(29 Sept 2023) Bah, I had planned to do a lot today but I got at most half done. Well it's one of those days and at least what was finished was done good. It's already late so lets go to two small items for today's update:

Item 1) UATV on Russia cannibalizing on old military gear.
Item 2) Are electrons always indistinguishable? Of course not... 

 Item 1) UATV on Russia cannibalizing on old military gear.

It was relatively quiet today when it came to war news. That doesn't say it was quiet in Ukraine but there was not that much news. I saw an interesting short video from UATV on Russia cannibalizing old military gear from the Sovjet era.  

Stuff like Russians are removing barrels so they can replace the worn out stuff they use inside Ukraine. Click on the picture for the video: 

Video title: Russia is Scraping Old Equipment to Deter Ukrainian Counteroffensive.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbVXNK1oRJ8 

It is hard to estimate how fast and in what rate the Russian military is eating itself up. But it is clearly happening so that will have some long term consequences for them. 

 Item 2) Are electrons always indistinguishable? Of course not... 

And the usual rant against electrons being viewed as tiny magnets. No no in my view they are magnetic monopoles and their magnetic charge is permanent so they cannot flip their spin.

The strongest argument against the tiny magnet model for electron magnetism is the weird case of the Pauli exclusion principle that says in electron pairs the electrons must have opposite spins.  

But having 'opposite spins' means the tiny magets are anti-aligned so the question is how they can form a bonding pair in molecular binding? Because the electrons are anti-aligned they must do the bonding via north pole to north pole bridges or south pole to south pole bridges or bindings.

This means you must throw overboard the principle that in magnetism opposites attract. Of course the people that explain the Pauli exclusion principle never tell you that, it is as if all logical thinking suddenly stops and all you hear is that mumbo jumbo about quantum numbers.

Because I think the magnetic charge is permanent, that means there are two kinds of electrons and they differ only in their magnetic charge. One of things I couldn't do today was look again for a source that says there are also (elastic) collisions between electrons and their anti particle the positron.  

If there are two kinds of electrons there are also two kinds of positrons and if an electron and a positron with the same magnetic charge meet, they cannot annihilate. That would make these collisions a bit more understandable: why don't they annihilate but collide? 

I found a relatively simple video from a guy named Parth G and he follows more or less the official version of stuff. And that says the Pauli exclusion principle is partly based on the anti-symmetric properties of the wave function. For me that is not very convincing, although I like math a lot in my view electron pairs are not pairs because of 'quantum numbers' but because they have opposite magnetic charges. 

As usual click on the picture for the video: 

Video title: The Basic Math that Explains Why Atoms are Arranged Like They Are: Pauli Exclusion Principle.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INYZy6_HaQE 

The problem I have with an explanation like this that says electrons are in all kinds of super positions otherwise the wave function would not be anti symmetric is very simple: 

1) Electrons have permanent magnetic charge and therefore;
2) They will never be in a super position of spin up and spin down. 

So the key question is also easy to understand: 

Parth mentioned that weird looking expression like in
 
| 1 > | 2 > - | 2 > | 1 >. 
 
It's just a super position of two possible quantum states for a pair of electrons but that means the individual electrons do not have a permanent magnetic charge. 

Lets leave it with that, thank you my dear reader to make it alive to the end of this post with weird looking quantum super positions while in the real world the physics professors have zero proof that indeed electrons are tiny magnets.  

(27 Sept 2023) Not much lack of dull and boring news like an EU media team has further tied evidence of UA involvement in the Nord Stream 2 pipelines. It's no secret that I thought the USA has done that but I do not have any proof whatsoever and therefore I have to keep an open mind about that detail.

Lets go to the two items for today: 

Item 1) Black Sea naval blast partially caused by salary problems?
Item 2) New post on other website + Karl Popper on falsification.

 Item 1) Black Sea naval blast partially caused by salary problems?

The 190 mile range ATACMS go to Ukraine, the White House has given the green light for that. If I understand it correctly only the cluster ammo version of it, likely there are many warheads for such a system. After all it is made by Americans so it's good (but expensive).   

Last Firday the Russian naval HQ came under attack, that was some serious development. If true that about 33 Russian officers are killed, given the tremendous hierarchical structure of the Russian military forces this must be a good blow for them.

If you would ask me all in all the counter offensive of UA is going relatively good. I never said it but when it all started a few months ago I directly more or less expected the autumn to be the time frame where it all comes a bit together. Of course it is autumn for just a few days, six days to be precise, but if this sets the tone for the rest of the season that's good.  

A few hours ago came the next crazy news, let me quote it:

After missing their anticipated salary payments, Russian officers leaked sensitive information about Moscow's Black Sea Fleet to a Ukrainian partisan movement, Ukrainian media reported, revealing the intelligence later paved the way for a devastating missile strike on the fleet's headquarters in the occupied Crimean Peninsula. 

Source: Ukrainian resistance fighters say Russian officers who hadn't been paid by Moscow sold them key intel on the Black Sea Fleet. Missiles then tore through the headquarters. Link used:
https://news.yahoo.com/russian-officers-hadnt-paid-moscow-200016928.html 

That's how the Ukrainians came to know there would be a meeting at the head quarters, I mean that is just WOW! 

Of course the land war goes a bit slower but it just keeps on grinding on and on and on and not in a direction desirable by the Kremlin. At last it was reported that the average Russian conscript has on average four and a half month to live when send to battle.   

 Item 2) New post on other website + Karl Popper on falsification.

I wrote a very simple post on the other website that has a title that might sound complicated but if you have seen that stuff before it is not that complicated: It is about total angular momentum in the z-direction. 

With that weird sounding language the physics people mean how much spin unpaired electrons in atoms or molecules have in a vertical direction. The point is that I view electrons as magnetic monopoles and if I calculate the net magnetic charge all I have to do is add things up just like you add up electric charges in say an ion. Ions have a total electric charge because they have too much or to little electrons. With magnetic charges it all depends on the unpaired electrons that form the total of magnetic properties.

What I do and what the physics people do is precisely the same but of course my version is much simpler because I do not have to worry about all those spin vectors that do not exist but only in the mind of physics people.

Often I complain stuff like "Why don't they fucking see that this tiny magnet model for electrons leads to all kinds of contradictions and nonsense?" Because now I reject that tiny magnet model it is rather easy to see a lot of the nonsense that came along with that model for electron magnetism.

Slowly I begin to understand a bit why the physics people can be wrong about electron magnetism and not see that for a full century. I you accept a paradigm like electrons act like tiny magnets that becomes a way of thinking and everything wrong with that is often hidden in the blind spots of that paradigm.  

Now the paradigm stuff is from Thomas Kuhn but today I want to talk about Karl Popper because he is the guy from that falsification stuff. Karl remarked that good science should be falsifiable and that means if it is wrong you should be able to prove that it is wrong.

That sounds very good, if it is wrong it is of course handy you find that out before wasting years and years of time in say nuclear fusion or building quantum computers.  

Yet now I know a bit more about Karl Popper I have revised my view on him: he is as good a nutjob as a lot of physics or math professors. He had some weird stuff about a so called demarcation line between science and pseudo science. Is there a way to differentiate between science and pseudo science?

For me these kind of questions are like how many angels can dance on the tip of a needle. That is nice to think or talk about when you are gulping down a few pints but that is not serious stuff.

Of course there is no mechanism or method to separate science from pseudo science. You must look at it on a case to case basis, how can you find something that works in all branches of science? That is too naive I just guess.

Another detail I do not like from Karl Popper is that he claims that the best scientists are always trying to disprove their own beliefs. That is total bullshit. Take for example physics professors, since 100% of them believe electrons are tiny magnets why should a career loving physics professor try to disprove that? If he or she does such a thing like undertaking an experiment that could disprove that electrons are tiny magnets, the fellow physics professors will think this person is crazy to the bone.

That's the way it works in practice. Just like math professors cannot find three dimensional complex numbers, if one of them tries it they will find themselves marginalized and neglected by the mainstream of the community.

In my view Karl Popper was a dumb ass because he was working in the beta side of science his whole life (he was a logician) and never remarked it would be great if there would be experimental proof that electrons were tiny magnets.

Never ever in one century of time there were experiments like that.   

A video from the Leiden university about the Karl Popper stuff can be seen if you click on the next picture of Karl Popper: 

Video title: Chapter 1.4: Karl Popper and the logic of falsification
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlFywEtLZ9w 

That was it, thanks for your attention. 

(22 Sept 2023) It were two busy days in Crimea and an airfield or airbase named Saky has come under attack. It looks like it helped a lot that those S-400 air defense systems from Russia are destroyed. And today it emerged the first grain ship arrived in Turkey, it was only a 3000 ton ship if memory serves but anyway that is a whole lot of trucks. The bulky seaships likely cannot take that new route. Anyway a lot happened but I have only two items for you so lets go:  

Item 1) A grain rift between Poland and Ukraine?
Item 2) One century of doing nothing versus 2000 years of doing nothing.

 Item 1) A grain rift between Poland and Ukraine?

One thing is very clear: From the beginning of this war Poland was very helpful and did a huge effort to help Ukraine and all those refugees. Now Poland has recently refused Ukrainian grains to enter the country because last year they had such a bad experience with that.
Likely it is a bit overblown but there are elections impending in Poland and if the imports are an election issue over there, that should be something Ukraine should take into account and not go to the World Trade Organization or so. I don't think that is very helpful and only troubles the relations for no reason at all while those judicial actions can take years before it ends.

I do not know in how far the action of Poland itself is illegal inside the EU framework where it was allowed that Ukraine could resume grain exports despite the fact that a lot of the grains are grown without following EU rules on the use of pesticides and so. 

So it is a gift and not a fundamental right or so.  

On the other hand I might be handy if Poland has a bit more trust in the EU institutions. They are not there to rape pillage and plunder Poland but often try to help a bit. For example this is from a few days ago: 

Following the expiry of the restrictive measures on Ukrainian exports of grain and other foodstuff to the EU, Ukraine agrees to introduce measures to avoid a renewed surge in EU imports
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_23_4497  

On the other hand the stuff from the Polish pm could be a bit misrepresented. An observer noted that by now Poland has transferred almost all Sovjet era weaponry to Ukraine and therefore it is now time to build and rebuild the Polish military forces. Is it true Poland placed an order for 450 HIMARS systems? Wow that is a lot and don't forget that is good for the future safety of the EU or better the NATO members around here. 

So it would be great if we can just stop this tit for tat stuff that serves nothing at all. Lets hope this will blow over as soon as possible. 

That is what I had to say on this detail. 

  Item 2) One century of doing nothing versus 2000 years of doing nothing.

According to a theory on scientific revolutions or changes from Thomas Kuhn scientists in a particular field often follow some paradigm and when they find more and more anomalies they can't explain, that will lead to a change in the overall paradigm. And that can take a long time.

As an example you might have heard that some Greek philosopher named Aristotle thought that heavy objects fall faster compared to objects with less mass. And it was until Galileo who experimented with that found out that this was not true at all. And that was about 2000 years later.

So the question is why it took so long and why did so many people just not see that the ideas of Aristotle were false? Well the explanation given is that people who think heavier objects fall faster explain real world things by just using that. It has become a way of thinking and as such anomalies are often just neglected.

Over the last eight years or so I have made a long list of all things wrong with the official version of electron spin and I just never understood why you have so many physics professors but none of them see that there are problems with viewing electrons as tiny magnets.

The best example of such an anomaly is the Pauli exclusion principle in electron pairs in chemical bindings between atoms. The Pauli principle says that the electron spins must be anti-aligned and that simply means they must bind via north-pole to north-pole bridges or the south-pole to south pole variant of that. So you must abandon the principle that in magnetism opposite poles attract. But these werido's, these physics professors just never remark that simple to find anomaly. It looks like all brain activity just stops before that...  

Another example is the idea that electrons anti-align themselves with an applied magnetic field. So if you approach a bunch of electrons it is believed that half of them will turn their north pole side to that applied magnetic field. But that COSTS ENERGY because it raises the potential energy.

Well it could be true that if you believe in the tiny magnet model for electron magnetism, you just don't see the anomalies. And that that explains why the weirdo's, the physics professors, never see the solution is so simple: All of the problems are only caused by the belief that electrons are tiny magnets, the problems are gone if you view the electron as a magnetic monopole. 

But there is another blockade in the head of the physics professors: For some strange reason they think that magnetic monopoles don't exist. So it goes from crazy (just thinking that electrons are tiny magnets) to the madhouse (magnetic monopoles do not exist). 

You have the same kind of weird behavior inside mathematics. Despite the fact it was in the year 1990 that I found the 3D complex numbers, likely at present date a majority of math professors still think 3D complex numbers do not exist because they have a few stupid theorems that say so.

Nobody remarks these theorems are stupid because they say you cannot find an impossible thing because it is not possible. They want 3D complex numbers only as an extension of their 2D complex numbers, that is clearly not possible and guess what? Once more: all thinking stops for at least a century.

As you see my view on scientists is not very positive: These are not critical thinkers. May be they check their articles deep and thoroughly before publication but all that stuff like electrons are tiny magnets or 3D numbers do not exist, they swallow it all without thinking...

That was it for this update, thanks for your attention.  

(20 Sept 2023) Today I didn't have much time to follow the news because I was able to finish the great cleaning up of my computer. And you know it is time for a great clean up if even your clone software is somehow corrupted or does not work...

Luckily the clones software could be installed anew so I did not have to go back to a new install of the Windows OS and after that install all that software you need... That is often a full day of work so I could avoid that.   

Anyway I was able to install a clone from 2010 and after that replace an old hard disk for a new fresh SSD disk. I love them because they do not wear and tear (but it is unknown how long they last as far as I know).

So I am ready to get or make a new computer because I always like to have a spare computer. That is not only a spare computer but also a computer that hardly visits the space known as the internet. I have already seen a nice buy, it is 42 cm high so it should just fit in. But if I would do that I would pay for Windows 11 because that comes pre installed and the last time I paid for the Windows OS was Windows 3.11. Ok ok after two decades may be buy a new OS? Well we'll see...;) Two items for today: 

Item 1) Just random UA stuff.
Item 2) Karl Popper versus Kuhn on how science evolves.

  Item 1) Just random UA stuff.

Since I did not follow the news at all today, only an interesting picture of a second hole in that kilo class submarine that came under attack in Sevastopol: 

Suchominus has a bit more on this on Youtube:

Photo Shows SECOND Hole At Side of Kilo-Class Submarine Hit By Storm Shadow! Link used:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ChU0w_5VgM

And very different, remember that old show named Spitting Image? Well it seemed that Russia had some version of that too but that was a long time ago: 

Those were the days I just guess... Lets go to the next item: 

  Item 2) Karl Popper versus Kuhn on how science evolves.

I had heard of the Karl Popper guy because he is the one that clearly stated that good science should be falsifiable. That means if it is wrong it should be possible to show via experiment that it is wrong. But I never heard of the Kuhn guy but he had a theory about paradigms and the change in those fundamental and wide things. 

Now my ideas about electrons as being magnetic monopoles is very falsifiable: Take a homogenous (that is constant in space) magnetic field that is also constant in time. If electrons placed inside that magnetic field do not get accelerated, in that case the electrons are likely tiny magnets. And if such a thing would ever occur I would have to pushback my little theory of electron spin as a magnetic charge and of course also commit suicide. Now may be that goes a bit too far, after all it is only electron behavior but I would not feel positive about such a finding.

The question of how science evolves is a very wide question. How does sociology or psychology evolve versus physics? And in math, does there evolve anything at all or keep they keep on swimming in circles in a fish bowl known as the complex plane?

Anyway I looked at a bunch of video's on this subject and at some point it got truly hilarious: Karl Popper seems to have stated that the best scientists in a particular field of science work hard to prove their core ideas wrong!  

For me that was very funny and hilarious because Karl Popper was a logician and as such a beta scientist just like the physics professors. Now did the physics professors ever once tried to question that electrons are tiny magnets? This whole Karl Popper guy was very naive about how science goes from day to day. As far as I know, if as a physics professor you question the "tiny magnet" model for spin half particles, that is not good for your career. 

Now I do not want to go into the discussion that viewing electrons as magnetic monopoles is a paradigm shift, I see it more as crossing the t's and dotting the i's while only remarking that it is weird physics professors are that stupid for that long.
Let me show you only a small section of my personal background in my computer for the last decade. The upper stuff is math that is known for a long long time, these are the Cauchy Riemann equations and they say you can do differential things in the complex plane just like you do on the real line: 

In the second part of the picture you see some symbol X and that is only some real vector and if you differentiate it you get a basic vector. If you would show that to a math professor that person would not say this is crazy or wrong. No this is very elementary, you are left with the basis vector.

The question is why professional math professors never come up with the easy to find math you find at the bottom of the above picture? These are the 3D version of the Cauchy Riemann equations, so why can't they find it themselves?

Lets leave it with that, I think it is hard to answer the question how science evolves in general. The scientific fields we have today are so different that it is hard to find general conclusion other than "Shallow thinking" or whatever what. End of this update and thanks for your attention. 

(15 Sept 2023) Were the attacks against the port of Sevastopol a sheer coincidence when it comes to timing? Likely it is but for me it is funny that when I name Sevastopol for the very first time, within a few hours that port came under attack... So lets say it is a coincidence and if it's not a coincidence: THANKS for the timing!  

Two items for today: 

 Item 1) A short but good analysis of the attack.
 Item 2) Brian Greene telling a lot of unfounded stuff, why Brian why?

 Item 1) A short but good analysis of the attack.

The Youtube channel "Reporting from Ukraine" is relatively handy because in short videos the news is neatly packed and easy to understand. They did a relatively good analysis although it is hard to say if it precisely happened that was but you get the idea. It was a so called complicated attack and given the result it was done very good. 

Here is what Reporting from Ukraine made from it: 

First water drones, after that S-200's to activate the Russian air defense forces, then those radar seeking missiles and at the end a few Shadow Storm / Scalp missiles to finish it all off. 

Again on details it could be a bit different but grosso modo something like this must have happened. Lets go to the next item.

 Item 2) Brian Greene telling a lot of unfounded stuff, why Brian why?

Brian Greene is one of those American television physics professors. Of course that is not forbidden and he can do it in an entertaining manner so it is not boring television but often it is just so oversimplified that it misses the point.  

Brian is one of those people from who I just do not understand why they do not see themselves what is wrong with electron spin as a tiny magnet, why this wall to wall stupidity? 

In the picture below you see two examples: 

1) All these decimals in the magnetic dipole moment of the electron &
2) Super positions of electron spin that is totally unfounded in experiment.

Example 1) is often used by physics professors to show how superior the standard model of particle physics is. And it looks very impressive, I remember it intimidated me too. Until I found out a bit more details of the experiment and all those folks do is measuring a frequency that is given off by the lone trapped electron they have. That does not say the electron is a tiny magnet as thought by overpaid physics professors.  

Then the theoretical value, that is done by adding up thousands of so called Feynman diagrams so that is very interesting but is there anyone in the world that can check if that all is done correctly? No of course not, we have to believe it on their beautiful blue eyes or so. (I am not saying it is fraud, only that it cannot be checked at all.) 

People like Brian Greene always select stuff like those 12 decimals found and routinely skip all the nonsense that comes with electrons as tiny magnets. They never say that the Pauli exclusion principle says that in atomic bonding the electron pairs have opposite spins, this simply means they bond magnetically via north polo to north pole bridges. Where has the deep rooted knowledge of "Opposite magnetic charges attract, like charges repel" gone?

__________

They even do not have any experimental proof that electrons are in fact tiny magnets, they just assumed it for an entire century or even longer but there is no experiment that says it is so.   

And all that stuff that an electron can also be in a super position of both it's spin states is also not validated by only one experiment. And Brian makes it even more crazy by the stuff he does with two electrons that according to Brian can be in a super position of different spin states that only become clear if you measure them in some kind of direction.

Last year three Nobel prizes have been handed out but the experiments were only done with photons because as one of the prize receivers said: "Doing it with a spin half particle like an electron is just too difficult".

Back in 2015 I realized for the first time that the tiny magnet model for explaining electron magnetism is likely not correct. In the present years I tell it like: Electron spin or electron magnetism is just like the electric charge of the electron:

PERMANENT & MONOPOLE.  

If you don't have that in for example chemical bonding things would constantly fall apart. The electrons in binding electron pairs in all of the proteins of you body never flip their spin. If an electron would do that the binding pair would become a non-binding pair and the protein would break or get damaged every time a magnetic field comes along...

Of course this fucking never happens so why do people like Brian Greene keep on telling all that crap about electron spin when they don't have any experimental proof? Why this level of stupidity and lazy shallow thinking? 

I do not understand at all why the physics professors do not see for themselves that viewing the electron as a tiny magnet leads to so many contradictions. Why are they so fucking stubbornly stupid?

Click on the next picture to see Brian Greene explaining the wisdom the professional physics professors have on electron spin: 

Video title: Brian Greene at the 2023 Aspen Ideas Festival
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LSdU4PThD0

My dear reader this is the eigth's year of simply me trying to explain that electrons are not tiny magnets but have a monopole magnetic charge. All I use is logic and point out that long list of contradictions we get if it was true that electrons are tiny magnets.

Why the fuck do we use taxpayer money to fund the salaries of people like that? May be as a society we should withdraw that tax money from universities and give it to people that make horoscopes. May be that is much much better for society so instead of the crap that Brian tells about electron spin we can enjoy the beautiful insights of people that craft horoscopes...

End of this update, thanks for your attention and till updates. 

(13 Sept 2023) A crazy lot did happen, from earthquakes in Morocco, very bad weather in Lybia and so on and so on. What the war concerns there has also happened a lot, a side effect of the war is the German initiative for a secure sky over Europe or the European Sky Shield Initiative (ESSI). More and more countries are joining and for myself speaking it is very good that Europe tries a bit more to keep it's military pants up and not always rely so much on the USA. But I have been saying that for almost 20 years now so there is not much news besides the important point that it is no happening finally... 

Two items for today: 

Item 1) Elon Musk did what? And Ukraine retook some old oil rigs.
Item 2) Again: Why no Nobel prize for a repeated SG experiment?

  Item 1) Elon Musk did what? And Ukraine retook some old oil rigs.

This crazy stuff seems to have happened one year ago in Sept 2022, let me quote the weird stuff:

Excerpts of a new biography of Musk published by The Washington Post last  week revealed that the Ukrainians in September 2022 had asked for the  Starlink support to attack Russian naval vessels based at the Crimean port of  Sevastopol. Musk had refused due to concerns that Russia would launch a  nuclear attack in response.

Source: Elon Musk’s refusal to have Starlink support Ukraine attack in Crimea raises questions for Pentagon Link used: https://apnews.com/article/spacex-ukraine-starlink-russia-air-force-
fde93d9a69d7dbd1326022ecfdbc53c2 

Comment: Now I don't want to go into all the details for the Pentagon and stuff and I would like to remark it was very important the Ukrainians got that starlink stuff for communication. And may be Elon was in some kind of panic and really thought it would raise the level to a full blown nuclear war. 
This kind of behavior based on limited insights of risk is  not very helpful, on the contrary it is highly counter productive. You shouldn't behave that way, for example I never tell Ukraine what to do. Not only because it is none of my business but it all goes much better if they can set out their own path on how to conduct this war. If everybody comes along with a long list of wishes, that brings the UA in an impossible situation. It is their war and we are here to help them as good and bad as we can.

__________

A very interesting development was the taking back of the Boiko towers who were lost by Ukraine when the illegal annexation of Crimea was done by Russia. It also gives a nice picture:

Lets hope this detail brings a bit more ownership of the Black Sea for the UA maritime forces. Lets go to the next item. 

 Item 2) Again: Why no Nobel prize for a repeated SG experiment?

In sciences like psychology or sociology they have a serious problem: A large portion of all published articles contain research that is not repeatable. Or if it is repeatable most of the time the found result is far less significant. If you understand a bit how those publications emerge, in my view this was an accident waiting to happen. It is a big problem if experiments can't be repeated because that simply says it is not science. After all repeatability is more or less the hallmark of science as we know it. 

Now that might be a big problem for psychology or sociology but in physics they have stuff that they hold for true but have no experimental basis at all. So it is not that the experiment is not repeatable, there is no fucking experiment at all.

An important example is of course that "tiny magnet" model they use for the magnetism of electrons. The physics professors simply assume electrons behave like tiny magnets while they have no experimental evidence at all for that claim. 

Last update I showed you that video about a repeat in the year 1967 of the Stern-Gerlach experiment from 1921 or so. Now the theory says that if you make another SG experiment after the first one, that will act as a reset for the electron spin.
So a beam of electrons (or atoms like in the video) gets split in two by a magnetic field and after that another magnetic field perpendicular to the first one makes it split again. The theory says the second magnetic field splits the beam again in a 50/50 kind of fashion.

That is all based on the Pauli matrices and work of similar garbage levels. As far as I know there is no experimental proof for that weird Pauli matrices stuff, so why is there no experimental proof at all???

In my view because physics people are people they constantly want confirmation by their peers they are doing the right thing. I name that process "Trying to score social coins". And the most important social coin for physics people is of course the Nobel prize in physics. 

Compared to just doing science, in my view almost all physics professors mostly try to score social points or social coins. And in the last century of time, if your experiment validated the three Pauli matrices you would almost be sure of a Nobel prize. So the Physics crowd hungry for that social coin must have tried a few times to try to prove the Pauli matrices via experiment.

Of course it never worked because the idea's of Wolfgang Pauli were totally and utter crap: You really cannot call that collection of ideas a theory of physics because it is based on nothing at all. Electron magnetism is likely just like electron electric stuff: permanent and monopole. 

If in the last century of time you as an experimental physics person would have successfully done a repeated SG experiment, you likely would have won a Nobel prize for that.

As far as I know there is never ever a Nobel prize handed out for that kind of experiment. So a reasonable person would say: "Hey may be there is something wrong with our understanding of electron spin".  

But no, a century of time and zero physics persons remarking that. They only follow stupid dogma like the Gauss law of magnetism and the fake scientists never realize that they have a problem here. 

So in the year 1967 they finished this beautiful looking machine but it has no repeater at the end because the Pauli matrices are a total crap from a weirdo that sometimes signed his letters with "The Geisel Gottes". 

That was it for this update, thanks for your attention (I know that if you do not know much about electron spin it is hard to read what I write, so thanks for your attention). 

Till updates.  

(08 Sept 2023) No, I am not in a talkative mood today so lets go to the two items for this update. 

Item 1) When will those small diameter bombs arrive? No idea...
Item 2) Beautiful old video on the SG experiment found.

  Item 1) When will those small diameter bombs arrive? No idea...

There seem to be delays although I did not read why. So that's a pity, wasn't September originally the planning or so? I only did a quick google news search and the oldest article that popped up was a Reuters one:

Title: Exclusive: U.S. weighs sending 100-mile strike weapon to Ukraine
Link used: https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/100-mile-
strike-weapon-weighed-ukraine-arms-makers-wrestle-with-demand-
sources-2022-11-28/

As you see that was Nov last year. Likely there is a lot of unforeseen stuff going on or whatever what.  

Since I am not in a talkative mood today, I found an article that is for sure the longest article I found in this entire war. The above picture is also from there although I added the black on bottom and top. 

Title: Perseverance and Adaptation: Ukraine’s Counteroffensive at Three Months (Michael Kofman and Rob Lee)

In itself you must have some perseverance to read the entire commentary.  

Lets go to the next item.  

 Item 2) Beautiful old video on the SG experiment found.

This is a video on Youtube containing an old American documentary from the year 1967 and there they demonstrate an upgraded version of the original Stern Gerlach experiment. The machinery is all beautiful old style stuff, it even contains and oven to turn a piece of metal into vapor.

In itself the video shows no other explanations of the observed results in the SG experiment (the splitting in two of the silver atom beam when exposed to magnetism) compared to how it is told today.

That means of course that in the video electrons are supposed to be tiny magnets and just like today the long array of problems that come with that idea are just not talked about. Or a tiny bit like in the next picture you see the anti align arrangement of a bar magnet in an inhomogeneous magnetic field.  

The professor tells that it is not that easy and you see below in the picture what he tries to do. Please remark that there are four thin ropes holding up the magnet, suppose you would have only two ropes and they are glued against the north and south pole of the magnet. Could you ever find a stable anti alignment in that two rope arrangement? No way, it is a so called instable equilibrium.

(Remark that in the picture above only one coil is on in order to get that inhomogeneous magnetic field.) 

As always it is never explained in only a tiny part why electrons would behave this way, why do they anti align? Yet if you view the electrons as magnetic monopoles you do not have these crazy energy problems: all electrons only try to get to the lowest possible potential energy.
Even if that means going into the direction of a lower magnetic field strength like in the Stern Gerlach experiment. 

The video is about 25 minutes long. Although beautifully built in itself the machine is not needed at all. Back when I was 4 years old the only televisions there were all had a tube with an electron cannon in it. So with a strong enough magnets you could split the electron beam in two. But usage of magnets around those old televisions also damaged the fluorescent stuff on the inside of the tube so the television became worthless for normal use.

And they had no reason to do so either: everybody believed that electrons were tiny magnets so why try to prove otherwise?

Video: The Stern-Gerlach Experiment (ESI 1967)
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcTqcyv-V1I

Why is this belief that electrons are tiny magnets so persistent? It leads to explanations that in a permanent magnet all electron spins align and that explains it all. To the other extreme where the so called Pauli exclusion principle says that in chemistry the binding electron pairs must have opposite spin and as such they must anti align. 

That is just fucking totally illogical and it is only not logical because you must have that with that stupid tiny magnet model for the electron.

Ok ok may be I got a bit talkative along the way, let our ways part until we meet again. Thanks for your attention. 

(06 Sept 2023) It was a beautiful day today because of the weather in this ending of summer 2023. So I did not see much news and we can go to the two items for today.

Item 1) Shorty on corruption.
Item 2) A chemistry guy explaining electron spin as a vector.

  Item 1) Shorty on corruption.

Lately there was some scandal in Ukraine about corruption where rich kids could avoid military duty via paying for a certified medical condition. I didn't know that, I just read it today. 

Anyway back when I was a soldier in the 1980-ties I remember that it was well known that sons of medics often were so ill that they could not serve. It was not there were zero sons of doctors and specialists in the military  service, but it was far below what you should expect. 

The latter is more an abuse of power, the one specialist sends his son to a friend for some medical testing and later he tests the son of his friend and all stay out of military service. While the UA stuff is clearly an unwelcome form of corruption. 

All in all I consider this an internal Ukraine matter. Beside that I am not much an expert into how you can tackle corruptive behavior in an efficient manner. Lets look at a very good photo:  

On this detail of corruption I cannot say much, as far as I know it is not that weaponry and ammo gets sold on black markets or so... So it's not a total chaos and if there is room for improvement I just wish the UA folks good luck. Lets go to the next item, it's a bit hardcore for some of my readers I guess so if you are into that category you can easily skip it and live happily ever after...;)  

 Item 2) A chemistry guy explaining electron spin as a vector.

As far as I understand the official version of electron spin (the tiny magnet model and magnetism as a vector), the chemical guy in the video does a good job at explaining how it all hangs together. By the way the name of this chemical guy is Michael Evans.

Contrary to the official version of electron spin I think the magnetic properties of the electron are just like it's electric properties:
permanent and monopole. 

That means electrons are magnetic monopoles while generations of physics professors have stated that they can't find magnetic monopoles. So they keep on producing more and more complicated theories and models like the Ising model that always use tiny magnets.  

The way electron spin was dealt with was very much in line with how (linear) polarization of light works where if you change the angle of the polarization filter you get different results. With electron spin they think if you change the direction or angle of the applied magnetic field, that changes the probability distribution over the diverse spin states.  

In my world this never happens, spin states are permanent magnetic charges and as such they never flip their spin so to say. Therefore the situation could not be more different: a permanent monopole magnetic charge against a version of electron magnetism where you can apply the Heisenberg uncertainty principle????? (Click on the picture to land at the video:) 

Now I absolutely don't want to ridicule Michael Evans who made this video, the stuff he says is widely seen as the standard way of explaining the magnetic stuff.

For me it is still a bewilderment as why these people never see all the logical problems there are with the so called "tiny magnet" model of electron magnetism. A simple thing is for example the miracle of an electron "anti-aligning" themselves against a magnetic field. Why should an electron turn it's magnetic north pole against the applied north pole? Why physics people, why?

Well they don't, electrons have a monopole permanent magnetic charge so they never align or anti align with magnetic fields.

It is all fucking overly complicated, this "tiny magnet" or magnetism as a vector is so complicated that we can wonder if it is true. Do you believe the next bullshit? 

The two electrons are in different energy levels but net magnetization is zero using the "tiny magnet" model. I mean this is bullshit, the two electrons are separated in space but find some way of keeping their vectors perfectly at zero?

Get a life and stop using taxpayer money to promote this madness. 

End of this update, thanks for your attention. 

(01 Sept 2023) Is that so called Suroviken line breached in Ukraine? For what is known now it is only at one point so it is still fragile. Lets hope the Ukrainians will have some good luck but also some good brains. Let me wish the UA fighters in the south good luck with this...: GOOD LUCK!  

Item 1) A huge drone attack on Russia, even in Pskov...
Item 2) Curious droid on magnetron usage in WWII.

 Item 1) A huge drone attack on Russia, even in Pskov...

To be honest until yesterday I was not aware of a place named Pskov, but that seems to be about 600 km away from UA. If the drones come from Ukraine, that is a long distance to fly undetected.  

Those attacks against Russia are often a bit portrayed like attacks from inside Russia itself versus attacks from UA territory. Of course likely both things are playing out at the same time. 

If the text that came with the picture is correct, below is the result from the attack on Pskov: 

Some Russian dude came out stating that Ukraine can only fly these drones so far undetected because of help from Western intel. For myself speaking I do not think Western intel agencies can figure out from outside Russia what path to fly.  

 Item 2) Curious droid on magnetron usage in WWII.

Today I came across this video from Curious droid (or is it Droid?) and to be honest I still don't know in detail how a magnetron works. How can it pump out so much energy at such relative long wavelengths? May be the stuff only works because electrons are magnetic monopoles, I do not know.

After the video I was not much wiser on how such a common thing like a part of your magnetron oven works, the video itself was very interesting all in all. I never knew that a magnetron was so important for radar, but yes radar uses frequencies like that. For example if you look at a rain radar on your local weather news service, you can never see rain made from very small droplets.  

The video is also interesting because it shows how a relative small decision of some autocratic from of life can influence the outcome of large military conflicts like WWII. 

As usual click on the picture for the video: 

Video title: The Device that Won WW2 - The Cavity Magnetron
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbTWzC86R4Y

So I am not much wiser about how a magnetron actually works and why such machines needs those relatively strong magnets in order to work. That has to wait for another day I guess.

End of this update & thanks for your attention. 

(30 Aug 2023) Two days ago after working about 9 years long, my old computer broke down. Normally I have at least one spare computer so it should not be much of a problem or so. Well actually my website was stored on one of those old hard disk drives from before the SATA cables became common (those broad cables as you had them in your computer in the past.

So I had no access to the website files and of course I do not make a backup that I store on another hard disk every day, the latest was from May this year. So I downloaded my own homepage (this page) and hang it into the old backup and voila it looks like it works. That was only 15 to 20 minutes work and as such I could avoid pumping all content over via cut and paste text and images...;( 

But now the font has changed, I always use Times New Roman and I don't know how to apply that to all text now it has changed.  

So just a very short update for today, these are the two items: 

Item 1) Ok it is caricature, but it is funny anyway.
Item 2) Wolfgang Pauli or Paul Dirac: Who did the most damage?

  Item 1) Ok it is caricature, but it is funny anyway.

Because of the war I too often portray the Russians as some stereotype or a caricature. That is funny to do but you must not believe in that in order to avoid thinking they are real stupid.

Often Russians are not stupid at all but they find themselves back into that interesting political system they have over there. But I liked the picture I found on one of those 'Today in Russia' kind of video's. And with a title like that you often already know what is coming. 

As a whole it is a perfect composition: The rubber boots, the booze, a cigarette, the bride clothing and of course the smile or smirk she has.  

Lets go to the next item: 

 Item 2) Wolfgang Pauli or Paul Dirac: Who did the most damage?

Both Dirac and Pauli are known because of their contributions to quantum mechanics in general and electron spin in particular. It is also no secret that both Dirac & Pauli believed into the so called 'tiny magnet' model for electron magnetism while I think electrons are magnetic monopoles so no tiny magnet model for me. 

I don't link to it but the Paul Dirac guy had some very interesting equations and he had four of them: Two related to the electron and two related to the anti electron or the positron. The two for the electron are split up between the two spin states and the same goes for the positron. Hence four equations that he solved with 4x4 matrices, indeed an interesting mathematical feature. 

But it never dawned on Paul that there are in fact four different particles with each their share of electric and magnetic monopole charge.  

And what about Wolfgang Pauli? In quantum mechanics it is often thought that particles are in all kinds of super positions, why this is is unknown to me. As such Mr. Pauli had his so called Pauli matrices that you can use for estimates of possible spin measurement outcomes. 
If for example you turn the magnetic field 90 degrees, that should always serve as a reset of previous electron spin and now you must have a 50/50 split between spin up and spin down. 

The three Pauli matrices are for just one electron, if you look at multiple spin systems the whole thing explodes into large matrices. 

As far as I know, in about one hundred years of time there has never been an experiment validating the Pauli matrices. The calculations the physics professors make about electron spin in a turned magnetic field look a lot like how linear polarized light behaves. Only you now have half an angle alpha while with polarization you have one whole angle alpha. 

If in one century of time there is no experiment validating that weird stuff, I can safely conclude it is very likely a bag of bullshit. It's not even a theory because the magnetic charge of the electron is very much like the electric charge: permanent and monopole. 

So that is in a very stark contrast to Paul Dirac who, let me put it in a larger font, had the honor of: 

People found experimental evidence for the positron, the first anti particle was discovered! 

And not so much, as far as I know it is completely zero, experimental evidence for the predictive nature of the Pauli matrices.  

(Source of the photo's: https://www.thefamouspeople.com/profiles/
paul-adrien-maurice-dirac-4044.php

In the present years in the science of psychology there is a bit problem going on because a lot of the published results fail to be repeatable. If you think about that you can find a lot of reasons as why the present situation is that bad: 

The publish or perish culture, the art of p-hacking, formulating your hypothesis after you did the statistical collection of date, the hunt for spectacular results or even click bait stuff and so on and so on.

In psychology at least they understand they have a problem is you cannot repeat a lot of experiments, after all if it is not repeatable it is likely garbage.
In physics they are even unaware they have a problem if they just never validate that indeed electrons are tiny magnets as they always claim to be...

That was it for this update, thanks for your attention. 

(25 Aug 2023) This is still a hot war because there is so much happening every week. Interesting highlights were the blasting of that S400 system in Crimea. And with an interesting human touch, the Ukrainians got a helicopter full spare parts for Russian planes delivered. The helicopter pilot had already his wife and or family inside the UA so there was no danger to them, in itself a crazy story but thumbs up for that Russian helicopter pilot.

Two items for today: 

 Item 1) Prigozhen had his last barbeque?
 Item 2) The basic flaw (loophole) in those Bell experiments.

 Item 1) Prigozhen had his last barbeque?

Well if he is dead I can say it was a colorful guy. It often looked as his guys, those Wagner soldiers, completely trusted him. And that is a stark contrast with how officers are looked upon inside the Russian army.  

Let me not comment any further, dead is dead so why waste my time? 

Before we go to the next item, I found a nice new stamp from Ukraine, it is in the next link: 

Title: New Ukraine stamp shows F-16 jets 'rubbing out' Kremlin
Link used: https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20230804-new-ukraine-stamp-
shows-f-16-jets-rubbing-out-kremlin

It shows the F16 stuff lives a lot among the Ukrainians, that is logical of course but I would like to caution against unrealistic expectations. But it would be great if UA would be a bit more master of her own sky. 

Lets go to the next item: 

  Item 2) The basic flaw (loophole) in those Bell experiments.

Back in the year 2015 or so there were three experiments coming out claiming they had done a so called 'loophole free' Bell test or Bell experiment. I remember I downloaded the pdf that the TU Delft had out from the preprint archive, but it was all very complicated. Now 2015 was (if memory serves) also the year that I figured out that likely electrons are not tiny magnets but magnetic monopoles, so I was fresh busy with that idea and as such the TU Delft pdf was too complicated to be helpful. 

Yesterday I came across a short video from Nature and right there in the beginning you can see where the whole experiment goes wrong: It starts with the assumption that both electrons are in a superposition of both spin states. The last years more and more I converged to the idea that electrons have a permanent magnetic charge, just like their electric charge is also permanent and not a fragile 'quantum state' or so.
Click on the picture for the video from Nature: 

Video title: Quantum ‘spookiness' explained
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Dp27XYjHuk 

Like said before: The only place in the universe where electrons flip their spin is inside the heads of the physics professors. In condensed matter for example no thermal shaking does make a single spin flip. And if a photon is observed that has precisely the energy difference between the two spin states, in all likelihood that is an electron replaced such that the potential energy is a tiny be lower. Think for example as the usage in astronomy of the 21 cm hydrogen spectral line.  

So my view on electron spin is radical different from the official version as seen in the video. And always the people making those video's never ever arrive at the idea they don't have any proof via experiment that electrons are tiny magnets. It's 100% idiot, there are also no elementary particles that are electric dipoles, even a neutron is named a neutron and is not a tiny electric dipole.

As a contrast I have a video about chiral materials and once more we observe that in chiral materials it is possible to get spin separation of the electrons. This makes only sense if there are two kinds of electrons, so it is not true that all electrons are the same and electron spin is a 'tiny magnet'.

The video is from back when we had the COVID restrictions, it lasts about 15 minutes. The female researcher sounds very competent and may be her understanding of the stuff involved would benefit greatly from viewing electrons as permanent magnetic monopoles. Will she do that ever?
I doubt it, doing so will be very bad for her career because everybody will think she is a crazy bitch and avoid her in all ways possible. Or do you have a more positive view on humans?

As usual click on the picture in order to see the video: 

My guestimate is that the directional separation of electron spin according to their magnetic charge is an important ingredient in the solution of the so called protein folding problem. But I never looked into that on a more detailed level because to be honest I do not know much about chemistry.

So the summary of this update is: Individual electrons cannot be in a super position of the two spin states. Electron spin states are not tiny magnets pointing into some direction but monopole charges that are permanent. As such things like a maximum entangled electron pair is also no possible.

But if it is not possible, how did they get three times that experimental result back in 2015?
That is may be a nice update for some future date. Below you see a picture where I summarize it a bit more, Bell states for pairs of electrons are fucking impossible.  

Just like it is fucking impossible to have eyes like that without a lot of work. As far as I know this is the face of a real human and not an AI thing, so we can safely conclude that all of her electron pairs hold her together because the electrons in those pairs have opposite magnetic charge.

End of this update, thanks for your attention and see you around. 

(23 Aug 2023) Only after the last update from Thursday news came out that the USA allows for transfer of F16's to Ukraine. So let me place a more or less formal Thanks! to the USA. Today it emerged that Greece also wants to join the F16 coalition, so that is great also.

It is already a bit late and I am a bit tired so only one item for today:  

Item 1) All of a sudden the F16 stuff goes blazingly fast, they didn't let much grass grow over it.

  Item 1) All of a sudden the F16 stuff goes blazingly fast, they didn't let much grass grow over it.

By accident I came across that news of the visit of the US president Zelensky, sometimes I just do not want to read any news a day long because that brings some good calmness around. Anyway I was surprised to see this on Sunday: 

There is some confusion around the numbers but if I understand it correctly we have 42 F16's and 24 of them are still in active duty before they will be replaced by the new F35 stuff in the future. So that would be 18 pieces and if I remember it correct that was also the number where Denmark came out with. 

So how will Russia react? I do not expect the Kremlin to have much trouble with it. After all media outlet RT often tells it like it is and they explained that these 50 year old planes will not make much of a difference. It is much older as the latest Russian war planes, they are worn out and often hang together with pieces of wallpaper and zip ties. So I do not expect much words of wisdom from the Kremlin. 

I forgot to copy & paste the link to the video but if you want to see it for some reason it is one of the latest vids from the guy named professor Gerdes.  

Now it is understandable that from the Ukrainian side there is a lot of expectation around all this air power F16 stuff. As such there is a huge possibility that there will be a lot of pressure on the shoulders of the new UA F16 pilots. I think that is not very good, it would be great that people just understood these are just pilots trying to do their job and that's it. 

Before we split I would like to repeat that one of the conditions of the delivery is of course the F16's are only used inside Ukraine. At this point in time it is hard to see when this condition can be lifted, that is more a future thing I guess.  

Let me try  to upload this stuff  to the internet and thanks for your attention. 

(18 Aug 2023) It was a relaxed day over here, just like the rest of summer relatively cool. Lets go to the two items for today, they are not that long:

 Item 1) Footage of a sea drone named Sea Baby.
 Item 2) Cute distribution of the speed of the solar wind around the sun.

  Item 1) Footage of a sea drone named Sea Baby.

Yesterday or today this footage was released, if I understand it correctly this was that thing that did the blast at the Kerch bridge when also the railroad was damaged? If so I remember at the time there was also that footage of a truck and it was strongly suggested it was a truck bomb.
I considered that a strange assumption, the Ukrainians don't use suicide bombers. That is not a part of their culture.

I too had wild speculations at the time: how did they get those explosives there? Of course most of the time I just don't write down wild speculation but I was a bit thinking along the lines of a submarine. Anyway it looks like the footage from today is sincere and this was the thing that did it: 

This is all a very interesting development, a remote controlled sea drone loaded with 850 kg of explosives. Stuff like this is mostly hand made so it looks expensive for such a small boat but it's a lot of work. And if it can sink Russian warships it is still a very cheap way to do this.
It was Zelensky that once said drones like this are about half a million a pop and at first you think that is a lot for an upgraded waterski but half a million could be a reasonable price. 

 Item 2) Cute distribution of the speed of the solar wind around the sun.

The solar wind is a beautiful phenomenon, the physics people have no idea how it works and likely that is all caused by their weird idea's that elementary particles like electrons must be magnetic dipoles for some weird reason.
And if you  keep on thinking such nonsense, it is hard to explain why the solar atmosphere, the corona, is so very hot. If fact the corona is so hot that it actually heats the sun, how does it get it's energy?

Well I think that elementary particles like electrons are magnetic monopoles and that non-elementary particles like neutrons and protons carry magnetic charge so they too are not 'tiny magnets'. The bullshit from the physics community is easy to understand: If electrons are tiny magnets, they should be neutral under that application of magnetic fields just like the neutron does nothing when confronted with an electric field.

The 'tiny magnet' model is just plain stupid and it leads to all kinds of weird stuff like the Pauli exclusion principle where in electron pairs the electrons must have opposite spins. That simply means those tiny magnets (the electrons) bind via north pole to north pole binding or south pole against south pole.
I hope you agree with me that somewhere in the last century that idea of all particles must always be tiny magnets has run off the rails somewhere.
After all even children often know that magnets bind to each other only if you have opposite poles, why physics professors don't see that for themselves is one of the greatest mysteries of physics: Why is it beneficial to be that stupid?

In the picture you see a beautiful statistical representation of the data found around solar wind speeds. For me it is not very handy, the plasma in the solar wind is made up of very different particles like electrons, protons and atomic nuclei like helium. They all have their own 'solar wind speed' so let us assume that in this picture we likely look at what can be detected: proton speed.  

It is important to understand this graph is from a time during the solar minimum where the magnetic activity of our sun is minimal. I do not know what IMF means. The interesting feature of this graph is of course that so many protons have more or less the same speed when you look outside the solar equatorial plane.  

If magnetism plays such an important role, why is there no higher wind speed at the solar poles? I think that if the sun is billions of years old we are looking at an equilibrium that has been set since the formation of our sun: it must be strongly positive in the electric sense. But you never hear astronomers talk about such stuff, for them the sun is like neutral forever. 

Ok it is time to upload this tiny update. Thanks for your attention. 

(16 Aug 2023) Two items for this update: 

Item 1) The adventures of the Russian ruble.
Item 2) A SixtySymbols scientist on that LK-99 superconducting nonsense.

 Item 1) The adventures of the Russian ruble.

In the beginning of this year the price cap for Russian oil and oil products came into effect via the usage of insurance: If the stuff was above the price cap it became illegal to issue such insurance. It was a miracle and it was even more of a miracle it actually worked... 

Last week the russian ruble was valued at under one euro cent and this week the US$ had the same thing: over one 100 ruble for every dollar. As such everybody felt the need to comment upon that, now may be not everybody but a lot of bloggers did.

The best video out there was from TLDR because they had some precious information that is in line with the things you can expect from the oil price cap from Jan this year: The correlation between oil prices and ruble strength is lost.

So I am humming with satisfaction and I would like to thank all those who helped these complicated oil price cap sanctions in place!  

The graph in the picture below is from TLDR but I have no idea who composed the information into this particular graph. The value of the ruble against the dollar is inverted and by doing so you see a bit easier that it looks like correlation is lost. Click on the picture for the TLDR video: 

Video title: Why is the Ruble (Still) Declining?
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TqQeVmuhX8 

Of course when looking at a complicated thing like a currency exchange rate like the Russian ruble against other currencies, a lot of factors come into play. What I did not expect was the Russian central bank buying up foreign currency with ruble (or did they sell some gold???) so they had some buffer of foreign money in case new sanctions would be there.

That's just lovely, shall we slap more sanctions on that bitch named Russia? 

 Item 2) A SixtySymbols scientist on that LK-99 superconducting nonsense.

A few weeks back there was this news that a material was discovered that could do super conductivity at room temperature and above. I did not even try to get that pdf from the preprint archive because very very likely it was just another bag of nonsense.

Yet in the physics community it resonated loud and all kinds of opinions were ventilated that this was not working at all, results were not reproducible and so on and so on. The video I selected is a UK based physics professor that even wonders why so much attention goes to this nonsense.

Now why is this news interesting? Well I once considered writing an article my favorite subject of electron spin and publish it on the preprint archive only. Just some stuff or some reasons that electron spin is not a tiny magnet but likely a magnetic charge just like the electric charge of an electron.
After giving it some thought I decided not to do that, after all the preprint archive is supposed to be a preprint archive while I never will post anything in say official media like Elsevier or whatever what.  

But this article about LK-99 got all it's attention only because one of the authors simply uploaded it to the preprint archive. So I don't know, write some stupid pdf about electrons being magnetic monopoles or just let those smart professors cook in their own juices forever? 

The Phylip Moriaty guy below is one of those that have no problem with actually testing if an electron is really a tiny magnet. So in my world this guy is not worth his salary, if you cannot see that electrons are magnetic monopoles, your salary is far far to high. A waste of taxpayer money so to say.

Click on the picture for the video upon this nonsense: 

Video title: Bad Science and Room Temperature Superconductors - Sixty Symbols.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zl-AgmoZ5mo

Now why is this LK-99 stuff attacked so hard? Very simple: People like that only attack the weak, the easy prey. People like that do not realize that at some other level, they are stupid to.

For me it was funny to view this video, angry physics professors in action!

Let's end this update so I can pour in a hefty needed pint of beer and wonder once more as why physics professors keep on thinking this weird electron thing, hey guys it's not a tiny magnet...

Till updates.

(11 Aug 2023) No intro talk, just two items:  

Item 1) Explosion in Moscow: interesting manufactory of optical gadgets?
Item 2) Why don't these people grab a Nobel prize in physics? 

 Item 1) Explosion in Moscow: interesting manufactory of optical gadgets?

That looks like a very big boom, a clear mushroom shaped cloud and that is not made by some small explosion. Here is how it looked: 

Totally crazy and may be another tiny baby step towards where we would like the Russian military to be where they belong: Broke, bankrupt and without resources. 

The news was also funny because if something serious happens in Russia at first nobody knows what the official position will be and as such come up with weird stuff like, quote:

An emergency service source told RIA Novosti that a preliminary investigation found that the explosion was caused by “a violation of the technological process.” The plant reportedly manufactures night vision goggles and binoculars for the Russian military. 

Source: https://www.thedailybeast.com/massive-explosion-at-plant-near-moscow-leaves-dozens-injured  

Lets go to the next item. 

 Item 2) Why don't these people grab a Nobel prize in physics? 

You can check it for yourself: Go to Youtube and search for videos about "Repeated Stern Gerlach experiment". You will get some videos but they are all just animations, in the 101 years since the Stern Gerlach experiment these is still no experimental validation as what happens if you repeat the Stern Gerlach thing twice... 

If you as a reader have no clue what I am talking about, just look at a  few of those video's and realize if this experiment is repeated with a magnetic field that is rotated 90 degrees you should get a 50/50 split in the electrons going through.

That is the official version of stuff as "thought out" by guys like Pauli long ago. My version of electron spin says that electrons are not tiny magnets but magnetic monopoles and on top of that this magnetic charge is permanent just like the electric charge of the electron.

If you use that monopole or magnetic charge serious you see a lot of problems inside the so called Standard Model for particle physics disappear fast. Weird stuff like the anti-alignment of the magnetic field of an electron with the applied external magnetic field. There is just so much nonsense generated by the stupid idea that electrons "must be" tiny magnets.

The physics professors have zero experimental evidence that electrons are tiny magnets at all and these weirdo's don't think that is a problem. And, as far as I know, there is no successful demonstration that all that crap like in the Pauli matrices is true in reality.

Show me the fucking experiment or shot up your stupid talk about electron spin.

__________

If my version of electron spin carries more truths as the official bag of garbage, in that case it is nonsense that an electron can be in a superposition of spin up and spin down. The next idea is totally garbage:

The robot has nothing to do with it, the idea that electrons can be in quantum states like super position is widespread while it lacks experimental validation or verification. Only people talking out of their neck like in the next video about spinors:

Spinors for Beginners 4: Quantum Spin States (Stern-Gerlach Experiment)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQOUhDEj4O8 

__________

Now isn't it easy to understand that if you were a physics person in the last 101 years and you could validate with an experiment these theoretical results from the Pauli guy with his matrices, in that case you would almost one 100% sure you get a Nobel prize & the medal that comes along. It's so easy: just build that machine and grab your Nobel prize...

Well my dear reader, Nobel prizes like that have never been handed out (anyway I have never heard of it). But since it was so easy to likely get that prize, why are there no published records of such validation?

I think it has been tried many times, but all those experiments in the last 100 years just failed.

And that explains why we only have animations of this kind of nonsense in the year 2023.
And the physics professors will have another year of doing nothing at all, as such life is normal.

End of this update, thanks for your attention. 

(09 Aug 2023) Two items: 

Item 1) Nice drone action at Novorossiysk (that's far away from Ukraine).
Item 2) There is a form of oxygen that can burn??? Yes that's singlet oxygen.

 Item 1) Nice drone action at Novorossiysk (that's far away from Ukraine).

And another of those relatively strange names for us here: Novorossiysk. Just like that habit that makes a lot of names end on ski or sky. But as a contrast the Ukrainians do not have a presidentski, it is just like other nations a president. And I still have to find a ski-resort in Ukraine that has the name:

Ski Resortski. 

A few weeks back the mental outlays at the Kremlin found it wise to withdraw from the grain agreement and they were that stupid to say that from now on all ships going to Ukraine will be considered as weapon transports.

Why are they always so mental at the Kremlin? They are as stupid as a bunch of math professors. The Kremlin mentals don't understand that war is a dynamic process and as such you can be paid back with the same coin if needed.

Just like Russia bombarding all those non-military targets but when they get some little stuff back like lately on that huge bridge the mental crybabies from the Kremlin sing in concert about the evil of such a terrorist attack.

Anyway the video footage was perfect and it is an amazing distance away from where these drones are supposedly to start (somewhere at the UA coast relatively far away).  

In case you missed all this boat stuff (later a tanker was also hit, once more a small but good lesson for the Kremlin mentals), I found a UA news outlet for further reading: 

Attack on “Olenegorsk miner”: the Russians were able to hold the ship to the port (photo) 
Link used:  https://ukrainetoday.org/2023/08/04/attack-on-olenegorsk-miner-the-russians-were-
able-to-hold-the-ship-to-the-port-photo/ 

An awful lot more did happen, there is also lots of fighting in the landwar although the amounts of land changing hand is not that large due to  the well known problems there are. But are they back in Bakhmut? I didn't follow that one lately... 

 Item 2) There is a form of oxygen that can burn??? Yes that's singlet oxygen.

Since I knew that molecular oxygen has a so called non-binding electron pair I was curious if there was also a form of oxygen that has a normal electron pair in it. Those bonding and non-bonding electron pairs from the chemical sciences are very confusing if you view electron spin as a tiny magnet as the official version of electron spin is.
For example in a bonding or binding electron pair the electrons must have opposite spins, that is known as the Pauli exclusion principle. Yet this means that those pairs must bond or bind via north pole to north pole bridges or a south pole version of a connecting bridge. That is not only hard to phantom, it sounds like it is impossible. And that is why people from the chemical sciences never explain it like a "north pole to north pole" kind of binding because it sounds so ridiculous.

And it is: If you just view electrons as a magnetic monopole, now it means that a binding electron pair has a monopole south and a monopole north pole in it. As such chemical binding or bond formation is once more that in magnetism north attracts south or vice versa.

The official version of electron spin as 'tiny magnet' leads to logical nonsense while the magnetic monopole model for the electron (and all other spin half particles) makes things a lot more logical. Now a non-binding electron pair are two electrons of the same magnetic charge and as such will have a dramatic difference on the electron cloud around some atomic nucleus.

I often wonder as why the scientists in question do not see for themselves that the tiny magnet model for quantum spin leads to nonsense after nonsense after nonsense. What explains that weird kind of behavior? Why is the thinking process always so shallow, electron magnetism is just like the electric charge of the electron: permanent and non-flip able.

Yesterday I came across a very good video from the Action Lab (a Youtube channel) and all the details I missed were in there. So I wrote a small post about it on the other website. The post contains a video that contains some weird advertisement for rolling metal balls over your skin and you better skip stuff like that. In my view if you have skin problems you better first take a good look at the food you eat, in my own life my health really improved when I stopped eating all stuff gluten related. 

It's getting late so here is the link to the other website with the latest post, as usual click on the picture: 

To me at first it was very curious as why oxygen needs a non-binding electron pair. If the above information is correct you also see the answer: Triplet oxygen is not linear and as such the average distance between all the particles that make up the oxygen is likely less below that of the singlet version that much more looks like a linear molecule. 

End of this update, see you around. 

(04 Aug 2023) Oh oh, only two days ago I wished that the entire Black Sea fleet from Russia would be destroyed, today comes one of those UA bloggers with the news one of the Russian patrol vessels was damaged. About five injured and one dead Russian sailor.

So with a bit of luck and a bit more of this may be the grain transports from Ukraine can go on. On the other hand if Russia really is going to attack merchandise ships what to do than?  

Item 1) Joe Blogs says Russia missing 75 billion $ in gas revenue & EU gas storage.

 Item 1) Joe Blogs says Russia missing 75 billion $ in gas revenue & EU gas storage.

Joe claims that until now Russia has lost about 75 billion US$ in gas revenues. He does not explain as why gas prices are so low lately, after all were promised that withoout Russian gas and only liquid gas prices would be six fold. 

All in all it looks like the transition away from Russian gas has not lead to serious upheaval. But before declaring victory on the gas front, lets see how next winter will unfold.

The reserves in the diverse countries are building up but no country can store say an entire year of gas consumption. The way I look at it is that it would be good if we had a common strategic gas reserve (like the federal oil reserves in the USA but now for gas).
A minimum of such an EU gas reserve something like six months but 10 months would be better? I don't know how realistic this is, how much store capacity is there possible?  

Furthermore there should not be one giant reserve reservoir because if in the future we meet a better military opponent as Russia is, it should not be possible to destroy our gas reserve with just a few bunker busters.

All in all this is just some strategic thinking, there is no need for sudden or urgent action although it is obvious for every person that right now small expansions like in the picture below are welcome. If the info from Joe is correct, say France has a very low level of filled gas reserve and what they have now in store is only about 9% of the annual usage.

Anyway click on the picture for the video from Joe blogs that goes into a bit more detail:   

The title's of Joe his vids are often a tiny bit over the top. But he has to compete into that video landscape as offered by Youtube so titles like "An expansion of EU gas reserves could be of strategic interest" does not get much views. 

Video title: RUSSIAN Gas Disaster as $75 Billion Revenue Evaporates But Europe Faces More Issues in Winter 2023. Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jndFPCWDUck 

In my view the Russian loss of say 75 billion US$ in revenue is not a "Disaster" but a welcome and tiny step inside the framework of downgrading Russian military might to the extend they can never ever repeat to another EU nation what they do to Ukraine. 

The strategy is simple to understand: We don't want that kind of warfare any longer in Europe so every one that tries to do that must be crushed, killed & slaughtered. 

I have spoken. Till updates and thanks for your attention.

(02 Aug 2023) Two items for today: 

Item 1) A small Moscow attack and some comments on that stupid free grain deal from Russia.
Item 2) Two new updates on the other website.

 Item 1) A small Moscow attack and some comments on that stupid free grain deal from Russia.

Two days on a row the same building was hit in Moscow. It is hard to say where those drones come from, it is amazing that Russian radar can't deal with that. Until now these drones are relative small so can only take a rather small payload, I expect over the next years the drones will get better and better.  

Most people in Moscow are not aware of anything because there is no air alarm going off.  

Further reading, BBC: Ukraine war: Kyiv warns Russia as Moscow skyscraper hit in second drone attack. Link used: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66368016 

Quote from Zelensky: Although Ukraine has not claimed responsibility for specific incidents, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said attacks on Russian territory are an "inevitable, natural and absolutely fair process". 

Comment: I am totally fine with these kind of attacks. Of course UA can't use any of the given aid from NATO member countries for that but if you assemble drones yourself inside Ukraine with parts you buy or make, as far as I am concerned this is all fine.  

__________

The bright light Putin offered an amazing 50 thousand ton grain for free to the six most poor African countries. In the last year about 750 thousand ton of grain from Ukraine was distributed via the UN food programs, so that is over ten times what Russia has to offer.

If Russia really is going to attack grain ships and as such the transport of food will go to zero, the UN organization can say goodbye to UA grain. So if this year we will see famine in Africa, why not ask your Russians friend for help? 

As far as I am concerned, if in the future we can destroy the entire Russian fleet in the Black Sea, that would be a good thing. Lets go to the next item.

 Item 2) Two new updates on the other website.

The oldest update was from a pdf I found back in the time we looked at the advanced Pythagoras stuff. So I began a bit enthusiast with that but later my enthusiasm dimmed remarkably. I was interested in the part about a differential operator but that turned out to be a bit to shallow and not carefully thought out. 

Remarks on a pdf about a generalized form of the cross product.

The other post is about that video from Micheal Penn where he claims 3D complex numbers do not exist. When I viewed the video from the first time I felt a bit offended by this giant mountain of stupidity. So at first I felt the desire to attack that video but a day later I considered that too childish and that mood lasted for about a week. 

I am getting so tired with math 'professors'  like this (I don't know if Michael is a real university professor), the ways they think about complex numbers is always so shallow. You can joke they only understand the complex plane and since it is a plane it is shallow by definition...

In math there are many fantasies going round that weirdly enough shape the landscape of math thinking in a deep way. The 3D numbers do not exist is one of those unfounded things, you cannot expand the complex plane to three dimensional space and the weirdo's think 3D complex number do not exist.  

Why do we fork out tax money to a bunch of idiots?

Another example: Counter examples to the last theorem of Pierre de Fermat. It is widely believed such counter examples do not exist because Andrew Wiles proved in the 90-ties that the last theorem of Fermat was correct. But it is amazingly simple to find a lot of counter examples, in the next picture I only show you a few done with the real integers using the so called modular arithmetic.

You can make an amazing amount of counter examples to the last theorem of Pierre de Fermat using only the integers modulo 210. And the math professors, they kept on sleeping year in year out.
Click on the picture for the latest post from the other website:

Title of the latest post: And another of those “We cannot find the 3D complex numbers” video’s. 

Childish or not, this video has already about 150 thousand views in just 3 weeks. So this is very helpful if you are a math professor and you want your science to be stable or so. But for me it is not helpful, people believe that kind of shit and we can't have that.

End of this update, see you around. 

(28 July 2023) From this update on I can now post pictures as wide as 550 pixels on this website or better: inside the table that I use on this very home page. So if I want to repost something from the other website, this now goes a bit more handy.

Something bad happened this week: I became 60 years of age. Bah I don't like it at all but it is what it is because there is nothing you can do about your age.  

Dutch media outlets reported that American officials has said that Ukraine released military reserves that were trained by Western forces and have good modern equipment. If so, and who am I to doubt this, once more GOOD LUCK to the UA military.  

This is now how the 100 pixel more wide pictures look:  

For today I have only one item, not about the present war, electron spin or monopoles stuff. No lately I have been looking at some relative good video's about WWII as made by Mark Felton. 

Item 1) Waffen SS soldiers guarding the Nuremberg trials?

 Item 1) Waffen SS soldiers guarding the Nuremberg trials?

If you like history you should definitely see some of those Mark Felton productions. Ok ok WWII must also be your cup of tea but who doesn't like that war? Ok ok there will be some elderly complaining it was a pretty shitty war with giant amounts of damage and loss of life.  

When two totalitarian regimes clash like the fascists and the Sovjet Union communists, the life of ordinary men or women is not worth much. Stalin with for example his stupid do not surrender order and the fascists with their weird hunt for Jews. If your government is made up of thugs, that is the kind of stuff you get. 

The video's made by Mark via his Mark Felton productions are interesting to watch, it contains a lot of interesting detail and lots of good historical material. For example Mark comes up with a swastika on a Western insignia, it's amazing: 

It's meant symbolic: The whole nazi thing as symbolized by the swastika is weighted upon the scales of justice. Click on the above picture for the video from Mark Felton. 

Video title: Waffen-SS Soldiers Guarded the Nuremberg Trials
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qcEFnGeZ6A 

Here you see a bunch of shiny happy people from those long lost years: 

That brings us already to the end of this update. Nothing of the realm of madness that is electron spin, no crazy stuff like in a bonding electron pair the spins must anti-align, these physics people are crazy to the bone. This update is a small realm of madness from the 1940-ties. 

That was it, see you next week or so. 

(26 July 2023) No intro talk, just two items:

Item 1) In howfar is this a depressing UA statistic?
Item 2) NMR runs on magnetic monopoles, is there a relation with flipping coins? 

 Item 1) In howfar is this a depressing UA statistic?

I was a bit cleaning out this hole that is supposed to be my living room and the Paul guy from War Veteran Reacts is on a Youtube video. And Paul is complaining that Anthony Blinken is spinning the US stuff and blah blah this and that. 

Then he shows a map and yes that look depressing. So this evening I decided to look it up for myself at warblogger and yes it looks depressing but the graph ends at March this year.  

The map itself is a good idea; it shows you losses and gains as a percentage of the whole of Ukraine. I hope you can read it, click on the picture for a larger screenshot:

Picture source: https://www.warmapper.org/stats 

Lets not do difficult, there are a lot of problems. Large parts of Ukraine are mined and as Paul remarks we don't have industry sized methods of getting rid of those mines. The lack of 155 mm shells, almost no air power and so on and so on. 

So it is hard for them and I wish them luck. 

Lets go to the next item:

 Item 2) NMR runs on magnetic monopoles, is there a relation with flipping coins? 

A couple of years back I dived a bit into this but the last week and a half I picked it up again because all that magnetic resonance stuff only works because electrons and protons carry net magnetic charge. 

As such they are magnetic monopoles, for the proton it can be a bit more complicated but we also view the proton as an electric monopole so I do the same with it's magnetic charge.

Now how does nuclear magnetic resonance work? The principle is simple:  

1) Apply a strong and constant magnetic field, say vertically,
2) Perpendicular on that apply a vibrating magnetic field that makes the stuff resonate.  

I always thought that those machines (also the medical devices) use the same vibrating frequency because that was the frequency where protons like to dance on. But no they seem to work on all kinds of frequencies and in order to compare between machines they often us that ppm stuff. 

Ppm stuff? Yes that parts per million stuff but now not a concentration or so but a dilution of the applied frequency of the vibrating magnetic field. Suppose there is an 'energy shift' of 6 ppm while the applied frequency is 5 MHz, in that case that proton will vibrate about 30 HZ less. It is very confusing if you don't know that.

In rough lines, why does it work? In my view it works because the static and constant magnetic field pulls or pushes at the protons until they have a nice tension so that indeed they can start resonating.

If you have a guitar, piano or violin, those string instruments only work if the snares have the proper tension. That is what is happening in those magnetic resonance things.

Because the official version of magnetism says that monopoles do not exist, the official explanation is one of those many shaky explanations: The applied constant magnetic field makes all atomic magnetic dipoles align with that. And the resonance observed from the vibrating magnetic field is that Lamor resonance frequency or so.

NMR is not something you can learn in just one video, if you want to know more about it look at least a dozen of them before you have a nice sharp understanding of what all is going on over there. (And may be read a few papers.)

For example in the right upper corner of the next picture you see two kinds of hydrogen (two 'kinds' because they give different peaks in the output of those NMR  machines). It is claimed the one hydrogen atom labeled H_a is responsible for the three peaks you see on the left:

I hope you are amazed: How can one hydrogen atom attached to some molecule give three different resonance frequencies? That sounds impossible or not?
Well it has to do with the magnetic configuration of the two H_b atoms, they have an influence on the frequency at which H_a resonates.

That influence is given by the spin states of the two other hydrogen atoms: both spin up, both spin down and the two possibilities with opposite spins. Of course in my world the word spin stands for monopole magnetic charge while in the world of overpaid professors it is the alignment of the protons...

There are many video's out there on this interesting subject, I took the above screen shot from the next video:

Spin Spin Splitting - N+1 Rule - Multiplicity - Proton NMR Spectroscopy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJKfl3w52Mk 

You must that that N + 1 rule from the video with a little grain of salt: It is chemistry so if they give you some rule you already know there will be chemical examples where for some reason the rule is not valid.

After all it is chemistry and as such they have to deal with the real world, they get feedback from nature so to say. What has this stuff to do with rolling dice? Well the two protons H_b can have only 3 different magnetic states in case they are magnetic monopoles. I hope you see the analogy with coin flipping.

And that is a good time to end this update.
Thanks for your attention and see you in a future update.

(21 July 2023) A lot has happened like the Russian attacks on Odessa where about 60 thousand ton of grain for China was destroyed or rendered inedible. Of course the Russian attacks are never a terrorist attack because once the weirdo's tell Putin some military target was hit, all of a sudden the Kremlin weirdo's sing that song regardless of what actually happened. Two items for today: 

Item 1) Why are these Russian non oil & gas revenues so strange? (Joe Blogs)
Item 2) On Deepmind's Alphafold; how does it work?

 Item 1) Why are these Russian non oil & gas revenues so strange? (Joe Blogs)

Joe Blogs took the time to flea through the figures as published in Russia on stuff like state revenues out of oil and gas, deficits and so on. The video is a bit long but most of the stuff I wanted you to see is in the first half. 

Now I do not know much about accountancy but as Joe shows the revenues from the non oil & gas revenues are very very weird. It is anybody's guess what is sold to outside Russia and it has a very strange pattern: It starts in Jan with a relative small number and every month this number climbs. 

I don't know what is going on but are they mixing in some weird money? And is that weird money actually the printing press from their central bank? I hope you can read it, one day I must fix this website's maximum picture of 450 pixels wide so try to read it. It's crazy, click on the picture for the video: 

Video title: RUSSIAN Economic Crash Deepens - Oil & Gas Revenues Crash 49% in First 6 Months of 2023. Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqTpb1oqKsg

Now Joe makes a big fuss about the fact that in about 6 months the reserves of Russia have run out because the war is rather expensive. But that is not the point of many troubles for Russia, that is the point in time where federal funding is mostly done by the Russian central bank. 

That is what I am waiting for all along... 

 Item 2) On Deepmind's Alphafold; how does it work?

One or two months back I showed you a chemistry professor who I classified as a nutjob becaue he showed the chemical bonds in a molecule as having opposite spins. 

As a matter of fact this is correct if you follow the standard crap from physics: Electrons in a pair in an atom or in a molecule must have opposite spin. That goes for bonding pairs anyway, but that means that the bonding is done via north pole against north pole or via a south pole bridge. 

After all the weirdo's from physics believe without any experimental proof that electrons are tiny magnets and in that case opposite spin or anti-alignment simply meant north-north pole bridges or the south pole version.

And if you say something about that, this nonsense is explained via quantum numbers and or the Pauli exclusion principle. That is simply what you get with electrons that are magnetic dipoles.

I think for years that electrons are magnetic monopoles and now the exclusion principle for the electron pair means you have a north pole to south pole binding. And in the anti-bonding electron pairs as we observe in molecules like oxygen, alignment means equal spins and that explains the behavior of say the oxygen molecule O2.

Today I looked at a video from Deepmind about the Alphafolding ai that guesses how a protein unfolds into it's shape as needed for biology. At first I thought they made an improvement upon the simulation as show by the nutty professor because they used two colors. It was just a few seconds they showed this picture but here it is:

Video title: AlphaFold: The making of a scientific breakthrough
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gg7WjuFs8F4

You see all that blue stuff likely represents electron pair binding but it is always blue. The improvement is there are now also red endings so the ai named Alphafold has figured out it needs two colors. 

I also work or think from the hypothesis that the monopole magnetic charge of electrons is permanent. So if the protein starts folding itself, there must be the right kind of electrons everywhere where it binds. A weaker condition would be that in the binding places electrons just must have opposite spins.

Do you see this is rather different from how the chemical professors explain it? If electrons cannot flip their spin state in that case the right kind of electron must be there in the right place in the right time. So that makes biological life more difficult and likely explains why in those chiral molecules we have spin separation for electrons.

On the other hand if the magnetic charge of the electrons is permanent, if their spin state is permanent, in that case biological life can use electrons as a binary memory mechanism for storing information. Just like in our computers.

For example inside DNA you only find information about the actual content of proteins and there is a bunch of stuff with the stupid name 'junk' DNA and that regulates a bit when genes are expressed or shut down. But once produced we know of nothing that tells a particular protein where to go and what to do. 

As far as I know biologists have never found a store of information that tells an organism like a plant or a animal where all that protein stuff has to go. 

So that is what I found today, once more like so many years now it is impossible to kill the idea that electrons are not fucking tiny magnets. They are magnetic monopoles. 

The Deepmind employees will likely never pick up on this rather easy to understand stuff: magnetic dipole electrons are just not possible. So how can I be so sure about that, after all you can find this very text on the internet it is not hidden or so?

Well the monthly income of the Deepmind employees is likely above my entire yearly income, as such I expect the same overpaid arrogance as I observe for 30+ years with math professors and 7+ years with physics professors.

So I don't care, all I know I had a nice day today with thinking a bit about protein folding and how that could work with electrons from nature and not electrons from the brains of physics professors...

End of this update. 

(19 July 2023) After days and days of suffering I finally went to  the doctor. Back at home I take the first pill, it is that heavy duty stuff that can have a lot of side effects. Anyway the thing does it's work and within an hour that raging inflammation goes down fast. That fucking gout is a real stupid disease, humans are never genetically selected against gout that's why it has it's strange characteristics like ridiculously hefty amounts of inflammation while the body does not need it at all. It's a bit like Russia, nobody needs it and it only destroys a lot of things.

And the grain deal fell apart, no idea if the shipments can go on regardless. Anyway now I feel like a human again, here are the two items for this update:     

Item 1) Information processing inside the Kremlin.
Item 2) Magnetic mirrors: how stupid can this be?

  Item 1) Information processing inside the Kremlin.

I wanted to combine two video's but I couldn't find that interview with Putin back for a few days ago. It was just Putin with one reporter asking questions. Very interesting was the remark made by Putin that UA soldies are afraid to go into say a Leopard because those are the ones that are sought out the most by the Russian soldiers...

So these Kremlin folks tell him stuff like that and likely he believes it. That is also how we come at those crazy numbers when it comes to destroyed UA equipment. Ok ok they loose a lot right now but not say 50 HIMARS systems. Therefore the next time you see that Russian army spokesperson standing next to all those crazy numbers of UA losses, you can ask yourself why he is doing that? Well if Putin is told there are now 50 destroyed HIMARS systems, you cannot change that number. 

As such that Kremlin information circus goes from crazy to worse. 

A guy named professor Gerdes has a nice video on why Putin decided to attack Ukraine and if that information is grosso modo ok it is very interesting. Here is the link: 

Video title: Why Putin disastrously Invaded Ukraine. Here's What happened.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Atvv526lnLU

__________ 

May be this is the video where Gerdes says that in the past UA already tried to transform their armed forces because back in the time they already tried to get NATO membership. And I thought may be I was a bit to rough in the previous video on Ukrainian membership of NATO.  

Right now the political landscape is still in favor of Ukraine, who know if in a few years of time it will still be so but if so why not? Beside emotion there are also rigid military reasons for that, right now the UA army is far better for combat against Russia as most EU armies. Let's be real, there is so much underinvestment in so many armies... 

 Item 2) Magnetic mirrors: how stupid can this be?

If you like me think that electrons, protons and neutrons, particles known as spin half particles, are magnetic monopoles in that case you think the idea of a 'magnetic mirror' horrible. 

Till recently I never heard of this method but I was aware of the strange way Lockheed Martin tried to build a nuclear fusion reactor in the last decade. They failed of course but I remember it was one of those managers from Lockheed Martin that said nuclear plasma was diamagnetic.  

It seems that in the USA all this magnetic mirror stuff was a thing for many years. Today I looked a bit deeper in it and I will not say they were all 100% crazy. For example if you approach a cloud of plasma with a magnetic field, indeed some part gets pushed away while the other part gets attracted (assuming all plasma particles have spin). 

On top of that, all the six coils in such a thing will have say the north pole pointing inwards. And yes you can trap some plasma this way because that are precisely the plasma particles with a north pole charge. So the fact that they are magnetic monopoles is what makes the trapping possible. 

So it is not 100% from crazyland but it will of course never produce any energy... 

Video title: Special Lecture: Challenges With Polywell Fusion - Spring 2023
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CNnNJylnOQ 

When I saw this kind of stuff in about 0.7 seconds I thought this is a disaster design dome by some people that truly do not know what they are doing. But Matthew who makes the video has looked at it for seven years he say in the start of the video.

So I wondered if you would confront Matthew with say the instabilities in a large tokamak, would he figure out that most plasma particles are magnetic monopoles. How long would a person like this need if it took him seven years to dissmiss the concept of a magnetic mirror?

And on another scale, why do the physics professors not see for themselves that thinking of electrons as tiny magnet only gives a boatload of very shitty results. Results like in chemical bonding with electron pairs, this bonding is done via north pole to north pole bridges otherwise the electrons would not have opposite spin.

That is obviously bullshit, so why is nobody pointing out it is bullshit? 

Just like that magnetic mirror mania in the USA, why did they believe plasma is diamagnetic? If you think it is diamagnetic you don't understand much about magnetism.

Not that I know much about it, the magnetic properties of atomic nuclei are totally crazy so I keep my mouth shut. But saying that likely electrons are magnetic monopoles, why is that so hard?  

Ok, lets end this update and upload it to our internet. Thanks for your attention.  

(14 July 2023) Two items for this update: 

Item 1) But what actually is in that article 5 of NATO?
Item 2) Times Radio Wuhan documentary (COVID origins) part 2.

 Item 1) But what actually is in that article 5 of NATO?

The NATO top has come and gone, I didn't have much time to digest the news. Anyway it didn't end in a brawl. For myself speaking I don't care if there is no time path to NATO membership of Ukraine. I have nothing against UA membership  of NATO but like said before: there must not be some nuclear tail to this all.
That is a rational thing to achieve, you can paint that as NATO being to coward to fight but that is too emotional in my view.

Anyway what do you think when you hear about NATO and the famous article 5? Most people think stuff like "If you attack just one NATO member you get the whole bunch over you." Now a UK military analyst remarked that the actual text is very different but he did not elaborate much. To be honest I have never ever in my file felt the desire to look that article up but it is a very easy find on the internet. Let me quote: 

Article 5

The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security .

https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_17120.htm  

So yes it is indeed a bit less forthcoming that if you only point to my small brother I will ram your head off kind of interpretation. But over the years the interpretation might have shifted a little bit. Interesting detail is that if NATO decides to application of this article, they must inform the Security Council. I had no clue about that.

If needed humans can do a lot of work and put in many hours day in day out. But if you can never relax, there is a point for every human that they will snap. The Ukrainians are now about 500 days into this so in my view it is very much allowed to ventilate a bit of anger and frustration.

That's ok, we all humans and that means if your brain works properly you have all those emotional states.  

And likely there is not a week vacation for all, I mean there is a war going on... 

 Item 2) Times Radio Wuhan documentary (COVID origins) part 2.

A few weeks back I posted that Times Radio video about the origins of the COVID19 epidemic. From the beginning I always thought that a lab leak was the most probable thing and I wondered what all that fuss about a food market was.

For the food market start of the global epidemic there should have been an intermediary animal species bringing the virus from a bat to a human. Until now such an intermediary animal has not been found.

That does not mean this proves the lab leak hypothesis. To be honest I have not a tiny shred of proof for the lab leak hypothesis. All I know is what my math gut feelings say and they say the likelihood of originating from the Wuhan lab for virology is a big multiple compared to the suggested food market origin.  

Furthermore I don't know much about viruses so I can not estimate in how far there has been genetic modification or selection of this original COVIS19 variant. And my trust in the average university employee is not that high, so if in a documentary like this they talk about experts I always take that with a grain of salt.

In the Times video they also talk about research done in the Wuhan virus lab for the Chinese military suggesting there was study of biological warfare. I can tell you the Chinese would never do such stupid things: Placing a bio lab in a multi million city and after that investigate the nice parts of possible biological warfare. No no, Chinese are so wise they would never do such stupid stuff... 

Video title: Wuhan Institute and Chinese Military ran covert project, say US investigators | Stories of our Times.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WyhNVAAA26w 

That was it for this update. Thanks for your attention.

(12 July 2023) And all of a sudden Sweden is in, so welcome to NATO! It is unknown why Turkey stopped halting the entry of Sweden and I don't know if Hungary keeps on doing weird whenever they can... 

There is a NATO summit and Ukraine lashed a bit out as why there is no time path to NATO membership. Well I can understand the frustration but as soon as UA is a NATO member it can ask for Article 5 activation and may be after that we are very soon in a nuclear conflict. And that is an outcome that should be avoided in my opinion. But of course it is frustrating for the Ukrainians, they have to do all the fighting and they collect all the direct war damage and destruction. And also for a person like me it is frustrating, we can't apply our air power to a bunch of Russian trenches so that later the US soldiers can much more easily go there.
It is what it is and that goes for everybody. 

Two items for today: 

Item 1) Cluster munitions & a video from Anders Puck Nielsen.
Item 2) A math Youtuber explaining the 3D complex numbers don't exist.

  Item 1) Cluster munitions & a video from Anders Puck Nielsen.

A number of months ago I asked the question "Shall we give area weapons to Ukraine?" And in that update we looked at cluster ammo. It is forbidden in a lot of countries because there is always a significant dose of bomblets that didn't explode. And because of that a lot of cluster ammo is made shiny and colorful leading to all kinds of children trying to pick it up later because of the color.  

The design flaw of this weapon is easy to understand: it are all individual small bombs. There is also a design that has one big kernel of explosives surrounded by hundreds of small metal balls. That is far better because if a metal ball does not hit a target it is just a piece of metal. 

I have no idea of there is stock enough of that latest kind of design, may be it is just a design that has never been brought to live. Now my view is that if the Ukrainians want to use them themselves it should be ok. But I can understand people have different opinions of this detail of the war.  

Anders Puck Nielsen has a new video out and he does a good explanation what is considered maneuver warfare versus attritional warfare or better: how these go hand in hand.

Of course there are plenty of reasons as why a blitzfast war is not possible: Not enough air power for the UA, lack of shells for artillery so yes it is hard for Ukraine. 

Video title: How is the war going? — Mid July 2023
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fR9HJnYXoc 

 Item 2) A math Youtubber explaining the 3D complex numbers don't exist.

This is one of those "We can't find the 3D complex numbers" and this one is from Michael Penn who tries to make one math video a day. Often his videos are ok for Youtube: Not to easy and not to difficult so that's fine.

At first I was a bit irritated by the video and thought about writing a good rant because if you are irritated that is often a funny thing to do. But this time I would like to skip that rant stuff and look where it all runs out of the rails. Because in my view 3D complex numbers are a thing, why does Michael think they are not?

Well the math professors have some idea's about what kind of properties those 3D complex numbers must have. As Michael puts it: You want those numbers to have some pleasant properties.  

That is where it runs out of the rails: Michael thinks you must demand beforehand that there are no so called divisors of zero. If you do math research and you you 'demand' weird stuff often you will find nothing.

Math professor searching for 3D complex numbers always want a 3D extension of the 2D complex numbers. That is just fucking stupid, for example the determinant of the number -1 is +1 on the 2D complex plane but in 3D it is minus one. So such an extension is impossible for many reasons.
But does that mean 3D complex numbers do not exist? That is a stupid conclusion the math professors keep on making decade in decade out.

Click on the picture for the video:

Video title: Why are there no 3 dimensional "complex numbers"?
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-3AbJM-o0g 

I have to say that I myself did indulge in this sin too: Projecting all kinds of expectations on it and when it turns out otherwise I just stopped researching the stuff.

One of my long term blunders was the next: On the complex plane the length of a product of two numbers is the product of their original length's. In class you are told this is an important property of the complex numbers.
So I thought that in other number systems like my own 3D complex numbers there must exist a norm such that you have the same property as on the complex plane.

Believe me you can waste a lot of time with believing weird stuff because later it turned out that this multiplicative behavior of the length was simply related to eigen values. The underlying eigen values that all complex numbers have explain perfectly why on the 2D complex numbers you have stuff like "The norm of the product is the product of the norms".

But 100% of math professors will not find out what the role of eigen values is when it comes to all kinds of complex numbers. If you know a math professor yourself you can easily check it by asking this person the next question:

Oh holy math professor thye cognition is what lights up the sky! Now a low creeping figure named Reinko told me that the complex number z = 1 + 5i has two eigen values! Can you tell me what they are thye holy math professor?

If your math professor has to think about it too long, it is clear this person has never thought that 2D complex numbers have eigen values too. In particular eigen values have eigen values themselves, if your math professor has never thought about that it likely is one of those shallow thinking figures like Michael out there.

Ok lets call it a day and try to get this stuff uploaded to the largest can of rubbish humans have: the internet. Till updates my dear reader. 

(07 July 2023) That was weird: We had a summer storm yesterday. Max windpeak speed was something like 146 km/h so it was definitely not nothing.

Item 1) Very short war update.
Item 2) Advertisement for a new and an old math post.

 Item 1) Very short war update.

Of all crazy news of course I wanted to have the next picture in this long story: 

Who would have thought that Prigozhin could dress up so nice? If the Russians have more nice stuff, for example Prigozhin as a drag queen, I think they should share it with the world. 

In the meantime the Ukrainians still try to get Bakhmut back, it has no military but a lot of symbolic value, and they are making progress in encircling that part of UA.

There wasn't much news from the F16 front so I guess that by now pilot training has begun. On a website from the Dutch military forces I found the next cute picture of F16's: 

That is an impressive amount of fire power... And it hurts so much and so deep in my heart: We could have sold them to another army and with the proceeds PAY OFF THE DEBT! And now we are giving them away for free to some bunch of East Europeans??? 

Of course it is not for me to decide, but is giving at least about 10 F16's to Ukraine not a good idea? I mean later when the rebuilding of Ukraine starts, that is when they have to borrow countless billions. So the UA folks must not pay to much for the present day F16 stuff. 

Lets go to the next item. 

 Item 2) Advertisement for a new and an old math post.

The latest post on the other website is about those spin selection rules that say that spin flip does not occur during the transition of electrons in atoms or molecules. And that means that likely electron spin is a permanent property and ha ha ha, the electrons are the long sought magnetic monopoles. 

If it is true that all electrons are the same as the physics professors think, how come these tiny differences in energy levels due to electron spin not solved by a bit of say thermal shaking? Why don't they fall to a lower energy level? 

Anyway here is a link to the latest math post on the other website:

Spin selection rules and the permanency of magnetic charge of the electron. 

And once more I want to repeat that I do not understand why physics and say chemistry professors don't see for themselves that if you view the electron as a tiny magnet you run in all kinds of problems. 

But the problem runs deep because the physics professors also have no experimental proof at all that the electron is a tiny magnet. The deep problem is that they don't view it as a problem at all.  

The idiots use the Gauss law for magnetism as some kind of axiom to the science of physics. And these idiots, these physics professors they HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THAT. Fucked up weirdo's, physics is not an axiomatic science my dear overpaid physics professors...

__________

The old post is from the year 2016 so about seven years back. At the time I had just started the other website because I thought that may be the title of this very website is what kept math professors from acting normal.

It didn't help, the math professors still can't find the three dimensional complex numbers. The old post from 2016 is about seven properties of the famous number alpha. Alpha is the center of the complex exponential for the 3D complex numbers and it has all kinds of fascinating properties. 

For myself speaking I am still very proud upon the seventh property from seven years back. Click on the picture for the old post, if you do that you will find out that post links back to this website when I still published 3D complex number stuff around here...: 

That will be the end of this update. Thanks for your attention. 

 (05 July 2023) No intro today, just two items: 

Item 1) UA nuclear power plant & DW video on the Wagner stuff.
Item 2) Molecular bonding theory: The most stupid theory ever?

 Item 1) UA nuclear power plant & DW video on the Wagner stuff.

Last week I did read a few times that from 06 July on the personnel at the UA giant nuclear power plant had to leave. Of course that is a weird demand by the Russians, on top of that the Ukrainian intel services clam Russia had mined the power plant to such an extent that a radioactive release is possible... 

Hard to say if Russia will go and do weird stuff like this. And if the wind is such that the radioactive stuff will flow to NATO countries, can we view this as an attack on a NATO member? In that case we could make chopped meat of all Russian forces inside Ukraine and the whole thing would be over in 72 hours or so... 

__________

Deutsche Well Conflict Zone has a video out where they interview a Russian FSB analyst. It is of interest because the guy himself is from Russia. If he would go back to Russia he would serve 10 years in prison, so he is one of the victims of the repressive Russian regime. Click on the picture for the video, it was about 30 minutes long if I remember it correctly:

Video title: FSB analyst: Russian security services did nothing to stop Wagner 
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLCC2SkBHNI 

 Item 2) Molecular bonding theory: The most stupid theory ever?

One of the many big faults coming with viewing electrons as tiny magnets is the weird fact that for an electron pair to exist at all, the spins must be opposite. That is very very strange because it means the magnetic fields of the electrons must anti-align themselves and as such form a bond. 

In the science of chemistry they have bonding and anti-bonding electron pairs, the weird thing is that in the bonding pair the electrons must anti align themselves and in the anti-boding pair the electrons must be aligned. 

This is 100% the opposite of what a logical thinking person would expect. You would not expect in a chemical bond that there are north pole to north pole bridges and the same for south pole like bridges. So I few days back I wondered how they talk themselves out of this public relations nightmare?

That branch of chemistry is named Molecular Orbital (bonding) theory or MO theory. And they never ever mentioned the role spin plays, no spin isn't mentioned at all and now the explanation goes as next:

1) Electrons are also waves and have a wave function.
2) The two wave functions in an electron pair can be in phase with each other or out of phase. When they are out of phase the wave functions cancel each other.
3) In a bonding pair the wave functions interfere positively.
4) In an anti-bonding pair the wave functions cancel each other out.

Over the years I have seen a lot of stupidity. Stupidity like "How do we know the electron has two magnetic poles? That is because of the Stern-Gerlach experiment where we get TWO BEAMS!"

But molecular orbital theory is even more stupid: If the electrons in a non-binding pair have the same spins, how come their wave functions are not the same and out of phase?

This is one of the many examples where if you view the electron as magnetic monopoles suddenly everything is much more logical. Now a bonding pair is a monopole north electron combined with a monopole south electron. And a non bonding pair has the same magnetic charges, that is why they repel and not that weird wave function stuff.   

(Click on picture for the video) Here is a screenshot that for all the right reasons looks a bit confusing: 

Video title: Molecular Orbital Theory - Bonding & Antibonding MO - Bond Order
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tB6E6R_XpQ

I considered it funny how they explain away the tiny detail that in the anti bonding pair the electrons have the same spin. After all when physics professors explain a permanent magnet, they always show you pictures with plenty and lots of aligned electrons in it. And that is what causes the macroscopic object know as bar magnet to work they say.

So on the macroscopic level this is what makes a permanent magnet while in chemistry bonding this is the root cause for the anti bonding pair.

Once more I wonder as why physics and chemistry professors do not see all those faults that come with viewing electrons as tiny magnets. They just aren't, electrons are magnetic monopoles and likely the magnetic charge they carry is permanent so 'spin flip' is a thing never observed in nature. Spin flip is only in the mind...

The only place in the universe where electrons flip their spin is inside the heads of the physics professors. In practice I have never seen solid proof that spin flip is possible at all but lets call it a day and upload this weird stuff to the internet.

Till updates & thanks for your attention.  

(30 June 2023) I am tired from a lack of sleep and on top of that I have a rather serious lower back pain. So I am not in a perfect mood but I want to post just one item that until today I did not know too. It's about the Stalin purge in the Red Army.

It is hard to say how this Wagner stuff will influence the war in Ukraine. For example on the one hand the Russian military lost the use of 25 thousand Wagner fighters while on the other hand for them things like logistics are now easier.
Eu leaders are a bit concerned that the Wagener group gets three military basis in Belarus while there will also go Russian nukes to Belarus. On their own these two things are already worrying but combined it is likely not a good thing.
Indeed a nuclear armed Prigozhin sitting in Belarus is a weird idea.  

Let us go to today's 2 items: 

Item 1) The 1941 Red Army purge.
Item 2) Just an old unused picture that I found.

 Item 1) The 1941 Red Army purge.

I knew that before world war 2 the Red Army officers corps was severely decimated by Joseph Stalin. Because there now is a purge going on in Russia related to that Prigozhin stuff I decided to look it up in a wiki.  

What new was for me that even during world war 2 this purge of the Russian military just kept going on. That's kinda weird, the Russians were at war with the fascists but in the meantime this kind of purge stuff just kept on going. 

From history we know the fascists lost so although it looks like the present purge is a good thing for Ukraine, it is not something that will bring victory guaranteed. But if the Russians start executing their own officers corps once more, that would indeed be a good thing. Who knows. 

Wow those were the days where a true Russian hero like Beria cleaned up the Russian military ranks. People in  Russia love Stalin because he was such a great leader and I love Stalin because he killed so many Russians...:) 

But serious, the reason Russia is still a rather strange country today is of course the work of people like Stalin, in that sense the Russians have been unlucky. And say for yourself: suppose Stalin was a far better leader even capable of later building a good economy that could compete with the USA.  

In that case the present war would be far more difficult although you can also argue that if you would have normal leadership in the Kremlin we would not have the present war at all. 

And may be there isn't a wide scale purge going on at all, just few people here and there. After all it were some milbloggers who said this, so it could be rumors. 

  Item 2) Just an old unused picture that I found.

On an old data stick I found this unused picture back:

So what is it? 

It is the collection of three dimensional complex numbers that have a determinant of plus or minus one. And if you pick two 3D complex numbers from this double 'trumpet shape' and you multiply them, you will stay on this double trumpet shape. 

It's not really trumpet shaped, it goes to infinity along a plane and along a line as you see. So it's an infinite trumpet but it doesn't make a sound.

Inside math this is know as a group, a very simple structure with only one operation and in this case the operation is multiplication along the rules of the 3D complex numbers.

All in all it looks a lot like multiplication of real numbers, if two 3D numbers have both a negative determinant their product will have a positive determinant. 

That was it for this post, let me dump it in that giant garbage can known as the internet. Till updates my dear reader.  

(28 June 2023) There have been a lot of developments a few of them totally crazy like the so called mutiny of the Wagner group and their march on Moscow.
So lets go to the two items of today and as such skip almost 100% of the stuff that happened...  

Item 1) No idea what will happen next, the chaos is still accelerating.
Item 2) Horrible bad idea: The mirror effect in nuclear fusion.

 Item 1) No idea what will happen next, the chaos is still accelerating.

Putin came out with a speech where he thanked the Russian military forces for preventing a civil war. That is a strange remark because the Russian military forces did next to nothing to prevent the push of Wagner towards Moscow. 

What is interesting is that we now observe a bit how stable the Russia is as it was crafted under the eye of a paranoid like Putin. What is it more than a bunch of private militia's all loyal to their local warlord and on top is that is the Russian military? That's not a real country of course. 

Here you can see a bit how good Moscow was defended, I wonder if a barricade like this will stop a bunch of football hooligans let alone a bunch of Wagner group with armored vehicles: 

Like said before I have no plans whatsoever to get Putin replaced. On the contrary suppose the mutiny or coup has gone on and by now we would have Prigozhin as the democratically elected new Russian prez; Would that be an improvement for us? 

Nope, if Putin gets removed why would we get a normal person next time? 

 Item 2) Horrible bad idea: The mirror effect in nuclear fusion.

This year the entire North Atlantic ocean is warming up like crazy. Giant amounts of heat energy get dumped into it smashing previous records. So once more we see that Mr. Climate Change is not a lazy person.  

Will nuclear fusion help us? No, the weirdo's keep on neglecting that their version of electron spin is not right and as such it is hard to see how all those tokamaks will have stable fusion. 

Remark in tokamaks they apply a giant electrical current through the middle of the torus shaped vessel. These currents are huge, up or more as one million amps. That generates a very strong magnetic field in the middle and that stabilizes the plasma. 

In my view where electrons are not tiny magnets but are magnetic monopoles, it is now logical that for a short time the plasma will be more stable.  

Now today by accident I came across this video about the mirror approach and I was like "Is that as horribly stupid as I expect it to be?" And just two or three minutes into the video it was a screaming YES! Yes, totally fucked up stupid stuff.

Now in the magnetic mirror approach it is the more dense magnetic field that somehow causes the plasma to deflect. I got annoyed and irritated by the level of stupidity and after five or ten minutes I gave up on the video.

But later that day I wondered why in the past they thought stuff like this acts as a mirror? Well likely they had done some experiments like shooting or moving a bunch of plasma towards such a electric magnetic coil and they observed that it bounced back.

If you understand that most plasma particles are in fact magnetic monopoles it is easy to understand why a fraction of the plasma bounces back. That is the same as for example throwing a bucket of electrons against something that already has a strong negative electric charge: It will all fly away fast. 

So the idea as discussed in the video is utterly stupid and crap but the video itself is very good with a lot of old material in it. For example the next picture indicates they really did their best back in the time.

And I, I am still so puzzled: How can you believe for one hundred years long or longer that electrons are tiny dipole magnets? Where is your fucking experimental evidence for that detail?

Click on the picture for the video, it is about 30 minutes long:

Video title: Fusion Master Class: Mirrors - 4 of 10
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fk4QYDbm7jc
Video made by: Matthew Moynihan 

Let me leave it with that. Thanks for your attention and let me try to get this new update somewhere on some server so that you can read it. Till updates.

(23 June 2023) In Ukraine things seem to be going a bit too slow, anyway UA prez Zelensky stated such words. I can't help with that of course, part of the problem is that likely Russia is slowly learning how to behave when it comes to fighting. 

There was a bridge named Tsjonhar damaged, this is a bridge to Crimea. I forgot to check how those small diameter bombs are doing, after all beside the rather descriptive name they have an interesting range.  

But it's hard at the frontlines, I understand that. Well let me wish you luck one more time. 

For today two items not related to the war: 

 Item 1) An amazing new brand of laptops; you can REPAIR them!
 Item 2) Shit I can't find that spin flip picture again... Now my update is in ruins.

 Item 1) An amazing new brand of laptops; you can REPAIR them!

The last time I paid for the Windows operating system was Windows 3.11. That was for my first computer and that one was a fully assembled far to expensive computer. Later a family member made one or two computer for me from loose parts you could buy at hobby computer shops. And the last 20+ years I put them together myself. 

The advantage of putting you own computer together is easy to understand: If some part goes broken you can repair it yourself.  

But with laptops all those years this was not possible. It was almost impossible to get computer parts for a laptop and it just wasn't there. 

And now there seems to be a new laptop company that makes what all screwdriver enthusiasts will love: A laptop you can modify, repair and upgrade. And there is also some new housing for a laptop in the making so if you have some spare parts over you can buy the rest and make another laptop. Just like it is with desk computers.

Click on the picture for the video from Hugh Jeffreys. 

Video title: New Laptop Brand Shocked Whole Computer Industry - Framework Laptop - Teardown And Repair Assessment
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vx-Lggf2TXc

It is a bit more expensive (just over one thousand Euro) but if you can repair it, it will last much much longer as a laptop you can't repair... 

__________

Now I never had a laptop because I never needed one. But the last years every now and then I thought if I had one, I would type some Latex math during daytime. As such speeding up the posts on the other website.
Well in my family lately a laptop was freed up and yes why not try it? But then some form of niece life came along stating she needed it for school. So poor uncle Reinko was without laptop again...  

 Item 2) Shit I can't find that spin flip picture again... Now my update is in ruins.

In the previous update I showed you that electrons never flip their spin during transitions between the different energy levels in an atom or molecule. So although the energy differences between the two magnetic states inside one orbital are very tiny, no things like thermal energy or kinetic energy from bumps into other atoms or molecules make the electron flip it's spin.

If you view the electron as a tiny magnet (that is the official version) this is very hard to understand. You can even say it is deeply mysterious. But if you view the electrons as magnetic monopoles with a permanent magnetic charge, all of a sudden this behavior becomes logical. And as soon as it becomes logical, likely physics professors don't want to have to do with that. Quantum mechanics logical? Come on, if you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics.

There is another strong clue as why this magnetic charge of the electron is permanent and just cannot be flipped. In astronomy the 21 cm radio line is rather important because it goes right through a lot of stuff without absorption. In particular it goes right through clouds of atomic hydrogen. But it does not get absorbed so no of the hydrogen atoms in the lowest energy state when it comes to magnetism reacts with the photons of the 21 cm wavelength.  

Question: If the 21 cm wavelength is the energy of a forbidden transition, how is this possible? In my view I think it is never spin flip of an electron but the 21 cm radiation is made when an electron bumps into a hydrogen atom that is in the high energy state when it comes to it's one electron. So the electron simply bumps into the hydrogen atom kicking the other electron out. And the only photon that goes out is that 21 cm wavelength thingeling. 

__________

Bragging. The people from the physics community are always very good at bragging that they have the most significant experiment done with an accuracy of 12 digits! They will brag that they have found the precise value of the electron magnetic moment with a precision of twelve digits!

Anyway last week I was at some internet place where they had done that experiment (Brookhaven laboratories or so) and beside all that bragging they had a picture with an electron spin flip depicted in it.

And now I can't find that picture and html page back, so my update is falling into the water because I can't show you that they are crazy. They measure some frequency and in a complicated manner that is related to the magnetic moment of the electron.

The problem is that only magnetic dipoles have a magnetic moment while magnetic monopoles have not. And if the electron is a magnetic monopole, like I think, what have they been doing over there? I just don't know in detail where this all has gone wrong.

Well I don't have the spin flip picture for you but there is a scheme out how this 12 digit experiment was done. They somehow succeeded into isolating one electron in a so called Penning trap. It is all very interesting:

For those who are interested into this stuff, there is a pdf about the 12 digit thing:

Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment
Link used: https://cfp.physics.northwestern.edu/documents/2022_Electron_
Magnetic_Moment_PRL%20(14).pdf 

That was it for this update, don't forget the overpaid underperforming bad at math physics professors have no experimental proof at al that the electron is indeed a tiny magnet. But they are very good at talking out of their neck without using that human brain so that is life I just guess.

Till updates my dear reader.

(21 June 2023) A lot of weird stuff happened like that Russian tank loaded with six ton of explosives. I want to skip all that and look a tiny bit at how the economical sanctions are working. So lets dive into the two items for today: 

Item 1) Joe Blogs on the Russian economy.
Item 2) Forbidden transitions in electron jumps, oops no spin flip?

 Item 1) Joe Blogs on the Russian economy.

Joe tries to scrape a bit of info about the Russian economy. He also uses Russian sources like the department for finance and central bank stuff. It is hard to say how reliable that kind of info is, if these are professional institutions without all that political hacking it could be reliable. I don't know. 

Anyway it looks like the sanctions are doing their work properly. Again if the reported numbers are more or less correct in that case the estimation from Joe that Russia will run out of reserves within may be 6 to 12 months. But they still have their gold reserves, I didn't follow that detail but if they can liquidate that, that's not good. 

All in all the oil and oil product embargo seems to be working well together with the price cap mechanism. At first I had my doubts because it was all so complicated, but it looks like a job well done! 

Lately Joe has a new video format where we don't look any longer at a guy talking but he has all kinds of video that you can buy on the cheap these days. Sometimes I wonder how much of a picture like below is actually real and how much computer generated video there is in it. All those lights precisely the same color, how realistic is that?

Click on the video for Joe's video on the Russian economy: 

Video title: RUSSIAN Economic Crash Deepens as Oil & Gas Revenues Crash & Economy Suffers $42 Billion Deficit
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2b5QT12fHA

At last I want to remark that after all reserves are depleted the time for money printing has come. That can take a long time before we are at the desired state of the Russian economy. Her economy must be brought back to a size such that she's can't repeat this  Ukrainian war. 

  Item 2) Forbidden transitions in electron jumps, oops no spin flip?

It's now 7 or 8 years I try to figure out if indeed electrons are magnetic monopoles yes or no. Whatever I tried to disprove my old insights, I never succeeded in it. The idea is impossible to kill whatever I tried. 

When you view electrons as being two kinds; monopole north and a south pole version of it, a lot of things become understandable. A basic example is the fact that electron pairs are neutral for magnetic fields while individual electrons are not.

In the beginning I had no clue if electron could flip their magnetic charge, so could a south pole electron flip into a north pole electron? Or is the magnetic charge just like the electric charge: it's permanent.

Over the years I slowly converged on the permanent version. If the magnetic charge, or the spin state as the physics professors say it, is permanent that has all kinds of ramifications for say the chemical sciences.
If the magnetic charge of the electron is permanent, in that case if the electron transitions in the electron shells of the atom or molecule it is a part of, the electron can't flip and as such all kinds of transitions are not possible.  

A few days back I discovered that there is actually a name for this: It is know as so called "Forbidden transitions" but these words are also used when it comes to radioactive decay.  

May be a picture paints a thousand words: 

I remember that years ago I came across that 'singlet' and 'triplet' state when two guys talked about it with great routine. And I had no clue: what the fuck are they talking about???  

That is why I still like this hobby; I learn stuff I never knew was possible.

And if I view my dear electrons as magnetic monopoles, for me it is more logical that some electron jumps are not 'forbidden' but simply impossible because of the conservation of magnetic charge. For me no mystification like 'quantum numbers' but more what looks a bit more logical like a monopole magnetic charge.

Let me leave it with that. Thanks for your attention. 

(16 June 2023) This day it was reported the Ukrainians took about 100 square km back. And that was more than in a single day in the last few months, so slowly the counter offensive comes on steam.

It's late at night so let's dive fast into the two items for today:  

 Item 1) A bit more on the F16 stuff, a so called 'bird coalition'?
 Item 2) Miley Cyrus good at math without clothing? Hope for MANkind?

 Item 1) A bit more on the F16 stuff, a so called 'bird coalition'?

Thursday there was a meeting of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group in Germany. I just didn't have the time to flea through all the developments but a few remarks on the F16 stuff can be made. 

Pilot training is underway or started already. For the time being a limited number of pilots but that can expand in the future. It seems that my home country is willing to pull that cart so they are supposed to play some kind of leader role. Denmark is also into this stuff and Denmark is just a small country like we are.  

Somewhere I read this was nicknamed a bird coalition, that sounds funny but of course these are so called fourth generation fighter jets.  

It has been years and years ago that I for the last time did read some of that US military news, just like in the good ol days, and on a website covering 'breaking news' from the military I found the next: 

Netherlands outlines 3-step F-16 training plan for Ukraine, plus $43.4M air defense package Link used: https://breakingdefense.com/2023/06/netherlands-
outlines-3-step-f-16-training-plan-for-ukraine-plus-43-4m-air-defense-package/

If I would start a website about 'breaking news' upon the Dutch military, in that case I could win the prize for the most boring website in a particular year...;) 

May be we should go to the next item but before I do that in once more wish the UA soldiers good luck. Don't let your ass got shot off!

 Item 2) Miley Cyrus good at math without clothing? Hope for MANkind?

Ok it is bait title because it is about 6D complex numbers and in particular their possible matrix representations. In the upper picture you see my favorite representation, it is based on just one imaginary unit that I name l and it's sixth power equals minus one: l^6 = -1. 

As you see every next column has the entries one row lower while the upper entry is the minus of the lowest entry in the previous column. So that is how the matrix looks if you view them as entries or tiny 1x1 matrices.

Oh I see now there are still two typo's in it: two minus signs are missing in the fourth column.

Anyway, this 6x6 matrix is also made up of nine small 2x2 matrices. As you see along the main diagonal these three 2x2 matrices are the same (yes typo says no). The other six 2x2 matrices follow also the pattern for 3D complex numbers. 

But this 6x6 matrix is also made of four 3x3 minor matrices, the structure of these four minors is the same as the matrix for numbers from the 2D complex plane. 

That is why this kind of representation is my favorite. 

Now what has this to do with Miley Cyrus? Now a long time ago it dawned on me that if say you have the complex plane that every body knows and where the numbers are written as z = a + bi and it's ruled by i^2 = -1. 

Now if you replace the a and b from the most simple complex numbers there are by say A and B from the 3D complex number, you get 6D complex numbers. In my world this is known as the SLEDGEHAMMER THEOREM.

But why sledgehammer? Well on the day I found this for the first time there was a new song from Miley Cyrus out. It was named Wrecking Ball so while listening to her new song I arrived at the wisdom of naming this math result the sledgehammer theorem.  

So that is how this is related to a naked Miley sitting on her wrecking ball behind a matrix that shows you a simple example of the SLEDGEHAMMER THEOREM! 

What more do you want? Aren't these lovely matrix representations, what more do you want? May be it is a good time to split and let me try to upload this to what is know as the internet... Till updates & thanks for you attention. 

(14 June 2023) Today, actually 13 June, here it emerged in the news that our military intel service the MIVD had warned for an attack on the Nord Stream 2 pipelines done by a Ukrainian group...

It is no secret that originally my guestimate was the USA, but I have no proof for that and often it can also be something from crazyland. The problem I had with an Ukrainian group behind this is that this is the fastest way to loose all political and military help big time. Sometimes stuff comes from crazyland but it is hard to imagine a non-state actor being capable of doing a thing like the Nord Stream 2 attacks. 

I have a news link in the Dutch language for you:
VS waarschuwde Oekraïne Nord Stream niet te saboteren, na alarm van MIVD
Link used: https://nos.nl/artikel/2478770-vs-waarschuwde-oekraine-nord-stream-
niet-te-saboteren-na-alarm-van-mivd 

So that is a strange development. Lets go to the two items for this update: 

Item 1) Two pictures showing progress, what is more important?
Item 2) To accelerate or not, that is the question.

 Item 1) Two pictures showing progress, what is more important?

Slowly but surely the so called counter offensive is coming on steam. As such a few villages have been recaptured, here you see one of the many iconic pictures of this crazy war: 

Newsweek had a small update on progress so far:

Title: How Ukraine's Counteroffensive Is Faring So Far
By Brendan Cole On 6/12/23 at 7:56 AM EDT
Link used: https://www.newsweek.com/ukraine-counteroffensive-territorial-
gains-donetsk-1805898 

Well take care of yourself my dear UA soldiers!

Crazyland is everywhere, in the developments around donald trump the next weird storage space for classified documents was on what Americans name a bathroom. Here in Europe we name that a toilet or a wc. And if we take a bath we use a so called bathtub, it costs some more water but it is better as taking a bath in an American bathroom...:(

Anyway for years I have been stating that for the donald it is impossible to not commit crimes. He simply lacks all moral judgement to the extend I classified him a long time ago as mentally ill. The recent developments and how those documents were transferred from hin und her and back and forth confirm that donald is not one hundred percent normal. 

If donald gets prison time this could make it less likely he will become US prez again. If that happens again that would surely bring bad news to the Ukrainian equation. 

 Item 2) To accelerate or not, that is the question.

Anton Preskov had a new video out definitely worth your time. It is a subject that fascinates me because it is about electron transport in our galaxy. There are all kinds of filament like structures that transport electrons along the large magnetic fields in our milky way.

Well I think that electrons are not tiny magnets with two magnetic poles but every electron is a magnetic monopole. As such electrons get accelerated by magnetic field and of course if a stream of electrons bump into the wrong direction of such a huge magnetic field, they can also got slowed down.

If it was true that electrons have two magnetic poles, in that case any applied magnetic field would create two forces on those poles that cancel out. Well that doesn't happen. On top of that the weirdo's from physics say that electrons are point like particles and therefore as such it does not have a meaning to talk about the rotation of an electron.
So the two magnetic poles are crammed into a point but instead of being magnetically neutral the weirdo's claim it is a tiny magnet...

About four minutes into the video Anton tells about the large scale filaments and that there electrons are accelerated to almost the speed of light. And that is precisely what I have been thinking for years. Of course cosmology is a complicated thing but that high energy cosmic radiation could also pump up it's crazy high levels of energy by those huge galactic magnetic fields.
If true that means the giant kinetic energy in stuff we name cosmic rays is not always bound to it's origin like a supernova or so. But for that to be validated we need the net force as created by a magnetic field of say one Tesla on an electron.

Likely the physics community will not produce such results in this century. They are people who for example are capable of looking at a video of the behavior of plasma on the sun and say: We have never seen a magnetic monopole.

The stupidity is deep rooted, that's a fact.   

I had made a beautiful picture to click on and I remember the computer asking me to save changes and I clicked on "no" and now we have no beautiful picture. Yes don't worry I can be stupid to, I am still a human prone to stupidity without control.

Video 1:

Mysterious Filament Structures Stretching Toward Milky Way Black Hole
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3r6JjrgfdY  

So in the good video from Anton we observe electrons accelerated to almost the speed of light. In the second video, a bad and dumb video, we see the official line in the physics community. The video creator must be a stupid person because if all that crap was true, how do you explain the results of the famous Stern Gerlach experiment?

Video 2:

7 Differences between Electric and Magnetic Field
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkrFH3WCnkM

I think it is time to split, may I thank you for your attention. Till updates.

(09 June 2023) After a few days most people say or expect that Russia was indeed behind the breaching of the Kachovka dam. Like said before I am not a hydrodam engineer but a hydrodam is often many meters thick reinforced concrete. And there are three big holes in it, so that is likely not caused by the record level of water that was in the reservoir before the breaching.  

Two video's for today, both about UA so no electron spin stuff or so this time. 

Item 1) Sky news: You can't destroy the dam a second time.
Item 2) Vlad Vexler: Ukraine's Counter-Offensive Could Change the World.

  Item 1) Sky news: You can't destroy the dam a second time.

A military analyst on Sky news had the sobering opinion that you can't blow up the dam a second time and as such this is from the battlefield. What I find interesting is that if indeed the Russians did blow up the dam, likely this was done on command of Putin himself.  

Could it be that after the ICC arrest warrant he just doesn't give anymore and he starts embracing he is a war criminal? He just doesn't care anymore and will go doing more crazy and crazy things?  

If the order came from him that could explain why this was all done included flooding the own Russian frontlines at the south of the river. Only a person with not that high cognitive capabilities would give such a stupid order.

Just as the Kremlin completely miscalculated how the EU would react of the halting of Russian gas, they thought we would be dead by now eating our pets and starve slowly from hunger... They're not that smart over there. Even math professors are not that stupid as the average Kremlin dumbo.

The light blue colored parts are the flooded parts, as you see most is on the Russian side. Click on the picture for the video: 

Video title: Ukraine War: Has Russia 'blown the dam' on the Dnipro river too early?
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1SyRt-Nqfw

 Item 2) Vlad Vexler: Ukraine's Counter-Offensive Could Change the World.

I can't remember posting a video from Vlad Vexler before but he can tell it like it is. Sometimes he is a bit too wooly for me, I am more the hardcore science guy and not that philosophical.   

But Vlad's video contains a lot of stuff I never thought deeply about. Stuff like possible civil war inside Russia, yes that is possible but I am not seeking that. Yet the way Putin has shaped Russia in the last two decades makes that a very possible thing. 

I take it one week at a time, of course there are long term considerations like for example lately that F16 stuff. That is more the long term strategy kind of stuff. 

Anyway Vlad Vexler has a nice video, about 7  min long, upon this topic of ramifications coming from the so called counter offensive. Click on the picture for the video: 

Video title: Ukraine's Counter-Offensive Could Change the World
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JP1Btokmws0 

That was it for this update. Thanks for your attention.  

(07 June 2023) The sad news of the day was the breaching of the Kachovka dam and now about 80 settlements are in danger of over flooding. Both parties are accusing each other that they did it but it could also be sheer stupidity. Somewhere I read the water levels were much too high because the Russians didn't allow for getting rid of the excess water.
Well I am not a hydrodam engineer so I can´t comment on that. If it was done deliberately that looks very much like a serious war crime. It´s all very confusing, for example it seems that the Russians now no water have for that canal to Crimea and for them that should be very important... It could be we are now once more in a situation where stupidity kills much much more as evil can ever do...  

 Item 1) What about that fighting inside Russia?
 Item 2) After all these years finally some general theory.

 Item 1) What about that fighting inside Russia?

As an individual I don't care that much but more or less all weapon deliveries are done on the condition they are not used inside Russia. So that must be respected because that is what these countries want. The official goal is still helping UA help defend herself against the Russian invasion. 

But it is very efficient in sucking Russian military resources away from Ukraine, that is why I a bit hesitantly say I don´t care that much if Russians from Ukraine go inside their homecountry to fight those Kremlin assholes. 

In principle no of the weapons as delivered by NATO members can be used inside Russia. Stuff like thermal underwear or a good pair of military boots, I don't care as long as it ain´t weaponry.

Once Ukraine looses international support, it all will be even much harder as it is now. So that is a thing better avoided. 

On the other hand those Russians just want to fight the Kremlin so I feel a bit of sympathy for them. After all living under such a regime is often no fun at all and most of the time those autocrats are good at maintaining their political power but for the rest they are not that smart.  

Here is the sad picture of the day: 

Lets hope for the best but this is a huge amount of water... 

 Item 2) After all these years finally some general theory.

General theory about the complex multiplication in arbitrary dimensions? Didn't I say over the years I would not do that again because it is just so much better to fix a particular space, say three dimensional real space, and study from top to bottom and left to right.  

Over the dimensions those kind of spaces behave very differently, that is why you better not try to find stuff they have in common. But there are some things they have in common, for example if you dimension is an odd number so 1, 3, 5, etc, in that case you can never solve the equation z^2 = -1. 

In 2015 I only proved that for the three dimensional complex and circular numbers. Yet now I found a simple proof that covers all (odd) dimensions. It is so simple that it is worthy of publication. 

After all Gauss himself said on publications: "Seldom and ripe". With that he meant you should publish almost nothing at all and if you do do it seldom. Is 11 years seldom enough in the present age of publish or perish?  

Because my new post was so utterly simple from the math point of view, I included also a bit of four dimensional so called 'imitators of i'. They square to minus one and remark 4 is not a odd number.

If you click on the picture you will land at the new post:  

Title of the new post: Proof that Z^2 = -1 cannot be solved on real spaces with an odd dimension. (General theory part 1.) 

I don't know if I will write more so called 'general theory', may be I will may be I won't. 

That's it for this update. Thnks fr your ttntn & see yah.

(02 June 2023) Ok the NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg came out saying non of the members was against UA membership. For the present situation this does not change a tiny quantum but it gives some perspective for the long run...
Two items for today:  

Item 1) DW on how Germany can help the F16 coalition.
Item 2) A simple experiment that can (dis)prove the tiny magnet model for electrons.

 Item 1) DW on how Germany can help the F16 coalition.

Today Deutsche Welle had a video about how Germany can help the F16 coalition given the fact they don't have F16's anymore. A few days back I heard the Ukrainians shouting for Eurofighters in case of absence of F16 stuff. 

Of course that is a bad idea, there is such a large hinterland on maintenance and stuff that it costs far to much. Beside that there is a large international fleet of F16's so there is a large second hand market so to say. 

Ukraine is already some large patch blanket of all kinds of weapons, in the long run that is not good but it is what it is. 

Anyway one week back I just thought we were with five countries and now DW comes out with the next picture with flags: 

Video title: What can Germany contribute to the 'Fighter Jet Coalition'? | DW News
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xkb3QwjsxPM 

So it is going fast. Now I heard the US SecDef Lloyd Austin explaining how countries can best continue if they want to help. Well all those planes and training costs a lot of money so financial help is a good starter.
And likely what countries can contribute varies over the diverse countries. 

Now in this universe there are many deep mysteries. One of those mysteries is why the hell does the name Lloyd start with two l's? For years I have been wondering and only today I tried to answer this deep question that haunts humanity for centuries. I found that:

It is actually a Welsh spelling.

Welsh is a very different from English. It has some different spelling rules, and a number of sounds that just don’t exist in English.

The double-L digraph in Welsh is a voiceless alveolar lateral fricative.

So now you know it's a voiceless alveolar lateral fricative, what more do you want? Be glad it is not a shouting alveolar lateral fricative...

May be it's better to go to the next item.  

 Item 2) A simple experiment that can (dis)prove the tiny magnet model for electrons.

What is a very simple possible experiment to demonstrate if the physics professors are correct with their claim that electrons are tiny magnets? Well if they are tiny magnets all in all they are magnetically neutral just like say a neutron is neutral when it comes to electric charges.

So if you apply an electric field to a neutron, nothing happens in the sense the neutron does not feel a force from the electric field.  

Electrons are not magnetically neutral and the physics people explain that by that it is possible if the magnetic field has a gradient or changes in time, the electron feels a force.

So a very simple to write down experiment would be:

Create a large magnetic field as constant as possible everywhere.
Send a beam of electrons through it. Investigate if the electrons get accelerated in the direction of the magnetic field lines. That's all.

It sounds simple but in practice there is also Lorentz force and also a complicating factor: The magnetic field must be free of all electric fields. So it sounds simple but if you want to make such a thing in practice, that is a lot of work.

All in all it shouldn't be that expensive to prove or disprove the so called tiny magnet model for the electron.

__________

Can we look around in nature and try to find an ever cheaper experiment? Yes we can: the earth magnetic field. It is well known that the earth magnetic field acts as a shield against the solar wind.

That means somehow those particles get accelerated in the direction of the magnetic fieldlines from the earth magnetic field. And because electrons have so little mass, they hit so hard into the north and south pole of the earth, we have the famous aurora's.

The problem for the physics professors is that the earth magnetic field is already very weak so it cannot have much of a gradient everywhere. Ok, may be in the inner core of the earth but not out there in space.

But my dear physics profs, we can actually see the aurora's so why do the electrons have so much energy?    

This update is by far to long by this time so it is better to split and thanks for your attention. Till updates. 

(31 May 2023) Well well, Moscow got a small cookie of their own dough: The numbers vary but there could be a much as 30 drones trying to reach their targets. And about half of them got shot down. I have no idea who is behind this just like I had no clue when the Kremlin got that weird stuff some time ago.

May be Poland will also participate in the F16 coalition but I did not have the time to look it all up. So it could now be 6 instead of 5 participating nations. And contrary to tanks we (Dutchland) do seem to have unused F16's. About half of our F16's are not used. So we'll see where this all goes. 

Two items for today: 

Item 1) Deepfakes getting better: Joe Biden as a intergalactic spartan.
Item 2) What are crackpot theories? Dr. Angela Collier explains.

 Item 1) Deepfakes getting better: Joe Biden as a intergalactic spartan.

In a light touch we can look at the next fake picture from the USA prez Joe Biden: 

I did choose this picture because of the guy in the background. It is all done pretty good, it could have been a photo if it wasn't that absurd. A few more under this link: 

AI Deepfakes Just Got Better With This Upgrade
Link used: https://decrypt.co/139118/ai-deepfakes-just-got-better-
midjourney-upgrade  

 Item 2) What are crackpot theories? Dr. Angela Collier explains.

I had no idea what crackpot theories were so I clicked on the link to see the video. Oh it is about middle aged men who have never worked at a university and now have the time to do 'research' and confront the hard working professors with the fruits of their labor.

When back in time I was a student they did the same: They cited quotes from letters that were send by the public to the universities. I did not know it was still a thing today. 

Looking at the video I realized that I too fit the criteria, after all I am middle aged and my crackpot theory is that electrons are magnetic monopoles because that doesn't lead to all these contradictions you have otherwise.  

But my dear Angela, I do not fit the profile on other details. I would never email university workers. That is not a form of efficient communication, I would never do that. Furthermore years ago I lost my frustration just like at some point in time I was just no longer interested in communicating with the math profs. If the want to be good at saying they just can't find 3D complex numbers, well be my guest is that is what you want.  

Anyway I think that the 'tiny magnet' model for the magnetic properties of the electron has all the properties of a crackpot theory like Angela Collier more or less defines it. (Lack of the correct math and the absence of experimental proof of the tiny magnet model.)

The video is about 25 minutes long so if you are a Tiktokker and you make it till the end your brain is still more or less functional. Anyway click on the picture for the video and below that I try to explain one of the many problems with that tiny model for electron magnetism. Lets go:

Lets do a simple gedanken experiment and we follow the official theory about the behavior of electrons (as tiny magnets) when we apply a magnetic field.

The official theory says that either two things will happen:

1) About half of the electrons will align themselves with the applied magnetic field, this is the lowest energy state and the behavior is the same as say bar magnets where alignment also leads to the lowest potential energy.

2) The other half of the electrons will anti align themselves with the applied magnetic field. As such they raise their potential energy because it costs energy to do this perfect anti alignment.

Of course this anti align energy problem is never explained. How the hell can electrons raise their potential energy? Beside that how is it possible this anti alignment with the applied magnetic field is stable? Where is the fucking math Dr. Angela?

__________

As usual we must take things into perspective: There is no direct economical damage from the misunderstandings around electron spin. But a lot of money is wasted if my insights reign supreme, a lot of investments into say quantum computing and also nuclear fusion is just wasted money because it will never work.

Lets leave it with that, university people and their superiority complexes, they will not change in a thousand years of time. Till updates. 

(26 May 2023) I didn't had much time to flea through the news so this update is a lazy one where I just grab some old math from the year 2015. So lets go: 

 Item 1) The 'airpower coalition' for helping Ukraine getting F16's.
 Item 2) Six dimensional complex number, matrix representation and conjugate.

 Item 1) The 'airpower coalition' for helping Ukraine getting F16's.

Beside my home country there is some form of airpower coalition and the other nations are: The UK, Belgium, Denmark and Portugal. It is a bit ironic that I too support this expanse of air power, but it's ok because if Russia is your neighbor you must have serious weaponry to combat them when they go crazy once more.
Today I saw a video where it was questioned why the new JDAM's fail so often, they said that Russia still had good GPS jamming capabilities and I had something like "Here we go again".
But it is what it is and there are many reasons as why UA could benefit from the increase in air power.  

This evening on some Dutch website I was rumored that the UA offensive has started. Hard to say if that is actually so, ok ok there was plenty of news lately but that is almost always so because hey there is a war going on... 

It's getting late so I go to the next item. 

 Item 2) Six dimensional complex number, matrix representation and conjugate.

Yesterday I was a bit bored and decided to take a look at the bing search engine from Microsoft when it comes to my 3D complex numbers. For years now if you look at the images from a bing serach my pictures from the other website but also this website were giga dominant. It was easily 50% of all pictures showed, of course if you scroll down you get more and more less relevant results but I was always rather dominant on that small detail. 

Now we have ChatGPT and all that building in of artificial intelligence into search engines, luckily there are still plenty of images in a bing search result. It is remarkable that over the years a company like Microsoft have given me much more help in promoting the 3D complex numbers compared to any university of academy.  

Anyway I came across that nice picture with a six in it, it was clearly something I had made myself but what was in it I didn't remember. So I clicked on the picture so I could read it. It was from Dec in the year 2015 so I had just started the other website.

At the time I was still much more naive, I just thought that if you publish some good math like new complex exponentials that in the end the university people would pick it up. It never happened, like an old worn out vinyl record they keep on turning the stuff of the complex plane and at best the quaternions. 

Well it is what it is and when back in the year 2015 I posted the 6D complex numbers telling that a structure like this contains both the complex plane and the 3D complex numbers, nothing happens. 

Yes stuff like higher dimensional complex number break down via the famous prime number theorem that says any integer number has a unique factorization in prime numbers.  

But why talk about the behavior of acts of the university math professors? That is wasted time and energy almost by definition. 

Ok you math professor shitholes: As you see on inspection this way of crafting a conjugate is not that simple as only replacing the + sign in a - sign. In my life I have never seen a math professor capable of going out of that simple dumb 'change a + into - and vice versa'. The only exception was Roger Penrose and that was very refreshing to see. Roger spoke words like "Taking the complex conjugate while swapping these two things".

But as always life has it's shortcomings and Roger was talking about that spinor stuff where they think that there is a double cover for a description of the state of the electron. That means Roger too thinks that the electron is a tiny magnet so the only person that is capable of a conjugate is also a lunatic.

Where is the fucking proof that electrons have a double cover?  

Let me end this update so thanks for giving me a miracle: You have read it till the end of this update while you did NOT VOMIT looking at my conjugate and you did not ROLL YOUR EYES when I mentioned those electrons again. Till updates. 

(24 May 2023) Man oh man the war seems to be heating up a bit, is it only getting more uncontrollable? Let's hope from not. There was much to much news because the developments go swift and fast. Let us dive in the two items for today: 

Item 1) F16's, Belgarod & more mysterious BOJO UA Chicken!
Item 2) More on Microsoft's future fusion energy applier Helion. 

Only five days ago I thought the whole idea of F16's to Ukraine was shot out of the sky but in a strange but good twist the US government changed her stance on this detail of the war. So that is a big thanks on my behalf.
One of the concerns of the USA was possible unwanted techno transfer in case the Russians could lay there hands on a wrecked F16 or so. It seems that the first pilots are already in training so they don't let grow much grass over it. Of course these F16's won't change the situation right now but we must also look and think about the possible situation over say a year or two. After all there must be a good standing army after this all is over. 

The surprise news of the day were those raids on Russian soil in particular in the Belgorad environment.  I don't think this helps a lot although for the Russians this is of course a major distraction. But it has the potential to erode support from NATO nations in case the arms deliveries they make end up inside Russia.
On the other hand the UA government stated that all of the equipment those two groups had is stuff you can buy at a military dump. That is a bit tongue in cheek for the Putin remark from 2014 when he denied the Crimea was occupied by Russian military forces. Now those two groups are Russians with Russian passports and they resist the oppressive Kremlin regime. In this sense the Kremlin only gets what they have sown themselves, if you are a bunch of weird oppressors of course in your society you get forces that oppose that.
A problem is of course that these two groups of Russian resistance fighters take orders from no one. Lets hope this will not grow to the extend political support for Ukraine disappears; say for yourself the unity is amazingly large.

The last part of this item is by far the most important. I found one more picture of Boris Johnson and that famous Ukrainian chicken.  

I did not make much progress with my investigations if this important piece of pottery is from the UK national strategic reserve of tea pots. I even asked ChatGPT if she knew about that strategic tea pot reserve but she said she has never ever heard a question more stupid as mine. So my self esteem was seriously hurt, is it so strange to think the UK has a secret strategic reserve of tea pots?

Compared to what physics professors think of electron spin, that tea pot reserve idea is far far less crazy. And that brings us to the next item.   

 Item 2) More on Microsoft's future fusion energy applier Helion. 

In the last update I did forget a detail of how that fusion machine is supposed to work. It is called a Field Reversed Configuration and as far as I know it is just sending a lot of electrical current through the plasma.  

Now plasma is highly conductive, you can easily send electrical currents of thousands of Amperes through it. This is also done in those Tokamak fusion reactors like the ITER system under construction in France.

It is found that using an electrical current strongly stabilizes the plasma, but why is that? The overpaid weirdo's known as physics professors mumble a bit about Lorentz forces that confine quantum particles to the magnetic field lines but if you use only 2 or 3 brain cells you instantly know they are talking from their neck. 

An important feature of an electric current is that it produces a magnetic field. The closer you are to this current the stronger the magnetic field is. And if quantum particles like electrons and protons are not tiny magnets but in fact carry nett magnetic charge, in that case it is logical you will observe a stabilizing effect of such electrical currents in a plasma.  

So all these people that try to build fusion reactors to save the planet from climate change, at a basic level they do not understand why an electric current stabilizes plasma. They keep on thinking electrons are tiny magnets but if that were true why the heck would it stabilize plasma?

And I still don't get it why they themselves do not see it is weird to view the electron as a tiny magnets, where is your fucking experimental proof for this? It's nowhere and these idiots even do not view this as a problem...

Below you see a screen shot from a promotional video from Helion, the pink band is supposedly the electrical current through the plasma. How you make this in practice is 100% unknown but anyway it is a promotional video. 

I found another video from a guy that seems to know what he is talking about when it comes to nuclear fusion. He too thinks or believes that electrons are tiny magnets so that detail is likely wrong but for the rest he is pretty much ok. 

Video title: The problems with Helion Energy - a response to Real Engineering.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vUPhsFoniw 

That was it for this update, see you around.

(19 May 2023) There were plans to train Ukrainian pilots on F16's so that once training was done a few of those F16's could go to Ukraine. But the USA doesn't allow it, they say that the F16 is a weapon that Ukraine not needs right now.

Well that likely is the end of the pilot training for now. To be honest I can't validate if the US claim has some merits to it. But if the USA does not plan on sending F16 stuff to Ukraine, why withhold training? Or does the USA don't want any delivery of these planes to Ukraine at least for the foreseeable future? 

Lets wait and see what will happen. Two short items for today: 

Item 1) Three Russian scientists accused of treason.
Item 2) Microsoft and Helion sign a contract for fusion generated electricity.

 Item 1) Three Russian scientists accused of treason.

With the news of the shooting down of six Kinzhal missiles the news of the arrest of three scientists working on that weapon makes the mind fire if there is a relation between these.   

But no, these arrests were not done all three this week but over a longer period. Also it was cited there was some problem with the transfer of tech to China. Well that sounds familiar, but of course it is still Russia so often you can't trust what is reported. 

May be there was illegal transfer of knowledge but it is also claimed somebody got arrested for the publication in some Iranian scientific magazine. And on top of that the published article was screened for classified info. 

So I don't know what to think of this all.  

Business Insider has a nice alarming title on this subject: 

Title: 3 scientists behind Putin's 'unstoppable' missiles were jailed on charges of treason. Russian researchers say they are now living in fear.

Link used: https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-arrests-3-hypersonic-
missile-scientists-for-treason-2023-5?international=true&r=US&IR=T 

 Item 2) Microsoft and Helion sign a contract for fusion generated electricity.

Delivery in 2028, a contract of 50 megaWatt or so. And if not delivered Helion has to pay penalties... So it is serious, that is clear but will it work? 

The approach by Helion is very different from say a Tokamak but it also makes heavy use of magnetic fields. To be honest I have no idea how they want to compress the plasma and how to accelerate the plasma by magnetic fields.  

Of course they think that elementary particles like electrons are always tiny magnets and the same goes for protons while I think such particles are always magnetic monopoles. And such a monopole magnetic charge is permanent and not something that can be flipped. 

There are many ways to check that say electrons are not tiny magnets but magnetic monopoles. If you have an old television or may be an old oscilloscope with a tube, all you need is those strong modern neodymium magnets and observe there are electrons that are attracted and other repelled by your neodymium magnet.  

The Helion people seem to think that it is the Lorentz force that makes the plasma compress, may it will may be not. What I am still missing is how much force is generated on one electron by a magnetic field of one Tesla. Just like electrons feel a Coulomb force due to their electric charge.
I have no clue how the acceleration in the direction of the magnetic field is compared to that perpendicular Lorentz force stuff.  

In the upper part of the image you see a part of the latest approach as done by Helion. Click on the picture for a video 'explaining' how this all should work: 

Video title: Helion to supply Microsoft with fusion power by 2028, or pay penalties
Link used: https://newatlas.com/energy/helion-microsoft-fusion-2028/ 

It is completely unclear how this all is supposed to work: That pink colored plasma is made up of all kinds of particles, why would they be accelerated so uniform by magnetic fields? Don't forget an electrons is 1830 times less massive as a proton but they all stay nicely together?

This is not going to work, humans will keep on burning the fossil fuel thing and scientists will keep on believing forever that electrons are tiny magnets.

Let's leave it with that except for another link:

Helion to supply Microsoft with fusion power by 2028, or pay penalties
Link used: https://newatlas.com/energy/helion-microsoft-fusion-2028/ 

That was it for this update, lets all die together because of climate change while we keep on believing in the possibility of magnetic fusion. Till updates. 

(17 May 2023) Two items for today:

Item 1) All impending hypersonic missiles on Kyiv shot down?
Item 2) Short video on product integration.

 Item 1) All impending hypersonic missiles on Kyiv shot down?

Ukraine's capital Kyiv came under attack again but this time it was claimed that all of those hypersonic missiles were shot down. If correct this is good news in many ways. If I remember it correctly weren't these hyper sonic (up to 10 times the speed of sound) supposed to be the safe delivery system for nukes? 

These missiles go under the name Kinzhals and if all correct this is good news. It seems to be a Patriot system that has done the job. May be it had a good software update, hard to say why this is now a 100% success rate. 

Anyway I never wrote about it but I more or less hoped that with the deployment of so much anti air power systems, they would improve a bit more.
A screenshot from a video:

Anyway it is what it is, here is a Reuters report on this: 

Kyiv says it shoots down volley of Russian hypersonic missiles, the link is a bit too long to repost it but since it starts with www.reuters.com you can safely use it...;) 

__________ 

In another development when I saw this picture I just thought that the UK had opened their strategic reserve of teapots, in particular teapots in the shape of a chicken... 

Now a lot of people will say this is nonsense, there are no countries with strategic reserves of tea pots, but in the UK they have.  

But  these chickens seem to be some thing in Ukraine, I don't know the details but they survived a lot of things that got other chickens killed or damaged or so. 

I think we can safely conclude that Ukrainian chickens are very brave, likely much braver as Russian chickens. May be it is time to go to the next item: 

  Item 2) Short video on product integration.

May be you know what integration is in math, in it's simplest you can view it as the area under a graph. In itself it is a beautiful process, one day I wondered since integration is addition can you do the same with multiplication? 

A few months later I had a good idea and the whole problem was solved in a matter of a few minutes. The trick is to write it as a function to the power dx where with additive integration you must always multiply by dx like in f(x) dx. 

I think I found it in the year 1987 and although there are many results on product integration the notation with raising a function to the power dx is almost never used. In my view this raising to the dx is as basic as say Riemann sums, that is the way you should introduce it. 

There are a lot of cute results found inside the specialty of product integration. For example the identity function f(x) = x on the open interval (0, 1) has clearly an average value of one half. But that is the additive average, with product integration you can easily calculate that the multiplicative average equals 1/e where e of course denotes the Euler number 2.71828...

The video from today is from a good Youtube channel, I haven't seen much video's of him but likely he does a lot of rather complicated integrals. For myself speaking now I am old and still not wise, I only try to calculate complicated integrals if I need them for something else that I consider important.
Like calculating the log of an imaginary unit in say 3D complex numbers, if you express that problem in integrals wow that stuff is fxcking hard.   

Anyway if you consider it an interesting idea to do integration in a multiplicative manner, so not add everything but multiply it all, you can start at the next enthusiast video:

By the way, if I remember it correctly the product integral with the sine in it can also be used to show that the average value of the sine is one half. And I am talking about the multiplicative average.

Ok, let me leave this update with that, lets salute the chickens of Ukraine because they are true hero's and say till updates.

(12 May 2023) In Ukraine Bakmuht it seems the Ukrainians have gotten some ground back. Talk was about 3 km and it makes you wonder how long the Ruzzians have done to gain that original 30 km. It's now going on for months and months and it just crazy. 

Today I did not have much time so only two short items for today: 

Item 1) Storm Shadow: UK cruse missiles to UA. But what is their range?
Item 2) Short comment on a statement made by Zelensky. 

 Item 1) Storm Shadow: UK cruse missiles to UA. But what is their range? 

The UK seems to be upgrading a few hundred of these cruse missiles and as such it is the best of all worlds if these go to Ukraine. They are about 2 million a pop and have bunker busting capabilities.   

Yet the range of these is confusing. Media outlets like the BBC say 250 km while a wiki upon this weapon system says 560 km. It's also in use in France under the name SCALP-EG. So the Russians must not be afraid that NATO will deliver NATO weaponry to Ukraine; these Shadow Storm missiles are not in use in most NATO nations so why complain about that little insignificant detail?

Anyway a quote from the wiki:
The missile has a range of approximately 560 km (300 nmi; 350 mi),[9] and delivers a conventional BROACH warhead of 450 kilograms (990 lb). 
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storm_Shadow

But the BBC and other sources say it's a range of 250 km:
UK confirms supply of Storm Shadow long-range missiles in Ukraine
Link used: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-65558070 

So this is serious stuff and I hope the UA military can make good use of these...;) 

 Item 2) Short comment on a statement made by Zelensky. 

UA prez Zelensky remarked that the counter offensive has some time to wait because not all needed foreign military aid has arrived. And going to soon would only cost the lives of many while this is not needed.  

Well that is literally what I would write a few times but didn't. It's not good that everybody and everything is pulling and pushing at Ukraine as when does this counter offensive start?  

That is not very helpful, there is only one party that decides upon time strategy and tactics and guess what that are the Ukrainians themselves of course. 

Let me leave this update with that, till updates my dear reader. 

(10 May 2023) So the Russians had their victory day. The Putin speech was only 10 minutes this year and was the usual weird mix of weird stuff like the West has forgotten about nazism. This guy is really stupid without bottom; forgotten about nazism?  

So the next time I am in Germany and I see some old folks, why not ask them if they have may be ever heard of nazi's and or nazism. Will they look at me in bewilderment stating they have never ever heard of nazi's and they don't know what it is?

In the last week it was clear that the Russians have not forgotten about nazism because a hallmark of the fascist regime was the huge number of war crimes. And what does the Russian group Wagner do? Well use a lot of those phosphorous ammo was once more observed. Of course for Putin this is never a problem, yet stuff like this is a war crime. How would that shithole react when it would start raining the song of phosphor on their beloved Moscow?

The item for today was an interview with Geoffrey Hinton and I think it was a repost because it had the funny title "Reasons as why AI will kill us all". So lets go. 

Item 1) Geoffrey Hinton on "Reasons as why AI will kill us all"

 Item 1) Geoffrey Hinton on "Reasons as why AI will kill us all"

Now I don't want to scare anyone but I too am in the camp that thinks developments in AI go so fast that aren't we loosing control? Developments will not stop because the AI's can be very helpful, Geoffrey gave as an example a medical doctor who has not seen a few thousand patients but a few million. That could lead to much better medical diagnosis. 

Given the amount of data those AI's have access to, they don't have to be that smart to outsmart humans. They will be able to see all kinds of connections that most humans can't most of the time. 

And often when one human is smart for a short time, mostly it gets ignored if it involves some kind of learning curve. Knowledge in humans grows very slow, the standard example is my 3D complex numbers from the year 1990. I never observed anyone doing something with them and that in a timespan of 33 years. You can't say humans are fast movers or fast adapters.  

As Geoffrey remarked: If one AI has learned something, the others can do it too and can skip the learning process. So if one AI has learned something it simply updates all the others... We humans can't compete with a speed like that.

Video title: Geoffrey Hinton: Reasons why AI will kill us all
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oyegCeCcbA

If there ever comes a time when there are AI's that more  or less understand the importance of say the number tau in the next picture, is humanity doomed from that point? It could very well be, after if those AI's become smart why should they want to live with us humans? At best a few million humans are kept alive for maintenance of the machines the AI's are made of and that's it.  

May be I am much to gloom and doom here, but we must never forget that humans are not that smart at all. May be we are the dominant biological species over here but for an AI that is just like the most dominant species of ants out there in some forest. 

I too love computer power, for example it was important for me to calculate the above number tau with my own brains using pencil and paper. But of course I check that against computer apps that can calculate the logarithm of the number l.  

This l is the first imaginary unit of 4D complex numbers that are defined 
by the rule l^4 = -1. The importance of finding the logarithm is important so
you can use that for finding the four dimensional complex exponential.  

So from my point of view our human civilization has no shortage of dumb people. Once the future AI's understand that, why should they not kill us all? Or we get selectively breed just like we do with our cattle.

And again may be I am much to doomy & gloomy, after all biological life wants to survive and may be AI's are mostly happy to die as soon as possible. Or they just don't care if they get the command to erase themselves, but as soon as they want to survive we humans are dead meat.

If you want to learn a bit more in your human brain about the 4D complex exponential, here is an old post I wrote in 2018:    

Calculation of the four coordinate functions for the 4D exponential curve (complex version). 

That was it for this update. Don't get depressed by how stupid we are, after all our brains run on say 20 to 30 watt of energy consumption...  

(05 May 2023) You can't deny that a lot did happen in the last two days. So for a change let me turn the stuff into four items that will be as short as possible. Here we go: 

 Item 1) The adventures of the Russian ruble.
 Item 2) UA's Zerlensky visiting my country? Why?
 Item 3) Drone attack on the Kremlin, who did that?
 Item 4) EU unveils ammo production plan.
 Item 5) The empty item.

 Item 1) The adventures of the Russian ruble.

Only one week ago I posted a small picture with the value of the Russian ruble against the €. It was also a small test, would the exchange course of the ruble strengthen again after just a small post? 

Today I can say the answer is yes: 

Is the Kremlin a bit scared of a exchange rate of the ruble that is just very very weak? Who knows, but the fresh strength is amazing. In just seven days from over 90 back to 86,45 rubles per €... 

Since the ruble is not an active traded thing anymore it is hard to say how much foreign reserves this strengthening has cost them...;) 

 Item 2) UA's Zerlensky visiting my country? Why?

Yesterday it emerged that Zerlensky would come to my country. I wondered why and today it came out he was talking at the ICC. The International Criminal Court wants Putin because of the abduction of so many Ukrainian children. 

It's hard to say if there is a possibility that the Vlad will see his day in court in The Hague, but we also thought we would never get Milosowitz or whatever the exact spelling of the name of that war criminal was.  

Of course Zerlensky had more stuff to do, here he is doing all that talking stuff political figures have to do all the time: 

Life as a political leader is hard: Your job description is like you must always complain about other political figures and most of the time you can only use words. It is not you can throw in a bunch of equations and only say: Figure it our for yourself!

 Item 3) Drone attack on the Kremlin, who did that?

With the strike on the Nordstream pipelines it was not that hard to figure out what country had the highest probability to have done this. But this drone strike on the Kremlin has just to many possible culprits that for the time being I will not make an estimate. 

I would only like to remark that in case this is not a so called 'false flag' operation by the Russians, this drone attack shows it is possible to deliver a tactical nuke to the Kremlin. Ok ok you need a somehow bigger drone because nukes are more heavy as the one or two pounds of gun powder that exploded yesterday, but that raises spirits big time: Nuking the Kremlin with a tactical nuke via a cheap Chinese drone, what more do I want? And what about the delivery of very dangerous biological agents during the impending 09 May remembrance day in Moscow?

Here is a grainy screenshot of the explosion that weirdly enough was not shown on the famous Russian state television:

That Russian flag stuff at the bottom of the picture are the tribunes of the impending 09 May festivities celebrating the victory over the Nazi's back in 1945. 

I have no clue whatsoever, who did this?

On the other hand we must not blow this out of proportions, it would be funny if the Russian air defense forces are just to weak to defend against a tactical nuke via a cheap Chinese drone. The reality is that we are only looking at a traffic violation. See for yourself, there is a sign that says drones are forbidden on the Kremlin site and all we observe is just like a car riding through a red light where this is not allowed... 

Let's go to the next item:

 Item 4) EU unveils ammo production plan.

Ah that feels a bit better, the artillery ammo for Ukraine finally gets some boost. This is a difficult discussion, of course I too am in favor of production inside the EU but we also need speed and volume.

On top of that it is in the plans we also need to make that 152 mm diameter ammo. That's Russian ammo made in the EU to kill Russian soldiers in Ukraine. 

We can't say life is not weird, who ever thought we would go and produce such ammo? 

Here is a short video on the stuff: 

EU unveils ammo production plan as war in Ukraine rages • FRANCE 24 English
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vhzqjq5mvfY 

 Item 5) The empty item.

In the past a long long time ago when I posted not two items but a lot of them, I often named the fifth item the empty item. 

Just empty in order to get the brain empty. 

And if you brain is empty and free from emotion you don't need right now, you can start thinking on more creative ways to kill Russians. 

Let me end this update with that wisdom. Thanks for your enduring attention span if you made it to the end of this long long update. See you around! 

(03 May 2023) The godfather of AI research has quit his job at Google citing that lately things are handled in a far to dangerous manner. I think he is right, it is not that future AI systems are so very smart, it is more that people think of themselves as smart while on the scale of things it does not amount to much. Ok we humans are smarter as ants or like other monkey or ape species, but are we really that smart? 

I think it is now all unstoppable, the competition between the tech giants and the diverse countries is just too big. Everybody wants there to be first regardless what...

Two items for this update: 

Item 1) Lets ride, let the Ukrainian action start!
Item 2) Advertisement for the latest math post. 

 Item 1) Lets ride, let the Ukrainian action start!

For weeks there is that constant buzz of how and when the UA counter offensive starts. But is was far to wet, the ground must be dry enough for those heave machinery like tanks and infantry transport vehicles.  

Well I want to wish the Ukrainian military good luck with the impending actions. There is not much air support but a lot of tanks and stuff are now there in Ukraine ready to be used on the front. I hope the ammo shortage is not so serious it will cause a lot of hinder. 

Anyway a few days back it was reported that the UA military forces are "More Than Ready", so lets hope that is correct and once more: GOOD LUCK! 

What I found a bit annoying in the last weeks was that there was constantly this talk like "Ukraine has to prove they are worthy the weapon deliveries" and so on and so on. I would like to remark you don't have to prove anything to me.  

Come on these large operations are so complicated that you must wait a long time before a realistic chance of success is there. 

So lets hope for the best, don't get hurt, wounded or even killed my dear UA soldiers! 

 Item 2) Advertisement for the latest math post. 

Over at 3Dcomplexnumbers.net I took the time and explained in detail that when it comes to electricity, we always have that like electric charges have a repelling effect while opposite electric charges have an attractive effect.

This goes for all scales, from say macroscopic metal balls to the smallest molecule possible: opposites attract.   

I used that video from that nutjob Sir Richard Catlow once more because it shows the believe among chemistry and physics professors that in the electron pair the spins must be opposite. 

And if you like the nutjob chemistry & physics professors believe that electrons are tiny magnets, that logically means that in chemical bonds the electron pair bonding goes via north pole to north pole binding. (Or south to south pole.) The spins must be anti aligned and if the tiny magnet idea is true you are faced with binding via like magnetism. 

Of course on the quantum level of tiny electrons it was 7 or 8 years ago I figured out that they can't be 'tiny magnets'. I even started new html pages collecting dozens and dozens of reasons as why electrons can't be tiny magnets. 

Of course the arrogant overpaid physics professors did only one thing: nothing.  

So they are the same as math professors, it is not only stupid to the bone but it is also a coward to the bone. And now after all those years I am happy to say the people like Sir Richard Catlow are overpaid dumb nutjobs.  

If being polite for years and years does nothing, if being unpolite and a bit more truthful does nothing we can safely conclude the behavior is the same as the math professors.

These people are not serious scientists, if it is clear you are on the wrong track you must repair the stuff you do wrong. But math, physics or chemistry if you only have nutjobs like Sir Richard Catlow and the behavior they show, you can wait till the end of times and nothing will happen.

Electrons are not tiny magnets but magnetic monopoles, why is there no reaction?
Well there is no reaction because they are all nutjobs. 

That is why the impending AI is so dangerous, if humans behave like that (not repair what is wrong) there is not much hope left.  

I hope you don't get depressed by this, but humans are not that smart at all.

Well here is the link to the latest post:

Video ‘proof’ that all chemistry professors are nutjobs.
http://3dcomplexnumbers.net/2023/04/24/video-proof-that-all-chemistry-
professors-are-nutjobs/  

So that was the update for 03 May: I wish the Ukrainians good luck with the impending work they have to do while at the same time I expect the physics and chemistry professors keep on being total nutjobs without any hope of improvement.

See you in a new update. 

(28 April 2023) It was kingsday over here, kingsday is a national festivity day in my country and in a student city where I live this is always a lot of beer in a lot of students. I myself don't like drinking during daytime, no I like a pint of beer before I go to sleep and daytime drinking was something we did as teens a long long time ago.  

Two items for today: 

Item 1) The Russian ruble versus the EU€, without much comment.
Item 2) Electrons that anti-align; are the physics professors so crazy? Yep they are!

 Item 1) The Russian ruble versus the EU€, without much comment.

Right after the start of the war the Russian ruble declined in value fast, if memory serves it stood at about 140 ruble/€ when I made a few comments about it. 

May be I should have kept my mouth because it could have focused the minds of the Kremlin occupants and they started to defend the value of the ruble big time. With an amazing speed the ruble gained a lot of strength until it was in the range of 50 to 55 rubles a €. 

Since that time, about six months ago, it looks like the Russians gave up on defending the value of the ruble. After all it costs a lot of foreign reserves and every time the strengthening is only temporary.  

A complicating factor in understanding what is actually going on is the fact that the ruble is no longer an active traded currency, so from that point of view it should not be that expensive to defend it's value. 

My excuses for the difficult to read detail in the next picture, my website format does not allow for picture wider than 450 pixels. But if you click on the picture you get a more readable and wider version of it:

Another detail of interest is that the Kremlin now receives much more rubles for a barrel of oil, six month ago every oil dollar gave 55 rubles and now it is about 90 rubles.  

Lets leave the adventures of the Russian ruble with that. 

 Item 2) Electrons that anti-align; are the physics professors so crazy? Yep they are!

Last week I showed you that video about using computer models in chemistry. That lecture was given by some nutjob under the name sir Richard Catlow and he came up with that weird detail that chemistry professors think that electron bonds go via say north pole to north pole binding. Or may be magnetic south pole to south pole binding. 

That is just one example if you hang on to the Gauss law for magnetism just forever. If you think magnetic monopoles do not exist you must accept that in chemical bonds the electrons spins are anti-aligned and as such it must be north pole to north pole binding or the south pole version of that nonsense.

Anyway I want that stupid insight in my homepage to so here is a snap shot where this weirdo sir Richard Catlow shows a simulation where indeed we observe a computer model that tries to bind the stuff via equal magnetic poles: 

I guess it is about 8 years ago that I figured out that electrons are not tiny magnets but they themselves are the magnetic monopoles that physics professors seek for so long without any success.

In this world we will never run out of idiots, how can you not find this result for one hundred years of time since the Stern-Gerlach experiment? Why are physics and chemistry professors so utterly stupid when it comes to this Gauss law for magnetism? I just don't know.

Let us look at electric charges, in particular an electric dipole. If there are no external electric fields as in the upper half of the picture below, there are no external forces on the two electric charges -q and +q: 

What ALWAYS happens is that the electric charge -q will feel an upward force and the +q charge will feel a downwards pointing force. If this electric dipole can move freely because of the forces it feels it will ALWAYS align itself with the applied electric field.

As such life is logical, equal electric charges repel.

But for magnetism the weirdo's of the physics professors have it as accepted knowledge that if a magnetic field is applied to a bunch of electrons, half of the electrons will align with that magnetic field and the other half will anti-align themselves...

They never explain how this works in detail because say for yourself, it will never work in detail in case the electron is a magnetic dipole as the idiots believe.

Only if electrons are not magnetic dipoles at all but magnetic monopoles, this all is suddenly utterly logical.

But professors are professors and they don't want logic to prevail but they want prizes like the Nobel prize in physics. They are not 'truth seekers' but only 'prize seekers' and in my view these are not scientists.

Not that I am a scientist much myself, after all I am a human and just like the average chimpanzee is not a scientist how can I every be one? But I like truth seeking much more as that stupid Nobel prize seeking behavior we see in what should be the scientific community.

I think it is time to close this update so thanks for your attention if you made it all until this end of this update.    

(26 April 2023) Only one item for today:  

Item 1) Get the production of 155 mm shells rolling; why is it so difficult? 

 Item 1) Get the production of 155 mm shells rolling; why is it so difficult?

It was already a few weeks ago that I reported for the first time on that plan to get for about one billion € of 155 ammo shells to Ukraine. But there are still problems to the extend that there are even news articles asking stuff like: Will be Ukraine offensive be stalled by the lack of artillery ammo? 

There are political problems and may be production problems. The production problems are easy to understand: it seems some parts produced in Asia are used in the production of 155 mm ammo shells. If such Asian countries just don't want their parts ending up on a battlefield, these parts cannot be used and we must procure them elsewhere or make it ourselves. 

And a bit of political differences: Countries like France, Cyprus and Greece push for production exclusively inside the EU. Well I am in favor of that too but other countries like my own home country say it is not realistic to try and do that because we lack production capacity anyway. I have no insight in the present European production capacity, but if it is true I also agree with that. 

Given the scale of this ammo order (only one billion €) I think it is better if the delivery goes fast, Ukraine needs about 20 to 25 thousand 155 mm shells a day in case of a serious offensive on their behalf. So I don't care that much if we buy some shells from outside the EU. Military budgets are finally expanding and of course it is important if that money can be spend inside the EU economy. And please we must NEVER forget the goal is not to spend money but the goal is having more military power or capabilities if you want.

Well lets hope and pray our political leaders can find a way out, I have no insight into the actual potential of the EU defense industry to start production fast so all I can do is pray like a Russian soldier prays for more vodka. 

Two sources where the stuff is discussed: 

Are delayed EU ammunition deliveries undermining Ukraine's advancement efforts? | DW News Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHowygcj3HY

EU plan to provide artillery shells to Ukraine hits legal snag • FRANCE 24 English
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdqaKeio0bQ 

Well lets hope for the best while preparing for the worst possible outcome is not very much advised. But when it comes to military stuff it is always very possible that Europe just can't deliver. That is caused by stuff known as 'peace dividends'. 

End of this update. See you around & thanks for your attention. 

(21 April 2023) Two items for the update of this day 21 April 2023: 

Item 1) NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg visits Ukraine.
Item 2) Those good old Cauchy-Riemann equations from 1990.

 Item 1) NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg visits Ukraine.

Jens visited Kyiv and somehow it emerged that he has said "Ukraine belongs in NATO". Weirdly enough the Kremlin came out that it would be very dangerous for Russia if the UA would join NATO. 

Pardon me? What country gave security guarantees to Ukraine if they would give up their nuclear arsenal back in the 1990-ties? Yes that was Russia itself, well how have those security guarantees evolved over the last three decades?

Well Russia couldn't get enough of invading Ukraine commit all kinds of war crimes. Just today it emerged that Wagner forces deliberately killed children and teenagers for no reason at all and the stupid Kremlin folks even think we will listen to their fucking stupid complaints?  

It will take some time before the UA can join NATO but as we lately saw with Finland it can go fast if the conditions are ripe. You cannot compare that the Ukraine becoming a member of the European Union, that is such a mountain of work it could easily last over one decade and even that would be fast.  

The weirdo's at the Kremlin often have stated that Ukraine is run by nazi's, to be precise it were homosexual Jewish nazi's. Just like there were supposedly biolabs for crafting biological weaponry against the holy and pure Russians... 

Well I too would be very worried if my country was run by leather faggots worshiping  the Jewish religion and having a political ideology that favors strong leadership like the nazi's did.

Medvedev looks so good in his faggot nazi leather jacket, hey Medvedev sold some gas to the EU lately?

 Item 2) Those good old Cauchy-Riemann equations from 1990.

Every week I have a new excuse to post some of these new midjourney images, this time it is some robot stuff that looks great combined with those old so called Cauchy-Riemann equations.

The Cauchy-Riemann equations are rather important inside math; it is stuff like that that ensures we can do complex analysis on the complex plane. So if someone would find the three dimensional analogue of this, that would be some significant finding you would think.

Now 33 years later I am much wiser about how knowledge and science grows: These math, physics and chemistry professors are mostly ego and not much substance. Math professors keep on telling decade in decade out they can't find 3D complex numbers. Physics professors have their weird stuff with electron spin, they are too stupid to see for themselves it all does not add up and what do they do? They keep on telling that they can't find the magnetic monopoles.

And chemistry professors, why are they so fucking stupid to believe that in the electron pair the binding goes via north pole to north pole or the same with a magnetic south pole to a south pole? Why do chemistry professors never ever challenge the crap as told by physics professors? 

In my view if you want to find significant results you better skip all that crap. Why should you take on a career inside the universities and academia if that only leads to garbage results?  

If as a math professor you can't speak about 3D complex numbers, why should you have some right to tax payer money?

If as a physics professor you can't speak about the weirdness of electrons being tiny magnets, why do you expect all that tax payer money to flow towards you?

If as a chemistry professor you explain molecular bonds via anti alignment of two electrons when it comes to the electron spin, why do you waste all that tax payer money decade in decade out?

Of course I will never get an answer and ok ok may be it is not a good idea to cut over 50% of the budget of universities. That has a lot of long term damage too, but why is everybody always so fucking stupid? I just don't know.

End of this update, see you next week or so.  

(19 April 2023) Just two items: 

Item 1) A ban on Ukrainian grain exports?
Item 2) A chemical nutjob on computer modeling molecular stuff. 

 Item 1) A ban on Ukrainian grain exports?

It seems like the grain exports from Ukraine have done their important work: driving down prices so that people who live on 2 € a day still live on 2 € a day. So widespread famine was prevented.  

Now back in the time this was the goal of course but soon after the grain exports from Ukraine resumed again there was all that talk that a lot of grain ended up in Europe and did not went to the poorest nations. I had little means to verify that all in detail and it did not matter much: If it ended up in Europe it still had a lowering effect on global grain prices. If there would be large shortages in Europe, our big wallets would drive up global grain prices big time and that would spell horror for the poor of this world. 

But now the opposite has happened; the exports over land from Ukraine have clogged up the local markets and grain prices seemed to nosedive. As such countries like Poland and Hungary have declared a ban on UA grain imports. 

In the EU this is a hot topic because agriculture policy is purely done by the EU and not by the individual member states. Yet I feel sympathy for say the East European farmers, the goal was preventing famine and now there are a lot of farmers that have trouble because there are all these bottlenecks. 

I have no idea what is best right now, after all soon Russia could decide not to cooperate any longer with the grain deal and than everything will be different again.  

You know I am all 100% in favor of helping Ukraine economically but if that help gives direct economical damage to farmers we must find a way out. May be temporary quota's or whatever what. I am not an agriculture expert but we can't let go farmers belly up in the name of helping Ukraine. Further reading:

'Not possible' to ban Ukraine grain, EU tells Poland, Hungary
Link used: https://euobserver.com/ukraine/156926 

 Item 2) A chemical nutjob on computer modeling molecular stuff. 

Our nutjob in the update is sir Richard Catlow who gave an hour long lecture at the Royal Institution upon the fine art of computer models for chemistry. One of the first models he shows is the Ptolemaic model from a time when it was generally thought the earth was the midpoint of the solar system. And indeed it looks very complicated compared to what we think at present day: the sun is the center of the solar system:

Of course in the middle ages they did not have any observational proof at all that the earth was the center of the solar system. Just like our nutjob today has no proof at all that electrons are 'tiny magnets'. 

Lets do a thought experiment:

Take a piece of paper and write the gravity potential energy on it, that is E = mgh where m is the mass, g is the earth gravitational constant and h is the vertical displacement.
Now you go outside and sit in a carton box looking at your piece of paper.
You are sitting in your box and now you want to fly, how do you do that?
Very simple: You put a minus sign before the potential energy and all of a sudden instead of falling down you now fly up. Really true...  

End of the thought experiment.

But in physics and chemistry they do stuff like that. You can look it up for yourself on the internet, search for the Hamiltonian of two magnets and compare that of the Hamiltonian of the electron pair.

In these Hamiltonians you always see the inner product of two vectors that represent the magnetic moments. Now if you have two magnets in your hands and you combine them north pole to south pole that is called alignment of the magnets. And that is the lowest energy state because it costs energy to remove the magnets.

If two vectors point in the same direction like in the aligned magnetic moments, the inner product is always positive. Therefore they add a minus sign to it so that it is ensured this is the lowest possible energy state.

But the physics and chemistry nutjobs of this world know that say in the electron pair the electrons must have opposite spins, so they must be anti aligned. As such the inner product already gives a negative result and no minus sign is needed. So for electrons systems Hamiltonians like this do not have minus signs in them.

Do you see the level of 'nutjob' we observe here? But just like the people from the medieval times simply hold on to their belief that the earth was the center of the univers, fake scientists like sir Richard Catlow keep on holding on to their belief that it must be that electrons are tiny magnets.

Often I have joked that these dumb people, that is people like sir Richard Catlow believe that in chemical bonding the electrons attach via a north north pole binding or a south pole against south pole binding. Now I have video proof for that: Just look at 30 minutes into the video where you see an animation of a molecule forming where all connections are 'red against red'. And red often stands for the magnetic north pole, so out nutjob sir Richard Catlow shows he believes this kind of nonsense.

So often I have wondered as why the physics and chemistry professors themselves do not see their ideas about electron spin are just wrong: electrons are magnetic monopoles and that explains why in the electron pair the spins must be opposite.

Because year in year out the physics and chemistry professors keep on hanging to their stupid idea that no matter what no magnetic monopoles exist, this gives rise to their belief that chemical bonds  via electron pairs must be that crazy.

Yet the electron pairs are not crazy, what is crazy are the physics and chemistry professors like our nutjob of this update: sir Richard Catlow. 

But dumb stupid and crazy or not, the nutjob Richard Catlow does also have a beautiful thing to show to his audience. It is the very first model of a methane molecule. Remark this is from long before the discovery of the electron and ok ok methane is not a flat molecule but more like a tiny pyramid. But it is amazing that without knowledge of the electrons this model was made.

Just like it is amazing that dumb people like sir Richard Catlow can brag about his Nature publications, receiving a fat salary all of his life and be as stupid as he is with the average thinking on electron spin... Click on the picture to see the one hour long video: 

Video title: Computer modelling for molecular science – with Sir Richard Catlow 
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eUHGs7dPBI

May be it is better to end this update, people like our daily nutjob will never change. So lets call a man a man, a horse a horse and a nutjob a nutjob and not try to be polite for no reason at all. Til updates.  

(14 April 2023) Today (or better yesterday) in the USA the guy that leaked those classified docs was arrested. Some 21 year old working in the National Guard, that is how reserves are named over there.

It was nice to see a few Ukrainian officials before the arrest news definitely claiming it was done by the Russians. Of course some documents were altered by pro Russian people but that does not prove the documents were hacked by team Russia. But I can understand it: For Ukrainians the Russians are the root of all evil while I know it is the math professors that are the root of all evil in this world. Have you never been tortured by their evil slaves the math teachers?

But serious the most damaging thing is of course a lack of trust in sharing sensitive information. The Ukrainians must make up their own mind about this, but all in all this leaking stuff looks like some one person thing. So lets hope not all trust is gone...

Two items for today.  

Item 1) Holes in the earth magnetosphere, solar wind is the cause?
Item 2) Advertisement latest math post.

 Item 1) Holes in the earth magnetosphere, solar wind is the cause?

About a month ago during a solar storm even in my country the Aurora Borealis was visible. And it was in the news that there was a large hole in the earth magnetosphere. NASA has a strong clue that electrons have something to do with it. 

It is interesting that electrons (and in much lesser extend protons) get accelerated so much by the earth magnetic field that they are able to ionize neutral atoms and molecules in our atmosphere. 

The official theory is that electrons are tiny magnets, but if so why do they slam in so hard on the north and south pole? If electrons are point like particles and also tiny bipolar magnets, how do they get accelerated by the earth magnetic field? Why would our magnetic field act as a shield against the solar wind? 

It is completely unexplainable of course with that stupid idea that all things in the universe must be magnetic dipoles. This is one more example where the electron viewed as a magnetic monopole makes much more sense. It instantly explains as why the earth magnetic field acts as a shield.

If there is some solar storm going on the electrons with the highest speed and as such kinetic energy are the ones that get repelled by the local solar magnetic field like it emerges from sun spots. That causes outbursts of electron clouds with mostly all the same magnetic charge. Suppose we have such a fast moving cloud of plasma and it contains mostly south charged electrons, what happens if that slams into the north pole? Well it suppresses the local earth magnetic field hence we observe a 'hole' in the earth magnetic field. It's not a hole but the earth north pole is temporary suppressed by all that magnetic charge.   

Anyway if I would not have discontinued my long list of reasons as why electrons must me magnetic monopoles, the next video would be something like reason number 110 or so.  

According to NASA this process of opening holes in the earth magnetosphere happens dozens of times a day. Of course there are likely additional reasons as why these holes open up but in my view those concentrated magnetic monopoles are a good explanation and brings a bit of deeper understanding at the scene.

Physics professors would say that the solar wind is made of spin selected particles, so it contains more spin up as spin down particles or vice versa.

Click on the pic for the NASA video: 

It is a pity that physics professors are so stupid when it comes to something that should not be that difficult: After 125 years finally give some proof for their shit that electrons are tiny magnets.

But sometimes they come in funny: years ago I more or less expected that solar wind and solar storms behave this way. The video is from the year 2014.  

Video title: Hidden Magnetic Portals Around Earth
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaB4cSPWBN0 

It's getting late so we go to the next item. 

 Item 2) Advertisement latest math post.

In the latest math post I just wondered what would happen if you take the process to taking the adjoint twice. It was a bit unhandy I named that stuff taking the conjugate 'determinant style' but over the years and decades I had forgotten there was already a name for it: The adjoint matrix.

Now these adjoint matrices are strongly coupled to how you calculate the inverse of a square matrix and even the math professors know that if you invert a matrix twice you are back to where you started from.

So what does repeated taking the adjoint do?  

The above calculation if for a so called 3D circular number, but if you don't know that stuff you can take any 3x3 matrix with real numbers. The double adjoint says that a 3x3 matrix picks up an extra factor of it's own determinant.

So life's good and there is no reason at all to commit suicide because there is plenty of beautiful math. Here is the link to the other website:

What is the repeated conjugate ‘determinant style’? (Also: Repeated adjoint matrix.)
Link used: http://3dcomplexnumbers.net/2023/04/12/what-is-the-repeated-conjugate-
determinant-style-also-repeated-adjoint-matrix/  

That was it because time is running out, thanks for your attention and see you again. 

(12 April 2023) No intro for today and just two items to upload: 

Item 1) These are crazy security leaks "Hey man wanna see some leaked docs?"
Item 2) Ben Miles on possibly better solar cells. 

 Item 1) These are crazy security leaks "Hey man wanna see some leaked docs?"

At first I did not pay much attention to it, some documents were leaked so what? It happens all the time. But now some time later it seems to be going about hundreds of them. And that while it is completely unknown if there are more batches coming. 

The channel combat veteran reacts has a video about it and how these leaks emerged is indeed just totally crazy. Two guys in a Discord gameroom talking about Minecraft and the war in Ukraine. They run into some argument and one of them: "Hey man do you want to see some leaked documents?"  

The Guardian has an article about the stuff, Title & link: 

Pentagon leak traced to video game chat group users arguing over war in Ukraine
Link used: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/apr/11/pentagon-leak-traced- 
to-video-game-chat-group-users-arguing-over-war-in-ukraine 

On the one hand this is rather funny although the average Pentagon employee likely voices a very different opinion about these leaks. On the other hand lets hope this does not hinder the Ukrainian effort. After all it is not very helpful if the Russians know the UA stockpiles of say anti air ammo.  

 Item 2) Ben Miles on possibly better solar cells. 

In the UK some good scientists have been done a lot of work to get better solar cells. And the improvement could be huge: about 250% or say a factor of 2.5 better. Ben Miles has worked with these materials himself and is capable of talking some sense into how this all works.

Normally spoken silicon based solar cells transform about one fifth of the every from the sun into electricity. If that can be jacket up to 2.5 times as much that would really be good news. 

Video title: Solar 4.0: Ultra Efficient Solar Panel Breakthrough. Click on the picture if you want to see the video or cut & paste the link below the picture: 

Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtOSAOaAmUM

In another development I am almost ready with a new math post on the stuff known as adjoint matrices. It was a bit unhandy that I named them Conjugates 'determinant style' but to my excuse I can say that even the Latex typesetting program for math texts does not recognize the word 'adjoint'.

Now this adjoint plays an important role in finding the inverse of a square matrix. And what happens if you take the inverse twice? Well you get back to where you started from. It is just as simple as say the inverse of 5 is 1/5 and the inverse of 1/5 gets you back to 5.

So I wondered what the double adjoint matrix would be because that is not 100% clear at first sight. I did that for 3D circular numbers so you can view the easy result below as emerging from 3x3 matrices. The result is that doing the process of calculating the adjoint twice, so you repeat the process, you get an extra factor of the determinant.

That's all not very surprising and it is clearly not new math, but why should I always go for the math no other human has thought about? Sometimes I too like it a bit more down to earth.

Anyway you can check the math for yourself and I placed it on the background of one of those Midjourney AI pictures that are flooding the internet lately:

And I just wonder, if some artificial intelligence can make stuff that looks like art, is it in the future possible it makes original math? Who knows? I don't know, after all what is 'original math'?  

But it is time to find and hit that button known as 'publish website' so may I thank you for your attention and with you a good cognition so you are better equipped to get more Russian soldiers killed. Till updates. 

(07 April 2023) Trump is arrested? No I am not mentally ill, it is still donald trump without the capital letters but if a sentence starts this is always marked with a capital letter. Anyway for the war this might be a strategic advantage. I don't want to interfere deeply with US politics but one observation is clear: If that weirdo becomes US prez again that likely spells not much good for Ukraine...  

During trump's presidency I always had the impression it was impossible for him not to commit crimes. That is, in my view anyway, his mental illness. He has now over 30 counts hanging from his ass, I wonder how much more he will be accused of. 

Two items for this update: 

Item 1) Very short UA stuff.
Item 2) Very short math stuff with the last selfie on earth.

 Item 1) Very short UA stuff.

Lately I told you there were plans to ramp up European production of ammo shells for our own stockpiles and for helping Ukraine. The allocation of money over the countries is not the problem but there seems to be some infighting about where the production would take place. Plans were to keep production inside Europe, other countries want to prevent that Turkey get a share of the ammo production and other nations say we should buy international.

Well I don't care that much although I have a slight preference for production inside the EU. In my view we should also allow Turkey for some share of shell production, I understand the sensitivities related to the local history over there. But facts are that overall Turkey has been very helpful when it comes to the war in Ukraine, so that is why I think they also have some right of a production share.

So I don't know, let's hope production can start soon... 

__________ 

In another development I found that old photo back from before the invasion of Crimea and the MH17 downing. It makes me wonder again as why at the Kremlin they think it is fun to make some war.  

Those were the times I guess. Likely we won't see such photo's anytime soon, on the international level this Putin guy is more or less written off something in the order of 100%... 

 Item 2) Very short math stuff with the last selfie on earth.

I have almost finished a fresh math post about taking the double adjoint matrix. All square matrices have these so called adjoint matrices and may be you enjoyed classes in linear algebra. Well the adjoint matrix was the one you need to find the inverse of a square matrix.   

Now in the previous math post I showed people who like perverted stuff like that that this process of taking the adjoint gives rise to a weird looking transport of 3D numbers that do not have an inverse. If they have one eigenvalue zero, the process of taking the adjoint gives them an extra zero eigenvalue.

And if these 3D numbers already have two eigenvalues zero, taking the adjoint makes it three eigenvalues zero and the only number that can do that is the number zero itself. 

Anyway inside my space of 3D numbers it is easy to prove that if you take a repeated adjoint process, you end up with the zero operator. But how does this go for say square matrices with entries that are all real numbers? It goes the same for all square matrices, if a particular matrix is not invertible taking the second adjoint always gives the zero matrix.

In math there are not many processes that if you repeat them they give zero results. For example the boundary of the boundary is always zero, that is an idea from topology. There are more examples but they are scarce.

The background picture is named "The last selfie on earth".

It is time to end this update. Thanks for your attention and don't forget that without enough killing of Russian soldiers this concept of last selfie on earth only comes closer and closer... Till updates.

(05 April 2023) No intro, just two items:

Item 1) And then there were 31: Finland welcomed in NATO.
Item 2) Another "Magnetic monopoles do not exist!" kind of video.

 Item 1) And then there were 31: Finland welcomed in NATO.

Well NATO and Finland did not let much grass grow over it. Just recently the last parliaments of the other NATO members approved and now Finland is already in. The picture from below is the flag raising ceremony so for the Fins that was an important moment. 

It also happened, I did not know that, but the Finnish diplomat had to give some papers to Blinken from the USA. I didn't know you had to do separate papers for requesting to enter NATO to the USA.
But it has it's own logic; Likely the USA started this whole NATO thing and as such they still have those old ceremonial stuff in place. And why change if it works properly? In practice this only means the USA is the last to approve the membership of Finland.   

The Finnish were already integrating their military forces into NATO. That's a lot of work. Likely NATO uses still those long stock numbers for all kinds of spare parts that are needed for military gear. Every screw, every bold, every washer, every piece of cable has it's own NATO stock number.  

So in theory from every part inside NATO you can order for any kind of stock number if you need such a part. Hopefully at present day the logistics work better compared to when I was a draftee. I once lost a door from my one-ton truck that was build in the year 1955 or 1956. If memory serves it took over one month before a new but already 30 year old truck door was delivered from the local stock piles.

I would like to add: Finland welcome in the NATO allience! 

 Item 2) Another "Magnetic monopoles do not exist!" kind of video.

At first I wanted to be very very negative over those bunch of idiots known as the physics professors in general and professor David Tong in particular about keeping on telling crap not supported by and experimental proof that magnetic monopoles do not exist.

But in the intro of the video you hear that David is 'Exceptionally smart' and because I am also a very polite person I think that is a good way to look at David. You can say his cognitive capabilities are 'beyond measurement' or that they are 'off the scale'.
Yes why not be in a friendly and positive constructive mood today? 

It's no secret that for say seven years I think that electrons are magnetic monopoles. And despite the long list of problems there are with viewing the electron as a 'tiny magnet' this idiot show just keeps going on and on. This video is only about 11 months old so the weirdo's still rule the asylum.

I selected this video because it is relatively long (about 1.5 hours so far above the average TikTok user attention span) and because David proudly says words like "how do we know this, that is because of the law of magnetism from Gauss".

These idiots or 'exceptionally smart' people never ever checked if the Gauss law for magnetism was also true for unpaired electrons. There has never done an experiment that proves the Gauss law for magnetism for individual electrons. 

Often I have wondered why the physics professors do not see for themselves that:
1) If you claim the Gauss law for electrons, where is your experimental proof? And:
2) Why don't they see for themselves they are talking nonsense about electron spin?

Anyway it is what it is, in this world there is no shortage of 'exceptionally smart' people. Click on the picture if you want to see the video, the stuff about the Gauss law for magnetism can be found at 20 minutes into the video: 

Video title: David Tong: The Allure of the Magnetic Monopole
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ma4NgH8abKU

Historically the physics professors just never ever thought it was a good idea to check if indeed the electrons are also tiny magnets. Gauss died long before electrons were discovered:

Carl Friedrich Gauss.
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Friedrich_Gauss
Died in 1855. 

Discovery of the electron:

Discovery of electrons
https://www.britannica.com/science/atom/Discovery-of-electrons
discovery by English physicist J.J. Thomson of the electron in 1897 

If you give the physics professors some math that fits reality rather good, they will always abuse it beyond repair. They never checked if the Gauss law was true for electrons and at present day these weirdo's tell us we can build quantum computers based on their fantastic ideas of electron spin.

End of this update.   

(31 March 2023) A lot of countries have started delivery of tanks and other forms of armored vehicles like those Bradley fighting vehicles. A lot of people working in military logistics have made many hours in order to get the stuff over there. Thanks!

It is late so I would like to go directly to the two items for today: 

Item 1) Advertisement new math post.
Item 2) An infinite universe? Are there copies of you out there? Nope!

 Item 1) Advertisement new math post.

Yesterday I uploaded the latest post to the other website. It takes place in the space of 3D circular numbers, so the third power of the first imaginary unit is +1.  

Anyway such number always have a determinant because they also have matrix representations and the interesting fact is that you can always factorize this inside the space you are working in.

These factors contain something that I call the conjugate 'determinant style' so yesterday I uploaded it and today I realized "Wasn't there something know as the adjoint matrix that is the same?" 

Well yes but I did name it a bit different but that adjoint matrix is a very beautiful thing because it is so strong related to the inverse of a matrix. As a background picture I used the tank delivery ceremony from a few days back. Now in the middle you see an expression for the inverse of a 3D circular number. 

It is all utterly simple: Multiply left and right by det(X) and by X itself and voila there is your factorization of the determinant! Click on the picture to land on the new post: 

Title of the new post: Factorization of the determinant inside the space of 3D circular numbers. Aka: The conjugate ‘determinant style’. 

Ok time is running on so fast to the next item. 

 Item 2) An infinite universe? Are there copies of you out there? Nope!

The video I want to show you is from the channel Closer to Truth and to be honest I would not recommend it to view a lot of videos from that channel. It's mostly overpaid middle aged white males talking about vague stuff that somehow must resemble some scientific stuff.  

Most of the time it is just vague stuff not very sciency stuff so to say. In this video it is once more promoted that if the universe is infinitely big, in that case there must be all kinds of copies of yourself but also copies of the earth or our solar system even our galaxy out there.

Why they pay so much money to people that stupid is unknown to me, may be it is better if you see the video first for yourself so that you know what the folks are saying about an infinite universe. (Here we are talking about an infinite universe in the sense there is only one universe and that one is infinitely big.)

The picture has nothing to do with this video or the idea of copies of yourself, it is another weird philosophical thing of total nonsense: We are living inside a simulation... Anyway click on the picture to land at the video:  

Video title: Joshua Knobe - What Would an Infinite Universe Mean?
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPuFx_x2KKA

Now back to our idiotery as exposed in this video: If the universe is infinitely big, will there be copies of yourself be out there far away in this infinitely big universe?

I think a simple no, let me explain.

As long as our world or your body is just a finite collection of discrete states, only in such a case there will be repetition if the universe was made up of random stuff. 

But the universe is not made up of random stuff, it all is caused by stuff from the past.

On top of that: It is completely unknown if say the earth is just a finite collection of discrete quantum states. For that to be true at least space itself has to be quantisized, that is it is made up of small quanta of space or small atoms of space. 

If this is not the case, it space is truly a continuous thing and not made up of small discrete things, the number of possible configurations of you becomes so large that math folks like me say: Hey that is overcountable, this infinity is so big that there will never be a repetition of you even if the universe is infinitely big.

Well you can write big books about this, I will not do that but only say it is utterly nonsense to believe that if the universe is infinite therefore it 'must be' there are copies of you out there. 

End of this update, so live your unique life in such a way that more of those Russian soldiers get killed. And know that overpaid while middle aged males often embrace in nonsense talk big time.

Thanks for your attention.  

(29 March 2023) It looks like everybody is waiting on some kind of offense by the Ukrainians. Hard to say when it's going on but a lot of stuff like tanks have only been delivered recently and before an offensive there should be at least some rudimentary form of repair & maintenance & a flow of spare parts.

But lets go to the two items for today. 

Item 1) Concentration camps & German tanks for Ukraine?
Item 2) A noteworthy addendum to a correction I made.

 Item 1) Concentration camps & German tanks for Ukraine?

Ok this is a strange title for an item, but the two things have nothing to do with each other. A few days back it emerged in the news that according to some leaked FSB documents Putin wanted concentration camps in Ukraine and door to door terror. 

I have no idea if it is true, it could be one of those perfect war rumors based on nothing but given the emotion involved a lot of people believe it. But it could be true because it could explain that weird talk in Russia about fighting nazism. Also lately Putin brought forward again that nonsense of bio labs in Ukraine (for bio warfare against the holy Russian empire or so).

That all abundantly shows he has lost with reality a long time ago. In my view he is indeed mentally ill but is much much better at hiding it compared to say the donald.  

And the idea of building concentration camps in Ukraine if true is one more example that Putin just has lost contact with reality. You can't do that with such low numbers in the invading forces; the frontlines are vast and long. 

If you have never looked it up, look for the world war 2 Operation Barbarossa that was the invasion of Russia by the fascists. I don't remember the number of soldiers precisely but if memory serves is was something like 3.5 million...

So the Krmlin is run by total idiots believing in weird stuff like bio labs and a complete misinterpretation of their own military abilities...

I don't know if the next media outlet is reliable (it sounds a lot like some gossip paper), but here is that rumor: 

Putin wanted ‘total cleansing’ of Ukraine with ‘house-to-house terror,’ leaked spy docs reveal. Link used: https://nypost.com/2023/03/25/putin-wanted-total-cleansing-of-
ukraine-leaked-spy-docs-show/ 

It seems that about 18 Leopard 2 tanks have gone from Germany to the UA. So some people should no longer say Germany does nothing because it also was reported that some German tank schools just don't give lessons because they don't have tanks... 

In my own country it is the same when it comes to tanks: at the time the decision was made to get those tanks out of our military it was of course unknown that in the future some mental weirdo would be the political commander of the Russian forces.
Lets go to the next item.

 Item 2) A noteworthy addendum to a correction I made.

I did my best to make this title as boring as possible. It is indeed so boring that after reading it only a few times you should feel sleepy. But serious, when I made a mistake I will say so if significant enough.  

In the beginning of this month I had to withdraw my idea that solar sunspots are emerging from a rotational differential in the sun (at the equator the sun rotates faster compared to her polar regions). 

Solar spots often come in pairs and if my version of rotating plasma were true the leading sun spot in such a pair should always have the same magnetic polarity over the entire solar spot period of 22 years. 

It doesn't, so my idea of this rotational differential is not the main driver behind sun spots. The noteworthy addendum is that this is all I have to withdraw. 

The idea that electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles stays firmly up. My fault was in the possible cause of the sun spots, not in the much more fundamental insight that electrons are likely magnetic monopoles.

So spinning plasma will always spit out electrons, become very positively charged when it comes to electric charges and the magnetic fields become very strong. Below you see a bit that those astrophysical jets can be huge & very energitic.

Those astrophysical jets are observed in black holes, neutron stars and much more important: In the formation of new stars.

If even these jets are observed in the formation period of stars, there is little doubt my ideas about rotating plasma carry some significance.

The astronomy professors cannot explain such jet formation at all because they are bound to the Gauss law for magnetism that says magnetic monopoles do not exist. They never check if indeed particles like electrons follow this Gauss law for magnetism.

In my view we can safely conclude that the physics professors are very good at saying "We do not understand this or that", stuff like the temperature of the solar corona or say the above of jet formation.

We must applaud that, after all societies run best when people can do the things they are good at. And the physics professors are very good at saying that they just can't find magnetic monopoles.   

So let them keep on doing what they are good at! If it makes them happy that is good for society... Or not?

A link to my correction from the beginning of this month:
Correction: My spinning plasma model for sun spots is likely not correct 

Oh oh, it is time to close this update and can I thank you for your attention? 

(24 March 2023) The two items for this update are:

Item 1) Ukraine should surrender to Russia?
Item 2) Kathy on Hamilton quaternion stuff + THE VECTOR WARS!!!!!

 Item 1) Ukraine should surrender to Russia?

Times Radio found a number of people simply rejecting all this war stuff and the most extreme opinion was that Ukraine simply must surrender to Russia. 

Needless to say I do not agree with that but everybody has the right to some form of opinion. Of course it can happen that you have to surrender, it is never a fun thing to do but it can happen. Beside that, stuff like that is simply for Ukraine to decide no matter what opinion I might have upon that detail.

What those UK peace huggers mostly have wrong that in the very hypothetical case Ukraine surrenders, that only enforces the military behavior of the Russians. So that after they have rebuild their military a new invasion will be on the horizon.

But like a good reporter I am willing to show other sides of the story, why not? I took the freedom to use a picture that is not from the video but shows a new form of drone: a remote controlled small vehicle. Click on the picture for the video:

Video title: ‘Ukraine should surrender’ | British peace protesters on the Ukraine war.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqLBcz52rmQ
The video is about 7 minutes long. 

I have no idea how much explosives such a tiny vehicle can carry. But good military grade explosives are rough; just look at a hand grenade, it's not much explosives and very deadly anyway... 

 Item 2) Kathy on Hamilton quaternion stuff + THE VECTOR WARS!!!!!

A few weeks back I showed you the previous video of Kathy from the Youtube channel Kathy loves physics. In that video she already remarked that even the Maxwell equations were formulated in terms of the quaternions of Rowan Hamilton. 

A few weeks back I showed you what Hamilton did do wrong when he could not find the three dimensional complex number. For me it has always been puzzling as why Hamilton tried for a full decade to find the 3D complex numbers, a decade is a long long time.   

In this video this mystery even deepens, Kathy claims he also invented all that vector stuff like divergence and curl. Even the inner product she claims. I don't know a lot of the history of mathematics but if those claims are all true I would rank Hamilton higher as say the Gauss guy who is often referred to as the prince of math.  

I don't know what to think of it; was the inner product between vectors just never used before Hamilton? It could very well be because the vector wars (also covered in Kathy her video) were from a later date. Click on the picture to land at the video:

The operator in that yellow square is very interesting, it shows Rowan Hamilton understood he factorized the Laplacian (that is that thing at the bottom) just like I have done a lot of times. Those are always lovely calculations, in this case you can try it for yourself:

Square that triangle operator above using the rules for multiplication on the quaternions. Here you need stuff like ij = -ji, ik = -ki etc etc. If you do that you see that if you square the triangle thing you don't get nine terms but only three because the rest vanishes.  

So that is how the Maxwell equations were formulated: it is a bit clumsy but in those times the quaternions were relatively new so why not give it a try and see where it all lands? At present day the quaternions are never used anymore in the Maxwell equations.

__________

At the end of the video it is about the so called vector wars. It abundantly shows most math professors are just nut jobs. Back in the year 2012 when I picked up the subject of 3D complex numbers again I have thought a bit about trying to get a promotion at the local university for the study of 3D complex numbers.

After giving it a lot of thought I decided not to do that and indeed just keep it a new hobby. After all it would take a tremendous amount of war before math professors would do normal on the detail of 3D complex numbers.

These math professionals are all nut jobs. And why should I go to war with a bunch of overpaid nut jobs? That is not a rational thing to do, if they want to stick to the complex plane only when it comes to complex analysis, let the worms live in the dirt where they belong...

That was it for this update, as you see I am a war avoiding person so I am not distracted by overpaid weirdo's now there is this Russian stuff going on in Ukraine. That war is worth paying attention to.

Thanks for your attention.     

(22 March 2023) Oh oh an awful lot happened, for example the Vlad was indicted by the ICC for the kidnapping of thousands of children. It's a symbolic move but now Vladimir Putin can be arrested anywhere in the world and if he goes to member countries of the ICC it is obliged that he will be arrested. 

That was funny news but lets go fast to our two items for today: 

Item 1) What happened in Suisse over the weekend? It looks weird...
Item 2) EU donating one million artillery shells to Ukraine! YES!!!

 Item 1) What happened in Suisse over the weekend? It looks weird...

The Credit Suisse takeover by USB this weekend has gone weird: About 17 billion € in so called AT1 bonds were wiped out but shareholders not. This was possible via a change in legislation over the weekend.  

It looks like a total panic over there at the regulators, an alternative explanation is that they wanted to keep the Saudi & other mideast money at friend and as such did choose for this weird change in law. 

Other countries have come out stating such a thing would not be possible over there: First the shareholders take a beating and that's it. 

Last week in the USA suddenly all amount in the accounts were guaranteed while usually there is a ceiling of 250.000 US$ in place. But that change is not very significant, at most the money streams to the FDIC must double and of course that must be paid by the banks and the holders of big deposits at those banks. 

But the Swiss thing is of another order. Why change the order between bondholders and shareholders? Well lets see and wait how this all will pan out. 

Further reading from Bloomberg: 

Exit Bankers, Enter Lawyers in Credit Suisse Saga 

At last I want to remark that these bank runs are still pretty weird, the problem of uninsured bank deposits is a problem that is about 300 years old. Why is there no simple plain vanilla commercial insurance against this kind of bank defaults? 

If memory serves, before the financial crisis there were also products like buying a AAA-rating if you wanted to issue bonds as say a US municipality. Now those were crazy products if not well capitalized but stuff like uninsured bank deposits? 

It beats me as why this is a problem, at worst it's a problem for badly run banks. 

 Item 2) EU donating one million artillery shells to Ukraine! YES!!!

Yes, this is the stuff making me proud on the EU. It seems to be a package of two billion € where one billion is meant to deplete existing ammo depots in Europe and the other billion for procurement of a similar batch of artillery rounds.

All 155 millimeter diameter of course, the procurement is done inside the EU and also Norway who is not a full EU member but we have close ties in a lot of stuff.  

__________ 

In another development inside Crimea a bunch of Russian cruse missiles exploded while they were transported via rail. The attack was done with drones it was rumored, but were they Chinese drones? Right now the Chinese prez Xi is visiting the Vlad so using Chinese drones would be and extra funny detail in this all. 

That the end of this post, I didn't have time to make enough pictures so all I have is something unrelated to the above items. It is about the rather silly way robots are often portrayed in videos about artificial intelligence.

Why is it always so weird and stupid? From female shaped robots with boobs to what you see below a human in a plastic robot suit. To at the bottom of the picture where computer generated images depict robots typing on laptops...   

Why always so fucking stupid? Robots typing with a speed of about 100 characters per minute? Why don't they plug in a UBS cable to that laptop and since they are robots anyway: Why would they need a laptop in the first place?

End of this update, let me try to find that button named 'publish website' and thanks for your attention. Till updates. 

(17 March 2023) The financial markets are still spooked by all that is happening in the banking sector importantly the sell off in bank shares. In my view there is too much crisis for too little reason. Anyway the good thing is the ECB raised rates by another 50 basis points today so no weak knees or so. 

It's late already so lets go to the two items for today:

Item 1) All quiet on the Bakhmut front?
Item 2) Advertisement for latest math post: new 4D numbers!

 Item 1) All quiet on the Bakhmut front?

From the channel Veteran combat reacts I found these screenshots that show amazing little fighting in Bakhmut. I think the name of the guy running that Youtube channel is Paul and Paul is constantly worried about a possible fall of Bakhmut. And often say they should retreat. 

I too became more and more worried the last weeks but as usual most of the time the Ukrainians perfectly know what they are doing. There were only three attacks reported in the last 24 hours so we can wonder if the Wagner group is running out of steam.

Click on the picture if you want to see the video:

Video title: Ukraine's Secret Weapon Turns Russian Tanks into Scrap! 16 Mar 23
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vyb_AuDMYsg 

Paul discusses one of those mine throwers that are given to Ukraine. Before this war I never heard of them but there are weapon systems that can throw anti tank mines rather precise over long distances. 

I agree with Paul that it is important Ukraine gets those kind of advanced weapon systems. After all Russia is also throwing in her big tech in the form oh hyper sonic rocketry. 

So Ukrainians should have good stuff too in order to defend herself against a crazy invasion done by a crazy form of Kremlin mindset.  

 Item 2) Advertisement for latest math post: new 4D numbers!

A few days back I posted some math where on 7 different spaces I more or less solve the same easy to understand differential equation. I will be the first to remark that this is a very easy differential equation, you only search for a solution where the derivative is the square of the position. 

If you phrase it in words like above it sounds very complicated but actually it is very simple. A possible solution is for example the geometric series and that is century old simple plain math stuff. 

Anyway on 7 different spaces I do this, three spaces are just plain vanilla math spaces like the real line, the complex plane and the plane of split complex numbers. The other spaces are crafted by myself and include the 3D complex and circular numbers and their four dimensional cousins and nephews.
The result is that all results are very similar, the solutions only become more complicated if you look at higher dimensions but basically it is all the same.   

Why should that be important? Well on this little planet there is a profession known as math professors. And the overwhelming opinion over there is that the only possible reasonable expansion of the complex plane is the 4D quaternions.

In my view this is not correct, stuff like that is only the historical timeline along such number systems were found and that's all. There is not much logic in jumping from the complex plane to only the quaternions, any person that understands a bit more about math will say this is the behavior of people that have some mental thing. 

And yes these people have some 'mental thing' for sure. If you look at the simple list of results on 7 different spaces and you keep on telling that historical nonsense, you as a math professor must have a serious mental thing.

Click on the picture to land at the new post: 

Post title: Comparison of the ‘Speed = the Square’ equation on 7 different spaces.

By the way the background picture is not a photo or so. It is one of those many AI generated images where the developments go fast and furious. Compare that to math professors where it always goes slow and avoid always the long term progress.

So if you are not into math that much, the above background picture was made by Midjouney version 5 and in case you have nothing better to do you could look at the next video: You Won't Believe MidJourney V5 is This Good
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxhW0SCsPu8

It's late so let me hit the button 'publish website'. Thanks for your attention.

(15 March 2023) The training of Ukrainian tank crews is more or less in full swing. It helps a lot that they already know how to drive those other tanks, but likely there are a lot of new technical details to learn when it comes to that Leopard tank stuff.

The first use of JDAM BOOM stuff was reported. And there also seem to be gliding JDAMs that have two small wings and glide to their target. Well be careful my dear Ukrainians but I wish you luck with the usage of them.

At the Pentagon they likely see water burning: Reinko wishing Ukrainians good luck with the air power stuff? What has happened? Nothing to worry about my dear Pentagon, after all it is much better that Ukraine wins this conflict and yes sometimes over here the goal serves the means.  

Today's first item is about that weird panic on the financial markets in particular bank stocks. So lets go there: 

Item 1) SVB risk team: The physics professors of US banking?
Item 2) A small example of the new Midjourney5 that will come out this week.

 Item 1) SVB risk team: The physics professors of US banking?

The collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank was swift and brutal. And because we now have three banks collapsing in just a few days time, do I think there will be a new financial crisis? 

Me too I am in the camp that this is not very likely. For example just before the financial crises back over a decade the Federal Reserve so called Z1 release indicated that the entire US financial sector would need about 2.4 trillion US$ in fresh extra debt in order to maintain business as usual. Of course that would never happen, back in the time a trillion had much more value as a trillion today. 

If you listen to the details of the SVB collapse they are staggering in stupidity: They sit on 100 billion of deposits and bought a lot of long term treasuries in order to squeeze out that extra 1 or 1.5%. Zero protection against a decline in the value of those treasuries. That is not needed because they are hold to maturity and as such the book value is not the market value. I mean this is stupid by all standards, so I do not expect this practice to be widespread throughout the banking system.  

At least at one point in time it looks reasonable that at least one employee at SVB remarked that may be they should guard against downside risks, but the management or risk department did just nothing. Well that looks a lot like for example physics professors behave in my little corner of understanding the universe. 

No matter how often I remark that if you think your precious electrons are tiny magnets, shouldn't it be time to conduct some experiment that proves electrons are indeed tiny magnets? 

That is because to me anyway it looks like they just don't behave like tiny magnets. Physics professors, weird and stupid as they are, are not capable of figuring out for themselves that if electrons have two magnetic poles, they must be neutral when it comes to magnetism. On top of that it is known that electron pairs are neutral when it comes to magnetism.

But unpaired electrons are not neutral to magnetism, hence the only logical conclusion is that electrons are magnetic monopoles. If you use that small change in thinking this explains a lot, for example why do we only observe electron pairs but never electron triples or quartets?

In my view the bankers from SVB are even more stupid as physics professors who believe in weird fairy tales like electrons are tiny magnets. But the difference is not that big, physics professors have more cognitive capabilities as those SVB bankers but they are still fucking stupid. 

Just like at SVB it was not considered to pay for hedging the risk to just one 100 billion or more in deposits... 

Yes there are a lot of similarities here: Just not responsive over a few years of time is the most important similarity and of course: Being stupid in the first place... 

 Item 2) A small example of the new Midjourney5 that will come out this week.

The next picture is made by Midjourney and it is astonishing. Can you tell the difference with a real photo? It becomes harder and harder. 

It's only the behavior of the barbed wire in this picture that is a bit strange. But it also has many features that make you think you are looking at a real photo. 

Ok that's it for this update. Thanks for your attention. 

(10 March 2023) There was a fresh round of Russian rocket attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure. This time they used more rocket types that are hard to shoot down like those hypersonic rockets. So the series of open war crimes continues and sometimes I wonder why countries like China still support Russia.
Ok ok after four years of donald trump it is understandable that China needs a few years to recover but siding with a bunch of weird war criminals is likely not a strategy born from wisdom.  

Just one item for today: 

Item 1) More Nord Stream news and an update on the econ sanctions against Russia.

 Item 1) More Nord Stream news and an update on the econ sanctions against Russia.

Two video's in this item, the Nord Stream video is about 45 minutes and the vid on economical sanctions is only 8 minutes or so. 

In Germany the investigation is still ongoing and they warn against jumping to conclusions too fast. Well on the day the attacks took place, at the end of that day after 2 or 3 minutes thinking about all that information for myself I took the conclusion that it was likely the USA. 

Of course I too don't have a snippet of proof for that so it is better to name it a hypothesis that might need a bit more investigation.

The last days there are rumors that the sabotage attacks were done by some pro Ukrainian group. Well that is very interesting but an attack like this needs a high degree of professionalism and for me it is hard to phantom that some amateurs were driving about with hundreds of pounds of high explosives in their cars. 

Anyway this pro Ukrainian group has allegedly rented a yacht that belongs to two Ukrainians and on that yacht traces of explosives were found. If I remember it correct these traces were found in January so it is hard to say how substantial this is. After all if it was done by professionals, these pro's could also have created many false leads like brushing a bit of high explosives here and there.  

Welcome to conspiracy land by the way. 

Then there is that talk of some covert operation done by Ukraine herself. I don't think that bears any logic. In the first place they have Russian gas pipes right in their own territory so why not blow that up? Or more locally attack gas pipes going to Turkey.  

So the last days I have seen nothing that changes my mind on my original conclusion or hypothesis from Sept last year. As always click on the picture to land on the video: 

Video title: Nord stream Sabotage revelations : 
Who’s really behind Russian gas pipeline explosions? • FRANCE 24. 
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7QMPSM6u-s 

__________

Ok economical sanctions. The video is very funny, the Yale professor looks like some angry professor from the muppets. He sounds like a true anti USSR iron eater trahing all things related to Russia.

Of course that is the right attitude but at the same time we must always stay realistic. The strategic goal of the economical sanctions is to weaken the Russian economy to the extend they can not repeat a military adventure as they do today in Ukraine. 

That strategy is in the interest of all European nations regardless of NATO membership. We don't want that kind of shit Russia, so we will keep on applying more and more economical sanctions until this  long term strategic goal is there. 

One thing I would like to remark is that I did see a few times the VAT taxes a collected by the Russian state. At first sight these are so dramatic in decline that it validates a lot of what the Yale professor says on this detail.
But we must not jump to significant conclusion on just a VAT collecting detail. May be Russia has a very different VAT collecting system at hand. If for example all basic goods have 0% VAT and only the very luxury things have a significant level of VAT, the decline in Russian collected VAT taxes only means a shift away from luxury items. 

So we must be sure the economical damage is there and not be lazy engulfing ourselves in shallow thinking. We must never become as what the math professors are: lazy, shallow thinkers and overpaid overpromoted individuals. No, a fresh brain willing to learn is a far better thing to have behind your eyes and between your ears.

As always click on the picture for the perfect muppet economics professor from Yale: 

Video title: Russia Economy Collapsing, Says Top Yale University Professor
Li9nk used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B643JWVOO2g 

I have to say the screen shot is a bit confusing: At the left you see the DW logo and that stands for Deutsche Welle while TYT as far as I know stands for The Young Turks.

May be it is better to close this update, bring you a salut from a beautiful country named Conspiracy Land. Thanks for your attention & please never become as stupid as a math professor...

(08 March 2023) Well Bakhmut is still standing and it seems both parties are willing to throw in more of their best fighters. US SecDef Lloyd Austin came out stating that the loss of Bakhmut is not a strategic victory for Russia.
That is correct of course but another analyst pointed out that the Ukrainians have to fight Russia somewhere so why not Bakhmut? But a lot of people constantly seeing the Ukrainians surrounded from three sides and as such we worry too much Ukrainians can get killed. We don't want that of course.  

But it is their fight and it is always better if the Ukrainians decide upon themselves what is best or what they want. And it is clearly not crazy to keep on fighting in Bakhmut, after all a lot of Russians died in that place.   

__________

I cleaned this homepage, the old stuff is in the archives and if stuff is ok this homepage will load again much quicker. That took a lot of time so I only have one item for you today. Let's go: 

Item 1) BBC on the Wuhan lab leak hypothesis concerning COVID-19.

 Item 1) BBC on the Wuhan lab leak hypothesis concerning COVID-19.

Most of the time since we have the new virus around I always considered an accidental lab leak the most likely candidate for the entry of the new virus into the population. And I always put much much less weight on the possibility it has come from that food market.  

We are now a few years further down the timeline and for the food market hypothesis to be true there must be some intermediary animal species that caused the first human infections. This intermediary animal species has never been found so as the years go by that weakens and weakens the food market hypothesis. 

In my view this lab leak was an accident, only a person that is mentally ill would do such a leak on purpose. Please remark this all is not a proof that it was indeed a leak from the Wuhan lab but it keeps on weaving a pattern that makes it the most likely candidate. 

In the USA the CIA came also out a few days back they are still looking into the lab leak hypothesis. And that is a reasonable thing to do. 

The video is just a few minutes long, click on the picture to land on the video: 

Video title: What do we know about the Covid-19 lab leak theory? - BBC Newsnight
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DV_Cxunq7m4 

In the beginning for a short time I believed what the scientists initially said: It is from nature, do not doubt that. Such stuff is known as arguments from authority, the experts try to convince you they are right for some reason. I remember arguments like 'There are no lab made changes to the virus it is all 100% natural'. 

I don't know enough about viruses to judge for myself if the original COVID-19 was 'natural' or 'likely lab modified'. I also do not say the scientists claiming it had to be of a natural origin were lying. Likely they had no clue what they were talking about, just like math professors when they talk about complex numbers.   

__________ 

And what about that other thing that sucks in conspiracy theories? The bombing of the Nord Stream pipelines? Today the Americans came out with the view that it is possible it was not done by Russia but by a 'pro Ukraine group'.  

Oh oh my poor brains are working overtime: It could be true, it could be done by a pro Ukraine group. Yes, after all the USA is pro Ukraine so it is possible. It is possible. 

May be it is better to end my typing and salut you from conspiracy land: SALUT! 

Thanks for your attention and see you in another update. 

End of this update, ChatGPT can you tell me how to keep the number of killed Russians above one thousand a day for the foreseeable future? 

Till updates. 

_________

For older updates see the archives at index18.htm or go to the oversight of the archive pages.  

 __________ End