(13 July 2018) Oh oh the NATO top this week
had the enjoyment of the wisdom of the US POS (= Piece Of Shit).
This time the brilliant insight is that neighbor Germany is a
slave to Russia because they buy gas from Russia.
Even the Kremlin thought this was a bridge
too far by stating that things like selling gas is more a way of
creating a mutual dependence and that is a better representation
On the trade war I have only one
The biggest driver behind the USA trade deficits is, in my view,
that the US economy as a whole consumes more than it produces.
Historically this could grow this way because the US$ is a little
bit overrated (that is artificially strong) because it has world
currency reserve status and therefore a lot of US companies could
indeed not keep up with the competition abroad.
Instead of innovating faster and harder, like for example Germany,
the USA went for the lazy way and sell paper like US treasuries to
That's how we got in this stuff in the first place, putting tariffs
on particular goods will not solve the problem of a US population
that has to use a dollar that is artificially too high all of the
Oh oh politics, better not think about all
those weirdo's out there lately.
This update is about a much more crazy thing
than recent politics and that is a tiny calculation into so called
BCS theory that explains super conductivity.
I post it here because it was already
discussed in the pages on magnetics a long time ago, but the
simple calculation says the whole theory is rather likely
Item 1) BCS theory, Cooper pairs and super
Item 1) BCS theory,
Cooper pairs and super conductivity.
In a nutshell BCS theory tries to explain
super conductivity via the formation of electron pairs, that
sounds 100% reasonable because in my view electron pairs are
magnetically neutral and that is an important property because it
opens much more of those ballistic channels in a super conducting
But if you zoom in on the details of the BCS
theory it is just horrible to the bone, it goes more or less like
1) One electron comes in the grid of positive
2) This attracts the positive ions that therefore pull together
creating an even stronger positive electrical field that
3) Makes it more likely for another electron to enter and that
4) Is a Cooper pair.
It is a complete bullshit theory and that can
be shown with a very simple calculation:
Originally back in the year 1911 Heike
Kamerlingh Onnes discovered that metals like mercury and lead lost
all electrical resistivity when cooled down to extreme low
temperatures. Of course it was a fascinating discovery.
About 50 years later the first 'theoretical
explanations' arrived at the scene and that is present day BCS
Let me keep the calculation short and easy to
The electron enters that lattice of positive
ions and as such it feel a force F from those ions because they
have positive electrical charge while the electron is negative.
The ions feel the same force.
Ok, lets say our lone electron makes 4
mercury atoms vibrate.
Will they vibrate a lot inside the ultracold mercury
Now the electron has a mass that is about
1830 times as small as the mass of a proton or a neutron. Mercury
is number 80 on the list of periodical elements and suppose it has
about 80 neutrons also.
Furthermore suppose our electron moves four
of those mercury atoms so that the Cooper pair can be formed.
Do the math: F = ma so the acceleration of
the electron is relatively high compared to the four mercury
nuclei. The electron must move 4 x 160 x 1830 in mercury
mass or over one million time the mass the electron
I do not think that ECB theory is a good
explanation, I think it is 100% bullshit.
The reason for writing this update is that I
viewed that video again where Noble laureate Frank Wilczek unfolds
his wisdom on superconductivity.
Now I do not want to be negative on this
Frank guy, he is mild mannered, soft spoken and at least he tries
to think a bit around. But BCS theory is plain bullshit and all
those people inside physics should calculate a bit more and do a
bit less of all that blah blah blah stuff that is going
Just one electron that resonates over one
million nuclei mass is just too stupid to talk about. But if you
give those people a salary, give them titles like professor and
stuff and suddenly all important but elementary calculations are
Such is life; human science is a social
construct one way or the other.
Here is the video that aroused my attention
once more to the explanation of super conductivity. Am I looking
at science or am I looking at pure 21-th century religion?
Youtube source video: Superconductivity: a far-reaching theory
I hope you can find a wiki for yourself if
you are interested in these details on BCS theory because I am
completely through with all that nonsense that so often lacks a
simple experimental or calculational basis....
So let me chase happiness and pop up the last
pint of the day and enjoy the fact that we humans are only monkeys
on a rock.
Till updates. (Updated on 14 July with a
video from drPhysicsA and we look at the energy stored in the
May be it is best you first watch the entire
video from drPhysicsA because that is rather refreshing after all
the talk bordering on religious talk from Frank Wilczek
as in the previous video.
Click on the picture for the video, important
detail is found at 6 min 46 seconds where drPhysicsA claims the
energy stored in the electron pair is about 10^-3 electron Volts.
I think this is very wrong, it has to be much more.
The basic idea as explained in the video is
that the super conductivity reaches it critical temperature and
above that the electron pairs are destroyed because of the high
Not only does that contradict the fact that
at present day those complicated high temperature super conductors
work at much higher temperatures but also the existence of room
temperature hydrogen molecules.
Take two hydrogen atoms, they are both
electrically neutral because the electron and the proton cancel
each other out. So two hydrogen atoms are never attracted to each
other because of electrical forces.
In my view, where electrons carry magnetic
charge, only when the two hydrogen atoms have electrons with
opposite magnetic charge, they will fuse into molecular hydrogen H2
. From the noble science of chemistry it is known that energy
stored inside hydrogen bonds like this is about 4 eV.
That is about 4000 times as much as
drPhysicsA claims that there is in the electron pair.
In my view, the opposite magnetic charges in
an electron pair are stronger compared to the repelling electrical
charge the electrons have.
Is there any kind of experimental proof for
such a bold claim?
Not that I am aware of, but there is existential
proof because if you are a human and you read this, your entire
body hangs on the strength of the electron pair. Ok ok there is
also ionic bonding but most organic matter hangs together because
of electron pairs.
Ok, that is what I had to say. Let's close
this update with the remark that likely the breakdown on super
conductivity as drPhysicsA expains it is that even the electron
pairs cannot those ballistic pathways of transport anymore.
And as such the super conductivity breaks down when it gets too
(06 July 2018) Oops, this website was offline
at least one day last weekend. But it's online again so it's fine
again; at least I did not forget to pay some bills and got offline
via that route... That always makes you feel so dumb and that is
not a state of mind that I like.
In this update I want to reflect on so called
scientific progress and in how far this is very much a social
thing (like a bunch of monkeys on a rock, that is also a social
As an example I only want to look at the
weird detail that inside mathematics 3D complex numbers are not
used at all while I skip the little fact that in physics they do
not understand electron spin as a magnetic charge. That is more
for those philosophers on physics; why is the electron a magnetic
dipole for a full century?
Item 1) Why are 3D complex numbers not used?
Item 1) Why are
3D complex numbers not used?
If you do a simple internet search on, lets
say 'why do 3D complex numbers not exist?' you get a whole lot of
If you look at the websites that answer this
question, they are all more or less of the type that you as an
average citizen can ask and answer questions.
Like for example in the next math exchange
dot stuff link:
number with three dimensions
These kind of questions get answered at such
websites feeding the interest of the general public into
scientific stuff. Often the answers are really stupid like 'Hey
dude that does not work!!!' to more advanced answers that include
stuff like the 2, 4, 8 theorem or that theorem of Fröbenius.
These theorems are very interesting because
they include a strategy that cannot work: they try to chase a 3D
complex number system where everything outside of the 0 must have
And that is a very stupid demand to begin
The theorems might be smartly crafted but it's basic demand was
impossible for 3D to start with.
Here is a link to the Fröbenius theorem:
Frobenius theorem (real division algebras)
Let's not get into the math of why this
approach is stupid because it can easily be shown that there
always will be numbers that are not zero but act like projections,
destroy dimensions and as such are not invertible.
Now what has this to do with the vague
concept of 'progress in science' aka our little 'monkey on a rock
Well on such websites serving the questions
of the general public at least you get some answer. There are also
websites for math professionals and over there the answers are
given by those math professionals that are superior to those those
who pose the questions...
On websites like that, for professionals and
by professionals, you just cannot find a question like 'Why do 3D
complex numbers not exist?'
So when you are a professional math
researcher you look smart if you do not ask such
And with that you have a probable reason as
why entire scientific communities can easily make no progress at
all for over a century on particular details like higher
dimensional number systems inside the math community or stuff like
electron spin inside the physics community.
And life, life will go on.
Why do we need scientific progress in the first place?
Let's leave it with that. Till updates.
(20 & 21 June 2018) What do you think of all those
weird reports from the USA about family separation where for
example one year old toddlers are taken from their
That's some great nation...
But this update is not about some disgusted
politics but about my decision to put a possible official article
about electron spin in the garbage bin.
Item 1) So no try at some official
Item 1) So no try at
some official publication?
No, there are only reasons against it. I just
don't feel good about it
For example on my computer system for some
strange reason pictures never get properly included in the Latex
texts. So about two years back I did put together a new computer
that could serve as a spare for when my regular computer broke
But in those two years of time I never
investigated if pictures could be properly included on the spare
computer... Also a few months back the spare computer broke down
and I haven't even looked into why it does not function any
When I read my own emotional state over all
that time, I think I am not very eager at this point in time to
try to get some stuff 'officially published'.
It is not only that it is very hard to take
the so called 'peer review' threshold, the small possibility of
taking that threshold is not my main reason of canceling all
prospects of an electron spin related article.
You must also weigh that against the outcomes of a possible
Suppose I could write that 'perfect article'
and with a bit of tunneling luck it becomes mainstream that
electron spin is not a vector but a magnetic charge, why should I
even try to write such a 'perfect article'?
Beside that a few years back I more or less
expected to have more experimental evidence or even proof by now.
But beside that old television of 12 € and that set of neodymium
magnets, I never came across any apparatus I could use.
And say for yourself, using a television of 12 € is not
something that those scientific magazines will applaud. Here is an
old photo from April 2016 that, in my view, proves that electrons
get accelerated by magnetic fields:
And then there is the problem of scientific
journal selection; what scientific publication would be best to
approach after writing some 'official publication'? I don't have a
clue because I only use internet sources like the preprint archive
& the likes.
I do not read such scientific journals and
that raises a funny but also philosophical question to mind: Why
should I try to get a publication into a scientific journal or
paper that I do not read myself?
That is not rational behavior, for my life it does not make much
No no, I am not crazy to the bone yet and it
is better that at least this decade the official position of all
university physics professors is that electrons are magnetic
dipoles. That is best for every one.
If you click on the picture below, you will
land at Reason 62 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles:
End of this update.
(02 June 2018) It has been a very lazy week
for me. After publishing the coordinate functions of the 4D
exponential curve, why not take a break?
Luckily there is all kinds of chaos to look
at; according to donald trump the operatives from the deep state
had infiltrated his campaign with a spy. Oh oh, it is going
to take a long time before the USA citizens realize that their
POTUS is mentally ill.
It is now about 500 days of looking at news and all so often
mostly on a daily basis you observe the words THIS IS NOT NORMAL.
And yes I agree, this or that donald trump
detail is not normal because the brain of donald trump does not
function properly. But if people try to say that, suddenly you are
not allowed to say that because 'you are not a mental health
expert' and most of all 'you did not investigate him'.
Come on, what we observe is easy to
understand; the donald trump guy might be a bit more intelligent
compared to the average US consumer, but he is clearly mentally
ill because he more or less believes the nonsense he is speaking.
But enough of the donald, in this update only
one item and that is a teaser picture for my latest post on the
Item 1) A teaser picture for the new baby tau
number in 4D.
Item 1) A
teaser picture for the new baby tau number in 4D.
Lately I have been studying the four
dimensional complex numbers a little bit, they are fun to write
about because a century of so called smart physics professors
never found this beautiful mathematical object.
Just like the math professors, the
mathematical horizon of physics professors is likely the
quaternions in four dimensional space.
And this while in general 4D space has been
in the interest of physics professors for over a full century. The
human brain is not made for math, it is much more an emotional
machine. The human brain needs on a daily basis all that emotion
because that makes you feel alive but it also prevents you from
cooling down and analyze the stuff on a deeper level.
To put it simple: We humans are only a bunch
of monkeys on a rock.
Ok, here is the teaser picture and if you
click on it you can find out how to craft those cute looking
It might look a bit difficult but that is
only how it looks.
The only thing that matters is the first
coordinate function, the others are just time lags of the first
one. So this is the product of two cosine functions, one with
period 4 and the other with period 8.
That's all, hope you have a tiny bit of
cognitive growth and in case you also want some emotion:
Let US pray for the day when the donald trump
problem is solved via a nine millimeter solution through his
Just like that funny Ghadaffi video, wouldn't
that be great?
Or better cool down and do a tiny bit more
End of this update.
(13 May 2018) Is the stock market going to
crash in the foreseeable future?
For this year I am not expecting this
although it has to be remarked that stock market growth as a
percentage has been a huge multiple of underlying economical
In the previous update I mentioned the so
called 'Second activation of the Nightmare on Wall Street' as was
started on 12 Nov 2007. At that point in time I had already
studied the worldwide financial system since the year 2004. So
after 3 years of study I had a good oversight upon the many
weaknesses and bubbles there were around in those long lost
My main insight into 'this is going to blast'
was mostly rooted in the fact that the US financial system
annually adjusted needed about 2.4 trillion US$ fresh debt in
order to function properly.
It was obvious there was not that much money
to satisfy that level of fresh debt...
So it just had to snap...
Item 1) What will happen with QT in the year
Item 1) What will
happen with QT in the year 2019?
Since the financial crisis from a decade ago
it has been a fact of life that the US federal deficits growth was
always above economical growth and as such tax money intake.
At the beginning 10 years ago the total US
federal debt was about 60% of the gross domestic product, at
present day it is hovering about 100% of the GDP.
QT if the fine art of the central banks to
unload some of the stuff they bought and QT stands for
'quantitative tightening' and as such the US federal reserve plans
to sell all those US federal debt they bought. I do not know the
exact numbers, say they sell about 50 billion US$ a month. That
would be about 600 billion in the year 2019...
The US federal deficit for 2019 could be as
much as one trillion, likely a bit more because donald trump is
the king of debt so that is an extra market pressure of 1000
billion US$ in fresh debt.
To top it off, there is also old US federal
debt that will mature and it has to be paid back. Of course there
are no saving funds for that so they will do the refi or the
'refinance' thing. I do not know the numbers and have no clue
about how many billions these are, but will old investors in US
debt that matures in 2019 actually buy new US debt???
So all in all the present market situation is
easy to understand:
It is totally crazy and can the central banks
really sell all the garbage they bought?
The numbers in the next picture are total US
federal debt levels in billions of US$. Of course what is still
left out is the hidden debt like in the social security funds.
Stuff that looks like some asset but is in fact debt to be sold in
a future market...
Source of the numbers: FED
Ok, let us leave all this market madness
behind and just observe how the central bankers of the USA and
Europe sell the stuff like they promised...
Till updates my dear reader.
(27 April 2018) The staying power in the news
of the pee pee tape over the last two weeks is amazing. On 14
April when I wrote the previous post I did not know it but it
seems that donald trump on three or four occasions brought the
subject of pee pee tape up with James Comey.
So that makes it much more likely that indeed
some splashing details are true, but if the tape exists we still
don't know what is upon it. It would be great if indeed we will
see the donald consuming lady pee while on hands and
Beside the fun, in this short update I would
like to try explain as why donald is mentally ill as I have been
thinking all of the time. That is our item for today:
Item 1) What explains all those weird lies
from donald trump?
Item 1) What explains
all those weird lies from donald trump?
Two strange flaws that often bedevil the
1) This giant stream of lies and
2) The absence of strategic thinking.
Just like most people I only thought donald
was some pathological liar and emotionally too unstable to have
any strategic importance.
For the rest I did not think much about it,
after all it is not my problem.
But lately the former head of the FBI James
Comey told a few times that donald trump has no morals at all. In
the brain of donald trump, all moral stuff is completely
Most morals also have a biological embedding
in the brain, if a species has some biological based morals that
can help them or hinder them. For example if cannibalism is
rampant among some animal species, this could hinder the long term
survival of that species and as such most animal species avoid
cannibalism under normal circumstances.
For example a small brain fish like a piranha,
when they attack a prey they never attack each other. Now are the
piranha embedded by God with moral values like 'thou shall not eat
thye neighbor nor the daughter of the neighbor'?
No, God has not much to do with it.
If all piranha's know they will never be attacked by their fellow
hunters, that makes them the formable attack force they
Morals in some animal species or our own
human species often make clear when you can attack a fellow member
of your species. It is well known that donald trump attacks a lot
of people often for what we consider as 'no reason at all'.
For example when donald trump strikes at
those NFL players for kneeling down on one knee during the playing
of the national anthem. Only a person with a brain that is not
properly functioning on the biological level would do that, you
must have something that is some deviation from normal brain
Now suppose the observation from James Comey
is correct and indeed donald trump is void of morals, in that case
the border line between a lie and that what is true fades away.
The brain activity of donald must be the same if he tells a lie or
when he tells the truth.
In my view, this is a deep rooted
malfunctioning of the human brain.
In other words: The US prez donald trump is mentally ill.
The words as written above should not be read
as negative stuff, or that I am in some depressed mode about the
future of humanity while we have a bag of garbage at the nuclear
button of the USA...
A few months back I came about that html page
I wrote about a decade ago.
And I smiled softly because now 10 years later it all looked so
chaotic, just like the donald has all that chaos surrounding him.
Although my html file was highly chaotic if
you read it after 10 years, it did not lack strategic thinking.
After all I had reached my goals and the DOW Jones was cut in
Here is a screen shot picture from the start
of that file, click on it to go to the old html file:
Oh oh, those good old days without donald
Need an AAA credit rating? Just buy one!
That was it for this update, thanks for your
(14 April 2018) The last days there suddenly
is a tiny bit more news of the 'pee pee tape' related to a visit
from donald trump to Moscow. As the rumor went, donald wanted a
room and had some prostitutes pee over each other...
The whole thing was secretly taped and as
such could be an explanation as why the Russians have so much sway
over donald trump.
I always considered this a bag of nonsense,
if it is true that we only see a few prostitutes peeing on each
other, why should a person like donald be embarresed?
That is our first item of this update, in the
second item a few more reasons as why electrons cannot be magnetic
Anyway here we go:
Item 1) How does donald trump get his
Item 2) A zero field splitting of electron spin?
Item 1) How does
donald trump get his potassium?
Potassium is an important element for your
body, daily enough intake via enough veggies is important because
your body cannot hold on it. You can't store potassium, you pee it
Some time back last year James Comey was
fired from his CIA post and now he has a book coming out and one
of the details seems to be that donald asked James Comey to start
an investigation into the 'pee pee tape' and the conclusion should
be that it was all not true.
When those pee pee rumors emerged for the
first time, after a few minutes of thinking about this relatively
weird news I understood what could be on the pee pee tape:
That was not donald trump ordering a few
hookers to urinate over each other, no no much more likely it was
that the present US president donald trump was on hands an knees
and actively drinking as much of the stuff as possible.
Now with the new information coming in that
donald trump wanted an 'investigation' into the pee pee tape from
Moscow, after waiting long it just looks more and more likely that
donald trump did indeed swallow a lot of urine while he was on
hands and knees...
After having said that, it is a pity that it
will likely take a few more years before the pee pee tape finally
will surface. On the positive side, if there is one pee pee tape
that is talked about, what else can there be?
Let's leave it with that.
Item 2) A zero field
splitting of electron spin?
On 7 and 9 April I posted two more reasons as
why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles.
The 7 April update is about the Majorama
fermions as found by the Dutch university of Delft (I still don't
think these particles are their own anti particle my dear Delft
The 9 April update is a bit more from the
chemical sciences; even in the absence of any applied magnetic
field there still is a difference in electron spin state.
It has a beautiful name: Zero field splitting...
Scroll down on page four of the magnetic
stuff as it is covered on this website:
The funny detail in the last reason is that
even in the absence of a magnetic field there still are two
kinds of electrons, that once more validates that electrons do
not have spin but charge, that is magnetic charge so to say...
Ok, that was it for this update. Till
(08 April 2018) It is not my task to comment
upon every stupid video out there about food and diets, but after
viewing a video riddled with nonsense from the channel Seeker I
decided to put some side notes to that stream of nonsense...
The Seeker people, let's name them Mr. and
Mrs. Stoopid come up with all those nonsense stuff like 'Your
brain runs on glucose so you need to eat carbs' while in practice
because glucose is such an important molecule for your body, your
very own body can produce plenty of glucose...
It is just all so stupid, I hope to keep it
short but here we go:
Item 1) The most stupid Seeker video ever!
Item 1) The most
stupid Seeker video ever!
In the year 2011 my body weight had grown to
109 kg and because year in year out I was only gaining weight I
decided to do something about this ever growing problem.
So at first only some calorie restriction and
more exercise and kilo by kilo the fat burned slowly away. In the
meantime I began to study the stuff around food and how it all
affects your body.
At some point in time I did hit a severe
barrier; I could not get below 88 kg of body weight. Even riding
your bicycle for 500 kilometer a week could not break down this
In the meantime all of a sudden I developed a
serious gluten allergy so I simply was forced to stop eating all
that wheat stuff. That's it in a nutshell but year in year out I
am very stable in body weight ever since.
Compared to all those diets out there, the
way I eat resembles mostly the keto diet. The keto diet is
basically very simple: keep your insulin levels low so that your
body has the capability to burn fat.
If you eat too much carbs or protein in the
form of meat, blood sugar levels rise and at that point in time
your body can't burn fat. The present day obesity epidemic is not
about people eating too much but much more the food they eat
prevents their bodies to burn fat...
After having said that, here are a few of the
very stupid things Mr. and Mrs. Stoopid explain to us as being
'scientific' or 'under strict oversight' and it is just all soo
1) Eating fat, my arteries hurt says Mr.
Comment: If you can't burn the body fat also
dietary fat can become bad for your health.
2) Glucose, your brain and body runs of
glucose says Mrs. Stoopid.
Comment: Glucose is a very simple molecule
that your body can easily make plenty plenty plenty.
3) Giants amounts of meat. For some strange
reason Mr. and Mrs. Stoopid seem to think that maintaining a low
insulin level commutes with eating gigantic amounts of meat.
Comment: If your body cannot process huge
amounts of meat, your body will respond by breaking the meat down
into sugars raising your insulin levels.
4) Starvation. Here is where Mrs. Stoopid
gets really fanatic, only via starvation and all of that ridiculous
keto stuff you can loose weight...
Comment: Eating no food by carb hoarders for
more than six hours is known as the horrible process of
'starvation'. Yes, after about six hours your glucose reserves are
depleted and because you did eat too much carbs to begin with you
feel very very starved. And you crave food deeply...
A normal person would access the body fat for
energy and would find it very strange to name this
Only carb eaters use the word starvation, if
you are behind that diaper wearing phase in your life it is simply
Here are Mr. and Mrs. Stoopid explaining
their precious insights about how to feed the brain, click on the
picture for the stupid video:
Does the Keto Diet Actually Work?
Wow man, I am glad I made it mentally sane at
the end of this update... ;)
End of this update.
(02 April 2018) Lately I found a nice video
summing up all the problems related to when you eat stuff your
body cannot digest, in particular gluten.
At present day gluten is a bit of a laughing
stock for a lot of people because they never drop dead after
consuming bread or other wheat related products. But the effects
it has on your body build up over time, the first half century of
my like I did eat bread on a daily basis and I too never thought
it would do me harm.
It was just food, I trusted it...
That is the item for this update:
Item 1) Make or buy some gluten and take
experiments for yourself.
Item 1) Make or buy
some gluten and take experiments for yourself.
Gluten is something your body just cannot
digest, gluten is not one molecule or protein but has more
components. For myself speaking I view gluten as a collection of
anti rot components that the wheat grain uses to survive the
winter in order to sprout and grow and live for another generation
So if this is true, if gluten is also an anti
rot component for the form of life known as wheat, it should also
be that almost no other form of life can break it down.
I checked that more or less abundantly in the
past. I bought a kilo of 100% gluten for just five Euro, also I
washed wheat dough out until you are left over with the gluten.
I did put out chunks of gluten in plastic bags together with some
water and, for example, some French cheese. Or with beer yeast, or
a combination of cheeses and beer yeast or even bread
At one point in time I even placed a plastic
bag in my garden, let it open so all kinds of microscopic life
could enter the plastic bag.
After that I started using fermentation
bottles because that gave such nice looking photographs where I
could make my fancy pictures from.
Anyway, all experiments I have done to make
nature break down the gluten always were at least 3 months until
the proteins were broken down so small that the stuff became a
The human body is not made for digesting
stuff over a time span of 3 months or more so we simply shit all
problematic stuff out and live happily ever after.
Ha ha ha, the funny thing about gluten is
that the daily consumption of wheat related products gives you a
leaky gut so that all kinds of garbage can get into your
But this post is not about repeating what is
already out there in knowledge about what can happen if you eat
too many stuff your body just cannot digest, think of experiments
for yourself. What form of life can break down the conglomerate of
proteins known as gluten?
You can get gluten via washing out a fresh
kneaded wheat dough, after flushing the dough with water for about
40 or 50 minutes it looks like this:
Once you have the pure gluten you can think
of yourself for all kinds of experiments showing human digestion
cannot break it down. Nor other forms of life on this planet.
The leaky gut stuff related to gluten is also
very likely very true, after I changed my diet to anti gluten I
almost had no back pain for about four years. In all years of my
bread eating life I had so much back pains that every year at
least one week I could not ride a bicycle...
And if you eat bread every day, you also have
have at least for some time every day this schematic picture for
your leaky gut problems:
Ok let's call it a day.
The two pictures above came from the next
gluten that bad for your health? | The science
It is a nice video and with a little smile on
my face I can say I have also found a group of ultra smart
professionals that should eat more gluten: The math professors!
If math professors would eat more gluten and
the rest of the population less gluten I would be in paradise...
;) Thanks for your attention.
(26 March 2018) It is about high time to post
a few new updates on this very homepage. In the previous update I
did not mention it but only posted a link to page
3 on the magnetic stuff (mostly viewing electrons as magnetic
And with a little smile on my face I type
once more down 'electrons viewed as carrying magnetic charge' and
I know that instantly all those professional physics professors
will fast click away to some other website.
These people are shitty to the bone or to put
it more mildly: they are university people...
The last few weeks I have been working on a
general proof for the so called inverse Pythagoras theorem but I
was a bit stupid and first crafted the general proof and only
later tried to look up on the internet about the inverse theorem
It turned out there is no inverse theorem of
Pythagoras, anyway I could find nothing in the public domain.
Anyway this inverse stuff is our first item and the second item is
about a very nice explanation of magnetic domains and the domain
walls of magnetic domains.
Item 1) On the other website: A general
inverse Pythagoras theorem.
Item 2) More on magnetic domain walls that are made of electron
Item 1) On the other
website: A general inverse Pythagoras theorem.
For myself speaking I would not classify this
result as a theorem but more like a cute result. But I found that
was of measuring the distance d as used in the cute result
over two decades ago.
On the other hand it was only why some other
guy named the 2D version a 'theorem' I started thinking about this
so for me this cute result is new too...
So theorem yes or no, let history decide! OH
NO: that kind of history is more or less the version of history
that future university people will make of it so may be that is
not a wise thing to desire...
Anyway, here is the link to the cute result
that for the time being goes under the name of The General Inverse
is the inverse Pythagoras theorem?
Here is a screen shot that shows the cute
That's it for this item: cute result or a
full blown theorem? Make up your own mind.
Item 2) More on magnetic
domain walls that are made of electron pairs.
At the beginning of February I watched a
video with Stuart Parkin from IBM talking about so called
racetrack memory where they use nano wires to shift the magnetic
domains inside the nano wire.
This is a way to store information on some
computing device, present day fast memory consumes far to much
energy and this racetrack concept of storing information on nano
wires is very very cute...
Stuart Parkin told that the magnetic domain
wall can only be moved by electrical fields like those inside the
nano wire done by what Stuart calls 'spin polarized electrical
current'. The important detail is that likely Stuart & his IBM
fellows have tried to manipulate the domain walls via magnetic
fields and as such they failed.
The same day I realized what must be going
1) The inside of the magnetic domains have a
surplus of electrons carrying north pole magnetic charge OR as
surplus of south pole magnetic charge on the electron.
The magnetic domains themselves are NEVER magnetic dipoles but
regions with a surplus in one of the two magnetic charges.
2) The domain walls contain much more
electron pairs because all unpaired electrons will be pulled to
some inside of the domain because they are not magnetically
neutral. The electron pair is by definition magnetically neutral
because it is always made up of a south and a north magnetic
charge and as such likes to hang out in the middle where the
Lorentz forces make it spinning around.
Basically that's it: paired electrons are
always by definition magnetically neutral while unpaired electrons
never are magnetically neutral because they carry magnetic
As such the formation and change of the walls
of magnetic domains is a highly dynamical process, unpaired
electron will tunnel into another magnetic domain if the wall is
too weak and so on and so on.
Here is reason number 57 from two days back:
video containing the formation of magnetic domains
The reader is invited to think a bit about
electrons having magnetic charge and as such explain all those
weird phenomena we see around us...
After all it is not my task to convince you
about anything electron related, if your brain is more or less
healthy you will arrive at similar insights...
(Except for the university people of course.)
End of this update.
(10 Feb 2018) Ok, I could talk long and short
about some local earthquakes but I won't.
We leave out all local emotional stuff because we also have to
clean the closet every now and then.
So this is more about the Mathologer who
finally sees the light and the IBM folks who still struggle so
much to understand the elementary basics of electron spin:
Item 1) Finally the Mathologer sees the
Item 2) Magnetic domain walls explained via electron
Item 1) Finally the
Mathologer sees the light.
Back in April 2016 after visiting a general
math lecture at the local university here I thought it would be
funny to completely debunk the nonsense from a bunch of Nottingham
physics professors who claimed that the sum of all integers equals
They sold nonsense like:
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + .... = -1/12.
And from that it is easy to deduce much more
completely retarded nonsense, for example you can lower every
integer in this sequence by one in order to get the same sum
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... minus
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ... =
0 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ...
But if the last sum also equals -1/12, it has
to be that:
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ... = 0.
If you have a normal functioning brain, I
hope you more or less estimate that if you add the number 1
infinitely many times, the answer is the thing known as
To my surprise on a video channel I found the
Mathologer also explaining why this is a bunch of weird math. It
was fun to watch so I placed a small update with his video on this
two year old detail:
Debunking the Euler evaluation of zeta at minus
Let us leave this detail behind us.
Item 2) Magnetic
domain walls explained via electron pairs.
This week I was viewing another video of
Stuart Parkin who is trying to craft so called racetrack memory
for future computers and he is trying to use the spin of electrons
in order to reach his goal.
Of course Stuart Parkin is a strong believer
in electrons having two magnetic poles, just like all the other
professional physics professors.
Let me not lamentate upon the slow acceptance
of electrons carrying a magnetic charge, that is how the human
brain works after all: slow and dumb ;)
Anyway within a few hours of looking at his
video I understood how the magnetic domains in metals like iron
are for real:
The borders as found in iron have much more
electron pairs into them, furthermore each magnetic domain has
either a surplus of north or south electrons carrying the magnetic
The electron pair is magnetically neutral
while unpaired electrons never are, so when Stuart Parkin informed
me that those magnetic domain walls just not got moved by magnetic
fields, after all that time I had a tiny bit of experimental
validation of my whole magnetic charge idea...
So this is reason number 53 as why electrons
cannot be magnetic dipoles:
Domain walls of magnetic domains explained (electron pairs).
Here is a picture of
the stuff that is most horribly wrong with the representation of
electron spin as a vector; make up your own mind but I consider
this not correct:
Ok, that was it. Till updates.
(28 Jan 2018) About three weeks back I had a court case
because back in Nov 2016 I was that stupid to park a car on the
parking spot of a handicapped person...
That was stupid of me, I cannot deny that, but I was completely
unaware of the nature of the parking spot because I did not see
Anyway I was fined a nice 390 € and because
that is a whole lot of money for something I had not done on
purpose, I decided to appeal.
So I performed all my appealing duties, it
was nice to use the old post method of letters written on paper a
few times, and that was it in let's say Dec 2016.
About half a year later I got the next letter
from the CJBI (that is the Dutch state fine collector, a rather
powerful organization) and my appeal was not taken into
consideration because I failed to handover the letter that said I
could appeal in the name of the car owner...
But I never received a letter telling me to
do so, all I observed was month after month of nothing.
So I appealed against the decision of not
taking up my first appeal and as such we had a court house date of
08 Jan 2018 at 14.00 hours.
For me it was kinda strange to be back in the
local courthouse, so much has changed like for example it is much
harder to bring explosives or metal weaponry to the courthouse...
It was nice to observe how they evolved since I have evolved
Anyway, beside all those old emotions, later
I found out that at 14.00.52 hours a multiyear long record
earthquake was there just outside the city where the gas pumps of
companies like Shell suck the natural gas from under our living
Therefore in order to promote cognitive
growth in item 1) we try to estimate the average amount of how
much the so called 'bodem daling' will be.
And since this is a local issue, it will be
done in the Dutch language. (Sorry for that.)
Item 1) Wat is eigenlijk de gemiddelde bodem
Item 1) Wat is
eigenlijk de gemiddelde bodem daling?
Een aantal jaren geleden heb ik eens proberen
te schatten hoeveel de bodem daling in Groningen nu eigenlijk gaat
De gasproductie is altijd gegeven in het
aantal miljarden kubieke meter, één miljard kubieke meter gas is
precies één kubieke kilometer. Maar 1 kubieke kilometer aan de
oppervlakte onder een druk van 1 atmosfeer (of 1 bar zo je wilt)
neemt diep in de grond veel minder ruimte in.
Nou ik wil niet de hele berekening herhalen,
maar je maakt gewoon gebruik van een nogal eenvoudige gaswet die
zegt dat druk maal volume gedeeld door de temperatuur gelijk is
aan een constante.
In al zijn eenvoud, bij veronderstelde
gelijke temperaturen, bij twee keer zoveel druk heb je half het
Dus ik ga het spul niet herhalen want dan kom
ik weer op een gemiddelde bodem daling uit van 3 tot 6 meter. Je
hoeft niet erg lang na te denken dat dit eigenlijk nogal rampzalig
is en gigantisch duur op de lange termijn...
Ik nodig jullie dus van harte uit om het zelf
eens te proberen, daarbij heb je de volgende gegevens nodig:
1) De cumulatieve aardgaswinning sinds het
begin van de gaswinning in de jaren 60, stel dat is X miljard
kubieke meter aardgas dan is dat dus X kubieke kilometer aardgas
bij een druk die we aan de oppervlakte hebben.
2) Diep in de grond is het warmer, dat laten
we gewoon weg uit de berekening omdat we een CONSERVATIEVE
SCHATTING willen maken. Er zijn namelijk ook allerlei redenen dat
de bodem daling minder zal zijn, bijv als er veel grote rotsen
zijn of hele steenlagen dan kan die bodem daling wel miljoenen
Nou er zijn eigenlijk geen rotsformaties en gegeven de hogere
temperatuur zal die X kubieke kilometer dus iets meer volume
innemen want hoe warmer het is hoe meer het gas uit zal zetten.
3) Gemiddelde diepte van het gewonnen gas,
dan kun je de druk uitrekenen. Op bijv zes kilometer diepte is de
druk gewoon het gewicht van een kolom aarde daarboven tot de
oppervlakte. Als ik het mij goed herinner gebruikte ik een massa
van 2500 kilo per kubieke meter grond. Dan kun je de zwaartekracht
uitrekenen die je per vierkante meter hebt, dat is dus 6000 maal
2500 maal de lokale gravitatie constante g = 9, 81.
4) Je moet ook de oppervlakte van de
gaswinning weten, volgens mijn geheugen is dat vrij precies 900
Als mijn schatting van 3 tot 6 meter bodem
daling correct was, dan moet al het gas dat er gewonnen is sinds
de jaren zestig diep in de grond dus ongeveer een volume hebben
900 maal 0,003 = 2,7 kubieke kilometer, tot
900 maal 0,006 = 5,4 kubieke kilometer.
Een aantal jaren terug vond ik het eigenlijk
best wel een schokken resultaat. Gelukkig hebben we ook de
universitaire wereld en die deden natuurlijk weer waar ze goed in
Dus geen validatie, geen ontkenning. Gewoon
business as usual en vooral niets doen...
Laten we het daarbij houden behalve een
geinig nieuwtje omtrent een belangrijke aandeelhouder van de NAM
die natuurlijk voor de kosten van de bodem daling zou moeten
opdraaien. Dat is Shell, die suckers beginnen zich terug te
trekken tegen de toekomstige kosten van de Groninger bodem dalind
veroorzaakt door de gaswinning van de Shell suckers themselves.
Dit is van dagblad Trouw:
Shell zet de Nam op
afstand. Wie draait er straks op voor de schade in Groningen?
En voor het geval je eens hard wilt lachen om
één van die overbetaalde ultra debielen bij Shell: De NAM heeft
poen zat voor alle schade die nog gaat komen. Dat wijf is echt
rand debiel, hier is haar overbetaalde visie:
Shell-topvrouw: NAM financieel robuust genoeg voor rekening aardbevingsschade
Waarom kopen die mensen niet een paar zakken
potaarde voor de planten vraagt de topvrouw van Shell zich af.
Daarmee kunnen ze toch makkelijk die bodem daling compenseren?
Toegevoegd op 01 februari, een leuke wiki
zegt dat op dit moment de maximale bodem daling ongeveer 30
centimeter is. En dat is maar in een niet al te groot gebied, niet
in de 900 vierkante kilometer van het totale gaswinnings gebied...
Er zijn dus al giga veel problemen en allerlei kosten bij een
maximale bodemdaling van 30 centimeter.
Als mijn gemiddelde schatting van 3 tot 6 meter uitkomt dan is het
duidelijk dat de meeste problemen nog in de toekomst liggen.
End of this update, till updates.
(10 Jan 2018) Often you hear stuff like 'Do
not use Google search but Duckduckgo because the latter protects
your privacy and for Google you are just a bunch of data'.
People sometimes say 'If you are online,
Google knows who you are'.
There might be some point into this because
with the rise of fake news, last year the echo chamber came to the
foreground meaning websites like facebook and the likes bombard
you with news and advertisements of stuff you have seen
So in this update we do only one search,
calculation of the 7D tau
and we will look at the behavior of the Bing
search from Microsoft, Duckduckgo and the elephant in the room
named Google search.
Item 1) Internet search engine comparison.
Item 1) Internet
search engine comparison.
On 06 Dec last year I posted the way to
calculate this seven dimensional important number on the other
website. Here is the post for those who are into that kind of nice
An important calculation of the 7D number tau (circular
To my surprise on all three search engines
this post popped up at number one. Some people might remark this
is rather logical since there are not that many webpages with
titles like that. Ok, that is true but there is also a lot of
noise that pops up high in the search results.
Yet, the Bing engine from Microsoft gave only
one result on the first page. Duckduckgo gave also the
introductionary post to the calculation of the 7D tau.
Here is a screen shot:
Now compare this to Google; they give also
the 06 Dec post as number one but also pages of the categories as
I use them on the other website. Categories like 'Exponential
curves' or 'Matrix representation'.
I think it goes too far to classify this as
'echo chamber', it is just better and is what Google always said
they try to do: Making searches more relevant.
For myself speaking I will mainly be using
Google as my default search engine. The fact my userdata might
have some use for Google is fine by me, after all Google gives
also goodies in return like Youtube or Google books.
Of course you must be aware of the
differences between the three main search engines, in the future
the searches stood be relevant and not what some AI guesses you
like to read.
Ok, let's hit the button 'upload changes' and
see you next time!