(17 May 2024) It looks
like it is high time to clean up this homepage once more because
it is getting far to long. Anyway it looks like we have a new
government over here, that's about 5 or 6 months after the
election and as such that is pretty usual over here.
As comparison if you live in a two party democracy, transfer of
power is mostly done within a few days. There is never a lengthy
process of negotiations needed, if you have a majority you can go
at work right away...
I don't know much
about their plans, all I know is that our federal deficit is going
to be 2.8% of GDP. Needless to say I completely disagree with
that, it is better to budget a surplus of say 1% that can be used
in the course of the next fiscal year to compensate for financial
trouble on the way.
But we now have a bunch of populists, I am exaggerating a little
bit but there are now political parties who's members have a hard
time to make financial calculations. After all the accountancy of
an entire country is always a rather complicated thing... Lets go
to our items for today:
Item 1) More news from Anthony Blinken & Belbek air base
attacked twice.
Item 2) Skipped item on electron potential energy and
magnetism.
Item
1) More news from Anthony Blinken & Belbek air base attacked
twice.
Lately David Cameron
from the UK remarked that Ukraine was allowed to use British
weaponry against targets inside Russia. And now Anthony Blinken
has said words of similar phrasing. Let me quote a bit:
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Ukraine has to “make its own choice” when deciding to use US-made weapons to strike targets
inside Russia .
"We've not enabled or encouraged strikes outside of Ukraine, but ultimately, Ukraine has to make decisions for itself about how it's
going to conduct this war," he said during a visit to Kyiv on May 15.
Now the Russians are
shouting their military doctrine allows for a nuclear response if
they are attacked. As far as I know that is correct, that is
indeed inside Russian doctrine. But it's pointless remark because
neither the UK nor the USA is in fact attacking Russia. No that is
done by Ukrainians that indeed have a state named Ukraine and is
in response to the attacks from Russia since Feb 2022.
Originally all those
rules for Western weaponry for use inside Ukraine only, that was
done to de-escalate the situation. But now it has evolved into
Russia making escalatory use of that by staging attacks from
outside the reach Ukraine had due to these de-escalatory
measures.
Beside that I heard a
few times that Russia itself wants some kind of barrier between
those parts they have occupied and the rest of Ukraine. Why
shouldn't Ukraine have no right on a similar barrier along it's
border with Russia? That's a perfectly mirror arrangement so
the Kremlin should not complain upon this small detail. After all
my dear Kremlin occupants, you wanted this war with your smaller
neighbor yourself. So you have to eat the consequences too, that
is rather logical... Click on the picture for a news article from intellinews.com:
Atitcle title: US Secretary of State Blinken says Ukraine free to use US-made weapons to strike Russia.
Link used: https://www.intellinews.com/
us-secretary-of-state-blinken-says-ukraine-free-to-use-us-made-
weapons-to-strike-russia-325478/
__________
There was much much
more news of course, like in Kharkiv luckily the situation got a
bit stabilized. It seems all in all Ukrainian losses are about one
third of the Russian losses, so if you read a number so say 1200
Russian casualties (that is killed and wounded enough) there are
about 400 Ukrainians that more or less carry the same fate.
That's the grim reality but it has to be remarked I don't know how
solid as an overall statistic this one to three ratio
is...
Grim or not, sometimes
the news is funny like the Belbek air base on Crimean soil
attacked two nights on a row. Likely there was some more business
to do and that in itself brought a wide smile to my lips and
face.
Suchominus has a short
2 minute video out on the second attack. As always click on the
picture to land at the video from Suchominus at Youtube:
Video title: Belbek Air Base Attacked for a Second Night.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWOOfM8dP9E
Lets go to the next
item.
Item
2) Skipped item on electron potential energy and magnetism.
I have only 10 to 15
minutes left so I have to skip this item. All I wanted was to
describe the potential energy that one electron in an electron
pair generates on the other electrons in that pair.
And that only using
the official version of the potential energy of a dipole magnet in
an applied magnetic field, if you use that for the electron you
get crazy results within 5 minutes!
But we don't have the
time right now so I have to skip it. And once more the results
were so crazy that once more I do not understand why the
professional physics professors keep on holding to that total crap
of electrons being tiny magnets. Sometimes I just wonder what is
more stupid: The average Kremlin employee or the average physics
professor?
Lets leave it with
that, see you in a future update of this very website.
(15 May 2024) No intro
talk, here are the two item of this update:
Item 1) Kharkiv,
Shoigu gone, Belgorod and so on.
Item 2) New math post about eigen vectors of the process of
conjugation.
Item 1) Kharkiv, Shoigu gone, Belgorod and so on.
I was just checking if
there was more news of the developments in and around Kharkiv so I
click on that BBC video and the first thing that happens is
Anothony Blinken stepping out of a sleep train... And yes if you
have to travel long distances by train indeed a sleep train is a
very good alternative because you arrive a bit more fresh compared
to traveling during daytime.
Anyway the situation
in Kharkiv looked troublesome but also strange; if the Russians
had amounted 50 thousand military, is that enough to take on the
entire Kharkiv? No of course not, Kharkiv is too large for that.
And the removal of that UA commander from his post also looks
weird so we must wait a bit more until there is a bit more
clarity.
Also interesting: There was a day with an estimated 1740
casualties on the Russian side, I had been waiting for weeks for
such a number because it shows that finally a bit of the military
aid has reached the places where it needs to be: In the barrel of
an artillery piece or whatever what.
Click on the video for the BBC video:
Video title: Ukraine struggles to hold back Russia incursion near Kharkiv.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0I-Zq8Au-bU
Shoigu was replaced,
some say this is unexpected but didn't one or two of his deputies
get arrested on corruption charges? And one of those deputies also
has a giant house just like Shoigu but I don't know if he too got
it from his daughter the day she went 18.
The new guy also doesn't have military roots, just like Shoigu.
His name is Andrei Belousov and I did not try it very long but I
could not find his house in an internet search. Why is that
important? Well if he lives in a house paid for by his income, his
salary, in that case Andrei did not control large streams of money
in the past. And as such he is a relative powerless person in
Russia.
That doesn't mean he can't be a pain in the ass, if he manages to
reform the Russian economy towards a more efficient war economy
that would of course be bad news.
__________
From Belgorod was that
news of a severely damaged building, the Russians whining terror
terror and both parties blaming each other. It could have been
anything, from a Ukraine missile gone bad to a Ukraine missile
shot down and debris doing the damage. Or a Russian glide bomb
going astray.
The point I want to
make is there is only one to blame and that is of course Putin. If
he hadn't started this crazy war with all his mentally ill talk
about biolabs and other stuff, this Belgorod tragedy would not
have happened at all. I forget to save a link to that news so if
you missed it and want to know a bit more you must look it up
yourself.
Lets go to the next
item.
Item
2) New math post about eigen vectors of the process of
conjugation.
A few days ago I
published this new post, all in all I look at seven different
spaces and how to take the conjugate. Then make a matrix
representation of it and look what the eigen vector related to the
eigen value -1 is.
May be for you that is
a whole lot of abacadabra but this is very basic math for those
who know a bit more about math. Ok ok in over 30 years of time I
have never ever seen one person who did the conjugate for say 3D
complex numbers in the correct way, but it is an extremely simple
matrix if you write is as a matrix representation.
So the key idea of
this post is very basic, it is not complicated at all. And that's
why I myself am very glad with this post because years ago I
always found those pairs of imaginary units that together formed
those famous numbers tau.
And yes, they always came in pairs and it had it's own logic. But
the matrices I now have in this new post make it totally
unavoidable and much more simple as why we have all those pairs in
the first place.
Over the years I have learned that it is better to avoid
complicated things, after all is you have a good much more simple
result much more people understand it and those who want to look
at more complicated things can always do that
themselves.
Now mostly the last
time I use some pictures of female robots and a bit of my own math
to make a picture that you can click on if you want to read that
math from my deformed brain. This time I do it a bit different
because in the next picture you can see a robo dog on a yoga ball
and that is how fast the AI stuff evolves.
Compare that to the
speed of the development of quantum computer based on electron
spin or nuclear fusion based on magnetic confinement. Those
assholes are stuck in a dead end, make no significant progress at
all and in the meantime don't want to revise their idea's upon the
magnetic properties of electrons...
Here you see that robo
dog stuff, if you click on it you will land at my post on
3dcomplexnumbers.net.
Title of the new post:
Another way of finding the direction of the number tau. Link used:
https://3dcomplexnumbers.net/2024/05/11/another-
way-of-finding-the-direction-of-the-number-tau/
In case you want to
see the robot video, search for "AI conquers gravity" on
the youtube website.
End of this post, as
always thanks for your attention and see you in another
update.
(10 May 2024) Oh oh,
it is time to smash a lot of this homepage into the history pages
because once more this homepage is getting too long.
No intro blah blah, just the usual two items.
Item 1) Russian
reserves, a cute drone & an interesting vote in the USA.
Item 2) Plasma fusion instabilities & a tiny chunk of math.
Item
1) Russian reserves, a cute drone & an interesting vote in the
USA.
I didn't save the
source but it was told that both the USA and the UK are in favor
of confiscating all Russian reserves (so that is also the reserves
from the Russian central bank) while the EU is only willing to
confiscate the returns on those Russian reserves.
I myself am in favor
of such a total confiscation otherwise the Russians will simply
not learn from their mistake to do this illegal invasion BUT like
I remarked before we must avoid at all costs that central banks
are afraid to park their reserves at other central banks or other
commercial banks and financial institutions.
The UK & USA
proposal took that into account by remarking that if all countries
moved at the same time, that minimizes a possible damage to the
reserve status the diverse currencies have. This is a very
delicate operation (if it goes on) because if there grows distrust
in all the reserve stuff we can regret that for decades...
All I can say is I would vote in favor of it and if the EU doesn't
want it we must wait again another year or so.
__________
A very different
subject: Drones with machine guns! This is a very interesting
physics problem, how do you make a drone that will stay stable
while shooting bursts of ammo? After all the ammo acts as a strong
accelerator and that can make the drone instable.
A naive first idea is
that the center of gravity of the drone (included the machine gun)
must always lie inside the barrel of the machine gun. That is an engineering
challenge, how do you make some dynamical system that keeps such a
drone stable? May be some 'tail' with a weight at the end and this
tail can move to get a constant center of gravity inside the
barrel of the gun. We'll see how that will evolve.
This drone was
mentioned in a video from the channel Reporting from Ukraine,
click on the picture to land at the
video:
Video title: 08 May: Nice! Ukrainians UNLEASH FLYING MACHINE GUNS TO STORM RUSSIAN POSITIONS.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Seb51bbrMHo
Of course much more
happened but I want to close this item with that beautiful human
being Majorie Taylor Greene. She filed a motion to vacate the
chair of the speaker of the house, so the speaker Mike Johnson
doesn't get fired. No, his chair will become vacant...
By the way now I
follow that Majorie saga a bit more, I can tell you that she is
even dumber as our own Geert Wilders. That alone and on it's self
is a true miracle... But serious I hoped that when the Ukrainian
military aid passed the House that Mike Johnson would not loose
his job by that. Well the vote in the American house of reps
speaks for itself. There is an MSNBC video linked to it if you
want to see that:
I always love it when
UK and USA people suddenly know how to pronounce the word 'no'. In
my language we write it as 'nee' and that sounds an awful lot like
'nay'. May be it is time to go to the next item.
Item
2) Plasma fusion instabilities & a tiny chunk of math.
It's been a few years
since I looked at plasma stability in nuclear fusion reactors.
After all if my idea's of the magnetic monopole nature of
electrons (and protons) was true, that would likely spell disaster
for the plasma stability of those torus shaped nuclear fusion
vessels.
If true that electrons
are magnetic monopoles, the magnetic field that supposedly must
contain them will only accelerate the electrons more and more. And
the two types of electron monopole will move in opposite
directions and make bigger and bigger structures that will
accelerate together more and more. Total chaos would erupt in my
view.
Well how are we now a
few years later? Not much further, because the physics professors
are carved from the same wood as the math professors of course
they will make no progress. Will they pick up the idea that
electrons can't be the tiny bipolar magnets as they believe? Of
course not, they are nothing more as an interesting collection of
bags filled with wind.
But there are all
kinds of plasma instabilities and I have zero hope left that this
technique will help in fighting climate change. Here is a quote
about the disruptive behavior that plasma has inside such fusion
reactors:
Nuclear fusion power delivered by magnetic-confinement tokamak reactors holds the promise of sustainable and clean energy. The
avoidance of large-scale plasma instabilities called disruptions within these reactorsis one of the most pressing challenges because
disruptions can halt power production and damage key components. Disruptions are particularly harmful for large burning-plasma
systems.
And to top it off,
here is a cute wiki list with a lot of plasma instabilities:
Plasma stability
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_stability
I don't want to waste
more time on physics people that believe electrons are tiny
magnets, they are born stupid, they will die stupid and in the
meantime nothing happens.
__________
A tiny bit of math: I
am almost ready with a new math post on the other website. It's
about another way of finding the direction of some interesting
tangents. Here is just a picture with a few of the results in the
diverse spaces.
Basically it boils
down to finding eigen vectors of amazingly simple matrices. And if
you have found the eigen vector related to -1 you can shout BINGO
because you have found the direction of one of those famous
numbers tau.
Ok ok, there is also
some conjugate stuff in the new post.
Lets leave it with
that and let me try to upload this to our common garbage can: the
internet. As always thanks for your attention and see you in a
future update of the posts on this website.
(08 May 2024) I made a
small error last week when I said that Shell had delisted from the
Dutch stock market the AEX. That's wrong, a couple of years ago
they moved their headquarters to London. Shell is still a part of
our AEX as far as I know...
Anyway we had an all time high today, the AEX closed above 900.
That's for the first time in it's 41 year history. If you are from
another country you might think an index at 900 in 41 years of
time is not much, but we have an index that does not use the
dividends. So it's just pure stock value while if you reinvest the
dividend you will go faster of course. But it's already late so
lets go to our two items:
Item 1) Just too much
news from Ukraine, just a few details.
Item 2) Quantum spin ice & the 'official' magnetic
monopoles.
Item 1) Just too much news from Ukraine, just a few details.
Just too much news,
from sea drones with air-to-air rockets on them to a Russian speed
boat sunk. Interesting economical news were two facts:
Gazprom reported a
loss of 7 billion $, so that's an interesting development. And
from the about 800 air planes from Boeing and Airbus that Russia
stole after the illegal invasion of Ukraine, now are over 300 out
of action because they are used for cannibalization for the spare
parts. So a simple estimation says that this year we will pass the
mark of half of that stolen fleet out of action. Economical
sanctions go slow but they bite more and more while of course a
constant supervision of all the stuff is needed. For some strange
reason the Russians want to avoid them, that is strange because
that is illegal after my humble opinion.
From the UK came the
news that it would be ok to use UK weaponry against Russian
targets (that is inside Russia) but of course it had to be
military targets. Of course a whole lot of other nations have all
kinds of different opinions on this. For example in the beginning
Germany wanted only to hand over the Leopard tanks if the USA also
delivered tanks.
Well this day was coming for a long time of course and as such if
countries decide for themselves if weaponry is allowed on Russian
soil, at least they cannot say it's a fight against NATO... Oh you
say that the Russians constantly tell all kinds of weird stuff on
their state tv about the enemy as they perceive it. For myself
speaking I don't think the danger of some extra escalation by
Russia is high, you can never know for sure of course but can they
say open a second front right now?
There was a display of
captured Western military vehicles in Moscow, last week
I showed you the Abrams tank while we all gave that tank a
standing ovation... Anyway a video that I won't link to said the
Russians tried to damage the barrel of one such a tank and it
failed. So that's a bit funny news, here is how it looked:
A few hours back the
UK BBC reported that in Ukraine a plot was foiled to kill
president Zelensky. This plot was apparently a long time in the
making, it started already before the invasion... It's indeed a
crazy plan and given the fact Russia is behind it, it could even
be true. Click on the picture to land at the BBC video:
Video title: Russian plot to kill Volodymyr Zelensky foiled, Kyiv says.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onOshasuZ2k
Lets go to the next
item.
Item 2) Quantum spin ice & the 'official' magnetic
monopoles.
I found a relative
very good video on the subject of spin ice. Of course you are once
more invited to think a bit around the fascinating subject of
electron spin. That is you can compare for yourself how the
official version is (electrons are tiny bipolar magnets) versus
what I think of it: electrons are magnetic monopoles that cannot
flip their spin state.
The lady in the video
explains why it is called spin ice, that has to do with two spins
going in and two going out. And, that is important, she mentions
that this configuration minimizes the energy, that's an important
principle of course.
Well my version of
magnetic monopole electrons does the same thing, yes we must have
to north pole electrons and two south pole variants and yes this
minimizes the (potential) energy.
I selected this video
because it does what a lot of the video's on magnetism do: they
only talk about energy when it makes sense. And if it does not
make sense it is often completely ignored.
Look electrons are
tiny things with a small mass, if a bunch of electrons would fell
an external magnetic field the only logical energy thing they will
do is all 100% of them will align with the applied magnetic field.
Only that will lower their potential energy state.
But all those
experiments like the Stern-Gerlach experiment show, anyway that is
what the physics professors believe, that the tiny electron
magnets anti align themselves with the applied magnetic field. And
about 50% of the electron will anti align themselves, but where do
they get their energy from? Of course the lady in the video
carefully skips this energy problem with electrons as being tiny
magnets.
The anti alignment is just one of the many many energy problems
there are if it were true electrons were tiny magnets. The
electron pair is another example, why do two electrons anti align
their magnetic fields while forming say a bonding electron pair in
a chemical bond?
Why are these people
so fucking stupid year in year out? If you view electrons as
magnetic monopoles you just don't have all those weird energy
problems.
May be the brains of
physics people is some form of physics too and as such it prefers
to stay in the lowest energy state there is: Being as dumb as
possible...
But serious, in it's
kind the video is very good. Only the basic idea upon electron
spin is not, for the rest it's a perfect 10. As always click on
the picture to land at the
video:
Video title: Quantum Spin Ices and Magnetic Monopoles
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qvt4jw6k028
At about 6.00 minutes
into the video she begins talking the deeper kind of bullshit: She
starts to flip individual electron spins.
Lets leave it with
that because it's late. So thanks for your attention.
(03 May 2024) It is
crazytime again; this calendar year my small portfolio grew by
10.01%. That's much to fast of course but it always comes with
pulls and pushes. This day my own bank was to blame, they
announced a 2.5 billion € share buy back and as such the stock
price jumped by about 6% today. And that while ING hasn't bought
any stocks back yet...
It all started as a joke a few years ago, I was annoyed by the
total yearly costs of my portfolio so I just thought "Lets
buy some ING so the dividends will pay for the costs of my
portfolio". Now a few years later I can say: well they surely
pay for the costs...
But my first bank stock was ABN-Amro, at the time the Dutch state
was still the majority stock holder and that made it safe enough
to put some money in. Later came the ING joke and now both banks
together are over 10% of the entire portfolio. But lets not talk
dumb money and go to the items of today.
Item 1) An Abrams tank
made it to Moscow & more oil refineries hit.
Item 2) More multi worlds stuff & a DESMOS 3D graph.
Item
1) An Abrams tank made it to Moscow & more oil refineries hit.
Why not give a
standing ovation to this M1 Abrams tank, the very first to have
made it to Moscow. It is like seeing the oldest man on earth
finishing in say the Iron man triathlon, that is the stuff
miracles are made of.
Of course a lot more
did happen, it is still an entire war going on along a long long
frontline. A few more attacks on oil refineries and/or storage
places were there. I don't think attacks on Russian oil refineries
will have a huge impact on gas prices for the car at USA pumps.
Well inside Ukraine they likely understand it is not wise to maximize
the probability that Donald Trump will win the next USA
presidential election.
But for the time being
I view it is just like the Russian Black Sea fleet: Every ship
sunk is just one ship less to sink. The goal is not to sink just
one ship but the long term goal is to wipe out the entire Russian
Black Sea fleet. And for those oil refineries it is the same, it
has to happen anyway.
After all if a main
goal for Europe is to cripple the Russian economy such that they
cannot repeat to another EU nation as what they are doing to
Ukraine, it has to happen they will have almost no refinery
capacity at all... It's as simple as it is. I had two pictures
from a Newsweek article, click on the picture in case you want to
read that article:
Title: Blaze Engulfs Oil Refinery Deep Inside Russia After Ukraine Drone Strike.
Link used: https://www.newsweek.com/russia-ukraine-drone-attack-
oil-refinery-ryazan-1895908
Let us move our
attention to the next item.
Item
2) More multi worlds stuff & a DESMOS 3D graph.
I showed you the two
television physics professors Brian Greene & Sean Correll
lately. Now by sheer coincidence it was TODAY that they had a
video out TOGETHER!!!!
And see how beautiful
they look, it is a perfect pair of television physics professors.
They should make a movie poster out of it: Hunt for the 26
dimensions of string theory.
Anyway I did indeed
see all 35 minutes of the video so that you don't have to and as
such you will have no nightmares today related to this video. It's
all the usual stuff like the probabilistic nature of quantum
mechanics, that should explain why electrons are in a
superposition of spin up and spin down almost BY DEFINITION! And
of course our weirdo's Brian & Sean are full of confidence
because there is plenty of experimental evidence to go along with
their wildest dreams.
Do they see it as a problem we don't have a solid sequential or
repeated Stern-Gerlach experiment? Of course not, talking about
spinning electrons makes much better television circus, so they
only do that.
And see how beautiful
they look, for sure a golden couple. I would not advice it but if
you want to see the video click on the picture of the golden
couple:
Video title: Does Quantum Mechanics Imply Multiple Universes?
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsZ1aB5egEQ
After all that crap
let us floss our brain by looking at some simple math so we can
ignore the television professors. The free DESMOS online package
also has a 3D variant and I experimented a bit with it. I tried to
visualize the 3D complex exponential with it, that is the red
graph below. The blue graph is the surface where my beloved 3D
numbers have a determinant of one. The small purple line is a new
way of finding the tangent at the number 1.
As such I more or less
have found a new way of finding the tangent at 1 for what math
professors would name a Lie group.
The 3D DESMOS package
isn't bad, anyway it acts as a perfect antidote to the wisdom of
the television physics professors. Lets leave it with that and as
always thanks for your attention.
(01 May 2024) We had
the first warm day over here, anyway I consider 20 degrees as
being warm... Lets go to our items for today.
Item 1) Heinrich
Torsten on some UA troubles.
Item 2) Two physics video's; an interesting combination.
Item 1) Heinrich Torsten on some UA troubles.
This day I didn't had
the time to listen to Heinrich his video (he's from the Military
& History video channel) so this evening I looked it up again.
And today he is not mild upon the things that more or less go
wrong in Ukraine.
And yes a lot of those
problems have already emerged in other ways or video's. The lack
of manpower is just one of them. What I found interesting is that
he talks about the influence the long shortage of ammo &
weaponry has on the recruitment effort. I hadn't thought about
that one and of course that too is not a positive
thing.
Mobilize more men or
is that already maxed out? You can also think that after two years
all who want to fight have already done so. Questions like that is
for the Ukrainians to solve of course. Well I wish them luck with
it because these are hard questions for a society.
The video is about
half an hour long, as always click on the picture to land at the
video on Youtube:
Video title: Frontlines Crumbling in the East, Past Failures Compound. US buy Planes from Kazakhstan.
Link used:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrG9G23-0O8
Lets hope the
logistics chains will come big enough to help the UA military
forces a little bit. It has been a long wait those 6 months
without supplies.
Of course there was
much more news on this topic but it's now time to go to the next
item for today.
Item 2) Two physics video's; an interesting combination.
The television
professor in the first video is Sean Conner, likely you have seen
him before because he is very good as a television professor. He's
the guy that promotes the many world hypotheses of quantum
mechanics, that is the idea that with every (tiny) quantum effect
or outcome the universe splits in two or more branches. And that
all because otherwise parts of the wave function would collapse
and if the many world hypothesis is true that evil collapse would
not happen... I have no particular opinion on this hypothesis
beside I consider it nonsense and not a scientific thing.
Now Sean himself
starts talking on the Stern-Gerlach experiment, he gives the
official version of electron spin (quantisized angular momentum
and the vector can point in every direction only up or down).
Of course the usual stuff of the electron being in a super
position of the two spin states, that famous mixture of spin up
and spin down.
And believe it or not, he finishes it all of with saying that in
case there is not enough experimental evidence for something, you
should be careful with that...
So if idiotery can be
mapped on a scale of 1 to 10, Sean should come in like a big fat 9
on this scale of idiotery.
For example precisely
what experiment told us that electrons can be in a super position?
For the professional freaks of quantum mechanics the SG experiment
itself is a perfect and pristine example where spin super
positions break down due to an applied external magnetic field.
But for a person like
me that thinks electrons are magnetic monopoles that carry a
permanent magnetic charge just like their electric charge, the SG
experiment is also a validation of what I think.
Anyway if you see a
television professor, not only Sean but all of them, talk about
electron spin, take it with a grain of salt. And if they want more
money for quantum computing, just say no.
After so much blah
blah blah on my behalf, here is the first video:
Video title: Physicist explains quantum mechanics | Sean Carroll and Lex Fridman.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uexPZ8bKRT0
The nonsense Sean is
telling is deep in stupidity; as far as I know reality there is no
so called repeated or sequential Stern Gerlach experiment done
ever. My dear Sean, it is very much possible that electron spin
has nothing to do with probability.
Just like you try to
measure the electric charge of the electron or it's mass, it has
nothing to do with probabilities.
The lack of a serious
repeated or sequential SG experiment brings us to the second video
of this item: some short videos upon key experiments done in
physics. It is from the Unzicker guy who is about the opposite of
a television physics professor. But don't get fooled: He is a
staunch believer in electrons as tiny magnets too so likely he
will have no problem at all with a lack of a repeated SG
experiment.
Video title: Key Experiments of Physics: The Photoelectric Effect
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oN-sXhc8iCs
That was it for this
update, see you in the next one.
(26 April 2024) On
oilprice.com I came across that funny article as why Shell is
pissed with the London Stock Exchange and threatens to go to New
York... Well a few years ago Shell delisted from the Amsterdam
stock market and one of the arguments was the dividend tax. At
that point in time I already doubted how stupid the Shell
management was, but I kept my shares and did not sell them.
Anyway now a few years
further down the timeline we can conclude that shell management is
a bunch of so called overpaid weirdo's. Here is a funny
quote:
Sawan has also expressed deep frustration by investors' under-appreciation of the financial performance of the company, as well as the
British government’s over-taxation of its profits.
Source: Why Shell Has Soured on The London Stock Exchange
Link used:https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/
Why-Shell-Has-Soured-on-The-London-Stock-Exchange.html
Oh oh the energy
transmission is very important but all that Shell management does
is whine that their options and shares are not that high. As if
these crybabies have such low salaries to start with...
Lets go to the two
items of today:
Item 1) The USA
Ukraine aid bill is now law & more UA stuff.
Item 2) New math post & good video from Neil Turok on physics.
Item
1) The USA Ukraine aid bill is now law & more UA stuff.
I tried to find a
photo of the signing ceremony in order to get an image that was as
boring as possible but I could not find anything. But the Ukraine
aid bill is now already law so they don't let grow much grass over
it.
So I settled for the
next picture on the scale of boredom, that is likely a work
meeting at the White House, if you click on the picture you land
at defense.gov:
Source: Supplemental Bill Becomes Law, Provides Billions in Aid for Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan.
Link used: (It's a bit long so I skip the link here.)
There were many more
developments of course, one of them is that indeed there seem to
be ATACMS now and these go even a bit further as the
British/French Storm Shadow/SCALP missiles. Now Ukraine can cover
all of the territories occupied by Russia, so that is a welcome
development.
I want to remark that
the ATACMS could reach targets deep inside Russia, that's not
allowed of course but it shows the level of trust the USA
political leadership has in it's Ukrainian counter part. And
I heard some rumors those ATACMS are already in Ukraine since
February? Well that's interesting if true.
__________
At last a few remarks
on oil prices, it is well known that in the USA the consumer
prices at the pump are a political thing. They even use their
strategic oil reserve for dampening out the fuel pump prices. So
they are sensitive to that.
Now lately there were
a bunch of Ukrainian drone attacks against Russian oil refineries.
And can such attacks really drive up the prices for American
consumers inside the USA for what they pay for their gas for their
cars?
Well yes and no and
partially yes and/or partially no. Oil markets are very emotional
and by that I mean they do react on geo political situations. It's
not always rational but given the importance of oil that is also
understandable.
But if Ukraine takes
out Russian oil refinery capacity that means there is less refined
product inside Russia while there is more crude to export by
Russia. Furthermore, as far as I know, there is zero trade in
refined oil products going from Russia to the USA.
So my estimation is
that more attacks on Russian oil refineries will likely not lead
to a scenario of too high prices at the gas pumps in the USA. So a
refinery here or a refinery there is not much of a future problem
all in all.
But never forget, oil
markets can be emotional so that is a detail to keep an eye on.
Lets go to the next item.
Item
2) New math post & good video from Neil Turok on physics.
The latest math post
was published yesterday, it is very simple because it just looks
at a set of so called non-invertible numbers. Non invertible means
you can't divide by them, 2D number systems like those 2D
hyperbolic complex numbers have a lot of numbers that you can't
divide by.
Title & link:
A look at the set of non invertible hyperbolic 2D complex
numbers.
https://3dcomplexnumbers.net/2024/04/24/a-look-at-the-set-of-non-
invertible-hyperbolic-2d-complex-numbers/
__________
On a video channel
upon physics I came across a relatively good video that contains
an interview with Neil Turok about "The problem with
theoretical physics".
That is a very funny
title because there is not 'one problem' but just an
infinite set of problems. For myself speaking only, I think that
both theoretical and experimental physics do weird when it comes
to electron spin since the year 1922.
But physics people
themselves don't have any problem with all the weird things they
believe about electron spin, for example there is not much
experimental proof for their idea's. That in itself is a
problem.
Let me stop talking
and let you enjoy the video just like I did because it does not
contain anything about electron spin. So I did not have to listen
to all kinds of blatant nonsense.
By the way, Neil
thinks that the science of physics is so unproductive since say 50
years. So he is much more positive as I am with my Stern Gerlach
experiment from the year 1922. Click on the picture for the
video:
Video title: The Problem with Theoretical Physics | Neil Turok
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZY68NfjB24
That was it for this
update, thanks for your attention.
(24 April 2024) What I
find one of the disadvantages of getting older is that it is so
hard to get completely exhausted during physical activity. I
really miss that, I always slept perfectly on it. But it is what
it is, you can't turn back the clock and get a fresh body again.
And with the years comes a bit of wisdom, it's not real wisdom but
more the stuff you learned from your biggest mistakes. A bit of
wisdom is always welcome of course.
Lets go to the two items for today.
Item 1) Congress
passed the UA aid bill, now it's in the Senate.
Item 2) New math post is almost finished, it's mostly high school
math.
Item
1) Congress passed the UA aid bill, now it's in the Senate.
Last Saturday the US
House, that's their parliament, passed the aid to Ukraine in a
311:112 ratio, so 311 members in favor of supporting Ukraine. Well
I have no official job or so related to Ukraine but I want to
thank the US lawmakers for their support.
I could not find a
screenshot back but more as half of the Republicans voted against
it, that's likely one of the reasons it took so long to pass. For
the time being it looks like speaker Mike Johnson's job is secure
and that's a good thing. If after doing such a vote all kinds of
hell breaks loose, that is not a good thing of course and could
hinder future aid.
Of course it's still a
few days waiting because it has to pass the senate too and after
that Joe Biden has to sign it into law. And all those military
logistic chains have to come out of hibernation or, as we say it
here: they have to come out of their winter sleep.
The New York Post had
a funny cover, click on the picture for their article if you want
to read it:
Title: ‘Moscow Marjorie’ Taylor Greene, GOP rebels defeated as House passes $61B in Ukraine aid package.
Link used: https://nypost.com/2024/04/20/us-news/house-approves-
95b-in-military-aid-for-israel-ukraine/
There was a bit of
tweaking done to the aid package, quote:
The House rejiggered the Senate package by upping the amount of funding that goes toward stockpiles of American weapons and munitions,
adding oversight conditions on Ukraine assistance and doubling the amount of aid to Israel.
Comment: I can't
remember to have ever seen this work "rejiggered"
before, it is clear what it must mean and what would the rock band
the Rolling Stones think of this all? Likely Mr. Jagger will
hang on to the opinion that it should be rejaggered...
But serious, it's now
in the Senate for a 30 hour long (sic!! 30 hours long?) thing. Is
that a 30 hour long debate around the clock? In that case you can
say that American senators actually work for their money?
Here's a quote from The Hill:
Senators will hold the first procedural vote on the $95 billion aid package Tuesday afternoon, starting a 30-hour clock toward a vote
on final passage. That would take place Wednesday night absent a deal on amendments, with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) increasingly likely to let the clock wind down instead.
Aritcle title: Senate set to advance Ukraine aid after roller-coaster House battle.
Link used: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/4612843-
senate-vote-ukraine-aid-israel-taiwan/
At last there was some
anti TikTok legislation in the bill, to be honest I am in favor of
scrapping such websites. Not only because of national security
reasons but the first teenagers that can't view a whole Youtube
video of say 10 minutes long are already there. They have an
attention span of less then 10 minutes, that is not what we should
have as future adult citizens.
I don't know how widespread this short attention span problem is,
it it's only a few for every million teenagers it's not a real
problem. But if it's widespread why not ban such websites? You can
say nanny state this or nanny state that but in the end those
teens need a bit of protection I just guess...
Lets go to the next
item.
Item
2) New math post is almost finished, it's mostly high school math.
On the other website
there is now a collection of about 260 posts, but the last one I
am working on must be one of the simplest of all math posts out
there. Now I say it's mostly high school math and yes that is
correct because we are just looking at a few quadratic
expressions. But of course in most countries on all high schools
they don't even get the ordinary complex numbers. Let alone those
fancy hyperbolic complex numbers that I am crafting lately.
In the new post I only
look at the set of (hyperbolic) complex numbers that you can't
divide by. Now for normal people that is only the number zero, you
can't divide by zero but there are many many math spaces where
there are non zero numbers that you can't divide by.
For example five
dimensional complex numbers also have five eigen values, as long
as not all eigen values are zero such a 5D complex number still
ain't zero. But you can't divide by it because it also has eigen
values that are zero. By the way if for some strange reason you
meet a math professor, never talk about eigen values of higher
dimensional complex numbers. That only destabilized their brains,
no you must simply ask: "Can all people do math or do you
need to be crazy in the first place?"
Now in the next
picture you see two complex numbers z1 and z2
and if you multiply them you get zero. Well that's all fine but if
you want to check it yourself you must use the rule i^2 = -1 +
3i. So it's a little bit different from the ordinary complex
plane that is ruled by i^2 = -1.
May be it is time to
get all this stuff to the biggest garbage can humanity has: The
internet. As always thanks for your attention.
(19 April 2024) The
two items for this update are:
Item 1) NATO on
Ukraine aid & who's talking on Russian state tv?
Item 2) One more picture with those four integrals.
Item 1) NATO on Ukraine aid & who's talking on Russian state
tv?
NATO chief Jens
Stoltenberg came out saying more or less that Ukraine aid should
not get cut because of making the NATO norm and enlarging the own
arsenals. I agree with that, most countries are spending more on
defense anyway and likely that will stay some time.
It's a bit weird to look at our own stockpiles and/or new weaponry
that is there for some vague accountancy 2% rule if that can be
used in Ukraine.
On the other hand like I remarked before; as a country you can't
give all away because you have a responsibility to your own
population too.
Take for example the
famous 155 mm artillery shells, countries that share a border with
Russia must of course have a much larger stockpile of those as say
in my own Dutch country. Anyway here is a quote from politico.eu:
"If allies face a choice between meeting NATO capability targets and providing more aid to Ukraine, my message is clear: Send more to Ukraine," he said, adding that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy would attend a NATO-Ukraine Council on Friday.
Source: NATO’s Stoltenberg asks allies to give air defense systems to Ukraine
Link used: https://www.politico.eu/article/nato-secretary-
general-jens-stoltenberg-asks-allies-give-air-defense-systems-
ukraine-russia-attacks/
Now we can look at a
nice picture of the NATO flag:
This weekend there is
a vote in the US congress on UA aid, so once more lets hope for
the best.
And in a somehow more
light subject; Who's talking on Russian state tv? Guess what? It
is Majorie Taylor Green! Now I've seen her a couple of times I
agree that indeed she is an attention seeker. Well I have zero
rights to criticize her because in our parliament we have our
Geert Wilders. And our Geert too often has trouble grasping
complicated things. For example before Brexit he thought that it
would be good for the Dutch economy to leave the EU and single
market. Oh oh Geert, you are such a nutjob...
CNN has a short video
out on the occasions where MTG is on Russian state tv. Now Majorie
pondered the question as why send weapons to those fascists in
Ukraine? And of course such wise questions will be applauded long
and hard on Russian state tv. I think they love her, may be she
should get her own show on tv over there.
If you want to see the
video, it is on the CNN website. This time I tried directly the
CNN website and skip Youtube, but you don't get less
advertisements. So the benefits of skipping Youtube are marginal
in this case. Anyway here's the thing:
Video title: Here's what Russian media is saying about Marjorie Taylor Greene's push to end Ukraine aid.
Link used: https://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2024/04/18/marjorie-
taylor-greene-russian-media-ebof-contd-digvid.cnn
Now of course I can't
say too much about all that US political stuff, it is lets say
internal stuff. But I hope that speaker Mike Johnson does not
loose his job because of this... Lets leave it with that and we go
to the next item.
Item
2) One more picture with those four integrals.
This will be the third
picture of the latest math post so it's all in all a bit over the
top. But there is not some form of autistic rule that says you
can't place more then two picture advertisements for new math
posts. No there isn't, beside that my advertisements are fun to
look at and that is not something you can say for that Youtube
stuff with all those ads during video's.
No magnetism rant this
week although today I observed US television physics professor
Brian Greene stating it was so wonderful that they have measured
the electron magnetic dipole moment to a degree of 12 decimals!
Well Brian, I agree that this is an astounding result especially
given the fact there is no fucking proof at all that electrons are
tiny magnets.
So no magnetic rant today, only repeating what Brain said and
remark he is a string theory kind of guy. That's a breed of
theoretical physics people that easily believe all kinds of weird
things. Weird things like the sum of all integers: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
5 etc equals -1/12.
Back to math and
neglect all that low IQ stuff that professional physics professors
think about magnetism, the beauty of these four integrals is not
in finding their precise value. The beauty lies in the fact you
can integrate at all on spaces like these 2D complex hyperbolic
numbers.
That was it for this
week, as always thanks for your attention.
(17 April 2024) Our
senate has voted to halt all gas extraction here in the province
where I live. So after 61 years no more gas from Groningen, this
is some long sought end to an era where all in all we locals did
not profit much from all that gas pumped out from under our feet.
Lets go to the two items for this update:
Item 1) UA aid goes
for a vote in the USA & a great Russian dam.
Item 2) And another hyperbolic complex number post.
Item
1) UA aid goes for a vote in the USA & a great Russian dam.
Today it emerged that
US house speaker Mike Johnson puts forward those foreign aid
bills, it is now separated into four pieces and the aid for
Ukraine is one of those pieces. It has been a long wait and
hopefully we will now finally have some clarity. All I can do is
hope that it will pass, as always hope a bit for the best while
prepare for the worst...
Anyway I selected a
video from Morning Joe from MSNBC because that was the video where
I heard the news for the first time. Click on the image to jump to
the video on Youtube:
Video title: Speaker Johnson unveils plan for funding Ukraine and Israel
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lskdoll9f0s
__________
Konstantin from the
channel Inside Russia was a bit angry again on all that
mismanagement inside Russia. And yes if I was a Russian citizen I
too would not like all that monkey stuff the Kremlin is doing year
in year out. Russia could have been a relative rich country but as
it goes over there decade in decade out, it an interesting mix of
weird stuff.
Here you see the first
dam that reportedly failed, as you see it is just a pile of loose
mud. I wonder what the engineers working for our Dutch so called
Waterstate think of such a technical marvel as that Russian dam...
It has to be remarked however that in my country we have hundreds
of kilometers of clay dykes to keep the river water out. And yes
those dams or dykes can become weak under certain conditions like
water saturation of such a dam or dyke. So what do you do in such
a case? As always we prepare for the worst while hoping for the
best.
And what did those Russians do? Well they prepared for nothing and
took another bottle of Vodka I just guess... Clcik on the image
for Konstantin his video:
Video title: Russians Are Left Behind As Catastrophic Flooding Intensifies.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-DaQ2bqCz4
Originally I planned
to write upon oil prices today but the Ukraine aid came along so
may be next update or next week or just never ever. Lets go to the
next item.
Item 2) And another hyperbolic complex number post.
Last week I finished
that latest math post on those interesting complex numbers that
don's work with circles or ellipses but with hyperboles. It's all
in all an amazing number of months I am only doing this kind of
relatively simple math. But I still like it and it is not boring
at all so why not scrape the barrel one more time?
The post is a bit
double in the sense I am now using integral calculus in order to
calculate that famous number tau on this space. For readers who
know a tiny bit about complex numbers, a number tau is a logarithm
of an imaginary unit. Because this is a plane I write that
imaginary thing as i and if you take the logarithm of it
you have found a number tau.
But I already
calculated that number tau in another manner, but I had a few not
so mathematical reasons to write this post anyway. One reason is
to write down the expression for the inverse, that is funny
because it looks just like the one the professional math
professors use on the complex plane but now you have nothing of
that norm stuff they so worship at the universities. And another
reason is that I wanted to show you that cute expression for a
complex number z and what happens if you multiply that
against it's conjugate? You can see that in the picture below, it
is directly related to the sum of the imaginary unit i and it's
inverse. This expression holds on an amazing amount of spaces,
anyway I could not find any kind of counter example so this is
more or less what it is: good math.
Title: Integrals for the number tau for the 2D multiplication defined by
i^2 = -1 + 3i.
For those who know a
bit of the complex plane: On the complex plane the inverse of i
equals minus i and as such on the standard complex plane
this reduces to that circle stuff like in x^2 + y^2.
__________
Ok it is time to wrap
up and close this update. I want to close with an old piece of
music from the 1980-ties. It is a cover of a piece of music or a
song known as The Sultans of Swing from the band the Dire
Straights. It's a cover of that old song and I found it very
refreshing. Not that the Dire Straights are a bunch of yeast
infected pussies, no of course not. They are still proud carriers
of the most important piece of meat there is in this universe: The
human male penis...
But serious, the old song was very good and I like this cover a
lot because it is a bit different. It is hard to say if it's
'better' because what defines precisely what 'better' is when it
comes to music? Sometimes it is very obvious, but saying that a
cover is 'better' as the original somehow does not ring a bell
over here.
Video title: Sultans of Swing (metal cover by Leo Moracchioli feat. Mary Spender).
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0RV0kgdqJU
Ok, lets try to get
this uploaded to the biggest garbage can humanity has: the
internet. As always thanks for your attention.
(12 April 2024) Two
items for this update:
Item 1) Great Russian
innovations & more UA stuff.
Item 2) Cute inversion formula & some crazy spin stuff.
Item
1) Great Russian innovations & more UA stuff.
I got a screenshot
from the Military & History channel of that wonderful Russian
tank. Now often Russian infantry rides on top of a tank or an armored
vehicle to the place where they are supposed to fight. But they
get often attacked with drones or other weaponry.
So a bunch of Russians modified a tank with metal sheets and they
were so proud on their labor that they posted it online. The
Ukrainians can read and soon figured out where the location was.
Anyway the tank is no longer...
It was made such that
infantry soldiers could hide under the metal
sheets.
Video title: Ukraine under Pressure - but fresh aid is coming! Ukraine-Russia War Situation Report.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlA941d45aU
__________
In another development
I saw that weird female Majorie Taylor Green stating that
organizations like the FBI and the justice department should have
their funding withdrawn because they investigate that smart and
wise fellow named Donald Trump... I think together with our Geert
Wilders they would make a perfect couple and with a bit of luck
our Geert will go to the USA and live happily ever after...
__________
Suchominus had another
satellite image of that ship that was damaged in the Baltic,
likely in Kalinigrad (I hope I spell it correctly). By all
standards it is still amazing if indeed it was an Ukrainian
action. I think the Russians don't mind because they have plenty
of ships left so what't the problem?
Remark it is not
utterly clear if indeed this is the Serpukhov, but it is indeed
very likely. Click on the picture for the short video:
Video title: Buyan-M Corvette Serpukhov Being Repaired at Kaliningrad After Ukrainian Sabotage.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BdrX2qlDgM
I had vaguely hoped
there would be a vote this week in the American congress but as
far as I know there is still a lot of republican infighting going
on. So as always we have to hope for the best while prepare for
the worst. It's a complicated situation, I understand that, but I
don't like it if so many Ukrainian soldiers die for only weird
political stuff...
Lets go to the next
item.
Item
2) Cute inversion formula & some crazy spin stuff.
I am almost ready with
a new post on those cute hyperbolic complex numbers. Here I use
integrals to calculate the number tau for that complex plane, that
is a bit double because a few posts back I did the same using
matrix diagonalization.
But I wanted to look
how those integrals looked and I also wanted to pen down how you
find the inverse on such a modified complex plane. The formula you
can see below looks just like finding the inverse on the complex
plane.
It's also a small
insult or a joke towards the math professors because they always
think that complex numbers have a strong relation with norms.
That's bullshit, the underlying mechanism is always determinants
on all spaces you can think of. It is just that in the standard
complex plane the math professors use, the determinant is the
square of the norm.
For example in the
picture below you see a z and a z with a line over
it, this z with a line over it is a so called conjugate.
And if you multiply them you get the equation of a hyperbole, the
joke of course is that there is no way you can turn that into a
norm. Of course I hope the math professors don't like the joke but
in practice I expect them not to read it. After all they won't get
extra funding for math like that nor can it be published in
standard math journals.
For myself speaking I
am glad you can use such a simple formula, ok ok you have to
figure out what the conjugate is and that is a job you must not
trust a math professor to do. But in higher dimensions say 3D or
4D complex numbers this just does not work, there it is always
much more difficult to find the inverse...
A tiny bit on electron
spin. I think electrons are magnetic monopoles just like they are
electric monopoles. Physics professors think that electrons are
tiny magnets that either align themselves with an applied magnetic
field or anti align themselves. How that works they never explain
but they themselves never have any problem with a 100% lack of
explanation. Just like they don't have any experimental evidence
that electrons are tiny magnets, why should it be a problem if
there is no evidence if they get billions of funding for say
quantum computing?
I wanted to show you
one of those dumb videos they have about quantum entanglement but
I could not find that video back on Youtube. It was one of those
video's where they have two electrons and if they separate them
and one goes to the Andromeda galaxy they claim that if you
measure the spin of the electron here on earth that somehow
influences the spin of the electron in the Andromeda galaxy. That
is the principle of non-locality and there are even Nobel prizes
handed out for that.
But if electron spin
is not a stupid tiny magnet but a permanent monopole charge, of
course you will find a strong correlation between such
measurements. All in all this Nobel prize committee is a true
elite in the sense it is hard to find another bunch of overpaid
snobs.
Lets not digress into
politics, in the picture below you see once more how these
weirdo's explain how two electrons with opposite spin have zero
magnetism. And these people are truly very very weird: the
electron is supposed to be a point particle with two magnetic
poles but that has NOT zero magnetism?
May be it is better to
end this update. As always thanks for your attention.
(10 April 2024) Here
are the two items for this update:
Item 1) UA stuff:
Russian ship in the Baltic sea damaged???
Item 2) Yet more on sequential Stern-Gerlach experiments.
Item
1) UA stuff: Russian ship in the Baltic sea damaged???
No idea how they did
it but Ukraine claims to have damaged a Russian ship in the Baltic
sea... There was some short video out where a fire started on that
ship and now it is seriously damaged. It would be great that in
the future nowhere on this planet Russian ships will be safe once
more demonstrating the stupidity of Putin when he started his
special military operation. So if it's all correct this Baltic sea
thing is indeed a very special thing...
And now Estonia came
out with the news they too found a million shells for Ukraine.
What I don't understand in this all is why Germany some time ago
had to report the million shells will be delivered much much
later. Ok, those were likely new shells but now time and again
countries coming out with hundreds of thousands found shells is a
bit weird in that context.
Of course a small country like Estonia can't pay for a million
shells but other countries will likely be very willing to get
shells to Ukraine in general and to the front line in particular.
UATV had a short video on this important detail, as always click
on the picture to land at the video:
Video title: Estonia Found a Million Shells for Ukraine! When Will They Deliver Them?
Link used:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paku4TD5MjU
In the USA the
political situation is still far from clear when it comes to the
Ukraine aid package. There is so much military hardware over there
that just isn't here in the EU so it's still very important.
For the first time I
dived a bit deeper into it and in the USA they seem to have a USA
version of our own Geert Wilders, you know that walking piece of
dogshit we have in our parliament. Her name is Majorie Taylor
Greene and according to some other republicans she is an attention
seeker.
She says weird stuff like: "If our constituents find out so
much aid is going to Ukraine they are just so mad" (Or words
of similar phrasing, I did't copy her exact words.) Well even if
that is the case, if those people are mad you Majorie have made
some serious blunder into explaining why this aid is important.
Now I understand there are some issues with border security over
there and yes most countries dislike it when there is just too
much illegal immigration.
May be this illegal
immigration causes some trouble here and there, may be a few extra
deaths but that's it. Yet among the UA army there are already
hundreds of extra soldiers dead because the aid from the USA
stopped six months ago.
It is reasonable
bordering on wisdom to classify Majorie Taylor Greene as a
attention seeking bag of acne. Why not? I have never seen such a
walking bag before except of course for our Geert Wilders. But now
I've seen a video of her she has indeed similarities with our bag
of dogshit Geert, it's mostly emotional talk without much deeper
stuff going on.
I wouldn't advice it
but below you can click on a link to a CNN video where you can see
her in full action. I didn't make a screen shot because I don't
want to damage my computer. Here is the link:
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene ramps up complaints against Speaker Johnson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHFglct31wg
But all in all it's a
complicated situation over there, that is why all those months I
never commented on it. It's to easy and cheap to blame it all on
speaker Johnson like so many commentators did.
As so often lets hope
for the best while prepare for the worst, but every day people die
for no reason at all and also troublesome: with more ammo more
Russian soldiers would be dead.
Item
2) Yet more on sequential Stern-Gerlach experiments.
Last week I showed you
the website of the Nobel prize committee explaining that there was
never ever a Nobel prize handed out for a so called sequential
Stern Gerlach experiment.
I considered it
important enough that yesterday I decided to write and extra post
on this detail over on the other website. Now why is it so
important that in one hundred years of time there is no sequential
experiment done that was successful?
Well if there was,
that would validate a basic principle of quantum mechanics that if
not measured quantum particles will always be in a super position
of states. And that is what present day people from the science of
physics use to build their quantum computers.
For say two decades
now those physics people try to make qubits based on electron
spin, the fact they don't succeed is no problem at all. They
always need more and more funding and of course once more they
won't succeed.
For the last decade I
myself tried to explain again and again that it is just not
logical that electrons are tiny magnets and it is very likely the
magnetic properties of the electron are just like the electric
properties: A permanent and monopole charge.
After nine or ten
years I can safely conclude that I have failed, logic does not
work with these people. That is strange because after all they are
supposed to be scientists, they get their salaries and laboratories
all from tax payer money. So shouldn't that make them a bit more
humble?
Of course not, these
people are also too stupid to understand say 3D complex numbers
and as such they are also too stupid to see all that is wrong with
electrons as tiny magnets.
For example these
weirdo's think of electrons as point particles, but if that is
true in that case almost by definition every electron must be
neutral under the application of magnetic fields.
This is absolutely not
what we observe in say the Stern Gerlach experiment from the year
1922.
Anyway it is time to
update my little rant and I just keep on pondering as why they are
so fucking stupid. If you click on the next picture that has
nothing to do with the post itself you will land on the other
website:
Title of the new post,
again the integrals above have nothing to do with it because they
are from the next yet unpublished post:
Nobel prize for a sequential Stern Gerlach experiment? Nope, nada, njet, nein & NEE!
Let me end this update
and why are physics people so stupid on this tiny electron detail?
Thanks for your attention and have a logical life or try to get
one.
(05 April 2024) Here
we go with the usual two items:
Item 1) NATO 75 years
old & the 100 billion proposal.
Item 2) Website Nobel prize says: No repeated SG experiments done
ever.
Item
1) NATO 75 years old & the 100 billion proposal.
Ha, all of a sudden
the NATO is 75 years old. I didn't see that one coming, at least
it was not on my mind at all. NATO has been a remarkable alliance,
the only time the article 5 was activated was after the 911
attacks. Given the timespan of 75 years that is amazingly little
war for so many countries.
And that's a bit of a
paradox: Simply because you're a NATO member, year in year out
there is no war and as such the tendency to spend less and less on
defense. If you click on the picture you land at a NATO HQ webpage
a bit describing how stuff went for those 75 years:
Then all of a sudden
there was this proposal, it's just a proposal right now, to create
a fund of say one 100 billion € and that fund is going to
Ukraine. It would be a multi year fund of five years so about 20
billion €/year.
The goal is to make
the aid to Ukraine a bit less of a political thing, if it's a NATO
commitment in that case member countries just have to follow suit.
So we won't come into a situation of say in my own country that
Geert Wilders becomes pm and from that position he starts to
hinder all UA aid as much as possible. And the big wildcard is of
course the USA elections at the end of this year.
Now how expensive is
such a fund? It sounds impressive and it is a lot of money but say
if that money would be coughed up by only EU citizens and there
are about 400 million of them. (Yes I know you should look at the
total population of the NATO members, but I am to lazy to look
that up.)
Well 20 bilion divided by 400 million is 50 € on average for
every citizen per year of funding. That means there is hardly any
borrowing needed for such a fund or borrowing needed at all.
At last I want to
remark that in the present situation it is often individual
countries that make a pledge to deliver something. For example
Germany and the Leopard tank stuff or air defense stuff and like
in the case of my country and Denmark do a bit on the F-16 stuff,
these countries now feel ownership of this because they are
sovereign and did choose themselves to do so.
It is just like in say a job; if you have to do something you are
fully committed to you will often go the extra mile while if you
must do stuff you don't support at all the attitude will be
completely different.
All in all it might be
wise to put the aid to Ukraine on a bit more distance from
volatile political emotional things, but it should not get to
centralized where a central command is micro managing all kinds of
details.
So all in all I think
this is worth pondering, lets go to the next item.
Item
2) Website Nobel prize says: No repeated SG experiments done ever.
Back in the year 1922
there was that famous experiment done known as the Stern-Gerlach
experiment. Later the results of that experiment were contributed
to electrons have a particular magnetic property know as spin.
Electron spin is
believed by physics professors as electrons being tiny magnets,
but they have no proof for that it is just a belief that just goes
unchallenged all the time year in year out.
I think it is bullshit
to think of electrons as tiny magnets with two magnetic poles. I
think the electrons have a magnetic charge so that they are
magnetic monopoles and as such this charge is just like the
electric charge: permanent and monopole.
Now with this
discovery of electrons having magnetic properties there is a whole
mathematical apparatus developed to describe it all, that is known
as spinors. And all that spinor nonsense says that often the
electrons are in a superposition of the two possible spin states.
And if you measure the electron spin this is always determined by
probabilities because that is the nature of quantum mechanics.
Needless to say I
think that is bullshit because the magnetic charge is permanent.
The spinor stuff also
says that if you repeat the spin measurement with a magnetic field
in another direction, you get that famous sine of half the angle
gives the probability. (Actually you must square it but bear with
me.)
Now if the in the last
century an experimental physics person would have performed a
successful repeated or sequential series of Stern-Gerlach
experiments, with almost 100% probability this person would have
gotten a Noble prize.
Ok ok, such a person
must be a university employee because the Nobel prize is one of
those prizes "For the elites and by the elites".
Anyway, such a Nobel
prize has never been handed out.
This week I finally
visited the website of the superior elites know as the Nobel prize
committee and guess what? They have a functioning search applet on
their very website...
So I did a few
searches, one search was just "Stern Gerlach" and that
returned 12 results. The second search was "Stern Gerlach
experiment" and that returned only 6 results.
Anyway it was just the
bag of rotten garbage as I expected: In a full century of time
there was never ever a sequential SG experiment done. I still
can't find it and now I am looking for about 10 years of time to
find that experiment...
If you want for
yourself you can check it out at the website of the elite of the
elite known as the Nobel prize committee. Click on the picture to
land at their home page and perform the search for yourself:
At last I want to
remark that likely all spinor stuff for photons is correct, may be
some details are not correct but all in all it looks ok. But
spinors for electron spin is totally one 100% bullshit just like
those Pauli matrices.
After all, the
electron is a magnetic monopole with a permanent magnetic charge.
Lets leave this update with that, as always thanks for your
attention.
(03 April 2024) Oh oh,
no intro talk not even on that juicy detail that it could have
been that RUSSIAN MONEY went to DUTCH POLITICIANS! No no no, no
intro talk.
Item 1) Next week more
clarity upon UA military aid? Plus oil & gas.
Item 2) New math post on those hyperbolic complex numbers.
Item 1) Next week more clarity upon UA military aid? Plus oil
& gas.
Today Shell was the
biggest climber on our stock market and yes oil prices were up one
more time. Lately there were some rumors about the USA asking
Ukraine to not attack Russian oil refineries and or other oil
installations. Well yes, oil prices or more precise gas prices for
the car are indeed a political thing over there.
May be there is some
wisdom to halt drone attacks on Russian oil installations if oil
goes above say 90$/barrel. And resume attacks when oil prices go
down under 90 dollar. After all if a Ukraine hater wins the next
US presidential elections, that will bring us from the rain into
the droplet.
And this 90 dollar is
a number I just suck out of my thumb, there is no advanced
analysis behind it or so. Another complicating detail with
stopping drone attacks for some time is that it gives the Russians
more time to come up with counter measures. For myself speaking I
just don't care or even encourage drone attacks regardless of the
oil price.
__________
I didn't save any
links but it could be next week the US military aid law goes for a
vote. (May be it isn't a law but just a proposal or so and only
later it will become law after signing by the POTUS). That could
fall all ways, there was even talk that the new speaker Mike
Johnson would come under attack from the MAGA's that ousted the
previous speaker.
So I can't comment on
it because I hardly know the details. Once more lets hope for the
best while prepare for the worst...
__________
There was a drone
attack on a drone factory in Tatarstan. You might say "so
what" because if such a drone downs a few bottles of Vodka
can't just anything happen?
But this is not some Vodka drinking Russian drone attacking other
Russian drones. And where have all those biolabs gone? Who knows?
But serious, the
distance from the border of Ukraine is over 1300 km so the range
of air drones like this keeps on going up. I don't know if it's
true but if the target range is below 1000 km it could hold now
300 kg of explosives?
An article from the
Financial Times on this drone detail:
Article title: Ukraine strikes Russian drone factory 1,300km from border.
Link used: https://www.ft.com/content/
72c497dc-c6f0-448c-ac92-5f8e43368534
And as the last link a
bit of upbeat news, we are leaving the winter in Europe with gas
storage at record highs. So that is a tiny miracle in itself, who
would have thought that just a short time ago.
But total storage is
as far as I know still far beyond one year of gas use. It's open
for debate of course how large in total gas storage must be in the
future. After all future geopolitical developments are often
completely unpredictable, therefore I would still argue for a bit
more storage capacity... Just like the USA has a strategic oil
reserve, so could be use some minimum gas reserve. Anyway here is
the news from oilprices dot com:
Europe Makes It To the Other Side of Winter With Record Levels of Natural Gas.
The link is a bit long so I don't copy it, let us now go to the
next item.
Item 2) New math post on those hyperbolic complex numbers.
A couple of days ago I
published the latest post on those cute hyperbolic numbers. It
amazes me that month in month out I don't pick up some other math
thing to think about, but I still like it and it's just a hobby so
why not?
The post is about
finding the so called complex exponential, this time it is a
hyperbole but a lot of people have seen a complex exponential.
That is that Euler stuff like e^it = cos t + i sin
t.
As you see in the
picture below, for the hyperbole here it is a bit more complicated
to cover it into it's two coordinate functions. But if you more or
less understand each and every crucial detail in it, it becomes a
beautiful thing.
And if you don't have
a fucking clue what all those math symbols mean, for you it is
just something to stare at. Just like I can stare at say a sheet
of Bach music and yes I understand that it's music but someone who
can actually read that stuff understands it all on a much deeper
level.
In the new post I was
happy to use the more or less "official definition" of
the exponential series. With 2D numbers like these hyperbolic ones
you can actually do this. But if in higher dimensions you have
found some number tau and of course you are proud on that, but
it's always so complicated you just can't use that formal
definition like in e^t = 1 + t + t^2/2!
+ t^3/3! + ... because that is just to complicated
for a small human brain like I have.
At the start of the
new post I express everything as much as possible into the easy to
understand sinh and cosh functions. At the end I more try to
express it into the eigenvalues of the beloved imaginary unit i
that rule the behavior of these hyperbolic complex numbers.
In case you are
interested into math like this, as always click on the picture and
you will land on the other website:
Title of the new math
post: Parametrization of the hyperbole where the multiplication is defined by
i^2 = -1 + 3i.
That was it for this
update, as always thanks for your attention.
(29 March 2024) No
intro talk, just two items:
Item 1) Ukrainian
stuff; is the USA aid finally moving? Lets hope for it.
Item 2) The adventures of electron chirality, it's unbelievable...
Item 1) Ukrainian stuff; is the USA aid finally moving? Lets hope
for it.
I didn't have the time
to flea carefully through the details but it could be that in the
USA parliament the aid to Ukraine will become a separate thing no
longer tied to all kinds of other political stuff. Well that would
be great because at least that will bring some clarity.
Furthermore bringing a vote forward does of course not mean that
UA aid package will be there, but a lot of American politics are
in favor of helping Ukraine.
So as always lets hope for the best while prepare for the worst.
At last I want to remark that it is now almost six months that the
UA goes without military aid from the USA. In my view they have
performed very well given all the shortages there are on the
Ukrainian battlefield.
So a compliment to the Ukraine military!
An opinion piece from
The Hill:
Title: Is Ukraine aid finally
moving? Link used:
https://thehill.com/opinion/4561082-is-ukraine-aid-finally-moving/
__________
The video channel
Military & History had a bit more about the famous Chech
shells. It could be I was wrong and this time I really hope I was
wrong with stating that likely only the funding was there and no
real artillery shells.
Anyway it is claimed
that already before June a significant number of artillery shells
could go and be shipped to Ukraine. And may be it is a good thing
if not all details are constantly in the news. Just like Germany
delivered a few times air defenses without much noise around that.
After all the Russians read the news too (although sometimes I
wonder if that really makes a difference...)
Below you see an
anti-tank work in the making. Click on the picture to land at the
video from the Military & History channel:
Video title: Ukraine War Situation Report.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYuGKl677Jk
Lets go to the next
item.
Item
2) The adventures of electron chirality, it's unbelievable...
I was looking at a
video from Sabine with the funny title "Do we have evidence for new physics?".
In the video the left and right handiness of electrons came along
and that's why I decided to pick this video from Sabine
Hossenfelder. It is important to know that Sabine believes all
that stuff about electron spin is true; it's a tiny magnet because
of reasons or as so often: Not because of reasons, it's just a
tiny magnet.
In my little world
where I reject the idea that electrons are tiny magnets (because
for example they are not neutral under application of magnetic
fields as a true bipolar point particle magnet would be), the
concept of what physics people refer to as electron chirality is
just horrible.
I view electrons as
magnetic monopoles because that makes a lot more sense and you
have much less of that stuff that goes like "If you think you
understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum
mechanics". Let me give you an example with electric
charges:
If a proton files
towards a positively charged metal plate, that proton is left
handed. If a proton flies away from a positive plate in that case
it is right handed.
Hopefully you see why
I think electron chirality is just fucking stupid: In the proton
example the proton goes towards the metal plate because it had
enough initial velocity in that direction. That proton will either
slam into the plate or slow down, stop and go back due to the
electric charge on that metal plate.
The way the physics
people view it, it has to do with the direction of the tiny magnet
or the spin of the electron and the direction the electron moves.
So once more there is
a magnetic field and once more instead of the tiny electron
magnets aligning themselves with that magnetic field, they also
anti-align themselves. Anyway that is what the physics people make
of it...
And that is one of the
many energy problem I have with the version of low IQ people too
stupid to understand stuff like 3D complex numbers. Not that I
consider myself being very smart but if I smell rotten logic my
simple and small human brain would like a bit more clarity. And
not that rotten weird logic from the physics people.
After all where does the electron gets it's energy from to
anti-align itself with that applied magnetic field? Even the
Sabina's of this world never ever dive into stuff like
that...
It has to be remarked
however that Sabine had a very very good observation upon the behavior
of the professional physics professors: If the professors have
found a tiny patch of math that actually works to describe a
particular physics thing, they always hold on that patch of math
too long and try it out in all kinds of other physics.
That is why in my
house I hold Sabine in a high esteem despite she believes that
crap of electron being tiny magnets. After all if she would say
that likely electrons are not tiny magnets, that's instantly the
end of her career...
But Sabine is right:
The Gauss law for magnetism is just a piece of math. It is very
good math and you can say it is a perfect piece of math because
after all it's from Gauss. But if electrons are magnetic
monopoles, Gauss or no Gauss, that kind of math simply
crashes.
The video is about
seven months old, if you see all the weird stuff about left and
right handiness they do with all kinds of particles it is very
clear my own view on electrons as magnetic monopoles
will meet stiff resistance. But that is just some social stuff,
since I am not a member of that weird collection of people knows
as physics people it is not much of a hinder to me.
Here is the video, as always click on the picture to see it:
Video title: Do we have evidence for new physics?
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZgyFghqkHg
A wiki on electron
chirality / helictiy / left-right handiness is here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chirality_(physics)
More or less I do not
expect to get any validation of the physics community about my
views on electron magnetic monopole charge versus their strange
idea's upon electron spin.
After all electron
carrying magnetic charges that are permanent is not compatible
with the idea that if you understand quantum mechanics you don't
understand quantum mechanics...
I think it's more like
"If you think you understand humans, you don't understand
humans". They are just not logical...;)
Lets leave it with
that and as always thanks for your attention.
(27 March 2024) No
intro only two items:
Item 1) Russian terror
attacks & cute Black Sea bingo card.
Item 2) Eigenvalues as entries of eigenvectors of an imaginary
unit.
Item
1) Russian terror attacks & cute Black Sea bingo card.
The very first hours
after such a terror attack are often important: Officials will
often be honest in their first reaction and as such you can learn
a lot of what they perceive as the enemy.
For example about
twenty years back there were those backpack attacks in trains in
Spain. Ten backpacks loaded with explosives stolen from a mine
somewhere and left behind in the trains. About 200 or something
more dead. The very first thing the Spanish government of that
time did was blaming the Basks for it.
The Basks had nothing to do with it but it gave an interesting
insight in what they were really thinking.
In that regard is how
you must view the idea's of the Kremlin Putina, the Putina said a
few times that the perpetrators were going to Ukraine. And fast on
top of that there would be made an opening in the border and after
that they would be welcomed as heroes...
You can't make it up,
it is 100% from crazyland but for a few years already I think
Putin is mentally ill and has a very limited grasp on
understanding what is real and what are his fatasies.
Another interesting
detail is that the Americans have warned a few days before the
attacks that there could be a serious coming. The Putina stupid
and arrogant as he is dismissed the whole thing once more pointing
to that he has a limited understanding of what is real and what is
made up.
I selected a video
from Konstantin from the channel Inside Russia because he has been
in that Crocus building a few times. He even claimed there was a
police station inside that very building. The video is about 21
min long and as always click on the picture to land at the video:
Video title: Terror In Moscow: KGB's Biggest Fail
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zd_daLQBvWk
It took a relatively
long time for police to react on the terror attack, a few people
explained this via remarking that such stuff like police is almost
totally geared to protecting the Russian government. As such
protecting the public takes a back seat or isn't done at all. I
agree with that observation, as Konstantin from the video remarks:
If you hold a blank piece of paper above your head (the way of
protesting over there in Russia) you are arrested in 30 seconds.
Well may be it's a bit longer as 30 seconds, but Russian police
loves it to crack down hard on unarmed protestors while if they
are dealing wit more dangerous folks the cowards had better things
to do.
Now have I any
comments of that guy with his ear cut off or the one who's genitals
got electrocuted? I think that part of the story is what Putin
always refers to as "Traditional family values". What
else should it be? Well all jokes sick or not aside, this too is
the initial reaction that is good to observe. It shows how it goes
over there when they get a bit emotional...
__________
At Suchominus I found
another bingo card, this one is about the Black Sea fleet. There
were reports of two more ships hit but as far as I know now none
of them are promoted to submarines. It could be one of the ships
was missed by a feet or more but again I do not know more details
now. It is just I wanted a new bingo card because they are
funny:
The bingo card once
more demonstrates how stupid the Kremlin Putina is because most of
the losses of the Russian navy were caused after the Kremlin did
withdraw from the grain deal.
I got pissed and angry
about that and a lot more people did and as such the Russian
Black Sea fleet gets smaller and smaller. Once more, this Putin
guy is just too stupid to understand the dynamics of
war.
Lets go to the next
item.
Item
2) Eigenvalues as entries of eigenvectors of an imaginary unit.
Four days ago I posted
a new math post on the other website. Click on the picture below
if you are interested. Actually the post is about finding another
number tau, this time in a 2D space of hyperbolic complex numbers.
These numbers tau are always the logarithm of a suitable imaginary
unit (suitable means they must have a determinant of 1) and if you
have found such a number tau you can make a complex exponential
with that.
This time I used the
method of diagonalization of the 2x2 matrices involved and in this
post I wanted to highlight that often (or better always) the
eigenvalues often appear in the entries of the eigenvectors.
Using that insight can save you a ton of work, in this case you
can use the so called characteristic equation to your advantage.
Below you see the lambda^2 equation for this problem and you can
use that to break down the square into a linear combination.
So it's all not deep
math but as simple as possible because we have 2x2 size matrices.
I once solved this kind of problem for a 7x7 matrix and before I
fully developed this matrix diagonalization way I solved it for a
5x5 matrix. For myself the 5x5 matrix was one of the hardest math
problems I ever solved because I did not have my diagonalization
stuff at the time and had to find the number tau on pure brain
power.
As always click on the
picture to land at the new post that is now about 4 days old. You
are not allowed to apply Russian traditional family values on my
new born math baby.
Post title: The number tau for the hyperbolic multiplication
i^2 = -1 + 3i.
Link used: https://3dcomplexnumbers.net/2024/03/23/the-number-tau-
for-the-hyperbolic-multiplication-i2-1-3i/
Now last week I wrote
that official math professors don't study stuff like elliptic or
hyperbolic 2D number systems. But was I correct? I found an old
wiki back that I must have read many years ago and in there you
find some rudimentary stuff on such number systems.
The reason I want to
show you this rather boring wiki is that it is for all to see that
the professional math professors only do the square of imaginary
units...
Yes, for say 150 years
they only do that. May be that is one of the reasons my 3D complex
numbers just don't ring any doorbell over there. They can only do
square, for the rest it's all brain dead but still receiving a fat
money paycheck known as the salary.
Here's the wiki, don't waste your time on it because it's only
square deep:
Wiki title: Hypercomplex number
Link used: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercomplex_number
The title is
completely over the top but that is how it goes over there in math
land. That was it for this update, thanks for your attention and
never forget to pay some extra attention to the way officials
react when there is a terror attack...
(22 March 2024) Two
items for today:
Item 1) Kajsa Ollongren
visiting UA & Anders Puck on sea drones.
Item 2) Math: What happens if elites give prizes to other elites?
Item 1) Kajsa Ollongren visiting UA & Anders Puck on sea
drones.
Our minister of
defense Kajsa Ollongren was on a two day visit to Ukraine. I could
not find it back but at some point in time the Ukrainians asked if
military aid could suddenly stop or words like that.
Of course I cannot
give any guarantees but I will try and explain a bit how politics
works over here. First look at my photo from the previous update
upon our latest elections, as you see we always have many
political parties. As such we always have coalition governments
with mostly over two political parties. As far as I know the only
political party that is against military aid to Ukraine is the PVV
lead by that walking piece of dogshit named Geert Wilders. You
know the guy that likes to ban the Koran and stuff like that, he's
a total idiot.
In my country it is
very common that a new government does not change policies set in
place by previous governments. So it is not like binary political
systems like the UK or the USA. For example when Donald Trump
became president one of the first things they did was deleting all
stuff related to man made climate change from the web servers of
the White House. Stuff like that is never done over here.
Furthermore because we
always have coalitions inside the cabinet they will vote every now
and then over new policies. My estimate is that stopping military
aid will be voted away. It is also very likely that this walking
piece of dogshit will not become our new pm furthermore lowering
the likelihood of less military aid.
There could be a
future problem with the F-16's if the Donald gets elected again
because the F-16's were made in the USA. That is a big wild card
so all we can do is hope for the best while preparing for the
worst..
Below you see our
defense minister on her visit to UA, click on the picture for a
short Reuters report on the stuff:
Title: Dutch providing Ukraine with F-16 ammunition, drones, minister says.
Link used: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/dutch-providing-ukraine-
with-f-16-ammunition-drones-minister-says-2024-03-20/
As far as I know now
Denmark will start delivering F-16's this summer and we will
follow in the autumn.
Lets go to the video
of today, Anders Puck had an interesting analysis of why sea
drones are so hard to take out. The sobering news is that it's not
massive Vodka consumption but an interesting mix of radar
limitations, waves and drone visibility.
I found it very
interesting, here is the title & link:
Why are maritime drones so hard to
beat?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QX68_FZl8UE
Item
2) Math: What happens if elites give prizes to other elites?
There was a new Abel
prize (for math) out, the Abel prize is a recent thing and you can
compare it to the Nobel prizes for other sciences.
It is no secret that
rich organizations like that are very unhelpful when it comes to
understanding it is very hard for a point particle like an
electron to be a magnetic dipole.
For example the Nobel
prize committee just as easily hands out their prizes of nutjob
physics professors who are basically too stupid to understand the
problems there are with electrons being tiny magnets.
For about nine years I
am writing on that detail from physics and just nothing happens.
What can explain stuff like that?
You must not see
universities as places where people just relentlessly try to
improve on scientific knowledge. You must much more compare it to
say a medieval palace household with all it's palace intrigues.
Females cheating on their husbands if that can improve their
social standing, husbands fucking lower ranked maids and so on and
so on.
Compare it to say Richard Feynman fucking so many of this female
students, it has nothing to do with science just exploiting the
position you have.
Universities are more
or less elite places that are run by elites for elites. Ok ok
every now and then they do some science, I will not deny that. But
there's always tons and tons of emotional stuff going on that also
hinders simple scientific progress.
Just an example:
Because my social rank is rather low, simply because of that I am
getting ignored to the bone. That goes for 3D complex numbers
where this ignorance goes on for about 33 years and lately the
idea that electrons being magnetic monopoles is just not picked
up.
To the excuse of
university employees I can say that also for them it will be next
to impossible to do experiments about electron monopole magnetism
and on top of that it will be very hard to get any kind of
publication into that direction. Furthermore they live in a
'publish or perish' kind of culture so it does not add value to
their career if they try to get rid of that nonsense known as
electron spin.
Qubits based on
electron spin that just don't work after 30 years? The university
people will always have another lame excuse of why it does not
work.
Another complicating
factor is that science is humans working together, so you must
conform to the idea's that define or make up a particular science.
If you don't do that you run into trouble and it's just bad for
your career. If you challenge the idea that monopoles do not exist
and state that almost all matter is composed of magnetic
monopoles, your career will be dead.
But lets go to the
Abel prize, it was weird to see Matt Parker dressed up like he was
some elite guy just doing his elite thingelings. The video of the announcement
is about 30 minutes long. As always click on the picture to land
at the video:
Video title: The Abel Prize announcement. March 20, 2024
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aaGUSSjMbI
At about 18 minutes
into the video Matt tells us that higher dimensions are 'very
mysterious'. As an example he does the sphere packing thing and
yes on the surface it looks mysterious: How can such a giant
sphere fit into a unit cube of higher dimensions?
But if you analyze it,
all mystery melts away soon. For example take all the corner
points of a 10 thousand dimensional unit cube. You can find corner
points that have a distance of 1 to each other. There are corner
points with a distance of square root 2 and so on and so on until
you find the maximum distance in such a cube to be the square root
of 10 thousand...
The Abel prize winner
Michel Talagrand is also very good at understanding electron spin.
They must be tiny magnets and as such he likely has done some math
into that direction of idea's. And guess what? He got another fat
financial prize while in his own words he already had a 1.2
million other math prize!
What more do you want?
Universities are run by elites for elites, but my dear and
overpaid Michel does that make electrons really tiny magnets?
And to answer the
question posed in the title of this item: What happens if elites
give prizes to other elites? Rather simple: Nothing.
Let's leave it with
that & as always thanks for your attention.
(20 March 2024)
Normally when I avoid all things Google, after an evening of web
surfing I have at most one hundred trackers. But on days that I
update this website I often use Youtube and Google News, on those
days it's more like 400 to 500 trackers. And not to mention all
those cookies you get for free, often it is just unclear what use
there is in those cookies & trackers. So over the years the
company that once had the motto "Do no evil" has become
a very skilled parasite. It's a pity but for the time being I
still avoid that Google stuff...
Lets go to the two items of today:
Item 1) Ramstein
meeting, a bingo card and a few remarks.
Item 2) Good math video found on the 3D circular numbers.
Item
1) Ramstein meeting, a bingo card and a few remarks.
Lets not waste time on
those Russian "elections". There was a new Ramstein
meeting but I did not any time to flea through the details. But I
observed the US SECDEF making a few remarks and I want to say I
agree with them. If Putin is not stopped in Ukraine, he will go
after other countries. That's the mental illness of the guy. For
example lately we had the Tucker Carlson interview and the Putina
told us that he was not interested in say a country like Poland...
Well I think if he had a proper strong army, he would already be
in Portugal by now.
On a video channel
named Ukraine Matters I came across a funny bingo card, I have to
say those drone attacks were impressive and now the news is that
Russia will bring air defense to refineries...
I don't link to the
video of Ukraine Matters because the guy thinks that there are
actually hundreds of thousands of artillery ammo shells found. No
that reporting is very misleading, it's just the funding for it.
Now of course this is all rather important, as far as I know
Russia fires about 10 thousand shells a day and Ukraine because of
the shortage only 2 thousand...
In case you want to
read it, here is a text from Zelenskyy and in it is says actually
funding for the artillery shells:
https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-ato/3842137-zelenskyy-on-ramstein
-there-will-be-new-defense-packages-including-scarce-artillery.html
Lets close this item
with a photo I made from our last elections, as you see we do not
have much of a two party system over here like in the USA or the
UK. That's why it always takes so long to form a new government
and as such our so called caretaker government always still have a
lot of work to do even after elections...
Ok, lets go to the
next item.
Item
2) Good math video found on the 3D circular numbers.
By sheer coincidence I
came across that video on 3D circular numbers, the guy from the
channel names them tripex numbers. In about 33 years of time I
know that kind of math, I have never seen such a good video on
it.
He comes amazingly
far, a good matrix representation, factorizing the determinant.
The video guy has good technical math skills, he does not bounce
back from more complicated calculations. To be honest this is one
of the more skilled people I have seen over the last 33 years.
But as always, taking
the conjugate goes horribly wrong. He sees for himself that taking
a conjugate as simple are replacing some + signs by a - sign goes
wrong. And he does not stop there, he jumps to the conclusion it
has to be related to the determinant. I have seen that kind of
reasoning before but the determinant is just not good as some kind
of norm.
I think he is a math
hobbyist just like I am, he is not as stupid as the average math
professor when it comes to complex numbers but he names the stuff
an N-function. Dear video guy, the N stands for
norm.
The video is about 40
minutes long and for my brain the calculations don't go to fast
but if you are new to that kind of stuff it might go a bit fast
all in all. As always click on the picture to land at the video
from a company that once had a motto "Do no evil":
Video title: Let's Invent the Triplex Numbers
(Channel: Casual Graphs)
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvI7dGXFgm8
By sheer coincidence
just two posts ago on the other website I explained a bit more on
how to find the conjugate on other spaces as just the complex
plane. In case you want to read that nerdy stuff, here is a link:
Comparison of the conjugate on five different
spaces.
In other developments
I finished writing a new post on 2D hyperbolic complex numbers.
The math professors only have a hyperbolic plane and we keep it
better that way. Those folks are beyond repair when it comes to
complex numbers and it all know you shouldn't make fun of mentally
handicapped people...
I am now halfway or so
into turning it into pictures, the post is about finding the
number tau for those hyperbolic numbers. And a number tau is
always the logarithm of a suitable imaginary unit. This time I use
the method of matrix diagonalization so it is a bit different
compared to when I used those integrals for an elliptic 2D
multiplication.
But if you have such a
number tau, you must also have some parametrization of the
hyperbole involved. That's for the math post after the present one
that still is in preparation. I already showed you all that sine
hyperbolic stuff in the previous update, but in the picture below
I use a different eigenvalue of the imaginary unit i.
Eigenvalues of
imaginary units? Math professors will never ever do stuff like
that. No they waste their time into large research groups that are
only formed because in that way all participants get more
publications on their name. It's a consequence of the 'publish or
perish' culture.
What use is there into
writing as much publications as possible if that only dilutes the
value of the content? Anyway here is the cute hyperbole stuff:
Yeah yeah, a complex
exponential that is a hyperbole.
Lets leave it with
that and as always thanks for your attention.
(15 March 2024) Well
well well, may be there is a bit of good news from the front of
politics; very likely in my own country that nutjob named Geert
Wilders will not become a pm. Likely that means the military aid
to Ukraine is unhindered by weird political stuff in the next few
years. But politics are politics so most of the time all you can
do is hope for the best while preparing for the worst... Two items
for today:
Item 1) More attacks
on Russian oil facilities.
Item 2) More on those hyperbolic complex numbers ruled by i^2
= -1 + 3i.
Item
1) More attacks on Russian oil facilities.
It seems that Russia
had a bunch of helicopters in the air above the occupied
territories while Ukraine launched a lot of drones. So the
Russians hardly could use their air defenses because otherwise
their own helicopters could get hit.
Below I have a video
from France 24 English where it is claimed that according to
Bloomberg in the last attacks from this week we already have about
12% or Russian refinery capacity offline...
The Russians claimed
to have shot down 65 of the impending drones, hard to say how
accurate that number is because the Russians live in a society
where people love good news over bad news. Just like when they
tell each other that 44 HIMARS systems are destroyed, the more
good news there is the better it is over there.
I have no idea exactly
what the most easy way is to attack Russian oil refineries. The
best stuff is of course the things they can't repair or
replace without outside knowledge and oil technology. But a drone
in say a distillation column is likely a pain in the ass for the
local oil refiner.
And the Kremlin they
can't complain because those weirdo's started the whole stuff of
attacking energy infrastructure. Everybody complained but the
arrogant shitholes kept on attacking Ukrainian energy
infrastructure. The combination of a relative dumb Putina combined
with much to much arrogance is not something that will turn the
war into Russia's favor fast.
I am not sure but it
could be a distillation column burning in the picture below. A
funny detail is that Russian civilians themselves make video's of
such attacks and place them online... As far as I know there are
about one hundred refineries in Russia, of course other smaller
refineries can compensate a bit for the recently lost production
capacity. So may be the Bloomberg estimate is a little bit too
high but it has to be remarked that Bloomberg is a reliable news
outlet.
Click on the picture for the France 24 video:
Video title: Russia reports Ukrainian drone strikes on targets deep inside its territory and a border incursion.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcMCNM-pNd0
Also interesting is
that those border crossings into Russia keep on going. At first I
expected a few hit and run attacks, or raids as known in military
jargon, but I've also seen footage of Russians waving the white
flag. And after that it's Russians who take Russians as prisoners
of war because it's more or less forbidden that Ukrainians take
part in such attacks. After all that is more or less the condition
for military aid and yes it can be frustrating but I too adhere to
that.
If countries giving
military aid to Ukraine want that border condition, it is what it
is. Anyway it's time to go to the next item so once more I wish
the Ukrainians luck with staging more and more complicated
attacks.
Item
2) More on those hyperbolic complex numbers ruled by i^2 = -1 +
3i.
I upgraded the picture
from Tuesday a little bit so even people with limited knowledge of
complex numbers can understand a bit better what I try to do.
What I want to do is
finding a way with that thing named f(t) to go through
integer points in the plane when the variable t is also an
integer. This f(t) is known under the name parametrization and
that means it covers a thing, in this case one blade of a
hyperbole.
The interesting detail
is that through every integer point in the plane there goes one of
those hyperboles. For example in the picture below I did choose
the point (5, 5) that represents the complex number z = 5 +
5i.
All you have to do is
calculate what x^2 + 3xy + y^2 is, here with x and y both being 5
it is 125 in total. So that's what you feed the DESMOS graphing
package and voila you have a perfect pair of two hyperbole
blades.
If you multiply any
integer point on such a hyperbola with the imaginary unit i,
you always get the next integer point on that same hyperbola. But
instead of taking just one step at a time (using the number i)
you can also multiply any integer point with that f(t)
thing.
And if you do that,
for example f(3) will bring you 3 steps further on the hyperbole.
Or f(-2) brings you two steps back. It more or less 'rotates' over
the hyperboles where in the ordinary complex plane all stuff done
with multiplication by i gives rise to rotation along a
circular path.
I will not deny that
this f(t) thing looks a bit complicated but in math just
like in war it is what it is. Only in math there are much less
attacks on Russian oil facilities...
Hopefully you are not
one hundred % confused by the next picture that by the way takes a
lot of time to make. Every piece of text or symbols are a layer in
my graphics program, but it is nice work to do.
It has to be remarked
that just like in the case with ellipses, there could be
integer points in the plane not covered by my f(t) thing.
For example if you look at the ellipse x^2 + xy + y^2 = 91, there
are 24 integer point solutions but any f(t) thing
goes round over 6 integer points so I have to use four of my
f(t) things to get all integer points on that ellipse...
Life sucks, I know I
know. May be it is time to split and thanks for not being brain
dead right now so I can say thanks for your attention.
(13 March 2024) No
intro talk only two items:
Item 1) A boatload of
news related to Ukraine.
Item 2) A cute hyperbole that is in fact a complex exponential.
Item 1) A boatload of news related to Ukraine.
Just a grab out of all
that news surrounding or related to the war in Ukraine:
1) Flag raising
ceremony at HQ of NATO.
2) Czechnia 800.000 shells for Ukraine?
3) Drone attacks on oil facilities in Russia.
4) At three places UA tanks crossed the border with Russia.
5) And so on and so on...
Of course I am not a
NATO employee but once more a welcome for Sweden. It's now all
official as far as I know, may be burning a few less Korans or may
be non at all is better. (But I live in a country where a guy that
tries to become the pm would like to ban the Koran, the guy Geert
Wilders is a deep nutjob so we'll see how Dutch politics will evolve
over time...) As you see the flag raising ceremony was a pretty
sober one with just a few attendees, but it's an important symbol.
DW reporting:
Last week it emerged
that Czechnia in some mysterious way had found 800.000 shells and
it was rumored it costs about 1.5 billion. At the time I did not
want to comment on it because 1.5 billion € for 800.000 is less
than 2000 € per artillery shell.
Present prices are much higher due to the shortage, I don't know
exact or average numbers but it's easily 2 or 3 times as
expensive. But all kinds of countries are standing behind the
proposal of Czechnia so who knows?
From four days back this news, from politico.eu:
Czech Republic backtracks on finding cash to buy 800,000 shells for Ukraine.
But 300.000 shells
would be possible, yet today we have this news from Pravda:
Czechia finds 200,000 more artillery shells for Ukraine
Likely it's only the
funding, these are as far as I now understand it not already made
artillery shells. But who knows if there are stockpiles here and
there that likely never will be used and as such could also go to
Ukraine...
__________
A good drone spanking
was also delivered today with all those attacks on Russian oil
facilities. Russia has now cut down oil production by about one
million barrels a day and that is about double they would do
related to OPEC trying to keep oil prices high. So the OPEC cuts
and cuts related to Ukrainian drone attacks give not a sharp
picture but likely the attacks on oil facilities do their work.
Lets not forget Russia itself started attacking UA energy
infrastructure so they can not complain. (Of course they will
complain but anyway.)
Please remark now all
foreign oil companies have left Russia it is much harder for
Russia to repair the stuff, so it makes sense to stage much much
more of these attacks...
On three places
Ukrainian tanks crossed the border into Russia. The tanks are not
manned by Ukrainians but those Russians that want to get rid of
that piece of shit now sitting in the Kremlin.
The Putin wants to get
reelected and likely the Russians will vote as they are told. But
for a guy that more or less planned this war for a period of 10
years, what was supposed to be a 3 day operation in now into it's
third year. I would not vote for such a dumb form of asshole
life.
__________
And so on and so on,
for example the seizure of the 285 billion $ of Russian reserves
hanging in bank accounts around the world is a bit closer. Right
now those accounts are only frozen but every person understands
that 285 billion $ is a significant amount. Yet from the legal
point of view it is all rather complicated but I am in favor of
it.
Yeah yeah Kremlin crybabies, why don't you make a bit more noise
on this detail so I can once more completely neglect what you have
to say.
Lets go to the next
item.
Item
2) A cute hyperbole that is in fact a complex exponential.
I was just trying to
write a new math post on finding a so called number tau for a
complex plane that is not ruled by i^2 = -1 as most people
know but by i^2 = -1 + 3 i.
Now after you have
found such a beautiful number tau that is always the logarithm of
one of the imaginary units, you are more or less supposed to give
a good parametrization of the thing because otherwise what is the
fucking use of your new found number tau?
So while working on my
number tau stuff I became afraid that may be this time I would not
be able to find such a parametrization. In case you do not have a
clue what I am talking about, think of that good old Euler thing
that says: e^ it = cos(t) + isin(t), that is
one of those parametrizations.
But I have to cover a
hyperbole and I had never done that before. And instead of neatly
writing all the stuff out I decided to directly pen down the
answer because after all it's just a bunch of cosine and sine
hyperbolic functions or not?
So a day later I put
my brilliant parametrization into the DEMOS graphic machinery and
guess what? It's not correct, yes it covers the hyperbola but it
has some overshoot. That was horrible because now I did not have
that relationship between integers like -1, 0, 1, 2 and the
integers from this 2D complex plane.
Well it was easy to
repair but it will be more difficult where I made my giant mistake
or mistakes. It must be a minor thing because the parametrization
eats the hyperbola like it is some form of math sex.
If you are still not
crazy, look below. I was thinking that this a was precisely one,
but it's not. It's that ln thing that is in fact the logarithm of
one of the eigenvalues of my precious number i.
So I have to work out
all this messy stuff before I can post the new number tau and
later post the parametrization.
This all more or less
shows that writing math is also often a messy process while if I
post the end results I always do like it was all clean and shiny
from day one...
If I look at the
clock, I think it is time to split and let me try to upload this
to the internet. Thanks for your attention.
(08 March 2024) That
was some weird experience: I copied some files on a USD data stick
and bam! The whole thing does not work anymore. About 59 GB of
data gone, but it's no problem because I have everything double
except for the last 40 files or so. I more or less considered data
sticks to be a safe storage of data, for about as long as they are
there I have never ever had only one problem and now all of a
sudden it dies like an old rotating hard disk... So I have to
rework my archive routine...
Item 1) The Sergey
Kotov promoted to submarine.
Item 2) Why not two stacks of neodymium magnets?
Item 1) The Sergey Kotov promoted to submarine.
The channel Reporting
From Ukraine had a good video out on the sinking of the Sergey
Kotov. If it all has unfolded like is told in the video, it is
indeed a fairly complex attack. The big problem is that weirdly
enough Russians seem to think about doing stuff that makes their
ships harder to sink!
Now I haven't tried it
but if you try typing in an internet search engine the phrase
"Russians thinking" and you likely get the suggestion
"Russians thinking where is my bottle of Vodka?". The
Russians are much much smarter as I ever anticipated, for example
they keep their war ships in ports that are outside of the range
of the Storm Shadow boom stuff.
That is totally ridiculous!
The UK & France don't deliver that flying boom stuff for
nothing, the Russians are supposed to hold on to their part of the
deal: Letting Ukrainians sink Russian ships with Storm Shadow boom
stuff.
But serious, I found
the video interesting so click on the picture if you want to see
it for yourself:
Video title: FLAWLESS EXECUTION. Ukrainians CATCH & DESTROY A HUGE WARSHIP.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zF0w0F3LR8Q
__________
Of course a lot more
did happen, for example the expansion of NATO is now formalized
with Sweden as it's latest member. And the Czech Petr Pavel came
out also stating a willingness for having boots on the ground in
Ukraine...
May be that's a good
idea, may be it's a bad idea because can it destabilize the scale
of the war? On the one hand the Russians now only have one front,
the one in Ukraine. What would happen if they have to fight on
different fronts if in the meantime their entire railroad
infrastructure gets bombarded away? It's all hard to say but I
agree with those politicians that say we must not fear Russia for
no reason at all.
Lets go to the next
item.
Item
2) Why not two stacks of neodymium magnets?
Two days ago I showed
you my latest post on the other websites where I briefly went into
experiments where the applied magnetic field is into the direction
of the electron beam.
Now in that post on
the other website I mentioned four different kind of experiments
you can do with narrow and wide magnetic fields and narrow and
wide electron beams. For example my 12€ black and white old
television is a wide electron beam.
In all experiments of
course the goal is to separate all electron beam stuff into two
different ones using magnetism.
But yesterday I
thought of another cute way of splitting the electron beam in two
beams: Simply use two stacks of neodymium magnets.
I have no idea about
the costs, I bought my own first stack of magnets a long time ago
and at the time it was about 50€. In the meantime we had a lot
of inflation so may be two stacks are now around 130€.
Furthermore you must
have some way of making an electron beam, that can be a beautiful
expensive glass tube as above or a worn out old oscilloscope that
has a tube with an electron beam in it.
All in all it's just a
few hundred Euro's and you can stay far far away from the
university people that believe in electrons are tiny magnets and
as such if the electron beam splits it has to be that these
electrons anti-align themselves. And more of that academic crap
when it comes to magnetism, these people are mostly shallow
thinkers only interested in the number of publications they have
made and their ranking order among their peers.
At the universities
they play a lot of ego games and sometimes they do a bit of
science but that is a seldom thing. After all if you accept that
electrons have to "ANTI ALIGN" because they are tiny
magnets, you are just fucking stupid.
Every thing points to
electrons having a monopole magnetic charge, just like the
electric charge they carry.
But the university
people will never stop being shallow thinkers loaded with too much
emotion to be good scientists. For example if a physics professor
sees a new unexplained phenomenon, this person first reaction will
always be "OMG, what will the colleagues think of it?".
And with an attitude
like that you might become a good scientist but at the same time
your results will never ever stand the test of time.
Electrons are not tiny
magnets, it has nothing to do with the size of your research
budget. Even if institutions like CERN would have an infinite
budget, electrons will never be the tiny magnets as they think
over there.
End of the rant for
this week, thanks for your attention and see you next week or
so.
(06 March
2024) Just two items.
Item 1) Russian
aviation losses this high in just a few weeks?
Item 2) A relative cheap SG experiment + new magnetic post.
Item
1) Russian aviation losses this high in just a few weeks?
The numbers mentioned
are huge, about one air plane a day or so. But if it's all more or
less correct that is good news for Ukraine. I have no idea how all
of a sudden this acceleration in downed Russian aviation assets is
done. It could be a lot of things, may be new weaponry or more
accurate knowledge of where the Russian planes are. It could be
this, it could be that.
I selected two media
resources with slightly contrasting titles:
Russia Aviation Activity Drops after $1BN of Craft Lost in
2024—ISW
Link used: https://www.newsweek.com/russia-air-force-aviation-
activity-eastern-ukraine-avdiivka-1875526
And you can also look
at it this way:
Shift in Russian Tactics Intensifies Air War in Ukraine
Link used: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/05/
world/europe/ukraine-war-russia-planes.html
A quote from the New
York Times:
Ukrainian officials and military analysts said Russian aviation had played an important role in the capture of Avdiivka, one that
required Russian jets “to fly closer” to the front line to maximize the effect of the glide bombs. And that exposed them to the risk
of being shot down by Ukraine’s air defenses.
So there are a lot of
explanations possible, anyway if all more or less correct it is a
good development. It has to be remarked however it is unknown how
long there will be no glider bombs any more...
__________
A lot more did happen,
for example after Marcon's remarks last week all in all four
countries have indicated to be willing in sending boots on the
ground in Ukraine. My country is one of those four countries but I
don't want to comment on that now because it is a bit late
already. So lets save that for a another day.
For no reason at all
you can enjoy the next nice picture, it is from that latest SORA
video release. The developments in AI still go fast and furious
and it's anybody's guess where this all will lead to.
I forgot to copy the
video link but here is that freaky alien that very likely is a
staunch supporter of Ukraine:
Lets go to the next
item.
Item 2) A relative cheap SG experiment + new magnetic post.
Over the years I have
been looking at a whole lot of video's where guys use magnetic
fields to manipulate electron beams. And all in all that never
lead anywhere because they all want to demonstrate the Lorentz
force and as such hold the magnetic field perpendicular against
the electron beam.
So a few days back I
come across that video from a physics teacher that wanted to see
what happens if you apply the magnetic field parallel to the
electron beam.
That was interesting
because it looked a bit like the way I did that myself years and
years ago with that 12€ second hand black and white television
and a 50€ stack of neodymium magnets.
Since I succeeded in
getting two separate regions, see photo below, I more or less once
more jumped to the conclusion that you can't kill the idea that
electrons are magnetic monopoles. Click on the picture for the
video:
Video title: Helical Electron Beams
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QmeHCw6pN0
The problem I have
with all these video's is that these people never try to split the
electron beam in two different paths. There are so many ways to do
your own SG experiment on the cheap.
You have to take my
word for it, but the black ring on the photo below is going round
the whole thing. I mean we have two separated regions where
electrons land on the screen.
Title of the last
post: Nice experiment: Magnetic field in the direction of an electron beam.
Well thanks for your
attention and stuff like that.
(01 March 2024) Today
our caretaker government announced the making of three new frigates
to replace old stuff. That's a big order and luckily they can be
made here in our own country. It will take some time before they
are finished, about eight years or so. Items for today:
Item 1) Olga says she
is cloned in China, it's a crazy story.
Item 2) And another idiot on Majorama fermion quantum computing.
Item 1) Olga says she is cloned in China, it's a crazy story.
Is the US government
going into a shutdown? I didn't know it was one of those times
again, it's always a bit strange to observe that from
abroad...
Anyway today I have a
bit more light subject in the sense it doesn't have to do with all
that death and destruction from the last two years. I just looked
at Olga her video and only later realized she is from
Ukraine.
It seems that in China
they made a video clone from her and that is used in a lot of
Chinese channels where they often make weird propaganda for
Russian/Chinese relations. Click on the picture for the video:
Video title: Somebody Cloned Me in China...
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FQSFnZpsqw
It's a totally weird
video, I think I would not like it either if that happened to me
but there is not much video out there with me in it anyway. But
for a Ukrainian woman to get used in those weird video's promoting
Russia and China being the best friends for ever and always is
weird.
Who is pumping out
video's like that? Lets go to the next item.
Item
2) And another idiot on Majorama fermion quantum computing.
I selected this video
because a few weeks ago I observed a Microsoft executive
explaining something about quantum mechanics. (Over at Micrsoft
they try to make quantum computers based on topological materials
and weird stuff like those Majorana fermions.) It went something
like this:
If you
see the light from a star from say one billion light years away,
why do you see that and is the photon not one billion light years
on the other side of the star? Well that is because it reacted in
your eye so it can't be at the other side of the star.
That struck me as an
odd view on the quantum stuff; This Microsoft executive thought
likely that light could be in a superposition of opposite
directions. I doubt that this is true, if you see light from a
star so far away it is more likely that it has traveled
uninterrupted for a billion years of time. You can even
experimentally verify that:
Just place an object
between yourself and that star. You will notice no light will
enter your eyes strongly suggesting that light takes a path
through space and is not some goofy woofy quantum thingeling.
In the video you see
likely the source of those weird words as spoken by the Microsoft
executive. His name is Charles Marcus and could be the source of
such weird interpretations of quantum mechanics.
Anyway Charles thinks
that all stuff in their so called standard model is verified by
experiment. That's total bullshit of course, there still is
nothing that proves by experiment that electrons are tiny magnets.
Now Charles is a sympathetic guy and a person in his position must
be of course enthusiastic upon the possibilities of quantum
computing, but Charles is also a total idiot.
It's obvious that
Charles does not realize all things wrong with viewing the
electrons as tiny magnets, that is he thinks the Gauss law for
magnetism is just true always on all scales. Once more: there is
no fucking experimental proof for that. We only observe overpaid
people talking out of their necks.
To my surprise in this
year 2024 Microsoft is still trying to make quantum computers
based on those Majorama fermions. My dear reader in about 90 years
of time there is never ever a particle found that is it's own
anti-particle. The only stuff there was is withdrawn by the TU
Delft. By the way, at TU Delft at the quantum department they too
are day in day out to fucking stupid to understand it is rather
unlikely that electrons are tiny magnets... But that aside.
Anyway the video is
long, about one hour, it is entertaining and Charles is a
sympathetic guy. But my expectation is the Mircosoft approach to
quantum computing will never work.
Video title: "Tying Knots in Quantum Computing," Charles Marcus, Center for Quantum Devices, Niels Bohr Institute.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lY6Xd-yp9ng
But as the years pass
one by one I more and more doubt most forms of trying to make
quantum computers will fail. As soon as there is an energy
difference between what they write as the 0 and 1 state, it likely
does not work.
To put it simple: You
cannot make super positions of states with different energy
levels.
But all those years I
am looking at this stuff, I only observe people like Charles or
his pal Leo Kouwenhove who many years ago was also very good at
talking quantum bullshit.
I think my rant is
long enough by now and I want to thank you for your attention and
don't believe crap like "Everything in the standard model is
tested by experiment".
(28 Feb 2024) No intro
talk about anything, just two items:
Item 1) Sweden is nr
32, Germany on Taurus & cute Macron words.
Item 2) New math post on taking conjugates on five different
spaces.
Item
1) Sweden is nr 32, Germany on Taurus & cute Macron words.
The Hungarian
parliament voted in favor of letting Sweden into NATO and as such
the last hurdle was finally taken for Sweden. What I didn't have
that sharp on my mind was how long Sweden was actually neutral or
on their own, about 200 years. So this is indeed a tectonic shift
away from the past. A short Reuters report on the stuff:
Sweden's NATO accession ends era of go-it-alone security
Link used: https://www.reuters.com/world/swedens-nato-
accession-ends-era-go-it-alone-security-2024-02-26/
Suchominus had an
interesting video on how much air planes were downed in just a
couple of days. I have to admit it slipped a bit beside my
attention likely because it were so many SU-34's. So if you hear
that word SU-34 you think it's just one plane repeated like so
often news is repeated. Suchominus wondered what ace Ukraine did
have up it's sleeve and me to I don't know. Click on the picture
for the video of Suchominus:
Video title: Ukraine Reports Another Su-34 Shot Down -- 10 Aircraft in 12 Days, 7th Su-34.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAPQU9zNKWc
And of course there
was another Russian AWACS down, the second in also a short period
of time. Of course if the economical sanctions work properly it is
very hard for Russia to replace those air planes for the
foreseeable future.
__________
From Germany came the
explanation about the no Taurus for Ukraine. It's more or less
they are afraid that they could be misused. Well there is no
denying that, the present political situation looks stable but
with politics you never know what the future brings. This line of
reasoning is completely accepted by me, if countries give military
aid it must be the stuff of their own choosing.
Of course countries are free to fill in their help the way they
want.
From France came a
very different sound, Macron suggested things like "Why not
NATO boots on UA ground?" That causes a tiny stir among EU
and NATO allies. What do I think of it?
Well I think that no
NATO member has been attacked and as such there is no direct
involvement needed as some form of NATO response. Again the
principle is that countries are sovereign and as such may be
France could deploy her military in Ukraine. On the one hand I
have no problem with that while on the other hand we must not
steer the situation into a completely uncontrollable
thing.
At least one thing is
clear: Ukraine needs more military hardware...
Lets go to the next item.
Item
2) New math post on taking conjugates on five different spaces.
A lot of people know
what the conjugate of a complex number is: You flip that complex
number in the real axis or to put it in math writing:
z = x + iy turns into z = x - iy.
In the last years a
few time I observed people on the divers math websites out there
who had indeed found 3D complex numbers. They know how to write
them down, sometimes even come up with a matrix representation and
on top of that the determinant of such matrices.
But taking the conjugate always goes totally wrong, they can't let
loose the idea you must flip it in the real axis and as such they
get gibberish results and give up thinking 3D complex numbers are
not worth investigating further.
I have never ever seen
anyone doing it right and that was one of my motivations to write
this new post. Another reason was of course that a lot of people
know what a conjugate is and as such I can avoid to much on the
introduction to that idea.
The choice for five
different spaces was may be a bit over the top, may be I can
mentally jump from one such space to the next but I doubt if there
are many people who can do the same. And if they can they do not
need this post in their life...
But why should a
reader precisely understand every detail I mention? If they
learned something new about one of those details, may be that is
enough. It's just like asking how much food should be in one meal?
Well that depends a lot on who is consuming that meal.
Anyway I decided to
also include one of those more exotic number spaces like in this
case the hyperbolic multiplication in the plane. Actually there is
not a 'the' hyperbolic multiplication, I took the one that say if
you square the imaginary unit you get minus one plus three times
the imaginary unit. Or in mathy words: i^2 = -1 + 3i.
And the conjugate is
such an i is given by 3 - i, at first sight this
looks crazy but it has it's own logic. And that logic is
unavoidable because it does not lead to gibberish results.
In the picture below I
show you also one of the works of Esher on the hyperbolic plane.
As far as I know this hyperbolic geometry has nothing to do with
my hyperbolic complex numbers beside that I use actual
hyperboles...
If you want to know a
bit more about this conjugate stuff click on the picture to land
at the other website.
To end this update
with a few words in my native Dutch language:
Wel daar kunnen die
halve gare wiskunde professors een puntje aan zuigen, hee zootje
halve garen: zijn die drie dimensionale complexe getallen na 33
jaar nog steeds te moeilijk? Nou ja, laat dan maar zitten...
Let me leave it with
that and see you in a future update.
(23 Feb 2024) No intro
only two items:
Item 1) EU declares
the 13-th package of economical sanctions.
Item 2) Tiny bit of math and a small electron rant.
Item
1) EU declares the 13-th package of economical sanctions.
On the eve of the
third year of war in Ukraine there is a 13-th round or packet of
economical sanctions. You constantly hear there are people that
think the economical sanctions don't work because for example the
Russian economy will grow an estimated 2+% this year.
Well yes that's all
true but the present 2% or 2+% is not like we have it over here,
it's mostly military production that goes to Ukraine to get shot
to pieces. It's not like investment in infrastructure or education
that will have decade long economical benefits.
It's estimated their
so called wealth fund will run out in about two years at the
present speed, of course they can hold on a long time to just
printing money but all the time the sanctions will build up.
It's an economy and it
doesn't drop dead if you point a finger at it and say "Now
drop dead please". No it takes a lot of work to maintain the
efficiency of such sanctions, take for example all those rumors on
the shadow fleet of tankers. Of course Russia will try to evade
the sanctions if possible, that alone keeps maintaining existing
sanctions always a thing.
Deutsche Welle had a
small oversight, as always click on the picture to land at the
video:
Video title: 13th sanctions package on the second anniversary of the Russian invasion of Ukraine | DW News
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGV83d82oYQ
Lets go to our next
item.
Item
2) Tiny bit of math and a small electron rant.
I already showed you
the latest math post in the update from two days back but today I
viewed that new AI video from Google it was I believe and it was
indeed interesting. I liked the sharks in the city picture while
of course people that make art for a living often don't like it.
May be in some future math will also be on the chopping block as a
thing that is better done by machines. They already succeeded in
an AI doing math Olympiad exercises and those are often hard. It
was reported the AI was almost as good as the best human
participant but it is always a question how that is actually
measured. For example does the AI need to hand over the
calculations or is just the answer enough?
Interesting detail in the Olympiad stuff was that they did not
have enough training data and so they made artificially much more
of such exercises to train the AI with. That struck me as a bit
strange: How do you make millions of math Olympiad
questions?
Anyway the new post
was on an de Moivre identity for those elliptic complex numbers
that are ruled by another form of imaginary unit. One that behaves
as i^2 = -1 + i. All stuff that is a circle in the
complex plane as many people know it now become ellipses. Often
you can find a one-on-one correspondence between such spaces these
elliptic complex spaces are not brand new spaces in that sense.
I tried to do a few internet searches but even Google (that I
mostly avoid these years) had not one meaningful search result.
Not even one of my own pictures while from before the present AI
hype Google could already read the content of images. But not this
time.
Anyway if you want to
read that mathy stuff click on the picture:
Title of the new post:
A de Moivre identiy for the i^2 = -1 + i multiplication.
__________
Electron rant time!
I didn't make the next
picture for nothing at all, it abundantly shows the nonsense that
comes along with the Pauli exclusion principle. The Pauli
exclusion principle says that in an electron pair the electrons
must have different spins. There are only two kinds of spin so the
spins must be opposite.
Furthermore the
physics community believes that electrons are tiny magnets and if
they have opposite spins you can only have two weird things. In
the picture below I made is the so called "north pole to
north pole" binding and if that crap of the professional
physics community is true there must also be "south pole to
south pole" bindings or bridges as I often name them.
Anyone with only basic
knowledge of chemistry and chemical bonds will understand that
likely the stuff below is not very good at holding molecules
together. If on the other hand you view electrons as magnetic
monopoles, all of a sudden the Pauli principle becomes logical and
not that extremely mysterious thing the physics professors make of
it.
This week I did see
one of those horrible video's and I am sorry but I forgot to note
the title or so. But the guy in the video explained the electron
pair by drawing next together on the black board an arrow pointing
up and next to it an arrow pointing down.
In the view of this
idiot that represented "opposing spins". After that Mr.
Total Idiot took his chalk and did draw a circle through the two
arrows stating that this is how the magnetic field lines
go.
So Mr. Total Idiot
explains the mysterious anti-alignment of electrons by stating
they are aligned because the magnetism goes around in a
loop.
You know I am often
dissatisfied with the average math professor. But that is more
like they miss creativity while those physics professors are far
more worse because they simply talk rubbish out of their neck and
get paid for it.
It still stays a
mystery: Why can't people like Mr'. Total Idiot or for that matter
100% of the physics community not see all these problems that come
with "Everything must be a bipolar magnet, even
electrons"?
I just don't get it:
There quantum computers will never work so why go on behaving so
stupid day in day out year in year out?
__________
End of this update, as
always thanks for your attention and till next week or so. Or next
year or whatever what.
(21 Feb 2024) Avdiivka
seems to be lost and there are now Russian flags hanging... It
comes at an estimated less for Russia of almost 50 thousand dead
and wounded, to put it in perspective: That is more than all
losses during the war against Afghanistan.
In my view this also shows that at the Kremlin things are nor very
rational, it is just that seething ball of emotions that was there
all those years. For example back in time, the year 2014 likely,
all of a sudden my country could no longer export vegetables to
Russia. At that point in time I already understood that very
likely in the future all of a sudden Europe would be without gas.
Well guess three times what happened...
Lets go to our items
for today:
Item 1) Denmark makes
a statement, ammo situation getting worse.
Item 2) New math post on the other website.
Item
1) Denmark makes a statement, ammo situation getting worse.
So that is some hefty
statement: Denmark has decided it will give all it's artillery and
artillery ammo to Ukraine. The Danish pm remarked that there are
still stockpiles of artillery shells in Europe and they should go
to Ukraine too.
So what can I say on
that? Very simple; of course I cannot give advice of what to give
and what not. That is always to the decision of the individual
countries. Beside that countries have to weigh their specific
security situation for themselves, they also have of course a
responsibility for the security to their own populations. To put
it simple: The closer your country is located to Russia, the
higher emergency levels of ammo you must have...
I want to say that it's a brave decision done by Denmark, so
thumbs up for Denmark. Click on the picture to land at the UATV
video:
Video title: Artillery from Denmark and F-16s from Netherlands - New EU Aid for Ukraine.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNMeioN1MU4
Once more I want to
caution against too much hype around the F-16s deliveries from my
home country. It is not a wunder waffe or a wonder weapon. It's an
important and very significant weapon system and can fire an
amazing wide spectrum of all kinds of ammo. But on it's own it's
likely not the deciding factor to end or win this war.
__________
The ammo shortage
begins to bite deeper, the loss of Avdiivka or however you spell
the name of that place, is said to be caused by the lack of ammo.
In the meantime the members of the US parliament, the congress as
it is known over there, are still on a paid leave...
In this world there is never a shortage on weirdo's and with that
we go to the next item.
Item
2) New math post on the other website.
Last week I finally
published the latest post about that version of the so called de
Moivre identity. All in all it becaume about 10 pictures long and
I didn't even prove the whole thing. I only worked out the square
so that is n = 2 in the picture below. The post also grew a bit
long because I wanted to go through all the nitty gritty details
that come with it. Not that there was ever a doubt it could not be
proven, once you have your new complex exponential you always get
a new de Moivre identity for free.
Another reason the
post is relatively long is that I included a bit of that
historical information in it, for example a formulation of how
Abraham de Moivre more or less for the first time formulated his
result. And as so often in math, the original stuff is often very
different from how we use it today.
Of course if you want
to prove the statement below you must use the rule for the
imaginary unit as i^2 = -1 + i. So this is a bit
different from the complex plane and that is of course the reason
we can find such a new identity. I did not check in any manner if
this is new or not but all in all I do not expect the professional
math professors to have found this kind of a complex plane for
themselves.
What I consider a cute
detail is that real factor you see, that two third of the square
root of 3. That factor is raised to some power n so it becomes
huge for large n but the cosine & sine powers eat it all away
and the end result will always be on the (unit) ellipse.
Click on the picture
to land at the new post:
Title new math post: A de Moivre
identity for the i^2 = -1 + i multiplication.
Link used: https://3dcomplexnumbers.net/2024/02/17/a-de-moivre-
identiy- for-the-i2-1-i-multiplication/
__________
No electron rant in
this update, thanks for your attention and till some other
update.
(16 Feb 2024) Here we
go, no intro talk:
Item 1) Another
warship sunk, drone coalition & still waiting...
Item 2) If you think you understand it, you don't understand it.
Item
1) Another warship sunk, drone coalition & still waiting...
Yes another of those
transport ships sunk, that would be about 30% of the Russian Black
sea fleet in total. Two weeks ago when a smaller vessel named Ivanovets
was sunk I did not have time to make a screen shot but here it is.
If you want to see the short video in case you haven't, click on
the picture to land at the BBC:
Article: Ukraine 'hits Russian missile boat Ivanovets in Black Sea'
Link used: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-68165523
I wanted to combine
the above picture with the latest drone attack but for some reason
the BBC website started to fight me and I ran out of patience.
Anyway you can look it up for yourself in case you missed
it.
__________
Then there was talk
about a drone coalition, this of course because drones have been
so effective in this war. So that sounds as a good idea because
say for yourself those Ukraine sea drones are pretty
amazing.
__________
A lot more did happen
of course, for example a new kind of hyper sonic missile fired at
a target in the capital Kyiv. In the meantime we're still waiting
if and when the Americans can sort their thing out.
Lets go to the next
item.
Item 2) If you think you understand it, you don't understand it.
About two weeks ago I
made that middle part of the picture below. And when I made that I
wanted it to use every week just to show how bizarre the world is
when electrons are tiny magnets.
So I did not do that
last week because I am a very chaotic person...;)
Anyway, for me the
electron pair is one of those examples that make much more sense
if you view electrons as being magnetic monopoles. That makes
sense in chemical bonds where that 'north pole against north pole'
stuff is just total crap.
So how do professional
physics people deal with it when their theories lead to very weird
things? Well they deal with it like for example Feynman did (I
made a typo down below, my keyboard needs replacement because it
starts to wear out a bit to much). Anyway it is that famous
"If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't
understand quantum mechanics".
But a lot of these
weird anomalies, like my picturing of an electron pair, is simply
accepted as the way it just is. All these anomalies are there only
because the electron is viewed as a tiny magnet.
Take for example so
called "Anti-magnetic" materials, with that it is meant
that the electron spins are as mixed as possible. So for every
spin up electron there is always a spin down electron near. Now
when I view my beloved electrons as the magnetic monopoles they
are, it is very logical that this is the lowest energy
configuration related to magnetism possible.
And if you view electrons as tiny magnets, this is a crazy
configuration of being the lowest energy level. What the fuck
keeps all those tiny magnets together in this crazy
way?
Well I have seen it
myself a few times, they (the physics folks) explain this
alternating spin stuff as "the lowest energy state for such
materials". So you have a bunch of stuff with a crazy
explanation (all those anti aligned dipole spins) and you just
classify that as a group with this stuff the lowest energy level
stuff... And that with our beloved tax money.
It is time to end this
update, I want to say that I made up the text in the upper part of
the picture below where I fake how he explains an electron pair.
Of course it's a crazy explanation but you can rationalize it via
remarking that you do understand it because you don't understand
it or something like that...
Richard is still
famous today for instigating the interest there is today in
quantum computers. In my house he is famous for telling the world
that "There is plenty of room at the bottom".
Without doubt he was talking about bottoms of his female students
and I was like wow! Yes I was like wow because that is an
interesting way of teaching quantum mechanics to females:
Can I check if there is plenty of room?
May be it is a good
time to split my dear reader, if you think you understand Richard
you don't understand Richard. As always thanks for your
attention.
(14 Feb 2024) No intro
talk, just two items.
Item 1) Scholtz calls
for more hardware for UA & Steadfast Defender.
Item 2) A fun math detail & a horrible video on spin liquids.
Item
1) Scholtz calls for more hardware for UA & Steadfast
Defender.
Kansler Scholtz called
for a stepping up of EU military hardware production. And I agree
fully with that, of course it would be nicer if those old peace
dividends would just keep on growing but they don't. So there must
be a strategic shift toward higher military budgets and as such
also more hardware production in the EU and NATO countries.
DW has a short video
on it:
And there is a
relative large operation named Steadfast Defender. For the first
time Sweden is participating too, so welcome Sweden!
DW had a video out on
that (I not on the payroll of DW, but I forgot to save the link.
In the meantime I do not feel like commenting and all that
political stuff like interviews or contributions from the donald.
After all I have the
right to keep my brain a bit sane...;)
Lets go to the next item.
Item
2) A fun math detail & a horrible video on spin liquids.
Yesterday I had
nothing to do for 10 minutes and on my smart tv is a standard app
bing.com and to kill the time I looked up if there were 3D complex
numbers.
That's my way of
viewing monkeys, instead of going to the zoo I search for stuff
like "Proof that electrons are tiny magnets". The goal
is to laugh a little bit so I do that not very often.
So I clicked on one of
the links as offered to be from the Microsoft bing.com and I was
very surprised. A person under the name of Guilherme A C Zaluchi
offered a link to my other website. And on top of that took the
time to flea through a few important details like matrix
representation and even the numbers alpha and tau.
Well I would like to
thank Guilherme for his contribution and I smiled softly when the
remark was "The inverse is much harder to take".
Anyway the reason I
show you this is not to brag but there is another way of doing
multiplication in 3D space. It is above the answer by Guilherme
and as you see after a few seconds of inspection, the product of
the imaginary units i and j must be zero. So the
inverse might be more easy but that will later come with a very
hefty price when you realize now the basis vectors might be
non-invertible... I made my version of 3D complex numbers such
that this problem would be avoided...
Click on the picture
to land at the Q & A session in math land:
Author: Guilherme A C Zaluchi
Page title: Complex numbers in 3 dimensions [duplicate]
Link used: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3824935
/complex-numbers-in-3-dimensions/4069877#4069877
__________
Electron time! The
last few days the Youtube suggestion video's constantly pop up
video's about topological quantum computing in general and the
Kitaev spin liquid model in particular.
No it is not spin ice
this time but spin liquid. And in such an electron spin liquid
kind of stuff, all spins can flip if they want to. Just as easy
and with that they are going to make quantum computers...
As far as I know, over
there at Microsoft they still try to make quantum computers based
on that topology stuff. May be it is time that the Microsoft
managers just ask that simple question at their engineers:
Can you make a device
that flips the spin of only one electron? Please just
please?
In my view, all that
overhyped quantum cojmputing stuff based on electron spin will
never work. Likely that will go for the Microsoft topological
quantum computer too if it's somehow based on electron spin as
that tiny magnet stuff.
The next video is
horrible bad on the one hand but fascination on the other hand:
Why do all these people keep on telling all that crap upon
spin?
Video title: Natalia Perkins | Why are we excited about the Kitaev model?
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Weo4S45BZFg
Oh oh Mr Kitaev, I
think electrons are magnetic monopoles. As such I wonder now we
are a few decades later, where are the quantum computers based on
your Hamiltonian?
I have nothing more to
say but: Thanks for your attention.
(09 Feb 2024) In my
native country the first formation of a new government has failed.
Interesting detail is that Peter Omzigt blamed his withdrawal on
the fact there are a lot of financial skeletons in a lot of closets...
That would be a bit strange from Mark Rutte, the outgoing pm. Well
may be it's all gossip but that Peter guy is often rather serious,
so I will follow that financial detail in the future.
Two links for
today:
Item 1) New military
commander in Ukraine.
Item2) Tiny bit of math and another crazy electron spin
video.
Item
1) New military commander in Ukraine.
The rumor mill was
working overtime lately but today it was confirmed. Valery is out
but stays in the UA military top and I forgot the name of the new
military commander.
Well I consider this a
purely internal matter for Ukraine but I would like to write a few
words on the guy. I liked Valery because he was never in the news,
I considered that a good thing. With never in the news I mean he
did not give many interviews or so and zero media acts. It looked
like he just wanted to work without such
distractions...
And see: The Almighty
generated a new miracle on earth; Valery knows how to
shave...;)
But serious, thanks
for your work Valery and I hope you can make new contributions to
the war effort.
Lets go to the next
item.
Item2)
Tiny bit of math and another crazy electron spin video.
The new math post is
finished, about four days ago or so, but I was lazy and I still
have to turn it into pictures. For myself this post was more or
less a totally useless exercise (showing the exponential circle
behaves indeed exponential).
But there are also
readers that are a bit more skeptical when I make such claims like
new forms of the de Moivre identity. Another reason to write this
post is that I wanted to see in detail myself how difficult it
would be to do these relative simple calculations. In itself it's
mostly manipulating gonio metric functions like sine and cosine,
but writing it all neatly down is more where the complicated stuff
lies.
Last week I showed you
the general version, in this post I only calculated the square and
the result is shown below. If for some reason you want to check it
yourself, please remark this is not the standard complex
multiplication. Here you must use the rule i^2 = -1 + i
to make it work.
I think in about one
week of time, the new post is hanging out on the other
website.
Let me repeat the
picture from last week, this is the more general formulation that
I did not prove:
Electron time! Today I
found another video where a guy is happy to explain to all who
want it to hear how the math of electron spin works.
And he talks and talks about that wonderful experiment known as
the Stern-Gerlach experiment. And of course there is the blah blah
blah related to a repeated or sequential SG experiment.
The video is about
half an hour long (I would not recommend it by the way, if you
have a normal life you gain not much by watching this garbage) and
never ever this guy realized that such experiments have never been
done.
That is why at the
present date in the year 2024 we only talk about the Stern-Gerlach
experiment from the year 1922 and how 'revolutionizing' or
'sensational' or whatever what it was.
But for so many claims
the physics people make, there is not experimental evidence at
all. Let me just name a few things:
1) Electrons are
indeed tiny magnets, or
2) Electrons do actually anti-align themselves against an applied
magnetic field, or
3) Electrons do not get accelerated by a constant magnetic field,
or
4) .......
Etc etc etc, if you
want you can find a list of say one hundred important details that
are believed in electron spin but are never ever
tested.
The logical thing is
that electrons are magnetic monopoles with a constant unflippable
monopole magnetic charge. But during the last 9 years I have
learned that logic does not work, the physics community keeps on
doing their weird stuff with electrons that must be tiny magnets
for some untold reason.
This time I selected a
male robot from the pixabay website, it's another miracle that
they have such pictures although there are more pictures of female
robots. How come that?
Anyway the screenshot
shows a repeated series of SG experiments but the video guy never
realized this is all theory from the Pauli guy never validated via
experiment...
Click on the picture if you want to see the video (although I do
not recommend this video because it's so fucking stupid):
Video title: The Mathematics of Measuring Spin, Pasayten institute
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClE0ppWsCgQ
That was it for this
week, thanks for your attention.
(07 Feb 2024) No intro
just two items:
Item 1) More Dutch
F16's for Ukraine, reason is unknown.
Item 2) The pdf from Martin Bauer & CERN going crazy?
Item
1) More Dutch F16's for Ukraine, reason is unknown.
At first I had only a
Dutch version of the news but later I found an English version of
it. So I will place both links below. Anyway there were some plans
to sell a few of our old F16's to some US company, but the deal
does not go through any longer. The exact reason is unknown but
now they will go to Rumania for the training center and/or to
Ukraine.
It's all future music
and it doesn't help in the present ammo shortage. Someone remarked
that for just flying an F16 for one hour, you need over 30 hours
of maintenance to make that possible...
May be it's a good
idea to sell the F16's to Ukraine at the price for a new F35. In
that case we have a new fleet of F35's for almost nothing and we
can use the freed up money to pay off more state debt... Isn't
that a good idea yes or yes? After all now the Ukrainians and us
learn to know each other a little bit, they should learn from our
frugality because that is so deeply ingrained in our Dutch
souls...
Here are the two
links:
Nederland haalt F-16’s uit de verkoop.
Link used:
https://www.defensie.nl/actueel/nieuws/2024/02/05/
nederland-haalt-f-16s-uit-de-verkoop
And an English version
of the same news:
Netherlands halts F-16 sale to US firm, will send to Ukraine instead
Link used: https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2024/02/05/
netherlands-halts-f-16-sale-to-us-firm-will-send-to-ukraine-instead/
Lets go to the next
item.
Item 2) The pdf from Martin Bauer & CERN going crazy?
The pdf from Martin
with the translation of the original Stern-Gerlach publication is
very good. So that is a bit of a contrast with the interview video
I showed you last week between Martin and Brian Keating.
I want to remark
however that the use of an inhomogeneous magnetic field was less
crazy in the year 1922 compared to now when physics folks think
that is the only way you can accelerate electrons with magnetic
fields.
As so often, you
already feel it coming, there is no experimental proof or
validation that electrons don't get accelerated by a very constant
magnetic field. And the Martin & Brian just kept talking out
of their necks never remarking such problems.
Anyway, here is a link
to the preprint archive:
The
Stern-Gerlach Experiment
Translation of: “Der experimentelle Nachweis der
Richtungsquantelung im Magnetfeld”
Link used: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.11343.pdf
Back in 1922 they were
more thinking that the electron went around the nucleus and as
such produced a tiny bipolar magnetic field. But that is much much
larger in space compared to the magnetic field that a bipolar
electron must have because it is also considered to be a point
particle.
After all atoms are
many orders of magnitude bigger as electrons so it might have had
an effect, they were not all 100% crazy.
I haven't read the pdf
in it's entirety but it contains lots of cute details, for example
the exposure time of the beam of silver atoms was 8 hours! And the
pressure was as low as 10 to the minus 5 mm Hg, at present day
nobody uses mm Hg anymore beside old barometers. And I too had
never read the original Stern-Gerlach publication while I can read
German, so it's a good thing this translation is there. And of
course it stays a bad thing that professional physics people just
are too stupid or unwilling to see all the problems there are with
electron spin as a tiny magnet.
__________
Today or yesterday it
came out that CERN has a proposal for a new particle collider of
just 16 billion €. It should be about three times as long as the
present one so almost one hundred km?
Well if I could vote
on such a proposal I would vote:
NO!
There are so many
reasons for my no vote, let me mention only two:
Reason 1: The CERN
people themselves tried to find magnetic monopoles. All their
stuff failed, their versions of physical reality came not come
true. They never blamed the weird theory they use, that Paul Dirac
stuff.
On top of that they are to fucking stupid to find out for
themselves that electrons are magnetic
monopoles.
Reason 2: The only
thing the CERN folks found was that so called Higgs boson. That
was in the year 2012 so now 12 years back. And although I like
science like that, all these 12 years I have never seen a good
explanation as why that small bubble on some graph is proof of the
Higgs.
But more important: Before the present CERN particle collider was
build there were also plenty of promises like super symmetric
particles would now likely be found.
In my view the physics
people should first clean up their beloved standard model on
particle physics. Give after 100 years finally some experimental
proof for claims like electrons are tiny magnets or that they only
get accelerated by inhomogeneous magnetic
fields.
These CERN people are
fucking incompetent and they should not be handed 16 billion €
with new promises like finding dark matter.
The Financial Times
has an article on this CERN detail:
Cern chiefs push €16bn particle accelerator expansion plan
Link used: https://www.ft.com/content/
8818373d-87e1-43e9-ba0e-2851c4f17bd8
That was it for today.
Thanks for your attention.
(02 Feb 2024) I can't
remember I changed a thing but all of a sudden I find myself back
in some form of Youtube heaven. Normally if you start Youtube you
already get a boatload of video's you just don't want to see.
These video's are for lets say people with another mindset than I
have.
But now I get a clean white page with a search bar on top and just
one message. It looks like this, it says my history is turned
off:
Two items for today's
update:
Item 1) EU aid package
for UA goes through & other US news.
Item 2) Once more on the importance of that Einstein stuff from 31
Jan.
Item
1) EU aid package for UA goes through & other US news.
It was the breaking
news of the day, within an hour or so after the meeting started
the news was the 50 billion € aid package for Ukraine can go on.
So that is good news and it's important because it's a multi year
package until 2027 or so. It's 17 billion in gifts and 33 billion
in loans. The loans were described like soft loans so my
understanding is that if Ukraine is late on paying say 50 cents,
we won't confiscate Ukraine itself...;)
But we ain't there
yet, the EU aid is for non-military stuff like salaries of
government civil workers or pensions to low income people. It's
not military gear and for that it would be great if the USA can
come together and do the right thing. And my dear USA political
leaders, for your aid package you get an awful lot of Russian
military killed, now who says no to that?
I first saw the
breaking news of DW, so click on the picture for the video:
Video title: EU agrees on €50 billion Ukraine aid package | DW News
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_l7xjErwPCI
There was much more
news today, in Crimea the Belbek airport came under attack by
Ukraine. If I understand that correctly the Russians had a lot of
air planes close together (likely they did not expect an attack)
and as such there was relatively much damage.
A 70 million € Tarantal class corvette was sunk, it was attacked
by sea drones. See for example the Suchominus channel.
Also very interesting
are those rumors that finally the small diameter bombs are already
in Ukraine or are about to be shipped that way. That's great but
it's still a rumor. The significant detail is of course their
range is longer as the standard HIMARS ammo the Ukrainians now
get.
And Joe from Joe Blogs
had another video out over the yearly reporting on the Russian
economy. Last year we had the strange details that shrinking oil
and gas sales by Russia were compensated by non oil and gas sales
but nobody knew what that was.
This year we seem to have the same mystery but the good news is
that the income of Russia from gas & oil is significantly down
last year 2023 compared to 2022 or 2021.
It is worth noting the figures as published by the Russians are
not wholly reliable because for example I still don't know what
that non oil & gas stuff actually is. Here is the video:
Video title: RUSSIAN Ruble Collapse & Sanctions are Crushing Russian Economy as Oil & Gas Revenues Fall 65%
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrryBjuTVmw
At last the ratio of
artillary use between Ukraine and Russia seems to be 1:5. So that
is a huge disadvantage for Ukraine...
Lets go to the next item.
Item
2) Once more on the importance of that Einstein stuff from 31 Jan.
For people who do not
know what the Stern Gerlach experiment is, look for details on the
internet for yourself. Anyway the guys Brian Keating and Martin
Bauer from the last video (see below) were stating that Einstein
himself pushed for those repeated experiments.
As far as I know no
such experiment was ever successful. Einstein has also given
advice to the Frish and Segré guys that wanted to flip the spin
of the electrons after they were spin selected. That experiment
failed.
If such an experiment
in the last century had been successful, in that case today we
would mostly speak about that and much much less about the
original Stern-Gerlach experiment. And why is that?
Well in quantum
mechanics they have that weird principle that says that if the
properties of a quantum particle are unmeasured, in that case it
is ALWAYS in a superposition of those possible states. The whole
present hype of quantum computing is build on that rather weird
and improvable principle.
If a repeated or sequential
experiment would have been successful, in that case such a person
would have found experimental evidence for that principle. As such
this person or persons would have won a Nobel prize almost sure.
As we all know, the Nobel prize is the most sought prize in
physics.
But as far as I know
there is never a Nobel prize handed out for that. Furthermore I
only see dumb people talking about repeated or sequential SG
experiments. They are dumb because they never realize it might be
handy if such results actually came for an experiment done or it
is just overpaid physics professors talking out of their neck once
more.
Now over the last 9
years my view on electron spin has evolved from "The physics
people think it's a tiny magnet" to what I think at present
day:
Electrons are
permanent magnetic monopoles and there is nothing that can 'flip'
their spin state just like it's a permanent electric monopole.
So for me it is very
important that all repeated SG-experiments fail, the lack of track
record in the history of physics combined with the tiny detail
never ever a Nobel prize has been handed out for this, suggests
once more to me it is impossible to kill the idea that electrons
are magnetic monopoles.
__________
After having clarified
the above, I also did forget to remark that in the picture below
is a big stupid thing on top. That big stupid thing is the idea
that at the same time that electrons are tiny magnets, an electron
pair is made up from two electrons with opposite spins.
It is clearly
nonsense, nature does not work that way and you don't have to be a
physics professor to understand this. An electron pair can't work
that way, that is rubbish.
So here is the picture
once more, if you click on it you get the two guys Brian Keating
and Martin Bauer sharing their insights on the significance of the
SG experiment from the year 1922.
From the flow of
information between these two people, is it wise to estimate that
physics people will only understand the problem with the tiny
magnet model for electron spin in say the year 2500?
This looks like a
reasonable estimate so since I am a reasonable person myself I
think it is time we split and as such this update is
ended.
(31 Jan 2024) Just two
items, no intro talk.
Item 1) Waiting for a
miracle & Jens in Washington.
Item 2) De Moivre identity & video on the Stern-Gerlach
experiment.
Item
1) Waiting for a miracle & Jens in Washington.
All in all I am not
very positive upon funding for Ukraine. It might very well go
wrong in Washington and of course in the EU it's problematic too.
Well lets hope for the best and prepare for the worst as the
saying is...
There was also some
renewed talk last week upon seizing the frozen reserves from the
Russian central bank. That is important too if you look at the
numbers: It's about 300 billion $ if memory serves. Or about five
times the size of the US proposal if that one goes through.
In another development
Jens Stoltenberg the present NATO chief went to Washington. Of
course there is a boatload to discuss. I only write about Ukraine
but there was also an attack on US soldiers in Jordan, all that
Palestine stuff and so on and so on. Sometimes I wonder if war is
some contagious kind of virus...
I didn't have time to
view the entire press conference but on C-Span they have the whole
thing. Interesting detail: Anthony Blinken is left handed. You
might say 'So what?' But I belong to that oppressed minority too,
so Anthony and I we are two lefties.
As always click on the
picture if you want to see the press conference:
Video title: Secretary Blinken Joint News Conference with NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg.
Link used: https://www.c-span.org/video/?533244-1/secretary-blinken-
joint-news-conference-nato-secretary-general-stoltenberg
Lets go to the next
item.
Item
2) De Moivre identity & video on the Stern-Gerlach experiment.
After a bit of doubt I
decided to craft the new so called de Moivre formular or identity
for that elliptic kind of complex plane you get when you use the
rule i^2 = -1 + 1.
If you have ever done
an elementary course on complex numbers, likely you have seen this
de Moivre formula. You can always use that in case you have
forgotten what sin(2t) or cos(2t) were when expressed into sin(t)
and cos(t).
Historical detail:
This de Moivre identity proceeds the Euler stuff by something like
half a century. Anyway this de Moivre guy was an interesting guy,
there is even a martingale that carries his name. Here is a good
wiki on the biography and works of Abraham de Moivre:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_de_Moivre
As so often in math,
the first findings were often very different from how we use them
today. That also goes for the present form of the de Moivre
formula. Abraham himself had a more or less inverted version from
it.
Anyway I have no idea
when the next post is ready but here is the new identity itself.
The AI picture of the humanoid is from Pixabay. If you need
pictures that are free to use it is a great place that Pixabay,
until last week I had never been there but it's a nice website.
Most of the time you
won't need more complicated de Moivre identities. That goes also
for me, of course there are more ways of finding say cos(2t) but
even I never need stuff for like below cos(2t + pi/6).
But writing down such
new de Moivre identities is always a feast in itself, so it's not
very practical but it is still a feast to do.
Electron time!
Brian Keating had a
long video out with Martin Bauer from Germany. For me it is very
interesting because it contains information that I did not know or
if I knew it was forgotten or neglected.
But Einstein himself
was much more involved in the Stern-Gerlach experiment than I
knew. Albert himself secured a lot of the funding of the original
SG experiment. On top of that it was Albert Einstein himself that
pushed for those 'repeated SG experiments' that would confirm the
math rules for spin flip of electrons in case the magnetic field
changes direction.
May be this Einstein
involvement causes that even today in the year 2024 people still
tell that crap about repeated Stern-Gerlach experiments.
In my view the mistake
physics people make is that they think electron spin is some
fragile quantum state. And just a tiny amount of energy will flip
the spin state of the electron.
I think that is all
100% BS and even in a nuclear explosion no electron flips spin
state. Electrons are magnetic monopoles just like they are
electric monopoles and all that blah blah blah from the two guys
in the video is just what it is: Blah blah blah.
Brian and Martin: Show
me the FUCKING experiment that validates the math rules you guys
use for electron spin flip and all that stuff. In nine years of
time I still haven't found it.
Well I am glad for all
the new info in this video, but why does the electron has to be a
tiny magnet as both gentlemen seem to think?
That is why I placed
my version of the electron pair from last week on top of the two
talking heads thinking electrons are tiny magnets while they have
no fucking experimental evidence for that.
Video title: Martin Bauer: The Revolutionary Stern-Gerlach Experiment
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiw3aJwc7TU
Ok, lets leave it with
that while I still do not understand why two of such guys keep on
believing into the tiny magnet model for the electron and why two
such smart guys absolutely don't talk about other experiments you
could do. I think that is just like asking a math professor about
why not using elliptical complex numbers?
Thanks for your
attention, see you in a next update.
(26 Jan 2024) Bah, one
of my wrists hurts so it is better to keep this update
short.
Item 1) UK to USA:
Don't go wobbly!
Item 2) A picture of the official version of electron spin.
Item 1) UK to USA: Don't go wobbly!
No comment on that
tragic loss of a plane where in according to Russia were 65
Ukrainian POW's. All POW's included the nine crew are dead. So
that was some sobering news it this is all correct.
__________
The New York Times has
a article with the funny title ‘No Time to Go Wobbly’ where
the NYT explains why the UK is lobbying the US republicans.
And may be that is a
good idea, after all the UK conservatives and the USA counter
parts are often on the same level playing field when it comes to
cognitive capabilities. And in such situations there is often
meaningful communication possible. While if the cognitive levels
are very different or asymmetric if you want and the ways of
thinking between two groups is just very very different, in such
cases it is not possible or much harder to have meaningful
communications...
May be you hit a pay wall and I would recommend not to read the
article or at least avoid paying for it, it's not such high
journalism that it is worth money. But it's a funny article title,
click on the picture to land at NYT:
Title: ‘No Time to Go Wobbly’: Why Britain Is Lobbying U.S. Republicans on Ukraine.
Link used: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/25/world/europe/ukraine-
uk-us-republicans.html
Lets go to the next
item.
Item
2) A picture of the official version of electron spin.
Sometimes when I try
to explain to people why the electrons cannot be tiny magnets,
often they have a very empty look in their eyes. And that is not
because they are stupid, I remember a time when I was such a
person myself.
All I knew nine years
ago is that people from the field of physics think that electrons
are tiny magnets. That is all I knew and for me too it took a long
time before I could go forth and back between electrons being
bipolar tiny magnets compared to electrons that have a monopole
magnetic charge.
And now so many years
later this has become so easy that it is hard to imagine that
other relative smart people are so slow when it comes to
understanding the implications of the 'tiny magnet' model compared
to what I think: electrons are permanent monopole magnets. (So
there's two kinds of electrons so to say).
It is well known that
in an electron pair the electrons must have opposite spins, that
is known as the Pauli exclusion principle. But what the physics
community will never tell you that if you apply such idea's to
tiny magnets, you get all kinds of weird stuff.
Bipolar magnets, large
or small, should always bind or connect via the principle that
only opposite poles attract. As such if it was true that electrons
are tiny magnets, their magnetic fields should align.
And they should not
anti align like I made in the next picture:
It is important to
realize that what is in the above picture is the official version
of electron spin without magnetic monopolism.
But such an image is
not findable on the internet, I had to make it myself. This is
what the physics professors never tell you because if they show
pictures like this everybody understands that they are crazy.
So that's why you always get those boatloads of math when they
talk about magnetism.
I have to say it works
pretty well, most people just don't see when a patch of math is a
good cover of what is known as physical reality and when a patch
of math is clearly misused.
For example Rabi
oscillations between electron spin states, it's an interesting
boatload of math but if electrons are just permanent magnetic
monopoles it is just bull shit.
Anyway yesterday on the other website I finally posted a new post
on magnetism. May be if you are a reader of this homepage you have
already seen that all because I selected the two most cute
magnetic details as I wrote them on this website.
Here is the link to
the new post:
That mysterious electron pair and so called VESPR
theory.
In this post I
selected the idiot talk from Cornell university (electron pairs
explained that is is just like two bar magnets connect with
opposite poles, the Cornell people are truly stupid). And of
course VESPR theory, this theory comes more from the chemical
sciences and may be I like it therefore more as the crap that
always comes from the physics community.
That's it for this
update, as always thanks for your attention.
(24 Jan 2024) I didn't
save any links so this is just me talking or writing and no link.
Two items for today's update:
Item 1) Random Ukraine
stuff.
Item 2) Tiny bit old math & repeat stupid Cornell explanation.
Item 1) Random Ukraine stuff.
As always much to much
did happen to comment upon. A crazy high number of civilian
wounded caused by the latest Russian missile attacks while Russia
is claiming they only targeted military production facilities...
Well the Kremlin and
it's internal steams of information will always be a source of
utter amazement. It really is a parallel universe or may be
better: it's a part of crazyland.
Now the ink of my
previous post wasn't even dry and there was another target hit in
the neighborhood of St. Petersburg. This time a gas producing
facility that makes liquid gas for export is my understanding.
Well after all those strikes from Russia against Ukrainian energy
infra structure, this is of course an allowed target.
This gas facility
attack had much more success compared to the oil attack from last
week in the same area of Russia. Here it took one full day before
the fires were more or less under control. And if gave a wonderful
picture with all that frozen water:
And not directly
related to Ukraine but it seems the Turkish parliament has voted
on membership of Sweden for the NATO alliance. I still think it
was rather unhandy to burn Korans in Sweden during demonstrations,
but it seems that under Swedish law it is allowed to so such
things. You can talk long or short on stuff like this, but I
always frown upon those weirdo's burning those religious books
while I do not have a problem with burning a flag or so. But in
Sweden it's allowed to burn religious texts so the only thing that
protects them is the limited discipline of those demonstrators.
Anyway I would like to thank the Turks for letting Sweden in!
The only country that has not given permission to enter NATO is of
course Hungary...
But I do not feel like
commenting on Hungary so lets go to the next item.
Item
2) Tiny bit old math & repeat stupid Cornell explanation.
I was thinking about a
magnetic post for on the other website containing two updates from
this website in the previous year:
That totally stupid
explanation of electron pairs by Cornell university.
And the way the so called VESPR theory works where the building
blocks for atoms and molecules emerge from the fact that electron
pairs repel each other.
Today I thought of a
similar thing as stupid as the Cornell explanation, it goes with
money and is as next:
If you have money in a savings account or
if you have taken on a loan and you are indebted, in that
case you always get so called interest. So all you have to
do is take on a loan because it acts 'just like' your
savings account... |
In case you don't remember the stupid line of reasoning by
Cornell, it was about electrons as tiny magnets and in order to
form electron pairs it is known the electrons must have opposite
spin. Having opposite spins is also known as 'anti alignment' and
is for sure one of the biggest mysteries in physics: Why do
electrons anti-align themselves?
Of course at Cornell they never explain that kind of nonsense they
keep on repeating year in year out.
Well I think that electrons are not tiny magnets but they are
monopoles when it comes to magnetism, just like their electric
charge is a monopole. If you look at it that way it becomes much
much more logical as why an electron pair is neutral under
application of magnetic fields.
Here is that tax payer paid crap once more:
In another development
in the graphical package DESMOS you can find online, after seeing
last week that guy adding up the first 200 terms of the famous
Riemann zeta function, I decided to do the same with my modified
Dirichlet kernels.
And in yet another
development I finally was that smart to go to Pornhub and look
over there for so called 'female robots'. The result was very
strange: Ok ok now the robots have better tits, actually they look
pretty amazingly good, but now they have NO FACE!
The things you have to
do for science, it is just amazing. How can you find out if these
robots have hollow tits yes or no? Can you very politely use a
rubber hammer on their tits and hear if it sound hollow?
And why do female
robots need tits anyway? Life is full of deep deep mysteries like
why do physics people believe in electron spin as tiny magnets? If
they would use that tax payer money more wisely they would
investigate if these tits are hollow or massive. Likely that will
lead to some "New Physics" as they call it.
Anyway in the picture
below you can see the fourth modified Dirichlet kernel and that is
one of the building blocks for the 4D complex exponential. I just
wanted to see how it looked in the DESMOS package and after that I
added up the first 200 terms.
Now my scientific
research did arrive at the next conclusion: These tits are likely
fake tits and the robots do not have a face because they come from
a computer game named Atomic Heart.
May be now is the
right time to split so we can go our own way in parallel universes
and as always thanks for your attention.
(19 Jan 2024) Wow man how terrible cold is it
over here! During daytime about +1 degree Celcius while in the
middle of the night temperatures get as cold as minus one or even
TWO degrees BELOW ZERO!
I don't think much Russians will read this
but if you are sitting there without heating and or electricity, I
understand your troubles! Wow man minus 25 or even minus 30 sounds
just like that horrible minus 1 we have over here!
May be Russians can find peace of heart by
understanding that if something does not kill you, it will only
make you stronger. Just like a bottle of Vodka, just one bottle
does not kill you so it makes you so strong that you think like
"Why not another bottle?"
I have an extra picture but I did not want to
delete it because may be that is considered as genocide on
snowmen, a practice that is illegal of course. So here it is:
But lets go to the two items of
today:
Item 1) Two very different video's about and
from Ukraine.
Item 2) Finally the latest math post is finished.
Item 1) Two very
different video's about and from Ukraine.
The first video is from Anna from Ukraine.
It's a bit more emotional but also very charming. It's also a bit
of a motivation that we must keep on helping Ukraine and not tire
for no reason at all.
After all it took me about 11 years before I
had my stomach full of the War on Terror and this war isn't even
two years old. Click on Anna's picture to see her
video:
Video title: DAILY EXPLOSIONS IN RUSSIA – ST. PETERSBURG BLOWN UP. Vlog 579: War in Ukraine
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dq3BepTPmOs
Yes I haven't read that news but it seems to
blow up in St. Petersburg because of UA drones or may be local
Russians that want to get rid of their government.
__________
The next video is from Paul from the video
channel Combat Veteran Reacts. It is very interesting because this
video highlights a bit the data streams you need in combat in this
21-th century.
Paul himself has fought in Afghanistan so
that was likely a decade ago or so and he tells how difficult it
often was to make sure you have communications with different
military posts over there.
Even longer ago, in the beginning of the
1980-ties I was a soldier myself working in what we name 'Verbindingen'.
Translated that would be lines of communication but those words
are also used for just transporting all kinds of stuff. Anyway I
had a telex with encryption and one or two radio channels with
unencrypted stuff.
The telephone was done by rolling out hundreds of meters of cables
and everywhere there were telephonists who's job it was to plug in
the cables so the telephone calls could reach their target
destination.
All in all this was not much bytes per second but it was better
compared to a situation where you had no telex, radio or telephone
at all...
Right now in Ukraine they use systems like
Starlink and those connection speeds are just like my own internet
connection. Compared to how fast I could type text on my telex
back in time, this is a very huge improvement.
I think Paul is a bit over the top in his
intro that Ukrainians have leapfrogged over US and NATO command
centers. Eventually those command centers will pick up but in the
military things often don't go that fast.
And of course in the military everything has to be of 'military
grade' for the obvious reasons, making the stuff military grade is
a long process in itself. After that militaries have to buy it and
that can also take a long time before it is actually used.
By no means this is a criticism of Western militaries, this is
just how it works. They always have limited means because it's
taxpayer money and as such it is better to think a bit longer
before you spend that taxpayer money...
Click on the picture for the video from
Paul:
Video title: Ex-US Soldiers: Ukr Command Posts BETTER Than US!
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfzkkFLTaiw
In the end things will pick up, compare it
for example to 10 Sept 2001: There was no video surveillance of
the Pentagon building itself. And now there likely is, so in the
end all militaries can evolve if needed...
Item 2) Finally the
latest math post is finished.
Yesterday I finally published the latest math
post and I checked on the post before that and it was published on
20 Dec last year. So this post although it's math at the surface
is not very deep, it took me a bit long to write.
Anyway it's seven pictures long and an
additional 3 extra figures, so all in all 10 images and for what?
Well for giving two parametrization of an ellipse...
May be this is an indication I am getting
senile while on the other hand now I finally have some math that
math professors could understand (complex analysis in a flat
plane) it is important that no flaws are there.
After all these years it's a bit sad for me
that 3D complex numbers have never picked up any notice. Well it
is what it is and I am one hundred % through with the
(professional) math community.
If they are to stupid and/or unwilling to
think about higher dimensional complex numbers, that is something
I have to accept.
Anyway the latest post is finally there, I
also found a new cute looking female robot so click on the picture
to land at the latest post if you want to read it:
Math post title: Two parametrizations for the ‘unit’ ellipse in the i^2 = -1 + i kind of multiplication.
Lets leave it with that, till updates.
(17 Jan 2024) No intro, only two items.
Item 1) Russian AWACS down & Inside
Russia on utilities breakdown.
Item 2) Finally it's finished but it's not yet published yet.
Item 1) Russian
AWACS down & Inside Russia on utilities breakdown.
It's already a few days in the news but it
seems that a Russian version of the AWACS system plus a huge
command air plane were destroyed respectively damaged.
So that's the second AWACS they lost if
memory serves, it seems they have something like 10 left but only
about 6 in active duty. If this AWACS tactical detail is true, in
that case it is important the economical sanctions do their work
and they can't rebuild such a plane in say the rest of this
century...
Here is a newfeed from the BBC:
Article title: Ukraine says it shot down Russian A-50 spy plane
Link used: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-67978739
Below you see that so called damaged tail of
the command plane. As the BBC also mentioned these details are
hard to verify given just one picture.
Konstantin from the video channel Inside
Russia had a good video out explaining the finer details behind
all those breakdowns of utilities they have over there in Russia.
In my memory Konstantin is an economist but
in the video he tells that he knows a bit about electrical
equipment. After all he bought some stuff from Siemens and if you
buy stuff like that you must understand what you buy. And may be
he is an economist too, I just don't know but the video is very
interesting.
Anyway for me it is very interesting because
I would like to see a breakdown of the Russian military forces to
the extend that they can no longer do to any other EU nation what
they are doing to Ukraine.
As such all these breakdowns in Russian
utilities like warm water and electricity are a welcome
development as far as I am concerned. Of course the weather is
also very helpful, likely without the severity of this winter the
breakdown would be much less. So for that I want to thank the
Almighty for this great help because who else to say thanks
against?
Click on the video from Inside Russia, as you
see it's 23 minutes long:
Video title: RUSSIANS ARE FREEZING! | In January 2024 The Utility Industry Collapses.
Link used:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4dduEpy4SM
The Ai generated picture of Joe Biden
discharging his presidential duties is funny. It looks like Ai is
here to stay, but for the human artists it is of course a bad
thing that people can make pictures with just a few lines of
text...
Lets go to the next item.
Item 2) Finally it's
finished but it's not yet published yet.
Yesterday I finally finished the work on the
latest math post. Given the fact I am actually doing are relative
simple thing, only give parametrizations for the covering of an
interesting ellipse, it tool a lot of time to write it all
out.
It has also become amazingly long: Seven
pictures of 550x1100 pixels and three extra figures to explain
some important details. Since I now have written over 250 math
posts of course it has happened before posts became rather long.
But that covered much more math so to say, this is only just two
parametrizations of the same ellipse...
On the other hand there are all kinds of
reasons as why this post became so long. The first parametrization
is based on finding the logarithm of the number i that
rules the (elliptical) complex multiplication. The rule says that i^2
= -1 + i so it is a bit different from the complex plane where we
have i^2 = -1.
With this small modification of the way the
complex multiplication works we now have the very interesting
property that i^3 = -1. That gave me the idea for the
second way of finding or crafting a parametrization: See what you
get if you project the three dimensional complex exponential (a
circle) on the xy-plane.
And that was an interesting discovery: You
get the same ellipse!
So the first way of crafting the
parametrization was an invention because you have to work often
hard and long to find the logarithm of imaginary units. And the
second parametrization was a discovery.
Now often in weird Youtube video's you see
overpaid academics ask each other that stupid question: Is
mathematics invented or discovered? That is a stupid
question, compare it to say roads. Are roads made from asphalt or
from stones?
The question if math is discovered or
invented is rather easy to answer:
If you work hard and long to get some desired
result, this is clearly an invented piece of math. You often need
a lot of time for that.
A discovery on the other hand is if you just 'try some stuff out'
and that solves the whole fucking problem. It's just a few second
or minutes of trying and such mathematical results are classified
by me as discoveries.
Anyway in the picture below you see the two
parametrizations at the top and bottom of the picture. The female
robot thing is from pixabay, it is for free use so I do not need
to pillage & plunder images because it's free anyway... And
don't forget that in the picture below i^2 = -1 + i and not
just -1.
If you would ask me what parametrization I
like the most, that is hard to say. Of course I like it when after
finding a number tau I also can figure out how that complex
exponential works.
But if you just 'do some stuff' in a short
time frame and you find or discover the second parametrization,
that is also cute.
Lets leave it with that, thanks for not
falling asleep during my incoherent ramblings. So see you in a
next update.
(12 Jan 2024) Only one item for this update
because I still haven't finished the new math post while I also
have no fresh stuff for a rant against weird physics professors
that think electrons are tiny magnets. No wondering as why the
physics professors themselves can't see the wrongs with that idea,
the idea that electrons 'must be' tiny magnets without any
experimental validation. So no rant against that class of
incompetent professorial parasitic physics people, no why rant
against those that are mathematical inferior beings that are too
stupid to understand they have a problem...;) ?
There is an old song from the sixties titled
"No milk today, my love has gone away" and as such I can
only sing "No rant today, my brain has gone away".
Therefore only a bit of Ukraine related stuff
in this update:
Item 1) Random UA related stuff.
Item 1) Random UA
related stuff.
Random thing 1: It was reported that in the
USA about one billion in military aid to Ukraine was not tracked
properly. Ok every billion in that category is a billion to much
but on the scale of things I would say the one billion is a good
number. If it later turns out that one billion was just the tip of
the iceberg I might change opinion but for now this does not sound
like a bad number.
Corruption. Now a lot of people always say
that Ukraine is so corrupt but in this entire war as far as I know
not much military gear has been stolen or sold on black markets.
In the beginning of the war you had a few of those pictures from
anti tank boom stuff, but if checked it were always just Russians
trying some weird Russian stuff.
For example I have heard of no infantry
transport vehicle being sold for the value of it's scrap metals.
So from the point of view of corruption, it could be much much
worse.
Source Axios: Over $1B of U.S. military aid to Ukraine not properly tracked: Pentagon report.
Link used:
https://www.axios.com/2024/01/11/us-military-aid-ukraine-track-report
__________
Random thing 2: Were Russian casualties in
the long Sovjet-Afghanistan war really that low? This war happened
a long time ago when I was a soldier myself and at the time it was
a big thing. In this old military conflict there was a guy named
Osama bin Laden why studied all that war stuff a little bit and
arrived over the years at the conclusion that the USA was only
using the mujahedin in order to fight Russia... But those were
other times.
Anyway, here is a quote from a wiki. You must
not compare that to the present 300+ thousand Russians because
they are counted a casualties. So that dead and wounded so it's
not over 300 thousand deaths. But here is the quote:
The total official fatalities of the Soviet Armed Forces, frontier, and internal security troops came to
14,453. Other estimates give a figure of 26,000 killed Soviet soldiers.
A wiki: Soviet–Afghan War
Link used:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet%E2%80%93Afghan_War#Impact
Ok now it is about time for a nice picture, I
think this was from the Axios report. This shows how we, decadent
fascist homosexual Europeans think when we hear the words
"Winter" and "Russia":
I still don't understand why we are
"decadent" but at some circles in the Kremlin they seem
to think that. That's bit strange because if you would ask me what
subspecies is decadent I would say the children of the Russian
elites. Or the kids of those weird Russians with all their super
yachts, I mean that is decadent.
__________
Random thing number 3: A Youtube channel
named Military & History.
It is from a German guy and the German
tradition is just like me that we want to think through a lot of
stuff and we always want validation and proof and not jump to
conclusions too fast.
This channel is more or less a typical German
way of doing stuff, it is very very different from say those war
channels done by Americans. Also you must like it a bit when about
20 minutes long it only goes about (possible) changes in the long
front in Ukraine. So even I do not watch all those front moves
every day but only every now and then, and for that this channel
is rather reliable in what it posts.
Video title: "We lose 90% of our Heavy Equipment" Russian Blogger Admits!
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wii1wvF2JtA
That was it more or less for this update. We
are still in the waiting phase of more help for Ukraine comes
forward from the EU and USA but for the time being there are
'political problems' so to say.
As always thanks for your
attention.
(10 Jan 2024) It's also getting very cold
over here: By day minus one and by night minus 4 or 5 degrees
Celcius... So that's not much but of course already in a
neighboring province named Friesland they already prepare a bit
for a famous 200 km ice skating event. Let hope it will go on, the
skating I mean.
Weather forecasts say where I live we could
get about 20 cm of snow. Bah, I don't mind if it freezes but all
that snow is much more irritating. Anyway two items for today so
lets go:
Item 1) UA air defense ammo shortage &
drone production surplus.
Item 2) Some cute math & a Sabine video.
Item 1) UA air
defense ammo shortage & drone production surplus.
These days more and more if I want to read
some news about Ukraine I have to search for it. In the past it
was much more in the foreground of the news, so is there too a bit
of tiredness going on?
Two Reuters reports for today, there are a
few good photo's in it. There is a shortage in air defense
ammo:
Ukraine has deficit of anti-aircraft guided missiles - air force
Link used:
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-has-deficit-anti-
aircraft-guided-missiles-air-force-2024-01-09/
You can already read in the success rate of
downed Russian rockets and drones that it starts to bite. The next
report is a bit more uplifting:
The Ukrainians produce more drones as there
are funds to buy them. Of course that is a much better situation
compared to when there are plenty of funds but nothing to
buy...
Report title: Ukraine producing more drones than state can purchase, minister says.
Link used: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-producing-
more-drones-than-state-can-purchase-minister-says-2024-01-09/
Since the Reuters photo's were clearly
copyright protected for once I decided not to use such stuff. So
that's why the above photo is not a winter photo. At the end of
this item I wish the US soldiers warm feet, at least for a few
minutes a day... Winter can be a rough rough thing.
Lets go to the next item.
Item 2) Some cute
math & a Sabine video.
My progress with the new math post goes
amazingly slow. That's not a problem because it is just a nice
hobby and it gives a bit of time so I can ask myself why that
fucking ellipse just doesn't go away?
I hope most of my readers know that if you
project a circle on a plane under some angle, you mostly get an
ellipse. So one day I decided to project the three dimensional
complex exponential on the xy-plane.
That might sound complicated math talk but
all I do is leave the z-coordinates out or declare them
zero. To my surprise there was that ellipse again: x^2 +
xy + y^2 = 1. Actually it was not that one but it had
the same shape.
Ok ok there might be some math reasons as why
my good old 3D complex exponentials get projected on this
particular elliptic shape. They both love the third power of
imaginary units to be one or minus one...
After all on the ellipse we have an imaginary
unit i with the interesting property that i^3 = -1.
As such powers of i have a period of six just like the
complex multiplication in three dimensions.
Anyway, here is how I found that
parametrization with the strange + 0.5 in it that I showed you a
few weeks ago:
So that's how I found that result, now all I
need to do is write out the new post and go on to drink another
pint of beer...);
__________
May be it is time to go to the video from
Sabine Hossenfelder. I like Sabine a lot because at least she can
be a bit critical on say the study of quantum particles like they
do at say CERN.
So that is a good thing. But she is also a
believer in electron spin as a tiny magnet, so that is a bad
thing.
Therefore since it is now the year 2024 I
once more used that famous background "The Scream" for
saying "No, no, no!" albeit now in German.
So as always click on the picture for the
video, the video itself is very interesting because just like
everyone else I too would love it if the so called "Moore's
law" is there just a few years longer.
Video title: This New Semiconductor Could Revolutionize Computing
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXBtPmVrES4
That was it for this update, so no rant upon you cannot flip
the spin of an electron. No, I want a pint and not write a rant...
(05 Jan 2024) The two items for this update
are:
Item 1) Safe skies over paradise?
Item 2) Finally that math picture finished...
Item 1) Safe skies
over paradise?
Ok ok if you are an Ukrainian you might feel
annoyed by such a title while over there they had two huge
barrages of Russian rockets and Iranian drones. Anyway it is not
meant to be annoying but I hardly had any time today to follow the
news.
So only at 23.00 yesterday I could find a few
minutes and check the headlines.
Without doubt one of the Russian goals was of
course to see if they could overload the Ukrainian air defenses.
And that is understandable but with such an attitude that comes
with a price: The more things like Kinzhals get successfully shot
from the skies, the more can be learned from the data flowing from
that.
Like said before, for us this is important
because those hyperspeed missiles also have a nuclear capability
so if those Patriot systems get upgraded again and again, may be
in a future year we will be glad to have such anti Kinghals fire
power.
Likely the next picture shows what the
Ukrainians made from it:
I only read a news article from the business
insider, I got the picture from above from there too. Now we are
in an environment where politics might turn away from Ukraine I
want to emphasize once more we have a clear vested interest
ourselves in such knowledge.
After all every nuclear bomb shot from the
skies is a lot of human suffering less. But try to explain that to
the Hungarian weirdo or to those USA republicans that tie closure
of the border with Mexico to their UA aid package...
Winston Churchill once remarked that the USA
always did the right thing after exhausting all other
possibilities. Let's hope this time it is not different from those
long lost years dating back to WWII.
Anyway click on the picture for the Business
Insider article that explains why those battlefield data from
Ukraine have value to us. Don't forget the very first report of a
Kinzhal shot down was just after the Patriot systems getting an
upgrade. I am not saying the first Kinzhal was shot down because
of that upgrade because I have no such proof for such a claim. And
if the Patriot upgrade was important into brining down the first
Kinzhal, that will be classified information anyway so it is not accessible
by my anyhow...
Article title: Shooting down Russia's overhyped missiles with Patriots is a win for more than just Ukraine. The war is an 'intelligence bonanza' for the West.
The link to the article is too long to post,
if it does not work try to remove the end where it reads: ?international=true&r=US&IR=T
At last we must not forget these Russian
rocket attacks do a lot of damage to real people living in real
houses. So I might sound coldhearted by talking about military
data that could be beneficial to us, but war is not a thing you
should do with too much emotion anyway. It must be efficient and
often you need a cold cold heart for that...
Item 2) Finally that
math picture finished...
Last week I already wanted to make the
picture below but I did not have enough time. Last Tuesday I
wanted to post this picture but then that video with the two main
faults in the Stern-Gerlach experiment came along. So I postponed
making the picture once more.
After all if in just one video you have all
that crap physics professors believe is true, that pushes away my
math temporarily. The two main faults are of course the way they
calculate the force on an electron due to magnetism. The other
main fault is likely they think measuring electron spin is a
probabilistic thing while I think electrons are magnetic monopoles
that can never 'flip their spin state'.
So all that quantum computer crap based on
qubits based on electron spin will never work because those qubits
can't change their spin state. Now try to explain that to Viktor
Orban from Hungary or for that matter any dumb shallow thinking
physics professor... You will fail!
__________
Yesterday I finally made the picture, it is
the complex exponential for a complex plane that is ruled by i^2
= -1 + i. So it is a bit different from the usual complex
plane that is ruled by i^2 = -1.
I've shown you a few parametrizations of the
unit ellipse before but this one below is solely based on the
number tau. The number tau is the logarithm of the imaginary unit i.
So this is how it looks:
That was it for this update. Thanks for your
attention and once more a happy 2024. Let me try to upload my
garbage to the biggest garbage can humanity has: The
internet.
(03 Jan 2024) Of course a happy new year to
all. It's late already over here so lets go to the two items for
this update.
Item 1) Joe Blogs on the Russian economy,
ruble & stuff.
Item 2) One video with the two main faults from the SG experiment.
Item 1) Joe Blogs on
the Russian economy, ruble & stuff.
The Wall Street Journal or so had declared
Putin a winner of 2023 because Russia was so good at evading
sanctions. It sounded like Joe was a bit annoyed by that because
he comes with a long analysis from Yale that makes a bit more
sense.
But sometimes you read very dumb stuff. So as
lately the Russian central bank lifted it's main interest rate
from 15% to 16% if I remember it correctly. To my surprise I came
across a piece of news with the title "Russian economy runs
risk of overheating".
More stupid as that is hard imagine, the rates are that high to
protect the value of the ruble. There are all kinds of capital
controls in place as for example Russian companies that have
reserves in foreign currencies have to convert a huge part into
ruble. Again that is needed to support the ruble.
And yes, inflation can easily occur when the
economy is overheated. But in my view the rising costs of imports
are a much larger part of explaining the Russian inflation. Oh the
other hand, there seems to be a labor shortage in Russia, and that
can have inflationary consequences too.
Anyway, click on the picture to see the
video:
Video title: RUSSIAN Ruble is Dead as a Currency - Yale SOM Lists Reasons Why 2023 Was a Disaster for Russia
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hf3bydzXjwQ
As always Joe's titles are always a bit over
the top.
And there are new economical sanctions
related to the Russian exports of gold. I have no idea how bit
that trade is so that is something to keep an eye on.
Also a lot of stuff still needs to fall in
deeper over time. For example the cannibalization of all those air
planes they have stolen. Without new spareparts they have to scrap
entire planes in usage for spare parts. That is also a thing to
watch in say the next 15 years...
Lets go to the next item.
Item 2) One video
with the two main faults from the SG experiment.
As far as I remember this is the very first
video that I see in all those years that has the two main faults
in just one video. For people that do not know waht a SG
experiment is: That's the famous Stern-Gerlach experiment from the
year 1922. Informally said it was the discovery of electron spin.
The first fault is the idea this only works
if the magnetic field has a gradient. They calculate a force via
taking a spatial derivative and that's it.
The problem my dear reader is easy to
understand: Electrons are accelerated by magnetic fields while
they think the electron is a tiny magnet. But if you hold a bar
magnet of say 10 cm long in an inhomogeneous magnetic field, you
can imagine feeling a net force. Because both poles of your bar
magnet feel different forces resulting in a net force into some
direction.
But if you take a bar magnet of the same strength
but it is now 20 cm long, if you hold that in the same
non-constant magnetic field you must feel more net force.
To put it simple: If the electron only feels
a net force on it's tiny magnetic poles, the net force should take
into account the distance between the poles. So you must multiply
the gradient against this tiny distance and that should be your
basis of estimating the net force on the electron.
And don't forget: In the SG experiment it is
one single electron that is responsible for the separation of the
beam of silver atoms into the two magnetic states known as
electron spin.
All that stuff with tiny dipole magnets, it
makes not much sense. If you do not take into account the electron
size, its all crap.
__________
The second fault is at the bottom of the
picture below: Repeated SG experiments. This is also a thing that
only lives in the imagination or in the brains of the physics
professionals. There is no experimental evidence you can flip the
spin of a single electron, there are only animations of how this
is supposed to work.
My dear reader, very likely this entire year
I will keep on thinking that electrons are magnetic monopoles and
that this magnetic charge is as permanent as the electric charge
an electron has.
Hey fucking physics community: Can you give
me in this new year 2024 only one experiment that proves or
validates your weird idea's upon electrons being tiny magnets?
Of course my dear reader they won't because
they don't have it.
It's about time to go to the video:
Video title: Know This, If You Want to Understand Quantum Mechanics! | Stern-Gerlach Experiment | Quantum Theory
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmAu4Vpdn_c
For myself speaking it is funny I can start
this new year with a video with the two main faults in it. In the
meantime I think all physics professors will keep on thinking this
entire year that electrons are tiny magnets. That is also funny;
how can you be so stupid for so long?
End of this update & have a good
year.
(29 Dec 2023) The last update of the year
2023 already. Anyway a happy new year to all. And lets not get
sentimental like "Oh oh another year closer to my
coffin!" No, why should we do that?
Anyway two items for today:
Item 1) Russian reserves / UA F-16
speculation / NATO evolution.
Item 2) WTF are left and right handed electrons?
Item 1) Russian
reserves / UA F-16 speculation / NATO evolution.
There was some news that the USA wants to
confiscate the roughly 300 billion US$ in Russian assets that are
held outside Russia. In the beginning of the war I was very much
in favor of that. Later I thought you must avoid a situation where
central banks are afraid to park stuff in other
places.
Once investors in my country lost a total
amount of say the reserves of the Dutch central bank to Russia.
They held bonds that among other things financed the railroad
system over there. Then came the revolution in Russia and the
communists declared all payments void.
So my dear Russia, when it comes to this
small transfer of money let it be known you can recover from this.
Reuters has a bit more on this:
What and where are Russia's $300 billion in reserves frozen in the
West?
Link used: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/what-
where-are-russias-300-billion-reserves-frozen-west-2023-12-28/
Very different: The channel Combat Vet Reacts
has a funny video out with a bit of the speculation of F-16's are
already at work in Ukraine. Last update I said I didn't think so.
All I know about now the trainees have stopped flying on fly
simulators and go to Denmark for the real flight lessons.
All in all I expect that if there is news,
the news is reliable. On the other hand we must not make the
Russians wiser as is needed. And may be my government isn't lying
at all.
May be it is true there is a group going to Denmark.
May be it is true there are still language lessons going on in the
UK.
And the pilots already gone to Ukraine?
Oh oops, we cannot talk about that because that is confidential
info.
Well whatever it was that downed a bunch of
Russian aircraft, it still is impressive. Here is Paul his
video:
Video title: Ukr Airforce is Suddenly VERY Lethal! F-16s In the Air?
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4Jwt5nva4s
Deutsch Welle had a short video on how NATO
is changing. No longer in war plans and stuff like that the enemy
is not some hypothetical country. No, it's now explicit Russia.
And that is indeed a change. Back in the 1980-ties when I was a
soldier it was also only implicit understood that the enemy was
Russia. Or better as it was in those days: The USSR and the
Eastern EU nations known as Warsaw Pact.
Here is the video:
Video title: NATO makes major changes to address new threats | DW News
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJezAVIIxDY
Lets go to the next item.
Item 2) WTF are left
and right handed electrons?
I have never before written about this
because for me this is so crazy that for me it is hard to comment
upon. If you like me think that electrons have a permanent
monopole magnetic charge, just like their electric charge, the
whole 'definition' of left & right handedness in electrons is
totally crazy.
The Ai generated Aztec girl has nothing to do
with it. At the bottom of the picture you see a 'definition'. The
letter p refers to the (linear) momentum of the electron.
So the electron moves in the direction of the green arrows.
The physics professors believe that electrons are tiny magnets and
these magnetic fields point into the direction S. This S
is what they name the spin of the electron.
Now why is this totally crazy? Well we are
always told that spin is either up or down when a vertical
magnetic field is applied. Of course electrons move in all
directions so what happens if an actual electron moves in a
direction different from that magnetic field?
Once more: This is all fucked up crap.
Electrons have a permanent magnetic charge because otherwise
molecules could not bind via electron pairs.
There are many ways to confirm the monopole
character of electrons in say a chemistry lab setting:
You must have some ways of separating the
electrons depending on their spin state. Look or study a
particular chemical reaction when it is deprived from say the spin
down electrons.
If such chemical reactions are very different
or even just don't happen under deprivation, that validates
electron spin state is a permanent feature. And not some arrow
just pointing into some direction...
And if the physics professionals aren't weird
enough, they name this handiness property a chiral thing. Here is
the source of the picture that 'defines' electron left or right
handiness:
Chirality (physics)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chirality_(physics)
I think it is time to split and I hope you
will have a pleasant transition into the year 2024. Thanks for
your attention and make sure you do not need professional medical
help when trying to understand electron
handiness.
Till next year.
(27 Dec 2023) It's late, I am a bit tired so
lets go to our items.
Item 1) Wow five planes & a rubber boat?
Novotjerkassk kaput.
Item 2) Tiny bit of math and an old horrible video on spin stuff.
Item 1) Wow five
planes & a rubber boat? Novotjerkassk kaput.
Well that was some Christmas weekend! Five
Russian planes down and likely less of those glider bombs? That
brings a smile to my face... Some observes say the last Patriot
system did it while other already speculated upon the F16. For
myself speaking I have no idea but F16 seems to be out of the
question likely. Pilot training takes a lot of time...
On top of that another Russian navy ship
kaput. The name is so horrible to me that I had to write it down,
it's the Novotsjerkassk. Reports varied from "Damaged with
one person dead" to "Almost completely
vaporized".
Anyway it was a big boom.
Lets go to the next item.
Item 2) Tiny bit of
math and an old horrible video on spin stuff.
I made another parametrization from that
ellipse you saw around coming here lately. This ellipse goes
through all powers of i where the multiplication now is
ruled by i^2 = -1 + i.
This ellipse is the complex exponential for
this kind of a complex plane. I think it's a cute complex plane
because you now have i^3 = -1.
Anyway in the last post on the other website
we took that beautiful function named the logarithm from our
imaginary unit i and as such we got a number named tau. You might
say so what? But if you just like me crazy enough you need this
number to find those parametrizations.
By the way, most people who had a bit of math
have some rudimentary understanding of what a parametrization is.
Some math expression depends on some number named a parameter, as
such I do not like it very much to name the stuff below a
parametrization. It is more a 'cover in time' but nobody uses that
so lets use the word parametrization.
This parametrization should be the same as
given last week, but I was to lazy to prove it. And also I didn't
have time for that. But it should be the same. At last I want to
remark the above parametrization has period two pi while the one
from last week has period six. If you want to prove for yourself
these two parametrizations are the same, of course you must adjust
the stuff to having the same period...
__________
Electron time! I found an old video from 8
years back and it contains a few fantasies upon magnons and spin
waves. I selected the video because it is so breathtaking stupid:
They want to send so called spin waves through an insulator.
Now why is that so very stupid?
Well in my world the spin of the electron is
not spin but monopole magnetic charge. As such there is a 'spin
current' if in a particular direction more north pole electrons
move as the south pole electrons.
Physics professors say there is no spin
current in say a copper wire if both spin up and spin down
electrons travel in the same direction. And they never say it explicitly
but if they talk about spin current they always mean a net
effect.
So they understand something is going on
here, in their world or mind the electrons are tiny magnets that
just happen to point their magnetic axis into a particular
direction the name 'up' or 'down'. For them it is one of the
mysteries of quantum physics: It's a vector but it can point only
up or down.
These people are crazy not even realizing
there is just no experimental proof anywhere that says electrons
are indeed tiny (bipolar) magnets. These people are crazy because
they don't see or talk about this heap on illogical nonsense like
electron pairs must have opposite spins.
Talking out of their necks is the main way to
pass the time over there...
It takes only two minutes to view the next
video, as always click on the picture to land at the video. The
video itself is from the FOM archive of the university of Utrecht,
so it might be older as 8 years.
Video title: Magnon spintronics
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-D5ja7Kmos
That was it, thanks for your attention.
(22 Dec 2023) We had a storm named Pia over
here but it did not do much damage. In Prague they had a crazy
shootout at a university with something like over 15 people dead.
The details from Prague are a bit strange, it was done by a
student that did not seem to have any trouble... So it was a weird
day when it came to the news.
Item 1) Over 80 thousand Russian soldiers in
the Bakhmut area? Why?
Item 2) New math post & Don Lincoln talking out of this neck.
Item 1) Over 80
thousand Russian soldiers in the Bakhmut area? Why?
The channel Reporting From Ukraine reported
that someone else has reported that there were about 80 thousand
Russian troops in the neighborhood of Bakhmut. The Wagner folks
were also back so they are now more or less integrated into the
Russian army.
I have no idea how reliable this information
is all in all but as the video says 80 thousand is about double
the 40 thousand from the Avdiivka (or how you spell that name)
region. If the information is more or less correct it is likely
the Russians are planning more offensives in this winter.
Click on the picture to land as the
video:
The title is a bit over the top & it's
even in ALLCAPS!!!!!!!!
Video title: 20 Dec: IT STARTED! THE BIGGEST BATTLE OF THE WAR. RUSSIANS DEPLOY 80’000 TROOPS.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8f9HvfmCzY
If I remember it correctly at date 5 Feb next
year the EU will try again to get some serious aid package for
Ukraine done. Of course Hungary stays the crazy wildcard on this.
So we have to wait and see how this all evolves over time...
Item 2) New math post
& Don Lincoln talking out of this neck.
The latest math post is about finding the
logarithm of an imaginary unit named i. But the way the
multiplication now works is a bit different, again I used that i^2
= -1 + i way of multiplying numbers from the plane.
In math the logarithm, say log(x), has
the feature that it's derivative equals 1/x. You can also
use that the other way around: If you don't have any idea what the
log is, you can always try to integrate the inverse.
That's basically what I am doing in the new
post and for that you also need to find the inverse of such
complex numbers. And I was pleased we had to divide by the
determinant making once more chopped meat of the belief that math
professors have it is all about norms.
In itself the new post is not very important
because there are also other ways to find the logarithm. It's
importance lies in the fact you can integrate on such spaces like
that where the multiplication is clearly different from the good
old complex plane.
So if you are interested in math like that,
click on the picture to land at the new post on the other
website:
Title of the new post:An inverse and a number tau for the
i^2 = -1 + i multiplication.
Link used:
https://3dcomplexnumbers.net/2023/12/20/an-inverse-and-
a-number-tau-for-the-i2-1-i-multiplication/
__________
Electron time! If you like me think that
electrons are magnetic monopoles and not tiny (bipolar) magnets,
in that case how do permanent magnets work? One way of making
permanent magnets goes as follows, let use iron:
A piece of iron is heated above the Curie
temperature. A strong magnetic field is applied and very slowly
the iron is cooled. After that the magnet is ready for use, may be
a bit of sanding, polishing are painting and it's ready.
Why does it work? Well iron has four unpaired
electrons in it's inner shells. The Curie temperature is so high
that these electrons come slammed loosed from all that thermal
energy. The magnetic field ensures that the monopole electrons get
separated and when it all cools down the electrons land in their
inner electron orbitals. (If I remember it correctly it were the
d-orbitals).
So that is why permanent magnets are
permanent: the electrons have a permanent monopole magnetic
charge, their spins cannot flip, and now there are more north-pole
charged electrons in the north pole. And vice verse for the south
pole.
This also means that if you have a machine
that can make permanent magnets, if the direction of the applied
magnetic field is say from the left to the right. In that case the
permanent magnet should have it's magnetism from the right to the
left...
For years and years I am looking for this detail to be validated,
but people don't speak much about a technical thing like making
permanent magnets...
__________
Ok, lets fly Don Lincoln from Fermilabs into
this homepage: Don Lincoln is clearly a guy that likes it to hear
to his own voice speaking. Well that is not illegal or so but he
clearly is a shallow thinker never realizing there are all kinds
of deep deep problems and inconsistencies with viewing electrons
as tiny magnets.
I selected the next screen shot because it
also contained so called magnetic domains that are found in
magnetic metals. Back in Feb 2017 during one day of deep thinking
related to a problem from IBM with nano wires I was standing
outside and found the likely answor: Magnetic domains domains have
a surplus of one the the two kinds of electrons. And the domain
walls are actively keeping these magnetic charges separated.
Well Feb 2017 is over 6 years ago and people
like Don Lincoln just keep on talking out of their overpaid but
silly necks. Likely at Fermilab they have one of those so called
Kerr microscopes. With a Kerr microscope you can see the magnetic
domains of a material like iron and observe how it changes when
you apply a magnetic field.
Of course they never do that because these
people live in a world where all things magnetic has to be
explained via tiny magnets, Gauss his law for magnetism or
whatever what. They live in their world and I live in mine and
after so many years I am no longer interested in serious
communication or so.
This Lincoln guy even does not have his
domains correctly: This kind of configuration he shows cannot
exist if adjacent domains always must have opposite spins.
I think this is a good example how all this
shallow thinking works in practice. The words as spoken by the Don
sound good but if you think a bit longer there is all that crap
and all these inconsistencies. Inconsistencies like the electron
pair must have opposite spins, people like Don Lincoln buy all
that crap with a happy smile...
Click on the picture for the video where Don
Lincoln explains permanent magnetism:
Video title: How do magnets work?
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7ndBIL402Q
That was it for this update, thanks for not
falling asleep while I rant on about electron spin. So thanks for
your attention.
(20 Dec 2023) In my own country the first thunder strikes
of our future government are heard: We all get cheaper health care
and that is paid for by an extra tax on the banks... As far as I
know now, this 'cheaper' health care costs 6 billion € where the
new bank tax will bring in 150 million or so?
My estimate is it is going to be a disaster,
this new government if it goes through will be a bunch of weird
and dumb people driving our government debt up fast & furious.
Well that is what the Dutch people voted for I just guess...
But for the rest of this world: May be the
next few years you have to count the Dutch out. Instead of a
careful kind of thinking you will get cheap populism, stupid
slogans and no serious stuff anyway...
Two items for today:
Item 1) BBC docu: They call us meat.
Item 2) Two cute integrals for a number named tau.
Item 1) BBC docu:
They call us meat.
Oh shit I was thinking there was a vote on UA
aid in the USA this week. But that's likely not the case since
just a few hours before writing this we had a Reuters report
saying:
White House plans one more Ukraine aid package, then up to Congress
Link used: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/white-house-plans-one-
more-ukraine-aid-package-then-up-congress-2023-12-19/
A few times I observed US republicans
demanding there would be a strategy delivered that apparently was
not done by the White House all this time... Well as my little
corner of the world is concerned the long term thing is to degrade
the Russian military to the point where it cannot do to another
European nation what they are now doing to Ukraine.
And why don't the US republicans enjoy the
daily tactical news of just another 1000 dead Russian soldiers?
Have they gone crazy or so?
Well likely with Christmas impending,
somewhere next year the vote will take place. So lets wait and see
what it will be.
__________
The BBC had an interesting video out were
they try to investigate what happened to some Russian elite
marines. That is a lot of work of course but as so often a lot of
them got killed.
Last week I showed you that US estimate where
87% of the size of the initial invading forces. I do not know how
long they measured 'initial invading forces' but total wiped out
was over 300 thousand Russians.
But with numbers like that the memory falls
out of your organization like we have here the Russian army. If
everybody with a little bit experience is dead or wounded and
there's only new recruits left, you basically have an army with
limited memory.
The next link is the short version, I did not
see it but there is also a version of about one hour. Just look it
up if you are interested in the beautiful life of Russian soldiers
and their romantic dead or wounded end. Click on the picture for
the video:
Video title: Russia’s elite marines sent into death trap in Ukraine | BBC News.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RO_dPIYzbkE
And if you think about those hundreds and
hundreds of dear Russian corpses covering the Ukrainian landscape,
all that meat... I admire the Russians that they care so much
about Ukrainian wildlife, after all in the cold winter meat eating
animals must have something to eat or not? And when the beautiful
Ukrainian spring arrives, the flies must have some place to put
their eggs in. It is all so romantic: Russians feeding Ukraine
wildlife and helping Ukraine flies with having a happy life...
May be we should go to the next item:
Item 2) Two cute
integrals for a number named tau.
Lets first recap how we arrived in all that
math in the plane with elliptical and hyperbolic multiplications.
Well this year I started developing so called general theory so
that you can make complex numbers in any dimension.
In itself such general theory is much more boring but it was still
funny for me to write it down. As such I wrote the second post on
general theory:
General theory Part 2: On a matrix named big E.
That was on 13 Oct so just over two months
back. After that I wrote one more post in the general stuff. In
the big E post I simply said that you could experiment with it for
yourself and try if you can find some complex analysis.
I realized that of course this would be a
total disaster if left to the professional math professors. So
that is why I came up with that two dimensional multiplication
that I named the "Golden ratio multiplication" where the
imaginary unit behaved like i^2 = 1 + i.
In my view this was something math professors
could understand: Two dimensional numbers 'just like' the complex
plane they know. After 30 years I can safely conclude that the 3D
numbers just don't fall in any good earth over there in the world
of professional math professors.
So that's why I am doing this lately and of
course it is also fun to do. After all me looking at Diophantine
equations is like a Russian soldier saying Vodka is
disgusting...;)
Well Diophantine equations are nice but the
numbers tau are nicer. It's a bit more hardcore because you must
be able to find the logarithm of an imaginary unit. In the two
dimensional plane we only have one of those imaginary units namely
i and it is always a pleasure to solve that kind of
logarithmic puzzle.
These are what I always name the numbers tau,
it's the logarithm of some imaginary unit. Anyway the next post on
the other website is about finding such a number tau when you use
the multiplication ruled by i^2 = -1 + i.
Yeah yeah, it is often hard math work to find
such a number tau. For example it is hard to find the values of
such integrals as above and in the case of two dimensions they are
now as simple as possible!
Sometime this week I can hang the new post in
the other website.
That was it for this update, thanks for your
attention.
(15 Dec 2023) Sometimes politics go slow and
sometimes they go fast. In my own parliament there was voted on
going through with financial and military aid to Ukraine. And this
evening I read that UA can start getting into the EU? I did'n read
the details so I won't comment...;)
Anyway it is late so here are the two items
for this update:
Item 1) Estimated Russian losses & a bit
politics stuff.
Item 2) Pete Judo on six ways scientists fake their data.
Item 1) Estimated
Russian losses & a bit politics stuff.
It is an estimate from the US about the
overall losses of the Russian military forces since the begin of
the war in Ukraine. It stands at about 87% of the size of the
initial invading forces. That is a staggering number, over 300
thousand dead & wounded.
Article from Forbes (may be you hit a paywall):
Title:
315,000 Russian Troops Have Been Killed Or Injured In Ukraine, U.S. Says—Far More Than Russia Claims.
Link used:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brianbushard/2023/12/12/315000-russian-
troops-have-been-killed-or-injured-in-ukraine-us-says-far-more-
than-russia-claims/?sh=3a1e16a4eea5
Another development came from across the
ocean: Already next week US lawmakers will come together to vote
on the UA funding (and of course the other issues there are).
Click on the picture for the Reuters report:
Title Reuter report: US Senate to vote on Ukraine funding, border security next week.
So all in all it could be far worse but as
they say in the US that you must wait for some fat lady that
starts singing. Why this is I don't know, but it is a funny
saying. Lets go to the next item.
Item 2) Pete Judo on
six ways scientists fake their data.
No electron rant today and no math either. I
found a funny video from Pete Judo, a lovely name by the way,
where he describes a bit how it goes with our tax payer
money.
Well science is in large part also a very
social endeavor and of course it has to be. Without internal
communication it is hard to find global goals of research. And
that has it's own drawbacks like we see in the use of phrases like
"Publish or Perish" wisdom.
And the way present scientific publishing
works does not help very much. There is always that tendency to go
for sensational claims and most non-results will absolutely not
get published.
In how far does this play a role in math
& physics? I mean the 'faking the data' kind of thing. I think
in math it is not a big problem, fake data will not help when you
are crafting pure math. In the math science it is more a lack of
imagination that is problematic to the speed of new discoveries.
The problem is not that math professors publish fake math
theorems...
In physics of course it gets a bit more
sloppy. Just like Pete said: You have these outliers in your data
set and you throw these outliers out of your data set because if
you include them you do not have a significant results.
And what about the cute practice of
p-hacking? You simply start collecting data until you have a
significant low p-value and after that you stop collecting data?
Do you think in a data hungry science like physics this never
happens?
Of course it will be, after all science is an
interesting form of social behavior. I combined the screenshot
from Pete with the Aurora Borealis that as far as I know is not a
fake. No the Aurora Borealis is not a fake because the solar
electrons slam in so hard because they are fucking stupid magnetic
monopoles!
Oh, oops, I said this item was not about
electron spin rants...
Anyway, here is the video. If you want to see it click on the
picture:
Video title: 6 Ways Scientists Fake Their Data
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uqDhQxhmDg
That was it for this update, thanks for your
attention.
(13 Dec 2023) Normally when we are out of
electricity here for 10 minutes in a year, that year is promoted
to the hall of shame. But today it went on for hours and hours and
it was just a local problem. Lately we got new electricity cables
and one of them broke. That's why it took so long: the workers had
to dig and repair the stuff. And with electricity you just cannot
haste that kind of stuff. So I did not view much news
today...
Item 1) Zelensky meets the Viktor in
Argentine.
Item 2) New post, a bit of math and Intel's Tunnel Falls spin
qubit chip.
Item 1) Zelensky
meets the Viktor in Argentine.
Oh oh Argentine has a new prez, lets hope it
won't be a disaster. He wants to get rid of the Argentine peso and
replace it with the dollar. Well Argentine's financial and
economical problems are wide and deep, lets not go into that.
If it wasn't all that serious the next photo
would be hilarious. Zelensky talking to the Viktor. Well may be
there is a way to work around the problems and free up the funds
that Ukraine needs. On the other hand, a veto is a veto and
individual EU member states just have that right. With all that
politics in place it is hard to estimate what will happen.
The screenshot if from a video from Deutsche
Welle, click on the picture if you want to see it.
Video title: Ukraine fears for financial support from the EU and the USA
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6B_U0vz_Qo
The same goes for the USA where the UA aid is
mixed in with other things like funding border protection against
illegal immigrants. Again lets hope for the best...
Lets go to the next item.
Item 2) New post, a
bit of math and Intel's Tunnel Falls spin qubit chip.
Over on the other website I finally posted
something about magnetism again. I could not do that for a long
time because the number of posts upon magnetism would be greater
as the number of posts on 3D complex numbers.
We can't have that of course therefore in the
last few months everything magnetic was updated over here on this
website. The latest post is basically what I wrote last week upon
those experiments that violate the so called Bell inequality. In
my view where electrons carry a monopole magnetic charge it is
impossible for an electron to be in a superposition of spin
states.
And that is where likely all those experiments go wrong: They
always start with an electron that supposedly is into such a super
position (a Bell state, a so called maximum entangled quantum
state). After that they perform measurements on the photons that
are produced by those electrons.
Well I don't buy all that crap like
"When we measure the spin state of an electron here, an
entangled electron in another galaxy will instantly flip into the
other spin state. Don't forget these people do not even have basic
experimental proof that the electron is a bipolar magnet. On top
of that no one has a problem with that. But they are very good in
talking out of their neck when it comes to electron spin... Here
is the link:
Where do all those experiments for the Bell test go wrong?
________
I found a perfect so called parametrization
for the ellipse that is defined by the determinant being one when
you use the complex plane ruled by i^2 = -1 + i instead of
the usual way of just i^2 = -1.
I managed to use just two coordinate
functions just like the good old Euler did when crafting the e^it
= cos t + i sin t. To be honest I was a
little bit proud on myself (don't worry it lasted only a few micro
seconds) and for sure this was a very lucky shot.
In the picture below you see two graphs, the
red is the ellipse and the blue is an expression when I fill in
the two cosines in the determinant. That gives 0.75 or 3/4. That
is why you must blow up the red graph by a factor of the square
root out of 4/3 so that the determinant becomes one.
I can't use it in the next post because that
is about calculating the number tau for this kind of complex
plane. Yes I said I will leave out all complicated stuff like the
numbers tau, but one is allowed I guess.
In order to let the parametrization start in
the number 1 I had to replace the time variable t by t
+ 0.5. That is why I choose the time interval to be from 0 to 5.5
so you can see it now starts in the number 1.
It was very funny to do: Just two cosines to
cover an ellipse. Most math professors need more complicated
looking stuff although the + 0.5 in my stuff also looks a bit
complicated. Lets go to the last detail in the item 2)
__________
Intel's Tunnel Falls 12 spin qubit quantum
chip.
Somewhere this Summer I showed you a video
from NYU where a bunch of people discuss this new quantum chip.
Since the TU Delft has a working relation with Intel when it comes
to quantum chips it was reasonable at the time to estimate that
also the TU Delft people would get one of those quantum chips...
Well the Intel product has 12 qubits based on
electron spin. And in my world that means they have 12 isolated
electrons that just cannot flip their spin in a billion years of
time.
As such this device is totally garbage and
until now I still don't have any reports on this from the TU Delft
people. That was what I expected this Summer and now we are almost
at the end of this year 2023 it seems to be coming out...
Here is how the stuff is promoted and the
little arrows are supposed to be the spins of the electrons. Click
on the picture to see the exiting Intel promotional video:
Video title: Intel Quantum Researchers Introduce Tunnel Falls Silicon Qubit Research Chip
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVWZEFMEtjw
So nothing reported from the TU Delft
weirdo's. What will likely happen in the future? Well if there
will come out any news it will be that it does not work and they
need more funding. They will need more funding to fight climate
change or whatever crap the quantum computers will do for the
benefit of humanity.
Don't forget these weirdo's have zero point
zero experimental proof that electrons are indeed tiny magnets.
Lets leave it with that and let me upload
this to humanities biggest garbage can: The internet. Thanks for
your attention.
(08 Dec 2023) So luckily I can type again, I
had a nasty gout attack in one of my wrists and that is no fun.
Gout is a relatively stupid illness, one of those old age
illnesses. And because of that humans never got selected on that,
you only get gout when you don't get kids anymore so there is no
way of better genes entering the population...
But enough on my health, likely you have
fallen already asleep! So the two items for today are:
Item 1) More diplomatic troubles & the
railroad attacks from last week.
Item 2) On the TU Delft loophole free Bell test, the 24 Aug 2015
paper.
Item 1) More
diplomatic troubles & the railroad attacks from last week.
Bah more political troubles, the US Senate
voted 49 to 51 against aid for Ukraine. And also aid for Israel so
that is very very strange, US republicans against aid for Israel?
Anyway over there the whole thing is entangled with funding the
border in some attempt to fight illegal immigration.
These things have nothing to do with each other, but hey it is
politics so everything goes...
In the EU a similar sized set back, Hungary
veto's the aid package for Ukraine. It is what it is, but it is
not a welcome development of course.
Last week there was a nice strategic benefit
for Ukraine when they managed to put a bomb on a train going
through a tunnel to China. There seems to be one other railway to
China in that part of the Russian landscape and that was also
bombed via the method of loading a bomb on board of those trains.
The tunnel blast was interesting because that
train had all kinds of fuel on board and such fires in tunnels
like that take a long time to repair. Now this was an attack done
on Russian soil, may be it is even possible to place future bombs
on trains coming from China itself. I think that is allowed
because China facilitates the transfer of those one million
artillery shells delivered by North Korea. Sometimes you actions
have consequences my dear Chinese...
Anyway today the Pioneer had a video out on
that attack. That Pioneer channel has always video titles that are
a bit over the top. Over the top or not, the only thing that
matters is of course that the information offered is as close to
what really happened as possible. Click on the picture to land at
the video:
Video title: 3 MINUTES AGO: An emergency Call At The Kremlin! Russian Railway Line has Been Destroyed!
The Pioneer
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85tNV6HMDCo
It looks like a very hard repair work, so
this was well done my dear Ukrainians. Lets go to our next
item:
Item 2) On the TU
Delft loophole free Bell test, the 24 Aug 2015 paper.
I remember that years back I downloaded that
pdf from TU Delft as found on the preprint archive. At the time I
was just getting started with looking into that detail of
electrons being tiny magnets. As such I did read a lot of that
stuff as published by the TU Delft and of course many more
sources.
Only this year I found a marketing like
slogan that sums it nicely up:
The magnetic properties of the electron are
just like their electric properties: Permanent and monopole.
The physics professors have very different
idea's about that: Based on an experiment done in the 1300-dreds
where a magnet was cut in two pieces, they believe that magnetic
monopoles do not exist. As such even today they believe that
electrons are tiny magnets and for some strange reason cannot
figure out for themselves that this is a very problematic
assumption.
Now back in the year 2015 I really tried to
read that pdf from TU Delft, but it was so hard to understand. For
example they have an electron prepared in a Bell state and
entangle a photon with that.
What the hell does that mean? I often had no clue but today I know
what Bell states are and how Delft people 'entangle' a photon with
an electron spin state: They just fire a laser at the electron and
all photons produced in this way are entangled with the electron
they say...
Well I say the magnetic charge of electrons
is simply permanent and as such it is one hundred % impossible
that an individual electron is in a super position of the two
magnetic states there are. And it's fucking impossible to bring
two electrons in a so called Bell state.
Last year in 2022 there were even Nobel
prizes handed out to the folks who for the first time did such
experiments. Mr. Aspect was one of those and he remarked that it
is very very hard to do such experiments with the electrons
themselves and that's why they use photons.
As far as I know all those experiments have
the assumption that you start with an electron that is in a
superposition of the two magnetic states. Since in my view this is
impossible because the electron charge is permanent and non-flipable,
this is more a social experiment and has not much to do with
science.
Physics and also math professors mostly do
social things. They try very hard to get publications into so
called 'high impact' scientific journals. They try to get as high
as possible on all kinds of citation and quotation indices. As I
say it: They only try to score social coins. And in the meantime
they do not much science anymore although I have to admit it is
very hard to define what science precisely is. May be it is better
to keep such definitions of science as vague as possible so that
science is more or less like porn:
It is hard to define but when you see it, you
recognize it.
So that is what I think of all those Bell
experiments: The basic assumption that electrons can be in a super
position of the two magnetic states is bull shit done by folks
that try to score social coins and admiration from their
peers.
I also found a video, that is why I am
writing this update because it is a nice video with music and it
abundantly shows that physics professors keep on thinking that
electrons can be in a super position of spin states.
As always click on the picture to land at the video:
Video title: TU Delft – A loophole-free Bell test.
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AE8MaQJkRcg
And if you want to go hardcore, the 2015 TU
Delft pdf is on the preprint archive so you can download it:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1508.05949.pdf
Pdf title: Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron
spins separated by 1.3 km.
__________
At last I want to remark that I absolutely no
longer try to talk to physics professors using logic. No they live
in their world, I live in mine. And I would like to keep those
worlds separated.
Lets say: These worlds cannot get entangled via magnetic field lines
because I want to keep my world free from garbage and
pollution.
That was the update for today, think well and
work well.
(06 Dec 2023) The last days it emerged that
during a small row between the UK and the EU over COVID vaccines
Boris Johnson had his military and spy agencies making plans to
invade our country and get those vaccines... Yes that is what you
get if you vote a bunch of low IQ ideologues into power.
The BoJo government did wonderful stuff during the COVID crises
like ordering infected people into care homes. No, not in a few
selected care homes where all things COVID were concentrated. Just
send them to care homes... So the Dutch can ponder if it is wise
to have our local weirdo Geert Wilders as the next pm or as we
name it: the premier.
In an unrelated but hilarious BoJo detail,
after a local car crash the police found the next id that is,
believe it or not, valid till the year 3000:
Two items for the update for today:
Item 1) Artur Rehi on our Geert & DW on
the USA funds for UA.
Item 2) A bit of math & perfect 'talking out of their necks'
observed.
Item 1) Artur Rehi on our
Geert & DW on the USA funds for UA.
To my surprise when looking at one of Artur
his video's our own Geert Wilders came along! Now in the previous
years I always avoided reading news on our Geert because he is
such a dumb man. So I didn't know it that Geert has visited Russia
not that long after the MH-17 detail.
So I did not use screenshots from the video
from Artur, after all deep fakes are getting better and better.
Therefore I just looked it up on some image searches and yes there
it is: Geert visiting Russia!
Now is our Geert also funded by Russia? I
don't know and that is more a case for the Dutch secret services
but it could explain as why he wants to stop military aid to
Ukraine. Another explanation could of course be he is so fucking
stupid but sometimes with folks like our Geert money talks.
As always click on the picture to land at the
video from Arur Rehi:
Video title: Ukrainians Exploded Deep into Russian Rear Areas
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNitpWGtFMU
Deutsche Well had a short video on all that
funding stuff in the USA now they have a new House speaker. If
memory serves it contains about 60 billion US$ for Ukraine. As a
comparison our country raised it's UA budget by 2 billion € for
the fiscal year 20024, I don't know what the total is. Say 4
billion (may be 6 billion, I just don't know).
The US population size is about 20 times our
Dutch population size, so if the 4 billion € is more or less
correct, sizing it up to USA population size would give about 80
billion €.
That's all very interesting but the big
problem is not comparing the size of help for Ukraine, the problem
is we do not have much military gear. It is vital that the USA
help can go through but instead of just do your work it all
becomes a bit politicized.
Video title: White House urges to pass funds for Ukraine | DW News
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrTjV1HWmMU
Lets go to the next item.
Item 2) A bit of math
& perfect 'talking out of their necks' observed.
There is a very weird way of crafting a new
complex plane if you replace the way the complex plane is usually
ruled (that's i^2 = -1) by the new rule
i^2 = -1 + 2i.
In that case the complex exponential (yes
that's the e^it thing from Euler) now become straight
lines. And powers of the new imaginary unit i now hop over
that line, see below. I only showed a few positive powers of i
but powers of the inverse i^-1 hop into the other
direction.
Somewhere on the internet I came across a
person that showed the simple linear transformation that does the
trick into hopping over all integer points. So my estimation was
that he or she has done it before because after all it is kind of
weird to describe it as a linear transformation when you look for
integers points on the line y = -x + 1.
So this person has likely done it on some ellipses and may be some
hyperbola because otherwise you would not formulate it this way.
Of course the linear transformation he or she found was the same
as multiplying points by i if you use the new rule of i^2
= -1 + 2i. I was glad not everybody on this planet is totally
braindead.
In the picture below in the upper half I show
you three examples of how you can multiply complex numbers. It
makes a transition where the complex exponentials are ellipses to
where they are hyperbola. And in between you get a straight line,
it's not very important I think but is sure is cute.
In the lower half I placed some powers of
i using that new rule or if you want on that particular
complex plane:
Electron time! A few days back I had nothing
to do and just for fun I did a search on bing.com on the phrase:
"Proof that electrons are tiny magnets". Of course there
exists no such proof or experiment, it is just something that is
commonly believed without any question.
Now often I wonder why the physics professors
do not see for themselves that viewing electrons as tiny magnets
bring a boatload of weird and crazy stuff with it. For example
electron spins must have an anti-aligment in them because the
Pauli principle says they must have different spin quantum
numbers...
But anti-alignment simply means they now must
bond via north pole against north pole so you have to throw
overboard the principle that all magnets large or tiny must have
opposite poles in order to bind.
Often the weirdo's from physics and even
chemistry 'explain' it by saying that if the electrons combine in
an anti-alignment manner, in that way they are magnetically
neural. In itself this might be true but why would electrons do
that? Well the weirdo's never explain that detail.
Now my search on bing.com did of course not
give any result when it comes to proving that electrons are tiny
magnets. But the very first thing that popped up was from Cornell
University and more stupid as this is hard to find. The spins
combine "up" and "down", that is the
anti-alignment part, and they compare that to "like two bar
magnets with opposite poles together".
I am not making this up, this is what
university people dot: They just talk out of their
necks.
Instead of remarking that anti-alignment in
electron pairs is one of the weird weird things in quantum
physics, they just talk out of their necks once more by comparing
it to two aligned bar magnets...
By the way; didn't Albert Einstein once
remark that in this world only two things are of infinite size:
The universe and the dumbness of people. And he was strikingly
correct, after all Einstein himself never understood that it is
impossible for electrons to be tiny magnets.
So lets leave it with that and I will try to
upload this update to the biggest garbage can humanity has: the
internet.
Thanks for your attention, thanks for not
falling asleep and may be in the next elections thanks for not
voting idiots into power. I don't mind what you vote, just don't
vote idiots into power...
(01 Dec 2023) There is indeed some weird
stuff going on with tankers from Greece transporting Russian oil.
It seems they don't abide by the 60$ price cap and we can't have
that of course. See from the business insider:
Greek oil tankers are avoiding Russia after getting a stern letter from the US.
I found no further information on the rumor that Greece also sold
old oil tankers to Russia, these were old tankers designated for
scrapping them. But if Russia expands their tanker fleet that way
that is very unhelpful.
I do not know if those rumors bear any truth and I do not want to
make false accusations but if true we can't have stuff like
that...
After having said that, two items for
today:
Item 1) Latest Ramstein meeting and a new air
defense coalition for UA.
Item 2) Advertisement for the latest math post.
Item 1) Latest
Ramstein meeting and a new air defense coalition for UA.
Last week there was a new round of Ramstein
meetings, it was the 17-th already if I remember it correctly. Of
course there are plenty of problems like that lack of shell for
artillery and all kinds of stuff known or unknown.
But there was a new air defense coalition
formed under leadership of Germany and France. That is a good
thing because it's not only good for Ukraine but we Europeans too
have to master the art of air defense much more in the present
time of drone warfare.
I didn't look up the details but Germany has
also anti air stuff with big machine guns and the whole thing
seems to be laser guided. You understand why I consider that
interesting: there goes a ton of math into such systems...
Beside that the US Patroits are very good but
you can't just use them for drones, that is not an efficient way
of using them. Patriots must do the big rocket stuff that Russia
fires, in particular getting better and better at taking out those
superfast hypersonic missiles. Those hypersonic things also have a
nuclear capability so all in all it is important to learn how to
shoot them down before they reach their target.
Anyway Germany also has a giant 60 billion
€ in her budget so lets hope they can solve that. (A German
judge activated the so called "Schulden Bremse" and yes
if that is a law over there indeed there is a big problem...)
Lets go to the next item.
Item 2) Advertisement
for the latest math post.
Last Monday I posted the latest math post, it
is about 2D multiplications so ways of multiplying two numbers in
a plane. It's all very simple I left all more complicated stuff
like the numbers tau out. First that basics and they are already
very promising.
To focus the mind, hopefully you know that
the complex plane is ruled by an imaginary number i and
it's square is given by: i^2 = -1. If you replace that rule
by say i^2 = -1 + i you get a ton of interesting features.
You might wonder why the professional math
professors don't do stuff like that. Well if you would do that as
a math professor, that is bad for your career and likely you won't
get anything published. Beside that it might very well be there is
just no (expensive) math journal for such investigations.
Well it is what it is, math professors are just as weird as the
physics professors with their incoherent ramblings on electron
spin.
But it has all kinds of interesting math
features, for example below you can see a number i^3 = -3 + 8i.
Now in the world of the overpaid math professors if you would
calculate the inverse of this number unavoidable you are getting
fractions in your answer.
Yet in the plane ruled by i^2 = -1 + 3i
your complex exponential is a hyperbole and all powers of i
have an inverse without any fractions. It all has it's own logic
but hey try to explain that to the math professors...
To be honest if you would have told me five
years back that in the year 2023 I would seriously consider
studying so called Diophantine equations in the plane I would tell
you that you are mentally ill. Diophantine equations are mostly
just equations with solution but the Diophantine means you want
integer solutions to these equations.
May be you have heard of Pythagorean triples
like 3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2. That in itself is a very Diophantine kind of
problem because you want integers that do the thing.
If you have a Pythagorean triple like above
all of a sudden there are more solutions to an equation as x^2 +
y^2 = 5 compared to x^2 + y^2 = 4. Instead of 4 there are now 8
solutions.
Now my new found complex planes have all
kinds of stuff that is very similar to idea's like that. For
example if you use the rule i^2 = -1 + i all powers of i
do lie on an ellipse and often there are six solutions to that.
Those six solutions rotate if you multiply
them by the i that rules this particular kind of
multiplying 2D numbers. But like expected, sometimes there are
more solutions like in the next picture:
There are now 12 solutions falling into two
different groups of each 6 integer solutions.
It's all cute math stuff and may be I should
post the link to it:
Title of the new post: 2D elliptical and hyperbolic multiplications.
Link used: https://3dcomplexnumbers.net/2023/11/28/
2d-elliptical-and-hyperbolic-multiplications/
Ok let's not get confused about math or
physics of overpaid professors! It is better to KEEP ON KILLING
THOSE FUCKING RUSSIANS!
After speaking such words of peace, let me
try to upload this to the internet.
As always thanks for your attention and see you in a new
update.
(29 Nov 2023) No intro talk on Greece oil
tankers sold to Russia, just two items for this day's
update:
Item 1) Our weird Geert & interesting UA
sniper records.
Item 2) Einstein de Haas effect; talking our of their necks again?
Item 1) Our weird
Geert & interesting UA sniper records.
Oh oh I would never think I would voluntary
look at some videos with our weird Geert talking. Well he has not
changed and he still wants a Nexit because for example of
(illegal) immigration.
Well look at the UK how that one goes since
their Brexit: They now have record numbers of immigrants but now
they cannot send back illegal immigrants to the country they first
landed in. And why? Well they are no longer part of the EU.
This idiot, Geert, will only make those
problems worse if he gets his way...
Every body can look up statistics, say
economical statistics from the UK and see for yourself how good
that Brexit is for their economy. Not much. So why does Geert not
do such stuff? Well like said before; he is just to fucking stupid
to understand such statistics.
A Nexit will do miracles for our agriculture
exports; if every plant or animal item has to be inspected by a
veterinarian and specialists in plant diseases, that will hurt our
economy very bad.
But again if you ask Geert you only get weird
emotional stuff and just never ever anything that is logical. The
guy is a walking disaster.
From Ukraine I only have a small but very
interesting detail. It's about sniper stuff, those long distance
shooters. I myself was not very good at shooting, I just could not
suppress my reflex of closing my eyes after pulling the trigger so
I could never see where the bullet did slam in.
But in itself the sniper stuff is an art or a science in itself.
There goes a whole lot of stuff into being a good sniper or
marksman.
The distances claimed by the Ukrainians are a
huge improvement over long standing records. If it's all correct,
my compliments! An interesting feature is that they produce these
kind of long distance rifles themselves. That is a good thing of
course. US defense news had a video out recently, as always click
on the picture to land at the video:
Video title: Ukraine sharpshooter eliminates a Russian soldier 3,800 metres away with sniper rifle
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBZFUADgMl4
Lets go to the next item:
Item 2) Einstein de
Haas effect; talking our of their necks again?
Often I wonder as why the physics people for
themselves never see all those problems you have when you view
electrons as tiny magnets. When it comes to explaining all kinds
of problems they come up with all kinds of explanations that in
itself often sound logical.
But if you lay these kind of explanations next to each other, it
is not very consistent. It's often completely contrary, the stuff
just does not add up.
For example in the Stern-Gerlach experiment
the splitting into two streams of silver atoms is explained by the
probabilistic behavior of electrons: With a probability of 50% the
spin will point up and also 50% of pointing down.
Ok, this sounds reasonable and if you like
almost 100% of physics people not capable of doing the math to
calculate that 'tiny electron magnets' just can't explain this,
you might believe in that crap explanation.
Now a few weeks back I came across the
Einstein de Haas effect. The effect is that an iron cylinder
starts rotating when you flip on the magnetic field. (It is caused
by a changing or alternating magnetic field, see the video below.)
And how do they explain that?
Well if 50% of electrons would flip to spin
up and the other 50% would flip to spin down, in that case the
cylinder would never start to rotate...
But the physics people are very very good in talking out of their
neck and as such one 100% percent of electrons flip their spin
either up or down.
Now the underlying explanation is 'conservation of angular
momentum'.
And as such the whole principle of the
electron spin state as being probabilistic is thrown overboard and
0% of the physics community say this is crazy.
Well they live in their world and I live in
mine and in my world the electrons are the long sought magnetic
monopoles. The magnetic properties of the electrons are just as
their electric properties:
PERMANENT &
MONOPOLE!
So all that stuff of electrons flipping their
spin is bull shit as told by people that are 'locally smart' in
the sense they can 'explain' one experiment. But they just don't
have oversight of how all those different experiments must also
have a so called 'global explanation'. And that is my monopole
stuff...
But try to explain that to your local physics
professors...
Anyway it is late over here so let me try and
upload this stuff. The video is a bit boring if you are not into
physics but if you want to see it just click on the picture
below:
Video title: 5H60.10 - Einstein De Haas
Effect
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFkW0PHhXcY
Well that was it for this update. Thanks for
your attention and ask your local physics professor why they are
crazy...;)
(24 Nov 2023) Oh oh, that were some weird
elections! The PVV of Geert Wilders became the greatest party and
as such we run the risk of Geert as the next pm. If that happens
the Dutch population can learn it is not that smart to have a
dumbass pm.
For example our Geert would love to have a
Nexit, he would like to leave the EU just like the Brits did. So
why would he be in favor of that? Well one of the reasons is that
Geert is a relative dumb person. He is too stupid to understand
all the negative economical effects it will have, just like the
Brexiteers were on average to dumb to understand such complicated
stuff.
What is good about Geert Wilders? Well he has
a healthy motoric system so he can walk and move and so. And, very
important, like a lot of politicians he has a well developed
speech center in his brain. As such a lot of voters seem to think
he also has a good cognition, but sorry that is not the case. All
his stuff is never thought through, most of the time it just an
emotional eruption like his explanation of why they won the
elections:
"De mensen zijn er spuugzat van!"
Translated that would be something like "The people are spit
saturated by it". So nothing of any form of analysis, only
one more emotional and stupid thing that explains just nothing.
Well we will have an interesting future over
here, hopefully it will go down more or less like the fantastic
government of Liz Truss. That's also a weird ideologue with little
cognitive capabilities.
Well we'll see, lets go to our items of
today:
Item 1) It took Russians 40 days to capture
this post, why?
Item 2) More math & An applause for the chemistry guy Three
TwentySix!
Item 1) It took
Russians 40 days to capture this post, why?
The channel Reporting from Ukraine had a
hilarious video out about a remote controlled machine gun. That
machine gun kept away the Russians for 40 days from the gun nest
it was in. It's totally hilarious, the Russians tried all kinds of
things like lots of artillery and even air power but the stupid
machine gun refused to die...;)
My dear Ukrainians I have no idea about how
the elections over here will influence the aid to Ukraine. Likely
the F16 stuff will go through but if you have an idiot as pm it is
hard to say what will happen. Plans were also to add an additional
2 billion € to next year's budget for Ukraine, lets hope that
won't get derailed by weird political forces.
It is what it is, there is no rolling back
these elections. Anyway as always click on the picture to land at
the video:
Video title: 22 Nov: WOW. Ukrainians UNLEASH ROBOTS-MACHINE GUNS
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEPwAJhR_uQ
Likely at night (Russians don't have night
vision goggles) the Ukrainians replaced the electricity and fed
the brave machine gun fresh ammo. I hope they also talked to the
machine gun and said that he was a good boy.
But serious, how much Russians were shot dead
by this gun? I have no idea but if it kept the Russians at bay for
40 days it must have been a lot.
Lets go to the next item.
Item 2) More math
& An applause for the chemistry guy Three TwentySix!
The complex plane is defined by the imaginary
unit i and most people know that i^2 = -1. Powers of
i lie on the unit cirle, that is the so called complex exponential
or that Euler thing that says e^it = cos(t) + i*
sin(t).
You can very easy make all kinds of variants
of this complex plane by changing the behavior of the imaginary
unit i. I changed it to the next rule:
i^2 = -1 + 3i.
It's just an example but if you now take successive
powers of i, they all lie on the integer points of a hyperbola.
This hyperbola is the set of points that have a determinant of one
and as such they form a group. If you multiply any two points on
that hyperbola, the result always lies on that hyperbola again.
You can check for yourself that indeed i^3
= -3 + 8i and if you want you can use the good desmos graphing
package from the internet to plot the graph and check all other
powers of i do lie indeed on this graph.
Math professors never use these kind of
simple and easy changes to the way a multiplication works. They
only use the complex plane and those 4D numbers known as the
quaternions. Why this is I don't know, it is one of the forms that
they use to keep each other stupid I just guess...
Electron time! A small but significant detail
was observed: For the very first time in the nine years that I
doubt that electrons are tiny magnets, there is this chemistry guy
Three TwentySix that wonders why there are only electron
pairs.
That is worth a standing ovation for say 10
minutes long!
It proves that not everybody is braindead on
this planet, there is one guy that wonders why there are only
electron pairs. It is a true miracle, a non brain dead person
talking about electron spin...
Ok ok there are also lone electrons often
named unpaired electrons but if all that "electrons are tiny
magnets" bullshit was true, then why in the whole of
chemistry are there never ever more as two electrons combined?
The very smart non braindead guy Three
TwentySix does not jump to the right conclusion: electrons are not
tiny magnets but magnetic monopoles. But that does not matter, he
is the very first person in nine years time that actually
understands there is a weird problem here.
The video is about atomic orbitals and if you
do not know much about those orbitals this video is a very good
introduction. In the fourteenth minute it is where he doubts a bit
of how this all is supposed to work: electron pairs are two
electrons that are anti aligned and that is what the weirdo's of
quantum physics have made from it. So if you are interested as
always click on the picture to land at the video:
Video title: What ARE atomic orbitals?
Link used: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23bNW4G9DZk
Ok lets call it a day and let me try to
upload this to the biggest garbage can humanity has: the internet.
Thanks for your attention and thanks for not falling asleep with
my ramblings on electron spin.
For the time being I think I keep the next
picture as a 'closing logo' indicating you are at the end of this
homepage. It was to cute to throw away, the math is utterly simple
and I hope a tiny bit surprising.
Click on the picture to go to part 20 of the
archive:
End of this update, ChatGPT can you tell me
how to keep the number of killed Russians above one thousand a day
for the foreseeable future?
Till updates.
_________
For older updates see the archives at index19.htm
or go to the oversight
of the archive pages.
__________ End
|