Very
simple: insulin levels rise while all fat burning stops and as
such it is guaranteed the brain will go on with a lack of energy
for many hours after such stupid food is consumed...
Item 1) Vader Ron heeft het, zoon Niels
Item 1) Vader Ron
heeft het, zoon Niels onderzoekt het...
Het AD heeft een 'voldoende stom' artikel om
even op te reageren. Hier is een link:
Vader Ron heeft
het, zoon Niels onderzoekt het: ‘de waardeloze ziekte’ Alzheimer
Ok, stel dat Alzheimer oa als oorzaak een
energie probleem heeft; de mensen weten niet dat hun hersenen
reistent zijn tegen insuline (de insuline werkt niet meer) maar ze
blijven maar koolhydraten eten want dat geeft kortstondig altijd
een beetje energie.
Misschien ken jij zo'n type wel: ze doen een
extra schep suiker in de koffie om 'wat energie' te krijgen. Als
je dat doet ben je 'carb addicted' en als je dat jaar in jaar uit
blijft doen dan ga je er simpelweg aan.
Je hebt helemaal geen koolhydraten in je
dieet nodig; omdat glucose zo belangrijk is voor je lichaam (je
rode bloed cellen hebben het nodig en inderdaad je hersenen ook)
maakt je lichaam dit vanzelf wel. Glucose is een fucking simpel
molekuul, het is niet als één of andere vitamine het is fucking
simpel en je lever kan er plenty van maken.
Maar in onze cultuur is het normaal om de
hele dag maar koolhydraten te consumeren, je mag vooral het
ontbijt niet overslaan want dat is de belangrijkste maaltijd van
de dag. En je moet toch echt drie maaltijden nemen want anders ga
je teveel snacken....
Alleen een koolhydraat verslaafde kan met dat
soort van onzin aankomen: net als bij heroine moeten koolhydraat
verslaafden minstens elke zes uur wat eten. Omdat er niet of
nouwelijks vetverbranding mogelijk is, is na een uur of zes de
energie voorraad wel op.
Als koolhydraten echt zo belangrijk zijn voor
je lichaam, dan zouden al die miljoenen jaren van evolutie er wel
voor gezorgd hebben dat je glucose beter kan opslaan. Maar dat is
helemaal niet het geval: je lever maakt glycogeen van al dat
suiker in je bloed en dat gaat oa naar de spieren maar er is geen
enkel transport mechanisme van glucogeen als je het ergens nodig
Dus als je een glycogeen tekort in je
beenspieren hebt dan is er niets dat extra glycogeen naar die
spieren brengt. Dus evolutie zegt helemaal niet dat al dat
koolhydraten voer zo belangrijk is.
Ok, laat me een beetje citiren uit het
achterlijke AD artikel. Vader Ron is dol op room broodjes en heeft
een verzamel woede met Coca Cola. Zoon Niels staat erbij, kijkt
erna en denkt van 'Waar gaat dit over?'
Nou Niels, het gaat over het feit dat
insuline resistentie in het brein ook bij slanke mensen kan want
dan hebben ze gewoon geen insuline resistentie in de rest van hum
lichaam En in het algemeen hebben mensen altijd veel voorraad van
het spul waar ze verslaafd aan zijn.
Zijn vader heeft trek in roombroodjes. Die obsessie duurt nu al een paar dagen. De teleurstelling begon toen Albert Heijn de broodjes niet in de schappen had liggen. Daarna werd het management gebeld, maar dat antwoord beviel hem niet. Hoezo waren de roombroodjes
Of het leidt tot dwangmatig
gedrag: zoals bij zijn vader Ron (74), die behalve roombroodjes
ook cola hamstert. ,,De hele voorraadkast staat inmiddels vol. Ik
kan het medisch verklaren, maar soms denk ik: waar gaat dit over?
Waarom is dit belangrijk?’’
Kommentaar: Dit is belangrijk omdat een
verslaafde altijd grote angst heeft om met een tekort te zitten.
Hoe meer voorraad hoe beter.
Laat ik het hier maar bij houden: Al dat
soort van onderzoek met geld van de medicijnen industrie zal nooit
echt goed werken als Alzheimer vrij fundamenteel een energie
probleem is van de hersenen.
Tot opdatums mijn geachte lezer, till
(22 July 2019) Oh oh, have you seen that
video clip of Boris Johnson holding up a kipper (some kind of
fish) and Boris begins lamentating that due to EU regulations this
food cannot be delivered via the post but it has to be accompanied
with a plastic bag of ice.
Anyway it turns out this is not EU regulation
at all but just internal UK stuff. So WTF is happening here?
Either Boris Johnson is to stupid to differentiate between pure
local laws and those induced by being a EU member or, a bit
disturbing, he has more or less the same mental illness that
donald trump has. As we know donald trump often makes stuff up on
the place where he stands, if one day later he needs a 180 degree
different position that is no problem. And on the next day donald
claims all kinds of weird stuff perpendicular to what he
previously made up, why is that a problem? We just blah blah on
and tomorrow is another day.
Hard to say what is going on with the brain
of Boris Johnson, is it just being a bit sloppy, is he as dumb as
the arse of Miss Piggy or does he more or less has the same kind
of mental issues as the US prez? Well I guess we have to wait
another day before a better estimation can be made. But if he has
the 'just make it up syndrome' this is not good for future
relations with the UK.
But I don't want to talk politics because I
waited over two years before I can publish the next item on the
failure of Lockheed Martin to make nuclear fusion reactors.
It is time to harvest & no silly
Item 1) How does Lockheed Martin her fusion
Item 1) How does
Lockheed Martin her fusion reactors go?
A few years back I came to the realization
that if electrons carry magnetic charge, in that case all present
nuclear fusion reactors will fail. Simply because the electrons
will get much acceleration along the magnetic field lines and that
will give rise to a ton of turbulence because the electrons depended
on their magnetic charge will go left or right along the nuclear
fusion chamber. (Left or right when viewed from above or
If remember it correctly, it was about two
years back I more or less predicted that all those Lockheed Martin
efforts will lead to just nothing. And those guys (it is often the
guys that do the bluffing) predicted they could have mobile
nuclear fusion reactors by the year 2019.
Of course that would not happen I just
thought back in the year 2017. So am I right or not? Well it is
now the year 2019 and what do the Lockheed guys have to show up?
Until now 0%.
This is how the Lockheed Martin dreams looked
about six years ago, if you click on the picture you get one of
those Lockheed Martin propaganda video's:
It is a pity I can't find back that video
from a CEO kind of guy stating fusion plasma was diamagnetic and
all those flaws in the tokamak design were related to the magnetic
field becoming weaker in the neighborhood of the vessel
At Lockheed Martin, now we have all this new
technology, the magnetic field becomes much stronger at the vessel
wall of the fusion reactor.
And more of that blah blah blah.
Never forget that from my side of the story
told, where electrons carry magnetic charge and as such are the
long sought magnetic monopoles, I need more time to see all those
project fail. And fail and fail once more.
In the meantime the university physics
professors will keep on eating out of their noses, do a lot of
naval staring & that's life.
Till updates. my dear reader.
(12 July 2019) Back in the time, about 20
years back while going with the train to the nice city of Utrecht,
I made a few simple calculations that gave the probabilities of
the so called Benford law.
I never worked on it again (as far as I
remember anyway) but last week in the preprint archive I made a
search for Benford's law and there were only three hits. Upon
opening the first hit to my surprise I found some retired Japanese
professor claiming that there was no distribution that gave the
Benford law predictions precisely.
So that is our item of today.
Item 1) Are Japanese math professors crazy?
Item 1) Are Japanese
math professors crazy?
No idea what Benford's law is? Now in nature
there are all kinds of numbers to be found and if you pick at
random a few thousand of them, the leading digit in those numbers
more often start with a 1 and only few start with a 9.
Most people think that the probability for
any leading digit should be the same, namely 1/9 just like the 1/6
in throwing a dice. But that is not the case.
Anyway it is very easy to make a distribution
that mimics the Benford law in great detail, to be precise: in all
If you know a bit about random variable it
goes as next:
Let X have the uniform distribution on the half open interval [0,
Let Y = 10^X so that $Y$ takes values in the half open interval
It is now easy to calculate the probability
of a leading digit in Y of say 6.
Or that the first five digits of Y are the first five digits of
the number pi.
You can think of those values as taken on by
Y as the digits when we write numbers in the so called scientific
notation. In a science like physics they do that all of the
Ok ok, you must know a bit of calculating
with probability distributions. But all in all the next
calculations are not from the top of the high mountains in math.
It is all rather basic.
If you click on the picture you will land at
the article of the Japanese math professor that claims that:
Although there are many continuous
classical distributions, to the author’s knowledge, none of them gives the
Benford’s law exactly.
So enjoy the calculation and if you don't pop
open a fresh beer or drink some green tea or go for a walk or
finally clean your refrigerator or say sorry to your cat for
ignoring her emotions...
Link in the picture: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.02031.pdf
Sorry that for some readers all that math is
just a stupid update. But that Japanese math professionals cannot
do better as this is utterly weird to me.
See you in the next update.
(01 July 2019) Oh oh, donald trump visiting
North Korea? It is not a big secret I am not a big fan of donald
trump because I think he is more or less mentally ill but it looks
like the tensions with the NK are a bit fading lately. Any
mentally normal US president would never visit North Korea so it
looks like a case where a weirdo can do stuff no other president
is capable of...
May be in five years after the NK fired her
first nuclear bomb I will regret writing the above words, but
anyway all ways of lowering the tensions over there is
But this update is not upon politics, I came
across the weird information that the NAVY seals are going keto.
This is at first strange to observe: Americans avoiding eating
sugary stuff and carbs? That is like China declaring that a multi
party system embedded in democracy is the best way
Item 1) Less CO2 production in your body, yes
I can confirm that too.
Item 1) Less CO2
production in your body, yes I can confirm that too.
It has indeed dawned on me that the last
years I am never ever out of breath. In the human body if you
exercise you produce more CO2 and that is the main factor driving
for taking deeper breaths and more frequent breaths.
But the last years after changing my food
intake I can confirm that indeed you produce a lot less CO2 if you
avoid all that sugary stuff. I always blamed my age for that, I am
now 55 years and your cruising speed on a bicycle goes down. In my
country there are not that many mountains and the only elevations
you meet on your bicycle are bridges or passovers over car roads
and indeed: I never ever run out of breath or do observe a
significant need for breathing deeper.
The NAVY seals seem to study this because if
you produce a lot less CO2 you can hold your breath a lot longer
while under water. At first you think it is strange that ketone
bodies produce less CO2 compared to the same amount of energy your
body retrieves from glucose, but when it comes to CO2 production
of your own body I can confirm it is true.
I also remember when 30 kg back I was fat, if
you climb the stairs you start to breath heavily. All that stuff
is gone, so it must be true.
Click on the picture for the short
Vid link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gagAFOfxgHs
Ok, let me leave it with that. Till
(23 June 2019) After about five years some
progress has been observed in the MH17 dossier. The downing of
flight MH17 over the Ukraine was a sad thing but from day one I
simply have been thinking that it makes much more logic if the BUK
missiles were fired by a non-Ukrainian. After all if you have been
born in that part of the Ukraine you would more or less know that
there are civil planes in the sky because basically everyday when
you look up you see them flying...
Item 1) No no Putin, I still do not buy that
Russian bullshit version...
Item 1) No no Putin,
I still do not buy that Russian bullshit version...
For me it is still hard to swallow that there
was no military support from Russia to the Ukraine rebels and that
the applied BUK surface to air missile system was just some local
Again Putin, my dear shithead, if you live
there you see the civilian planes fly overhead day in day out year
in year out. Furthermore I still regard the downing of MH17 as an
accident but my main point has always been that it is very much
more likely a stranger made the wrong interpretation. To soon some
radar info led to the wrong conclusion and as such a civil plane
Anyway, now we are a few years further down
the timeline we observe that over time the economical sanctions
really have hurt Russia. So from a strategically point of view we
should push for a few decades of economical sanctions and hope
lot's of other countries will do the same...
Let me end with a small quote (it is in
Dutch, sorry), source
Soerkov is in gesprek met voormalig separatistenleider Aleksandr Borodaj. Het gesprek is volgens het JIT opgenomen op de vrijdag voordat vlucht MH17 op 17 juli 2014 uit de lucht werd geschoten. Het zag er in die periode beroerd uit voor de separatisten, die in Oost-Oekraïne de Volksrepubliek Donetsk hadden uitgeroepen. Ze waren omsingeld door Oekraïense troepen, die het gebied wilden heroveren. Borodaj en zijn legerstaf belden verschillende keren met Rusland om met spoed militaire steun te krijgen.
Eerder vandaag noemde Borodaj het opgenomen telefoongesprek nep. ,,Er kan hier geen enkele sprake zijn van authenticiteit, de opname is niet echt. Zoiets heeft nooit plaatsgevonden, het is nep”, zei hij tegenover het Russische persbureau Interfax.
Comment: So taped conversations are 'fake'...
Well sometimes I have raised doubt about how smart the local law
enforcement is (they tapped my phoneline for years too while it
was clear only an idiot would do that) but my dear Dutch law
enforcement folks would not fake such stuff. Suggesting such
simple minded stuff makes me say: please a few more decades of
economical sanctions against the Russian state.
Here you see a reconstruction of the shot
down parts of flight MH17, hey Putin is this a fake too? We never
collected the debris in the Ukraine and we just glued a bit of
stuff together and drink some Vodka later?
Ok, that was it. Don't forget about the
economical sanctions thing & thanks for your attention. Till
(15 June 2019) I cleaned up this homepage
because it became too long and as usual my dear homepage when I
cut you in half once more, that was is cut off is placed in the
archive stuff. This time it is index12.htm
as you can also find in the archive
This update is only about my tiny ego
feelings, so if you have a serious life better go do something
else. But it is funny anyway, a few days back I almost fell asleep
deep in the night and I made one little stupid picture search on
the bing search engine.
And it was like veni vidi vici, a total
victory for the 3D complex numbers!!!!!
By the way, do you also HATE people that USE
CAPS all of the TIME for NO reason AT ALL!!! while using far to
many exclamation!!! MARKS!!!!!
But when I look in the normal search of the
bing search machine, my new website is just nowhere to be found.
That is so weird that I decided to make a screen shot of it, so
that is our item for today's update.
Item 1) 3D complex numbers search on the bing
search machine, veni vidi vici?????
Item 1) 3D complex
numbers search on the bing search machine, veni vidi vici?????
The bing search engine is supposed to be a
more crude version of the Google thing or not? And as such bing is
a bit more crude, but if you search for stuff like the calculation
of the 7D number tau or search for that nice principle like The
Jente principle, bing actually works.
But if I search for 3D complex numbers, on
bing.com I get an nice load of my own pictures while I cannot find
my own 3dcomplexnumbers.net
on the first five pages of normal links.
Now I am not complaining because on page one
of the normal search results you also have a few results of a
picture search. And since I have a rather recognizable style of
crafting pictures, it is not hard to see that only the left one is
As you see on inspection: Six pictures of my
stuff and on nr 1 a thing not mine. If you click on the picture
you get a screenshot of the bing picture results. Ok ok, it is a
bit veni vidi vici but I decided not to make some graphic art out
What I do not understand is why there is no
normal link found in the non picture search results. After all,
with picture search results like this, why should I
End of this update.
(08 June 2019) I finished a wooden frame for
one of those posters I made lately and the result is not bad. I
had to made thinner planks from bigger ones and I should have
taken more time in the beginning in flattening everything more
out. That caused in the end a lot more work but anyway it is not
Item 1) Am I struck by the IKEA effect?
Item 1) Am I struck
by the IKEA effect?
For years I am making pieces of furniture
myself (for the locals here in Groningen: Je moet eens hout kopen
bij Dikhout, die zit aan de Osloweg in de buurt van de IKEA). It
is a nice hobby far away from all that theoretical math and the
good thing is slowly but surely your house looks a bit
If you can make stuff in your own style it is
always more rewarding compared when you have to buy stuff. In that
regard it is just like math: If you craft it yourself often it is
better compared what is on 'the market'.
Here is how it looks, the poster contains a
small part of the calculation of the circular 7D number tau. It
replaces my old notes that did hang there, the old notes were
about the calculation of the 5D number tau. But in the past when I
crafted the 5D tau I did not have that diagonalization method I
found later, so all in all the 5D tau was much harder compared to
the 7D tau...
This is how it looks, I still used some metal
things like screws but I am also considering making a few pieces
without any Western metal things so a bit more like Japanese
woodcraft where they have those beautiful joints for
One or two weeks back I came across that
video with the weird title 'The IKEA effect' and that started
like: 'You know, when you have build something yourself like an
IKEA table or something, you feel proud' and I felt a bit insulted
at the beginning.
Ok, even I feel a bit proud when I succeed
into putting an IKEA thing together but whatever IKEA thing it is,
most of the time you are finished in a few hours.
The way I make furniture takes a lot more
time, very often you make something for the first time so it will
always be imperfect and the next time it will be different, but I
try to work on a piece at least 10 minutes a day. So even if I
don't want to work on it any longer after about one week I am
still one hour further down the timeline on that piece of
For example the support structure for the
poster on the back is made of all kinds of wooden strips and it is
a whole lot of chiseling before it is done. I could also have used
a plastic sheet or something like hardboard but I hate that. Just
keep on chiseling at least 10 minutes a day and before you know it
you can put it all together.
But the video made me laugh to; You can also
argue that the professional physics professors are so proud of
their standard model with the tiny fault of electrons having
bipolar disorder that they just don't care about the bipolar
disorder of the poor electrons... ;)
Here is the funny video: Why
You Really Love That Wobbly Table
Ok, that was it. Till updates.
(03 June 2019) Yesterday it was the first hot
day of the summer, here it was about 30 degrees Celsius and it was
lovely. I was a bit afraid that after last horrible summer I would
hate hot days for the rest of my life, luckily I liked the heat so
my hatred does not last even one year.
On 01 June I posted reason number 74 as why
electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles & that is our item for
Item 1) Reason number 74; a simple
Item 1) Reason
number 74; a simple experiment.
This year I decided to post at most one
reason every month and as such reason number 74 is the reason
posted this month that sheds some light on why electrons cannot be
Last year in 2018 I figured out how magnetic
domains & domain walls in magnetic materials like iron
probably emerge: it has to be that magnetic domains are always
magnetic monopoles themselves.
And two neighboring magnetic domains must
always have opposite magnetic charge; the domain walls separate
the magnetic domains in an active way; the walls must have
surpluses of electron pairs and the spinning of these electron
pairs must be responsible for the separation of the magnetic
All in all these magnetic domains & walls
are a beautiful was to store a bit more energy into ferro magnetic
In another development, I found out that more
or less five years ago on 28
may 2014 I wrote for the first time on the impossibility that
electrons are magnetic dipoles. So this is the sixth year of my
investigations into the matter and of course the university people
do nothing day in day out year in year out.
Do you hear me utter the word shitholes? No
you don't, five years back I already understood how universities
work because back in 1992 I had decided not to try and get a phd.
Why try to work four years on a row with people that are
mathematically inferior anyway?
The same goes for physics, if there is a
clear fault like in the present case of electron spin
understanding it is almost impossible to repair that. The way
universities run does never promote quick & easy repair of
past knowledge. On the contrary, everything is pointing towards
more polishing existing knowledge and fine tuning the stuff and
that's it. Some unemployed person with too much free time on his
hands finding out that there is something wrong with electron
spin, give me a break the university perfumed princes have more
important matters on their minds...
Here is a picture of a nice experiment where
two small stacks of neodymium magnets are place in a rejecting
fashion as high as possible. The magnets still are attracted to
the iron in the axe, the attraction is bigger compared to the
At first I found this a perfect way of
explaining how the formation of magnetic domains takes place. One
day later I had to laugh very hard when I understood how the
university weirdo's would digest the results of such a simple
Nothing will change because if it not pleases
the ego of a university professor it is irrelevant. So I study
this stuff now for about five years and likely in the year 2014
once more nothing has changed and the electron will still be a
magnetic dipole as promoted by the future physics
Click on the picture to land at reason number
Ok, that was it. Till updates my dear
(30 May 2019) A lot has happened in the
last two weeks, Theresa May is stepping down as the British pm,
the Dutch king has invited donald trump for a visit to our
country, the summer is still cool and not hot like last year, I
found a crazy application of the 4D complex number determinants
but I am not sure if I am not fooling myself, European elections
came along, I made a clock after I found a 1.95 € so called
uurwerk at the local Hornbach, and so on and so on.
I cherry pick on the EU elections because in
my country (the Dutch landscape) two parties that are rather anti
Europa are the main losers in these electrons. That is our item
Item 1) Ha ha, shithead Geert Wilders PVV no
longer in EU parliament.
Item 1) Ha ha,
shithead Geert Wilders PVV no longer in EU parliament.
It seems that the PVV has won zero seats in
the European parliament, as a side note if the UK leaves the EU
they will get one seat. The political party PVV is not actual a
political party, you cannot become a member of it. The PVV has
only one member: shithead Geert Wilders.
This update is not supposed to be some
political rant or so, no it is only abut how healthy your brains
run. And the shithead Geert Wilders kept on remarking that they
have done a bad job at explaining to people as why Nexit would be
a good thing. Nexit being of course we leaving the European
You know I don't care what political views
people have, what much more matters is if the stuff involved is
carefully thought through. And since you do not need that many
brain cells in order to understand that the EU market is good for
our economy BIG TIME, we conclude that shithead Geert Wilders does
not have that tiny amount of properly working brain cells.
Oh oh, that brings back old memories. Years
ago the shithead party PVV came up with some report that for our
country to leave the EU would have great benifits. It was stupid
to the bone but now a few years later it is even more funny
because that report was written by one of those weird UK think
tanks. Just one of that weird stuff like in the USA they have so
called 'Prager university'. It is not a university at all but some
stupid think tank that promotes stuff like 'More CO2 in the air is
a good thing for plants'.
Picture source: https://www.ad.nl/politiek/pvv-en-sp-met-lege-handen~ae76090f/
Ok, that was it. As you see I am trying to
make my life as boring as possible by paying attention to shithead
Geert Wilders & once more: how many EU seats?
End of this update. Vote well and video well.
(14 May 2019) Last week I placed reason
nr 73 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles into the
magnetic pages. It is about the Goldsmit & Uhlenbach guys that
made an important contribution to quantum mechanics: Electron spin
is an intrinsic property of the electrons.
Needless to say I think otherwise and I was
that lucky to stumble upon a translation of a 1971 lecture from
Mr. Goldsmit. If you read it, it is crazy stuff. I had to read it
about three times until I stopped falling from one amazement into
I had always suspected something sloppy was
going on with that old discovery, the translation of the 1971
lecture more or less confirms that in my view.
But this update is just two posters. I always
skip many years between making posters because you need to hang
them somewhere in your house. After all why make a poster and not
print it out?
Item 1) Two boring posters about the
calculation of the 7D circular tau.
Item 1) Two boring
posters about the calculation of the 7D circular tau.
It is very seldom I print my work out because
I am bad at throwing print away a few years later. But there is a
small part in my house that finally will get some kind of math
filling with one of these posters. I think it will be the colorful
Here are the posters, if you click on the
picture you get them at 50x70 cm. If you want to print them out,
use a resolution of 96 dpi. I remember it was a great work to
write the details of the calculation of the 7D number tau; I still
like it so likely it will stand the test of time...
And a black & white version of this:
For myself speaking; the line with the first
imaginary component is for sure one of the most beautiful lines I
have ever written.
Ok, it is time to split. Till updates my dear
(05 May 2019) Why not another stupid video? A
few years back I observed the genius Leonard Susskind (he is a
genius because he more or less invented string theory without any
use of exponential circles or exponential curves) talking weird
stuff about black holes.
At present day Leonard still is as crazy as
Item 1) Modern day black hole studies.
Item 1) Modern day
black hole studies.
In short the genial insights go as
You have a bunch of entangled pairs of
You separate them while leaving them entangled.
Alica and Bob get each one particle of every pair.
They both make a black hole from those particles.
They jump into the black holes they crafted.
They meet in the middle.
I have no comment whatsoever on this genius
eruption of nonsense.
I also know that a lot of people think that I am the crazy one
with thinking that electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles. So both
Leonard and me, we live in crazyland.
The entire video is about 78 minutes long, if
you like the wisdom shown in the video a lot that means your brain
more or less works like the brain of the present day genius
Leonard Susskind. Click on the picture to view this 78 minutes of
physics genius stuff:
The Quantum Origins of Gravity by Leonard Susskind
I hope you now see I am only trying to do a
very moderate thing: trying to prove the electron is not a
magnetic dipole is more or less a modest undertaking.
Talking out of your neck about black holes is
another level of interesting behavior.
Let me not classify this kind of stupid
theoretical exercises, why don't those weird people not jump in a
black hole and see if they can meet in the middle?
(03 May 2019) It is about time for a fresh
update. The last weeks I had nothing to say so why post stuff if I
basically have nothing to say? Today we go over the most stupid
video I observed today and that is another dumb video by the
SciShow channel about the keto diet. Now I do not recommend any
kind of diet, but the way I eat resembles very much about what the
keto stuff is: keeping your insulin levels low almost all of the
Item 1) And another fatty explaining the keto
Item 1) And another
fatty explaining the keto diet...
On the Youtube SciShow channel once more they
are very stupid when it comes to food. Present day understanding
is that fat storage in the human body is regulated by at least
four hormones and the most mighty one is king insulin.
One of the more important tasks of insulin is
that when your blood sugar levels get too high, the king sets in
and increased levels of the hormone insulin ensure your body cells
take in the poisonous excess sugar from your blood and it gets
stored as fat. As a consequence all fat burning stops until
insulin levels are low enough to give the fat burning process it's
It is not only sugar, insulin also plays a
role when you consume protein. I never studied it in detail but in
your body delivering the right proteins at the right place on the
right time is a handy thing. Insulin is not the enemy, but because
it is such a mighty hormone it can mess up your body if you eat
the wrong kind of foods.
My entire life I often woke up in the middle
of the night, often after about five hours of sleep and I had a
terrible hunger. And I had a simple choice: eat something or stay
awake for the rest of the night. I simply thought everybody had
this, for me it was just normal. At present day I understand what
I did wrong; my insulin levels were elevated and that prevented my
body from burning enough fat.
In the stupid video the keto diet is once
more viewed as some eat as much meat as you can kind of weird
stuff video. The SciShow weirdo's still have to figure out that if
you eat far to much meat, the body turns the excess protein it
cannot digest in other ways into glucose. It is a stupid video so
if you are stupid too you likely will enjoy it.
Click on the picture to enjoy the SciShow
Ok, let us split and I wish you happy eating.
(16 April 2019) Oh oh my credibility is on
the line: About six months back I predicted a hard Brexit by now,
but the whole stuff is postponed again by another six months. And
I am just soo worried because if the Brits do not go out with a
hard crash, the physics professors will use that as an argument
that I have some mental thing and as such it is just so ridiculous
to study electron spin.
On the other hand I am in a good mood because
my first serious math invention or discovery was the product
integral; instead of adding all stuff up like in additive
integration with the product integral everything gets multiplied.
If memory serves I found that back in 1987, only 32 years back
(yes I am getting old).
The cute detail from back to 1987 is that I
raised the function to the power dx, like in f(x)^dx, as far as I
know in all literature I read about it, nobody did the obvious
thing and raised it to the power dx...
About 29 years later I found the first use of
raising stuff to the power dx, it was from some university based
in Malta of all places. But today there suddenly pooped up two
video's about product integration. Has my miserable life all of a
sudden a tiny glimmer of hope?
Item 1) From miserable lives and glimmers of
Item 1) From
miserable lives and glimmers of hope.
It is unbelievable but if today on my
computer you type the search 'product integral' on the Youtube
channel you get the next unbelievable screen shot:
I recognized the first video instantly as an
additive integral although the very enthusiastic Flammable Maths
guy thinks it is a product integral. No no, you have to put that
integral in the exponent and you have your desired product
The second video from Dr. Peyam is a bit more
advanced but he does not have a clue about how to differentiate
the functions involved.
Anyway it is good news, the flame guy for his
enthousiasm and the Dr. Peyam guy for the depth and broadness of
his mathematical investigations.
Wow man, 32 years of almost nothing and
within one week two video's about product integrals. That more or
less means that the entire humanity has only figured out in the
year 2050 or beyond that electrons are not magnetic dipoles.
Ok ok, since I know those product integral a
long time, here is an old pdf file under the title Ten
styles for product integration and differentiation.
Video links: Flammable Math enthusiast:
The Dr. Peyam doing what I did in my first
year of math studies:
Ok, that was it for this small update. Till
updates my dear reader.
(07 April 2019) It would be tempting to
comment on a tweet written by Brexiteer Jacob Rees Mogg where he
calls for all kinds of sabotage of the EU in case there will be a
longer extension to the breaking up of the UK & EU.
I don't know why Jacob wrote this, may be it
is an attempt to provoke EU officials, may be it serves some inner
British political goal. I don't know but the words of the child
Jacob Rees Mogg have been noticed with a little smile on my face.
This update is another cute video of Paul
Sutter, in this case he explains electron spin...
Item 1) Paul Sutter on discovery &
explanation of electron spin.
Item 1) Paul Sutter
on discovery & explanation of electron spin.
On the other website I already posted a
tongue in cheek kind of update about Paul Sutter explaining
permanent magnets. Here is a link:
And like said in the previous post on this:
Do not take it out at Paul Sutter in any way because he is just
explaining the main view inside physics how permanent magnetism is
understood. And for today's update; how electron spin is
Of course the famous Stern-Gerlach experiment
is spoken about. This video is not so riddled with faults as the
previous one on permanent magnets, but here Paul describes an
experiment where all electrons are supposed to have a spin with a
But the outcome of the SG experiment was a
split into two beams of silver ions, independent of any direction
of the electron spin.
And instead of the conclusion that electrons
do not have magnetic dipoles that are pointing in some direction,
you get the usual bunch of nonsense like in a 'mysterious fashion
this quantum information of the direction of the electron spin
disappears' and more of that blah blah blah.
Here is the video, click on the picture to
Youtube source link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TD7wL6yIegY
What is missing in the video is how the
professional physics professors explain how a magnetic dipole
electron gets accelerated: It must be a non-constant or inhomogeneous
magnetic field. That only means it is stronger or more
concentrated at the north pole while the south pole is more stretched
out and is weaker.
And because the magnetic field is
non-constant, there is a tiny difference in forces on the north
and south pole of the electron and that should explain the
That my dear reader is totally bogus.
Electron size is not well known but it is in the range of 10^-16
meter. It is impossible to achieve any acceleration via the
non-constant magnetic field, the spatial gradient needed says
gradients like 100 thousand Tesla per meter weaker or stronger.
That is why you never see a calculation
accompanying the blah blah blah of the inhomogeneous magnetic
If my version of electron magnetism is
correct, it should not matter at all if the magnetic field is
constant or not. After all if electrons carry magnetic charge,
that explains experiments like the SG experiment much better. And
you do not have to shout all of the time that quantum mechanics is
so difficult that if you think you understand it, you don't
Ok, let me leave it with that. Till
(30 March 2019) Yesterday the Brexit deal was
voted down a third time in the UK parliament. I am glad my
original insight from back when the deal was just struck still
stays alive. The insight was the deal between the EU & UK will
not pass the UK parliament because there is not a majority of
anything and that lack of majority for anything is directly
related to all that emotion that is going round.
Item 1) More stupid Brexit emotion
Item 1) More stupid
Brexit emotion observed.
Very often you come across crazy lines of
reasoning. For example there are a whole lot of Brexiteers that
easily state the next:
If we go out without a deal we don't have to
pay the 39€ billion and after that because we are such a huge
economy we will get a free trade deal with the EU.
For me it is hard to understand why people
hang on to such weird stuff. Due to all that multiyear financial
planning we have over here in Europe, a lot of things are not done
in just one single fiscal year but spread out over more years. As
such the UK has committed to the multi year stuff, so that has to
be paid. It is not upfront that 39 billion €, why should it be.
Other European nations also don't have to pay upfront because that
is why we have those multi year budgets in the first
I don't know much about legal matters, but
likely it is illegal for the UK to scrap those long standing
Anyway to try and explain to a Brexit
believer why this is nonsense you likely end up with the same
problem of explaining to a professional physics professor that
electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles, have never been magnetic
dipoles and in the future electrons will never be magnetic
Now physics professors are the so called
'scientists' but if they get emotional no logic will bring clarity
to their brains: It is emotional reasons only that the professors
will keep on doing their stuff like they want it.
Another example would be explaining to math
professors how to craft 4D complex numbers. All of a sudden nobody
is interested just like the average Brexit supporter not very much
interested in the tiny fact it is really fucking hard not to pay
your old long standing financial obligations while getting a free
deal trade later.
In this world there is never a shortage of
dumb people, they are found everywhere; from garbage collectors to
high shot university professors.
The most stupid news headline I found today
is the next weird text, it sounds very much like some 'get rich
quick scheme' or 'burn body fat fast' if you do just 'this one
The title alone is just so stupid that it brings a smile on my
Peter Bone DEMANDS ALL Brexiteers UNITE and do this ONE thing to SECURE Brexit
Oh oh, why are those Brexit people always so
stupid? How likely is it they will 'unite' or do 'just one
Go bone yourself my dear UK folks. End of
this update. Till updates.
(26 March 2019) I neglected an old hobby of
mine for too long: the US Federal deficit.
Item 1) Wow, amazing monthly US Federal
deficit observed: only $234 billion.
Item 1) Wow, amazing
monthly US Federal deficit observed: only $234 billion.
It looks like the growth of the US Federal
deficit is more or less on it's predictive path. It also wasn't
that long ago that only three times 234 billion US$, that was more
or less the entire US military budget.
It has to be remarked that February is always
a peak month when it comes to US Federal deficits. So You must not
extrapolate this to a yearly US Federal deficit of twelve times
After having said that, let me keep this post
short & only one funny link:
US budget deficit hit $234 billion in February, a new monthly record
Ok ok, I will not deny I have such a little
smile on my face.
For the time being I will deny that I am
activating the third so called 'Nightmare on WallStreet'. Is it
possible to cut the DOW in half once more?
Who knows? Till updates my dear
(13 March 2019) Oh shit my computer has
broken down further; the biggest hard disk broke and I lost a
significant part of my music files... On the other hand in 2015 I
already build a spare computer and a half year back that thing did
not fire up anymore but now it works again. I don't know why it
works again but that is a good shot into the right direction.
Although my biggest hard disk is broken,
there is amazing little damage. Ok it is no fun to loose such an
amount of music files but my back up system works very well all in
all: no critical files lost...
It is tempting to write a piece upon how to
build you own desktop computer for use at home but we also have
Brexit. Last evening the deal between the EU & UK has been
voted down a second time. The problem stays the so called back
stop and in my view this shows that a lot of Brits have an
emotional problem with the EU.
All that hysteria and zero constructive
thinking; for example why should the EU hijack North Ireland
indefinitely as such 'confiscating' North Ireland within the EU?
Item 1) Brexit as an emotional problem; why
don't they solve the border issues?
Item 1) Brexit as an
emotional problem; why don't they solve the border issues?
It is not my problem in the sense I did not
cause it, it is not caused by the EU but the Brits want no border
between North Ireland & Ireland and as such border facilities
and handling must be done in other places.
For example a bunch of containers go from the
UK via Northern Ireland to Ireland and possible the rest of
Europe. All that needs to happen is that this container is
inspected, possible tariffs paid and that it gets sealed if the
destination is Ireland or other European countries.
Such is seal is of course illegal to break in
North Ireland, only containers with a valid seal can cross the
border between the North & Southern part of Ireland.
How hard can it be?
Ok given future deviation of UK standards
& legislation the problem of smuggling things will evolve over
time. But the idea of having those border facilities along the
coast and not land inwards is not a bad idea.
But week in week out all you hear from those
British politicians that there need to be 'alternative
arrangements' or stuff like that. They never explain how they want
to do that.
So not much happens beside a lot of emotion
and only little reason behind what we observe in the news. It is
in many ways an emotional problem where the Brexeteers constantly
portrait Europe as a bad or even an evil entity.
Again: That is an emotional and irrational
view of Europe. Europe is 27 nations together and as such
everything has to be done in accordance to all kind of legal
stuff. If you hear a lot of those UK political folks, they talk
like Europe is just one person that you deal with.
And again: That kind of stuff is only
But for myself speaking I am glad my insight
from Nov last year is still standing:
Likely the UK is going to crash out without a deal...
Till updates (new updates make take some time
because I think I also need a new motherboard, but anyway). So pop
up a beer or a green tea or if you are a Brit; pour also some milk
in the tea.
(07 March 2019) Yesterday I finished reason
number 71 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles. It is based
on the result as found in a video about quantum computing, I hope
that is not confusing and the quantum computing thing can be
skipped because the video contains a perfect explanation about so
called Rabi frequency.
Item 1) Rabi freq = 0.5*Lamor freq? Compare
the two different explanations.
Item 1) Rabi freq =
0.5*Lamor freq? Compare the two different explanations.
I am glad I came upon this video, it is from
a Berkeley guy and he is very good at explaining stuff. Often when
you view video's upon physics, whether it is quantum computing or
electron spin or whatever what, very often the people explaining
the stuff are not very good at explaining.
Being a good teacher is an art in itself
because beside your own knowledge you must also have a good
insight in how your audience will react to new stuff. Luckily the
Berkeley guy (Umesh V. Vazirani is his name) is relatively good at
explaining the stuff involved.
And I finally understand what the community
of physics professors is doing with explaining Rabi frequency with
all those weird rotating magnetic fields... They use two of those
rotating fields, they rotate against each other and their super
position is the applied oscillating magnetic field.
There is only one tiny problem: They can use
only one of those magnetic fields and as such the other purely
hypothetical rotating field is just not talked about any
I have to say it is a very ingenious
explanation; in reality you apply an oscillating magnetic field,
you decompose it into two rotating magnetic fields and after that
you only use one of those rotating things while neglecting the
other for the full 100% and that is how professional physics
professors get their salary every month.
My own explanation goes via the work done by
the real applied magnetic field and if the energy transfer to the
electron can only be done by an oscillating magnetic field, I am
very pleased with a result like that:
It more or less validates that the electric
and magnetic properties of each electron are more or less equal in
strength. After all if work done by a magnetic field give photons
of half the frequency of the applied magnetic field, that means
those Rabi photons have half of the energy of the Lamor photons.
That brings a big smile to my face while on
the other hand I understand it will not make much of a difference
if I post reason 71 or reason 710:
University people will always have more
important things to do.
The next picture is almost unreadable unless
you already know what it says but if you click on it you will land
at reason number 71 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles:
Ok, it is little bit for the nerdy diehards
that like to understand a bit more about what is all happening
with spin resonance and how it emerges. Electrons only radiate
photons when they are accelerated, all that wiggle wiggle stuff
like precession of the spin is still not very convincing to me:
nothing accelerates so what explains the photon radiation
No, normal people are at best interested in
how Brexit will evolve or how good Ajax has done in beating Real
Madrid. Ok, I liked it too but does that make me a normal
That was it for this update. See you