The writings of Reinko Venema. 


 Click the pic for the history of this main page... (The archives)

 

Archive of this home page
going back to 2005.

  

-Dring dring, there the door bell goes. Reinko opens the door and it is Arty! Hey come on in Reinko says. 

Arty: Shit man, all these years you let me dry out in the beautiful Afhganistan landscape and now I must come here to eat cookies?

-Reinko: Oh, you got the message wrong: In this country it is illegal to send so called cookies along with your website. 

But I cannot control the cookies my dear Arty, that problem is around for many years: 
Visitors get a cookie, but it is not done by  me... .

Arty (looking difficult): So what do we need to do?

-Reinko: We must eat the cookies before they eat us..

 Arty (smiling): Ok ok, I have to go back to my home country, so bye bye 

 

recen

     

(08 June 2019) I finished a wooden frame for one of those posters I made lately and the result is not bad. I had to made thinner planks from bigger ones and I should have taken more time in the beginning in flattening everything more out. That caused in the end a lot more work but anyway it is not finished. 

Item 1) Am I struck by the IKEA effect?

  Item 1) Am I struck by the IKEA effect?

For years I am making pieces of furniture myself (for the locals here in Groningen: Je moet eens hout kopen bij Dikhout, die zit aan de Osloweg in de buurt van de IKEA). It is a nice hobby far away from all that theoretical math and the good thing is slowly but surely your house looks a bit nicer. 

If you can make stuff in your own style it is always more rewarding compared when you have to buy stuff. In that regard it is just like math: If you craft it yourself often it is better compared what is on 'the market'.  

Here is how it looks, the poster contains a small part of the calculation of the circular 7D number tau. It replaces my old notes that did hang there, the old notes were about the calculation of the 5D number tau. But in the past when I crafted the 5D tau I did not have that diagonalization method I found later, so all in all the 5D tau was much harder compared to the 7D tau... 

This is how it looks, I still used some metal things like screws but I am also considering making a few pieces without any Western metal things so a bit more like Japanese woodcraft where they have those beautiful joints for wood.  

 

One or two weeks back I came across that video with the weird title 'The IKEA effect' and that started like: 'You know, when you have build something yourself like an IKEA table or something, you feel proud' and I felt a bit insulted at the beginning. 

Ok, even I feel a bit proud when I succeed into putting an IKEA thing together but whatever IKEA thing it is, most of the time you are finished in a few hours. 

The way I make furniture takes a lot more time, very often you make something for the first time so it will always be imperfect and the next time it will be different, but I try to work on a piece at least 10 minutes a day. So even if I don't want to work on it any longer after about one week I am still one hour further down the timeline on that piece of furniture. 

For example the support structure for the poster on the back is made of all kinds of wooden strips and it is a whole lot of chiseling before it is done. I could also have used a plastic sheet or something like hardboard but I hate that. Just keep on chiseling at least 10 minutes a day and before you know it you can put it all together.  

But the video made me laugh to; You can also argue that the professional physics professors are so proud of their standard model with the tiny fault of electrons having bipolar disorder that they just don't care about the bipolar disorder of the poor electrons... ;) 

Here is the funny video: Why You Really Love That Wobbly Table 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwBH409PhL4 

Ok, that was it. Till updates. 

 

(03 June 2019) Yesterday it was the first hot day of the summer, here it was about 30 degrees Celsius and it was lovely. I was a bit afraid that after last horrible summer I would hate hot days for the rest of my life, luckily I liked the heat so my hatred does not last even one year.

On 01 June I posted reason number 74 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles & that is our item for today: 

Item 1) Reason number 74; a simple experiment.

  Item 1) Reason number 74; a simple experiment.

This year I decided to post at most one reason every month and as such reason number 74 is the reason posted this month that sheds some light on why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles. 

Last year in 2018 I figured out how magnetic domains & domain walls in magnetic materials like iron probably emerge: it has to be that magnetic domains are always magnetic monopoles themselves.

And two neighboring magnetic domains must always have opposite magnetic charge; the domain walls separate the magnetic domains in an active way; the walls must have surpluses of electron pairs and the spinning of these electron pairs must be responsible for the separation of the magnetic domains.

All in all these magnetic domains & walls are a beautiful was to store a bit more energy into ferro magnetic materials. 

In another development, I found out that more or less five years ago on 28 may 2014 I wrote for the first time on the impossibility that electrons are magnetic dipoles. So this is the sixth year of my investigations into the matter and of course the university people do nothing day in day out year in year out.

Do you hear me utter the word shitholes? No you don't, five years back I already understood how universities work because back in 1992 I had decided not to try and get a phd. Why try to work four years on a row with people that are mathematically inferior anyway? 

The same goes for physics, if there is a clear fault like in the present case of electron spin understanding it is almost impossible to repair that. The way universities run does never promote quick & easy repair of past knowledge. On the contrary, everything is pointing towards more polishing existing knowledge and fine tuning the stuff and that's it. Some unemployed person with too much free time on his hands finding out that there is something wrong with electron spin, give me a break the university perfumed princes have more important matters on their minds...

Here is a picture of a nice experiment where two small stacks of neodymium magnets are place in a rejecting fashion as high as possible. The magnets still are attracted to the iron in the axe, the attraction is bigger compared to the repulsion.

At first I found this a perfect way of explaining how the formation of magnetic domains takes place. One day later I had to laugh very hard when I understood how the university weirdo's would digest the results of such a simple experiment:  

Nothing will change because if it not pleases the ego of a university professor it is irrelevant. So I study this stuff now for about five years and likely in the year 2014 once more nothing has changed and the electron will still be a magnetic dipole as promoted by the future physics professors... 

Click on the picture to land at reason number 74:

 

Ok, that was it. Till updates my dear reader.  

 

(30 May 2019)  A lot has happened in the last two weeks, Theresa May is stepping down as the British pm, the Dutch king has invited donald trump for a visit to our country, the summer is still cool and not hot like last year, I found a crazy application of the 4D complex number determinants but I am not sure if I am not fooling myself, European elections came along, I made a clock after I found a 1.95 € so called uurwerk at the local Hornbach, and so on and so on.

I cherry pick on the EU elections because in my country (the Dutch landscape) two parties that are rather anti Europa are the main losers in these electrons. That is our item for today: 

Item 1) Ha ha, shithead Geert Wilders PVV no longer in EU parliament.

 Item 1) Ha ha, shithead Geert Wilders PVV no longer in EU parliament.

It seems that the PVV has won zero seats in the European parliament, as a side note if the UK leaves the EU they will get one seat. The political party PVV is not actual a political party, you cannot become a member of it. The PVV has only one member: shithead Geert Wilders.  

This update is not supposed to be some political rant or so, no it is only abut how healthy your brains run. And the shithead Geert Wilders kept on remarking that they have done a bad job at explaining to people as why Nexit would be a good thing. Nexit being of course we leaving the European Union.  

You know I don't care what political views people have, what much more matters is if the stuff involved is carefully thought through. And since you do not need that many brain cells in order to understand that the EU market is good for our economy BIG TIME, we conclude that shithead Geert Wilders does not have that tiny amount of properly working brain cells. 

Oh oh, that brings back old memories. Years ago the shithead party PVV came up with some report that for our country to leave the EU would have great benifits. It was stupid to the bone but now a few years later it is even more funny because that report was written by one of those weird UK think tanks. Just one of that weird stuff like in the USA they have so called 'Prager university'. It is not a university at all but some stupid think tank that promotes stuff like 'More CO2 in the air is a good thing for plants'. 

 

Picture source: https://www.ad.nl/politiek/pvv-en-sp-met-lege-handen~ae76090f/  

Ok, that was it. As you see I am trying to make my life as boring as possible by paying attention to shithead Geert Wilders & once more: how many EU seats? 

End of this update. Vote well and video well. 

 

(14 May 2019) Last week I placed reason nr 73 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles into the magnetic pages. It is about the Goldsmit & Uhlenbach guys that made an important contribution to quantum mechanics: Electron spin is an intrinsic property of the electrons.

Needless to say I think otherwise and I was that lucky to stumble upon a translation of a 1971 lecture from Mr. Goldsmit. If you read it, it is crazy stuff. I had to read it about three times until I stopped falling from one amazement into the other. 

I had always suspected something sloppy was going on with that old discovery, the translation of the 1971 lecture more or less confirms that in my view.  

But this update is just two posters. I always skip many years between making posters because you need to hang them somewhere in your house. After all why make a poster and not print it out? 

Item 1) Two boring posters about the calculation of the 7D circular tau.

 Item 1) Two boring posters about the calculation of the 7D circular tau.

It is very seldom I print my work out because I am bad at throwing print away a few years later. But there is a small part in my house that finally will get some kind of math filling with one of these posters. I think it will be the colorful one. 

Here are the posters, if you click on the picture you get them at 50x70 cm. If you want to print them out, use a resolution of 96 dpi. I remember it was a great work to write the details of the calculation of the 7D number tau; I still like it so likely it will stand the test of time... 

 

And a black & white version of this:

 

For myself speaking; the line with the first imaginary component is for sure one of the most beautiful lines I have ever written. 

Ok, it is time to split. Till updates my dear reader. 

 

 (05 May 2019) Why not another stupid video? A few years back I observed the genius Leonard Susskind (he is a genius because he more or less invented string theory without any use of exponential circles or exponential curves) talking weird stuff about black holes.  

At present day Leonard still is as crazy as can be. 

Item 1) Modern day black hole studies.

 Item 1) Modern day black hole studies.

In short the genial insights go as follows: 

You have a bunch of entangled pairs of particles.
You separate them while leaving them entangled.
Alica and Bob get each one particle of every pair.
They both make a black hole from those particles.
They jump into the black holes they crafted.
They meet in the middle. 

I have no comment whatsoever on this genius eruption of nonsense.
I also know that a lot of people think that I am the crazy one with thinking that electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles. So both Leonard and me, we live in crazyland.

The entire video is about 78 minutes long, if you like the wisdom shown in the video a lot that means your brain more or less works like the brain of the present day genius Leonard Susskind. Click on the picture to view this 78 minutes of physics genius stuff: 

 

Youtube source: 

The Quantum Origins of Gravity by Leonard Susskind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruJgtjpSoPk 

I hope you now see I am only trying to do a very moderate thing: trying to prove the electron is not a magnetic dipole is more or less a modest undertaking. 

Talking out of your neck about black holes is another level of interesting behavior.

Let me not classify this kind of stupid theoretical exercises, why don't those weird people not jump in a black hole and see if they can meet in the middle?

Till updates.   

 

(03 May 2019) It is about time for a fresh update. The last weeks I had nothing to say so why post stuff if I basically have nothing to say? Today we go over the most stupid video I observed today and that is another dumb video by the SciShow channel about the keto diet. Now I do not recommend any kind of diet, but the way I eat resembles very much about what the keto stuff is: keeping your insulin levels low almost all of the time. 

Item 1) And another fatty explaining the keto diet...

  Item 1) And another fatty explaining the keto diet...

On the Youtube SciShow channel once more they are very stupid when it comes to food. Present day understanding is that fat storage in the human body is regulated by at least four hormones and the most mighty one is king insulin. 

One of the more important tasks of insulin is that when your blood sugar levels get too high, the king sets in and increased levels of the hormone insulin ensure your body cells take in the poisonous excess sugar from your blood and it gets stored as fat. As a consequence all fat burning stops until insulin levels are low enough to give the fat burning process it's way. 

It is not only sugar, insulin also plays a role when you consume protein. I never studied it in detail but in your body delivering the right proteins at the right place on the right time is a handy thing. Insulin is not the enemy, but because it is such a mighty hormone it can mess up your body if you eat the wrong kind of foods. 

My entire life I often woke up in the middle of the night, often after about five hours of sleep and I had a terrible hunger. And I had a simple choice: eat something or stay awake for the rest of the night. I simply thought everybody had this, for me it was just normal. At present day I understand what I did wrong; my insulin levels were elevated and that prevented my body from burning enough fat. 

In the stupid video the keto diet is once more viewed as some eat as much meat as you can kind of weird stuff video. The SciShow weirdo's still have to figure out that if you eat far to much meat, the body turns the excess protein it cannot digest in other ways into glucose. It is a stupid video so if you are stupid too you likely will enjoy it.  

Click on the picture to enjoy the SciShow wisdom: 

 

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr9nwtu9Ph8 

Ok, let us split and I wish you happy eating. Till updates. 

 

(16 April 2019) Oh oh my credibility is on the line: About six months back I predicted a hard Brexit by now, but the whole stuff is postponed again by another six months. And I am just soo worried because if the Brits do not go out with a hard crash, the physics professors will use that as an argument that I have some mental thing and as such it is just so ridiculous to study electron spin. 

On the other hand I am in a good mood because my first serious math invention or discovery was the product integral; instead of adding all stuff up like in additive integration with the product integral everything gets multiplied. If memory serves I found that back in 1987, only 32 years back (yes I am getting old). 

The cute detail from back to 1987 is that I raised the function to the power dx, like in f(x)^dx, as far as I know in all literature I read about it, nobody did the obvious thing and raised it to the power dx... 

About 29 years later I found the first use of raising stuff to the power dx, it was from some university based in Malta of all places. But today there suddenly pooped up two video's about product integration. Has my miserable life all of a sudden a tiny glimmer of hope?  

Item 1) From miserable lives and glimmers of hope.

 Item 1) From miserable lives and glimmers of hope.

It is unbelievable but if today on my computer you type the search 'product integral' on the Youtube channel you get the next unbelievable screen shot: 

 

I recognized the first video instantly as an additive integral although the very enthusiastic Flammable Maths guy thinks it is a product integral. No no, you have to put that integral in the exponent and you have your desired product integral. 

The second video from Dr. Peyam is a bit more advanced but he does not have a clue about how to differentiate the functions involved.

Anyway it is good news, the flame guy for his enthousiasm and the Dr. Peyam guy for the depth and broadness of his mathematical investigations. 

Wow man, 32 years of almost nothing and within one week two video's about product integrals. That more or less means that the entire humanity has only figured out in the year 2050 or beyond that electrons are not magnetic dipoles.

Ok ok, since I know those product integral a long time, here is an old pdf file under the title Ten styles for product integration and differentiation

Video links: Flammable Math enthusiast:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqmIGr68RCo 

The Dr. Peyam doing what I did in my first year of math studies:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shdK9DAiDBE  

Ok, that was it for this small update. Till updates my dear reader. 

 

(07 April 2019) It would be tempting to comment on a tweet written by Brexiteer Jacob Rees Mogg where he calls for all kinds of sabotage of the EU in case there will be a longer extension to the breaking up of the UK & EU. 

I don't know why Jacob wrote this, may be it is an attempt to provoke EU officials, may be it serves some inner British political goal. I don't know but the words of the child Jacob Rees Mogg have been noticed with a little smile on my face.

This update is another cute video of Paul Sutter, in this case he explains electron spin... 

Item 1) Paul Sutter on discovery & explanation of electron spin.

 Item 1) Paul Sutter on discovery & explanation of electron spin.

On the other website I already posted a tongue in cheek kind of update about Paul Sutter explaining permanent magnets. Here is a link: 

http://3dcomplexnumbers.net/2019/03/27/what-would-a-quantum-measurement-
on-paul-his-iq-yield/ 

And like said in the previous post on this: Do not take it out at Paul Sutter in any way because he is just explaining the main view inside physics how permanent magnetism is understood. And for today's update; how electron spin is understood. 

Of course the famous Stern-Gerlach experiment is spoken about. This video is not so riddled with faults as the previous one on permanent magnets, but here Paul describes an experiment where all electrons are supposed to have a spin with a (vector) direction.

But the outcome of the SG experiment was a split into two beams of silver ions, independent of any direction of the electron spin.

And instead of the conclusion that electrons do not have magnetic dipoles that are pointing in some direction, you get the usual bunch of nonsense like in a 'mysterious fashion this quantum information of the direction of the electron spin disappears' and more of that blah blah blah.

Here is the video, click on the picture to watch it: 

 

Youtube source link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TD7wL6yIegY 

What is missing in the video is how the professional physics professors explain how a magnetic dipole electron gets accelerated: It must be a non-constant or inhomogeneous magnetic field. That only means it is stronger or more concentrated at the north pole while the south pole is more stretched out and is weaker.  

And because the magnetic field is non-constant, there is a tiny difference in forces on the north and south pole of the electron and that should explain the observed acceleration.

That my dear reader is totally bogus. Electron size is not well known but it is in the range of 10^-16 meter. It is impossible to achieve any acceleration via the non-constant magnetic field, the spatial gradient needed says gradients like 100 thousand Tesla per meter weaker or stronger.

That is why you never see a calculation accompanying the blah blah blah of the inhomogeneous magnetic fields...

If my version of electron magnetism is correct, it should not matter at all if the magnetic field is constant or not. After all if electrons carry magnetic charge, that explains experiments like the SG experiment much better. And you do not have to shout all of the time that quantum mechanics is so difficult that if you think you understand it, you don't understand it...

Ok, let me leave it with that. Till updates. 

 

(30 March 2019) Yesterday the Brexit deal was voted down a third time in the UK parliament. I am glad my original insight from back when the deal was just struck still stays alive. The insight was the deal between the EU & UK will not pass the UK parliament because there is not a majority of anything and that lack of majority for anything is directly related to all that emotion that is going round. 

Item 1) More stupid Brexit emotion observed. 

  Item 1) More stupid Brexit emotion observed. 

Very often you come across crazy lines of reasoning. For example there are a whole lot of Brexiteers that easily state the next: 

If we go out without a deal we don't have to pay the 39€ billion and after that because we are such a huge economy we will get a free trade deal with the EU. 

For me it is hard to understand why people hang on to such weird stuff. Due to all that multiyear financial planning we have over here in Europe, a lot of things are not done in just one single fiscal year but spread out over more years. As such the UK has committed to the multi year stuff, so that has to be paid. It is not upfront that 39 billion €, why should it be. Other European nations also don't have to pay upfront because that is why we have those multi year budgets in the first place.  

I don't know much about legal matters, but likely it is illegal for the UK to scrap those long standing commitments.

Anyway to try and explain to a Brexit believer why this is nonsense you likely end up with the same problem of explaining to a professional physics professor that electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles, have never been magnetic dipoles and in the future electrons will never be magnetic dipoles.

Now physics professors are the so called 'scientists' but if they get emotional no logic will bring clarity to their brains: It is emotional reasons only that the professors will keep on doing their stuff like they want it.

Another example would be explaining to math professors how to craft 4D complex numbers. All of a sudden nobody is interested just like the average Brexit supporter not very much interested in the tiny fact it is really fucking hard not to pay your old long standing financial obligations while getting a free deal trade later. 

In this world there is never a shortage of dumb people, they are found everywhere; from garbage collectors to high shot university professors.  

The most stupid news headline I found today is the next weird text, it sounds very much like some 'get rich quick scheme' or 'burn body fat fast' if you do just 'this one trick'.
The title alone is just so stupid that it brings a smile on my face:

Peter Bone DEMANDS ALL Brexiteers UNITE and do this ONE thing to SECURE Brexit   

Link:  https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1107325/Brexit-news-march-
westminster-peter-bone-theresa-may-deal-vote-result 

Oh oh, why are those Brexit people always so stupid? How likely is it they will 'unite' or do 'just one thing'.  

 

Go bone yourself my dear UK folks. End of this update. Till updates.

  

(26 March 2019) I neglected an old hobby of mine for too long: the US Federal deficit. 

Item 1) Wow, amazing monthly US Federal deficit observed: only $234 billion.

 Item 1) Wow, amazing monthly US Federal deficit observed: only $234 billion.

It looks like the growth of the US Federal deficit is more or less on it's predictive path. It also wasn't that long ago that only three times 234 billion US$, that was more or less the entire US military budget.

It has to be remarked that February is always a peak month when it comes to US Federal deficits. So You must not extrapolate this to a yearly US Federal deficit of twelve times 234 Billion.

After having said that, let me keep this post short & only one funny link:

US budget deficit hit $234 billion in February, a new monthly record

Ok ok, I will not deny I have such a little smile on my face.

For the time being I will deny that I am activating the third so called 'Nightmare on WallStreet'. Is it possible to cut the DOW in half once more?

Who knows? Till updates my dear reader.    

 

(13 March 2019) Oh shit my computer has broken down further; the biggest hard disk broke and I lost a significant part of my music files... On the other hand in 2015 I already build a spare computer and a half year back that thing did not fire up anymore but now it works again. I don't know why it works again but that is a good shot into the right direction.

Although my biggest hard disk is broken, there is amazing little damage. Ok it is no fun to loose such an amount of music files but my back up system works very well all in all: no critical files lost... 

It is tempting to write a piece upon how to build you own desktop computer for use at home but we also have Brexit. Last evening the deal between the EU & UK has been voted down a second time. The problem stays the so called back stop and in my view this shows that a lot of Brits have an emotional problem with the EU. 

All that hysteria and zero constructive thinking; for example why should the EU hijack North Ireland indefinitely as such 'confiscating' North Ireland within the EU? 

Item 1) Brexit as an emotional problem; why don't they solve the border issues?

 Item 1) Brexit as an emotional problem; why don't they solve the border issues?

It is not my problem in the sense I did not cause it, it is not caused by the EU but the Brits want no border between North Ireland & Ireland and as such border facilities and handling must be done in other places. 

For example a bunch of containers go from the UK via Northern Ireland to Ireland and possible the rest of Europe. All that needs to happen is that this container is inspected, possible tariffs paid and that it gets sealed if the destination is Ireland or other European countries. 

Such is seal is of course illegal to break in North Ireland, only containers with a valid seal can cross the border between the North & Southern part of Ireland. 

How hard can it be? 

Ok given future deviation of UK standards & legislation the problem of smuggling things will evolve over time. But the idea of having those border facilities along the coast and not land inwards is not a bad idea. 

But week in week out all you hear from those British politicians that there need to be 'alternative arrangements' or stuff like that. They never explain how they want to do that. 

So not much happens beside a lot of emotion and only little reason behind what we observe in the news. It is in many ways an emotional problem where the Brexeteers constantly portrait Europe as a bad or even an evil entity. 

Again: That is an emotional and irrational view of Europe. Europe is 27 nations together and as such everything has to be done in accordance to all kind of legal stuff. If you hear a lot of those UK political folks, they talk like Europe is just one person that you deal with. 

And again: That kind of stuff is only emotional stuff.

 

But for myself speaking I am glad my insight from Nov last year is still standing:
Likely the UK is going to crash out without a deal...

Till updates (new updates make take some time because I think I also need a new motherboard, but anyway). So pop up a beer or a green tea or if you are a Brit; pour also some milk in the tea.   

 

(07 March 2019) Yesterday I finished reason number 71 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles. It is based on the result as found in a video about quantum computing, I hope that is not confusing and the quantum computing thing can be skipped because the video contains a perfect explanation about so called Rabi frequency.

Item 1) Rabi freq = 0.5*Lamor freq? Compare the two different explanations.

 Item 1) Rabi freq = 0.5*Lamor freq? Compare the two different explanations.

I am glad I came upon this video, it is from a Berkeley guy and he is very good at explaining stuff. Often when you view video's upon physics, whether it is quantum computing or electron spin or whatever what, very often the people explaining the stuff are not very good at explaining.  

Being a good teacher is an art in itself because beside your own knowledge you must also have a good insight in how your audience will react to new stuff. Luckily the Berkeley guy (Umesh V. Vazirani is his name) is relatively good at explaining the stuff involved. 

And I finally understand what the community of physics professors is doing with explaining Rabi frequency with all those weird rotating magnetic fields... They use two of those rotating fields, they rotate against each other and their super position is the applied oscillating magnetic field.  

There is only one tiny problem: They can use only one of those magnetic fields and as such the other purely hypothetical rotating field is just not talked about any more. 

I have to say it is a very ingenious explanation; in reality you apply an oscillating magnetic field, you decompose it into two rotating magnetic fields and after that you only use one of those rotating things while neglecting the other for the full 100% and that is how professional physics professors get their salary every month. 

My own explanation goes via the work done by the real applied magnetic field and if the energy transfer to the electron can only be done by an oscillating magnetic field, I am very pleased with a result like that: 

It more or less validates that the electric and magnetic properties of each electron are more or less equal in strength. After all if work done by a magnetic field give photons of half the frequency of the applied magnetic field, that means those Rabi photons have half of the energy of the Lamor photons.

That brings a big smile to my face while on the other hand I understand it will not make much of a difference if I post reason 71 or reason 710:

University people will always have more important things to do.

The next picture is almost unreadable unless you already know what it says but if you click on it you will land at reason number 71 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles:

 

Ok, it is little bit for the nerdy diehards that like to understand a bit more about what is all happening with spin resonance and how it emerges. Electrons only radiate photons when they are accelerated, all that wiggle wiggle stuff like precession of the spin is still not very convincing to me: nothing accelerates so what explains the photon radiation anyway?  

No, normal people are at best interested in how Brexit will evolve or how good Ajax has done in beating Real Madrid. Ok, I liked it too but does that make me a normal person? 

 

That was it for this update. See you around. 

 

(22 Feb 2019) The TLDR channel had a funny video out where the Brexit no deal scenario is viewed as an elementary example in game theory: the prisoners dilemma. 

Item 1) No deal Brexit as game theory?

 Item 1) No deal Brexit as game theory?

I won't explain the so called prisoners dilemma because I guess if you visit this website every now and then, you likely already know what it is. It is quite a stretch to view the inner workings of a parliament like the British parliament in the view of such simple things like the prisoners dilemma. On the other hand, the UK has had for a long long time just two main democratic parties and for years and years I am thinking those simple binary democracies are not in the most stable state. 

Take for example the USA where they have a binary party structure too, most of the time the political balance flips because people are getting bored by constantly more of the same stuff. And when the other side takes over after such a political shift, whether this is Congress, Senate or the POTUS, often the newcomers try to turn back a lot of what the previous rulers did... 

At present we have an extreme example of this where the piece of shit named donald trump tried to turn as much as possible back from the Obama era. For example the latest rumors indicate that piece of shit donald wants a Nobel peace prize too... (Anyway, the Japanese do not comment on it but it seems some Japanese pee pee whores have written a letter with a recommendation that piece of shit donald should get the Nobel peace prize).

But let me not discuss the long term stability of binary democracies. Just enjoy the video and try to figure out if you can use such simple versions of game theory when it comes to the British parliament. You might think such simple models just cannot be a predictable fit but in practice there still are many mp's who think that Europe will change it's position just in time... Like it is 'just a negotiating tactic'. 

Nope, the deal was negotiated over two years by 27 other nations. That is not something that flips overnight.  

Here is the video: 

 

Title & link:  Game Theory Explains Why No Deal is Inevitable - Brexit Explained
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHiT9VPkgUY

Ok, that was it. Till updates. 

 

(18 Feb 2019) Two days back I posted reason number 70 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles. That is the item for this update: 

Item 1) Reason 70 posted; ion behavior in an electric field.

 Item 1) Reason 70 posted; ion behavior in an electric field.

In reason 70 I entertain a simple thought experiment from let's say back in time when they first found out the existence of ions. And back in the time they hypothetically send a stream of ions through a vertical electric field. 

And the result was that it did split in two beams. The explanation was given as follows: 

Ions are electric dipoles and those that align with the electric field move up while the ions that anti-align with the electric field move down.

Would you believe such an explanation? 

No of course not. We now know that ions are just atoms or molecules with either a surplus of a shortage of electrons. Atoms can have small electric dipole moments but that is only related to the spatial configuration of the electrons. See for example the water molecule; it is not an ion but has a tiny electric dipole thing going on because of the structure of the water molecule (it is not a linear molecule shape). 

Anyway let me stop doing the blah blah thing and keep this update short.
Click on the picture below that is the good old photo from the Stern Gerlach experiment from the year 1922: 

 

And never forget the original SG experiment was done with silver, that is silver vapor so to say and that is extremely hot and as such most of the silver vapor will be ionized. That is important to understand for the obvious reasons: all electron pairs are magnetically neutral so only unpaired electrons rule the magnetic properties on the atomic scale. 

Ok, that was it. Till updates. 

 

(12 Feb 2019) Oh oh Brexit, why do I love you so much? The answer is of course that it is all so unpredictable. It is hard to see how for example stuff looks in about 12 months... For myself speaking I hope there will be no free trade deal between the EU & the UK. I think it is better there will be trade tarifs on goods, but what about all those services they seem to have? 

Anyway, with amazement today I looked at a video about Brexit. I considered it rather funny and likely you will doubt my sense of humor. But anyway: 

Item 1) Lord of the Ring goes Brexit.

 Item 1) Lord of the Ring goes Brexit.

Lets simply say Brexit is entering the popular domain...
Click on the picture for the video: 

 

Picture source: Corbyn Consoles May | Lord of The Rings Brexit Impressions Dub
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oB87DAvCMY 

It is rather refreshing after staring so much about what is going on over there like in the British parliament and stuff. 

So what are you'll do with the deal? Till updates. 

 

(09 Feb 2019) Usually I just neglect ignorant video's from Youtube. For example a flat earther has found a new proof for the earth being flat? I can't care less. 

But both yesterday and today the Scishow channel on Youtube had a horrible video out. The one from yesterday was about nuclear fusion and the one from to today about as why it is so hard to loose weight. 

Item 1) Why do people get obese?

 Item 1) Why do people get obese?

In my view this is because the body cannot burn the body fat when that is needed and as such you get hungry and eat more compared to a situation where the body simply could burn the fat and you would not get hungry in the first place. 

For example since my teenage years I often woke up in the middle of the night because I was hungry. And I had to eat a little bit because otherwise I would not fall to sleep again.  

At present day I simply understand that my insulin levels were just too high and that prevents the body from burning fat. If you fix that (most of the time it is just an insulin problem, at least in males) your body will happily return to a non obese status.  

The days when I was fat I was hungry most of the time but no matter how much I ate, the hunger did not go away... At present day I understand I had developed that nice thing known as insulin resistance, a condition where the body does not respond properly to the larger and larger amounts of insulin. 

__________ 

In the video the weight loss is presented as something that is difficult because the body reacts strongly against it, is wrong in my view. You should not go on hefty calorie restriction but for an obese person only go back from what they eat every day to what a normal level of calories should be.  

Once you have repaired your hormones, likely you should not go back to your old ways of eating. Your old ways made you fat in the first place so why repeat that whole process? 

Anyway, the scishow video also has a few good points in it because it shows your more or less a rude version of present day understanding of the most important hormones that rule body weight. And insulin is the king of hormones because one of the noble tasks of the king is to prevent too high blood sugar levels. 

Click on the picture for the video: 

 

Source: The Real Reason It's So Hard to Lose Weight
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orh1W0sxCQI

Ok, let me leave it with that. Till updates. 

 

(08 Feb 2019) This is a short update: only two links about how to change electron spin using electric fields. Needless to say I have my doubts on scientific endeavors like that because I think electrons carry magnetic charge. And flipping the magnetic charge with an electric field looks like a very very hard task.

Item 1) Comparing two publications.

 Item 1) Comparing two publications.

I will not dive too deep into the details, if you want just read the intro's to the underlying stuff about 'controlling' the electron magnetic spin with electrical fields. 

I just picked two things from a simple internet search, one is from the year 2007 and the other from 2018. In my opinion it looks like zero progress. 

From the year 2007:
Coherent Control of a Single Electron Spin with Electric Fields
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/318/5855/1430 

From the year 2018:
Controlling magnetic spin with electric fields
https://phys.org/news/2018-06-magnetic-electric-fields.html#nRlv 

That does not look like much progress. On the contrary it looks just like reality: all kinds of government tax money flows to universities while money for a real proof that electrons are in fact magnetic dipoles just is never there.

The whole universe might fall apart rapidly if electrons were indeed magnetic dipoles, but try to explain that to a professional physics professor... 

Let's leave this short update with that, till updates. 

 

06 Feb 2019) Brexit oh Brexit why do I love you so much? Well that is very simple: it is all so complicated that it is hard to predict what the future will bring on all kinds of details. But in my world there are more interesting problems to crack: how long will it take before there is a more fundamental proof that electrons are actually magnetic dipoles? 

But let us not loose ourselves in the things we don't know or that are hard to estimate and look more at what we do know: 

Item 1) Part 20 in the basics for 4D complex numbers.

 Item 1) Part 20 in the basics for 4D complex numbers.

It is about the structure of all non-invertible four dimensional complex numbers. I am relatively satisfied about it because I remember when a couple of years back I tried to find only one non-invertible numbers and man that was hard work! Link: 

http://3dcomplexnumbers.net/2019/02/02/part-20-on-the-
structure-of-non-invertible-4d-complex-numbers/ 

Yet I found a cute picture representing all non-invertibles in the purely imaginary part of the 4D complex numbers. And at the same time I found the pair of so called divisors of zero in that putely imaginary part of the 4D complex numbers. 

So only professional math professors will argue you learn nothing from that. That might be true, but I learned a little bit of how those divisors of zero looked: 

Purely imaginary and evidently perpendicular to each other. 

Anyway here is a hastily crafted teaser picture and if you click on it you will land at the same link as above:

 

Ok, that was it. Have a nice Brexit and likely we have to wait till after the deed and inspect the economical damage & and start mopping it up.  

Till updates.  

 

(28 Jan 2018) Last week my smart television started to suggest to me I should look at video's from a chick named Jilian Michaels. I did not have a clue who she is but it turned out she was one of the trainers of a show called The Biggest Loser. That was a show where fat Americans tried to loose as much weight as possible and you won by losing the most kilo's of body weight. 

That is the item for this update: 

Item 1) Who the hell is Jilian Michaels?

 Item 1) Who the hell is Jilian Michaels?

When you are too fat, like I had become in the year 2011, you might want to shed a few kilo's of fat. And for that you only need to understand that your body can only burn fat if your levels of the hormone insulin are low enough. 

So after researching the fine art of loosing weight I arrived at the conclusion that I simply had to cut out a whole lot of carbs like potatoes, rice, wheat products like bread etc etc. It was only later that I found out that this was the goal of the so called keto diet, it tries to do the same as I had found out: keep your insulin levels as low as possible all of the time. 

If you go out on calorie restriction only and exercise as much as possible, that is not very good for your body. It seems to lower your basic metabolic rate for the rest of your life. A lot of participants in that show the biggest loser seem to have a crippled metabolic rate even five years later, I heard one of those female participants state she could only eat about 1400 Cal a day in order to stay at a stable body weight... 

That means the way the participants of the show named the biggest loser were guided was wrong: If you restrict calorie intake while still eating carbs, your body still cannot burn the body fat and as such your body will adept to lower energy output. Think about the poor female mentioned above: If you can only eat 1400 Cal a day while keeping a stable weight that means she can only expend 1400 Cal a day... 

As a joke you can say: All those participants in the biggest loser were put on a concentration camp diet.  

Ok ok, in the concentration camps survival rate was far below those who participated in the loser show but hey it is just a joke.

__________ 

For myself speaking I was bewildered as why Jilian Michaels was so heavy attacked by a lot of video's. She is a good looking chick so why get upset? 

Some time back we also had the American and Dutch heart association coming out with the statement that using coconut oil was dangerous because it was saturated fat... 

No, fats only become a health problem if your body cannot burn dietary fat like when you are eating too much carbs... And the American and Dutch heart association got a little bit of critique but chick Lilian get much much more video's blasting at her.

Anyway, this evening I looked at the entire Julian Michaels thing that started it all. It is a video posted on 'big think'. Here is our Jilian chick, click on the picture for the video: 

 

Video source file: Jillian Michaels: Don't believe the keto diet hype
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOPOcBVzm7s 

The Jilian chick is indeed very stupid: I lost about 30+ kilo of body fat and my weight is very stable ever after. As a contrary most of the participants of the biggest loser show are crippled for life because it could very well be that their basic metabolic rate is crippled for life. 

Ok, that was it. Have a slim life or try to get crippled forever yourself.
Till updates. 

 

(16 Jan 2019) A shorty on Brexit: Prepare for a hard Brexit?

Item 1) Prepare for a hard Brexit?

 Item 1) Prepare for a hard Brexit?

Two months back on 16 Nov finally the deal between the EU & UK was reached. At that point in time I more or less remarked that finalizing this deal was a lot of work because all I knew it also had to pass all European parliaments.

And I remarked that weirdly enough the parliament that most likely would vote it down was the UK parliament. After that it was 4 weeks of waiting because the UK parliament would vote on 11 Dec...

Well that vote got postponed to 15 Jan 2019 and indeed the deal was voted away by a huge margin of 230.

So all in all, the likelihood of the British crashing out the European union is strongly increasing. Like said before: Let them crash out and mop up the economical damage later.

For trade this should mean a fall back to the basics of the WTO rules & tariffs that come with that. This is a huge disruption to industrial supply chains where parts cross the border many times. So likely the whole integration of European industries will get a bit disrupted. 

At present the size of the UK economy is about the 19 smallest European nations combined, so it will be a huge change when on the 28-th of March this year the UK economy will become a competitor instead of an integrated part of Europe.

Now anything can happen but like said before: There are so many weirdo's in the UK, weirdo's like Boris Johnson and the Reed Moss guy and they represent a stream of weird emotion that just has to run it's course.

Just like 12 years back you look at the financial sector and only wondering why they act so strange? They acted so strange because almost nobody understood what they were actually doing. From that kind of perspective at this point in time there still are a lot of weirdo's over there in the UK and only time will bring an infitesimal of wisdom to those Brexiteers. 

There is an old song that is appropriate for the present situation, the UK can hit the road so they can do their thing. Click on the next picture for a nice remix of the song 'Hit the road Jack': 

 

Link in the picture:   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_cHddNaKQo

Ok, have a nice Brexit and let me leave it with that. Till updates. 

 

(12 Jan 2019) Ok ok with a bit of reservation I opened page 4 into the magnetic stuff. 

Item 1) Ok Jack, let's hit the road for one more year. 

 Item 1) Ok Jack, let's hit the road for one more year. 

There is an old song with the title 'Hit the road Jack' where the female singer makes clear she does not want to see the Jack guy ever again. 

In the last year I had similar feelings about all that magnetic stuff. And I don't know why but about one year back I more or less started thinking about trying to write a so called 'official publication' into the magnetic properties of electrons & the likes. 

And I don't know why I was that stupid; it is hard to imagine that any paper that says electrons carry magnetic charge will make it past the so called peer review process. 

Of course that will not happen and although that was rather frustrating for me I also had to laugh about me being stupid: 

With all the math written down year in year out, never ever I thought like let's try to get an 'official math publication' out...

No ,just never. So why was I that stupid and think otherwise when it comes to physics?

Why was I that stupid? 

But magnetism is also fun so although I still have a lot of reservations, precautions, preambles, second thoughts, about all things official, why not go on for one more year?

After all if electrons carry magnetic charge, that changes your view on physical reality a little bit in a beautiful way.

I crafted a short so called 'Elevator pitch' that you can see in the next picture. Page 4 is your end destination if you click on the picture:

 

The 20 seconds pitch is a tiny bit over the top, but basically the present version of an electron being a magnetic dipole doesn't add up: it is was a magnetic dipole it would be magnetically neutral. 

In my view electrons are not magnetically neutral. 

Till updates. 

 

 

(03 Jan 2019) A happy new year to all! Over here we had nice festivities, not much damage at all while in our street it was at a record level of people ever. Ok there is still plenty of broken glass on the streets but those city workers can't clean up the entire town in just one or two days of course... 

But I wanted only to show you four integrals that honestly I cannot crack. I know the outcome because these four integrals make up the famous 4D number tau and since tau is a 4D log it might very well be these four integrals do not have a simple to write down primitive. 

Item 1) How to crack these four integrals? 

 Item 1) How to crack these four integrals? 

May be I am just stupid and if you feed those four integrals into one of those math software packages that are capable of finding the primitive of an integrand, you get an answer that is more or less comprehensible to a human brain. 

But of course I do not have such expensive software packages like mathematica & the likes. There seems to be an open source alternative named Axiom that is also very good at finding such primitives, but until now I only found some of those dot tar files and they are for unix systems so that is not going to work. 

Anyway I can crack these four integrals with matrix diagonalization, but as far as I know this technique is not used in such packages since at best they use 2D complex numbers only.  

Here is a small and unreadable picture of only 450 pixels wide, if you click on it you get a version of 1500 pixels wide: 

 

For the rest of this year when it comes to the magnetic stuff, I am more or less planning to go on with a new page on more reasons as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles. But on the other hand I have already 60+ reasons found as why electrons must be magnetic monopoles. 

And you do not have to think very long about this: If electrons are magnetic dipoles with a north and a south pole, in that case they are magnetically speaking neutral. But those paramagnetic materials like iron are only magnetic when they have unpaired electrons... 

In my view the electron pair is magnetically neutral while the unpaired electrons are not. 

This is not very hard to understand or to think through. 

So are those physics professors just too stupid or do they have some emotional blockade? I think it is the latter and that makes it more or less completely irrelevant if I try to find more and more reasons over the coming years that show electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles. 

A few years back I imagined that by now I would be capable of finding Youtuve video's where the idea of electrons being magnetic monopoles would be ridiculed by professional physics professors.  

But there is only silence. 

_________ 

Luckily I have more hobbies than electron spin. Woodworking is also a nice hobby and I am making a new wash drying rack. It is a heave duty one because the wooden beam is rather big compared to the light weight wash drying racks most people use.   

It's by far not finished because what in a normal industrial produces thing is a line where you hang your laundry from, I need wooden strips. Of course I could also use plastic wash dryer lines but hey let me have an 'emotional blockade' too and only use more wood & steel in order to finish my wash drying rack.

 

Wow man there are all kinds of electrons inside the wood. Would all this wood just fall apart if the electrons were truly magnetic dipoles?

Who knows, anyway have a happy new year. 

  

(27 Dec 2018) Today only a short video with the funny title 'Is your brain shrinking?' 

Political developments have gone fast in the last week in the USA, may be more and more trump supporters are finally realizing the guy they support has a very deep rooted 'mental thing'. With 'mental thing' of course I mean that in case the donald is mentally ill, I think it must have some biological basis.  

But let's skip all things political and turn to the funny video. 

Item 1) Is your brain shrinking?

 Item 1) Is your brain shrinking?

The video is from dr. Berg. In my house Mr. Berg is held in relatively high esteem because years back when I tried to loose some weight it was the Eric Berg guy that remarked just eating a few slices of bread ensures you cannot burn fat for a long time.  

At that point in time for me that was a real eye opener, after all bread is generally considered a healthy kind of food. And in my search of what I was doing wrong, I succeeded in loosing about 30 kg and stay stable in weight after that year in year out. 

So I changed my way of eating with a simple to understand goal in mind: Keep those fucking blood sugar levels low and as such eat so that insulin levels never spike too much. 

It was only later I found out this was more or less the ketogenic diet. I don't recommend any kind of diet, there are plenty of elderly people that start the day with a breakfast and eat a few slices of healthy whole wheat bread and stay slim forever. But the obesity crises tells us there is more going on: you can only get obese when you just never can burn the fat... 

__________ 

I like those difficult to understand problems, like the Brexit problem we have lately here in Europe. Brexit is a fascinating problem because it is so extremely hard to predict what the future will bring. 

Alzheimer is also on the list of problems that have my attention because I think this basically is an energy problem for the brain. The more insulin resistant the brain becomes the more it looses the capability to run on glucose and as such needs alternative fuel in order to keep tidy and clean.

The problem with the Alzheimer illness is that it develops so slow, so for a person who is developing this there never ever is dramatic point in time where it is clear you have to change your food habits.  

But enough of the blah blah blah. Here is the video: 

 

Video source:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOdz26znBbE

For myself speaking I hope this video is a sign of people slowly getting to recognize that indeed Alzheimer & similar illnesses of the brain are mostly caused by a lack of energy available. Things like medicine that removes the beta-amyloid plaques do not move the needle: removing a symptom does not change the root cause that is a lack of energy for the brain. 

Let's leave it with that. Till updates. 

 

(21 Dec 2018) The comedian Trevor Noah (or his team) had a perfect video out today. Normally for me it is impossible to look for about six minutes to donald trump but the video is really fascinating because it makes you wonder: why does donald trump behave the way he does? 

Item 1) Wow, 17 investigations into donald trump?

 Item 1) Wow, 17 investigations into donald trump?

It is no secret I think that donald trump is mentally ill. And with mentally ill I mean it has a biological basis that his brain works different compared to normal human brain activity. 

If it is more or less correct what the former CIA director James Comey said about donald trump, the fact donald has no morals, in that case for the donald not to behave in a criminal way is impossible. 

For the brain of donald trump it makes no difference if some act is criminal yes or no and since he also is impulsive it is impossible for donald not to break laws just all of the time. 

After two years into his presidency right now there are about 17 investigations going on and rumors say this spans his entire business history. Could be but my original thinking was that we are dealing with a mentally ill person.  

So the present day count of only 17 investigations adds some weight to that original insight from two years back.  

Anyway, the video about the crying man is wonderful. After all when I think of university people I cry a lot too. Really true...;) 

Click on the picture for the video, source link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcD0flYiSRU 

 

Today is the shortest day of the year. In case you feel depressed by all that lack of light and sunlight while your miserable life is only in the dark, why not look at much more videos of donald trump to get rid of your deep rooted winter depression? 

After all, only understanding a tiny part of the donald should drive away all of your depressions because you have not sunken that low yet... 

Let me leave it with that my dear reader. Till updates. 

 

(15 Dec 2018) A little bit more on the science of physics as a modern form or religion. I am well aware of the fact then when you as a reader read 'physics as a religion' you think I might be emotionally frustrated because my little corner of insights is not found back in mainstream physics. 

Well, I might be weird, but I am not as weird as for example the people from the Electric Universe. At the Electric Universe they are also frustrated because their insights might be very popular, but the physics people don't blink with their eyes. 

That is logical because the Electric Universe people have strange idea's like the earth is hollow (but NO reptilians inside) and gravity does not go with the speed of light but has infinite speed... Here is a link to a collection of those kind of idea's:
https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/

No no no, about zero frustration on my side. For me it is a very interesting problem: If I am correct with my idea's of electrons being magnetic monopoles, how the hell is it possible the professionals never think of that in about one century of time? 

Item 1) Is physics prey to the desire of the public for religious stuff?

 Item 1) Is physics prey to the desire of the public for religious stuff?

I have selected a video from the USA based physics professors, in this case it is one of those television physics professors Leonard Susskind. I selected Susskind because in another video I observed him stating that people who hold 'minority opinions' often don't make it.  

So I felt a tiny bit challenged, not that I got emotional but the Susskind guy also has a Youtube video out upon the details of electron spin and for me it is clear: Leonard is a conformist and as such makes the science of physics vulnerable to religious tendencies. 

For example: The video on electrons claim that if you measure electron spin in one direction, say vertically, if after that you measure the spin of the electron in another direction, say horizontally, you get 50/50 for spin is left or right. Can that be true?
Grab a strong magnet and hold it to your hand, now turn the magnet 90 degrees. Do half of the electron binding pairs in your hand fall apart because these pairs now have the same spin? Nope, although the application of a strong magnetic field clearly acts as a measurement on all electrons that 'feel' it never ever half of the electron pairs in your hand get broken by this... (That 50/50 stuff is only a theoretical thing, it is nice fancy math but if electrons have magnetic charge that is all it is: nice fancy math).
End of the example. (Link to the electron video from Leonard Susskind:
SIMPLEST Quantum Example - electron spin - SUSSKIND
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCymP87zFwc

__________

The main video I selected for this update is about string theory, string theory is cute math & I will not deny that. But does that fancy math have any relation with physical reality if later it is found out electrons are not magnetic dipoles? 

I simply think it is not. As long as string theory has only the electron magnetic dipole stuff in it, it will always be a shit-show theory. So if I have any emotion, it is a small smile on my face.

Here is the video, click on the picture:

 

At about 17 minutes into the video the daily workload of Leonard is explained, his daily workload does not differ that much from religious scholars: 

He comes in at about 10 hour in the morning. Has coffee for about one hour with his fellows and they talk all kinds of stuff. After that they part and spend the rest of the day doing their theoretical findings. 

Often their theoretical findings include calculations that use so called complex numbers. 

And I, I only have a little smile on my face while I am thinking about people who's math event horizon are the complex numbers from the complex plane... 

Let's leave it with that. Till updates my dear reader. 

 

(13 Dec 2018) It would be tempting to comment on the Brexit developments, but let me skip all that emotion. Ok ok, in the future I will bash a little bit more weirdo's like Boris Johnson. No, this update is just a short update upon electron spin. 

In my view electron spin is a magnetic charge just like the electron electric charge. But the magnetic charge of the electrons comes in only two varieties: either the north pole charge of the south pole charge. And that's it.

All that stuff like electrons are very small magnetic dipoles is nonsense. That nonsense directly arrives from the Gauss magnetic law that was formulated long long before the discovery of the electron. 

Item 1) A readable explanation of electron spin.

 Item 1) A readable explanation of electron spin.

Electron spin inside the science of physics is just like the gluten in your daily bread:
The body just cannot digest it in any meaningful way.  

If the professional physics professors explain electron spin, often it is explained like it is the earth spinning on it's axis. From that very fact you can observe the explanation is not carefully thought over.  

It is just like donald trump: you make up some stuff on the spot and that's it.
Fact checking? Never needed, why check experimental that electrons are 
actually magnetic dipoles? 

But I am not a dictator, if you want electrons to be magnetic dipoles I have no problem with that. Try for example the next 'experiment':

1) Think of electrons as magnetic dipoles, walk to the window of the room you are in and look outside. 

2) Think of electron as carriers of magnetic charge. Again walk to the window, look outside and what do you see? 

You see no difference. 

The only difference there might be is how you view and try to understand the world, the physical reality like looking out of your window always looks the same.

Here is a very readable explanation of present day understanding of electron spin, you can read it while you are in a super position of thinking: 

Electrons are magnetic dipoles versus electrons carry magnetic charge: 

Definition of Electron Spin
https://www.chemicool.com/definition/electron_spin.html 

Ok that was it, don't forget to look out of the window while asking yourself: do electrons carry magnetic charge?  

As you see on inspection: nothing changes.
Till updates. 

 

(05 Dec 2018) The 'What I've learned' channel on Youtube has a strong clue about something I have been suspecting for a long time: When you are young, your insulin levels decline much faster while when you get older in a lot of people this decline in insulin levels goes slower and slower. 

After all when I say you should eat less and less carbs if you get older, this decline in insulin levels becomes a problem because you can't burn fat if insulin is too high... 

Item 1) Elevated ketone bodies in newborns & infants?

 Item 1) Elevated ketone bodies in newborns & infants?

The video is about 20 minutes long and since it also confirms what I have been thinking on stuff like the illness of Alzheimer (an energy problem for the brain related to the daily food we eat). Here is a link: 

What can Baby Brains tell us about Alzheimer's? (Type 3 Diabetes)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yooNuOKsa1Q 

For me it is still relatively new to know that so many animals have also trouble going into a fat burning mode too. But stuff like dolphins, only when their blood sugar is double compared to humans, they too piss out the excess of unburned blood sugar. That means dolphins run much more on sugar (despite they don't eat much carbs) then you would think. By the way, dolphins are of interest because they too can get Alzheimer.  

Longlivety is also important, both humans and dolphins can get relatively old. 

But back to the babies, what can we learn from baby brains? 

Likely a lot more then the picture below. If I am correct, on the vertical axis you see one of the ketone body products that arise from burning fats. It looks like newborns are awash in it... 

 

The video contains more interesting stuff like the things that are needed to clean up the brain from those beta-amyloid plagues also take away the hormone insulin. As thus suggesting constant fighting all that insulin is not a battle the brain can win.  

Ok, let's leave it with that. Till updates. 

 

(29 Nov 2018) A few days back the Perimeter Institute had the best visualization out there when it comes to the warming of the atmosphere. It is weird to observe that the average USA republican voter is just too stupid to understand the video. The USA has come a long way but now their life expectancy is shrinking just like I estimated years ago so the future is bright as far as I am concerned...

Item 1) USA republicans too stoopid to understand this video...;)

 Item 1) USA republicans too stoopid to understand this video...;)

The religious right in the USA are mostly voting for republicans and those people are hardcore stupid. But only a couple of years back it was also among republicans more or less accepted that the changing composition of the earth atmosphere was the driving force behind the climate change. 

But the last years it has turned the other way and now we have that piece of shit in the White House that climate change is a Chinese conspiracy for making the US economy weaker... A couple of days back some reasonable leftovers of the former US government brought out a report estimating possible future economical damage related to the changing climate. 

The White House shitheads would not have that name if they not rebuked and denied a report written by other parts of their very own government. It was not translated from the Chinese language, no it was actually written by Americans... 

__________ 

The video is a perfect visualization, my compliments go to the people who made it. All you need is an infrared camera and those four gasses they use. For a university these are just common things. 

Now in the video you see that some gasses block the infrared radiation. For shit headed US republicans: infrared radiation is heat radiation... 

Here is the video, click on the picture: 

 

Link:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaY36yxFb1o

It has to be remarked that the blocking by the greenhouse gasses in general means two things: 

1) The greenhouse gasses get heated by the infrared radiation, or
2) The greenhouse gasses mirror the infrared radiation back to earth. 

Either way it is not a good thing... Till updates. 

 

(24 Nov 2018) This update is about food, a bit more precise as why carbs and sweet things stops the fat burning in your body. After all the obesity crisis is not caused by people eating too much or exercise too little. Fat gain and loss is a process strongly ruled by hormones, in most cases it is just too high levels of the insulin hormone but other hormones can disrupt your metabolism too. 

At the other side of the planet, to be precise in down under Australia, there is that collection of medics doing more or less the right thing and they try to understand how all that fat accumulation and loss actually works. 

If only the physics professors would do the same thing with electron spin, I would be in paradise... But anyway, let's start with the only item of the day: 

Item 1) Dr. Paul Mason - 'Low Carb from a Doctor's perspective'.

 Item 1) Dr. Paul Mason - 'Low Carb from a Doctor's perspective'.

Today I observed another idiot from the Dutch Foodcenter (Het Voedingscentrum) that you should eat bread and carbs (carbs are those foods that fall apart in simple sugars very fast). As usual 'the brain runs on glucose' was one of the standard reasons given to eat that stuff. 

The fact that in your blood only about 5 gram of glucose is transported all of the time and that your body can easily make glucose for itself is always neglected by the Dutch Foodcenter people. 

So eating a few slices of bread or consuming a few pancakes releases a whole lot of simple sugars like glucose. High blood levels of glucose are so toxic to the body that all fat burning stops and your body deals with the elevated blood sugar levels by turning it into fat. (Also other things like glycogen in your muscle tissue but all that toxic sugar must be absorbed as fast as possible and that is where the mighty hormone insulin comes in: it orders you body cells to take up glucose and process it.) 

If you are a young male and rather muscular, it might very well be that if you binge on like say 10 banana's and after one hour you measure your blood sugar levels, they might be fine... That only means that this young muscular human male can absorb a lot of sugar in a short time span. But the older you get, the more this capability gets lost.

Therefore I always apply the simple rule of thumb that says as you get older you should eat less and less carbs. Or, if you are in your twenties: no more sugar in coffee and tea. But for every body it is different, females can have those thyroid problems and that is a mighty hormone too.   

Here is the very good video, about half an hour long, that is a far better perspective on food as you compare that to the miserable and life shortening stupid food advices of the Dutch Foodcenter. 

The screenshot was taken at 10.30 minutes where Paul Mason shown the current understanding of releasing all that energy stored in you body fat: 

 

Ok, let's leave it with that. Till updates. 

 

(21 Nov 2018) Let's be cool not post 10 video's of people claiming quantum computers can work because of 'Schrödingers cat'. Likely you know this thought experiment; a cat is placed inside a box and there is some quantum mechanism like the radioactive decay of one atom that triggers misery for the cat and the cat will die.  

Item 1) On the nonsense of Schrödinger's cat & quantum computing.

 Item 1) On the nonsense of Schrödinger's cat & quantum computing.

According to a lot of people, a cat as in the Schrödinger thought experiment can be in a superposition of being dead and alive. This all depends on the atomic state of just one atom that has decayed or not. The superposition of the dead and alive status of the cat is a direct consequence of the unobserved atom whose state (radioactive decay yes or no) is not measured. 

But a lot of people find this very strange, can you be in a superposition of being dead and alive at the same time. Ok ok, sometimes when I look in the mirror it looks that way. But serious: If you are alive today that means you have been alive all days of your entire life. And once you are dead, the state doesn't change either. It is not that a few days later you flip back to life (unless you are the original Jesus of course).

You know the lesson from the Schrödinger thought experiment is very simple:

If macroscopic things like cats cannot be in a superposition of being dead and alive at the same time, the same goes for quantum particles like radioactive nuclei.  

You also never hear professional physics professors talk like this:

We now have a quantum computer where the qbits are in a superposition of being an uranium atom and a helium atom. Most physics professors think that is unwise in case they want to promote their own career & the precious ego that comes along with that.

But when it comes to electron spin all of a sudden it can be in a superposition and as such a whole of quantum computer stuff is based on that. I don't think it is gonna work, only qbits that truly behave as waves can be placed into superposition.  

 

Ok, let's leave the cat nonsense with that. Till updates my dear reader. 

 

(19 Nov 2018) It was a bit of searching but I found a nice video about the most weird stuff the British press told their local audience. A few of the most weird titles of 'news reports' were:  

EU forces British cows to wear nappies, the Daily Mail. (At 9:30 minutes)
EU to ban high heels for hairdressers, the Daily Telegraph. (At 12:45 minutes) 
EU says pets must be pressured cooked after death, the Sunday Telegraph  (At 15:10)
And so on and so on.

Item 1) Why are the British always so emotional about the EU?

 Item 1) Why are the British always so emotional about the EU?

There is constantly all that emotion going round like 'The EU has to set an example so no other nation will dare to leave the EU'. This is a non rational view but an emotional driven take on the things Europe does.

Let me say it one more time because the British are just like the physics professors when I talk of electron spin, they will not react on the next words: 

The British can't get a deal that is better compared to what we have amongst ourselves. 

That is the basic European line, it is reasonable because why give outgoing countries unreasonable benefits? But over the decades I myself have observed that the British have this 'penny in must be a penny out' attitude going back to their iron lady Tatcher. And combined with all that weird stuff the UK people think about Europe, for myself speaking I am glad we have those weirdo's out. 

And as far as I am concerned, it might cost a penny or two. 

__________ 

But let me keep this update as short as possible: Only about 4 weeks down the time line the British parliament will vote upon the deal. So we must wait in order to observe a hard Brexit yes or no. 

Needless to remark, since I predicted a hard Brexit it will be highly emotional for me if that does not happen. 

After all if your future is that of evil Eurocrats that force you to pressure cook your pet after death, you better go for a hard Brexit. 

Here is the youtube link: 

Why Do British People Think The EU Is Their Enemy?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5Ve7kbLoAo 

Ok, let's leave it with that. Have a nice Brexit or try to get one. 

 

(16 Nov 2018) Wow, all of a sudden there is a Brexit deal on the table. I had not expected it that fast so it is clear Europe wants to minimize the damage that the British are inflicting on our common economy. But a few updates back when a possible deal looked far beyond the horizon I informed you that from all European parliaments the parliament where a deal would possibly fail is the British parliament.

Since it is well known that I do not like it when my estimations fail, I 'hope' for a fail in the British parliament. I know a hard Brexit will cause a lot of economical pain, my own country too has a lot of trade with the UK. But there are so many brexiteers in the UK that want out whatever what and that is an emotional process that likely just has to run it's course. 

I have talked about the weirdo Boris Johnson before, but in the UK they also have more advanced form of weirdo's and one of them is Jacob Rees-Mogg. The guy got my attention when he more or less between nose and lips remarked that tax cuts might be good because 'just like in the USA' that generates economical growth.  

Yeah year my dear Jacob, why don't you ask all those kids in Greece living below the poverty line how fantastic it is when the government goes on a debt hugging spree... 

In Italy they more or less have the same problem: Government debt is already running at something like 130% of the GDP and 'just a bit more borrowing' will magically bring down the 130% because of the extra economical growth. 

When the lunatics run the asylum you can observe all kinds of weird logic. But on the other hand I would like to remark it is very charming that the Italian government wants to put in place that so called basic income. I like that a lot but when your country is debt riddled to the tune of 130% I am sorry to inform the Italians that it is just a dream for the time being.

But as long as there are weirdo's willing to buy Italian government debt, they can dream on. Stability pact? Is that some kind of pizza will the Italians ask. 

__________ 

After so much politics, just one small item for today: 

Item 1) Two new posts on 4D complex numbers on the other website.

 Item 1) Two new posts on 4D complex numbers on the other website.

Diagonal stuff. Finally I did put all those matrix representations of four dimensional complex numbers in diagonal form. That was nice to do and in the first post I used it to calculate the most simple matrix representation possible: 

The matrix of the very first imaginary unit l in the 40 complex number space. 

And in the second post I used the same technique to calculate the matrix representation of the number tau. And that is a fucking hard calculation to understand. People like Jacob Rees-Mogg easily need a few billion years for that before they understand it's details. Hey Jacob, how is your Brexit going?

But let me act as an adult and leave all that political stuff and end this update with a small screen shot of the last 4D complex number post:

 

So there are many ways to calculate the 4D number tau (complex version of course) but what is the British parliament going to do to my reputation? 

If they are reasonable, they will go for the hard Brexit. 

Let's leave it with that. Till updates my dear reader & thanks for your attention. 

 

(07 Nov 2018) Ok ok, it is about high time to update the files on magnetism as they are found on this website. For a long time I want to attack those so called Penning traps as they were used in the 'most significant physics experiment' in measuring the magnetic dipole moment of the electron in about 12 decimal places correct...

But a few days back I looked at that great video about the origins of precision inside the fine art of metals and it seems there is a giant force between two metal blocks that have perfectly flat surfaces... 

So that is Reason 67: Perfect flat metal pieces stick together like very strong magnets.    

It brings nicely together what I have been thinking about magnetic domains and beautiful history on how to be more precise & use that in the industrial production of precision metal things. End of this update.  

(03 Nov 2018) One of the weirdest videos I saw in the last weeks was from some 'economic adviser' to the US prez donald trump, I can't find the video back but they were talking about the ballooning US Federal debt.  

And I really had to laugh when this adviser totally claimed that the tax cuts would pay for themselves... These guys really think that it is going to 'pay for itself'. 

Item 1) US tax cuts and economical growth.

 Item 1) US tax cuts and economical growth.

Do those weirdo's in the White House really think that tax cuts pay for themselves? 

Sometimes it makes sense for tax cuts, but that meets a long list of boundary conditions that must be there will it work. For example after the financial crisis from a decade back banks borrowed much less money out because they needed giant amounts of money to repair their over inflated balances. So bank loans were running low. 

Furthermore for the entire economy access to new bonds issued or offering more stocks to be sold must also heavily restricted and must have been for a number of years... 

All in all the situation must be so bad that almost all companies just could not expand because they had no access to capital. Also profit margins of companies must be under heavy repression from evil government tax collectors, so the very own profits of the average company is also not enough to make more investments...

Ok, if the above is true in some economy, you could do a bit of experimenting with lowering taxes. And if that brings room for the hard needed investments, it might work.

In my view this will not happen because for an economy of USA size, for yearly tax cuts in the order of one trillion the economy needs to expand by something like 7 trillion US$.

I don't think that is going to happen, given the fact that the average life span of the population is in decline for some time now, the economy is not very vibrant. It is just a bunch of obese folks chasing the next hamburger.

As far as I understand reality, the honorable US prez donald trump has never tried to read the so called Z1 release from the USA Federal Reserve. If he did and indeed he was that smart as he thinks he is, can you see the incoming fun? 

You can find the Federal Reserve Z1 release by clicking on the next picture, please remark that 'seasonally adjusted annual numbers' only means the stuff is multiplied by 4 & has some statistical seasonal adjustment on it. For the rest the next picture is more or less what is actually borrowed in that quarter if you divide it by 4. 

 

I hope it was boring enough, these tax cuts will not pay for themselves because the right economical conditions are not met. There is no lack of investment capital on a nation wide basis... Till updates.  

 

(19 Oct 2018) A nice football match between the Dutch & the Germans, Brexit and will US tax cuts will pay for themselves? (On 20 Oct I added item 4.)

Item 1) Wow, that was great to watch! 
Item 2) Brexit.
Item 3) US tax cuts and economical growth.
Item 4) Teaser picture for a new Cauchy integral representation on 4D.

 Item 1) Wow, that was great to watch! 

Sometime this week I wanted to put out my television but to my surprise a football match was just starting. Holy shit, it was against Germany. I had no clue that such a game was on. 

But I had only time for five minutes and I had to go.

Five minutes before the end I was back, instantly put on the television and I watched those last five minutes and the three minutes of extra time. 

Wow, two great goals & this time we had a big win... 

It is tempting to make a few jokes about it, but better not do that because that maximizes the outcome of future matches. At last, the Dutch should a bit more humble in general when it comes to football matches with Germany. With some simple statistical order laws in your hand and given the population sizes of Germany and us (about 82 million Germans versus about 17 million Dutch), most of the time the Germans will win.

I hope you don't get pessimistic from those words.

Item 2) Brexit.

Like expected the latest round of Brexit talks also failed. May be that is a good thing because even a deal was reached it has to pass all of the 28 parliaments that are the basic democratic building blocks of our European democracy. 

The weird thing is that any deal most likely would not pass that parliament somewhere in the UK. Those hard brexiteers like the weirdo Boris Johnson just want to be 'free' and they want it at all costs whatsoever. 

So I will not change my view on this: 

Just prepare for a hard Brexit and mop up the damage later. 

 

Item 3) US tax cuts and economical growth.

US federal deficits are rising although the latest figures are still tame, about 779 billion US$ for 2018. Ok, if you calculate it back to debt growth per capita US citizen per day it is a crazy number but anyway it is still 'tame'. 

For simplicity let's assume the US taxes about 1/7 th of the GDP every year. Now you cut taxes by 1 trillion a year because 'tax cuts pay for themselves'. How much does the economy need to grow to make up for the cut taxes? 

Very simple: about 7 trillion more GDP will generate 1 trillion of extra tax revenue. 

The USA GDP is at best 20 trillion a year and a 7 trillion expansion is about 35% larger. At a yearly growth of the US GDP of about 4% this will take about 8 years to achieve. 

In my view this will not happen.

Item 4) Teaser picture for a new Cauchy integral representation on 4D. 

Last week I published a new Cauchy integral representation for the complex 4D numbers. For myself speaking I am very pleased with it because I found a way so that you can prove it very easy for real valued polynomials.

So no difficult stuff, just boring polynomials like f(x) = x^2 + 1.

As a matter of fact, the Cauchy integral representation for the complex plane is already a bit beast if you see it for the first time. So on the 4D space of complex numbers it is not going to be more easy or so...

I have now done zero math in the last 8  days since publication, that usually is a sign of begin satisfied. After all you cannot fire a cannon of such size every day...

It is twelve pictures long, I did my best to keep it short but you know it is the Cauchy integral representation so likely it is hard anyway.

 

Let's leave it with that, have a prosit or a brexit & see you around. 

 

(29 Sept 2018) Yesterday I found a nice video from the Royal Institution so without making Brexit jokes like 'Hey RI how is your Brexit going?' let's take a look at that because it contains a lot of thought provoking stuff.

I choose the title of today's item as the title from the video. For me that is funny because I think electrons cannot be in a super position of two spin states. Only things that behave as waves can be super imposed and my version of electron spin is not a wave but a charge.

And if in the future all attempts to making quantum computers based on the idea that electrons can be in a super position of the magnetic electron spin all will have failed, the title will also apply to all those who believed in the super position of electron spin.  

Item 1) Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Quantum Physics is Different. 

 Item 1) Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Quantum Physics is Different. 

In the video you see Philip Ball, a good lecturer by the way, and let me start with a tiny bit of criticism about how to tell an audience what electron spin is. 

The most horrible way is explaining electron spin like the earth is spinning while it also revolves around the sun. Now luckily Philip doesn't do that (otherwise I would have never selected the video of course) but at about 11.30 minutes all of a sudden electron spin comes out of the monkey sleeve. 

And spin is up or down. 

Why is it not left -right? When the talk is about 'up' or 'down', my dear Philip, you should always say that this is against an applied external vertical magnetic field.  

And when electron spin is up the tiny compass needle that the electron is, is aligned with the magnetic field. And spin down means going against the magnetic field.

In the beginning when I started studying this magnetic stuff, it took a relatively long time to figure that out: Electron spin up or down is ALWAYS understood against a vertical applied magnetic field... 

After having said that mild criticism the video has a funny start with a guy that really never understood electron spin. His name is Richard Feynman, he was a relatively smart guy but if you hear his ramblings about positrons going back in time you also know he has some problems...  

This is the guy that refused to understand electron spin, may be he had the brains to understand electron spin but he just didn't do it.   

 

Before we go to the beef of the video, let me first give you a link to the video and take your time to make it to the 32-th minute. 

Here is the link: 

Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Quantum Physics is Different
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7v5NtV8v6I

You know, inside physics there is also all that talk like quantum information cannot be destroyed. Or it never gets lost, or there is conservation of quantum information. Or the universe is just a 2D hologram of quantum information. This 2D hologram is on the outside of the universe. We are living in a simulation & I can prove that. And a whole lot more of that utter nonsense that goes for 'science' at a lot of universities.

If true that quantum information cannot be destroyed and as such you could build a quantum computer that never looses information, would that be possible? 

Here is the screenshot from 32.03 minutes, it is just some thinking about rotating the so called 'pure states' of the quantum computer: 

 

At 33.03 it is explained that if we can flip electron spin in a continuous manner we live in a quantum world but if electron spin can only flip from up to down, or the other way around,  we live in a classical world.

What to think of that?

After all the standard model of physics says electron spin is a magnetic dipole and as such you can view it as a vector, so for them it is more or less 'logical' that you can push a vector from pointing one way into another way.

My view is electrons carry magnetic charge but that also opens many cans of worms (and those are my problems, not those of Mr. Feynman). For example: if photons can flip electron spin, thus the magnetic charge gets replaced by the opposite charge. In that case photons should also carry magnetic charge around...

And I just don't know. It is a charming idea but also very strange because as far as I know light and other em radiation is not influenced by magnetic (or electric) fields.

As a matter of fact, I have no clue what a photon actually is. 

So, that is one of my tiny problems... 

Ok, let's leave it with that. 

Till updates. 

 

(25 Sept 2018) A short item about the Wendelstein X-7 stellarator fusion reactor. 

Item 1) The stellarator ain't dead after 26 seconds of operating.

 Item 1) The stellarator ain't dead after 26 seconds of operating.

After my humble opinion all nuclear fusion attempts like the tokamak or stellarator concepts will fail big time because the electrons get go much accelerated by the very magnetic field that is supposed to contain those very plasma electrons. 

Now back in the time, the Chinese started bragging that they will just turn on one of those machines and watch what is going to happen. Of course I was highly exited how this would end but there was just no significant news. 

The best I could find that 'It was a wild ride'. 

If memory serves, it was about 104 or 103 seconds of turning the machine on. 

So rather likely the Chinese experience was not a great success. Now back to the present; this summer the Wendelstein X-7 stellarator from the Max Planck institute got to a respectable 26 seconds.

I guess I will wait another few years before the Wendelstein X-7 thing blows up because of the production of all those relativistic electrons... 

Source:

Wendelstein 7-X achieves world record
http://www.ipp.mpg.de/4413312/04_18  

Let me close with a cute picture where, according to the standard model of physics, it is impossible to get a lot of relativistic accelerated electrons:

 

That was it for today, till updates. 

 

(23 Sept 2018) The Salzburg meeting of EU leaders with the UK pm failed, just a few comments from my side because all of a sudden we are now 'EU rats'.

In the second item a bit more experimental evidence that the stronger a magnetic field is, the more the electrons get accelerated (that is both attracted and repelled). 

Item 1) And now we are EU rats...
Item 2) Stronger magnetic fields give more electron acceleration.

 Item 1) And now we are EU rats...

The Brexit thing is a horrible complicated thing, it can in potential disrupt things like the supply chain in industry, all those things in the financial sector that are not understood, must Ireland have a hard border yes or no and so on and so on. 

The European position is relatively simple: 

The UK will not get a better deal than what we have amongst ourself. 

That is a reasonable position, why should the UK get a better deal compared to other European nations? One of the problems on the UK side is that they view all payments to and from the European institutions with a pair of 'pennies in = pennies out' kind of view. During the referendum campaign that was a big point, but why was the UK a net payer to the EU?
That was because their economy did relatively better, so all those years they had nothing to complain about you might think.  

As a comparison, I am a Dutch citizen and I even do not know if the Dutch are net payers or receivers when it comes to European stuff. We have a large agriculture sector so it could be we are net receivers.  

But I don't know and I don't care; I am glad we are part of the European Union because that is about the best thing ever for our economy... The British are very different, there is substantial non solidarity with the European cause decade in decade out. From Tatcher with her 'We want our money back' to present day complete incompetent political leaders like Boris Johnson.

In my view I am now thinking a hard Brexit might be the best and we mop up the damage later...

For what it is worth, after all it from a paper named The Sun so it is a lot of emotion and low on the cognitive parts of the brain, but it is a funny read because we are now dirty rats instead of just rats...

EU DIRTY RATS The Sun Says we can’t wait to free ourselves of the two-bit mobsters who run the European Union
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/7309816/the-sun-says-eu-brexit-mobsters/

Well my dear Sun intellectuals? What's holding you back? It's called a hard Brexit but likely once more the cowards from the UK won't do that because they lack bravery. 

Let's leave it with that. 

 Item 2) Stronger magnetic fields give more electron acceleration.

Between two blocks of buildings where I live, often rough garbage like furniture and bikes & all that stuff that does not get collected via the standard household garbage removal. And I found a magnetron over there, it was only 10 minutes of time of removing the magnets and putting the magnetron together and placing it back at the illegal dumped garbage. 

Sometimes life is funny because:
1) You first steal a magnetron from a small pile of garbage, after that
2) You take ownership of the two magnets you want and after that
3) You unsteal the magnetron by placing it back and by that
4) I am dumping illegal garbage myself... 

Sometimes it is funny to break the law. 

This afternoon I made a few photo's outside in my small garden but to my surprise the photo's were all rather strange; giant black spots. It was easy to understand why: the camera automatically adjust for the amount of light it receives and as such the shutter time was so short that I was photographing of a timescale related to the frames per second rate... 

Anyway, today's simple experiment confirms that the stronger the magnetic field, the bigger the dark ring gets where no electrons land on the television screen.

It is a bit hard to see because on the two photo's in the picture I hold the camera at different distances but with the four magnetron magnets the radius of the ring is about 3 mm larger. Also with my own eyes I can see that the inner circle of electrons that get attracted to the magnet get a bit smaller indicating that they undergo more acceleration towards the magnets.

Here is how it looks, the radius is about 3mm do the diameter is about 6mm but this small difference is a bit hard to see:  

 

Now according to one of the details in the standard model of physics, electrons can move freely along the magnetic field lines but can't travel in between magnetic field lines. 

I am too lazy to post all kinds of video's about that, but in the previous post I found that German science journalist and he repeated it more than one time: 

Die elektronen können nur freilich bewegen entlang die magnetischen feldlinien und nicht senkrecht darauf. 

Well Harald Lesch, that is very interesting but my simple 12 € television experiment shows that the electrons indeed move 'senkrecht' (perpendicular) to the applied magnetic field.

Ok, let's leave it with that. Ein prosit to den Deutchen & the UK folks can try to lick the ass of donald trump and get nice trade deals with their own very special partner.

Till updates.  

 

(18 Sept 2018) Two items for today's update: 

Item 1) Cute factorization of a 4D determinant crafted.
Item 2) Explaining why the Wendelstein X-7 fusion reactor will fail too.

 Item 1) Cute factorization of a 4D determinant crafted.

Over on the other website (that's 3Dcomplexnumbers.net of course) about six days ago I posted a possible way of factorizing those matrix representations you encounter in the 4D complex number system. 

The importance lies in the fact this is a very general method where you can avoid writing out the determinant and after that try to factorize it. With this method you simple calculate all the factors of the determinant, these factors are the eigenvalue functions. You can find that stuff for any dimension if needed. 

Anyway, I multiplied all of the four factors against each other in order to calculate the determinant. And until the present day I never wrote out the determinant of the matrix M(Z) you see in the picture below using traditional methods like using those matrix minors. 

Click on the picture to read the post. 

 

A lot of those smart people known as the professional math professors are fond of the so called 4D quarternions. But how much of them have calculated the determinant of the matrix representations of quaternions? 

May be a few but I guess the number is more or less zero professors who did that for the right reasons. One right reason is of course if length is preserved just like in the complex plane.

__________ 

So far for this item. 

 Item 2) Explaining why the Wendelstein X-7 fusion reactor will fail too.

If electrons get accelerated big time along the field lines of magnetic fields compared to the behavior of protons and isotopes like deuterium, it is impossible to get a long term stable burning plasma in either the tokamak or stellarator configurations like the German Wendelstein X-7 fusion reactor.

It's very simple: The longer such a torodial magnetic field is applied to keep the plasma contained, the more electrons will get very relativistic.  

As I understand reality right now, the German Wendelstein engineers also have tools for measuring the turbulence of the plasma.  

In my view, electrons carry magnetic charge beside their electrical charge and as such it might be expected they will get accelerated as long as the fusion machine is turned on.  

Because electrons carry one of two types magnetic charge, turbulence is expected to rise the longer the fusion machine is turned on. And also have more and more damage to the plasma chamber walls because of increasing relativistic collisions.

In my view it will never work. 

__________ 

In Germany a lot of honorable people like the university people of the Max Planck institute are working hard to make nuclear fusion work. 

One of these honorable people is Prof. Dr. Hartmut Zohm. 

He absolutely has no clue if electrons get accelerated yes or no by magnetic fields, likely he is very good at doing the blah blah thing when it comes to the famous Stern Gerlach experiment. An non constant magnetic field can blah blah accelerate electrons and now we understand the Stern Gerlach experiment. 

We only need a bit more money for grund forschung so within 20 years we will have commorcial nuclear fusion...

He is good at this kind of blah blah but believe me at the Max Planck institute they have never studied the subject of electron acceleration by magnetic fields... 

They too are scientists of the blah blah type.

Here is a video of the honorable Zohm:

Fusionsforschung • Grundlagen & Stand 2018 (1/2) • 
Live im Hörsaal | Hartmut Zohm
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45vAFnGKx0M

So mein lieben Deutchen: Ein prosit und gutes glück mit fusion forschung...

Added on 20 Sept 2018: After a bit of searching because I lost the name of that scientific journalist (Harald Lesch) I found back that video where this Max-Planck guy claims it is about 20 years before we have commercial nuclear fusion. The video is in the German sprache but relatively soon the Max-Plank Institute guy remarks that we will have commercial nuclear fusion within 20 years... 

Harald Lesch & Hartmut Zohm zur Fusionsforschung
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIIfR665CdU 

Comment: Present day ideas about nuclear fusion rest on the standard model that says electrons are magnetic dipoles and as such they are not accelerated very much by magnetic fields.
If I can do an experiment with a 12 € television and 50 € of strong neodymium magnets, the Max-Planck Institute could do similar experiments in a university setting for about 1 to 10 million €.

That is very cheap for a beautiful physics result: Each and every electron is a magnetic monopole.

But it is not going to happen this academic year, I selected this video because you can see that the Max-Planck Institude guy is just another severe case of the psychological condition known as the 'Anne van Streun syndrome'. 

If a university person has Anne van Streun syndrome, only the ego matters.
If something not flatters the ego of that university person, nothing happens.   

And that my dear reader is 'scientific progress', it costs a fucking load of tax payer money and it only makes progress if the ego's of those 'professional scientists' are praised like they are some form of donald trump... 

Till updates my dear reader.  

 

(05 Sept 2018) It has been a long time since I wrote something about the illness named Alzheimer. Back in the time I found that work of an American female, I lost her name, but she claimed that Alzheimer is caused by insulin resistance in the brain.

The human brain can produce insulin for itself and as such can work independently of the rest of the body for glucose intake but if the brain can develop insulin resistance that also explains as why slim people get Alzheimer. You don't have to be an obese fatbag for developing Alzheimer. 

Anyway all those years I thought that animals never developed Alzheimer while the human Alzheimer is mostly caused by the fact if you eat a carb based diet it is difficult for the body to burn fat. That is the root cause for obesity anyway: you can't burn the fat, either dietary fat or body fat... 

About half a year ago I found out that dolphins can develop Alzheimer, that was a nasty blow to my ideas about how Alzheimer develops. My idea was that because of the insulin resistance it is mainly an energy problem for the brain; the fat doesn't get burned and it covers the insulin receptors and the brain cells cannot take glucose in while ketone bodies are never produced. 

It all is a bit more nuanced; dolphins unlike humans cannot form ketone bodies in the first place... That is item 1 for today. 

In item 2 we will take a look at what I call the 'Anne van Streun syndrome' that explains why scientific development as done by university people always goes so slow slow slow. 

Item 1) The dolphin diet.
Item 2) Anne van Streun syndrome in university people.

 Item 1) The dolphin diet. 

Dolphins eat a lot of fish and evidently little carbohydrates, so unlike humans they don't eat food that falls instantly apart in simple sugars like bread & the likes. 

When I found out that dolphins also could get forms of dementia, it was stressed out that dolphins just like humans have large brains and become relatively old compared to other animals. 

So the fact dolphins get it too looked like a giant blow to my hypothesis of an energy problem in the brain related to the brain lacking energy because of the local insulin resistance. 

For humans the ketone bodies are an important fuel for our brain, it is often rumored that the brain prefers glucose but I am not convinced by that. Also your own body can easily make glucose when needed, after all it is a relatively simple molecule. 

If dolphins are fasted for 72 hours they never go into ketosis, this suggests that if dolphins burn fat they likely turn it into glucose. 

So although dolphins eat a natural diet while in the wild, it is still very much possible they get Alzheimer or other brain energy problems altogether. 

And what humans concern: My original idea is still standing. When people age they should eat less and less carbs or to put it simple: eat in such a way your blood sugar does not spike. May be, when you are young, you can eat up to 10 bananas and just one hour later your blood sugar levels are ok. That only means your body can store a lot of sugar fast in the form of body fat, but if you age stuff gets harder.

__________ 

Lately I observed an interview with Bill Gates who said a few millions would go to research about Alzheimer in general also a bit of looking at the energy function of human brain tissue over the lifespan of the individual.  

So that is a good thing. But the human body is very complicated. If I compare the best of my math works to a simple molecule like glucose, my own body can make all these huge and complicated proteins that my brain will never understand...

 

Item 2) Anne van Streun syndrome in university people.

Now why does scientific progress like research into Alzheimer as an energy problem of the brain or a full century of idiot stuff related to electron spin go so slow? 

After all the universities burn a lot of tax payer money and why does it all go so slow? 

For a large part it is because universities are advanced forms of a bunch of monkeys on a rock. Most of us understand that if you look at a collection of monkeys on a rock there is a whole lot of stuff going on and only a tiny bit of cognitive growth aka science.

A long time ago I once went to the local university, math department to meet with Anne van Streun. Mr. van Streun was into didactics or the fine art of how to teach math to teens and young adults. It was over two decades ago so I really do not remember anymore what my actual proposal was, but I remember after the small talk that I put down my proposal. And Anne thought about it for a full second. Suddenly as stuck by a bee he sat up and informed me:

But in that case it would look as if I would work for you

And that my dear reader is one of the ways tax payer goes wasted: 

Regardless of the merits of the proposal, within one second of time it was shot out of the sky because 'that would look as if I was working for you'. 

It was just one of the reasons I decided never to get a PhD in math, these people are not into science but only in advanced games as who is working for who & all the crazy stuff they have over there in crazyland.  

Ok, that was it for today. Till updates. 

 

(28 Aug 2018) A short update from  the previous update from 20 Aug; it was better to add a few more screen shots to that previous update so here we go: 

Item 1) Electrons are infinitely small and process in magnetic fields?

 Item 1) Electrons are infinitely small and process in magnetic fields?

Let's keep this short and simple: 

In the previous post I showed you that PBS video on 'the most reliable relation between physical theory and experiment'. It is no secret I disagree with that all because I think electrons have magnetic charge and that the so called magnetic dipole of an electron is more a fantasy based in the Gauss law on magnetism.

At 3:57 the video guy claims electrons are point particles while
at 10:51 the electrons precess because of a magnetic field. 

The last is known as Larmor precession. Here is a picture of how this precession should look when it comes to the electron being a magnetic dipole: 

 

The tiny problem with this detail is as next: 

The Larmor precession is a frequency of em-radiation.
But if the electron only wiggles around on the spot while it has not much of a radius, why should it emit photons with a particular frequency? 

As far as I know reality, electrons emit photons when the electrons are accelerated.
It is known as brems strahlung and not 'wiggle wiggle radiation'. 

Ok, that was it. Till updates. 

 

20 Aug 2018) I finished Reason number 66 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles while as an antidote to that I post a link to a Youtube video about the fantastic coupling there is inside physics between the theoretical and experimental measuring of the electron magnetic dipole moment.

So one item with two links in it. 

Item 1) Reason 66 posted + the official electron magnetic dipole moment.

 Item 1) Reason 66 posted + the official electron magnetic dipole moment.

Ok, with my simple experimental setup with the 12 € old television and a 50 € stack of those modern strong neodymium magnets it is obvious the electrons get accelerated big time.  

If you see it for the first time it is a mind boggling number while it is only some conservative lower bound on the actual electron acceleration. 

But there is no arguing with reality: Every body can repeat the simple experiment and observe the black spot on the screen where no electrons land. Remark the speed of the electrons in the electron beam is about 120 thousand km/sec so over one third of the speed of light. 

That is why you need these crazy acceleration numbers in order to get a black spot on the screen...  If you click on the picture you land at reason 66:

 

It's still mind boggling: As a number the electron acceleration is over 8 million times the speed of light (as a number of course). 

As an antidote to that we have more mind boggling stuff: The official version of electron spin, both theory and experiment. It is in this 16 min video: 

Quantum Theory's Most Incredible Prediction | Space Time
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UwigY4SjKY 

Now some time back I explained to you as why I will not try to write an 'official publication' when it comes to the impossibility of electrons being magnetic dipoles. And at the time I would like to give you some examples of people that would instantly trash my 'professional article'.

This person from PBS space time has all it takes to be the arrogant peer reviewer that would trash my article within five minutes, but at the time I decided to skip this all because why make it so personal like monkeys on a rock? 

After all the idea about electron spin is wrong, it has nothing to do with individual people... But four days back this guy comes out with another video of blah blah blah see how good we are because we are good 12 places behind the decimal point & more of that blah blah blah. 

But I have to remark; Seldom have I seen a tshirt so perfect for the occasion where the very best of physics is praised while the tshirt reads: Lehman.  

That is mind boggling too, but may be it has nothing to do with the math of Lehman Brothers but is it Lehman bakery from around the corner.  

 

That was it but again, let's not make it personal because we have in this update a giant electron acceleration versus the official electron g factor.

What more do you want? Ok ok, may be an experimental result that indeed says electrons are magnetic dipoles. Till updates.  

 

(14 Aug 2018) Oh oh politics at it's most stupid point is those Omarosa tapes from places like the situation room inside the US White House... 

I enjoy this tremendously because this is what can happen if you vote a person like donald trump that has clearly all kinds of mental issues to the presidency. And the funny thing is of course that in the past the honorable donald trump himself has said that 'the fish rots from the head' (when talking about Obama of course).  

But this update is not upon politics but a shorty on magnetism and some simple calculations around that old television photo. 

Item 1) Side-way acceleration = 8 million times the speed of light? YEP!

 Item 1) Side-way acceleration = 8 million times the speed of light? YEP!

Here is that old picture again from 14 Jan 2016: 

 

You see that there is a dark ring where no electrons land on the screen. 

Under the assumption the electron cannons in my old television set work at an electric potential of 40 thousand Volt, it is not that hard to calculate the electrons go about 120 thousand km/sec or just over one third of the speed of light. 

So you need a huge huge side way acceleration to displace the incoming stream of electrons by at least 0.5 centimeter. If my calculations are correct, I have to comb them trough a bit more because the answer is so bizarre: 

As a number the speed of light is 300 million, we skip the unit m/s.
As a number the estimated side-way acceleration is about 8 million times the speed of light. And that is a number that makes you think... 

It is not forbidden, the giant acceleration only lasts at most 2 nano-seconds and indeed inside Einsteinian mechanics there is nothing that forbids acceleration numbers like this.  

So for the time being this will be the next Reason number 66 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles. 

I took the trouble to make a new photo, now with the stack of magnets in the corner of the television screen. The asymmetric shape you observe cannot be explained by the Lorentz force, but if you use a simple model like electrons carry two different charges of magnetism, this shape looks rather logical. 

Anyway to me it looks logical. Here is the new photo: 

 

As you see there is rather large spot where no electrons land on the television screen. In my view this clearly demonstrates that the electrons get accelerated because they carry magnetic charge. 

End of this update. 

 

(23 July 2018) At the end of last year's summer I more or less thought out a simple model that explains all those solar loops that go between pairs of sun spots. It was vey simple:

If inside the sun plasma starts rotating in a tornado like (or tube like) structure, in a short time it becomes electrically very positive and will create strong magnetic fields that at the surface of the sun looks like a sun spot. 

That was all there was to it but I did not know as why there would be any tornado like or tube like rotation in the sun so I never penned it down until now. 

This update is about reason 65 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles: 

22 July2018: Reason 65: A possible model for solar loops going between two solar spots 

Item 1) On a simple tornado/tube like plasma rotating model.

 Item 1) On a simple tornado/tube like plasma rotating model.

Only about two weeks ago I picked up this model again after finding out that the sun rotates unequal on the various latitudes. At the solar equator it rotates must faster as compared to the polar regions. 

I did not know that last year, but from that rotating differential it is very likely all kinds of rotating tubes will form in the outer layers of the sun. So for the time being I use this rotating difference as the driving force behind the magnetic fields as found in the sun spots. 

At this point in time my simple model only contain words, not important numbers like the acceleration that electrons and protons have under a unit of magnetism of say 1 Tesla or 1 Gauss. 

 

One of the features of my simple model is that it is falsifiable, that means if the simple model is wrong you can prove that. In this case all solar rotating structures like those tube shaped should behave the same.
If you can find only counter example, this whole idea of rotating positively charged plasma can be thrown into the garbage bin...  

Yet I am positive upon future findings in this because one year back I only had some vague notion of spinning plasma and this year we have found a possible driving mechanism while all those details of leading and trailing solar spots nicely fit in with the original idea. After all the period of the magnetism on the sun is 22 years while visible sun spots behave more like an 11 year thing.

Let me show you one of those lovely pictures, often from the ultra-violet part of the em-spectrum, that show the so called solar loops between solar spots: 

 

The sun is a nice thing, you have all that kinetic energy there and magnetism and electricity is a way of transporting energy over longer distances.

Ok, that was reason number 65 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles.
Till updates my dear reader, live well and think well. 

 

(13 July 2018) Oh oh the NATO top this week had the enjoyment of the wisdom of the US POS (= Piece Of Shit). This time the brilliant insight is that neighbor Germany is a slave to Russia because they buy gas from Russia. 

Even the Kremlin thought this was a bridge too far by stating that things like selling gas is more a way of creating a mutual dependence and that is a better representation of reality.  

On the trade war I have only one comment: 
The biggest driver behind the USA trade deficits is, in my view, that the US economy as a whole consumes more than it produces. Historically this could grow this way because the US$ is a little bit overrated (that is artificially strong) because it has world currency reserve status and therefore a lot of US companies could indeed not keep up with the competition abroad.
Instead of innovating faster and harder, like for example Germany, the USA went for the lazy way and sell paper like US treasuries to the Chinese.
That's how we got in this stuff in the first place, putting tariffs on particular goods will not solve the problem of a US population that has to use a dollar that is artificially too high all of the time...  

Oh oh politics, better not think about all those weirdo's out there lately. 

This update is about a much more crazy thing than recent politics and that is a tiny calculation into so called BCS theory that explains super conductivity. 

I post it here because it was already discussed in the pages on magnetics a long time ago, but the simple calculation says the whole theory is rather likely nonsense.

Item 1) BCS theory, Cooper pairs and super conductivity.

 Item 1) BCS theory, Cooper pairs and super conductivity.

In a nutshell BCS theory tries to explain super conductivity via the formation of electron pairs, that sounds 100% reasonable because in my view electron pairs are magnetically neutral and that is an important property because it opens much more of those ballistic channels in a super conducting material. 

But if you zoom in on the details of the BCS theory it is just horrible to the bone, it goes more or less like this: 

1) One electron comes in the grid of positive metal ions.
2) This attracts the positive ions that therefore pull together creating an even stronger positive electrical field that
3) Makes it more likely for another electron to enter and that
4) Is a Cooper pair. 

It is a complete bullshit theory and that can be shown with a very simple calculation: 

Originally back in the year 1911 Heike Kamerlingh Onnes discovered that metals like mercury and lead lost all electrical resistivity when cooled down to extreme low temperatures. Of course it was a fascinating discovery. 

About 50 years later the first 'theoretical explanations' arrived at the scene and that is present day BCS theory.

Let me keep the calculation short and easy to understand: 

The electron enters that lattice of positive ions and as such it feel a force F from those ions because they have positive electrical charge while the electron is negative.
The ions feel the same force. 

Ok, lets say our lone electron makes 4 mercury atoms vibrate.
Will they vibrate a lot inside the ultracold mercury lattice? 

Now the electron has a mass that is about 1830 times as small as the mass of a proton or a neutron. Mercury is number 80 on the list of periodical elements and suppose it has about 80 neutrons also. 

Furthermore suppose our electron moves four of those mercury atoms so that the Cooper pair can be formed.

Do the math: F = ma so the acceleration of the electron is relatively high compared to the four mercury nuclei. The electron must move  4 x 160 x 1830 in mercury mass or over one million time the mass the electron has...   

I do not think that ECB theory is a good explanation, I think it is 100% bullshit.

__________ 

The reason for writing this update is that I viewed that video again where Noble laureate Frank Wilczek unfolds his wisdom on superconductivity. 

Now I do not want to be negative on this Frank guy, he is mild mannered, soft spoken and at least he tries to think a bit around. But BCS theory is plain bullshit and all those people inside physics should calculate a bit more and do a bit less of all that blah blah blah stuff that is going round. 

Just one electron that resonates over one million nuclei mass is just too stupid to talk about. But if you give those people a salary, give them titles like professor and stuff and suddenly all important but elementary calculations are ignored.

Such is life; human science is a social construct one way or the other.

Here is the video that aroused my attention once more to the explanation of super conductivity. Am I looking at science or am I looking at pure 21-th century religion?

 

Youtube source video:  Superconductivity: a far-reaching theory
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0SXx6axMJE

I hope you can find a wiki for yourself if you are interested in these details on BCS theory because I am completely through with all that nonsense that so often lacks a simple experimental or calculational basis.... 

So let me chase happiness and pop up the last pint of the day and enjoy the fact that we humans are only monkeys on a rock.

Till updates. (Updated on 14 July with a video from drPhysicsA and we look at the energy stored in the electron pair). 

May be it is best you first watch the entire video from drPhysicsA because that is rather refreshing after all the talk bordering on religious talk from Frank Wilczek as in the previous video. 

Click on the picture for the video, important detail is found at 6 min 46 seconds where drPhysicsA claims the energy stored in the electron pair is about 10^-3 electron Volts. I think this is very wrong, it has to be much more. 

 

The basic idea as explained in the video is that the super conductivity reaches it critical temperature and above that the electron pairs are destroyed because of the high temperature.

Not only does that contradict the fact that at present day those complicated high temperature super conductors work at much higher temperatures but also the existence of room temperature hydrogen molecules. 

Take two hydrogen atoms, they are both electrically neutral because the electron and the proton cancel each other out. So two hydrogen atoms are never attracted to each other because of electrical forces.

In my view, where electrons carry magnetic charge, only when the two hydrogen atoms have electrons with opposite magnetic charge, they will fuse into molecular hydrogen H2 . From the noble science of chemistry it is known that energy stored inside hydrogen bonds like this is about 4 eV. 

That is about 4000 times as much as drPhysicsA claims that there is in the electron pair. 

In my view, the opposite magnetic charges in an electron pair are stronger compared to the repelling electrical charge the electrons have.

Is there any kind of experimental proof for such a bold claim?

Not that I am aware of, but there is existential proof because if you are a human and you read this, your entire body hangs on the strength of the electron pair. Ok ok there is also ionic bonding but most organic matter hangs together because of electron pairs. 

Ok, that is what I had to say. Let's close this update with the remark that likely the breakdown on super conductivity as drPhysicsA expains it is that even the electron pairs cannot those ballistic pathways of transport anymore.
And as such the super conductivity breaks down when it gets too hot. 

Till updates. 

 

 (06 July 2018) Oops, this website was offline at least one day last weekend. But it's online again so it's fine again; at least I did not forget to pay some bills and got offline via that route... That always makes you feel so dumb and that is not a state of mind that I like. 

In this update I want to reflect on so called scientific progress and in how far this is very much a social thing (like a bunch of monkeys on a rock, that is also a social thing). 

As an example I only want to look at the weird detail that inside mathematics 3D complex numbers are not used at all while I skip the little fact that in physics they do not understand electron spin as a magnetic charge. That is more for those philosophers on physics; why is the electron a magnetic dipole for a full century?  

Item 1) Why are 3D complex numbers not used?

  Item 1) Why are 3D complex numbers not used?

If you do a simple internet search on, lets say 'why do 3D complex numbers not exist?' you get a whole lot of answers.  

If you look at the websites that answer this question, they are all more or less of the type that you as an average citizen can ask and answer questions.

Like for example in the next math exchange dot stuff link: 

Complex number with three dimensions
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/751106/
complex-number-with-3-dimensions 

These kind of questions get answered at such websites feeding the interest of the general public into scientific stuff. Often the answers are really stupid like 'Hey dude that does not work!!!' to more advanced answers that include stuff like the 2, 4, 8 theorem or that theorem of Fröbenius. 

These theorems are very interesting because they include a strategy that cannot work: they try to chase a 3D complex number system where everything outside of the 0 must have an inverse.  

And that is a very stupid demand to begin with...
The theorems might be smartly crafted but it's basic demand was impossible for 3D to start with.

Here is a link to the Fröbenius theorem:

Frobenius theorem (real division algebras)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frobenius_theorem_(real_division_algebras) 

Let's not get into the math of why this approach is stupid because it can easily be shown that there always will be numbers that are not zero but act like projections, destroy dimensions and as such are not invertible. 

__________ 

Now what has this to do with the vague concept of 'progress in science' aka our little 'monkey on a rock problem'? 

Well on such websites serving the questions of the general public at least you get some answer. There are also websites for math professionals and over there the answers are given by those math professionals that are superior to those those who pose the questions... 

On websites like that, for professionals and by professionals, you just cannot find a question like 'Why do 3D complex numbers not exist?' 

So when you are a professional math researcher you look smart if you do not ask such questions.  

And with that you have a probable reason as why entire scientific communities can easily make no progress at all for over a century on particular details like higher dimensional number systems inside the math community or stuff like electron spin inside the physics community. 

And life, life will go on. 
Why do we need scientific progress in the first place? 

Let's leave it with that. Till updates. 

 

(20 & 21 June 2018) What do you think of all those weird reports from the USA about family separation where for example one year old toddlers are taken from their mothers?    

That's some great nation... 

But this update is not about some disgusted politics but about my decision to put a possible official article about electron spin in the garbage bin. 

Item 1) So no try at some official publication? 

  Item 1) So no try at some official publication? 

No, there are only reasons against it. I just don't feel good about it 

For example on my computer system for some strange reason pictures never get properly included in the Latex texts. So about two years back I did put together a new computer that could serve as a spare for when my regular computer broke down. 

But in those two years of time I never investigated if pictures could be properly included on the spare computer... Also a few months back the spare computer broke down and I haven't even looked into why it does not function any more... 

When I read my own emotional state over all that time, I think I am not very eager at this point in time to try to get some stuff 'officially published'. 

It is not only that it is very hard to take the so called 'peer review' threshold, the small possibility of taking that threshold is not my main reason of canceling all prospects of an electron spin related article.
You must also weigh that against the outcomes of a possible success:  

Suppose I could write that 'perfect article' and with a bit of tunneling luck it becomes mainstream that electron spin is not a vector but a magnetic charge, why should I even try to write such a 'perfect article'?

Beside that a few years back I more or less expected to have more experimental evidence or even proof by now. But beside that old television of 12 € and that set of neodymium magnets, I never came across any apparatus I could use.
And say for yourself, using a television of 12 € is not something that those scientific magazines will applaud. Here is an old photo from April 2016 that, in my view, proves that electrons get accelerated by magnetic fields:

 

And then there is the problem of scientific journal selection; what scientific publication would be best to approach after writing some 'official publication'? I don't have a clue because I only use internet sources like the preprint archive & the likes.

I do not read such scientific journals and that raises a funny but also philosophical question to mind: Why should I try to get a publication into a scientific journal or paper that I do not read myself? 
That is not rational behavior, for my life it does not make much sense... 

No no, I am not crazy to the bone yet and it is better that at least this decade the official position of all university physics professors is that electrons are magnetic dipoles. That is best for every one.

If you click on the picture below, you will land at Reason 62 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles: 

 

 

End of this update.  

 

(02 June 2018) It has been a very lazy week for me. After publishing the coordinate functions of the 4D exponential curve, why not take a break?

Luckily there is all kinds of chaos to look at; according to donald trump the operatives from the deep state had infiltrated his campaign with a spy. Oh oh, it is going to take a long time before the USA citizens realize that their POTUS is mentally ill.
It is now about 500 days of looking at news and all so often mostly on a daily basis you observe the words THIS IS NOT NORMAL.

And yes I agree, this or that donald trump detail is not normal because the brain of donald trump does not function properly. But if people try to say that, suddenly you are not allowed to say that because 'you are not a mental health expert' and most of all 'you did not investigate him'.

Come on, what we observe is easy to understand; the donald trump guy might be a bit more intelligent compared to the average US consumer, but he is clearly mentally ill because he more or less believes the nonsense he is speaking. 

But enough of the donald, in this update only one item and that is a teaser picture for my latest post on the other website. 

Item 1) A teaser picture for the new baby tau number in 4D.

  Item 1) A teaser picture for the new baby tau number in 4D.

Lately I have been studying the four dimensional complex numbers a little bit, they are fun to write about because a century of so called smart physics professors never found this beautiful mathematical object. 

Just like the math professors, the mathematical horizon of physics professors is likely the quaternions in four dimensional space. 

And this while in general 4D space has been in the interest of physics professors for over a full century. The human brain is not made for math, it is much more an emotional machine. The human brain needs on a daily basis all that emotion because that makes you feel alive but it also prevents you from cooling down and analyze the stuff on a deeper level.

To put it simple: We humans are only a bunch of monkeys on a rock. 

__________ 

Ok, here is the teaser picture and if you click on it you can find out how to craft those cute looking coordinate functions:

 

It might look a bit difficult but that is only how it looks. 

The only thing that matters is the first coordinate function, the others are just time lags of the first one. So this is the product of two cosine functions, one with period 4 and the other with period 8.

That's all, hope you have a tiny bit of cognitive growth and in case you also want some emotion: 

Let US pray for the day when the donald trump problem is solved via a nine millimeter solution through his head. 

Just like that funny Ghadaffi video, wouldn't that be great?

Or better cool down and do a tiny bit more math? 

End of this update. 

 

(13 May 2018) Is the stock market going to crash in the foreseeable future? 

For this year I am not expecting this although it has to be remarked that stock market growth as a percentage has been a huge multiple of underlying economical growth. 

In the previous update I mentioned the so called 'Second activation of the Nightmare on Wall Street' as was started on 12 Nov 2007. At that point in time I had already studied the worldwide financial system since the year 2004. So after 3 years of study I had a good oversight upon the many weaknesses and bubbles there were around in those long lost years. 

My main insight into 'this is going to blast' was mostly rooted in the fact that the US financial system annually adjusted needed about 2.4 trillion US$ fresh debt in order to function properly.

It was obvious there was not that much money to satisfy that level of fresh debt... 

So it just had to snap... 

Item 1) What will happen with QT in the year 2019?

 Item 1) What will happen with QT in the year 2019?

Since the financial crisis from a decade ago it has been a fact of life that the US federal deficits growth was always above economical growth and as such tax money intake. 

At the beginning 10 years ago the total US federal debt was about 60% of the gross domestic product, at present day it is hovering about 100% of the GDP.

QT if the fine art of the central banks to unload some of the stuff they bought and QT stands for 'quantitative tightening' and as such the US federal reserve plans to sell all those US federal debt they bought. I do not know the exact numbers, say they sell about 50 billion US$ a month. That would be about 600 billion in the year 2019...

The US federal deficit for 2019 could be as much as one trillion, likely a bit more because donald trump is the king of debt so that is an extra market pressure of 1000 billion US$ in fresh debt. 

To top it off, there is also old US federal debt that will mature and it has to be paid back. Of course there are no saving funds for that so they will do the refi or the 'refinance' thing. I do not know the numbers and have no clue about how many billions these are, but will old investors in US debt that matures in 2019 actually buy new US debt??? 

So all in all the present market situation is easy to understand:

It is totally crazy and can the central banks really sell all the garbage they bought? 

The numbers in the next picture are total US federal debt levels in billions of US$. Of course what is still left out is the hidden debt like in the social security funds. Stuff that looks like some asset but is in fact debt to be sold in a future market... 

Source of the numbers: FED Z1 release
https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/20180308/html/default.htm

 

Ok, let us leave all this market madness behind and just observe how the central bankers of the USA and Europe sell the stuff like they promised... 

Till updates my dear reader.  

 

(27 April 2018) The staying power in the news of the pee pee tape over the last two weeks is amazing. On 14 April when I wrote the previous post I did not know it but it seems that donald trump on three or four occasions brought the subject of pee pee tape up with James Comey.  

So that makes it much more likely that indeed some splashing details are true, but if the tape exists we still don't know what is upon it. It would be great if indeed we will see the donald consuming lady pee while on hands and knees... 

Beside the fun, in this short update I would like to try explain as why donald is mentally ill as I have been thinking all of the time. That is our item for today: 

Item 1) What explains all those weird lies from donald trump?

 Item 1) What explains all those weird lies from donald trump?

Two strange flaws that often bedevil the donald are: 

1) This giant stream of lies and
2) The absence of strategic thinking.  

Just like most people I only thought donald was some pathological liar and emotionally too unstable to have any strategic importance. 

For the rest I did not think much about it, after all it is not my problem. 

But lately the former head of the FBI James Comey told a few times that donald trump has no morals at all. In the brain of donald trump, all moral stuff is completely void. 

Most morals also have a biological embedding in the brain, if a species has some biological based morals that can help them or hinder them. For example if cannibalism is rampant among some animal species, this could hinder the long term survival of that species and as such most animal species avoid cannibalism under normal circumstances. 

For example a small brain fish like a piranha, when they attack a prey they never attack each other. Now are the piranha embedded by God with moral values like 'thou shall not eat thye neighbor nor the daughter of the neighbor'?
No, God has not much to do with it.
If all piranha's know they will never be attacked by their fellow hunters, that makes them the formable attack force they are.   

Morals in some animal species or our own human species often make clear when you can attack a fellow member of your species. It is well known that donald trump attacks a lot of people often for what we consider as 'no reason at all'. 

For example when donald trump strikes at those NFL players for kneeling down on one knee during the playing of the national anthem. Only a person with a brain that is not properly functioning on the biological level would do that, you must have something that is some deviation from normal brain functioning. 

Now suppose the observation from James Comey is correct and indeed donald trump is void of morals, in that case the border line between a lie and that what is true fades away. The brain activity of donald must be the same if he tells a lie or when he tells the truth. 

In my view, this is a deep rooted malfunctioning of the human brain.
In other words: The US prez donald trump is mentally ill.

__________

The words as written above should not be read as negative stuff, or that I am in some depressed mode about the future of humanity while we have a bag of garbage at the nuclear button of the USA...

A few months back I came about that html page I wrote about a decade ago.
And I smiled softly because now 10 years later it all looked so chaotic, just like the donald has all that chaos surrounding him.

Although my html file was highly chaotic if you read it after 10 years, it did not lack strategic thinking. After all I had reached my goals and the DOW Jones was cut in half... ;)

Here is a screen shot picture from the start of that file, click on it to go to the old html file:

 

Oh oh, those good old days without donald trump:
Need an AAA credit rating? Just buy one!  

That was it for this update, thanks for your attention. 

 

(14 April 2018) The last days there suddenly is a tiny bit more news of the 'pee pee tape' related to a visit from donald trump to Moscow. As the rumor went, donald wanted a room and had some prostitutes pee over each other...

The whole thing was secretly taped and as such could be an explanation as why the Russians have so much sway over donald trump. 

I always considered this a bag of nonsense, if it is true that we only see a few prostitutes peeing on each other, why should a person like donald be embarresed? 

That is our first item of this update, in the second item a few more reasons as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles... 

Anyway here we go: 

Item 1) How does donald trump get his potassium?
Item 2) A zero field splitting of electron spin?

 Item 1) How does donald trump get his potassium?

Potassium is an important element for your body, daily enough intake via enough veggies is important because your body cannot hold on it. You can't store potassium, you pee it out. 

Some time back last year James Comey was fired from his CIA post and now he has a book coming out and one of the details seems to be that donald asked James Comey to start an investigation into the 'pee pee tape' and the conclusion should be that it was all not true. 

When those pee pee rumors emerged for the first time, after a few minutes of thinking about this relatively weird news I understood what could be on the pee pee tape: 

That was not donald trump ordering a few hookers to urinate over each other, no no much more likely it was that the present US president donald trump was on hands an knees and actively drinking as much of the stuff as possible. 

Now with the new information coming in that donald trump wanted an 'investigation' into the pee pee tape from Moscow, after waiting long it just looks more and more likely that donald trump did indeed swallow a lot of urine while he was on hands and knees... 

_________ 

After having said that, it is a pity that it will likely take a few more years before the pee pee tape finally will surface. On the positive side, if there is one pee pee tape that is talked about, what else can there be? 

Let's leave it with that. 

 Item 2) A zero field splitting of electron spin?

On 7 and 9 April I posted two more reasons as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles. 

The 7 April update is about the Majorama fermions as found by the Dutch university of Delft (I still don't think these particles are their own anti particle my dear Delft folks). 

The 9 April update is a bit more from the chemical sciences; even in the absence of any applied magnetic field there still is a difference in electron spin state.
It has a beautiful name: Zero field splitting... 

Scroll down on page four of the magnetic stuff as it is covered on this website: 

monopole_magnetic_stuff03.htm 

The funny detail in the last reason is that even in the absence of a magnetic field there still are two kinds of electrons, that once more validates that electrons do not have spin but charge, that is magnetic charge so to say...

Ok, that was it for this update. Till updates. 

__________

End of this archive file index12.htm.  

Archive (of these homepage files). 

Everything on the 3D complex numbers from 2012 and 2013 is bundled together in one html file.  

A primer on the three dimensional complex numbers.

For 2014 there is page number two: Page 2   

In 2015 we proceed with page number three: Page 3 

In 2016 still zero point zero reaction from the official math professors. Ok, let's proceed with page number four: Page 4 

In Nov 2015 I opened a separate website for the three dimensional complex numbers:

http://3dcomplexnumbers.net/  

__________________

23 Dec 2014: Back in the year 1748 or so, Leonhard Euler found the very first exponential circle.  

It is also known as the Euler identity, Euler's formulae etc etc. 

 

In the last 2.65 years I found 10 more of these circles & periodic curves in higher dimensional complex number systems. 
I made a 25 page pdf from it. 

An overview of 10 exponential circles & periodic curves.  

Please take your time and try to understand it page by page. If you do all 25 pages in one day, very likely you will go bonkers...  

____________________

28 Oct 2015: Finally I started a new html page about electrons (and other spin half particles) that, after my humble opinion, are the long sought magnetic monopoles. 

It starts with the Ten reasons why electrons are magnetic monopoles

09 Jan 2017: The link above grew out to 41 reasons that electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles. We proceed with reason number 42 on

Page 2 as why electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles. 

Page 3 covers the stuff as found in the year 2018.

Page 4 covers the stuff for the year 2019. 

 ____________________

29 Jan 2015: I made a new kind of so called Clifford algebras. As far as I can see it will have no practical value whatsoever. 
It is only six pages long, it contains no definition but only examples.
Clifford algebras cubic style

 _____________________

14 July 2014: Since a lot of young folks are also hanging around here I wrote a simple piece named the Water Planet.
We calculate as a start the number of water molecules in a liter of water; Here is the rest. 

___________________

19 June 2014; The noble are of product integration is a very seldom observed thing.
That is caused by the fact that in general math professors are relatively dumb people. Ok they are good in reproducing things from the past but a relative more advanced concept like a continuous product is met with a giant vacuum inside their brains.
So if those folks were talented they would use it and given the fact almost nobody uses it, the dire straits of average math departments is clear... 

Ten styles for product integration and product differentiation.  

09 Jan 2015: Later I rewrote the piece a little bit using the curly font from Richard Gill for writing the product integral. 

The content has not changed, the difference is only the curly symbol used... 

Ten styles for product integration and product differentiation with the curly notation

____________________ 

Some old math I wrote about 13 years ago, it is very simple to understand: you can differentiate and integrate all geometrical objects. And when you triangulate a landscape or a movie scene properly you can later in a computer change the position of the camera. Of course you need a new file format because the goody good mpg format won't work.
This might be of future interest for police or stuff like that (you can change the camera viewpoint to that of the victims or that of the criminals. Of course this is not a miracle; missing information can only be repaired at a certain level but anyway... The math is there and it is waiting to be used!
(Ok you also need geometrical integration but that's a cakewalk, some geometric projection theory, lots of self repairing codes and very very difficult: a good camera device. But if these conditions are met you can later change the camera viewpoint...)

____________________ 

(17 Oct 2008) This morning I finished a very simple and non technical article about statistical testing of poisons in food. It is so horrible non technical that even political leaders can understand it's content; only seldom I have sunken so low...

Here is the pdf file.

____________________ 

A pdf file explaining why we likely never ever will have nuclear fusion as a reliable source of unlimited energy...  

Nuclear_fusion.pdf 

 ____________________ 

Sayings from famous and unknown people that shed light on their insights and their emotional daily running system:

Phrase nr one (from Dubya or the present lame duck president of the USA):

"The reason we start a war is to fight a war, win a war, thereby causing no more war!"
--The first Presidential debate

Phrase nr two, also from Dubya but I have to pump it up from my memory so there might be some little faults in it (it was some weeks after the 911 attacks on the USA):

The enemy is so evil that most people in the USA do not know what they do why they do!

Phrase nr three from the former USA secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld (if my memory is correct he spoke these words in the week from 16 to 21 October 2001, at that point in time we were on the height of the anthrax scares): 

And it makes you wonder; How does he do it? And we would like to ask this person to come on over to our side and together fight the war on terror.

Phrase nr four is from me myself & I:

To understand your own 'logical thinking' you must know that logical thinking is only the first derivate of emotion. That is why all attempts towards artificial intelligence have failed: computers do not have emotion build in but we humans, like all other animals,  do.
The above mentioned three phrases of my enemies only expose their emotional system, lets destroy that system...

Phrase nr five is from US celebrity Donald Trump. A few weeks before this the famous Lancet report was published calculating Iraqi civil death toll at 650 thousand (this with a relatively large but acceptable standard deviation):

For myself I use 400 thousand killed.

Phrase nr six is from CNN's Larry King (CNN is received in 200 countries so therefore the CNN management thinks it's wise that Larry King can parade every day one or more American celebrities). When King was asked why he did not use the internet he responded:

There are a billion things on the internet.

Phrase nr seven is one more from the former US secretary of defense. After a few years in the war on terror he was asked what it all boiled down to. He said:

Can we kill the terrorists in a faster rate than the massandra's spit them out?

Phrase nr eight is from Osama bin Laden. The phrase is very worthwhile mentioning because the US CIA folks were in the past very satisfied with 'Just a few weapon deliveries and we lured the Russians into Afghanistan'.

When America needed us to fight their proxy war against Russia they supported us. The moment the Russians left Afghanistan we were irrelevant. 

Phrase nr nine is from US four star general Peter Pace, he made it during a memorial speech on 11 Sept 2006 (exactly five years after the 9/11 attacks from 2001).
At that point in time total US military death toll already stood above the number of civilians killed on 9/11/2001.

Right now the total amount of killed US military members is approaching the civil death toll from nine September 2001.

Phrase nr 10 is again from me myself & I. It is around the rebuilding of the organization after the military campaign in Afghanistan.

Make sure to imitate the way the German army was organized after world war one; That is make sure that every member can function properly until up three hierarchical layers higher. If you do that you can grow with an enormous speed in the future when this is needed.

Phrase nr eleven is also from me myself & I. It is to proof that I can be stupid too. I do not know when I wrote it but it was a long time ago.
I asked the Iraqis the next:

Can you hold on one more year? After that things will get better, I promise.

You just don't imagine how much I have regretted those words, after that the US military came with bonuses of up to 70 thousand dollars for enlisting / reenlisting and how could I have been so stupid as to not have foreseen this?
I mean the Americans run their country on the greenback & why was I outside reality? Why?

Phrase number twelve is from a peace loving female neighbor of mine, her name is Geertruida.

We people we can speak, so we should not fight war but speak with each other until our differences are solved.

Of course I had to remark: Because we have speech we are much better in making war compared to other animal species. 

Phrase nr thirteen is from the present al Qaida leader in Iraq. I mention it because I think it was a very important detail, it was made in his first statement after he took over from Zarqawi.

We need help from scientists, let it be in the field of communications, chemistry, medics, biologicals or whatever what. You can live your dream and kill the Americans on a large scale inside their bases. You can fulfill your scientific dreams.

Phrase nr fourteen is from CNN's war whore Christiana Armanpour. Why do I call a whore where in fact she is a respected senior correspondent?
That is because she understands the difference between a 'commodity driven war' and one that is not driven by that.
In the entire Iraqi war no CNN reporter has emphasized that Iraq is very much 'commodity driven' (read stealing the oil) but when Tony Blair resigns she says:

He wanted military assistance in Bosnia although there are no commodities over there.

(Or words of similar phrasing, I do not recall her exact words but they boiled down to the above.)   

____________________ 

Not all my hobbies evolve around war, death and destruction, or financial markets. No, I also like to cook food and stuff. There will not be many recipes but here is the index to some food I made, it is just a small fraction of what I cook. A very small fraction but the goal is to come to a feast meal for the Iraqis and Afghanis. So it likely will take a few more years...

____________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

    

______________________________________

   _______________________________________ 

Title: A 2018 condolences card to the US dollar.