The birth of the Kweb.

          

      Homepage       Disclaimer to these pages                   Part XXIXV          Part XXXVII              Index to birth of Kweb

Dear readers, I have changed this page into a series of pages. 
Mostly on a monthly bases, so now we have August 2004.
Look at the index of these pages!

Part XXXVI: August 2004:

  

 

Date

Extra texts  

 06 August 2004     
 07 August 2004    txt01: Iraqi Najaf info & a real Shia uprising?
08 August 2004     
 09 August 2004     
 10 August 2004     
 11 August 2004     
12 August 2004     
 14 August 2004    txt01: Declaration of Economical Sanctions against the USA 
 15 August 2004     
 16 August 2004    txt01: The discovery of America, who did it?  
 17 August 2004    txt01: A letter to the Janjaweed platoons in Sudan  
 18 August 2004      
 19 August 2004     
 20 August 2004    txt01: Cache of the homepage texts until 20 August 2004  
 21 August 2004    txt01: Military Bloody Days nr8 & Ramadan  
 22 August 2004     
 23 August 2004     
 24 August 2004    txt01: The Thailand equation from MBD7 
 26 August 2004    txt01: War Tribunal request; Solve the boots problem 
 27 August 2004     
 29 August 2004    txt01: US military spending 1946 / 2004  
 30 August 2004      
 31 August 2004    txt01: Evolution of the IDE in the Iraqi landscape  

   

Introduction:

To readers who are new to this story: You are now in part XXXVI of the Birth of the Kweb, the Kweb is of course the KinkyWeb&is this website. This website is good&strong, it's some fine piece of art. Sometimes I write a bit rough on some subjects, but that's the way it is. If you don't like that you get to some other PolitcalCorrect website please!
If you are new, you have to know that almost all things I do write on this website do have some nasty habit of coming out. To avoid judicial shit I had to place some disclaimers, here is the disclaimer to this story.  

Also it is wise to read the Introduction to the stories, here I spell out some words that frequently appear in the stories, for example the SilverBullet. Who is the SilverBullet do you think? If you don't know read the Introduction to TheStoriesProject

      

06 August 2004: And now we have part 36 of this long long story already, it looks like the power in this story is growing very very slowly and very steady. Lots of 'power grab' has been committed by this story, think for example at the anthrax within 60 hours delivered, the nuke scare into the Pakistan landscape from late 2001, the NightmareOnWallStreet that did bring the DOW almost at the desired level of 7000...

And since the influence of power often is combined with hefty violence I often have to think about all those questions that linger in my mind; Was is after all a wise decision to give the Americans permission in the Summer of 2002 to start war against Iraq? (I only wanted an end at the economical sanctions and the only way possible was war from America against Iraq...) Does it help when I ask the Afghani opium traders to try to imitate the Western way of agricultural subsidies when I would like to see a bit of income for Afghani farmers? Is it good, from a moral point of view, to recite for a nuke into the North American landscape? And what about those so called 'designer diseases', is it good to incorporate this into the story as some deterrent for the evolution of making war into the way wars have to be executed?

But lets tunnel into the here and now, especially lets take a fine look at the bombings of those Iraqi churches. Here we go:

Last Sunday (five days ago) I did read a few written reports on those church bombings, I really felt curios and I did not understand the details as I found them. Six car bombs (why six and not the standard 5 or 7 or the 5 + 7 = 12?) and only 10 or 11 dead reported...
So I was thinking there was some complete new group formed that used some small sized car bombs to make strikes at religious objects. I didn't grasp what suddenly emerged from the Iraqi equation, therefore I condemned it as a primary reaction. Here is what I wrote on that subject five days ago:  

(Sunday 01 August 21.03 hours) Temporary update upon the Iraqi Church bombings:

Reports are that 5 or 6 small car bombs detonated against churches in Iraq, this is not good. May I ask the Iraqi Association of CarBombMakers to explain at their few colleagues who made those small car bombs that this is against elementary battlefield morals. Also the ones who helped organizing these attacks need to be spoken upon, religious targets are just not good.
I am not mad or so and I will not give the US army a 2 to 3 week full allowance of the use of air power or so, but stuff like that makes me sad. Religious targets like mosques and churches are just no good, thanks for your attention. (And good luck with finding the folks who did this...)    

But when I was away for a couple of days I did see a newspaper with a large frontpage photo on it with the results of just one church. That was definitely not a small car bomb, that was a rather standard one. (Here is a similar picture to what I did see on that newspaper:)

Title: This was not a small car bomb, just a standard one. 
      

So I had to think a bit more, this was not the small stuff from some new cell. But what would have happened then? Why six car bombs? Did one not go off or so?
Later it came to my attention that not six but five churches came under attack, so that was good and I found ground under my feet again (so six bombs against five churches). But the next question I had to face was 'Why this religious provocation, why?' 

When I came back (here behind my little computer keyboard) I suddenly had to laugh, I understood the operatives had been naughty naughty when I did read my own written words again. Let me quote what I wrote myself seven days ago: 

(Friday 30 July 11.58 hours) Oh oh, what fascinating reading is the 9/11 report. It all fits nicely again, only some timeline details were wrongly estimated by me. For example the study of the smuggling of knives aboard of planes was far longer going on then I expected. But these are only details, important details but details anyway... 
Far more important is the fact that the 9/11 mission never derailed and after my humble opinion it is still that 21 May 2001 provocation of the Muslim faith that did prevent the operation from derailing. Don't believe me? Here is a very significant quote from the report:

On June 21, near the height of the threat reporting, U.S. Central Command raised the force 
protection condition level for U.S. troops in six countries to the highest possible level, Delta. 

Again this is perfectly in line with my so called 'trigger hypothesis' like so many hundred other details. But the (local) authorities still refuse to investigate a bit, they even tell me at face value that they are not capable of seeing any kind of connection between what I write and the unfolding of attacks in practice...
Well, that is their responsibility and not mine any longer. I have done my best and now I can only wish the operatives good luck in the impending attacks here in Europe. The local US embassy refuses to give me insight into the 'chatter level' before and after 21May so they cannot say they don't deserve the impending attacks.
It is time again to write in blood, let it be. Let it be.

Till updates...   

And with that quote above in the back of my mind I grasped the message of the church attacks; it was a message for the Whitest of Houses on this planet. It was a message for the USA government, especially a message for those folks that are sometimes referred to as 'The White House Gang'.  

So I have decided to forgive the (Iraqi) operatives on this one, simply because the present US government is avoiding the real truth coming out upon the 9/11 attacks in New York & Pentagon. And also because I myself have been a bit naughty naughty too on 21 May 2001 when I made that provocation against the Islamic belief... 

BUT, and I am serious on this, the (Iraqi) operatives must not take it out on the Iraqi Christians. As a strategy this simply is not good, as a message at the American address it is understandable this happened one time. That is my opinion on this and I only tell the truth as far as I see it.  

Title: Will the present Iraqi government understand the message? No!  
        

No no, the present Iraqi government just will not understand the message upon the above religious provocation. Lately I started understanding how they collected that 'president' and that 'prime minister'. This president and this prime minister only talk that very familiar sounding stuff like: 'The evil forces of this planet are attacking us' and stuff like that.
Why don't they take a holiday and visit the White House and build a tent on the lawn and fight evil powers all day long? Just like the Americans are doing... Fighting evil always and seeing evil everywhere, stupid is what they are and the Americans they must be killed in the thousands and the hundreds of thousands. That is what they need, that is what is good for this little planet. Or not my dear reader? Do you agree with me or do you not agree with me? Now, what are you thinking my dear reader? What are you thinking? 

Will the religious parts of America also understand the message of these Church attacks? I doubt that very much, the average American is rather stupid when it comes to messages from abroad and although it was a long long time ago that Muslims attacked Christian religious objects they very likely will refuse to understand the message... The American mindset is well known to me and it is wise to kill lots of that country, just lots of them.

Title: Religious blasphemy observed in America. Kill it!
    

Later I found the next info that looks rather trustworthy, there were seven car bombs used! Look at the Media report below for the details as found on a website named World Magazine Online:

Media report to 06 August: More info around the Church bombings in Iraq: 
At six in the evening—just as most services begin—a car bomb exploded outside the Armenian church in Karada, a Baghdad neighborhood that was the heart of the Christian community before and during British colonial rule and where old-line churches post-Saddam thrive. Minutes later an explosion rocked the Catholic Syriac Church, also in Karada. Then, as the Chaldean Church of St. Peter and St. Paul emptied from evening mass, two blasts hammered the compound. Bombers also struck Mar Elya church in north Baghdad. At nearly the same time and 220 miles north, two car bombs exploded in central Mosul outside Mar Polis church.*

Comment: Just count the number of car bombs used, it is seven. So I finally have solid ground under my feet again.

So all in all when time passes by sometimes the truth comes floating above. Seven simultaneously exploding car bombs are impressive.

Lets hope the impending works in Europe are 

similar to that. And oh, oops I have to ask at the operatives to think about the concept of a Civil Bloody Day. Just like those Military Bloody Days (against hard targets). I did think lots of weeks around it but I lay at your feet the concept of Civil Bloody Days...
Think about it, it has to fit in your agendas too but when I know the date I will tell you this as soon as possible. 
(Motivation: My oldest enemy that used to live in the twin towers in the South of this city Groningen, the IBG buildings, wants me in court again. My enemy throws in lots of high paid lawyers and very likely they will obey the American wish, meaning me never online again...) 

It is a civil case, therefore the concept of CMD might be sad but they need to feel it. And, on some other hand, the Hamas sheik needs revenge too. It is all one cluster of emotion but when I have the date I will let you know as soon as possible. (But when a short term date is needed by you, 07 September would be that short term date yet this is not the date of my impending civil trial.)

_____1_____

_____2_____

End to the writings of this day, live well and think well my dear readers. 

07 August 2004: A bit more upon the hostage taking & execution into the Iraqi landscape. Lately I gave some guiding lines upon the right morals in that kind of dirty work, as far as I can see these guiding lines even work. That is good and that is fine.
My dear reader face the facts; When a US helicopter is shot from the skies we all jump from joy. When a hostage is executed we often don't jump from joy, it doesn't have that fun element in it yet it can be very efficient.

Remark that truck company that did declare they will not transport supplies for the US army any longer, it was reported that it was about 120 or 180 truck loads a day. (I don't remember the exact number anymore but even the 120 complete truckloads is an impressive number.) 
In a nutshell my advice upon the execution was rather simple; when the hostage is US military related it is allowed from a moral point of view to execute this hostage. Why not quote exactly what I wrote that day:

(Tuesday 06 July 18.40 hours) Tranquility is in the mind, anyway this day it is. It is good that the next Military Bloody Day date is out (26 July so 20 days from now) and so good luck to those who need it.
My mind will be with you the next time, oh now I remember it: The instructions of the use of hostages was not spelled out in detail. Here they are: 

--To make it clear that no US air power is allowed during the 5 to 7 days before 26 July it could be wise for the Iraqi operatives to start collecting military related hostages. In case the air power rule for the US army is violated in many ways all hostages will be executed.
But what are 'military related' hostages? Let me give you a few examples of 'US military related' people. Here we go:

-All US army personnel wearing the uniform,
-All US army personnel captured in civil clothing (but the ID papers say its a US soldier or so),
-All people who are on the pay roll of military equipment companies (like that Saudi example of the guy that repaired Apache helicopters),
-All US 'civilians' that do jobs that normally would have been done by the US army in Iraq, when they carry a gun they are very simply 'military related' (think for example at those four Blackwater employees, all four were former US military),
-Red Cross employees 'inspecting' the 'Geneva convention rules upon making war' are definitely US military related while the Red Cross employees taking care of the medical and human aid parts of the Red Cross are often only there to help. 

The above are just a few examples, make up your mind upon the 'US military related yes/no' question yourself when you have captured one 'foreigner in Iraq'. 

 

Of course the above quotes do not cover all possible situation the Iraqi resistance meets in practice but from the arguing of the resistance around that truck driver it is clear that the spirit of these instructions is there. Thanks!

But there is more important stuff on the hostage taking observed, let me quote it for you:

BAGHDAD, Iraq -- Gunmen in the city of Fallujah led a raid on a kidnappers' lair, forcing the overmatched militants inside to flee and free four Jordanian hostages Wednesday, as two Turkish truck drivers held by a separate group were also released.

Comment: Now my dear US army you can shove this into your ass; according to your statements the 'Fallujah model' would not be repeated in other cities. But in Fallujah the hostages were freed and not executed my dear but stupid US army, was it wrong from me to email you in the week after 29 April that I thanked you for applying the 'Begin model' in Fallujah? (The Begin model is the fact that former Israeli terrorist Meachim Begin did let the terrorist group he belonged to merge with the new born Israeli defense forces a long time ago. Meachim did involve for example in strikes at post offices in the pre Israeli state period...)

After all this heavy stuff it is time for a bit of amusement. The picture below is very nice and funny, you can see Evil Bert acting like monsieur Atef. Isn't that cute from the Americans? But how the hell did Evil Bert get the job done by Mohammed Atef? Do thee know my dear reader? For myself speaking I do not have a clue either of course; who the hell is doing the work of Atef these days and these years???

Title: What the hell is the connection between Evil Bert and Mohammed Atef???
    

Isn't it a very cute picture above? You see all kinds of masterminds of the evil forces of this planet! But what is Evil Bert doing in it all? I am only smiling of course, I am only smiling softly but broadly.

__________________________

From a website named icasualties dot org (a very handy source of info around the US fatalities in Iraq) I found the next information upon those brave US soldier heroes that suddenly died just 30 minutes before my last trial from 29 April. (The trial was over three months back now and I still do not have the final verdict while I wrote the judges letters and emails telling that I wanted that verdict! But they just do not answer...).
Of course it is only coincidental but sharply 30 minutes before this trial the Mahmudiyah blast was there, suppose furthermore as some hypothetical exercise that I am Evil Bert. In that case I would thank the Iraqis from the deepest of my heart...
But beside all jokes, it really helped a lot for this trial. Thirty minutes before and just BOOM! 

Now enjoy the next statistics around the US fatalities on 29 April and the overall statistics as found there under: 

29-Apr-2004: 11 dead during operation Iraqi Freedom | US: 11 | UK: 0 | Other: 0 

US Sergeant Adam W. Estep 
US Private 1st Class Jeremy Ricardo Ewing 
US Specialist Martin W. Kondor Ba’qubah 
US Staff Sergeant Esau G. Patterson Jr. 
US Staff Sergeant Jeffrey F. Dayton 
US Sergeant Ryan M. Campbell  
US Specialist James L. Beckstrand
US Specialist Justin B. Schmidt  
US Private 1st Class Ryan E.
US Private 1st Class Norman Darling
US Sergeant Landis W. Garrison 
Baghdad (eastern part) 
Mahmudiyah (near) 
Ba’qubah
Mahmudiyah (near) Mahmudiyah (near) 
Mahmudiyah (near) 
Mahmudiyah (near) 
Mahmudiyah (near) 
Mahmudiyah (near) 
Mahmudiyah (near) 
Baghdad (Abu Ghuraib) 
hostile fire - RPG attack 
hostile fire - car bomb 
hostile fire - IED attack 
hostile fire - car bomb 
hostile fire - car bomb 
hostile fire - car bomb 
hostile fire - car bomb 
hostile fire - car bomb 
hostile fire - car bomb 
hostile fire - car bomb 
Non-hostile - unspecified cause

Title: April was a good month for harvesting US soldier bodies... 
    

End to the writings to this day, think with light my dear readers.

08 August 2004: Today we take a look at American propaganda into this WarOnTerror, there are hundreds of examples found in the mainstream American Media files but since almost every one is capable of reading that propaganda it looks wise to skip that mainstream propaganda.

Only two details will pass in this; 

-1-We take a look at the latest three 'al Qaida' statements concerning the European equation (there was a four month truce from 15 April until 15 August next week, at first 3 months + an additional one). [Remark: I was wrong on details, unforgiven of course, but this entry was edited at 19 August again...

-2-We take a look at the writings of Ann Coulter from America.

Before we take a look at the summary of those three 'al Qaida' statements we read the quote from US Navy Secretary England, quote found on the yahoo website from newssource Reuters, the next quote was made in relation with the treatment of three Britons held in Quantomano bay that were captured in the Afghan landscape:) 

US Navy Secretary England denied that the former prisoners were beaten and abused at Guantanamo.

"This is a war of words and propaganda and I would be very suspicious of people who said things like that," England told reporters. "This is a very smart foe and they're going to do whatever they can to defeat us and sow distrust among our friends and allies."

Comment: So we see we are already long into avoiding the truth as it happens but only concerned about 'sowing distrust among our friends and allies'. According to my humble opinion you are some shithead my dear Navy Secretary England... The only thing that counts is the truth and not your stupid spinning stuff.

Now we can take a look at a very short summary of the three latest statements as they surfaced in the Media files.

Statement 1: European cities will get struck by columns of rigged cars.
Statement 2: Collect food and cash for an entire month.
Statement 3: We remind the European audiences kindly at the fact that the 15 August date will pass soon, the previous two announcements were wrong meaning they were not from us.  

We ask ourselves the next question: "Might it be possible that in fact Statement number 3 is correct while number 1 and 2 are in fact American related propaganda."? Is this too far sought? Am I seeing conspiracies where there are no conspiracies at all? Lets look at a few problems there are with statement number 1 and 2:

The (military) problem with statement 1 is that it is rather unlogical that the method of attack will be told on the forehand. From a military point of view this can only be done if in fact the real method of attack will be completely different.  

Statement 2 is even more bizarre, as far as I know it is not possible to lay siege on European cities for a full month time. Nor is it possible to disrupt food and money supply to entire cities for a full month time.
This all is rubbish from a military point of view. So is statement number two a real al Qaida statement?
Or is it, given the fact that the content of that statement never can emerge, some cheap propaganda effort from US/UK related counter terror figures? 

Therefore statement number 3 looks the most reasonable evenmore because of the timing of it's announcement (but I will spare my dear reader the details of the timing because my dear reader very likely is not smart enough to understand that, just like the entire police in ThisOldCity named Groningen). 

After these statements we take a fine look at some completely different source of American propaganda, it is around some American writer/publisher under the name of Ann Coulter. She is always a pleasure to read because she looks so smart but the problem is she always jumps to conclusions too fast. 
But I like her a lot, she can poke fun for years at embassies that are bombed by the US military 'by accident'. For example the French embassy in Lybia and the Chinese in the former Yugoslavia. For years on a row Ann pokes fun into relating the Chinese and French policies of those years to the 'accidental bombing' of their embassies.
Of course Ann knows very well that the US bombed embassies in Africa are only done by extremists and simple minded Muslims... She is a funny writer that is tactical very good but has lousy strategy. Here is a nice pic of Ann:

Title: Ann can poke fun for years at bombed embassies, she can... 
        

The fact that Ann can have fun for years on 'accidental bombed' embassies is relatively disturbing because Ann is a real mainstream hit in conservative America. The fact that no conservative leader ever told her to stop poking fun at accidental bombed embassies (because that is terror too) gives rise to the expectation that the silent majority of American conservatives consider this 'funny' too.

There is no denying this my dear Ann, for years you have poked fun at that and therefore I have to classify you as one of the SlutsToTheConservativeMindset. My dear Ann, your writings would improve a lot in case you would substitute the word 'Democrat' for 'American' in your writings in all relevant places. After that you could read your own writings again and you can learn about the way the rest of the world views America in general. 
Give it a try Ann, it might pay of, it might pay of. 

Now we ask ourselves the next question: Is Ann Coulter really a SlutToTheConservativeMindset? In case the producer of the next sellable item votes Republican the answer is YES. And if the producer of this item votes Democrat it is definitely a YES. Lets poke fun at the SlutToTheConservativeMindset:

Title: Ann can poke fun for years at bombed embassies, she can... 
      

To give you an example of the wonderful ways Ann looks at the world you can enjoy a quote from one of her writings. The title of the article involved is 'How 9-11 Happened'. Here is a sample of her marvelous insights in world politics:

On April 5, 1986, a West Berlin discotheque frequented by U.S. servicemen was bombed by Muslim extremists from the Libyan Embassy in East Berlin, killing an American.

Ten days later, Reagan bombed Libya, despite our dear ally France refusing the use of their airspace. Americans bombed Gadhafi's residence, killing his daughter, and dropped a bomb on the French Embassy "by mistake."

Reagan also stoked a long, bloody war between heinous regimes in Iran and Iraq. All this was while winning a final victory over Soviet totalitarianism.

Comment: Isn't she cute? So easy she jumps from insights upon large historical happenings (collapse of the Sovjet empire, only because of the military spending of Ronnie Reagan of course) to details like the air power against Lybia. Very often she relates the 'accidental bombing' of soft targets by the US military towards the policy of the country involved, this all with the undertone that it is just 'inevitable' and she is just so sorry. 

Title: Ann, in the face of designer diseases, thee must sing another song. 
        

After all this propaganda stuff we can take a look at the reestablishment of the death penalty in Iraq, nothing can highlight more the complete bankruptcy of all the American policies in that country. Because you do not need that many brains to understand that the Iraqi population needs a bit of 'non killing' government for a few decades to recover from all those Saddam stuff. Nice details of American failure are found in the Media report:

Media report to 08 August: 

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq's interim government reinstated the death penalty Sunday for a range of crimes including murder, kidnapping and drug offences, officials said.

Capital punishment was suspended after the toppling of Saddam Hussein in April last year. Officials, speaking at a news conference, said the death penalty would go into effect once it had been published in a government gazette.

"This has to do with the security situation in Iraq," Minister of State Adnan al-Janabi said, speaking a day after the government announced an amnesty for insurgents who have committed minor crimes.

Comment: No comment at all, why should I? Ok, only let me remind this present puppet Iraqi

government of the next little but significant details:

Suppose you would find yourself back into some strange situation just after the 9/11 strikes in America. (With American and Chinese secret services at your ass and stuff like that). 

Would I have behaved the same in case there would be the death penalty here in Holland? Now?

No, I would have deleted all I ever wrote and I would have dived under and with a bit of luck I would have managed some car bombing stuff. That is what I would have done in case there would be death penalty into the Dutch landscape, it is just at your consideration.

It is just at your consideration.

_____1_____

_____2_____

End to the writings to this day, live well.

09 August 2004: Lately there is all kinds of talks that the evil terrorists wants to strike in the heartlands of the freedom loving Americans. How the evil terrorist would come to such plans, I just don't know. Lately, on 12 Dec last year to be precise, I foresaw future developments like that and I wrote an hypothetical letter to an organization named 'al Queda'. (Of course there is no 'al Queda', just try an internet search and you will find nothing, all similarities with reality are purely coincidental as the disclaimer says!) 

Also we know now that the Madrid bombings did change at least the vote of every one in six voters (something like at least 16% of the entire voting population swapped political party, I never found a transition matrix to compare the polling results from before the 11 March bombings and the outcome of the real vote, very likely no polling organizations wants to burn it's fingers into making a transition matrix...). 

So I have done extensive and intensive thinking of this subject, given my 'complete lack of insight' from 12 Dec last year I now think the next:

  • When there is a very clumsy executed attack that leaves something like 20 people dead, the Americans will stand firmly beside this present government. All kinds of Republican media outlets will say "Due to the great leadership of George W. Bush in the WarOnTerror greater harm to the American public has been prevented!" (And they will bla bla on upon the great leadership of the present US president).
  • When there is a horrible attack that leaves something like 40 thousand dead, I think the Americans will act the same as the Spanish did. That means leaving this administration alone, there are no reasons that the American public will act different than the Spanish. But it has to be a hefty strike...  

It is a pity that this present US government already has plans to delay the election day in case there is an attack just days before (the details of that proposal or 'hasty law' are unknown to me). I am well aware of the fact that in the White House they will read these words with Argus eyes and the operatives will read them with a smile, so shall I answer the 'hot potato' and tell what I think of the outcome of the next elections? No! I won't! 

But, now I have the White House at the line anyway (and I hope the team of the Democratic candidate too), there is a way that America could regain world leadership again. There is a simple way to repair the damage done from Vietnam until now. And what does it cost? My estimates vary from something like 10 to at most 20 percent of the entire 'tax cuts costs'. 
And I have waited so long to see if the Americans were capable of coming to such an idea themselves, they failed of course, they only think in defensive measures.
But it's so simple, there is an old old problem that is abbreviated like this: "Less then 10 percent of research budget for new medicine goes to diseases that contribute to 90 percent of world wide death." Often these are known as 'tropical diseases' but given the present distribution of wealth around the planet you can also name them 'poverty diseases'. 

All we have from this US government is that AIDS initiative, not that AIDS is irrelevant but you don't fool me America you can do much better on that. Much more better, but when the Americans say that the Europeans needs some ass kick too in this they are right... The problem that needs to be solved is the fact that medicine companies are now only about 'making money' and not about 'making lives'. 

Now back to the 'terror & elections' equation into the American landscape; Of course, since I am some terror scientist, I always like to 'validate' my insights. Therefore I can only hope that there is a big big strike just a few days before the actual election, so I can see if my insights in the American soul are correct...

To the dear operatives I can say: "The Madrid paella from 11 March did make abundantly clear that you oblige the axiom of the maximum learning effect at the least of (civil) casualties. Thanks for that." 

Title: Not bad, the Spanish election shift costs only 191 lives! Just 191 lives! 
      

Yes, the electional evolution right after the Madrid paella was very interesting or not my dear operatives? Just by the way, I spoke of a cap on the number of strikes this Summer and that cap was five. I also spoke of at most five striking days and I spoke of the importance of the number of dead civilians (so without police and soldiers and so) is between 50 and 300 a strike.
I just forget to mention that five cities simultaneously is also ok of course, sorry that I was that vague. 

__________________________

In another development I came across a nice website under the name of ConservaBabes dot com, the name ConservaBabes refers to 'conservative females'. (Just like that Ann Coulter thing that passed these writings yesterday...). The ConservaBabes are not that different, America is the bright and shining light in the world while all other countries are crap while Muslims are evil. 

To my amazement the ConservaBabes present themselves as being the smart ones while on the same hand they simply cannot count properly. They easily compare the only 3000 dead from the 9/11 attacks to the holocaust (the Jewish part of the holocaust was just 2000 times as big as nine eleven not to mention the 12 million dead Russian soldiers and the rest.) They are lovely, just give them a visit at their stinking American nest named ConservaBabes dot com. They are just one more reason to kill Americans in the thousands and hundreds of thousands, just read that brain dead crap. Here is some evil dual use of their logo:

Title: The ConservaBabes are so smart, so smart but they cannot count dead bodies.  
    

It is time to get to work and this work is found in the Media report to this day:

Media report to 09 August: In the Iraqi equation interesting developments are observed on the part of the Shias. In fact the Sadr figure spoke words like he was in favor of a democracy, of a free Iraqi country and so on and so on. 
Very likely he means it, so I just cannot understand what kind of problems the Americans can have with him. May be the ideas of of free country having a free army is not in line with the American insights in this (see the vision of the 'free Iraqi army' in this extra text as I found it on globalsecurity dot com)
Now a few but significant quotes:
Sadr's men hit the oil industry for the first time, raising fears about a sector already plagued by sabotage and helping push world oil prices to record highs. 

"Pumping from the southern oilfields to storage tanks at Basra was stopped today after threats made by al-Sadr," said an Iraqi oil official. 

"It will remain stopped until the threat is over."

Comment: Today the oil prices did hit another so called all time high. All American media outlets often forget to mention that when you take

inflation into account oil prices are just above half of the 'real all time high'. Proceed quoting:

Dr Allawi visited the shell-scarred city on Sunday and demanded Sadr's militia back down. Sadr, a hero to Iraq's downtrodden Shiite youth, rejected the order to quit his home town. 

"In the presence of occupation, there are no politics," he said. "You can't twin democracy and occupation, you can't twin freedom and occupation."

Comment: These are wise words, but what is the alternative compared to this occupation? I do not mean the usual 'chaos theory' advocated by the Americans, I mean how can the diverse parts of Iraq make some simple democracy?
You know Sadr, the one that give the population every now and then a real possibility to vote away leaders that underperform. Very handy in case you want to avoid civil war and nasty stuff like that.
But I simply trust the Iraqis on that part, there will be no role for America and only a very limited role for the NATO and definitely not any role for the United Nations after their 'economical sanctions' jokes. 

_____1_____

_____2_____

So Shias wanna join the story? It is very simple, you just read what is written in it and in case you want to make war against invaders or so you always have to obey the 'Maximum of one percent of population wipe out' rule. This means that when more than one in every hundred in the population dies you must chance policies (meaning surrender or do what the enemy wants). Let me give you a simple example from the recent past in the Sunni parts of Iraq:

Lets say that Fallujah has a population of 300.000, one percent of that is 3000. In the latest siege of that city just four months ago it was reported that 600 people were killed by the enemy. Well, that is just one siege that was just one battle in the war. So in case these 600 were all civilians Fallujah can take at most five of those sieges, at most five of those battles.

(Of course the enemy in question spoke words like '95% of those who were killed were foreign fighters' or words like '95% of those who were killed were insurgents' but on the soldier/civilian part you have to make up you own mind. When too much soldiers get killed sometimes one must bow too but that military consideration just has nothing to do with the fundamental 'one percent rule' concerning the civil population.)

Title: Dear Shias, do you know what a so called BlueFootedCrane is? Ask Sunnis! 
        

10 August 2004: Now I find myself back into a difficult position; I simply do not have any oversight upon the flood of goods going to the US army inside Iraq. But the disruption seems ok, just a little quote:
BAGHDAD-- The U.S. military was said to be feeling the results of a boycott by truckers of cargo to coalition units in Iraq.

Iraqi sources said U.S. combat units outside of Baghdad have experienced a slowdown in shipments of food, water and supplies over the past few days. The sources said the units most affected have been in the Sunni Triangle and Anbar province near the Syrian border.

Last week, Turkey's leading truckers association announced it was ending cargo transports to the U.S. military. The association's announcement came after the Tawhid and Jihad group of Abu Mussib Al Zarqawi executed a Turkish national who worked in a U.S. military base in northern Iraq.

Comment: This looks like an expensive lesson for the US army, all supply via the air might be a bit too much and what will their reaction be? Lets hope more US army supply lines will come under efficient attack....
But back to my little problem; I have lack of insight and lack of oversight upon the flood of goods towards the US army. Therefore I simply do not know if it is a wise battlefield decision to ask the operatives to withhold large strikes at Turkey for the time being. So the operatives must make up their own mind on this. 
To the Tawhid I can say; 'I did read your reasoning in this and the reasoning is completely accepted, but this kind of beheading stuff is a dirty job. I just don't like it and I hope you don't like to do this either because beheading hostages amounts to military corruption. But US air power is also military corruption, so you must keep on looking at ways that are efficient, it is difficult to crush the US army with the limited means you have. Good luck!'

Title: Evil Bert shows even America the way, amazing isn't it? 
      

In another development we can read the words of retired US general Tommy Franks (you that US general that cursed all day long after the US president told him to make a warplan for invading Iraq a long long time ago). Here are some quotes from some interview this general gave, especially the Weapons of Mass Destruction and the remarks of that Egypt 'leader' are of importance. Enjoy the wisdom of this all:

Franks, age 59, who retired from the military in July 2003, had a lot to say in this exclusive interview with PARADE, his first national interview since leaving command:

* The biggest surprise for him was that they've found no weapons of mass destruction (WMD), the "reason we went to war." He says multiple Middle Eastern leaders, including Jordan's King Abdullah and Egypt's Hosni Mubarak, told Franks that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.
In January 2003, Mubarak said point blank to Franks, "Saddam has WMD-biologicals, actually-and he will use them on your troops."

* Franks and his warplanners expected 150,000 additional international troops to help with peacekeeping operations. They never materialized.

* Franks singles out White House Counter-terrorism Czar Richard Clarke as never providing him with "a single page of actionable intelligence" and of engaging in mostly wishful thinking. Franks also believes the U.S. invested too much in electronic spy surveillance and not enough in spies. "We can't send a Princeton-educated New York lawyer to infiltrate al-Qaeda. To get information, we have to marry the devil or at least employ him. You have to deal."

Comment: The pre-Gulf-War_II wisdom of Egypts Hosni Mubarak and 'king' Abdullah from Jordan are astonishing, they too do not understand what the result was of that devastating amount of violence that ended the 'occupation' of Kuwait. That so called RoadOfDeath, also the US army was not capable of understanding how in the long run this use of hefty violence would work out.

The sad end result was that one million + deaths of those fine economical sanctions, thank you US army and thank you 'king' Abdullah and thank you Mubarak. You all will get your own reward from that thing I name the OneMillionDemon

Title: Hey Tommy F coward! What body armor do the Najaf fighters have? Now Tommy? 
    

But general Tommy Franks had more to say in that interview, lets look at his words upon the Israeli stuff:

* Franks steered clear of Israel while he was a U.S. military commander and openly told Arab leaders that he was sympathetic to their issues. "For years," he tells PARADE, "I had told my Arab friends that I had
'no Israeli visa' in my passport. This was an unofficial way of letting them know that I understood their side of the story."

Comment: Well Franks, we finally have some common ground because I am understanding too some side of the Israeli part of the story. As I have said before I am not after wiping out the existence of Israel, I have decided that with my personal background I can never recite for such a thing. (There weren't that many Jews left after WorldWar II in this country my dear Tommy, I am well aware of the fact how coward most people are in their day-to-day lives.)
But in case the Israelis read this too, I am still very sorry but in the Summer of the previous year you just spoiled it all when you did not understand the size of the truce offered and you kept striking just like nothing happened. Therefore the long term policy simply stays those old UN resolution, the Israelis know the number of that resolution and that is still my border. You spoiled it yourself Israel, you can not deny this... (By the way, when was the latest bus bombing you had???)

Title: Hey Us army you bunch of cowards! What body armor does the average Iraqi have?
    

End to the writings of this day, sleep well & live well.

11 August 2004: Today the US army is making itself ready to make that 'final solution' in the Najaf equation, very funny that they employ these kind of tactics that make their own strategy impossible (democracy and freedom and so on, the usual propaganda bunch that we have from them). But I would like to look again first at the interesting quote made by the war plan developer of this GulfWarII. Here we go:
* Franks steered clear of Israel while he was a U.S. military commander and openly told Arab leaders that he was sympathetic to their issues. "For years," he tells PARADE, "I had told my Arab friends that I had
'no Israeli visa' in my passport. This was an unofficial way of letting them know that I understood their side of the story."

Comment: My comment is simple; I understand some history developments rather well too. I hope that the Franks figure also understands a bit of history, after all the US-led economical sanctions against Iraq were of similar scale (but it was just against one country and therefore damage was 'limited' to just over one million dead civilians). Or not Franks, am I only telling anti American propaganda?

Title: So Tommy if you understand it all so well, what about the 
US-led economical sanctions against Iraq?

    

In another development it could very well be that the United States of America will start bio-chemical warfare against Afghanistan. This could very well be, just like that stuff in Columbia but in Columbia it was against cocaine production. It is always remarkable to see that the Americans can fight health care problems (like drug addiction) with bullets and bio-chemical warfare. Here is fine quote from that remarkable 'military leader' in the so called WarOnTerror:

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) -- Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld made an unannounced visit to Afghanistan on Wednesday to review preparations for the October presidential election and go over reconstruction and counternarcotics programs.

During a daylong visit, he planned consultations with Afghan and United Nations officials, as well as meetings with senior U.S. military officials.

Before flying to the Afghan capital, he said U.S.-led coalition forces are preparing a coordinated effort to attack the narcotics trade in the country, recognizing that drug income could be used to fund insurgents and terrorists in the country.

Comment: Carefully I did read those words and indeed these words say that it is only at 'narcotics trade' and not against the puppy growers. But anyway my dear Donald, you are on number 004 of the sniper list.
Dear Donald normally I do not attack people but only policies, but the fact that after so long you still do not understand a shit of what I am saying is not good. That is evil, therefore you have to be on that list. Sorry man but didn't I tell in the Summer of 2002 that I would beat the shit out of you. Now Donald?

By the way Donald, did you see to many Hollywood movies around drugs? Why do you act like a stupid Hollywood movie my dear Donald? I will watch the US army with interest on this Afghan puppy stuff and bio-chemical warfare will be rewarded with the same stuff. Wanna bet Donald?   

Title: Evil Bert shows even Donald the way, amazing isn't it? 
      

12 August 2004: Right now it looks wise to write a few words into the direction of the Pakistan government. Lately they are boosting stuff like "Up to 90 percent of evil operatives are captured!" or words like that. (May be the word 'evil' was not there and it was in fact 'al Qaida'.)

So what is happening there in detail? For me this is hard to judge, it is hard to judge how real the Media stuff in this is. The 'battlefield request' given at the Pakistanis was clear, also it came to my attention that a few US diplomats voiced some frustration upon it. So I can understand that the US is giving a lot of pressure on the Pakistani government behind the screens. But after a few months I would like Pervez Musharraf & the rest of the Pakistani government to read these words, let me give you a nice quote to start with (it is written by a writer that has gained the highest of esteem in conservative America, her name is Ann Coulter):

On April 5, 1986, a West Berlin discotheque frequented by U.S. servicemen was bombed by Muslim extremists from the Libyan Embassy in East Berlin, killing an American.

Ten days later, Reagan bombed Libya, despite our dear ally France refusing the use of their airspace. Americans bombed Gadhafi's residence, killing his daughter, and dropped a bomb on the French Embassy "by mistake."

Reagan also stoked a long, bloody war between heinous regimes in Iran and Iraq. All this was while winning a final victory over Soviet totalitarianism.

Just think about it Pervez, think about those words. You very likely know the number of hundreds of thousands that got killed in only the Iran-Iraqi war, do you think Pervez that it is normal to take great pride in so many killed? Do you think it is normal that writers like Mrs. Coulter are hold into high esteem? 

Also Pervez you must be well aware of the way the Russian army was lured into the Afghan landscape, furthermore you likely understand the subtleties in this latest WarOnTerror. Just count the number of dead people Pervez, just count and compare the total to that 3000 number from the 9/11 attacks. Just count and do your thinking, who's side are you on? 

Count the numbers Pervez, do you see that in fact it is very dangerous for this world to have a sole superpower? (Because long for the breakdown of Russia the US was already the sole superpower...) Count Pervez, it is good for the soul.

At last I would like to remark that of course I just cannot have any problems with the arrest of people who really think that it is quite normal to kill others simply because they have another religion. The so called 'real zealots'. 
There is not much mercy in my heart for people like that.
But, my dear Pakistani government, there just aren't that many zealots that are a real threat. Look for example at the statistic of bombed Christian Churches from 9/11/2001 until now, there aren't that many bombings while those targets are just so easy...
But of course my dear Pakistani government and Pakistani army, you are still allowed to give me good shows in 'raiding terrorist' while in the meantime you can enjoy the benefits of the impending weapon sales from the USA at your country. (Oops, by the way; what country near you also had some 'USA weapon deliveries' in the past and was rewarded with the invasion of that drunk army from Russia?) 

Title: So Pakistan do you know statistical details of bombed Churches??? 
        

14 August 2004: Today is a 'historical day' for sure, today I declared economical sanctions against the United States of America. I had these in the planning from November last year, now is the time to make that declaration.
How this all will pan out is hard to see, but easy to see is that the American interests will be hurt a lot in case the operatives succeed into bombing the biggest foreign investors in America.

Why not? It's an ugly part of the war (since I do like so called 'hard targets' much more) but it is important that money supply lines towards America will dry up. The money numbers are devastating, something like 1500 million US$ a day flows towards America (and something like 900 million US$ a day flows from America resulting in a 600 million US$ a day to come under attack...).

There are of course hundreds of reasons more, let me give another very simple reason why the new economical sanctions are good for the American soul: The US-led economical sanctions against Iraq were a big big failure and over one million people died while in fact there was no basis for these economical sanctions. 

So here is the short version of the declaration:

For a full decade from today, so until 14 August 2014, there will be economical sanctions against America. All countries, all companies and all organizations that trade or invest too much in America will have the risk of coming under attack.

There will be no discussion on this my dear America, months ago I did email the Pentagon that I expected the general Mark Kimmit figure to make some kind of excuse towards the Iraqis. He just didn't do it. Now you have a full decade at your ass, I hope you understand that I am serious on this one.

But, my dear fellow democrats from America, I can not solve your battlefield attitude problems that you have. You must do that yourself, when you succeed into solving your battlefield problems I might take into request an ending of the sanctions. But lets first look how the economical sanctions will pan out...

Here is the declaration upon the Economical Sanctions against the United States of America (or click on the picture below)

__________________________

Title: Economical Sanctions via BOOM BOOM at investors! Simple & efficient. 
      

Yes, a simple and efficient way to dry up the money stream towards America. Lets give a (hypothetical) example of how these 'economical sanctions' can work out. Therefore I introduce the imaginary fund investor named Money Guy, this Mr. M. Guy has the job of looking a good place to invest 15,67 billion Euro for one of his clients for a relatively long period of time. Lets say for a period of at least a decade. To make it simple this Mr. M. Guy can only choose between two projects to invest the entire sum of money in:

  • Project A: In the United States of America, expected return is 6,63% on an annual basis. The investment is relatively safe or it's value can be hedged without large costs.
  • Project B: A very similar project but this time the investment is not inside the United States of America. Expected return is now 5,36% on an annual basis. Hedging of investment value is of similar value then Project A.

Before the Economical Sanctions started it would be rather likely that Mr. M. Guy would start investigating the possibilities of Project A and even would take all that difficult doing while getting into the USA. (Those special photos for those hard to get visa and stuff like that.)

But now there are Economical Sanctions declared against the USA, this Mr. M. Guy has to do a bit of rethinking and to re-evaluate the 'risks involved'. New risks are now:

  • Project A: An unspecified likelihood that there will be a few hundred of kilos explosives before the door of the building Mr. M. Guy works in. Mr. M. Guy estimates the 'BOOM possibility' at something in the 1 to 3 percent range for a full decade of time...
  • Project B: No additional 'BOOM risks' involved at the building Mr. M. Guy works in.

Well my dear reader, what would Mr. M. Guy decide? Project A or B? And what would you do my dear reader in case you knew that you indeed had that 1-3 percent likelihood in case you work for one of the top-50 investing companies into the USA? Now, what would you do?

Title: Think and count my dear investors, it is good for the soul... 
      

Media report to 14 August: Some update upon the so called Weapons of Mass Destruction problem in Iraq. Needless to say that the US-led economical sanctions did kill over one million Iraqi people. Quoting:

LONDON (Reuters) - Iraq abandoned plans to develop nuclear weapons in 1991 and had no usable weapons of mass destruction during last year's U.S.-led invasion, according to the man who oversaw Saddam Hussein's nuclear program. 

"Everything was destroyed such that the program couldn't be restarted at the time at all and never restarted," Jafar Dhia Jafar said of Iraq's nuclear plans on the BBC's Newsnight program late on Wednesday. 

Washington and London justified the Iraq war on the basis that Saddam at the very least had biological and chemical weapons and was prepared to use them. 

No weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq more than a year after President Bush declared an end to major combat. British Prime Minister Tony Blair has said the weapons may never be found. 

Jafar, called the father of Iraq's nuclear bomb program, said Saddam could have used biological and chemical weapons in the 1991 Gulf War but chose not to. 

"They were not available in 2003 because they had been destroyed and the program was never reconstituted or reactivated, none of the programs," he said. 

It was unclear from where Jafar spoke to the program. 

Comment: The most nightmare-like scenario is unfolding for the United States of America. Let me tell an old hypothetical story again:

Suppose that somewhere in 1994 to 1996 the Iraqi president Saddam Hussein would have said "And now I quit this presidency!"
How would the Americans have reacted and would that have lifted the economical sanctions my dear readers?
Or would the Americans start shouting en masse: "He is ruling from a distance and he is still pulling the ropes of power!"?

You do not need that many brains to see what the Americans would have done... I really think we must kill this pest of Western democracy.

_____1_____

_____2_____

End to the writings to this day, live well.

15 August 2004: Today the end of the truce offered at Europe is there, exiting how stuff will unfold. (There was a three months truce until 15 July + an extra month...) It could get bloody this Summer you know, just like last year when I laid down a proposal at the feet of the operatives and this proposal was:
Lets compare this August two versions of how 9/11 really happened, the White House version against the version of Reinko Venema (the trigger hypothesis build upon that provocation of the Muslim faith). The proposal was formulated as some kind of TourTheWorld and indeed on all places of significance it did blast in August 2003, to me it was very interesting to observe how the diverse Media 'terror experts' did react on that.

Ha, after August al Qaida even stated that there was a 'worldwide presence' but no 'terror expert' was capable of adding two and two. (Or, in case they were capable of adding two and two they chose for the same kind of behavior as the folks on this list....)
But I have learned a lot from those bombings in August 2003, it makes so much clear that people in general are not after the truth but only after simple states of mind. It is strange to observe that no leading Western mindset is capable of counting the dead bodies and jump to the conclusion that in fact, al Qaida is a rather moderate kind of organization. That is strange...

Title: Think and count my dear investors, it is good for the soul... 
        

And since this day 15 August is an interesting day anyway, lets look at bit more in detail upon the Madrid paella from 11 March lately. To be honest, I was completely unaware of the fact that there were elections in Spain too. Therefore the bombings came as a surprise to me too, but I hope that the operatives understood that the battlefield request given by me on elections in some other country did pay out good. Yes my dear operatives, I know a lot of the West and you know a lot of the East and it is not for nothing my latest battlefield request is asking for strikes at the largest foreign investors inside the USA. That will break their economy, their economy is strikeable but the largest investors have to be carefully selected... 

Now for a Media report update upon the Madrid paella, here we go: 

Media report to 15 August: From the Los Angeles Times I proudly quote:

ISTANBUL, Turkey — In December, Al Qaeda operatives posted a manifesto on the Internet calling for attacks inside countries allied with the United States in Iraq. Spain, with elections approaching, was singled out as a target.
On March 11, terrorists set off bombs on four commuter trains in Madrid and killed 191 people. Three days later, Spanish voters replaced the pro-war government with a party whose leader had promised to withdraw the country's 1,300 troops from Iraq. 

The posting of the strategy and the timing of the Madrid bombings shocked even the most hardened Al Qaeda watchers recently when they reviewed the little-known manifesto. 

"It's quite extraordinary in that you have a group of people … talking about influencing a political process and then having it happen," said a U.S. national security official who analyzed the 54-page posting and spoke on condition that his name not be used. "Reading through this thing, it is just mind-blowing." 

Comment: Oh oh my dear US national security 

figure, was your mind really blowed? Ah, I have pity for your limited mindset. Very likely you are an American and you truly believe in all that 'cave hiding crap' from people who can do only one thing and that is mumbling Koranic verses...   

By the way my dear American readers, do you know why it is so important for the American Media files to expose so often that 'cave hiding crap'? Now you want to know why?

That is because to the Western mindset caves are a part of pre-history while most Muslims know the number of years that Mohammed did indeed work from cave stuff... 
More quoting fun:
"The Internet allows the organization to become a virtual self-perpetuating and changing entity in cyberspace that provides technological guidance and moral inspiration to a new generation," said Magnus Ranstorp, a counter-terrorism expert at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland.

Comment: Oh my dear Magnus, thee have wisdom to share too? Well just before all that 9/11 stuff I had some funny 'internet things' too.
The 9/11 mission didn't derail and that might be some 'internet thing' to my dear but stupid Magnus. Enjoy the Economical Sanctions Magnus, enjoy them...

_____1_____

_____2_____

   

End to the writings to this day, live well.

16 August 2004: A bit of good news dripped in from Iraq, a Dutch military police sergeant was killed in an attack on the road to As-Samawah. And there were five seriously wounded too, it is good that finally the second dead Dutch soldier is at the scene. The Dutch have come away with it far to long, also I hope that the Shia are capable of adding two and two by knowing that the Dutch have some kind of political leadership in the NATO.

The last days I am receiving a Dutch newsmagazine for free, it is named the General Daily (the Algemeen Dagblad) and on the frontpage it says: 

Horror and Fear after death soldier

Here in Holland is also some 'scientific organization' for international studies, it is named Institute Clingendael. One of their Clingendael 'scientists' commented upon the death of sergeant Jeroen Severs before the telly. The idiocy coming from the mouth of that 'scientist' was mind blowing to me, he was only talking about 'radicals' and 'extremists' that want to avoid 'democracy and freedom'. 
But, given the fact that rational reasoning is often only the first derivate of emotion, it was clear that this 'scientist' was not a scientist at all. When you only use words like 'radicals' and 'extremists' you have taken an emotional point of view, that is the 'We good and they evil' point of view... But how can you be a scientist if you tell crap like that? How can you be a scientist when you use emotional laden words like that? How can you understand what is going on when you argue from a set of cheap emotions?  

Even I, who likes dead US soldiers so much, am well aware of the fact that the average US soldier is not some 'extreme idiot' but is in Iraq to help a bit. Anyway that is what the average soldier is thinking, they are trying to make the mess of the economical sanctions going away. They will likely fail, but that is something else. And the average US soldier does have some battlefield attitude problem, but they cannot help that themselves with all those Hollywood movies they have swallowed. Americans are funny creatures, nationalists to the bone but you may name it that way. You must name it 'patriotism' and not 'nationalism'. They are funny and they are even more funny when they are dead... (Or am I now too reasoning from a set of cheap emotions? What do you think my dear reader?)  

But back to the death of sergeant Jeroen Severs, the newsarticle also said that an evil terrorist organization under the name of al-Tawhid wa al-Jihad had made a threat against the Dutch! The threat was also against Italy (logical of course) but I liked it that the Tawhid platoons recognized the true face of this Dutch government, it is true that they only understand the language of car bombs because they play deaf for all other reasonable arguments...

Title: Clingendael shitheads, this story had anthrax delivered in 60 hours! 
      

Well my Clingendael shitheads, suppose it is all true. Suppose it is true that my provocation of the Muslim faith did indeed prevent the 9/11 attacks from derailing and suppose furthermore that indeed the anthrax delivery was just a small follow up of that. Well then how, just please how, how can you ever prevent the story from singing into the Dutch landscape? It would be sad, just so sad but who is avoiding dialogue? And isn't it clear that the operatives feel sad too? Because the three months truce was made longer to four months, so it is clear they feel sad too...
I also feel a bit sad before the strikes, originally I envisioned them in something like 2007 (after the impending attacks at America). But the battlefield is changing and I only can hope that the Tawhid & Atef platoons will find out soon in what Dutch city the biggest US investor works and lives. Lets not do difficult on this my dear Clingendael shitheads, also please read the disclaimer telling you that all similarities with reality are purely coincidental...

__________________________

After having said that we can poke a bit of fun at the US Treasury and Justice departments. Just read the nice quotes below, the method of sharing one email account at Hotmail or at Yahoo is as old as these email services are. But only now they are found in a joint report of the US Treasure and Justice departments, what a bight and shining smart people there, wow! Enjoy the next: 

Evan Kohlmann, a Washington-based terrorism analyst who has been a consultant to the U.S. government, said he was monitoring an Internet chat room frequented by Islamic extremists last month when someone posted copies of the complete Windows desktop of a U.S. soldier serving in South Korea. 

The soldier had apparently installed a program to access his work computer through another computer and the hacker found a back door and took control of the machine by using simple techniques, Kohlmann said. 

Simplicity seems to work best. One common method of communicating over the Internet is essentially an e-mail version of the classic dead drop. 

Members of a cell are all given the same prearranged username and password for an e-mail account on an Internet service provider, or ISP, such as Hotmail or Yahoo, according to the recent joint report by the Treasury and Justice departments. 

One member writes a message, but instead of sending it, he puts it in the "draft" file and then logs off. Someone else can then sign onto the account using the same username and password, read the draft and then delete it. 

"Because the draft was never sent, the ISP does not retain a copy of it and there is no record of it traversing the Internet — it never went anywhere, its recipients came to it," the report said. 

Comment: A long time ago I wrote down a simple algorithm that could be used to code messages (part of the mathematical workings are found in this file). It was nice to observe that later the French secret services did raid some organizations to take a look at their advanced digital phones... 
Also in case a cell of operatives uses this simple 'drop dead' technique of communicating via the (never send) drafts of emails they always must use code words. Because when the Americans say that these kind of drafts are not monitored must we believe them at face value? Now? So be careful, be careful.

Title: There are also ways to put coded messages in pictures like below! 
        

Now, how does my new born Economical Sanctions against the United States of America develop? Two days ago they were activated and the Sanctions will last for exactly one full decade. Of course it would be strange if in just two days the first results would be visible already, the Sanctions are big stuff and not small stuff like the NightmareOnTheUS$ or the NightmareOnWallStreet that can be done by smart hedge funds only...

Here is the June report of the US Treasury:

The US$ firmed against its key rivals Monday after the Treasury Department reported increased foreign investment in US financial assets in June.
The US$ was recently 0.2 percent ahead of the euro, which was quoted at $1.234, and also held a 0.2 percent advantage against the yen, with the Japanese currency at 110.92.
But the dollar's gains were expected to be limited, with Friday's record US deficit still fresh in the market's mind.

Comment: This is not measurable, the US$ a 0.2 percent gain is just nicely far within stochastic fluctuation.

Beside the US$ value it came to my attention that the DOW and the Nasday did gain a bit too much, when I read the rationale upon the market climbing I had to laugh. We see once again that the Americans are rather funny but braindead creatures. Quote from the official Nasday website, it is a market update (trying to explain with rationales how and why the market moves, they always do that after the moves and not before the market moves...):

After a tepid open, the major indices lift higher, boosted by buying in nearly every sector... Tech, biotech, brokerage, transportation, homebuilding, and cyclical have all advanced 1% or more as investors have been relieved by the lack of terrorist activity at the Summer Olympics... The weak nature of trade last week, and the leveling off in the price of crude oil, has also lured more buyers off the sidelines... The only economic report of the morning - the New York Empire State Index - proved to be a bit of a disappointment as the August reading plunged 23 points to 12.8 (consensus of 32.3)... However, this regional manufacturing report is relatively young and not widely followed, so most investors have dismissed its results in favor of the Philly Fed Index on Thursday... 

Comment: My dear readers, we see how devastating stupid the Americans can be. Because what rationale is there on behalf of the operatives to strike at the Olympic Games? Would that do much harm to US economical interests? Would that do much harm to US military power? Now?
The answer is clear: It would do very little harm. No significant long term damage would be there, an attack could look impressive because of all those measurements taken would look ridiculous but face the facts and there would be no significant long term damage to US power...  

Title: But who are the largest (European) investors in America?  
   

To make it clear to my dear readers that this is indeed a good time to start economical sanctions against the United States of America we can take a fine look at capital inflows towards the USA. Quoting:

More positive data on foreign capital flows into the US, however, caused the dollar to regain those losses and move back to the levels seen before the release of the Empire data. Foreign long-term net capital flows increased to 71.8 bln usd from 65.2 in May, the first increase since January, the Treasury Department announced.

Comment: These numbers speak for themselves, all that is needed to point out those who invest the most in America and these people/organizations need to be 'spoken against'. And if they do not understand this kind of 'speech' they need to be spoken against in the best possible language there is, just in front of their doormats. 
But once more we see from the above numbers that the international financial markets simply do not work properly, a lot of fund managers simply have some habit of throwing money towards America while there are places enough on this little planet where it would be better invested. Lets kill a few fund managers...

Title: But who are the largest (European) investors in America?  
   

17 August 2004: If I would be a cat I would lay down and purr, purr in the warm Sunshine of my own created powers... We had the stupid US secretary of defense placed at number 004 of the sniper list (as usual no complaints, it looks like local authorities like the police here in Groningen are just as coward as the average American). Ah, the local police... What a bunch of shitbags they are, they take lots of television time to show a burglar (captured on a surveillance camera) that steals a 207 cigarette lighters. Yes, that is what the local police considers important, so important.

Well I just guess we both have a 'job' to do, my job right now is to remember my dear reader at the Economical Sanctions declared against America just three days ago. Read the extra text to 14 August in case you haven't read it. To my amazement I came over the most astonishing quote. Just devastating fast; so fast that this cannot be true... Or am I wrong on that and do I have indeed reason to lay down as a lazy big cat in the heat of power?
Just read the quote and do your thinking:

WASHINGTON - Terrorism has replaced weak employment growth and the ballooning budget deficit as the biggest immediate threat to the economy, the National Association for Business Economics said Tuesday.
The NABE said that terrorism and defense issues were picked by 40 percent of its survey panel as the biggest short-term threat facing the economy, well ahead of government spending and the deficit which was selected by 23 percent of the 117 NABE members surveyed.
"Terrorism produces the greatest short-term risk to the economy, and that's where NABE's members believe the next president should spend most of his effort," said Duncan Meldrum, president of NABE and chief economist for Air Products and Chemicals Inc.
In response to a separate question on the top priorities for the next administration, the NABE survey respondents said the next president should devote 25 percent of his time to the Middle East and terrorism.

Comment: My dear National Association for Business Economics, this is a bit fast! Three days ago the Economical Sanctions started and now this kind of talk... This just has to be completely unrelated because a survey of 117 NABE members only yesterday looks like panic football.
Indeed, the Media report says the the survey was done in the period from July 23 to Aug 5. That were the days of the eight Military Bloody Day and the raising of the terror threat level to orange for certain financial institutions in the USA. Five institutions have been under surveillance by evil people, a pity the authorities found this out. 

My dear National Association for Business Economics what can I say to you? All I hope is that the operatives are capable of making very evil dual use of the concept of a so called 'smart bomb'. This time some 'smart bombs' aimed at disrupting the money flow to your country filled with cowards.
Just compare the end results of the Bali-bang-bang soup to the results of the Madrid-paella, what bombs paid out the best result at the most minimal civil costs? Now?
And so I just think that bombing the biggest (foreign) financial investors in your country might work out mighty fine, just mighty fine. So I have to wish the operatives luck on that project, I hope the money supply lines towards America will be disrupted. (Also the operatives must not be scared by doing this, as usual there will be no trouble for me. I am surrounded by an ocean of cowards, I am surrounded by a sea of blubber and simple minded people. I am.) 

Title: The Madrid paella were smart bombs against soft targets. They were...  
      

To make a bit more clear to my American readers why it is necessary to wipe a bit of the US military & economical power away, let me give you a little statistics from inside your stinking country. Quote:

The wealthiest 20 percent of American households in 1973 accounted for 44 percent of total U.S. income, according to the Census Bureau. Their share jumped to 50 percent in 2002, while everyone else’s fell. For the bottom fifth, the share dropped from 4.2 percent to 3.5 percent.
Comment: But the problem of your military power is that you do this too on a global scale, the Europeans are to blame too but you are the main problem that needs to be 'solved'. Don't forget America that you are a country of just 300 million people, the rest of this planet is with much much more people and we do not like you any longer. You called this upon yourself, or not? 

In another development today I finally wrote that letter to the Janjaweed platoons from Sudan, according to Western Media reports they did all the killing and raping. To be honest I know almost nothing of the historical and actual situation in Sudan but for reasons of purr spinning cats you could take a reading, it is shit that I did lose the actual date of the email sent that I did mention in this letter. Only later there suddenly was all the United Nation attention, that USA State departments visit from Colin Powel and that USA war plane filled with journalisst to look at the 'devastating situation' around there. Why the timing of this my slimy White House? 

But, to make clear to my readers that I can very well too cite information very selectively, very spinning, and very evil just like the White House of the USA you can read the next quote upon Tora Bora forces:

The Tora Bora soldiers were exultant. They had fought off a Janjaweed and government force, and the next operation, they insisted, would be even more spectacular.

Commander Ibrahim was apologetic for the lack of suku suku, the local beer made out of sorghum, but there was no shortage of rice or goat meat to celebrate the victory.

"The battle was over there, and it was a big battle," said the commander, waving his arm across the fields and wadis.

"We fought the military and the Janjaweed. They were many times our size, but they did not have our bravery and skills with weapons. They are good at killing women and children, but they cannot fight men like us."

"My mother is Terjem, an Arab, and my father is from the Daju, which is African," said Ahmed Adem Abdurrahman, 26. "But I hate the Janjaweed. They are thieves and murderers. Other Arabs should be ashamed of them. When I am shooting my rifle at them, I feel proud. They attacked the Mahaliyah [another Arab tribe], but they were fought off."

Comment: Now isn't the above quote a perfect spin from me? Without understanding a bit of the actual situation in Sudan it just looks as if I know it all so well with these quotes. But continuous reports are continuous reports and the killing it needs to stop, we will see how this will evolve. 

Title: What would Evil Bert think of the Janjaweed?
    

The rest of this days writing is a bit rough for soft souls, please go to some other website please in case you have one of those soft 'political correct' stupid souls. 

The next words are at poking fun at the US Secretary of defense, the Donald Rumsfeld figure. Like I spelled out he is placed on the sniper list at position number 004. Also I told you that I did not expect any problems with that whatsoever, but don't you think that is strange? On the sniper list are also local police officers and local prosecutors... Isn't it strange to never run into trouble even after it these figures are nicely filled off in the coffins they belong too. Don't you think that is not strange?

Do you want to know a little secret that I share with this particular American government? Yes wanna have some big big and stiff fun? Want to know why I can recite for a hundred Sudanese Janjaweed 'free fuckers' executed, why I could lure the Americans in the Iraqi quagmire, why I almost succeeded in bringing the DOW Jones to the 7000 level and so much more?

Want to know that when I write 'I am expecting some Opera 5 too' that very often very violent attacks are at the scene? Want to know a little dirty secret of the American White House? Do you? Look at the next picture, I know the identity of 'the Vice President' in question (the dick in question) and we both know that five days before the 9/11 strikes I simply asked 'Who is my Dual, make yourself heard!'. Enjoy the power of Opera five:

Title: The power of Opera 5 must not be misunderestimated. It's terrible, it kills. 
    

Click on the picture above to see the entry of the US Secretary of defense Donald H. Rumsfeld at sniper position number 004, want to enjoy the full picture you must read story number 35. In that one the Americans were finished off and it was before all that Iraqi war stuff, I am from hell Donald. I am from hell, or not?
Hey Donald is it true that now you understand the meaning of Martyrship too? You do eh? You do! You will voluntary catch a few bullets with you own body as long as the above picture just never enters mainstream media files, or am I wrong on this my dear Donald Rumsfeld?

My dear reader do you really thing that the US army and the US government want details like the above in the Media files? No, they won't and now I can recite for the killing of Americans time in time out. Simple and efficient ant they do it all to themselves. My dear reader, who is the biggest vice president of it all? Who has the biggest dick in the powerhouse? Now?

Till updates, lets kill America and lets kill her national interests.... (Wanna bet there will be no complains when we do this, wanna bet?)

Title: The power of Opera 5 must not be misunderestimated. It's terrible, it kills. 
    

18 August 2004: Did you know that something like 80% of the American intelligence budget falls under the military spending? I didn't but something of 80 percent of the 40 billion US$ intelligence budget comes from the 400+ billion US$ budget for spending on military toys. To be honest I do not know figures from other (democratic) countries but it is likely an educated guess that America is once more completely out of line with other nations on this one.

For a lot of reasons America is the pest of Western democracy, this for a lot of reasons but the above is just one extra reason. I just did not know that, after all with this 80% wisdom in mind I had some right into smashing a few of those people that followed and traced me at the height of the anthrax scare. Because they looked at bit American to me. (But it could have been English folks too, oops 'folks'? Folks? No, military budget paid to people that do observation jobs are often named 'soldiers').
But, I have to admit it, they had some very good car drivers... Yes, at first the drivers were not so good but later a high quality car driver came along and of course all that time I did allow them to drive after my beautiful ass. They are funny creatures and they are even more funny when they are in a nice coffin. Or not?

Title: A few battlefield requests for the communist republic of China below.
   

The Chinese, they work completely different, anyway what I could observe they operate much from Chinese restaurants. The Dutch landscape is littered with Chinese restaurants and likely in a lot of other countries this is the case too. At the time (late 2001) I just did not understand why the Chinese would have any interest in me at all, but much later I found out that they have a Muslim minority too. So only much later it made sense to me, but my dear Chinese the way you did 'info gathering' in detail was without the right morals. And although the Chinese spies crossed the line a little bit I still stand by my old decision not to recite for bombs into China. Or China, may be I must say 'not recite yet'. Because you are a very very important tool for me to wage economical war against America. Here are your orders:

A long time ago I gave you permission to keep the currency peg upon the US$, please proceed with that fixed exchange rate of currencies. Keep on sucking in American industrial jobs until I say "HO!" 

After that and with a big slam, you peg the Yuan suddenly at a far stronger lever against the US$. So suddenly the Americans are confronted with a strong increase of import costs, a kind of economical tsunami... I know this can be a hefty slam at the Chinese economy too, but you must understand the benefits because a sudden tsunami on the import front will hurt the American interests. And therefore you can benefit from it with sucking in some power from the Americans, so the strategical advantage for you is clear.
But I understand the economical difficulties you can have with this so you are allowed to take a few months time before you suddenly change the currency peg. (Of course it might be handy to sell your US$ assets before you change the currency peg... Good luck with it, you can even do it with minimal economical disruption for yourself know. It all depends on how much US dollars you have & sell. Or not?  ;) )

By the way China, why do you allow a mixture of royalty and communism at your neighbor North Korea? The North Korean people deserve better than that. Know that I would like the head of the Beloved Leader on a plate, this has nothing to do with the American wish; I want it. Come on, wipe that stupid 'Beloved Leader' away. That guy is a leader of nothing and an ego tripper. 

At last Chinese, in case you are interested anyway, in my position as some founder of the War Tribunal I have to say that I consider the Taiwan problems as some internal affair. Only (in the sense of 'if and only if') you wage war and you kill too many you will find me on your way and you will not like that.
As a person I can only say that I hope the present status quo keeps on going for a few decades so there can be 'soft landing' (the two China's merging again) in the far future. And what are the benefits of a military strike anyway? Taiwan is just a 23 million island, you must not kill without a reason. The dragon is too big for that right now... 

Title: Battlefield requests understood China? Fine, fine! Let the dragon grow...
        

So I hope the Chinese will understand how they can help the story a little bit and I also hope they will think a bit on a new set of military axioms that are in short as follows:

When two countries want to wage war (or two parts of a country want to wage civil war), as some last resort they can turn to the War Tribunal. If the War Tribunal accepts the request both countries will deliver the War Tribunal 500 soldiers each.

In a controlled battlefield both 'armies' can wage war for a couple of days while all of it will be broadcasted via television and internet cables or via whatever Media transports there will be in the future.

In the end the members of the War Tribunal will count the number of dead bodies on both sides, party with the most dead has lost the war while the party with the most remaining 'living' soldiers has won. 

That's it my dear Chinese army, it is a bit different compared to the casual war axioms but it could prevent a full blown war into civilian areas you know. That is the benefit, that is the benefit. (It also could reduce terror levels in society because now the 'terrorists' could exercise for the impending 'war'.)

Title: Battlefield requests understood China? Fine, fine! 
    
UnderTitle: The file said the above picture represents bayonet practice, but
look at the bodies. Is that true? Was it Japanese bayonet practice? 

After the US intelligence matters, the Chinese intelligence matters 'via Chinese restaurants' and the battlefield requests at the Chinese it is about time for the Media report. Here we go:

Media report to 17 August: Today it surfaced that the Najaf resistance against did give up for the time being. Anyway it looks like it, in the Media files it was represented that the new Iraqi defense minister did make some final ultimatum and may be that is the truth.
Facts are that the Sunnis are the better soldiers, it was not for nothing that a long time ago I did write frequently that the uprising has to pass the borders of cultural and religious differences. We can conclude that this has not happened, a pity. 
A pity for sure, so many more US soldiers could have been killed... A pity.

From Fallujah and similar cities attacks from the US army are often reported too. Rather often killing into a small dozen and often children included. And constantly that air power used by the US army, just constantly. It makes me puke, they are cowards on the battlefield. 

Now a quote on the 'democratic developments' inside the Green zone in Baghdad (from the Lebanon Daily Star):

Iraq's National Conference chose members of an interim National Assembly Wednesday night, but a planned vote on the decision was called off at 

the last minute and conference organizers simply affirmed a list of candidates. 
Disputes over how to choose the 81 members of the assembly, which is to act as a watchdog over the interim government until January elections, had forced conference organizers to extend the meeting into Wednesday for an unscheduled fourth day.
By Wednesday evening, the delegates had gathered to choose between two candidate lists when one was suddenly withdrawn. Without ever holding a vote on the only remaining list, the conference organizers declared it the winner.
The final 19 seats of the 100-member body will be filled by members of the former US-appointed Governing Council who were not included in the interim government.

Comment: Fine democracy in action, wonderful. Why all that chaos in it? Are the Americans constantly intervening? Hard to judge that, the US-led media corps is often unwilling to let down their military so those facts often stay unreported.

After my humble opinion the Iraqi National Conference would have much more success in case it would voice strong anti American opinions. That would ensure popular backing.  

_____1_____

_____2_____

Title: Anti Americanism as the democratic glue for Iraq? Not a bad idea my dear INC.
        

End to the writings to this day, live well.  

19 August 2004: To make it clear to my readers and to the Chinese government and the Chinese army that I hold them in relatively high regards, I decided to post that wonderful story of that long gone Chinese general named Sun Tzu. His writings are known as 'The Art of War' and that is still a wonderful collection of military knowledge. 

Sun Tzu lived and worked in a time that there were many armies around that all were somehow equally strong, a completely different landscape compared to the 'modern times'. Also at the Chinese I would like to ask to develop good precision bombs (the 'smart bombs') and also those rockets that are capable of striking in concert. Imagine 26 rockets striking in concert, even the Air Force One plane of the Americans is defenseless in the face of such weaponry. 

Now to the hefty introduction of that old book with lots of military wisdom in it, here we go:

Ssu-ma Ch`ien gives the following biography of Sun Tzu: Sun Tzu Wu was a native of the Ch`i State. His ART OF WAR brought him to the notice of Ho Lu, King of Wu. Ho Lu said to him: "I have carefully perused your 13 chapters.

May I submit your theory of managing soldiers to a slight test?" Sun Tzu replied: "You may."

Ho Lu asked: "May the test be applied to women?" The answer was again in the affirmative, so arrangements were made to bring 180 ladies out of the Palace. Sun Tzu divided them into two companies, and placed one of the King's favorite concubines at the head of each. He then bade them all take spears in their hands, and addressed them thus: "I presume you know the difference between front and back, right hand and left hand?"
The girls replied: Yes.
Sun Tzu went on: "When I say "Eyes front," you must look straight ahead. When I say "Left turn," you must face towards your left hand. When I say "Right turn," you must face towards your right hand. When I say "About turn," you must face right round towards your back."
Again the girls assented. The words of command having been thus
explained, he set up the halberds and battle-axes in order to begin the drill.

Then, to the sound of drums, he gave the order "Right turn." But the girls only burst out laughing. Sun Tzu said: "If words of command are not clear and distinct, if orders are not thoroughly understood, then the general is to blame."
So he started drilling them again, and this time gave the order "Left turn,"
whereupon the girls once more burst into fits of laughter. Sun Tzu: "If words of command are not clear and distinct, if orders are not thoroughly understood, the general is to blame. But if his orders ARE clear, and the soldiers nevertheless disobey, then it is the fault of their officers."
So saying, he ordered the leaders of the two companies to be beheaded.
Now the king of Wu was watching the scene from the top of a raised pavilion; and when he saw that his favorite concubines were about to be executed, he was greatly alarmed and hurriedly sent down the following message: "We are now quite satisfied as to our general's ability to handle troops. If We are bereft of these two concubines, our meat and drink will
lose their savor. It is our wish that they shall not be beheaded."

Sun Tzu replied: "Having once received His Majesty's commission to be the general of his forces, there are certain commands of His Majesty which, acting in that capacity, I am unable to accept."
Accordingly, he had the two leaders beheaded, and straightway installed
the pair next in order as leaders in their place. When this had been done, the drum was sounded for the drill once more; and the girls went through all the evolutions, turning to the right or to the left, marching ahead or wheeling back, kneeling or standing, with perfect accuracy and precision, not venturing to utter a sound. Then Sun Tzu sent a messenger to the King saying: "Your soldiers, Sire, are now properly drilled and disciplined, and ready for your majesty's inspection. They can be put to any use that their sovereign may desire; bid them go through fire and water, and they will not
disobey."

But the King replied: "Let our general cease drilling and return to camp. As for us, We have no wish to come down and inspect the troops."

Thereupon Sun Tzu said: "The King is only fond of words, and cannot translate them into deeds."

Now isn't that fascinating reading? Sun Tzu made it perfectly clear to his king that the political and military powers each have their own responsibilities. Although Sun Tzu is a bit hefty with the beheading of the two favorite concubines of his king, it looks a bit like that US general that during the invasion of Afghanistan bluntly told at the White House "We see no role for the US military in this" when asked about opium crop eradication. 

Well my dear Chinese army, this US general was in the right when ordered crap like that from his political leaders. Because simple facts are that one can call this a 'War on Drugs' but that does not mean that bio-chemical warfare is allowed from a moral & military point of view. Drug addiction is a healthcare problem and healthcare problems are often not solvable with bullet. Beside this with a heroine addiction one can easily get 80 years of age (but the injecting method of heroin is indeed a bit more dangerous in the long run). In general cigarettes cause more harm than the smoking of heroin, but cigarettes are taxed and heroin user are a carefully crafted subculture of the main stream culture. Why this is I do not know, historical facts are that in the past there was a need for witch hunting while these days there is a desire to kill drugs users. This is a stupid development and we see once more that we must keep on killing Americans into the thousands and the hundreds of thousands... 

Title: Bio-Chemical warfare? The Americans would do it without thinking. Or not? 
        

Now we are on military stuff anyway, today a lot did happen again. And although I would like so much to write a bit again upon the Iraqi equation, the long lines of the story force me to poke fun at that American general named Boykin. In case you don't know it, this general Boykin is a high shot Pentagon guy performing with 'excellence' in the hunt of Osama bin Ladin & other evil operatives. October last year this guy sparked a big controversy because he spoke in uniform as a private person in front of a evangelical Christian community words like:
--This is a war against Satan &
--I am sure that God made it possible we have George Bush in the White House in these precious times.

That all and more he spoke out, let me quote a bit:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. Army general violated Pentagon rules by failing to properly clear speeches in which he described the war on terror as a Christian battle against Satan and should be punished, according to an inspector general's report obtained by Reuters on Wednesday.

The Department of Defense's watchdog agency said Lt. Gen. William Boykin, a top-ranking intelligence officer, used official data in some of the 23 religious-oriented speeches he gave after January 2002 which should have been cleared.

Boykin touched off a firestorm last October after giving speeches while in uniform in which he referred to the war on terror as a battle with Satan and said America had been targeted "because we're a Christian nation." He said later he was not anti-Islam or any other religion.

Boykin was obliged to clear the speeches, given "the sensitive nature of his remarks concerning U.S. policy and the likelihood that he would be perceived by his audiences as a DOD spokesman based on his official position and his appearance in uniform," the report said.

Boykin, an evangelical Christian, violated other rules by failing to issue a required disclaimer at the speeches that he was not representing official Pentagon policy, it said.

"We recommend that the Acting Secretary of the Army take appropriate corrective action with respect to Lt. Gen. Boykin," the report said.

At the time, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld praised Boykin's "outstanding record" and refused to reprimand the general, who played a role in a 1993 clash with Somali warlords and the ill-fated hostage rescue attempt in Iran in 1980.

Comment: It is just a detail but the Boykin affair was an important detail, we see again that this Secretary of Defense this Donald H. Rumsfeld is not smart enough to understand the subtleties of this present 'War on Terror' (that is much more a war against uprising Islamism, or not?). 
Well Rummycup, these days the military axioms are changing. Due to smart bombs it is not longer good possible to maintain large groups of soldiers on one spot. But much more hefty will be the next:

In these days with growing (electronic & internet) info gathering the military commander that is the best in estimating 'what could have happened' and that is best in estimating the missing information, that general will win the war. 
And after my humble opinion the American military depends too much upon smart bombs and not on smart brains, you have grown lazy in your heads and fat in your bellies. What is your modern warfare more than a burocracy behind concrete walls while trailer home born soldiers bite the dust?    

So Rummycup & other military folks, in case you read this, can you blame me for posting the next wonderful graphical art into these words? Isn't is a fact that Sun Tzu told the king: "The king is only fond of words"? And what about Annie? You know that girl that always made her own decisions and after that expected the rest of us to go along with it? (In this old story you can find both Annies legs vaporized, but what are words and what is power?). Enjoy: 

Title: The favorite concubines of the King are about to be beheaded. 
        

20 August 2004: Doinky doink & BAM BAM! The second gas explosion in a relatively short time is at the scene. Lately we had that big blast in neighboring Belgium (host headquarters NATO) and since two days in Texas... So are the GasAttacks at the scene or do these two blasts not differ from the 'natural background noise' in this? I am very curious, in case there are a few more it is almost undeniable that the Gas Attacks are indeed at the scene. 

Facts from the Texas scene: Gas storage company Ross Bluff storages about 16 billion cubic feet of natural gas (in the usual gas form, they also story liquid gas). Reports are that the burning part is something of 6 to 8 billion cubic feet large, the Ross Bluff company works with gas injections and withdrawals in salt cavers.  

Lets look at a few details from 3 weeks ago, I hope that in case the Belgium gas blast was in fact a GasAttack that the operatives in question have depositioned their asses to other countries... Here is a quote upon how a perfect GasAttack could be done (but there are always the local details that have to be taken into account at a real GasAttack of course, be creative!). Here a few details from the Belgium blast (details were found in the Oil & Gas journal online):

Acting provincial governor Guy Petit told Belgian media that the pipeline apparently was damaged by construction workers building a road over the pipeline some weeks earlier. After the blaze was extinguished, deep symmetrical gouges, possibly made by a backhoe, were found etched into a section of the pipe, severely reducing pipe thickness. In addition, large jagged rocks had been dumped onto the pipe at the site, without first blanketing it with protective gravel and soil. Fluxys also was said to have increased pressure in the line the same morning, after completing normal maintenance procedures at Zebrugge.

Comment: In case this is a GasAttack it makes fascinating reading, it is even more fascinating to know that local authorities will only investigate this as some accident. Just like the five Essent deaths from last year, Dutch authorities refuse to give me any insight into the details as they happened and they tell each other 'That confused men must not be answered.' Often authorities are fearful cowards and on top of that stupid to the bone & easily to be fooled. 
So right now it still remains to be seen if there are indeed GasAttacks at the scene and if so, the authorities will treat them the same way as the ElectricityFun from Summer 2003.

Title: It all started so small scale in Texas, just some burning but later... 
        

Right now I have a proposal to lay at the feet of the operatives:

Proposal:

Lets make alternating each Summer an 'ElectricityFun' Summer and a 'GasAttack' Summer, so last year was a Electrified year and this year (I hope) a Gassy year. Next year in Summer more Electrification at the scene and so on and so on.

Of course, a lot of operatives who read this are also not aware if indeed there are indeed GasAttacks at the scene this Summer. This is simply due to the cell structure that has to be there, but as a long term policy this could be fun. Just some Summer fun until the opponents stop telling their crap, their brain dead stupid crap.

By the way, water poisoning is still not allowed according to standard battlefield morals. Only when the Americans make more bio-chemical warfare into the Afghan landscape, this 'no water poisoning' policy will change. 

To make it a bit more clear to my honored reader that indeed the Western authorities are brain dead people we can take a fine look at the very words of the US Secretary of Justice. The Ashcroft figure. There were two 'Hamas funders' captured and what does brain dead Ashcroft say to the public? Seldom we see a judicial official sowing the very seeds of his humiliation in the courthouses. Have fun on brain dead Ashcroft:

US officials have arrested two men whom they accuse of funnelling money to the Palestinian militant group Hamas for the past 15 years, the Justice Department said.
"The individuals named in this indictment are alleged to have played a substantial role in financing and supporting international terrorism. They are alleged to be material supporters of a foreign terrorist organisation," US Attorney General John Ashcroft told a news conference. 

All three were charged with the racketeering conspiracy in an indictment which also seeks forfeiture of about $2.7 million from accounts that the defendants control. 
All three men were accused of using US bank accounts to launder millions of dollars to support Hamas activities.

Comment: Seldom we see such a big mistake like that in an official statement. Because in case the Hamas is indeed a terroristic organization it is indeed a classic example of a local terrorist organization
The Hamas has not much to do with international terror my dear Ashcroft. 
Even more to say: More than a full year ago I recited for a bit of 'mixture up' between the Hamas and the international folks. It didn't happen my dear Ashcroft and do you know why?
Because the Hamas sheik was against it, the Hamas sheik was against it. But what happened later Ashcroft? Wasn't the Hamas sheik blown away by the Israeli Defense Forces and how did your great leader react on that?

Now Ashcroft, your great leader shrugged his shoulders and spoke words like "The Israelis have the right to defend themselves from terror." Is the US government out of her mind or so? The main guy preventing Hamas going international was killed and they just shrugged their shoulders as if this all was no big deal...

Ashcroft let me tell you this at face value: Give me just one reason why the Americans not need to be killed into the thousands and the hundreds of thousands? Can you give me just one reason please? 

Let us close this day and say Amen while looking at the first giant Military Bloody Day that was located somewhere in April this spring, think well my dear reader:

Title: April was a good month for harvesting US soldier bodies... 
    

21 August 2004: In the extra text to this day I try to explain to the Iraqi operatives (but to those in other countries too) why Military Bloody Day period number eight could be of interest. This explanation has nothing to do with the actual political situation; It only covers some military, emotional and religious aspects of MBD number eight.
To the sharp reader; MBD 8 is in the rebound so to say. 
Since 26 July did not fold out the way the story needs it is wise to take a lot of time in between... 
22 August 2004: Ah, today I found out that indeed my fundamental enemy is employing completely new military axioms! My fundamental enemy (the US army of course) is training that new bright and shining Iraqi army, of course the new weaponry is coming from American weapon factories and will be paid with Iraqi oil...
Except for the hand held weaponry right now, enjoy the new military axioms as they are at the scene in Iraq. They are "bang bang you're dead" axioms... Quoting (from the Seattle Times):
TIKRIT, Iraq — Next to a dirt-packed soccer field on an island in the middle of the Tigris River, the men who represent the long-term U.S. exit strategy for Iraq crawl through the dirt. 

Taking shelter behind a makeshift barricade of stacked sandbags, one of the Iraqi National Guard trainees aims his AK-47 and fires at an invisible enemy. 

"Bang, bang," he shouts, mimicking the sound his rifle would make if it were loaded. After firing several imaginary rounds, he ducks his head back under the sandbags. 

"That's bull," U.S. Army Staff Sergeant Haily Darnell, one of the ING drill instructors, shouts — along with several colorful expletives — at the trainee prostrate in the dirt. "That's just bull. Go back and do it again."

Comment: Why do these brand new soldiers not get real rounds to practice with? Are the rumors true and is this kind of 'practice' done because otherwise the drill instructors only would get shot at 'by accident'?
Isn't this wonderful, this 'bang, bang' he shouts..... Quoting on:
Here at "ING Island," a 25-acre facility inside the sprawling grounds of the 1st Infantry Division's headquarters in Tikrit, the 330 ING recruits get just three weeks of training before being dispatched into Iraq's roughest areas to take on insurgents.

Comment: Oh no, no new military axioms at the scene. Just that old stuff with making sure that long lasting wars will be there between non-American parties. As for example a civil war in Iraq against this new born freedom loving interim government... Will there be a civil war in Iraq and will that serve the American interests or not? And what about the oil production? We see, the future is a misty thing but clear is that there die to little US-led soldiers in Iraq. (The daily average of this August month is only 2.50 dead US-led soldiers a day, Iraqis are not included of course in the US-led statistics on this.)

Title: Latest US-led military axioms: 'Bang, bang, you're dead!' 
        

But the same news article as found on the Seattle Times contains much more interesting facts, here we go:

The compound in Tikrit is one of six centralized facilities in Iraq set up to train the nation's fledgling National Guard, which Iraqi and U.S. officials plan will be the principal force in Iraq to put down an insurgency that has shown few signs of weakening since the U.S. transferred sovereignty to Iraqis on June 28.

Comment: Of course the Iraqi insurgency did not vaporize after 28 June, what an idiot expectation! Just like all those other US-led expectations like the fact that Saddam was captured did of course not change one detail too. The US military simply does not understand the characteristics of the battlefield and that is why they kill so many Iraqis constantly. It is only that the US military does not know what to do that makes them keep on killing. Or not? Quoting on:
A standing Iraqi Army won't be trained by then (the impending election date, RV), and when it is, it would focus on external threats to Iraq, not the internal security woes the country currently suffers. Moreover, the Iraqi police service in some of Iraq's most troubled locations is riddled with corruption. In Ramadi, for instance, U.S. officials believe the police have been almost entirely co-opted by the insurgency.

Comment: I am sad that the word 'corruption' is used in this, it is not corruption to work along with the insurgency as long as the US military forces are just not capable of saying some kind of 'sorry' for what has been done to Iraq. Please face the facts of history my dear US army; the evening before the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait the US ambassador said that the United States of America would see this as an 'internal affair'. 
Quoting on with the silly stuff:

The hopes of the 135,000 foreign troops in Iraq, 116,000 of whom are Americans, thus rests largely on whether the National Guard — currently totaling just more than 41,000 — can be built into a professional fighting force in short order.

Comment: No of course this will fail in all ways possible, and what has the NATO to do in this all? (The NATO did commit itself into training the new Iraqi army just 3 weeks ago.) Why did the NATO 'leadership' lure itself into this quagmire where the game is to make as much as possible Iraqis die for 'freedom'? The NATO decision to jump into this was just unbelievable stupid, plain dumb stupid and completely unforgiven. Like I wrote a long long time ago NATO, I would like to wipe you out because you stood next to America after 9/11 without checking the details involved.
Now you hand a piece of rope to me yourself, please let me hang you with that piece of rope... Just please. Just please...

Title: Latest US-led military axioms: 'Bang, bang, you're dead!' 
        

Lets just proceed with the brain dead crap from the Seattle Times article:

The current crop of recruits at ING Island has not yet been told, but their U.S. instructors have decided to prolong their training by one week because the unit soon will be dispatched into Samarra and Baqouba, two of the most dangerous cities in the so-called Sunni Triangle region. Their instructors have kept the news from the recruits to keep down the number of trainees who might drop out.

Comment: My dear Iraqi operatives in Samarra and Baquoba, have mercy on your misguided country fellow men. To me just one US soldier has much more value than 10 of these misguided Iraqis but you have to judge the actual battlefield circumstances yourself. On the other hand it is simply a fact of life that all (military related!) tentacles of this US-led government needs to be cut short, only when this interim government is exposing a hefty kind of anti-Americanism you can stop the killing of your misguided fellow countrymen.
More brain dead crap to quote:

For the U.S. officers on base, the ING recruits represent not just the future of Iraq, but their ticket home. 
"This is the exit strategy," said Maj. Bemis, looking out over a platoon of recruits training to defend themselves against an insurgent ambush. "The success of these guys will determine when we can actually leave."

Comment: Well Major Bemis, according to my humble opinion if it is the 'success' of this (military) incest breed, I think you can never go home. Just never, wanna bet? 

Title: Latest US-led military axioms: 'Bang, bang, you're dead!' 
        

23 August 2004: Today I was just a bit 'clicking around' on a website named globalsecurity dot com, and just by accident I came across a hyperlink named WorldWarIV... I felt curious and I clicked on it, the result was devastating. There was not that many text on it but the next quote must be mentioned into these files, that is a fact.

Before I make the quote let me remark at my dear reader that may be I am very smart in attacking America, in some sense I have some brains. But the present president George W. Bush has the guts, just read this mind buggling quote (George gets his orders from above):

"God told me to strike at al Qaeda and I struck them, and then he instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East." President George Bush 25 June 2003 Haaretz.

Comment: You must read that quote a few times my dear reader, I never read the entire article where this quote came from but this is mind buggling. George gets his battlefield orders from the AllMighty...
Oh oh oh, now I grasp a bit more of what 'might have happened' during the run up to the war in Iraq. First a few old facts again:
In the Summer of 2002 I asked Saddam three times on a row to shoot his both sons to death (that is some local folklore in Iraq). Saddam did not do that and after that I saw myself 'forced' to give the Americans permission to start war against Iraq. (Because I wanted the economical sanctions lifted and given the present 'political constellation' this could only be done with a war against Iraq, this insight is still valid after two full years...)
But, to the defense of George Bush, I can say that in some sense I too only try to do that what some higher power would like me to do. In that George and I are not that different may be, only I never get those direct orders to strike at particular objects you know.
For example, when I place the US secretary of defense the Donald H. Rumsfled figure on a so called sniper list at position number 004 I never had direct orders from the AllMighty. I just never ever knew that the AllMighty was so heavily involved in micro-management, I didn't know that George. 
Also I placed Donald Rumsfeld on that list out of my own free will (although Donald forced me to do this because he was telling crap like "I don't care what army does it" when WarOnDrugs was again activated into the Afghan landscape)

So we have a strange strange presidency in the American White House;
-- A president receiving direct orders from above. 
-- A full blown simple minded secretary of judicial affairs, the Ashcroft figure could have prevented anomalies like Guantomano Bay. 
--A dumb National Security Adviser named Condoleeza Rice, she spoke words like: "We never knew that Saddam would invest so badly in the Iraqi electricity network". (That means that Dr. Rice is not capable of understanding what economical sanctions do in the long run).
-- On the bright side we have Colin Powel, but Colin did contribute to the military axiom of using 'overwhelming force'. And when the other party applies just a little bit of that axiom the whole of America starts complaining upon only 3000 deaths. So general Powel is some kind of crap too. 
-- And last but not least we have that secretary of defense, the Rumsfeld figure, that secretary equates the whole WarOnTerror to the question "Can we kill terrorists in a faster rate than the massadras spit them out?" (That is Donalds understanding of the WarOnTerror...)

Why not again quote the mind buggling words of the 43th president of the United States of America? The one that I did classify a long long time ago as being IQ43, but that was at the very beginning of his 'presidency'. The American voted themselves for this figure, so they really need to be killed in the thousands and hundred of thousands. The conclusion is inevetible, or not my dear reader. Quoting again:

"God told me to strike at al Qaeda and I struck them, and then he instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East." President George Bush 25 June 2003 Haaretz.

Title: Religious blasphemy observed in America. Kill it!
    

In a completely other development I have to say a 'thank you' or a 'my compliments' to the Mehdi (or Mahdi) militia in Najaf Iraq. Not on the actual military situation (I wish I could do more but my means are limited during these times when the Americans have to go through a phase of 'acceptance' around failure of impossible missions). No I want to thank you for the fact you did release those journalists (American/French/British) and so. Only on the James Brandon release I did read some motivation and I am very glad upon the reasoning in this. 

Please don't forget the (messy) battlefield use of hostages: Are they US military related then execution is always allowed while all those who are simply not military related have some right of release. 

__________________________

Back to the American secretary of defense, just a few days after he tunneled into the sniper list at position nr 004 the next Media file (or quote) came to my attention. Instead of 'recognizing the fact that drugs money could fund evil al Queda forces' we have a range of all kinds of subtleties suddenly, just suddenly of course. Quoting (from the Washington Times):

Afghanistan's proliferating poppies pose an obvious threat to the government in Kabul, U.S. forces and the countries that opium and heroin are trafficked in, often en route to Western Europe. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld recently said an overall master plan is being developed to deal with Afghanistan's growing drug production. Such a plan is needed, but U.S. and NATO planners should craft it with a long-term vision. 
Mr. Rumsfeld recently noted, "The problem is a demand problem, in its essence." Demand will find its supply, he said. More narrowly, though, producing countries such as Afghanistan do have a supply problem, he added, because of all the associated problems that production brings. For Afghanistan, those problems are particularly alarming, since the heroin trade can enrich pro-Taliban and al Qaeda factions.

Comment: Now it is rather astonishing to observe that in fact the drugs problem is a 'demand problem'. And now this global 'demand problem' is 'narrowed down' to countries that could have yes or no a 'supply problem'. This supply problem is then caused by eventual 'associated problems that production brings'.

Well, this is a complete other kind of reasoning than 'I do not care what army does it'. Or not my dear reader? Or is this all just a 'Media misunderstanding' where leftist media outlets only report the 'I do not care what army does it' kind of wording while all smart White House proposals are neglected...
What do you think my dear reader, what do you think?  

Title: In theory, a US sniper is the best for solving this demand problem nr 004!
        

24 August 2004: Today there was another day of fighting in Najaf, from a cold hearted military point of view I can only say that this is 'good' (meaning 'bad' for the Americans). But in reality I am human too and I do not like all that US-led air power that is applied there, on the other hand I have decided a long time ago not to throw in my full weight in an attempt to let the US air power stop.

There are lots of reasons for that, one is for example that the US military did clearly state that they have left the 'Fallujah model' and so for me it is very interesting to observe how they perform... That argument is just as cold hearted as it is, I am sorry. 
There is also an emotional argument at hand (anyway it is emotional to me), this story is about changing military axioms and after my humble opinion the Shiites do not understand that completely. Explicit I mean there are far to little Dutch soldiers killed, only 2 dead so far in all these months... The story needed at least one dozen dead Dutch, they never materialized and now I am empty handed when trying to talk to the political leadership wing of the NATO. Without being arrogant I have to inform the Shia that I am relatively empty handed on this, I simply have given up my hopes for dozens of dead Dutch soldiers so I better use my time for other things (just like you Shia do by the way, I am not arrogant I only tell the truth.)

In another development the US military needs a bit of washing of the ears; since when was that 'enemy fatality number policy' restored? During Vietnam the US military stopped 'estimating' the number of enemy soldiers killed because it was always estimated (far) to high. Since then it was standing policy in the US military not to make estimations of numbers killed, but lately this long standing policy was changed. So why is this? Why?
Because just like in Vietnam you probably will do exactly the same with constantly overestimating the numbers killed (lots of media files already point in that direction). Please let me inform you that I consider this a sign of weakness, stop estimating and hold on to decade long standing policy please...

Now a quote from the new Iraqi defense minister around the Najaf equation, quote found on the Cable News Network (CNN):

"We are in the last hours. This evening, Iraqi forces will reach the doors of the shrine and control it and appeal to the Mehdi Army to throw down their weapons," Sha'alan told a news conference, according to Reuters. "If they do not, we will wipe them out."

Comment: Again I am cold hearted but I simply will observe how the situation will unfold. That's all.

Title: In theory, a US sniper is the best for solving this problem nr 004!
        

At the end to this days writing we can read the 'exporting violence & death' from the American president like I wrote it on the homepage to this day. A fascinating quote that makes once more abundantly clear that the Americans need to be killed in the thousands and hundreds of thousands. Quote from the homepage:

(Monday 23 August 16.43 hours) Doink, I just did not believe it when I read it and I do not have that book from Bob Woodward but who said the next words? Quote: "We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth in defense of this great nation." Now, who would be so radical and such a zealot? Now?

Again, I just did not believe it at first but it seems confirmed; It was the 43th President of the USA, Mr. George W. Bush, that spoke these very words around the continuing export of violence and death... Do you believe that? What can I say upon such words? What can I say? Well those words are very simple countered with the next:

Kindly I would like to remark at my American readers the fact that one of the new military axioms is the 'one percent of population rule' (meaning that when more than one percent of the population died one must surrender or that the international community has a fundamental right of intervenance).  
Kindly I would to remind the American readers to the fact that one percent of America amounts to 3 million people. These are the kind words America, in principle the operatives have some operating space of 3 million civilians, these are the kind words...

But I can change opinion of course and be unkind to your great nation, it will take me a few years of thinking but it is quite well possible that there will be one nation that will not fall under the 'Maximum one percent of population rule'. It is just at your consideration my dear American readers, it is just at your consideration for just a few years.  

Again my dear readers, my mind is flabbergasted, is it true that the Americans need not a '40 thousand blast' but a full 3 million before they will start acting normal? Facts are that the present President is still held in high esteem and has lots of support inside America, also they voted this 'intellectual thing' themselves. It just makes logic to lift the 3 million barrier but I will take my time and think on it a long long time. 

Title: Logic in lifting 3 million barriers? Or am I bluffing like usual?
    

26 August 2004: Today we ask ourselves the following question: Are there on the entire face of this little planet people who take great pride into killing into the millions? Even when it later turned out that all that killing was completely unnecessary and that in fact all that bio-chemical warfare like agent orange was indeed a bit overdone? Well I just found today that there are indeed some folks on the face of this planet that still are proud upon their killings in Vietnam. The next quote is from a letter from the Vietnam vets to USA presidential hopeful Mr. John Kerry:
We’re proud of our service in Vietnam. We served honorably in Vietnam and we were deeply hurt and offended by your comments when you came home. 

You can’t have it both ways. You can’t build your convention and much of your campaign around your service in Vietnam, and then try to say that only those veterans who agree with you have a right to speak up. There is no double standard for our right to free speech. We all earned it.

Comment: Wow wow wow, there are still a lot of folks that find 'honor' in bio-chemical warfare in the United States of America. These fuckheads 'served honorably' in a war based on cheap crap, likely the fuckheads still think they fought against communism for all the right reasons. But in fact, Stalin never traveled the Ho-Chi-Min route or am I wrong on that one?
But the Vietnam vets have also a good point made; there is no double standard on free speech. There just isn't, these days in Iraq even folks like al Sadr and Sistani say they want democracy and freedom but at the same time these are constantly the 'radicals' and the 'zealots'. But, there is no double standard of course...

But my dear Vietnam vets, the best 'free speech general' could recite for bio-chemical warfare in the heartlands. The free speech general could also not recite for stuff like that. It is not dependent on your past behavior in Vietnam but on your future behavior. Think a bit upon that my dear Vietnam vets, there are hundreds of fronts in this WarOnTerror but lately that 'many decade front' of designer diseases was activated by me. Want some? In that case please proceed with taking pride in the killing of millions, just take pride... 

Title: Just like the Vietnam vets the Germans should be proud too?
    

Enough of those long time schemes & enough of those grand visions upon how to put the future together. The present can be great fun too you know. It is not killing into the millions it is just one US soldier... From a fun point of view I can say 'How is the winning of hearts & minds going' and from other points of view I have to say 'Do not cross the borders of standard moral behavior too far my dear Iraqis'. 
So what kind of emotion is winning it in my head my dear reader, is it the fun of throwing a leg at the dogs or is it the political correct version of saying 'Thee are naughty naughty!'? Enjoy this:

Asked how the battle was going, Commander Abu Mohammad Hilu showed off his latest trophy - a blood-drenched American boot. There was a large bullet hole in the middle. 'We found it after last night's battle,' the commander explained. His colleague, Abu Ali, added: 'Originally there was an American foot inside it and a bit of the leg. But we took it out and threw it to the dogs.'

Comment: Similar reports have been observed during the Fallujah siege from last April, only then it were dogs eating Muslims meat. The dead bodies could not be rescued because of American sniper fire.
So I am not doing difficult on just one leg to the dogs, as long it is not turned into a policy I have fun too. 

__________________________

In a completely other update I can finally 'test' my individual estimation of the number of people that died while under USA detention in this so called WarOnTerror. The sharp reader might know that in the past this was estimated by me as lying in the 200 to 400 range of dead people in USA-led custody. 
The latest US military led number under US military investigation I am aware of is still that 'at most 39' figure, after my humble opinion the number of killed while in US custody is still much higher. Here is a simple quote from a relatively unreliable source (the Washington Post dot com):

In light of what happened at Abu Ghraib, a series of comprehensive investigations has been conducted by various components of the Department of Defense. Since the beginning of hostilities in Afghanistan and Iraq, U.S. military and security operations have apprehended about 50,000 individuals. From this number, about 300 allegations of abuse in Afghanistan, Iraq or Guantanamo have arisen. As of mid-August 2004, 155 investigations into the allegations have been completed, resulting in 66 substantiated cases.

Comment: Again why should I do difficult on subjects like this? There are 66 'substantiated cases' left in the US-led military courtrooms while I as some lousy individual think the '400 number' is far more realistic. That is what I think, if you as a reader are operating from the opinion that 'route 66' is the route to ride I cannot have any problem with this. 

But other democracies must not forget that the Americans are the only in the entire democratic hemisphere that have 'private prisons' and we all know that the percentage of the entire American population behind bars is a manyfold of the percentages in decent democracies. The other democracies must work together and kill the American democracy, in the end that will be the best for this planet. Or not?  

Title: Anti Americanism as the democratic glue for Iraq? Not a bad idea, not bad.
        

27 August 2004: So is there fun flown into the buildings of devastating art? The TwoPlanesSimultaneously in the Russian landscape was five days before the impending elections into the Chechen landscape. Here is a small part of the conversation I have with Arty around this subject, in case you don't know who Arty is you can read this story. I created Arty nine weeks before 9/11/2001 and it was Arty that told us of that wonderful music like you never heard before, it was just a bit later that I vaporized both Annie her legs but who is Annie?
Well Annie is that girl that always makes her own decisions and after that expect the rest to go along with that (of course Annie is a symbolism to America that behaves just like that...)

Now a quote from the little conversation & a quote from the intro words from the homepage:

-Reinko: Bring in the FUN! Lets fly fun in the buildings of art.

-Arty (looks bewildered): What do you mean man? Must we kiss the 
Americans with true love & fun? Are you crazy?

-Reinko (You see the fires from hell shining from his eyes): No Arty, we must
push world opinion in the fact that it is FUN to kill Americans.
All writers & moviemakers must make clear to the public
how much FUN that can be...

-Arty (looks amused): Yes, lets make a comedy 'Anthrax & America'.
Or a movie 'Private Sex Prisons in Afghanistan'. 
(Arty smiles softly) 

-Reinko: Lets get to work! 

__________________________

So far the intro writings, just a few days later we had that TwoPlanesSimultaeously & quoting on:

__________________________

-Arty (looks bewildered): What do you mean "It looks like an 
Olympic number in an Opera five setting
"???

-Reinko (smiling): Well it was a TwoPlanesSimultaneous and it was five days
before the impending elections. So it was an Opera five act.. 

-Arty (laughing): Ah just like those simultaneous divings from a springboard at the Olympics in Athena... But who has the gold medal this time?

-Reinko (pretending to be serious): The gold medal goes to the organizers 
of course, but who are they? It can't be the Chechens because 
they are far too polite for that... 

-Arty (thundering from laughter): Yes yes, the first Chechen war was only
 50 thousand civilians dead but they are 'too polite' now... Reinko
you are crazy, but serious how will Putin react do you think?

-Reinko (suddenly Reinko is serious): The most reasonable scenario is that he will send two large cargo planes with Wodka so the fine Russian army can 
do a bit more of that drunk killing. In the meantime Putin will 
mumble his standard verse "The Russian state will not bow, 
will never bow!
" Something like that will happen 
I think.

-Arty (also serious): Could be, could be. Lets pray for the 
Chechens Reinko, lets pray.

And so they did, but does it help? Does it help to pray? Or are soft spoken words like "The future of designer diseases could do miracles for Russian army battlefield discipline" far more efficient? Who knows? Who knows...

Yes, the designer diseases how realistic are they? Ok ok it is just a new front and a front where it will take a long long time to expect results from. To be precise, I think it will take two decades plus or minus a few years before I will have a lethal but sharp 'designer disease weapon' at hand. 

In case my dear reader still does not understand the dimensions of this nice story you must definitely read the opening phase of the CyberWar, that was done on 19 July 2002 so CyberWar is now two years on track...
Well how is the software powerhouse Microsoft doing lately? They had to withdraw all kinds of good programmers from their long term project named LongHorn to make that update for the latest Windows Operating System, so that looks like a good development. 

Title: Just 89 dead in the TwoPlanesSimultaneously, peanuts compared to 50.000!
      

Yes, peanuts is the 89 dead compared to the total of only the Chechen-Russian war part one. From the second part both parties give no good numbers but likely it could be of similar size. This while in the former Chechen landscape relatively few people lived, the Russian army is some shit army we can safely conclude. Or not my dear readers? Are the Chechens only to blame because they did not want to belong at that mighty fine Russian empire? 

Now we take a fine look at the words of the NATO chairman, the Dutch guy Jaap the Hoop Scheffer (in English you pronounce his name as the Oops Keffer). The NATO chairman is one of those who just is not capable of counting dead bodies, instead of declaring that it is only logical to get a bit of ramming back after killing so many thousands we have this crap (quote):

NATO's chief blamed terrorism for both crashes.

"I condemn in the strongest possible terms the apparent act of barbaric terrorism ... resulting in the crash of two Russian passenger aircraft, and the senseless loss of innocent lives," NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, said Friday.

Comment: No no my dear fellow Dutch 'citizen' you are wrong, when operatives stage operations exactly five days before some important event it is never without sense. You know Jaap when operatives do that, it is also some kind of (implicit) statement that my version of the nine eleven attacks is more accurate than the official white house version is. But at the same time I know Jaap that you are to stupid to understand that on the one hand and on the other hand you are just as unwilling to investigate that because you white house friends do not like that.
Cut the crap Jaap, please read who is at number 004 of the sniper list... Cut the crap Jaap!

Title: Like an Olympic Act, two planes went down simultaneously...
      

In a way to distract, to deceive and to conceal to the so called 'terror experts' upon 'what could have happened' on the Russian TwoPlanesSimultaneously dance I have to emphasize the very fact that it is very likely that the AllMighty that created this universe is in fact against simple minded rulers like the Russian president Putin & the American counterpart the Bush figure... Therefore I would like to remind my dear audience at the way the great Ronald Reagan died, that previous famous American president...

Well Ronald Reagan died slowly from Alzheimer, very slowly and it took a full decade... Historical verifiable facts are that the great Ronald spoke words upon the HIV virus & the AIDS disease like the next:

Those who live in sin die in sin.

These are highly disturbing words, but an American president can easily come away with it. Or not? Well right now after this shithead is dead for a few months we can jump to the conclusion that all those who lead the US presidency in stupidity die from stupidity, they die from Alzheimer... 
So if in fact the AllMighty is really micro managing this world, then the AllMighty did a fine fine and superb job with the slow killing of the stupid former US president named Ronald Reagan. Or not my dear reader, were you not glad that he died so slowly, so devastating slowly? Now, what do you think my dear reader?   

Title: Presidents that lead with stupidity die from Alzheimer, thank you AllMighty!
        

29 August 2004: Ok since I did not mention the Afghan evolutions a long time but I mentioned their sole existence in the extra text to this day lets take a fine look at the Afghan landscape. There was FUN and there was SADNESS observed:

Today there was fun observed in the case of a crater for the door of the Dyncorp Inc (that provides security for the present 'President of Afghanistan', also known as the mayor of Kabul.) Fine blast by the way, soft target lookalike but certainly allowed from this stories point of view. (Well is Dyncorp Inc truly a soft target? Who is believing that?) According to the ways of this story, Dyncorp Incorporated folks are American mercenaries hiding amongst the Afghan public; that is what they are!

Therefore a nice pic of the blast & aftermath might enter this long story: 

Title: The private mercenaries were definitely an allowed target. Simple...
        

But there is also some 'sadness target' observed this day, lets read the next (a blast from yesterday in the Paktia province of the Afghan landscape):

An Afghan official said the blast on Saturday evening in Paktia province was caused by a bomb, though the military said it was still unclear.

"There was an explosion, that's all we know," American spokeswoman Master Sgt. Ann Bennett said. "Killed were four children, five teenagers and one adult."

he Mullah Khel school near Zormat, about 130 kilometers (80 miles) south of the capital, Kabul, was an Islamic school which also taught the more modern syllabus set by the Afghan Education Ministry.

It received funding from an international aid group, Wafa said, something that could conceivably have made it a target for Taleban-led militants.

Comment: For me it is hard to judge from this distance who did this actual bombing. Facts are that never ever schools were allowed objects to bomb (military schools are excluded from this of course). I know very well that I have written it myself (quote:) 'Tentacles of newly implemented puppet regimes must be kept short'. 
But that does not mean that schools for kids are reasonable targets, look for another solution to non-military problems please... (I am well aware of the fact that at least some Taliban folks will get to know these words, just spread them; No kid stuff allowed!)

So far the developments in the Afghan landscape, I wish them luck.

__________________________

Now for the hexagon, have you ever heard of hexagon? I didn't but later it was told it was RDX. Ah, RDX! That is something completely different than hexagon or pentagon stuff... Under the operatives there even are folks who can brew that hexagon stuff themselves, anyway that is what time magazine told me. 
Also there were some Dutch magazines that wrote that in fact the TwoPlanesSimultaneously from Russia (five days ago) were in the very same minute! So not a 2-to-3 minute spread, it was in the same minute! (Anyway that is what they reported...) Here is a picture of an 'encyclopedia' that is used by 'evil people', this 'encyclopedia' was found in the Afghan landscape a long time ago: 

Title: Time Mag exposes the deepest secrets of al Qaida; RDX gives meat soup...
        

30 August 2004: Weakness! You must not expose your weakness because the enemy will make use of that!

My dear reader, who spoke these words? Are these words from somebody on the offensive or on the defensive? Let me give you a quote from that guy:

"You cannot show weakness in this world today because the enemy will exploit that weakness," he said. "It will embolden them and make the world a more dangerous place."

Yes, you likely have guessed it right. It was that same guy that spoke words like "We will continue to export death and violence to the four corners of the earth in defense of this great nation." These words can only come from the 43th president of the United States of America. The problem with these 'cannot show weakness' words is simple; smart generals expose weaknesses in the enemy with or without the enemy exposing them.

The enemy knows just from observation and filtering out the macho crap where the vulnerabilities are, the weakness in question does not need approval from the American Media files my dear 43th president of the USA. 

Ha, with some sarcastic fun we remember how this 43th president estimated the number of years of this so called WarOnTerror, it was 4 to 6 years he said. Right when smarty IQ43 spoke these words I knew it could run into the 4 to 6 decades, also I knew he would sow these long decade lasting seeds themselves. 

And what does 'cannot show weakness' mean in detail? For example that detail of those one million+ people that died from the economical sanctions in Iraq. Were those deaths only triggered by the zealot behavings of the United Nations or were it in fact the Americans that came up with crap like 'evil dual use' so the Iraqis could not even buy water pumps? Was America forced to follow the orders of the UN in this? 

Beside this, the fundamental weakness of America lies within it's own democratic model that looks a lot like "You can choose your leader for the next four years and you can choose from a set of two people." Because in decent democracies the president or the prime minister is considered the 'first among equal'. That means this pm is the spokesperson upon the most important subjects, how does America fare on this? Now? 
My advice is of course to kill these gun toting into the thousands and the hundreds of thousands, this advice is not given from some stupid set of emotions I might have. It is better for the rest of this world, but it is difficult to kill. I know. 

Title: Do I really want to kill Americans into the hundreds of thousands? 
              

31 August 2004: Today it was a busy day in 'terror land' or whatever that 'land' might be; There were twelve hostages executed at the same time in Iraq, in the Israeli-Palestine equation there was a simultaneous twin bus bombing with over 15 reported dead. And last but not least a female suicide car bomber in MosCow Russia with until now at least 10 reported dead.
 

Lets go short along those three things:

One: The execution of 12 hostages in Iraq (location unknown). Quote:

A video purporting to show the execution-style murder of 12 Nepalese workers kidnapped in Iraq was posted today on a website linked to an Islamist militant group. A statement on the website signed "Ansar al-Sunna Army" vowed to keep fighting the Americans in Iraq.

Comment: I really do hope that the Ansar al-Sunna platoons get the message upon the 'use of hostages' in the Iraqi equation. It is rather simple, all who work for the US military have bad luck and all those who are clearly not military related have good luck. But the line is sharp and not in the favor of the US military. Look at the old words written over five weeks ago:

-All US army personnel wearing the uniform,
-All US army personnel captured in civil clothing (but the ID papers say its a US soldier or so),
-All people who are on the pay roll of military equipment companies (like that Saudi example of the guy that repaired Apache helicopters),
-All US 'civilians' that do jobs that normally would have been done by the US army in Iraq, when they carry a gun they are very simply 'military related' (think for example at those four Blackwater employees, all four were former US military),
-Red Cross employees 'inspecting' the 'Geneva convention rules upon making war' are definitely US military related while the Red Cross employees taking care of the medical and human aid parts of the Red Cross are often only there to help. 

So in case the hostages you have so not meet the above examples just use your own mind and simple morality: In case you were a hostage, what would you consider 'normal'? Now? 

Title: Two buses FifteenSecondsApart? Work harder Sharon, just harder...
        

Two: The twin bus blast in Beersheba Israel, quote:

A pair of Palestinian suicide bombers detonated explosives on two municipal buses in the city of Beersheba Monday, killing at least 16 and wounding dozens in the worst terrorist attack in an Israeli city in almost six months. 

The twin explosions - the first ever to rock the largest city in southern Israel - left about 90 injured and shattered one of the longest periods of calm inside Israel since the start of the four-year cycle of violence.
The two buses blew up 15 seconds apart, about 100 yards from a busy intersection in the centre of Beersheba.

Comment: Not so bad, in fact very good. This proves once more that as long as there is occupation that Israel will not have security (while their wall that defines their thinking is meeting some international diplomacy troubles). The Israelis still don't get the message and the message is back to those four decade old lines... For the rest I can say that the '15 seconds barrier' is a good record, may be some day I can make a contest out of that... ;) 

Title: Two buses FifteenSecondsApart? Very sharp my dear Palestines, very sharp. 
        

Three: The female suicide bomber in Moscow Russia , quote:

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Ten people were killed and at least 20 injured by a female suicide bomber in a central Moscow car park on Tuesday evening, Russian news agencies reported.
"It was like a big thunder clap. I was just coming out of the shop. There was one explosion, then another small one, probably from gas," Alexei Borodin, 29, told Reuters. 

"I saw five people who could not stand up. And there were other people who were in small bits. There was one man without a stomach shouting: 'Where are the police?"'

Comment: Of course the operatives know this for a long time; when males and females can fight together on the most difficult battlefield there is I just like it. A good contraweight against all that Western media crap of how devastatingly bad Muslim females are treated... So my compliments on this act of revenge, lets not forget that the Chechen war number one was only something like 50 thousand dead Chechens... Lets not forget that, what is 10 dead Russians compared to that? What is the biggest terror? 

Title: Female car lifting in Moscow, what will leader Putin say? Learn to count Putin, learn to count it is good for the soul... 
        

End of this long part 36, go to the next part please.

NATO NATO, what did you forget? Now I'll kiss you with love & that's a fact!
       

 

 

 

 

Support this website Support this website Support this website Support this website  

End of part XXXVI. Back to part XXXV or go to part Part XXXVII  

 

 

 

 

Top of this page        Homepage        Disclaimer to these pages